|
|
||||||||
Allan McGavin Sports Medicine Center and School of Human Kinetics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z3
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study tested
the effects of inhaled nitric oxide [NO; 20 parts per million
(ppm)] during normoxic and hypoxic (fraction of inspired
O2 = 14%) exercise on gas exchange in athletes with exercise-induced hypoxemia. Trained male cyclists (n = 7) performed two cycle tests to exhaustion to determine maximal
O2 consumption (
O2 max) and
arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation
(SaO2, Ohmeda Biox ear oximeter)
under normoxic (
O2 max = 4.88 ± 0.43 l/min and SaO2 = 90.2 ± 0.9, means ± SD) and hypoxic
(
O2 max = 4.24 ± 0.49 l/min
and SaO2 = 75.5 ± 4.5) conditions. On a
third occasion, subjects performed four 5-min cycle tests, each
separated by 1 h at their respective
O2 max, under randomly assigned conditions: normoxia (N), normoxia + NO (N/NO), hypoxia (H), and hypoxia + NO (H/NO). Gas exchange, heart rate, and metabolic
parameters were determined during each condition. Arterial blood was
drawn at rest and at each minute of the 5-min test. Arterial
PO2 (PaO2), arterial
PCO2, and SaO2 were
determined, and the alveolar-arterial difference for
PO2 (A-aDO2) was
calculated. Measurements of PaO2 and
SaO2 were significantly lower and
A-aDO2 was widened during exercise compared
with rest for all conditions (P < 0.05). No significant differences were detected between N and N/NO or between H
and H/NO for PaO2, SaO2 and
A-aDO2 (P > 0.05). We conclude
that inhalation of 20 ppm NO during normoxic and hypoxic exercise has no effect on gas exchange in highly trained cyclists.
exercise-induced hypoxemia; pulmonary edema; ventilation-perfusion inequality; diffusion disequilibrium
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
SOME HIGHLY TRAINED
MALE ENDURANCE athletes experience decreases in arterial
PO2 (PaO2) and arterial
oxyhemoglobin saturation (SaO2) and a widened
alveolar-arterial difference for O2
(A-aDO2) during heavy exercise (5,
13). The cause and significance of exercise-induced arterial
hypoxemia (EIH) has been the topic of a considerable research effort;
however, the mechanism(s) responsible remains controversial. Four
potential factors have been identified: 1) venoarterial
shunt, 2) relative alveolar hypoventilation, 3) ventilation-perfusion (
A/
) inequality, and
4) diffusion limitation. Venoarterial shunt has been
identified as a minor contributor, and relative alveolar
hypoventilation has a controversial role in the pathophysiology of EIH
(6).
A/
relationships have been
shown to worsen with exercise (10), and, during maximal exercise, ~60% of the widened A-aDO2 can be
explained by
A/
mismatch (14).
Pulmonary interstitial edema may explain both
A/
inequality and diffusion limitations
(11, 26). This would be expected to negatively influence
gas exchange in the lung by lowering the compliance of the alveoli and
by compressing small blood vessels, resulting in nonuniform airflow and
blood flow distribution in the lungs (11). However,
present techniques have failed to provide precise quantification of
extravascular lung water or identification of the specific mechanisms
responsible for the development of interstitial edema (6).
Inhaled nitric oxide (NO) is a potent and selective pulmonary vasodilator (8, 9). Inhalation of NO has been used effectively to treat several respiratory disorders in humans (1, 15, 16) but has been shown to be detrimental in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (1). The positive effects of NO are explained by a preferential distribution of inhaled NO to well-ventilated alveolar units, a reduction in the dispersion of ventilation distribution, lowering of pulmonary vascular pressures, and improved gas exchange. Inhalation of NO has also been utilized to exert a beneficial effect on arterial oxygenation in mountaineers with high-altitude pulmonary edema (27). Although the mechanisms of EIH remain debatable, there is some indirect evidence to support the development of transient interstitial edema as a mechanism for a widened A-aDO2 (3, 23). We sought to test the hypothesis that inhaled NO would improve oxygenation during exercise in athletes with EIH by reducing A-aDO2.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects.
Highly trained male cyclists were recruited to participate in this
study (n = 8). One subject was forced to withdraw due
to difficulties with placement of the arterial catheter; therefore, all
data are reported for n = 7. This investigation was
divided into two parts. Subjects who met the inclusion criteria in
part 1 participated in part 2. Inclusion criteria
were 1) normal spirometry, that is, no history of asthma or
cardiorespiratory disease, 2) maximal O2
consumption (
O2 max)
60
ml · kg
1 · min
1 and/or 5 l/min, 3) development of EIH (maximal exercise
SaO2
91.0%), and 4) between the ages of
18 and 40 yr. Before testing was started, subjects received a verbal
description of the experiment and completed a written, informed consent
form. This study was approved by the Clinical Screening Committee for
Research and Other Studies Involving Human Subjects of the University
of British Columbia.
Preliminary screening: part 1. Subjects reported to the Applied Physiology Laboratory in the Allan McGavin Sports Medicine Center (Univ. British Columbia), having refrained from exhaustive exercise for 24 h, abstained from ingestion of food or fluid for 4 h, except for water, and abstained from alcohol and caffeine for 12 h. Subjects' weight and height were measured and recorded. Both spirometry and pulmonary diffusion measurements for carbon monoxide (DLCO) were collected using the same commercial apparatus (Collins DS/PLUS II, Braintree, MA). DLCO was determined using the single-breath method. Before DLCO and spirometry measurements were made, subjects sat and rested for 30 min to ensure a resting heart rate and pulmonary capillary blood volume.
O2 max was determined using an
incremental test to exhaustion on an electronically braked cycle
ergometer (Quinton Excalibur, Lode, Groningen, The Netherlands).
Subjects pedaled at a self-chosen cadence at a progressing
workload, which started at 0 W and increased 30 W/min. Subjects
inspired through an air flowmeter (Vacumetrics model 17150, Ventura,
CA) using a two-way nonrebreathing valve (Hans-Rudolph, model 2700B,
Kansas City, KS). Expired air passed into a 5-liter mixing chamber from
which gas samples were analyzed at a rate of 300 ml/min for
O2 and CO2 (S-3A O2 analyzer and
CD-3A CO2 analyzer, Applied Electrochemistry, Pittsburgh,
PA). Expired gases and minute ventilation (
E) were recorded using a computerized system (Rayfield, Waitsfield, VT). Gas
analyzers were calibrated with gases of known concentration, and the
air flowmeter was calibrated by passing 100 liters of air through the
system. Heart rate was recorded every 15 s using a portable heart
rate monitor (Polar Vantage XL, Kempele, Finland). SaO2 was measured by a pulse oximeter (Ohmeda Biox
3740, Louisville, CO), with values averaged and recorded every 5 s
using a personal computer. Before placement of the oximeter sensor to
the pinna of the ear, a topical vasodilator cream (Finalgon,
Boehringer/Ingeheim, Burlington, ON) was applied to increase local
perfusion. Attainment of
O2 max was
considered when at least three of the following four were observed:
1) a plateau in O2 consumption
(
O2) with increasing workload,
2) respiratory exchange ratio (RER) > 1.15, 3) attainment of 90% of age predicted maximal heart rate,
and/or 4) volitional fatigue. During part 1,
cycle ergometry subjects inspired compressed air [fraction of inspired
O2
(FIO2) = 20.93%]. The air was delivered from a large cylinder through a closed
container of water for humidification and then into a large
meteorological balloon, which acted as a reservoir for inspired air.
Those who met the inclusion criteria returned on a separate day at
least 72 h later to perform another maximal cycle ergometry test
under hypoxic conditions (FIO2 = 14.00%). This FIO2 has previously been used to accentuate decreases in SaO2 in exercising
trained men (17). Expired gases, heart rate, and
SaO2 were determined during the hypoxic exercise
session as described for the normoxic conditions.
Inhaled NO: part 2.
After completion of both
O2 max tests
(normoxic and hypoxic), subjects who met the inclusion criteria
returned on a separate day at least 72 h later. A time line
describing the experimental protocol is shown in Fig.
1. Subjects were randomly assigned and
blinded to each of the four following conditions: 1)
normoxia (N), 2) normoxia + NO (N/NO), 3)
hypoxia (H), and 4) hypoxia + NO (H/NO). Participants
performed a 10- to 15-min cycling warm-up at a self-selected
workload and then sat quietly on the cycle ergometer for 5 min, at
which point resting data were obtained. Cycling intensity was then
manually increased over 1 min to 100% of their respective maximum
normoxic or hypoxic workload as determined in part 1.
Subjects cycled at this intensity for 5 min, and cardiorespiratory
variables were recorded at each minute in the same fashion as for
part 1. Arterial blood samples were drawn at rest and at
each min of the 5-min test. After each test condition, subjects cycled
easily (30-50 W) for 10 min and then rested for 50 min before
commencing the next test condition. A physician was in attendance at
all times and was responsible for the safety of the subjects during the
study.
|
A/
distributions,
PaO2, and pulmonary vascular resistance in pigs
(24), reverse hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV),
and redistribute blood flow to better ventilated areas of the lung in
sheep (21).
Arterial blood sampling.
A 20-gauge arterial catheter was inserted in the radial artery of the
nondominant hand by percutaneous cannulation using 1% local anesthesia
(lidocaine) and sterile technique and was then secured to the skin.
Adequate collateral circulation via the ulnar artery (Allen's test)
was estimated before the cannula was inserted. A minimum volume
extension tube, connected in series with two three-way stopcocks
arranged at right angles, was flushed with a saline-heparin solution. A
rapid response (<0.01 s) thermistor (18T, Physitemp Instruments,
Clifton, NJ) used to measure peak arterial blood temperature was
inserted through a Touhy-Borsch heparin lock (Abbott Hospitals, North
Chicago, IL). Catheter patency was maintained with a continuous heparin
infusion (1 ml 1:1,000 units in 500 ml normal saline at 3 ml/h). At the onset of sampling, 12 ml of blood was withdrawn, and the
final 3 ml was collected in preheparinized plastic syringes. The
remaining 9 ml were then slowly reinfused. Samples were withdrawn at
rest and at 1-min intervals for the duration of each test (4 conditions × 6 samples per condition = 24 samples/subject).
Blood samples were placed on ice until analyzed for H+
concentration, PO2,
PCO2, base excess, and HCO3
(CIBA-Corning 278 blood-gas system, CIBA-Corning Diagnostics, Medfield,
MA). PaO2 was corrected for temperature and
H+ concentration. Temperature increased 0.9 ± 0.1°C
(mean ± SD) from rest to 5 min of exercise across all trials.
SaO2 levels were calculated based on corrected
PaO2. The alveolar gas equation was
used to calculated alveolar PO2 and
A-aDO2 (20).
Statistical analyses.
Mean values and measures of variability were determined for
descriptive, anthropometric, and lung function variables obtained during preliminary screening. Maximal cycle ergometry data from part 1 were compared using t-tests for dependent
samples (normoxia vs. hypoxia). Experimental data were analyzed using a
four (condition) by six (time) two-way factorial ANOVA with repeated
measures on both factors. When sphericity was not assumed,
Greenhouse-Geisser P values were utilized. When significant
F ratios were observed, Scheffé's test was applied
post hoc to determine where the differences occurred. The level of
significance was set at P < 0.05. Statistical power
calculations were performed a priori to estimate an appropriate minimum
sample size of five. A sample size of seven was utilized to ensure
sufficient statistical power (1
= 0.8).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Physical and maximal exercise data.
Descriptive data and resting pulmonary function data are
presented in Table 1. Lung parameters
were within normal values predicted for men of similar age,
height, and weight except for DLCO, which was
significantly elevated. Data from normoxic and hypoxic maximal cycle
ergometry tests are presented in Table 2. Significant differences were observed between normoxic and hypoxic conditions for
O2 max, RER, maximal
heart rate, and power output, whereas no significant differences were
detected for
E. From rest to maximal exercise, mean
values for SaO2 dropped significantly under both
normoxic (97.7 to 90.2) and hypoxic (97.0 to 75.5) conditions.
|
|
Metabolic and power output during 5-min cycling.
Metabolic and power output data are shown in Tables
3 and 4.
No significant differences were detected between N and N/NO or between
H and H/NO for
O2,
E,
RER, heart rate, or power output.
|
|
Arterial blood variables during 5-min cycling.
All data are reported in Tables 5
and 6 and Figs.
2 and 3.
Across all time points, there were no significant differences for
PaO2 between N and N/NO or between H and H/NO (see
Fig. 2). Both hypoxic conditions were significantly lower than both
normoxic conditions at all measurement periods.
PaO2 values were significantly lower at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 min of exercise compared with rest for all inspired gas
conditions. Similar results were observed for
SaO2, except that values at 1 and 2 min were not significantly different from rest under
conditions of N and N/NO (see Fig. 3). A-aDO2
was significantly different at all time periods compared with rest for
all inspired gas mixtures, and significant differences were detected
between N/NO and H at rest and during all exercise measurements.
Arterial PCO2
(PaCO2) was not significantly
different between gas conditions but was lower compared with
rest throughout all exercise for H and H/NO and at minutes
3, 4, and 5 for both N and N/NO. No
statistically significant differences were detected between N vs. N/NO
or between H vs. H/NO for pH, HCO3
, or base excess
(Tables 5 and 6).
|
|
|
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present study is the first to systematically examine the
effects of inhaled NO during normoxic and hypoxic exercise in athletes
with EIH. Unique to this investigation was the observation that
inhalation of 20 ppm NO during normoxic and hypoxic high-intensity, short-duration exercise did not significantly affect gas exchange,
O2, or cycling power in highly trained
athletes with EIH.
The mechanism(s) of EIH remains controversial. However,
A/
inequality and diffusion limitations may
be causative (6, 11, 30). The mechanisms explaining the
increases in
A/
inequality and diffusion
limitation are unknown but may be related to the development of
transient pulmonary edema (6). Some authors have suggested
that, in elite athletes, the integrity of the pulmonary blood-gas
barrier is altered at extreme levels of exercise (29). However, identification of pulmonary edema and pulmonary stress failure
has been difficult to achieve in exercising humans and remains
controversial. Although the specific mechanism for
A/
inequality and diffusion limitations is
debatable, the end result is a widened A-aDO2.
Inhaled NO, a selective pulmonary vasodilator (8, 9), is
used in the treatment of diseases characterized by pulmonary
hypertension and hypoxemia (1, 15, 16). The rationale is
based on the fact that NO, given by inhalation, only dilates those
pulmonary vessels that are well ventilated. As a result, pulmonary gas
exchange is improved. We hypothesized that inhaled NO would improved
gas exchange in athletes with EIH.
Inhaled NO during normoxia.
The present investigation demonstrated no differences in gas exchange,
O2, power, or heart rate between
N and N/NO at rest or during exercise. These findings do not support
our original hypothesis but do agree with observations in resting sheep
(17) and the fact that
PaO2 was not altered in normal
individuals who inhaled NO at rest (8). In
addition, our findings are consistent with data that reported no
effects of inhaled NO on
or DLCO in
humans (2) or PaO2 and
A/
in dogs (12) under normoxic conditions.
Inhaled NO during hypoxia.
Unique to this investigation was the delivery of NO to individuals with
EIH during hypoxic exercise. As expected, during H and H/NO,
PaO2 and SaO2 were significantly
lower than N and N/NO at all time points (Figs. 2 and 3). The drop in
oxygenation during hypoxic exercise was consistent with that observed
in previous EIH studies (22). Similar to the normoxic
trials, inhaled NO did not alter gas exchange,
O2, or cycling power during hypoxia. Pison et al. (21) showed that addition of 20 ppm NO to a
hypoxic (FIO2 = 12%) gas mixture
returned pulmonary gas-exchange measures to baseline values in
mechanically ventilated sheep. These are in contrast to our results in
which no statistical difference was observed for gas-exchange variables
between H and H/NO. This was an unexpected result; we expected that HPV
would be induced by using a hypoxic inspiratory gas mixture at rest and
during exercise.
A/
relationship and
may explain the lack of effect of NO on gas exchange. Furthermore,
subjects may have been slightly hyperventilating at the time of the
resting sample (PaCO2 of 36-38 Torr),
which could have affected the influence of NO.
The lack of effect of NO during hypoxic exercise is consistent with the
observations of Koizumi et al. (17). Inhalation of NO
during exercise in sheep had no effect on PaO2. In
addition, inhaled NO did not change the time course or magnitude of
changes in pulmonary pressures in the exercising sheep.
Limitations of the study. A debatable point is how much of the inhaled NO actually reached the lower airways? Although it was not possible to measure the amount of inhaled NO that reaches the alveoli, we assume that subjects in the present study did indeed inhale 20 ppm NO. We are confident that NO was delivered to the respiratory system, as it was measured 5 cm from the point of inspiration. The experimental approach and NO concentration employed in our study were similar to those employed by others (7). It is possible that the concentration of NO used in this study was not sufficient to induce vasodilation; however, this seems unlikely given that similar concentrations have been used previously to show significant alterations in gas exchange and pulmonary pressures (19, 21, 25). Our choice of 20 ppm was based on the above-mentioned studies and other clinical investigations.
It is possible that we failed to detect a statistical difference between conditions due to our small sample size and insufficient statistical power. However, this seems unlikely. Post hoc statistical power (1
) calculations were performed utilizing a computer statistical program for gas-exchange variables across normoxic and
hypoxic conditions. Power values ranged from 0.72 to 0.84, indicating
sufficient protection against type II errors.
Determination of pulmonary artery pressure and cardiac output in the
present study, together with
A/
measures,
would have allowed for more definitive conclusions on the effect of
inhaled NO during exercise. Because the use of NO was hypothesized to act as a selective pulmonary vasodilator, the lack of the measurement of pulmonary artery and wedge pressures represents a major limitation of this study.
In summary, we have demonstrated that inhalation of 20 ppm NO during
normoxic and hypoxic high-intensity, short-duration cycle exercise did
not significantly affect gas exchange in athletes with EIH.
Cardiorespiratory variables and cycling power output were also
unaffected by NO inhalation during normoxia and hypoxia. We conclude
that inhalation of 20 ppm NO during normoxic and hypoxic exercise has
no effect on gas exchange in highly trained cyclists.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: D. C. McKenzie, Allan McGavin Sports Medicine Center, 3055 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z3 (E-mail: kari{at}interchange.ubc.ca).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 10 December 1999; accepted in final form 13 September 2000.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Barberà, JA,
Roger N,
Roca J,
Rovira I,
Higenbottam TW,
and
Rodriguez-Rosin R.
Worsening of pulmonary gas exchange with nitric oxide inhalation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Thorax
52:
S16-S21,
1997
2.
Brett, SJ,
Chambers J,
Bush A,
Rosenthal M,
and
Evans TW.
Pulmonary response of normal human subjects to inhaled vasodilator substances.
Clin Sci (Colch)
95:
621-627,
1998[Medline].
3.
Caillaud, C,
Serre-Cousine O,
Anselme F,
Capdevilla X,
and
Prefaut C.
Computerized tomography and pulmonary diffusing capacity in highly trained athletes after performing a triathlon.
J Appl Physiol
79:
1226-1232,
1995
4.
Dempsey, JA.
Is the lung built for exercise?
Med Sci Sports Exerc
18:
143-155,
1986[ISI][Medline].
5.
Dempsey, JA,
Hanson PG,
and
Henderson KS.
Exercise-induced arterial hypoxemia in healthy human subjects at sea level.
J Physiol (Lond)
355:
161-175,
1984
6.
Dempsey, JA,
and
Wagner PD.
Exercise-induced arterial hypoxemia.
J Appl Physiol
87:
1997-2006,
1999
7.
Durand, F,
Mucci P,
Safont L,
and
Prefaut C.
Effects of nitric oxide inhalation on pulmonary gas exchange during exercise in highly trained athletes.
Acta Physiol Scand
165:
169-176,
1999[ISI][Medline].
8.
Frostell, C,
Blomqvist H,
Hedenstierna G,
Lundberg J,
and
Zapol WM.
Inhaled nitric oxide selectively reverses human hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction without causing systemic vasodilation.
Anesthesiology
78:
427-435,
1993[ISI][Medline].
9.
Frostell, C,
Fratacci MD,
Wain JC,
Jones R,
and
Zapol W.
Inhaled nitric oxide; a selective pulmonary vasodilator reversing hypoxic vasoconstriction.
Circulation
83:
2038-2047,
1991
10.
Gale, GE,
Torre-Bueno JR,
Moon RE,
Saltzman HA,
and
Wagner PD.
Ventilation-perfusion inequality in normal humans during exercise at sea level and simulated altitude.
J Appl Physiol
58:
978-988,
1985
11.
Hopkins, SR,
Gavin TP,
Siafakas NM,
Haseler LJ,
Olfert IM,
Wagner H,
and
Wagner PD.
Effect of prolonged, heavy exercise on pulmonary gas exchange in athletes.
J Appl Physiol
85:
1523-1532,
1998
12.
Hopkins, SR,
Johnson EC,
Richardson RS,
Wagner H,
De Rosa M,
and
Wagner PD.
Effects of inhaled nitric oxide on gas exchange in lungs with shunt or poorly ventilated areas.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
156:
484-491,
1997
13.
Hopkins, SR,
and
McKenzie DC.
Hypoxic ventilatory response and arterial desaturation during heavy work.
J Appl Physiol
67:
1119-1124,
1989
14.
Hopkins, SR,
McKenzie DC,
Schoene RB,
Glenny RW,
and
Robertson HT.
Pulmonary gas exchange during exercise in athletes. I. Ventilation-perfusion mismatch and diffusion limitation.
J Appl Physiol
77:
912-917,
1994
15.
Hurford, WE.
The biological basis for inhaled nitric oxide.
Resp Care Clin N Am
3:
357-369,
1997.
16.
Kacmarek, RM.
Update on the use of inhaled nitric oxide.
Can Resp J
3:
373-376,
1996.
17.
Koizumi, T,
Gupta R,
Banerjee M,
and
Newman JH.
Changes in pulmonary vascular tone during exercise: effects of nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibition, L-arginine infusion and NO inhalation.
J Clin Invest
94:
2275-2282,
1994.
18.
Lawler, J,
Powers SK,
and
Thompson D.
Linear relationship between
O2 max and
O2 max decrement during exposure to acute hypoxia.
J Appl Physiol
64:
1486-1492,
1988
19.
Moinard, J,
Manier G,
Pillet O,
and
Castaing Y.
Effect of inhaled nitric oxide on hemodynamics and
A/
inequalities in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
149:
1482-1487,
1994[Abstract].
20.
Otis, AB.
The work of breathing.
In: Handbook of Physiology. Respiration. Washington, DC: Am. Physiol. Soc, 1964, sect. 3, vol. 1, chapt. 17, p. 463-476.
21.
Pison, U,
Lopez FA,
Heidelmeyer CF,
Rossaint R,
and
Falke K.
Inhaled nitric oxide reverses hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction without impairing gas exchange.
J Appl Physiol
74:
1287-1292,
1993
22.
Powers, SK,
Martin D,
Cicale M,
Collop N,
Huang D,
and
Criswell D.
Exercise-induced hypoxemia in athletes: role of inadequate hyperventilation.
Eur J Appl Physiol
65:
37-42,
1992.
23.
Prefaut, C,
Anselme-Poujol F,
and
Caillaud C.
Inhibition of histamine release by nedocromil sodium reduces exercise-induced hypoxemia in master athletes.
Med Sci Sports Exerc
29:
10-16,
1997[ISI][Medline].
24.
Putensen, C,
Rasanen J,
and
Lopez FA.
Improvement in
A/
distributions during inhalation of nitric oxide in pigs with methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
151:
116-122,
1995[Abstract].
25.
Rossaint, R,
Falke KJ,
Lopez F,
Slama K,
Pison U,
and
Zapol WM.
Inhaled nitric oxide for the adult respiratory distress syndrome.
N Engl J Med
328:
399-405,
1993
26.
Schaffartzik, W,
Poole DC,
Derion T,
Tsukimoto K,
Hogan MC,
Arcos JP,
Bebout DE,
and
Wagner PD.
A/
distribution during exercise and recovery in humans: implications for pulmonary edema.
J Appl Physiol
72:
1657-1667,
1992
27.
Scherrer, U,
Vollenweider L,
Delabays A,
Savic M,
Eichenberger U,
Gian-Reto K,
Fikrle A,
Ballmer P,
Nicod P,
and
Bartsch P.
Inhaled nitric oxide for high altitude pulmonary edema.
N Engl J Med
334:
624-629,
1996
28.
Ward, JPT,
and
Aaronson PI.
Mechanisms of hypoxic vasoconstriction.
Respir Physiol
115:
261-271,
1999[ISI][Medline].
29.
West, JB,
and
Mathieu-Costello O.
Structure, strength, failure, and remodeling of the pulmonary blood-gas barrier.
Annu Rev Physiol
61:
543-572,
1999[ISI][Medline].
30.
West, JB,
Tsukimoto K,
Mathieu-Costello O,
and
Prediletto R.
Stress failure in pulmonary capillaries.
J Appl Physiol
70:
1731-1742,
1991
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. S. Zavorsky and J. M. Murias A small amount of inhaled nitric oxide does not increase lung diffusing capacity Eur. Respir. J., June 1, 2006; 27(6): 1251 - 1257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. van der Lee, P. Zanen, and G. S. Zavorsky Diffusion Capacity for Nitric Oxide and Carbon Monoxide Chest, November 1, 2004; 126(5): 1708 - 1710. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Zavorsky, K. B. Quiron, P. S. Massarelli, and L. C. Lands The Relationship Between Single-Breath Diffusion Capacity of the Lung for Nitric Oxide and Carbon Monoxide During Various Exercise Intensities Chest, March 1, 2004; 125(3): 1019 - 1027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Rohrig, R. Kuhlen, J. Baumert, and R. Rossaint Replacement of physiologically autoinhaled nitric oxide in intubated patients Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2003; 21(4): 677 - 681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Manohar, T. E. Goetz, and A. S. Hassan Nitric oxide synthase inhibition does not affect the exercise-induced arterial hypoxemia in Thoroughbred horses J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2001; 91(3): 1105 - 1112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |