|
|
||||||||
Departments of 1 Surgery, 2 Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, and 3 Physiology and Biophysics, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In experimental hypercholesterolemia, endothelium-dependent relaxations decrease, as does endothelial immunoreactivity for nitric oxide (NO) synthase (NOS; eNOS) in coronary arteries. Systemic levels of NO also decrease with concomitant elevations in systemic circulating levels of endothelin (ET)-1. Chronic treatment of hypercholesterolemic pigs with ET-receptor antagonists increases circulating NO and improves endothelium-dependent relaxations. Mechanisms causing these increases are not known. Therefore, experiments were designed to test the hypothesis that chronic administration of ET-receptor antagonists to hypercholesterolemic pigs increases NO production through increases in NOS activity. Female juvenile pigs were fed a 2% cholesterol atherogenic diet and were randomly allocated to receive no treatment (controls), a selective ETA-receptor antagonist (ABT-624), or a combined ETA + ETB-receptor antagonist (RO-48-5695) daily for 12 wk. After 12 wk, endothelial cells from thoracic aorta were prepared for measurement of eNOS mRNA or eNOS activity. Total cholesterol, low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol, and concentrations of ET-1 were significantly higher in all three groups at 12 wk compared with baseline levels. Circulating plasma-oxidized products of NO (NOx) increased with ET-receptor blockade. NOS mRNA was similar among groups. Total and Ca-dependent NOS activity was significantly higher in aortic endothelial cells from the ETA + ETB-treated pigs compared with those treated with ETA antagonist alone. These results suggest that changes in systemic NOx after chronic inhibition of ETA + ETB receptors in hypercholesterolemia may result from posttranscriptional changes in NOS.
atherosclerosis; endothelial cells; endothelin-1; lipidemia; messenger ribonucleic acid
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
THE BALANCE BETWEEN endothelium-derived nitric oxide (NO) and endothelin-1 (ET-1) may contribute to altered vasomotor function in pathophysiological states, including hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis (11). For example, in experimental hypercholesterolemia, circulating levels of ET-1 increase, whereas circulating levels of plasma oxidized products of NO (NOx) decrease (2, 3). At the level of the coronary arteries, endothelium-dependent relaxations are reduced, as is immunoreactivity for endothelial NO synthase (NOS; eNOS) (2, 13). These observations, taken together with reductions in contractions to infusion of the arginine analog NG-monomethyl-L-arginine, provide indirect evidence that activity of NO synthase (NOS) decreases with hypercholesterolemia (13). Chronic inhibition of hypercholesterolemic pigs with antagonists for ETA receptors or combined inhibition of ETA plus ETB receptors increases circulating levels of NO and restores endothelium-dependent relaxations and immunostaining for NOS in coronary arteries of pigs (2, 3). Whether endothelin-receptor antagonists affect changes in NOS at the transcriptional or posttranscriptional level is unclear. Therefore, experiments were designed to extend observational studies of changes in NOx and NOS immunostaining by directly determining changes in mRNA for endothelial NO and enzyme activity in the setting of chronic hypercholesterolemia and endothelin-receptor blockade. It was hypothesized that chronic endothelin-receptor blockade in hypercholesterolemia would increase activity of eNOS.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals.
All study procedures using animals were reviewed and approved by the
Mayo Foundation Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and were
designed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health
Guidelines. Female juvenile domestic crossbred pigs (23-35 kg)
were placed on an atherogenic diet of 2% cholesterol and 15% lard by
weight (TD-93296; Harlan Teklad, Madison, WI; Table
1) for 12 wk (11).
The mean nitrate concentration is 8.1 parts/million (range
0.1-22), and nitrite concentration is 1.8 parts/million (range
0.1-6.9). Animals were assigned to one of three groups. They
either did not receive any medications (control group), or were treated
with oral ABT-627 (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL), an
ETA receptor antagonist, on a weight-adjusted scale to maintain a dose of 4 mg · kg
1 · day
1, or were
treated with oral RO-48-5696 (Hoffman-LaRoche, Basel, Switzerland), a
combined ETA plus ETB-receptor antagonist, on a
weight-adjusted scale every 3 wk to maintain the dose at 3 mg · kg
1 · day
1 (2,
3, 16, 19). After 12 wk of treatment, hearts and aorta were
removed for study. Responses of the coronary arteries from these
animals were studied in separate experiments (2, 3).
Endothelial cells were scraped from the aorta of each animal and
prepared either for measurement of activity of eNOS or mRNA for eNOS.
Because of technical problems, aortic endothelial cells were obtained
from only three of seven control animals (2, 3).
|
Plasma assays. Plasma was collected at baseline and after 12 wk of treatment. Total cholesterol, high-density-lipoprotein (HDL), low-density-lipoprotein (LDL), triglyceride levels, plasma ET-1, and NOx were measured as previously described (2, 3).
Quantitation of mRNA for NOS. RT-PCR was performed on RNA extracted from thoracic aortic endothelial cells. Endothelial cells were scraped from the luminal surface of aortas and then stored in 1 ml of RNA STAT-60 (TEL-TEST "B"). Total RNA was then extracted with 0.2 ml chloroform and precipitated with 0.5 ml isopropanol. The supernatant was removed, and the RNA pellet was washed with 1 ml of 75% ethanol, air dried, and reconstituted in diethyl pyrocarbonate-treated water. RNA concentration was determined by measuring absorbance at 260 nm in a spectrophotometer (Beckman DU 640, Fullerton, CA). DNase treatment of 1 µg of total RNA was carried out with 1 µl of DNase buffer (200 mM Tris · HCl at pH 8.4, 500 mM KCl, 20 mM MgCl2) and 2 µl of amplification-grade DNase I (Life Technologies) for 15 min at room temperature. DNase I was then inactivated by heating to 65°C after the addition of 1 µl of 25 mM EDTA. First-strand cDNA synthesis was next performed (Superscript Preamplification System, Life Technologies) by sequential reactions after the addition of 1 µl of oligo(dT)12-18 primers to hybridize to 3' poly(A) tails on mRNA (70°C for 10 min) and then 7 µl of reaction mixture (2 µl 10× PCR buffer, 2 µl 25 mM MgCl2, 1 µl dNTP mix, and 2 µl 0.1 M dithiothreitol at 42°C for 5 min) and 1 µl of Superscript II RT (42°C for 50 min). Reaction was terminated by heating to 70°C for 15 min followed by incubation with RNase H for 20 min at 37°C. Target cDNA was next amplified by PCR: 38 cycles of denaturation (94°C for 45 s), annealing (60°C for 45 s), and polymerization (72°C for 60 s). The primers used detected eNOS (transfected and endogenous): 5' primer (TCA ACC AGT ACT ACA GCT CC) and 3' primer (GTG GTT GCA GAT GTA GGT GA). A 251-bp product was visualized on 2% agarose gel electrophoresis.
The cDNA was next quantified by using the PCR MIMIC technique (Clontech Labs, Palo Alto, CA). A MIMIC DNA was constructed by performing two rounds of PCR amplification. In the first reaction, two composite primers, 5'-TCA ACC AGT ACT ACA GCT CCC GCA AGT GAA ATC TCC TCC G and 3'-GTG GTT GCA GAT GTA GGT GAT CTG TCA ATG CAG TTT GTA G, were used, each containing the target gene primer sequence attached to a nucleotide strand designed to hybridize to opposite strands of a MIMIC DNA fragment. A dilution of this reaction was then amplified again by using only the gene-specific primers. The MIMIC DNA was next purified by passage through CHROMA SPIN+TE-100 columns, and the yield was calculated and diluted to 100 amol/µl. Competitive PCR amplification was next performed by titrating 1 µl of the target cDNA against serial 10-fold dilutions of the MIMIC DNA with the use of the eNOS 5'-TCA ACC AGT ACT ACA GCT CC and eNOS 3'-GTG GTT GCA GAT GTA GT CA and 35 cycles of denaturation (94°C for 30 s), annealing (63°C for 30 s), and polymerization (72°C for 30 s). PCR products were analyzed by ethidium bromide-stained 1.6% agarose gel electrophoresis, and bands of cDNA and MIMIC DNA of equal intensity were identified by visual inspection. Competitive PCR was next performed by titrating 1 µl of the target cDNA against serial twofold dilutions of this MIMIC DNA dilution in the manner described above. The final target cDNA concentration was then estimated by the known concentration in the MIMIC DNA band of equal intensity.Activity of NOS. NOS activity was determined by measuring the conversion of L-[3H]arginine to L-[3H]citrulline by methods originally described by Myatt et al. (18) and modified by Miller and Barber (17). In brief, homogenates of aortic endothelial cells were prepared and eluted through 10-DG desalting columns. To quantitate eNOS activity, duplicate reactions were carried out in the presence of calcium (total activity), in the absence of calcium plus EGTA (calcium-independent activity), and in the absence of calcium plus EGTA in the presence of NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (nonspecific activity). Reactions were started by adding 150 µl of cofactor mix. The reaction was incubated on a shaker at 37°C for 1 h and terminated by the addition of ice-cold stop buffer. Separation of L-[3H]arginine from L-[3H]citrulline was accomplished by using affinity column containing AG 50S-X8 Na+ form 200- to 400-mesh resin (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Calcium-dependent activity (eNOS) equals total activity after correcting for nonspecific activity.
Statistical analysis. All values are expressed as means ± SE. Analysis of variance followed by correction for repeated measures (Bonferroni correction) was used to analyze data with a Gaussian distribution. A Kruskal-Wallis test followed by pairwise comparisons of distributions using a Mann-Whitney U-test was used to analyze the quantified PCR results that had a non-Gaussian distribution. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals and blood chemistry.
All pigs gained weight during the 12 wk of high-cholesterol diet
[77.3 ± 1.6 kg at baseline (n = 17), to
149.0 ± 5.8 kg in control animals (n = 3),
117.1 ± 2.8 kg in the ETA-antagonist-treated group
(n = 8), and 121.7 ± 3.6 kg in the
ETA plus ETB-treated group (n = 6)]. Total cholesterol, HDL, and LDL increased significantly in all
groups. Increases in total cholesterol, LDL, and HDL were not affected
by endothelin-receptor antagonists (Table
2).
|
|
Quantitation of mRNA for eNOS.
Quantitative RT-PCR performed on RNA extracted from the aortic
endothelial cells showed no significant differences in the mRNA levels
for eNOS among groups [control: 0.0250 ± 0.0125 amol/µl (n = 3); ETA blocked: 0.0424 ± 0.017 amol/µl (n = 8); ETA plus ETB
blocked: 0.03708 ± 0.0197 amol/µl (n = 6); Fig.
1; P value for the exact
version of the Kruskal-Wallis test was 0.9420].
|
NOS activity.
Citrulline accumulation from total and calcium-dependent NOS enzyme was
greater in cells from cholesterol-fed pigs treated with ETA
plus ETB antagonists compared with those treated with ETA-receptor antagonists alone (Fig.
2). Calcium-independent NOS enzyme
accumulation was similar in all three groups [control: 144.8 ± 78.2 pmol · mg
protein
1 · h
1 (n = 3); ETA blocked: 116.3 ± 87.1 pmol · mg
protein
1 · h
1 (n = 8); ETA plus ETB blocked: 127.6 ± 50.6 pmol · mg
protein
1 · h
1
(n = 6)].
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous studies have demonstrated that high-cholesterol feeding of pigs increases plasma cholesterol and ET-1 with concomitant decreases in plasma NOx and endothelium-dependent relaxations in coronary arteries (2, 3, 13). Furthermore, chronic treatment of hypercholesterolemic pigs with endothelin-receptor antagonists improves endothelium-dependent relaxations of coronary arteries and attenuates decreases in plasma NOx (2, 13). These observations suggest indirectly that endothelin-receptor antagonism increases activity of NOS (2, 3). Results of the present study extend these observations to provide direct evidence that combined chronic antagonism of ETA and ETB receptors results in increased eNOS enzyme activity (as defined by citrulline accumulation at a single time point) in pigs with hypercholesterolemia. Increases in eNOS activity would account in part for increases in plasma NOx in animals with combined endothelin-receptor antagonism and improved endothelium-dependent relaxation (3). It is important to note that increases in NOS activity were due to an increase in calcium-dependent activity and not the calcium-independent activity typically defining activity of inducible NOS. This probably represents, in part, posttranscriptional regulation of the enzyme, as mRNA for eNOS was similar between the tissue from animals receiving ETA and ETA plus ETB antagonists. However, NOS activity was significantly greater in the group receiving ETA plus ETB antagonist compared with the group receiving only ETA-receptor antagonists. These data should not be interpreted to mean that endothelin-receptor antagonists would not influence transcription for eNOS, as only a single time point was studied. Indeed, 12 wk of treatment may represent a "steady-state" condition and may not be indicative of changes in message at earlier time points after treatment.
Posttranscriptional regulation of eNOS could include changes in intracellular regulation of calcium by phosphoinosital as occurs in hypertension (24), autocrine regulatory systems associated with production or release of other endothelium-derived factors such as prostaglandin or adrenomedullin (15), or changes in oxidative stress (3, 9).
It is unlikely that changes in circulating NOx represented changes in dietary intake of nitrate and nitrites. All pigs received the same diet, and pigs with the highest plasma NOx (those treated with ETA plus ETB antagonist) actually weighed less than the control pigs, which would suggest less dietary intake of nitrates and nitrites.
A shortcoming of this study is that NOS activity was determined in aortic rather than coronary endothelial cells. Coronary arteries from these animals were used for functional studies (2, 3). Heterogeneity in distribution of NO and ET-1 throughout the vasculature is well recognized. Although NOS activity and mRNA were not measured in coronary arterial endothelial cells, it should be pointed out that changes in circulating NOx and ET-1 probably represent mean production and secretion from several vascular beds. Increases in NOS activity in aortic endothelial cells of animals treated with the ETA plus ETB antagonists are consistent with increases in systemic concentrations of NOx and increases in functional expression of endothelium-dependent responses observed in the coronary arteries (2, 3). Therefore, chronic endothelin-receptor antagonism is likely to affect endothelin receptors and NOS activity throughout the vasculature.
ETA receptors are located on vascular smooth muscle cells, whereas ETB receptors are located on both endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells (12, 21, 23). Stimulation of ETB receptors has been associated with release of NO from the endothelium in experimental animals and humans (4, 5, 8, 10, 20, 22). Therefore, it is unclear how antagonism of ETB receptors would act to maintain NOx in the setting of hypercholesterolemia. In hypercholesterolemia, there is an enhanced vasoconstrictor response to the selective ETB agonist sarafotoxin in the coronary microcirculation (14). In support of this observation, there was a trend, albeit statistically insignificant, for increases in both ETB-receptor affinity and number in conduit coronary arteries with hypercholesterolemia (14). Although the receptor-binding assay did not differentiate receptors on the smooth muscle or endothelial cells, data suggest that there are changes in ETB receptors in hypercholesterolemia. Clearly, additional experiments are needed to better define regulation of endothelin-receptor subtypes, their distribution, affinity for both agonists and antagonists, and intracellular signaling pathways in hypercholesterolemia.
Antagonism of ETA plus ETB receptors but not ETA receptors alone also increased plasma ET-1. This result is consistent with previous studies demonstrating a negative feedback between the stimulation of ETB receptors and the half-life of exogenously administered ET-1 (6). The increase in ET-1 concentrations in ETA plus ETB-blocked animals suggests that ETB-receptor binding may be an important mechanism in clearance of endogenous ET-1. The relationship between clearance of ET-1 and regulation of NOS remains to be defined. Chronic administration of exogenous ET-1 has been shown to increase NO-dependent reactivity of resistance vessels in rats (7).
In summary, in hypercholesterolemia, plasma ET-1 increases, whereas plasma NOx decreases. Chronic antagonism of ETA and ETB receptors attenuates the decrease in plasma NOx associated with hypercholesterolemia. The greatest restoration in plasma NOx was observed during simultaneous blockade of both ETA plus ETB receptors, a treatment that further elevated circulating concentrations of ET-1. After 12 wk of treatment, mRNA for eNOS was similar between animals treated with the ETA-receptor antagonist alone and those treated with ETA plus ETB antagonist. However, because NOS activity increased only with ETA plus ETB antagonist, this suggests that ETB receptors are associated with posttranscriptional regulation of NOS in hypercholesterolemia.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Training Grant HL-07111-21D (to P. J. M. Best); the Miami Heart Research Institute (to A. Lerman); the Bruce and Ruth Rappaport Program in Vascular Biology (to A. Lerman and V. M. Miller); and the Mayo Foundation (to all authors).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: V. M. Miller, Depts. of Surgery, and Physiology and Biophysics, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905 (E-mail: miller.virginia{at}mayo.edu).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 5 July 2000; accepted in final form 22 September 2000.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Bacon, CR,
Cary NR,
and
Davenport AP.
Endothelin peptide and receptors in human atherosclerotic coronary artery and aorta.
Circ Res
79:
794-801,
1996
2.
Best, PJM,
Lerman LO,
Romero JC,
Richardson D,
Holmes DR, Jr,
and
Lerman A.
Coronary endothelial function is preserved with chronic endothelin receptor antagonism in experimental hypercholesterolemia in vitro.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol
19:
2769-2775,
1999
3.
Best, PJM,
McKenna CJ,
Hasdai D,
Holmes DR,
and
Lerman A.
Chronic endothelin receptor antagonism preserves coronary endothelial function in experimental hypercholesterolemia.
Circulation
99:
1747-1752,
1999
4.
Cardillo, C,
Kilcoyne CM,
Cannon RO, III,
and
Panza JA.
Interactions between nitric oxide and endothelin in the regulation of vascular tone of human resistance vessels in vivo.
Hypertension
35:
1237-1241,
2000
5.
Fujitani, Y,
Ueda H,
Okada T,
Urade Y,
and
Karaki H.
A selective agonist of endothelin type B receptor, IRL 1620, stimulates cyclic GMP increase via nitric oxide formation in rat aorta.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
267:
683-689,
1993
6.
Fukuroda, T,
Fujikawa T,
Ozaki S,
Ishikawa K,
and
Yano M.
Clearance of circulating endothelin-1 by ETB receptor in rats.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
199:
1461-1465,
1994[Web of Science][Medline].
7.
Henrion, D,
Iglarz M,
and
Lévy BI.
Chronic endothelin-1 improves nitric oxide-dependent flow-induced dilation in resistance arteries from normotensive and hypertensive rats.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol
19:
2148-2153,
1999
8.
Hirata, Y,
Emori T,
Eguchi S,
Kanno K,
Imai T,
Ohta K,
and
Marumo F.
Endothelin receptor subtype B mediates synthesis of nitric oxide by cultured bovine endothelial cells.
J Clin Invest
91:
1367-1373,
1993.
9.
Jougasaki, M,
Schirger JA,
Simari RD,
and
Burnett JC, Jr.
Autocrine role for the endothelin-B receptor in the secretion of adrenomedullin.
Hypertension
32:
917-922,
1998
10.
Kakoki, M,
Hirata Y,
Hayakawa H,
Tojo A,
Nagata D,
Suzuki E,
Kimura K,
Goto A,
Kikuchi K,
Nagano T,
and
Omata M.
Effects of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hypercholesterolemia on endothelin type B receptor-mediated nitric oxide release from rat kidney.
Circulation
99:
1242-1248,
1999
11.
Lerman, A,
Webster MW,
Chesebro JH,
Edwards WD,
Wei C,
Fuster V,
and
Burnett JC, Jr.
Endothelin: circulating and tissue endothelin immunoreactivity in hypercholesterolemic pigs.
Circulation
88:
2923-2928,
1993
12.
Levin, ER.
Mechanisms of disease: endothelins.
N Engl J Med
333:
356-363,
1995
13.
Mathew, V,
Cannan CR,
Miller VM,
Barber DA,
Hasdai D,
Schwartz RS,
Holmes RH,
and
Lerman A.
Enhanced endothelin-mediated coronary vasoconstriction and attenuated basal nitric oxide activity in experimental hypercholesterolemia.
Circulation
96:
1930-1936,
1997
14.
Mathew, V,
Miller VM,
Hasdai D,
Barber DA,
Holmes DR,
and
Lerman A.
Enhanced coronary effects of endothelin-B receptor stimulation in experimental hypercholesterolemia.
Coronary Art Dis
11:
585-592,
2000[Web of Science][Medline].
15.
Matsuda, H,
Beppu S,
Ohmori F,
Yamada M,
and
Miyatake K.
Involvement of cyclo-oxygenase-generated vasodilating eicosanoid(s) in addition to nitric oxide in endothelin-1 induced endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation in guinea pig aorta.
Heart Vessels
8:
121-127,
1993[Web of Science][Medline].
16.
McKenna, CJ,
Burke SE,
Opgenorth TJ,
Padley RJ,
Camrud LJ,
Camrud AR,
Johnson J,
Carlson PJ,
Lerman A,
Holmes DR,
and
Schwartz RS.
Selective ETA receptor antagonism reduces intimal hyperplasia in a porcine coronary stent model.
Circulation
97:
2551-2556,
1998
17.
Miller, VM,
and
Barber DA.
Modulation of endothelium-derived nitric oxide in canine femoral veins.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
271:
H668-H673,
1996
18.
Myatt, L,
Brockman DE,
Langsdon G,
and
Pollock JS.
Constitutive calcium-dependent isoform of nitric oxide synthase in the human placental villous vascular tree.
Placenta
14:
373-383,
1993[Web of Science][Medline].
19.
Neidhart, W,
Brece V,
Burri K,
Clozel M,
Hirth G,
Klinkhamer U,
Giller T,
and
Ramuz H.
Discovery of RO-485695; a potent mixed endothelin receptor antagonist optimized for bosentan.
Bioorg Med Chem Lett
7:
2223-2228,
1997.
20.
Pernow, J,
and
Modin A.
Endothelial regulation of coronary vascular tone in vitro: contribution of endothelin receptor subtypes and nitric oxide.
Eur J Pharmacol
243:
281-286,
1993[Web of Science][Medline].
21.
Sakurai, T,
Yanagisawa M,
and
Masaki T.
Molecular characterization of the endothelin receptors.
Trends Pharmacol Sci
13:
103-108,
1992[Medline].
22.
Tsukahara, H,
Ende H,
Magazine HI,
Bahou WF,
and
Golino P.
Molecular and functional characterization of the nonisopeptide-selective ETB receptor in endothelial cells. Receptor coupling to nitric oxide synthase.
J Biol Chem
269:
21778-21785,
1994
23.
Yanagisawa, M,
Kurihara H,
Kimura S,
Tomobe Y,
Kobayashi M,
Mitsui Y,
Yuzaki Y,
Goto K,
and
Masaki T.
A novel potent vasoconstrictor peptide produced by vascular endothelial cells.
Nature
332:
411-415,
1988[Medline].
24.
Yokokawa K, Kohno M, Minami M, Ikeda M, Horio T, Kano H, Hanehira T,
Yasunari K, and Takeda T. Enhanced phosphoinositide turnover
signaling stimulated by endothelin B-type receptor in endothelial cells
from spontaneously hypertensive rats. Clin Genet
S195-S196, 1995.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Bohm and J. Pernow The importance of endothelin-1 for vascular dysfunction in cardiovascular disease Cardiovasc Res, October 1, 2007; 76(1): 8 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. E. Girgis, H. C. Champion, G. B. Diette, R. A. Johns, S. Permutt, and J. T. Sylvester Decreased Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Response to Bosentan Therapy Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 1, 2005; 172(3): 352 - 357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Sosin, G. S. Bhatia, R. C. Davis, and G. Y.H. Lip Heart failure--the importance of ethnicity Eur J Heart Fail, December 1, 2004; 6(7): 831 - 843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Mather, A. Lteif, H. O. Steinberg, and A. D. Baron Interactions Between Endothelin and Nitric Oxide in the Regulation of Vascular Tone in Obesity and Diabetes Diabetes, August 1, 2004; 53(8): 2060 - 2066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Thirunavukkarasu, Y Yang, V M Subbotin, S A K Harvey, J Fung, and C R Gandhi Endothelin receptor antagonist TAK-044 arrests and reverses the development of carbon tetrachloride induced cirrhosis in rats Gut, July 1, 2004; 53(7): 1010 - 1019. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. T. Gonon, D. Erbas, A. Broijersen, G. Valen, and J. Pernow Nitric oxide mediates protective effect of endothelin receptor antagonism during myocardial ischemia and reperfusion Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2004; 286(5): H1767 - H1774. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |