Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 89: 2373-2381, 2000;
8750-7587/00 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Okazawa, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lambert, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Okazawa, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lambert, R. K.
Vol. 89, Issue 6, 2373-2381, December 2000

Compliance of peripheral airways deduced from morphometry

Mitsushi Okazawa1, Peter D. Paré2, and Rodney K. Lambert3

1 Department of Respirology and Allergology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan 470-1192; 2 UBC Pulmonary Research Laboratory, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada V6Z 1Y6; and 3 Institute of Fundamental Sciences-Physics, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand 5331


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

Insights into airway mechanics were sought by applying morphometric techniques to rabbit lungs fixed at several lung recoil pressures. Rabbits were treated with either nebulized carbachol followed by iv administration of carbachol or with saline solution (sham). The lungs were held at one of six values of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP; 10, 7, 4, 2, 0, and -4 cmH2O) while the animal was killed and formalin was circulated through the lungs. The lungs were removed and left in a bath of formalin for 24 h. Standard airway morphometric measurements were made on membranous bronchiole slices taken from representative blocks of tissue. Reductions in PEEP produced the expected reductions in lumen area in the carbachol-treated airways but not in the sham-treated airways for PEEP > 2 cmH2O. Sham-treated airways remained more open than expected until they collapsed into an oval shape at PEEPs between 4 and 2 cmH2O. The carbachol-treated airways exhibited this behavior at PEEP = -4 cmH2O. The smallest airways, which had relatively thicker walls, collapsed less than larger airways. We postulate that this behavior implies that peribronchial stress is greater than lumen pressure on collapse into the oval shape. Resistance to buckling increases with the thickness-to-radius ratio of the airway wall, which explains why the smallest airways are the most open. The development of epithelial folds appeared to follow the theoretical prediction of a previous study (Lambert RK, Codd SL, Alley MR, and Pack RJ. J Appl Physiol 77: 1206-1216, 1994).

rabbit; airway mechanics; carbachol; elastic buckling


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

THE THEORETICAL UNDERSTANDING of the lung flow-volume curve, developed over the past 30 years, as well as the more recent models of the dose-response relationship of airway resistance in response to airway smooth muscle agonists (2, 3, 5, 8, 11-15, 17, 21, 25), is crucially dependent on knowledge of airway geometry and the airway area-pressure relationship [lumen area (Ai) vs. transmural pressure (Ptm)]. The human airway Ai-Ptm curves that have been used in the modeling were derived by extrapolating sparse data on large central airways to small peripheral airways that had no data. Dog data (of which there are more) have also been used (3). This has led to an element of uncertainty concerning the validity of the models, despite the fact that they exhibit many of the features observed in various lung function tests. We sought to reduce the uncertainty about the mechanics of peripheral airways, not by studying single airways but by using morphometric techniques to obtain area data at a number of lung fixation pressures. Average values from many airways of similar size were derived for the parameters of interest at each lung recoil pressure (PL). This approach has three main advantages over the study of single airways. First, the difficult experimental work lies in performing the morphometry well instead of coping with the technical difficulties associated with the mechanical parameters of tiny airways; second, structural data on the airway wall are obtained at the same time; and, third, the pattern of airway narrowing can be compared in the presence of relaxed and contracted airway smooth muscle. These latter parameters allow a deeper understanding of the airway structure-function relationship. For instance, we can explore how airway narrowing is related to mucosal folding and parenchymal interdependence. Because we obtained data at negative transpulmonary pressures, we had the opportunity to observe airway closure and to elucidate the mechanics of this phenomenon.

Our data show that, as in dogs (18), the smallest airways are relatively more open than larger airways, which is contrary to at least one human model of airway mechanics (14). Airway closure appears to occur through airway flattening (similar to the collapse of latex drainage tubing under suction), independent of whether smooth muscle is activated. Airways in which muscle is activated close at smaller lung volumes than those in which muscle is not activated; thus airway smooth muscle contraction protects the airway against closure. We hypothesize that the reason for this is that the elastic collapse of an airway into a flattened shape is governed by the thickness of the wall, relative to the luminal diameter. The shortening of the airway smooth muscle has the effect of both decreasing luminal diameter and increasing the effective wall thickness, thus stiffening the airway.


    METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

Animal preparation. Sixty mature New Zealand White rabbits were anesthetized using urethane (1,000 mg/kg iv) and alpha -chloralose (100 mg/kg iv). The rabbits were then tracheostomized and artificially ventilated with 100% oxygen at 40 breaths/min and tidal volume of 7 ml/kg. The vagi were sectioned bilaterally in the neck. A catheter was inserted into the femoral vein for drug and fluid administration. The chest was opened wide by splitting the sternum. Tracheal pressure was measured through the side port of the tracheal tube by using a piezoresistive transducer (Fujikura FPM-02PG, Tokyo, Japan) and was compared with atmospheric pressure to obtain transpulmonary pressure (PL). Airflow was measured using a pneumotachometer (model 00, Fleisch) and a differential pressure transducer (Validyne MP45) (±5 cmH2O). All pressure and flow tracings were displayed continuously on a monitor and were recorded, as necessary, by a digital data acquisition and recording system (Raytech, Vancouver, BC, Canada). The 60 rabbits were divided into control (Con; n = 30) and carbachol-treated (Carb; n = 30) groups. Each group was further divided into six subgroups according to the peak end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) value: -4, 0, 2, 4, 7, or 10 cmH2O. Thus there were five rabbits in each subgroup.

Protocol. Twenty minutes were allowed for physiological stabilization after instrumentation. The lungs were then degassed by occluding the tracheal tube and allowing complete absorption of oxygen by the pulmonary circulation. Subsequently, a quasistatic pressure-volume curve was obtained at PL between -15 and +25 cmH2O. This procedure was repeated twice at 10-min intervals. The animals were then ventilated using the same parameters as before, at the chosen value of PEEP for 10 min. Because it was impossible to ventilate the animals using a negative PEEP, the animals in the -4 cmH2O group were ventilated at +4 cmH2O PEEP. End-expiratory pressure was then set to -4 cmH2O before high-frequency oscillation. At each PEEP, the lungs were oscillated with a small tidal volume and high frequency (~0.3 ml and 6 Hz, respectively), while maintaining the chosen PEEP, to measure pulmonary resistance (Raw). At a PEEP of -4 cmH2O, it was not possible to obtain reliable Raw measurements. The animals were then ventilated at the same PEEP for a further 10 min (except for the -4 cmH2O animals, which were treated as described above). After injecting heparin (2,000 U) through the iv catheter, either air alone (Con group) or carbachol plus air (256 mg/ml; Carb group) was delivered for 1 min using a hand nebulizer (model 646, DeVillbis) with small tidal volumes, a PL excursion of 5 cmH2O, and a frequency of ~40 pulses/min. For the groups of animals that were ventilated with PEEP >=  4 cmH2O, the same PEEP was used during nebulization. For the groups of animals that were studied with PEEP <=  2 cmH2O, 4 cmH2O was used during aerosol delivery, and the PEEP was then decreased to the chosen value after nebulization. After measuring Raw again, the lung was ventilated with normal tidal volume and either 1 ml of saline (Con group) or 1 ml of 10-1 mg/ml of carbachol (Carb group) was injected through the femoral vein. Approximately 2 min after the injection, Raw was measured for a third time, and the pulmonary artery and aorta were snared to kill the animal. The pulmonary artery and left ventricle were cannulated, and 10% buffered formalin was infused into the pulmonary artery at a driving pressure of ~15 cmH2O. The fixative was drained from the left ventricle for 40 min, keeping the lung inflated at the chosen PEEP. After ligating the tracheal opening, the lung and heart were removed en bloc. The heart and surrounding connective tissue were carefully dissected from the lung and trachea. The lung gas volume was measured by subtracting lung tissue volume (lung weight/tissue density, with 1.06 g/ml used for tissue density) from lung volume determined by water displacement. The lung was further fixed in the 10% buffered formalin for 24 h. Lung volume was calculated as a fraction of total lung capacity based on the results of the initial pressure-volume experiment.

Of the five lungs available at each PL, three were randomly chosen for morphometric study. Four transverse slices were made through the lungs. Two tissue blocks were taken from each slice, and one 5-µm section was obtained from each block and stained using Masson's trichrome in preparation for microscopic observation and morphometric analysis.

Morphometric study. Each slide from the selected lungs was examined in a systematic manner. Starting from the upper left-hand corner of the slide, the whole slide was scanned, and each airway was evaluated to determine whether it was cut in cross section and fulfilled our inclusion criteria. At PL > 2 cmH2O, airways were rejected if their short-to-long luminal diameter ratio was <0.6. At the three lowest values of PL, obliquely cut airways were separated subjectively from airways flattening into an oval shape, based on the relative thickness of the epithelial regions at the ends of the long and short diameters. Flattening airways showed constant epithelial thickness, whereas the epithelium was thicker at the ends of the long diameter in obliquely sectioned airways. Every third eligible, cross-sectioned membranous airway was selected for measurement, until the total number of selected airways reached eight for each slide. Measurements were performed using a Nikon microscope equipped with a camera lucida attachment and a digitizing tablet coupled to an IBM-compatible computer. The measurements are illustrated in Fig. 1. They are as follows: 1) airway basement membrane perimeter (Pbm), the "gold standard" of airway size, and the total area enclosed by the basement membrane (Abm); 2) airway internal perimeter (Pi) and Ai, where Pi is the perimeter of the luminal border and Ai is the area enclosed by Pi; 3) smooth muscle outer perimeter (Pmo) and enclosed area (Amo), as well as the area of the wall occupied by smooth muscle (WAm); 4) perimeter of adventitial border (Po) and the total area enclosed by this border (Ao); and 5) the number of epithelial membrane folds (N). In cases in which the airway was contiguous to an adjacent vessel, a line was drawn, by hand, between the two structures to estimate Po. Airways with more than one-third of Po contiguous to an adjacent vessel were omitted from the analysis. From these measurements, we calculated the subdivisions of wall area [outer wall area (WAo = Ao - Amo); inner wall area (WAi = Amo - Ai)]. We also calculated area for a fully dilated airway in which the basement membrane is a circle. All such measurements are referred to by adding an asterisk. For example, Abm* is the area enclosed by the basement membrane when circular. Measurements conformed to the recommendations of Bai et al. (1). A selection of the results of these measurements and calculations are reported herein.


View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Schematic cross section of airway showing morphometric measurements. r, Radius; P, perimeter; A, area; WA, wall area. Subscripts: o, adventitial border; mo, outer smooth muscle; bm, basement membrane; i, lumen.

Data analysis. The data from each group of animals were pooled at each PL for each treatment to obtain mean values for Con and Carb airways. The airways were also subdivided into bins based on Pbm at each PL. After some preliminary analysis of airway number and the distribution of airway sizes, we decided to use the bins shown in Table 1. Means and standard errors of relevant measures of airway size and deformation were calculated for the pooled data and by bin. Measured and derived quantities were normalized on the basement membrane length, except Ai, which was normalized on the maximal lumen area (Ai* = Pi2/4pi , where Pi is the internal perimeter of the lumen). Lung volumes (V) were normalized on the volume at PL = 25 cmH2O, the greatest inflation pressure that we used. The number of airways examined at each PL is shown in Table 2.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Pbm ranges used in determining bins


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.   No. of airways studied at each PL


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

There were no significant differences in the pressure-volume relationships between Con and Carb groups, except at PL = 0 and 7 cmH2O (t-test, P < 0.05). Raw data are summarized in Fig. 2. Because there were no significant changes in Raw in the Con group caused by the sham treatment, these data are not shown. There were no significant differences in baseline Raw between Con and Carb groups at each PL. In the Carb group, elevation of Raw occurred in all animals after the administration of nebulized carbachol. A further elevation occurred after iv administration of carbachol. There were significant differences between the means for both treatments at PL = 0, 2, and 4 cmH2O (paired t-test, P < 0.05). At 7 cmH2O, only the elevation caused by iv carbachol was statistically significant, whereas, at 10 cmH2O, only the nebulized treatment produced a statistically significant increase in Raw. Thus the delivery of nebulized carbachol at a concentration of 256 mg/ml did not achieve maximal muscle activation. Examination of the morphometric data showed that the progressive increase in Raw with decreasing PL (Fig. 2) is caused, in part, by a progression of muscle shortening from central to peripheral airways as PL is reduced.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Airway resistance (Raw) as a function of lung recoil pressure (PL) for carbachol-treated airways. Raw(neb), Raw after nebulized administration of carbachol. Raw(iv), Raw after nebulized and iv administration of carbachol. * Significant elevation of Raw(neb) (P < 0.05, t-test). dagger  Significant elevation of Raw(iv) (P < 0.05). Error bars = SD.

Both Con and Carb airways (365 and 549 airways, respectively) were selected for analysis. The frequency distribution of Pbm was not different (Kolmogorov-Smirnoff test, P < 0.001) between Con and Carb groups.

Figure 3 shows the mean, normalized Ai-PL curves (i.e., Ai/Ai* vs. PL) for the pooled data for both the Con and the Carb cases. At PL ranging from 0 to 7 cmH2O, the lumens of the Carb airways were smaller than the lumens of the Con airways. Also, the steepest decrease in lumen area occurred at lower values of PL in the Con airways than in the Carb airways. These results are not surprising. The surprising result is that, at PL = -4 cmH2O, the two curves crossed, and the Carb airways were significantly more open than the Con airways (Welch test, P < 0.01). This result was true for all airway sizes, although not all differences achieved statistical significance (Fig. 4). Another surprising result that was true across all airway sizes was that the Con airways were more open at PL = 7 cmH2O than at 10 cmH2O (Figs. 3 and 4), except for the small airways for which there were insufficient data at PL = 7 and 10 cmH2O. It is also worth noting that, for all sizes of Carb airways, there were no changes in lumen area between PL = 0 and 2 cmH2O. Thus there should have been no change in Raw in this pressure range. It can be seen in Fig. 2 that this was the case.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Pooled normalized Ai (Ai/Ai*) vs. PL data. , Control (Con) data; , carbachol (Carb)-treated lung data.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Ai/Ai* vs. PL, binned data, grouped by airway size.  Con data; , Carb data. Error bars = SE. Airway categories are defined in Table 1.

A finding that does depend on airway size is apparent in Fig. 4. The value of Ai/Ai* at PL = 0 cmH2O is greater for small airways than for larger airways. This is true for both Con and Carb airways.

Our observation that the smallest airways are relatively more open than larger airways [which has also been reported for dogs (18)] can be elucidated from further examination of the histological sections. Fig. 5 shows representative photomicrographs of cross-sectioned airways. In the Con group (Fig. 5, D-F), airways were predominantly round at PL >=  4 cmH2O and were narrowed and flattened at smaller PL values. In the Carb group (Fig. 5, A-C), airways were round and unfolded at PL = 10 cmH2O (not shown) and circularly narrowed with many folds at 4 cmH2O. At PL = 0 cmH2O, Carb airways tended to remain rounded, with many folds. At PL = -4 cmH2O, these airways tended to be no longer circular but were somewhat flattened, although the flattening was to a lesser extent than in Con airways. Thus it appears that there were two different modes of reduction of lumen area as PL was reduced. The Con airways flattened and then developed many epithelial folds, whereas the Carb airways developed many folds then flattened.


View larger version (165K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Representative micrographs of airways from 2 groups at PL = -4, 0, and 4. A-C: Carb airways at PL = 4, 0, and -4 cmH2O, respectively. D-F: Con airways at PL = 4, 0, and -4 cmH2O, respectively.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

We believe that this is the first reported observation of airway collapse and closure by flattening. It is a puzzling observation as the conceptual model of our experiment was that of a uniformly deflating lung, with snapshots of its morphology taken at six different recoil pressures. An initially circular airway should have stayed circular. We propose that our observations can be understood by using the theory of elastic buckling that was used to explain the mechanics of the folding of the epithelial membrane. When the pressure on the outside of a circular elastic tube is greater than the pressure inside the tube by a critical amount, the tube undergoes elastic buckling into an oval shape that becomes progressively flatter as the Ptm difference is increased. In the case of the epithelial membrane, this flattening is not observed because the membrane is subject to the geometrical constraint of not being able to penetrate the airway smooth muscle layer. It must, therefore, develop folds instead of flattening. We propose that the total airway wall is not so constrained and is thus able to collapse into an oval shape.

An intraparenchymal airway becomes subjected to a collapsing stress through the interdependence mechanism. The basis for this has been developed in several modeling studies in which the airway is thought of as a tube embedded in the foamlike parenchyma (7, 11-13, 15, 16). It may be helpful to think of the airway as a circular tube that must be inserted into a circular hole in the parenchyma. When the diameter of the unfilled parenchymal hole, in which the tube is embedded, is the same size as the outer diameter of the tube, the stress on the outside of the tube is the same as the stress on the pleural surface (16). If the tube is bigger than the (unfilled) hole, the local peribronchial stress will tend to compress the airway, whereas, if the hole is larger than the airway (as we expected would happen when the airway smooth muscle shortened), the local stress will tend to keep the airway open. This is usually referred to as the "interdependence effect." Experiments that examined the relationship between airway and parenchymal hole sizes in excised dog lungs showed that, for the values of PL that occur around functional residual capacity and for larger airways, the peribronchial stress is no more than ~1 cmH2O different from pleural pressure (7, 19). We believe that our data show that collapsing pressure must occur in the case of our small rabbit airways. To demonstrate this, we must determine whether the airway changes size with PL in the same way as the parenchyma. For a uniformly deflating lung, such as we assume to have in the present study, linear dimensions scale on the cube root of lung volume and areas scale on the two-thirds power of lung volume. Hence, to aid comparison between airway cross-sectional area and the area of a hole in the parenchyma, in which the airway would be a snug fit at total lung capacity, we have plotted normalized airway total cross-sectional area (Ao/Ao*) and volume (V/V*)2/3 against PL (Fig. 6). It is apparent that Ao/Ao* for the smaller Con airways (small and 1-mm bins) does not change in the same way with PL as would an unfilled hole in the parenchyma of a uniformly deflating lung. The hole is much smaller than the airway at PL < 7 cmH2O (the larger airways deviate from uniform deflation at PL < 2 cmH2O). Thus, for the small and 1-mm Con airways at these PLs, the parenchyma adjacent to an airway must be compressed relative to the parenchyma distant from the airway (Fig. 5D). From this observation, it follows that instead of the peribronchial stress being equal to pleural pressure, it must be closer to or even exceed lumen pressure. That is, parenchymal interdependence is causing the airway to compress rather than remain open. When this compression is sufficiently great, the airway wall buckles elastically, and the airway starts to flatten (Fig. 7). The mechanics of this are similar to those for the initial buckling of the epithelial membrane (9), but, instead of the epithelial membrane, it is the entire thickness of the airway wall that is involved in the buckling. This buckling has been described by Hill and colleagues (6), who showed that it is governed by the mechanical and geometrical properties of not only the wall but also the parenchyma. They predicted that it could occur at a PL as low as 1 cmH2O. Our results, which indicate a buckling pressure between 2 and 4 cmH2O, are in accord with this prediction. The greater value that we observed could indicate that the stiffness of the folding membrane is greater than assumed by Hill and colleagues. Once buckling has commenced, the peribronchial stress probably becomes nonuniform around the perimeter of the airway, with greater stress on the ends of the long diameter than on the ends of the short diameter. In the APPENDIX, we show that the peribronchial stress around a small Con airway at PL = 2 cmH2O is ~2.4 cm H2O, which results in a collapsing Ptm difference of 0.4 cmH2O. The same calculation for PL = 0 cmH2O yields a collapsing Ptm difference of 6 cmH2O. Further support for our flattening argument is given in Table 3, in which we present the mean values for the ratio of the short-to-long diameters of the airways at each PL < 4 cmH2O (at PL >=  4 cmH2O, we excluded airways for which this value was <0.6, as explained above.) It is apparent from the data in Table 3 that the airways flatten (i.e, the ratio decreases) with decreasing PL and that this flattening is greater for the Con airways than for the Carb airways. For small and 1-mm Con airways at PL <=  2 cmH2O, it appears that the epithelial membrane becomes more folded (Figs. 5 and 8) as the long diameter of the flattened cross section becomes shorter under the influence of the compressive stress on the ends of the long diameter of the airway.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Comparison of (normalized) total airway cross-sectional area (Ao) with the (normalized) area of a hole in the parenchyma [which scales on the 2/3 power of lung volume (V/V*)2/3] as a function of PL. A: Con airways. B: Carb airways.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Progressive collapse of a Con airway with decreasing PL. Open area, airway lumen; shaded area, submucosa; dashed circle, circular hole in parenchyma in uniformly deflating lung at a given PL.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3.   Ratio of short-to-long lumen diameters for all airways at given lung recoil pressures



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Number of folds vs. PL, binned data, grouped by airway size. , Con data; , Carb data. Error bars = SE. Airway categories are defined in Table 1.

The question still remains as to why the very smallest airways collapse the least. Elastic buckling theory shows that a tube's intrinsic resistance to buckling increases with the cube of the thickness-to-radius ratio. We have no direct measure of this. However, because WAt/Abm* is approximately twice the thickness-to-radius ratio of the fully distended airway, it can be seen in Fig. 9 that the smaller airways had relatively thicker walls, and this could explain their resistance to elastic buckling.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Normalized total wall area (WA/Abm*) at three values of PL in Con (A) and Carb (B) airways. Plotted values are ~2× the thickness-to-radius ratio of a fully dilated airway. Error bars = SE. Airway categories are defined in Table 1.

The data in Fig. 8 show that, for all airway sizes, the Carb airways had more epithelial folds than Con airways at positive PL. Close to PL = 0 cmH2O, the number of folds is approximately the same for both treatments. The data also show that the number of folds increases with airway size. According to the study by Lambert and colleagues (10), the number of folds is determined not by airway size but by the normalized thickness of the region between the subepithelial reticular layer and the muscle layer (called the "submucosa" by those authors, referred to as "gap" in the present study and the area of the wall cross-section that it occupies as WAg). Their analysis shows an inverse relationship between gap thickness and fold number. Thus the data in Fig. 8 indicate that the normalized gap thickness should be greater as the size of the airway decreases. We calculated this thickness (WAg/Abm*) and present the results in Fig. 10. These data are in qualitative agreement with the predictions (10). When we plotted our data in the same three-dimensional manner as Lambert et al. did with their sheep data, we obtained a graph that looked very similar to their Fig. 3B (10). That study also predicted the dependence of fold number on lumen area. Our results for the pooled data (pooled data are used to reduce the noise) are shown in Fig. 11. Two things are apparent from this figure. First, the number of folds increases as the lumen area decreases. This is in accord with the analysis of Lambert and colleagues (10) and is contrary to that of Wiggs et al. (24) and Seow et al. (20). Comparison of our Fig. 11 with Fig. 2 in Ref. 10 suggests a value of ~0.07 for WAg/Abm*, which is in agreement with our rabbit data (Fig. 10). Second, the relationship between fold number and lumen area appears to be the same for Con and Carb airways, despite the different sequences of collapse and manner of loading of the membrane.


View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Normalized thickness of the gap (see text) (WAg/Abm*) at all PL values for Con (A) and Carb (B) airways. Error bars = SE. Airway categories are defined in Table 1.



View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11.   Number of epithelial folds as a function of Ai/Ai* for pooled data. , Con data; , Carb data.

There are two other studies in which theories of epithelial membrane folding have been developed (20, 24). Because the values for WAg/Abm* used in those studies are greatly in excess of those observed experimentally, both in this study and others (10, 18), the biological relevance of those theories is called into question.

Figures 3 and 11 show pooled data. These graphs more clearly show the behavior of the airways than the binned data. However, they must be treated with caution, as we did not sample equally in all bin sizes. Our data tended to be clustered in the two bins of smaller airway size because there were many more of these airways to sample. Thus the pooled data are biased toward small airways. Our conclusions are not crucially dependent on the pooled data.

Because only small volume oscillations were applied immediately before the fixation process, it is unlikely that the Carb airway geometry reported in this study conforms to what would exist in vivo when tidal pressure swings are superimposed on the bronchoconstricting stimulus. There is increasing evidence that tidal stretching of airway smooth muscle is an important modulator of airway tone and may be the most important safety factor preventing excessive airway narrowing (4, 22). Although tidal breathing would probably attenuate the degree of muscle shortening and airway narrowing we observed, it is unlikely that it would alter the basic conclusions of this study. The qualitative differences in the behavior of the relaxed and constricted airway at low distending pressures would still be operating.

In summary, our data show that, in a deflating lung, unchallenged (Con) airways flatten with very little mucosal folding and then develop mucosal folds with further lung deflation. On the other hand, challenged (Carb) airways develop many folds as the lung deflates and flatten only at collapsing Ptm values. The observed pattern of folding is in accord with the predictions of the model analysis of Lambert and colleagues (10). Whereas Carb airways have less lumen area than Con airways at distending Ptms, they are more open at collapsing pressures. Our results show that "parenchymal interdependence" imposes a collapsing stress on Con airways at positive PL, which raises the question of whether parenchymal interdependence provides significant support for bronchoconstricted airways at low positive PL. If it is not significant, then folding of the epithelial basement membrane may provide the only mechanical resistance to smooth muscle shortening under these circumstances.


    APPENDIX
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

It is possible to estimate the peribronchial deformation of the parenchyma and thus to estimate the peribronchial stress (Px). The normalized radius of an airway is approximately equal to the smooth muscle outer perimeter divided by the basement membrane perimeter (Pmo/Pbm). The normalized radius of a hole in the parenchyma is approximately equal to the cube root of the normalized volume [(V/V*)1/3]. Thus the strain, varepsilon , is given by the following equation
ϵ=<FR><NU>P<SUB>mo</SUB><IT>/P</IT><SUB>bm</SUB><IT>−</IT>(V<IT>/</IT>V<IT>*</IT>)<SUP><IT>1/3</IT></SUP></NU><DE>(V<IT>/</IT>V<IT>*</IT>)<SUP><IT>1/3</IT></SUP></DE></FR><IT>=</IT><FR><NU><IT>P</IT><SUB>mo</SUB><IT>/P</IT><SUB>bm</SUB></NU><DE>(V<IT>/</IT>V<IT>*</IT>)<SUP><IT>1/3</IT></SUP></DE></FR><IT>−1</IT>
For a small Con airway at PL = 2 cmH2O, varepsilon  has a value of 0.6. Using the expression for the shear modulus of rabbit parenchyma deduced by Stamenovic and Yager (23), µ = (0.5 × PL) + 3 cmH2O, to calculate the peribronchial stress change from the uniformly inflated state (Delta Px), yields Delta Px = 2.4 cmH2O. The same calculation for PL = 0 results in Delta Px = 6 cmH2O. Because we are using pleural pressure (Ppl) as reference, the peribronchial stress for an airway that deflates uniformly with the parenchyma is Px = 0 and airway lumen pressure is PL. Thus, for a small circular Con airway at PL = 2 cmH2O, the pressure on the outside is 2.4 cmH2O and inside is 2 cmH2O, resulting in a collapsing Ptm of 0.4 cmH2O. This calculation is less than rigorous because it uses linear elasticity theory, which is probably not accurate for such large deformations. However, the calculation was not made with quantitative accuracy in mind but, rather, to show the plausibility of our hypothesis that the parenchyma near a Con airway can be compressed enough to provide a collapsing Ptm.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported in part by the Medical Research Council of Canada and the New Zealand Lotteries Health Committee. During the course of this investigation, M. Okazawa was a Canadian Lung Association Scholar.


    FOOTNOTES

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. K. Lambert, Institute of Fundamental Sciences-Physics, Massey Univ., Palmerston North, New Zealand 5331 (E-mail: R.Lambert{at}massey.ac.nz).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 1 September 1999; accepted in final form 23 June 2000.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

1.   Bai, A, Eidelman DH, Hogg JC, James AL, Lambert RK, Ludwig MS, Martin J, McDonald DM, Mitzner WA, Okazawa M, Pack RJ, Paré PD, Schellenberg RR, Tiddens HAWM, Wagner EM, and Yager D. Proposed nomenclature for quantifying subdivisions of the bronchial wall. J Appl Physiol 77: 1011-1014, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

2.   Dawson, SV, and Elliott EA. Wave-speed limitation on expiratory flow: a unifying concept. J Appl Physiol 43: 498-515, 1977[Abstract/Free Full Text].

3.   Elad, D, Kamm RD, and Shapiro AH. Mathematical simulation of forced expiration. J Appl Physiol 65: 14-25, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].

4.  Fredberg JJ, Inouye D, Miller B, Nathan M, Jafari S, Raboudi SH, Butler JP, and Shore SA. Airway smooth muscle, tidal stretches, and dynamically determined contractile states. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 156: 1997.

5.   Fry, DL. Theoretical considerations of the bronchial pressure-flow-volume relationships with particular reference to the maximum expiratory flow-volume curve. Phys Med Biol 3: 174-194, 1958[ISI][Medline].

6.   Hill, MJ, Wilson TA, and Lambert RK. Effects of surface tension and intraluminal fluid on mechanics of small airways. J Appl Physiol 82: 233-239, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

7.   Lai-Fook, SJ, Hyatt RE, and Rodarte JR. Effect of parenchymal shear modulus and lung volume on bronchial pressure-diameter behavior. J Appl Physiol 44: 859-868, 1978[Abstract/Free Full Text].

8.   Lambert, RK. A new computational model for expiratory flow from nonhomogeneous human lungs. Trans ASME 111: 200-205, 1989.

9.   Lambert, RK. Role of bronchial basement membrane in airway collapse. J Appl Physiol 71: 666-673, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

10.   Lambert, RK, Codd SL, Alley MR, and Pack RJ. Physical determinants of bronchial mucosal folding. J Appl Physiol 77: 1206-1216, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

11.   Lambert, RK, and Paré PD. Lung parenchymal shear modulus, airway wall remodeling, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness. J Appl Physiol 83: 140-147, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

12.   Lambert, RK, Wiggs BR, Kuwano K, Hogg JC, and Paré PD. Functional significance of increased airway smooth muscle in asthma and COPD. J Appl Physiol 74: 2771-2781, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

13.   Lambert, RK, and Wilson TA. A model for the elastic properties of the lung and their effect on expiratory flow. J Appl Physiol 34: 34-48, 1973[Free Full Text].

14.   Lambert, RK, Wilson TA, Hyatt RE, and Rodarte JR. A computational model for expiratory flow. J Appl Physiol 52: 44-56, 1982[Abstract/Free Full Text].

15.   Macklem, PT. A theoretical analysis of the effect of airway smooth muscle load on airway narrowing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 153: 83-89, 1996[Abstract].

16.   Mead, J, Takishima T, and Leith D. Stress distribution in lungs; a model of pulmonary elasticity. J Appl Physiol 28: 596-608, 1970[Free Full Text].

17.  Mead J, Turner JM, Macklem PT, and Little JB. Significance of the relationship between lung recoil and maximum expiratory flow. J Appl Physiol 22: 1967.

18.   Okazawa, M, Vedal S, Verburgt L, Lambert RK, and Paré PD. Determinants of airway smooth muscle shortening in excised canine lobes. J Appl Physiol 78: 608-614, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

19.   Sasaki, H, Hoppin FG, and Takishima T. Peribronchial pressure in excised dog lungs. J Appl Physiol 45: 858-869, 1978[Abstract/Free Full Text].

20.   Seow, CY, Wang L, and Paré PD. Airway narrowing and internal structural constraints. J Appl Physiol 88: 527-533, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].

21.   Shapiro, AH. Steady flows in collapsible tubes. Trans ASME 99: 126-147, 1977.

22.   Shen, X, Gunst SJ, and Tepper RS. Effect of tidal volume and frequency on airway responsiveness in mechanically ventilated rabbits. J Appl Physiol 83: 1202-1208, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

23.   Stamenovic, D, and Yager D. Elastic properties of air- and liquid-filled lung parenchyma. J Appl Physiol 65: 2565-2570, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].

24.   Wiggs, BR, Hrousma CA, Drazen JM, and Kamm RD. On the mechanism of mucosal folding in normal and asthmatic airways. J Appl Physiol 83: 1814-1821, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

25.   Wiggs, B, Moreno R, James A, Hogg J, and Paré P. A model of the mechanics of airway narrowing in asthma. In: Asthma, Its Pathology and Treatment, edited by Kalliner MA, Barnes PJ, and Persson CGA. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1991, p. 73-101.


J APPL PHYSIOL 89(6):2373-2381
8750-7587/00 $5.00 Copyright © 2000 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. J. Gunst
Does airway inflation stretch the bronchial mucosal membrane?
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2005; 99(6): 2059 - 2060.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
P. B. Noble, A. Sharma, P. K. McFawn, and H. W. Mitchell
Elastic properties of the bronchial mucosa: epithelial unfolding and stretch in response to airway inflation
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2005; 99(6): 2061 - 2066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
C. Y. Seow
Are you pulling my airway?
Eur. Respir. J., November 1, 2005; 26(5): 759 - 761.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
B. E. McParland, P. D. Pare, P. R. A. Johnson, C. L. Armour, and J. L. Black
Airway basement membrane perimeter in human airways is not a constant; potential implications for airway remodeling in asthma
J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2004; 97(2): 556 - 563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
T. Sera, H. Fujioka, H. Yokota, A. Makinouchi, R. Himeno, R. C. Schroter, and K. Tanishita
Localized compliance of small airways in excised rat lungs using microfocal X-ray computed tomography
J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2004; 96(5): 1665 - 1673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
W. Mitzner
Airway Smooth Muscle: The Appendix of the Lung
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 2004; 169(7): 787 - 790.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. M. Smiley-Jewell, M. U. Tran, A. J. Weir, Z. A. Johnson, L. S. Van Winkle, and C. G. Plopper
Three-dimensional mapping of smooth muscle in the distal conducting airways of mouse, rabbit, and monkey
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2002; 93(4): 1506 - 1514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. K. Lambert, R. Ramchandani, X. Shen, S. J. Gunst, and R. S. Tepper
Computational model of airway narrowing: mature vs. immature rabbit
J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2002; 93(2): 611 - 619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. Latourelle, B. Fabry, and J. J. Fredberg
Dynamic equilibration of airway smooth muscle contraction during physiological loading
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2002; 92(2): 771 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. K. Lambert, P. D. Pare, and M. Okazawa
Stiffness of peripheral airway folding membrane in rabbits
J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2001; 90(6): 2041 - 2047.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Okazawa, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lambert, R. K.