Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 90: 486-492, 2001;
8750-7587/01 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (20)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schubert, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Guttmann, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schubert, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Guttmann, J.
Vol. 90, Issue 2, 486-492, February 2001

CO2-controlled sampling of alveolar gas in mechanically ventilated patients

Jochen K. Schubert, Karl-Heinz Spittler, Guenther Braun, Klaus Geiger, and Josef Guttmann

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Freiburg, Hugstetter Strasse 55, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

A newly designed gas-sampling device using end-tidal CO2 to separate dead space gas from alveolar gas was evaluated in 12 mechanically ventilated patients. For that purpose, CO2-controlled sampling was compared with mixed expiratory sampling. Alveolar sampling valves were easily controlled via CO2 concentration. Concentrations of four volatile substances were determined in the expired and inspired gas. Isoflurane and isoprene, which did not occur in the inspired air, had ratios of end-tidal to mixed expired concentrations of 1.75 and 1.81, respectively. Acetone and pentane, found in both the inspired and expired air, showed ratios of 0.96 and 1.0, respectively. Precision of concentration measurements was between 2.4% (isoprene) and 11.2% (isoflurane); reproducibility (as coefficient of variation) was 5%. Because the only possible source of isoflurane and isoprene in this setting was patients' blood, selective enrichment of alveolar gas was demonstrated. By using the new sampling technique, sensitivity of breath analysis was nearly doubled.

acetone; breath analysis; isoflurane; isoprene; pentane


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

CONCENTRATIONS OF VOLATILE substances in blood are reflected in their concentrations in the exhaled air because blood concentrations relate to alveolar concentrations by their blood-gas partition coefficient or solubility. Constituents of patients' exhaled gas include volatile anesthetics, acetone, n-pentane, and isoprene. Volatile anesthetics such as isoflurane are exhaled for a long period after exposure during anesthesia (2, 3, 8). Acetone is formed by decarboxylation of acetoacetate, pentane arises from peroxidation of n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (6), and isoprene (2-methylbutadiene-1,3) is thought to be formed along the mevalonic pathway of cholesterol synthesis (26). Exhalation of acetone, pentane, and isoprene has been related to metabolic disorders, inflammatory reactions (7, 9, 10, 12-14, 16, 17, 25, 28) and certain diseases such as acute respiratory distress syndrome and pneumonia (24). Results, however, are conflicting, and a systematic and reliable correlation between the composition of patients' exhaled air and their clinical status has not yet been established. Substance concentrations of interest fall in the range of 10-12 to 10-9 mol/l. Because of these extremely low concentrations, quantitative chemical analysis of mixed exhaled gas may be affected considerably by errors due to dilution and contamination with dead space gas. In mechanically ventilated patients, dead space even comprises parts of the respiratory tubing that may contain additional contaminants. To analyze the relationship between chemical composition of exhaled gas and patients' clinical conditions, substance concentrations in alveolar gas must be determined because only alveolar concentrations reflect concentrations in blood. We therefore developed a sampling method using the expired CO2 to separate dead space gas from alveolar gas.

The purpose of this study was 1) to evaluate the CO2-controlled sampling method in mechanically ventilated patients and to test it with respect to efficacy of alveolar gas sampling and 2) to assess the effect of CO2-controlled sampling on the measurement of exhaled substance concentrations. For this purpose, four volatile substances of different origins were analyzed in the exhaled gas. Two of the volatile substances came predominantly from the patients' alveoli; the other two had measurable concentrations in the inspiratory gas. Results of CO2-controlled sampling were compared with those obtained by means of a mixed sampling method.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Patients. After approval by the local ethics committee and after informed consent by the patient or next of kin had been obtained, 12 patients (7 men, 5 women) were chosen randomly among the patients of our surgical intensive care unit. Ten patients had received isoflurane as an anesthetic. All patients were under controlled or assisted mechanical ventilation.

Gas sampling. A schematic drawing of the CO2-controlled sampling device is shown in Fig. 1. The sensor (cuvette) of a fast-responding infrared absorption mainstream CO2 analyzer (930, Siemens-Elema, Solna, Sweden; Fig. 1, no. 6) was inserted between the Y piece of the respiratory circuit and the patient. A stopcock (Fig. 1, no. 7) was mounted through a bore into the cuvette to prevent leakage of respiratory gas when the sampling system was not connected. The stopcock joined the cuvette with the electrically operated two-way valve (LFYA, Lee) and had an internal dead space of 88 µl (Fig. 1, no. 8). Adsorption traps (27) containing 80 mg of activated charcoal (Analyt, Müllheim, Germany) were mounted onto the two outlets of the valve. By means of a Y piece, the traps were connected to a roller pump (Model 7553-75, Cole-Parmer Instruments, Niles, IL) working at a constant flow of 200 ml/min (Fig. 1, no. 14). Volatile substances were collected and concentrated by adsorption onto the activated charcoal. Approximately 1 liter of exhaled gas was drawn through the traps by means of the roller pump. Sample volume and flow were measured by collecting the gas under water and recording the time of sampling. The preconcentrating effect of the charcoal was ~1,500-fold. One thousand milliliters of exhaled gas passed through the trap. Desorption took place in 2 s, and the gas flow through the trap during this period was 20 ml/min, i.e., the substances adsorbed on the charcoal were liberated into a volume of 2 s × 20 ml/ 60 s = 0.67 ml. Thus the cumulative sample volume-to-measured sample volume ratio was ~1,500/l. Precision and reproducibility of the preconcentration process have been evaluated in several studies (15, 22, 27). Relative standard deviations were <= 10%, and correlation coefficients for calibration curves were always found to be >0.95.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Schematic drawing of the CO2-controlled sampling device. 1, patient; 2, endotracheal tube; 3 and 4, respiratory tubing; 5, ventilator; 6, CO2 mainstream sensor; 7, stopcock; 8, electrical 2-way valve; 9, CO2 analyzer; 10, electronic processing unit; 11, trap; 12, alveolar sampling (expiratory) position; 13, mixed inspiratory and dead space sampling (inspiratory) position; 14, roller pump.

Depending on the position of the valve, respiratory gas exclusively passed through one of the adsorption traps (Fig. 1, no. 11). The analog output of the CO2 analyzer (Fig. 1, no. 9) was fed into the processing unit (Fig. 1, no. 10) that controlled the switching of the valve depending on the actual CO2 concentration. Figure 2 shows one expiratory section of a capnogram, including the switching points of the two-way valve. When the steeply increasing ramp of the capnogram exceeded a static threshold of 3.5 vol%, the valve was switched into "expiratory" position (Fig. 2A). The valve was switched into "inspiratory" position (Fig. 2B) when the CO2 concentration fell below 90% of the preceding maximum (Fig. 2C; dynamic threshold). Thus separation of alveolar gas from dead space and inspiratory gas was achieved by switching the two-way valve without stopping the pump. All parts of the apparatus coming into contact with respiratory gas were made of chemically inert material such as polytetrafluoroethylene.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Tracing of exhaled CO2 concentrations (vol% CO2) and switching points of the valve. A: start of alveolar sampling at a static threshold of 3.5%. B: end of alveolar sampling at 90% of the preceding maximum CO2 concentration. C: maximum CO2 concentration during alveolar phase. I, CO2 free inspiratory phase; II, mixing phase; III, alveolar phase.

Because sampling of the pure inspiratory gas was not possible by means of the valve used for this study, inspiratory gas had to be sampled from the inspiratory part of the circuit without using the valve. Figure 3 shows the location of the CO2-controlled sampling (alveolar) device in the respiratory circuit. An inspiratory and a mixed expiratory sampling port was introduced at the beginning of the inspiratory tubing and at the end of the expiratory tubing (sites 1 and 2 in Fig. 3). Because mixed expiratory sampling from site 2 was done continuously over more than one respiratory cycle, a mixture of dead space gas and alveolar gas was sampled.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Schematic drawing of the sampling devices mounted in the respiratory circuit showing the CO2-triggered sampling device and the T pieces for inspiratory (site 1) and mixed exhaled (site 2) sampling. CO2 conc, CO2 concentration.

Volatile substances were collected and preconcentrated through adsorption onto activated charcoal the same way as described for CO2-controlled sampling. Inspiratory and mixed expiratory sampling occurred over a 3- to 5-min span, whereas alveolar sampling required 6-22 min.

In four patients, the electrical output of the CO2 sensor and the switching impulses of the valve were recorded simultaneously. Figure 4 represents data from four consecutive breaths of one patient. Twenty single breaths per patient were analyzed. From these recordings, CO2 concentrations corresponding to switching points of the valve and maximum expiratory and end-tidal CO2 concentrations were determined graphically (Fig. 4). Estimates of arterial tracer gas partial pressures were derived from the ratio of end-tidal to arterial CO2 partial pressures. Arterial blood concentrations could then be derived from blood/gas partition coefficients or solubility
P<SC>et</SC><SUB>tracer gas</SUB><IT>/</IT>Pa<SUB>tracer gas</SUB><IT>≈</IT>P<SC>et</SC><SUB>CO<SUB>2</SUB></SUB><IT>/</IT>Pa<SUB>CO<SUB>2</SUB></SUB><IT> ⇒</IT>

Pa<SUB>tracer gas</SUB><IT>≈</IT>P<SC>et</SC><SUB>tracer gas</SUB> (Pa<SUB>CO<SUB>2</SUB></SUB><IT>/</IT>P<SC>et</SC><SUB>CO<SUB>2</SUB></SUB>)

Cblood<SUB>tracer gas</SUB><IT>≈</IT>P<SC>et</SC><SUB>tracer gas</SUB><IT> ∗ </IT>(Pa<SUB>CO<SUB>2</SUB></SUB><IT>/</IT>P<SC>et</SC><SUB>CO<SUB>2</SUB></SUB>)<IT> ∗ k</IT><SUB>solubility</SUB> (Henry's law)

or Cblood<SUB>tracer gas</SUB><IT>≈</IT>C<SC>et</SC><SUB>tracer gas</SUB><IT> ∗ </IT>(Pa<SUB>CO<SUB>2</SUB></SUB><IT>/</IT>P<SC>et</SC><SUB>CO<SUB>2</SUB></SUB>)<IT> ∗ k</IT><SUB>blood<IT>/</IT>gas</SUB>
where PET is end-tidal partial pressure, Pa is arterial partial pressure, Cblood is blood concentration, and CET is end-tidal concentration of the subscripted gases; ksolubility and kblood/gas are solubility and blood-gas partition coefficients, respectively.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Simultaneous tracing of electrical impulses generated by the processing unit for switching the 2-way valve in mV (upper curve) and of analog CO2 analyzer output in mV and vol% CO2, respectively (lower curve) in a patient (8 in Table 1) under assisted mechanical ventilation. a, Beginning and b, end of alveolar sampling. I, CO2 free inspiratory phase; II, mixing phase; III, alveolar phase; CO2max, maximum alveolar CO2 concentration; t, time.

Gas chromatographic analysis. Substances were desorbed from the activated charcoal by means of microwave energy (22), separated by gas chromatography, detected by flame ionization detection, and identified by mass spectrometry. In this study, two substances coming predominantly from the patient [isoflurane (23) and isoprene (24)] and two substances having measurable concentrations in the inspiratory gas [acetone and pentane (24)] were investigated. Substance concentrations were obtained from calibration curves by using flame ionization detection data. Measurements were made at least in duplicate. Time of sampling, ventilator settings, and the patient's diagnoses were recorded. The analytical method has been described in more detail elsewhere (24).

Variation of the measured values, limits of detection, and precision. In a previous study, we performed an extensive testing of the device in the laboratory with respect to precision of CO2 measurement, speed, and reproducibility of valve switching. Furthermore, we evaluated the relationship between the response time of the intake valve and cyclical pressure changes within the ventilator tubing system. The response time of the valve did not change up to a clinical relevant pressure of 100 mbar. The switching time of the intake valve is 18 ms.

Reproducibility of CO2-controlled gas sampling was assessed by analyzing the CO2 concentrations corresponding to the switching points of the valve. The coefficient of variation for the recognition of the switching thresholds was <= 2.5%. To assess the reproducibility of the analytical method, the coefficient of variation for expiratory isoflurane concentrations was calculated. For this purpose, samples were collected in quadruplicate on different traps from three patients. The mean coefficient of variation of the isoflurane concentration was 5% (23). Limits of detection were estimated on the basis of the signal-to-noise ratios obtained with standards containing the compounds of interest at low concentration levels. Standard mixtures were prepared and analyzed as described by Schubert et al. (24). The limit of detection was defined as that concentration of an analyte that produced a signal three times greater than the baseline noise.

Five replicate measurements were performed by use of multicomponent standards of the same concentration. Precision was assessed by calculating the mean, standard deviation, and relative standard deviation of the observed values.

Statistical analysis. Because substance concentrations were not normally distributed, the Friedman test followed by a Student-Newman-Keuls test was applied for multiple comparisons within patient groups. A P value <0.05 was considered significant. Results are given as medians and 25-75% percentiles. CO2 concentrations determined from sensor recordings were normally distributed, and results are given as means ± SD.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Patients' demographic data, main diagnoses, ventilator type, and mode of mechanical ventilation are listed in Table 1. A reliable identification of the alveolar phase was observed by simultaneously analyzing the CO2 concentrations measured at the Y piece of the respiratory circuit and the electrical switching impulses of the valve (Figs. 2 and 4). The valve was switched into expiratory position at a mean expiratory CO2 concentration of 3.3 ± 0.1% (mean ± SD). Switching into the inspiratory position occurred when CO2 concentration had fallen by 90 ± 3% of the immediately preceding maximum. In patients 6, 7, and 12, estimates of isoflurane arterial concentrations were derived. Ratios of end-tidal to arterial CO2 partial pressure were 0.9, 1.0, and 0.6, respectively, in these patients. With standard conditions (volume = 22.4 l/mol) assumed, isoflurane blood concentrations were determined as 42.8, 25.7, and 135 nl/ml blood, respectively (blood-gas partition coefficient = 1.4).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Patients' main diagnoses and modes of ventilation

The maximum time necessary to sample one liter of alveolar gas was 22 min in a patient who was tachypneic (27 breaths/min).

Tables 2 and 3 summarize the results obtained by means of mixed expiratory sampling and CO2-controlled sampling. In all patients, isoflurane and isoprene concentrations were higher in the CO2-controlled samples than in the mixed expired samples (Table 2). Median expired isoflurane and isoprene concentrations were 1.75 (isoflurane) and 2 (isoprene) times higher in the CO2-controlled samples than in the mixed expired samples (Table 2). Expired acetone and pentane concentrations were not different in the CO2-controlled and the mixed expired samples (Table 3). Inspired isoprene and isoflurane concentrations were at the limit of detection. Inspired pentane and acetone concentrations were at 10-50% of the expired concentrations.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.   Expired isoflurane and isoprene concentrations in the individual patients


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3.   Expired acetone and pentane concentrations

Limits of detection for n-pentane, isoprene, acetone, and isoflurane were 0.10, 0.20, 0.15, and 0.95 nmol/l, respectively; precision (as relative SD) was 4.05, 2.4, 9.2, and 11.2%, respectively. Calibration plots of all substances were linear in the investigated range. Correlation coefficients were between 0.943 and 0.997. Relative standard deviations of retention times on the gas chromatography column were <0.3% (n = 5).


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We found that alveolar gas sampling was reliable and precise with our newly designed CO2-triggered "alveolar" sampling valve. Alveolar sampling valves were easily controlled via CO2 concentration. Alveolar gas sampling started at 3.3 ± 0.1 vol% CO2 (25 ± 0.8 mmHg), which is in the range of mean ± 2 SD of the preset value of 3.5 vol%. By choosing a high value of 3.5% expired CO2 as the starting point of alveolar sampling, errors due to admixture of dead space gas are minimized. In patients showing a slow rise of expired CO2 concentration (e.g., in obstructive lung disease) or in patients who have low expired CO2 concentrations (e.g., during hyperventilation), sampling times are increased due to the late onset of alveolar sampling. If alveolar CO2 concentration is <3.5%, the device will not collect alveolar gas. In these cases, the threshold would have to be lowered by changing the internal settings of the prototype used for this study. Therefore, an adjustable onset of alveolar sampling is planned for future realizations of the apparatus.

Because no standard analytical method exists in breath analysis against which to compare new findings, it is impossible to compare "tested" values with "known" values. Internal standards can only be used in the analytical process, not in the patient, i.e., it is not possible to produce known substance concentrations in patients' exhaled air. Therefore, we tested the analytical process by using each patient as his or her own control, comparing measurements taken simultaneously with and without the new sampling device in the same patient.

Estimates of arterial tracer gas partial pressures may be derived from the ratio of end-tidal (alveolar) to arterial CO2 partial pressures. Arterial blood concentrations could then be derived from blood-gas partition coefficients or solubility. These estimates, however, will only be correct for substances that have a similar solubility to that of CO2 because end-tidal to arterial partial pressure ratios vary with ventilation and pulmonary perfusion according to the solubility of the volatile substances.

Linearity, precision, and limits of detection of the microwave desorption/flame ionization detection method had been evaluated before (15). In a previous laboratory investigation, we did not find any influence of the ventilatory pattern on the performance of our CO2-controlled valve. However, in the present study, the number of patients was too small to analyze the systematic effects of the disease state on the performance of our setup.

Although the analytical settings were identical, only two of the four volatile substances analyzed in this study were enriched by the CO2-controlled sampling technique. The different behavior of these exhaled substances is due to different substance origins. As one would expect, alveolar concentrations are higher than mixed expired concentrations only for those substances originating predominantly from the patient, such as isoflurane or isoprene. Isoflurane is exhaled after exposure during anesthesia and could not be detected in the inspiratory gas of the ventilator systems (23). Isoprene is most probably generated along the mevalonic pathway of cholesterol synthesis (26), and concentrations in the gas delivery system were negligible (24). Substances having considerable concentrations in the inspiratory limb, such as acetone or pentane, were not enriched by CO2-triggered sampling compared with mixed expiratory sampling. Both substances were found in varying concentrations in background air, ventilator tubing, and gas delivery systems (11, 18, 19, 20,). Dead space concentrations of these substances add to alveolar concentrations, resulting in mixed expiratory concentrations equal to or even higher than those measured by CO2-triggered sampling. As a consequence, the origin of a substance (coming from patient's blood or from the dead space or the delivery system) can be determined by comparing mixed expiratory to alveolar concentrations.

A sampling of the pure inspiratory gas was not possible by means of the valve used for this study. Because of the mode of operation of the valve, the trap mounted in the inspiratory position collected a mixture of inspired and dead space gas. Therefore, the inspiratory gas had to be sampled from the inspiratory part of the circuit without using the valve. In a previous study, we demonstrated that contamination with expiratory gas did not occur at this location in the respiratory tubing (23). High inspiratory pentane and acetone concentrations are due to the fact that these substances occur in large amounts in the ambient air (24). The separation of inspiratory from dead space gas, planned for future uses of the apparatus, could provide more precise information on substance origins and may be used for assessment of pulmonary gas-mixing properties.

During the last decade, numerous trials have been undertaken to establish systematic and reliable relationships between the chemical composition of (human) exhaled air and patients' clinical conditions (8, 12-14, 24, 25). Interpretation of these studies, however, remains difficult because results are conflicting and the variation of measured substance concentrations is considerable. Analyzing mixed expired air collected in gas-sampling bags, Foster et al. (5) observed an increase in isoprene elimination in humans 19 h after exposure to ozone. The underlying mechanisms may be activation of cholesterol synthesis at the onset of repair processes after oxidative damage to fluid linings in the lungs.

Mendis et al. (14) reported an increase in isoprene elimination in patients with an acute myocardial infarction. They proposed a relationship between isoprene elimination and activation of neutrophils. In this case, end-expiratory sampling was used. The decreasing isoprene elimination found in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and pneumonia (24) is in contrast to the work cited above. In this study, mixed expiratory samples were taken from the expiratory limb in the respiratory circuit of mechanically ventilated patients. Using a modified end-expiratory sampling method, Philips et al. (21) reported increased pentane and disulfide concentrations in patients with schizophrenia. Pentane is considered a marker of in vivo lipid peroxidation (10). However, concentrations in exhaled gas reported in the literature vary from 10 (1) to 200 pmol/l (4, 11) up to 1.5 nmol/l (24) without a known relationship to patients' specific clinical conditions. Because online control of efficacy of alveolar gas sampling was not previously possible, dead space may have significantly confounded the results and may be the reason for the difficulty in clinical correlation of expired trace gas analysis.

Besides this issue, there is another problem in breath analysis that has not yet been solved. To improve clinical interpretation of the results, the question of how concentrations in the exhaled air can be converted into blood or tissue concentration needs to be addressed. To solve this problem, investigations of substance concentrations in blood and exhaled air must be undertaken, preferably in the controllable setting of an animal model.

In conclusion, the CO2-triggered valve enables reliable sampling of alveolar gas in mechanically ventilated patients. A distinction of those substances generated from within the patient from those coming out of the delivery system is possible by comparing mixed expired to alveolar substance concentrations. By use of the CO2-controlled enrichment technique, accuracy of breath analysis is enhanced, and substances occurring in very low concentrations are made accessible to chemical analysis.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. H. Pahl for valuable advice during the preparation of this manuscript and T. Berger for excellent technical assistance.


    FOOTNOTES

Presented in part at the Annual Meeting of German Anesthesiologists (DAK 97), Hamburg, Germany, April 25, 1997.

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. K. Schubert, Dept. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Univ. Hospital of Rostock, Schillingallee 35, D-18055 Rostock, Germany (E-mail: jochen.schubert{at}medizin.uni-rostock.de).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 20 April 1999; accepted in final form 28 August 2000.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1.   Cailleux, A, and Allain P. Is pentane a normal constituent of human breath? Free Radic Res Commun 18: 323-327, 1993[Web of Science][Medline].

2.   Eger, EI II. The pharmacology of isoflurane. Br J Anaesth 56: 71-99, 1984.

3.   Eger, EI II, and Bahlman SH. Is the end-tidal anesthetic partial pressure an accurate measure of the arterial anesthetic partial pressure? Anesthesiology 35: 301-303, 1971[Web of Science][Medline].

4.   Euler, DE, Davé SJ, and Guo H. Effect of smoking on pentane excretion in alveolar breath. Clin Chem 42: 303-308, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

5.   Foster, MW, Jiang L, Stetkiewicz PT, and Risby TH. Breath isoprene: temporal changes in respiratory output after exposure to ozone. J Appl Physiol 80: 706-710, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

6.   Frankel, EN. Volatile lipid oxidation products. Prog Lipid Res 22: 1-33, 1982.

7.   Habib, MP, Dickerson F, and Mooradian AD. Ethane production rate in vivo is reduced with dietary restriction. J Appl Physiol 68: 2588-2590, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].

8.   Heusler, H. Quantitative analysis of common anaesthetic agents. J Chromatogr A 340: 273-319, 1985.

9.   Kazui, M, Andreoni KA, Norris EJ, Klein AS, Burdick JF, Beattie C, Sehnert SS, Bell WR, Bulkley GB, and Risby TH. Breath ethane a specific indicator of free-radical-mediated lipid peroxidation following reperfusion of the ischemic liver. Free Radic Biol Med 13: 509-515, 1992[Web of Science][Medline].

10.   Kneepkens, CMF, Ferreira C, Lepage C, and Roy CC. The hydrocarbon breath test in the study of lipid peroxidation: principles and practice. Clin Invest Med 15: 163-186, 1992[Web of Science][Medline].

11.   Kohlmüller, D, and Kochen W. Is n-pentane really an index of lipid peroxidation in humans and animals? A methodological reevaluation. Anal Biochem 210: 268-276, 1993[Web of Science][Medline].

12.   Kokoszka, J, Nelson RL, Swedler WI, Skosey J, and Abcarian H. Determination of inflammatory bowel disease activity by breath pentane analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 36: 597-601, 1993[Web of Science][Medline].

13.   Letteron, P, Duchatelle V, Berson A, Fromenty B, Fisch C, and Degott C. Increased ethane exhalation, an in vivo index of lipid peroxidation, in alcohol-abusers. Gut 34: 409-414, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

14.   Mendis, S, Sobotka PA, and Euler DE. Expired hydrocarbons in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Free Radic Res 23: 117-122, 1995[Web of Science][Medline].

15.   Miekisch, W, Schubert JK, Müller WPE, and Geiger K. Advances in Critical Care Testing. Schaffhausen, Switzerland: AVL Medical Instruments, 1999, p. 202-211.

16.   Morita, S, Snider MT, and Inada Y. Increased n-pentane excretion in humans: a consequence of pulmonary oxygen exposure. Anesthesiology 64: 730-733, 1986[Web of Science][Medline].

17.   Ondrula, D, Nelson RL, Andrianopoulos G, Schwartz D, Abcarian H, Birnbaum A, and Skosey J. Quantitative determination of pentane in exhaled air correlates with colonic inflammation in the rat colitis model. Dis Colon Rectum 36: 457-462, 1993[Web of Science][Medline].

18.   Phillips, M. Method for the collection and assay of volatile organic compounds in breath. Anal Biochem 247: 272-278, 1997[Web of Science][Medline].

19.   Phillips, M, and Greenberg J. Ion-trap detection of volatile organic compounds in alveolar breath. Clin Chem 38: 60-65, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

20.   Phillips, M, and Greenberg J. Method for the collection and analysis of volatile compounds in the breath. J Chromatogr A 564: 242-249, 1991.

21.   Phillips, M, Saba M, and Greenberg J. Increased pentane and carbon disulfide in the breath of patients with schizophrenia. Clin Pathol 46: 861-884, 1994.

22.   Rektorik, J. Sample Introduction in Capillary Gas Chromatography. Heidelberg, Germany: Alfred Huethig, 1985, p. 217-233.

23.   Schubert, JK, Esteban-Loos I, Geiger K, and Guttmann J. In-vivo evaluation of a new method for chemical analysis of volatile components in the respiratory gas of mechanically ventilated patients. Technol Health Care 7: 29-37, 1999[Medline].

24.   Schubert, JK, Müller WPE, Benzing A, and Geiger K. Application of a new method for analysis of exhaled gas in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 24: 415-421, 1998[Web of Science][Medline].

25.   Sobotka, PA, Brottman MD, Weitz Z, Birnbaum AJ, Skosey JL, and Zarling EJ. Elevated breath pentane in heart failure reduced by free radical scavenger. Free Radic Biol Med 14: 643-647, 1993[Web of Science][Medline].

26.   Stone, BG, Besse TJ, Duane WC, Evans CD, and DeMaster EG. Effect of regulating cholesterol biosynthesis on breath isoprene excretion in men. Lipids 28: 705-778, 1993[Web of Science][Medline].

27.   Trinh, VD, and Cong-Khanh H. Graphitized carbon black in quartz tubes for the sampling of indoor air nicotine and analysis by microwave thermal desorption-capillary gas chromatography. J Chromatogr Sci 29: 179-183, 1991[Web of Science][Medline].

28.   Van Gossum, A, and Decuyper J. Breath alkanes as an index of lipid peroxidation. Eur Respir J 2: 787-791, 1989[Abstract].


J APPL PHYSIOL 90(2):486-492
8750-7587/01 $5.00 Copyright © 2001 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M. Grossherr, A. Hengstenberg, T. Meier, L. Dibbelt, B. W. Igl, A. Ziegler, P. Schmucker, and H. Gehring
Propofol concentration in exhaled air and arterial plasma in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing cardiac surgery
Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2009; 102(5): 608 - 613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
K. A. Cope, M. T. Watson, W. M. Foster, S. S. Sehnert, and T. H. Risby
Effects of ventilation on the collection of exhaled breath in humans
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2004; 96(4): 1371 - 1379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
G. von Basum, H. Dahnke, D. Halmer, P. Hering, and M. Murtz
Online recording of ethane traces in human breath via infrared laser spectroscopy
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2003; 95(6): 2583 - 2590.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (20)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schubert, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Guttmann, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schubert, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Guttmann, J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online