|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Respirology and Allergology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan 470-1192; 2 UBC Pulmonary Research Laboratory, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada V6Z 1Y6; and 3 Institute of Fundamental Sciences-Physics, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand 5331
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Insights into airway mechanics were sought by applying
morphometric techniques to rabbit lungs fixed at several lung recoil pressures. Rabbits were treated with either nebulized carbachol followed by iv administration of carbachol or with saline solution (sham). The lungs were held at one of six values of positive
end-expiratory pressure (PEEP; 10, 7, 4, 2, 0, and
4
cmH2O) while the animal was killed and formalin was
circulated through the lungs. The lungs were removed and left in a bath
of formalin for 24 h. Standard airway morphometric measurements
were made on membranous bronchiole slices taken from representative
blocks of tissue. Reductions in PEEP produced the expected reductions
in lumen area in the carbachol-treated airways but not in the
sham-treated airways for PEEP > 2 cmH2O. Sham-treated
airways remained more open than expected until they collapsed into an
oval shape at PEEPs between 4 and 2 cmH2O. The
carbachol-treated airways exhibited this behavior at PEEP =
4
cmH2O. The smallest airways, which had relatively thicker
walls, collapsed less than larger airways. We postulate that this
behavior implies that peribronchial stress is greater than lumen
pressure on collapse into the oval shape. Resistance to buckling
increases with the thickness-to-radius ratio of the airway wall, which
explains why the smallest airways are the most open. The development of
epithelial folds appeared to follow the theoretical prediction of a
previous study (Lambert RK, Codd SL, Alley MR, and Pack RJ.
J Appl Physiol 77: 1206-1216, 1994).
rabbit; airway mechanics; carbachol; elastic buckling
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
THE THEORETICAL UNDERSTANDING of the lung flow-volume curve, developed over the past 30 years, as well as the more recent models of the dose-response relationship of airway resistance in response to airway smooth muscle agonists (2, 3, 5, 8, 11-15, 17, 21, 25), is crucially dependent on knowledge of airway geometry and the airway area-pressure relationship [lumen area (Ai) vs. transmural pressure (Ptm)]. The human airway Ai-Ptm curves that have been used in the modeling were derived by extrapolating sparse data on large central airways to small peripheral airways that had no data. Dog data (of which there are more) have also been used (3). This has led to an element of uncertainty concerning the validity of the models, despite the fact that they exhibit many of the features observed in various lung function tests. We sought to reduce the uncertainty about the mechanics of peripheral airways, not by studying single airways but by using morphometric techniques to obtain area data at a number of lung fixation pressures. Average values from many airways of similar size were derived for the parameters of interest at each lung recoil pressure (PL). This approach has three main advantages over the study of single airways. First, the difficult experimental work lies in performing the morphometry well instead of coping with the technical difficulties associated with the mechanical parameters of tiny airways; second, structural data on the airway wall are obtained at the same time; and, third, the pattern of airway narrowing can be compared in the presence of relaxed and contracted airway smooth muscle. These latter parameters allow a deeper understanding of the airway structure-function relationship. For instance, we can explore how airway narrowing is related to mucosal folding and parenchymal interdependence. Because we obtained data at negative transpulmonary pressures, we had the opportunity to observe airway closure and to elucidate the mechanics of this phenomenon.
Our data show that, as in dogs (18), the smallest airways are relatively more open than larger airways, which is contrary to at least one human model of airway mechanics (14). Airway closure appears to occur through airway flattening (similar to the collapse of latex drainage tubing under suction), independent of whether smooth muscle is activated. Airways in which muscle is activated close at smaller lung volumes than those in which muscle is not activated; thus airway smooth muscle contraction protects the airway against closure. We hypothesize that the reason for this is that the elastic collapse of an airway into a flattened shape is governed by the thickness of the wall, relative to the luminal diameter. The shortening of the airway smooth muscle has the effect of both decreasing luminal diameter and increasing the effective wall thickness, thus stiffening the airway.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animal preparation.
Sixty mature New Zealand White rabbits were anesthetized using urethane
(1,000 mg/kg iv) and
-chloralose (100 mg/kg iv). The rabbits were
then tracheostomized and artificially ventilated with 100% oxygen at
40 breaths/min and tidal volume of 7 ml/kg. The vagi were sectioned
bilaterally in the neck. A catheter was inserted into the femoral vein
for drug and fluid administration. The chest was opened wide by
splitting the sternum. Tracheal pressure was measured through the side
port of the tracheal tube by using a piezoresistive transducer
(Fujikura FPM-02PG, Tokyo, Japan) and was compared with atmospheric
pressure to obtain transpulmonary pressure (PL). Airflow
was measured using a pneumotachometer (model 00, Fleisch) and a
differential pressure transducer (Validyne MP45) (±5
cmH2O). All pressure and flow tracings were displayed continuously on a monitor and were recorded, as necessary, by a digital
data acquisition and recording system (Raytech, Vancouver, BC,
Canada). The 60 rabbits were divided into control (Con;
n = 30) and carbachol-treated (Carb; n = 30) groups. Each group was further divided into six subgroups
according to the peak end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) value:
4, 0, 2, 4, 7, or 10 cmH2O. Thus there were five rabbits in each subgroup.
Protocol.
Twenty minutes were allowed for physiological stabilization after
instrumentation. The lungs were then degassed by occluding the tracheal
tube and allowing complete absorption of oxygen by the pulmonary
circulation. Subsequently, a quasistatic pressure-volume curve was
obtained at PL between
15 and +25
cmH2O. This procedure was repeated twice at 10-min
intervals. The animals were then ventilated using the same parameters
as before, at the chosen value of PEEP for 10 min. Because it was
impossible to ventilate the animals using a negative PEEP, the animals
in the
4 cmH2O group were ventilated at +4
cmH2O PEEP. End-expiratory pressure was then set to
4
cmH2O before high-frequency oscillation. At each PEEP, the
lungs were oscillated with a small tidal volume and high frequency
(~0.3 ml and 6 Hz, respectively), while maintaining the chosen PEEP,
to measure pulmonary resistance (Raw). At a PEEP of
4
cmH2O, it was not possible to obtain reliable
Raw measurements. The animals were then ventilated at the
same PEEP for a further 10 min (except for the
4 cmH2O
animals, which were treated as described above). After injecting
heparin (2,000 U) through the iv catheter, either air alone
(Con group) or carbachol plus air (256 mg/ml; Carb group) was delivered
for 1 min using a hand nebulizer (model 646, DeVillbis) with small
tidal volumes, a PL excursion of 5 cmH2O, and a
frequency of ~40 pulses/min. For the groups of animals that
were ventilated with PEEP
4 cmH2O, the same PEEP
was used during nebulization. For the groups of animals that were
studied with PEEP
2 cmH2O, 4 cmH2O was
used during aerosol delivery, and the PEEP was then decreased to the
chosen value after nebulization. After measuring Raw again,
the lung was ventilated with normal tidal volume and either 1 ml of
saline (Con group) or 1 ml of 10
1 mg/ml of carbachol
(Carb group) was injected through the femoral vein. Approximately 2 min
after the injection, Raw was measured for a third time, and
the pulmonary artery and aorta were snared to kill the animal. The
pulmonary artery and left ventricle were cannulated, and 10% buffered
formalin was infused into the pulmonary artery at a driving pressure of
~15 cmH2O. The fixative was drained from the left
ventricle for 40 min, keeping the lung inflated at the chosen PEEP.
After ligating the tracheal opening, the lung and heart were removed en
bloc. The heart and surrounding connective tissue were carefully
dissected from the lung and trachea. The lung gas volume was measured
by subtracting lung tissue volume (lung weight/tissue density, with
1.06 g/ml used for tissue density) from lung volume determined by water
displacement. The lung was further fixed in the 10% buffered formalin
for 24 h. Lung volume was calculated as a fraction of total lung
capacity based on the results of the initial pressure-volume experiment.
Morphometric study.
Each slide from the selected lungs was examined in a systematic manner.
Starting from the upper left-hand corner of the slide, the whole slide
was scanned, and each airway was evaluated to determine whether it was
cut in cross section and fulfilled our inclusion criteria. At
PL > 2 cmH2O, airways were rejected if their
short-to-long luminal diameter ratio was <0.6. At the three lowest values of PL, obliquely cut airways were separated
subjectively from airways flattening into an oval shape, based on the
relative thickness of the epithelial regions at the ends of the long
and short diameters. Flattening airways showed constant epithelial thickness, whereas the epithelium was thicker at the ends of the long
diameter in obliquely sectioned airways. Every third eligible, cross-sectioned membranous airway was selected for measurement, until
the total number of selected airways reached eight for each slide.
Measurements were performed using a Nikon microscope equipped with a
camera lucida attachment and a digitizing tablet coupled to an
IBM-compatible computer. The measurements are illustrated in Fig.
1. They are as follows: 1)
airway basement membrane perimeter (Pbm), the
"gold standard" of airway size, and the total area enclosed by the
basement membrane (Abm); 2) airway
internal perimeter (Pi) and
Ai, where Pi is the
perimeter of the luminal border and Ai is the
area enclosed by Pi; 3) smooth muscle
outer perimeter (Pmo) and enclosed area
(Amo), as well as the area of the wall occupied
by smooth muscle (WAm); 4) perimeter
of adventitial border (Po) and the total area
enclosed by this border (Ao); and 5)
the number of epithelial membrane folds (N). In cases in
which the airway was contiguous to an adjacent vessel, a line was
drawn, by hand, between the two structures to estimate
Po. Airways with more than one-third of
Po contiguous to an adjacent vessel were omitted
from the analysis. From these measurements, we calculated the
subdivisions of wall area [outer wall area
(WAo = Ao
Amo); inner wall area
(WAi = Amo
Ai)]. We also calculated area for a fully
dilated airway in which the basement membrane is a circle. All such
measurements are referred to by adding an asterisk. For example,
Abm* is the area enclosed by the basement
membrane when circular. Measurements conformed to the recommendations
of Bai et al. (1). A selection of the results of these
measurements and calculations are reported herein.
|
Data analysis.
The data from each group of animals were pooled at each PL
for each treatment to obtain mean values for Con and Carb airways. The
airways were also subdivided into bins based on
Pbm at each PL. After some
preliminary analysis of airway number and the distribution of airway
sizes, we decided to use the bins shown in Table
1. Means and standard errors of relevant
measures of airway size and deformation were calculated for the pooled
data and by bin. Measured and derived quantities were
normalized on the basement membrane length, except
Ai, which was normalized on the maximal lumen
area (Ai* = Pi2/4
, where Pi is
the internal perimeter of the lumen). Lung volumes (V) were normalized
on the volume at PL = 25 cmH2O, the greatest inflation pressure that we used. The number of airways examined at each
PL is shown in Table 2.
|
|
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There were no significant differences in the pressure-volume
relationships between Con and Carb groups, except at PL = 0 and 7 cmH2O (t-test, P < 0.05).
Raw data are summarized in Fig.
2. Because there were no significant
changes in Raw in the Con group caused by the sham
treatment, these data are not shown. There were no significant
differences in baseline Raw between Con and Carb groups at
each PL. In the Carb group, elevation of Raw
occurred in all animals after the administration of nebulized
carbachol. A further elevation occurred after iv administration of
carbachol. There were significant differences between the means for
both treatments at PL = 0, 2, and 4 cmH2O
(paired t-test, P < 0.05). At 7 cmH2O, only the elevation caused by iv carbachol was
statistically significant, whereas, at 10 cmH2O, only the
nebulized treatment produced a statistically significant increase in
Raw. Thus the delivery of nebulized carbachol at a
concentration of 256 mg/ml did not achieve maximal muscle activation.
Examination of the morphometric data showed that the progressive
increase in Raw with decreasing PL (Fig. 2) is
caused, in part, by a progression of muscle shortening from central to
peripheral airways as PL is reduced.
|
Both Con and Carb airways (365 and 549 airways, respectively) were selected for analysis. The frequency distribution of Pbm was not different (Kolmogorov-Smirnoff test, P < 0.001) between Con and Carb groups.
Figure 3 shows the mean, normalized
Ai-PL curves (i.e.,
Ai/Ai* vs.
PL) for the pooled data for both the Con and the Carb
cases. At PL ranging from 0 to 7 cmH2O, the
lumens of the Carb airways were smaller than the lumens of the Con
airways. Also, the steepest decrease in lumen area occurred at lower
values of PL in the Con airways than in the Carb airways.
These results are not surprising. The surprising result is that, at
PL =
4 cmH2O, the two curves crossed, and the
Carb airways were significantly more open than the Con airways (Welch
test, P < 0.01). This result was true for all airway
sizes, although not all differences achieved statistical significance
(Fig. 4). Another surprising result that
was true across all airway sizes was that the Con airways were more
open at PL = 7 cmH2O than at 10 cmH2O (Figs. 3 and 4), except for the small airways for
which there were insufficient data at PL = 7 and 10 cmH2O. It is also worth noting that, for all sizes of Carb airways, there were no changes in lumen area between PL = 0 and 2 cmH2O. Thus there should have been no change in
Raw in this pressure range. It can be seen in Fig. 2 that
this was the case.
|
|
A finding that does depend on airway size is apparent in Fig. 4. The value of Ai/Ai* at PL = 0 cmH2O is greater for small airways than for larger airways. This is true for both Con and Carb airways.
Our observation that the smallest airways are relatively more open than
larger airways [which has also been reported for dogs (18)] can be elucidated from further examination of the
histological sections. Fig. 5 shows
representative photomicrographs of cross-sectioned airways. In the Con
group (Fig. 5, D-F), airways were predominantly round
at PL
4 cmH2O and were narrowed and
flattened at smaller PL values. In the Carb group (Fig. 5,
A-C), airways were round and unfolded at PL = 10 cmH2O (not shown) and circularly narrowed with many
folds at 4 cmH2O. At PL = 0 cmH2O,
Carb airways tended to remain rounded, with many folds. At
PL =
4 cmH2O, these airways tended to be no
longer circular but were somewhat flattened, although the flattening
was to a lesser extent than in Con airways. Thus it appears that there
were two different modes of reduction of lumen area as PL
was reduced. The Con airways flattened and then developed many
epithelial folds, whereas the Carb airways developed many folds then
flattened.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We believe that this is the first reported observation of airway collapse and closure by flattening. It is a puzzling observation as the conceptual model of our experiment was that of a uniformly deflating lung, with snapshots of its morphology taken at six different recoil pressures. An initially circular airway should have stayed circular. We propose that our observations can be understood by using the theory of elastic buckling that was used to explain the mechanics of the folding of the epithelial membrane. When the pressure on the outside of a circular elastic tube is greater than the pressure inside the tube by a critical amount, the tube undergoes elastic buckling into an oval shape that becomes progressively flatter as the Ptm difference is increased. In the case of the epithelial membrane, this flattening is not observed because the membrane is subject to the geometrical constraint of not being able to penetrate the airway smooth muscle layer. It must, therefore, develop folds instead of flattening. We propose that the total airway wall is not so constrained and is thus able to collapse into an oval shape.
An intraparenchymal airway becomes subjected to a collapsing stress
through the interdependence mechanism. The basis for this has been
developed in several modeling studies in which the airway is thought of
as a tube embedded in the foamlike parenchyma (7, 11-13, 15,
16). It may be helpful to think of the airway as a circular tube
that must be inserted into a circular hole in the parenchyma. When the
diameter of the unfilled parenchymal hole, in which the tube is
embedded, is the same size as the outer diameter of the tube, the
stress on the outside of the tube is the same as the stress on the
pleural surface (16). If the tube is bigger than the
(unfilled) hole, the local peribronchial stress will tend to compress
the airway, whereas, if the hole is larger than the airway (as we
expected would happen when the airway smooth muscle shortened), the
local stress will tend to keep the airway open. This is usually
referred to as the "interdependence effect." Experiments that
examined the relationship between airway and parenchymal hole sizes in
excised dog lungs showed that, for the values of PL that
occur around functional residual capacity and for larger airways, the
peribronchial stress is no more than ~1 cmH2O different
from pleural pressure (7, 19). We believe that
our data show that collapsing pressure must occur in the case of our
small rabbit airways. To demonstrate this, we must determine whether
the airway changes size with PL in the same way as the
parenchyma. For a uniformly deflating lung, such as we assume to have
in the present study, linear dimensions scale on the cube root of lung
volume and areas scale on the two-thirds power of lung volume. Hence,
to aid comparison between airway cross-sectional area and the area of a
hole in the parenchyma, in which the airway would be a snug fit at
total lung capacity, we have plotted normalized airway total
cross-sectional area
(Ao/Ao*) and volume
(V/V*)2/3 against PL (Fig.
6). It is apparent that
Ao/Ao* for the
smaller Con airways (small and 1-mm bins) does
not change in the same way with PL as would an unfilled
hole in the parenchyma of a uniformly deflating lung. The hole is much
smaller than the airway at PL < 7 cmH2O (the
larger airways deviate from uniform deflation at PL < 2 cmH2O). Thus, for the small and 1-mm Con airways at these
PLs, the parenchyma adjacent to an airway must be
compressed relative to the parenchyma distant from the airway (Fig.
5D). From this observation, it follows that instead of the
peribronchial stress being equal to pleural pressure, it must be closer
to or even exceed lumen pressure. That is, parenchymal interdependence is causing the airway to compress rather than remain open. When this
compression is sufficiently great, the airway wall buckles elastically,
and the airway starts to flatten (Fig.
7). The mechanics of this are similar to
those for the initial buckling of the epithelial membrane
(9), but, instead of the epithelial membrane, it is the
entire thickness of the airway wall that is involved in the buckling.
This buckling has been described by Hill and colleagues (6), who showed that it is governed by the mechanical and
geometrical properties of not only the wall but also the parenchyma.
They predicted that it could occur at a PL as low as 1 cmH2O. Our results, which indicate a buckling
pressure between 2 and 4 cmH2O, are in accord with this
prediction. The greater value that we observed could indicate that the
stiffness of the folding membrane is greater than assumed by Hill and
colleagues. Once buckling has commenced, the peribronchial stress
probably becomes nonuniform around the perimeter of the airway, with
greater stress on the ends of the long diameter than on the ends of the
short diameter. In the APPENDIX, we show that the
peribronchial stress around a small Con airway at PL = 2 cmH2O is ~2.4 cm H2O, which results in a
collapsing Ptm difference of 0.4 cmH2O. The
same calculation for PL = 0 cmH2O yields a
collapsing Ptm difference of 6 cmH2O. Further
support for our flattening argument is given in Table
3, in which we present the mean values
for the ratio of the short-to-long diameters of the airways at each
PL < 4 cmH2O (at PL
4 cmH2O, we excluded airways for which this value was <0.6,
as explained above.) It is apparent from the data in Table 3 that the
airways flatten (i.e, the ratio decreases) with decreasing
PL and that this flattening is greater for the Con airways
than for the Carb airways. For small and 1-mm Con airways at
PL
2 cmH2O, it appears that the epithelial membrane becomes more folded (Figs. 5 and
8) as the long diameter of the flattened
cross section becomes shorter under the influence of the compressive
stress on the ends of the long diameter of the airway.
|
|
|
|
The question still remains as to why the very smallest airways collapse
the least. Elastic buckling theory shows that a tube's intrinsic
resistance to buckling increases with the cube of the thickness-to-radius ratio. We have no direct measure of this. However,
because WAt/Abm* is
approximately twice the thickness-to-radius ratio of the fully distended airway, it can be seen in Fig.
9 that the smaller airways had relatively
thicker walls, and this could explain their resistance to elastic
buckling.
|
The data in Fig. 8 show that, for all airway sizes, the Carb airways
had more epithelial folds than Con airways at positive PL.
Close to PL = 0 cmH2O, the number of folds is
approximately the same for both treatments. The data also show that the
number of folds increases with airway size. According to the study by Lambert and colleagues (10), the number of folds is
determined not by airway size but by the normalized thickness of the
region between the subepithelial reticular layer and the muscle
layer (called the "submucosa" by those authors, referred to as
"gap" in the present study and the area of the wall cross-section
that it occupies as WAg). Their analysis shows
an inverse relationship between gap thickness and fold number. Thus the
data in Fig. 8 indicate that the normalized gap thickness should be
greater as the size of the airway decreases. We calculated
this thickness (WAg/Abm*) and
present the results in Fig. 10. These
data are in qualitative agreement with the predictions
(10). When we plotted our data in the same
three-dimensional manner as Lambert et al. did with their sheep data,
we obtained a graph that looked very similar to their Fig. 3B
(10). That study also predicted the dependence of
fold number on lumen area. Our results for the pooled data (pooled data
are used to reduce the noise) are shown in Fig.
11. Two things are apparent from this
figure. First, the number of folds increases as the lumen area
decreases. This is in accord with the analysis of Lambert and
colleagues (10) and is contrary to that of Wiggs et al.
(24) and Seow et al. (20). Comparison of our
Fig. 11 with Fig. 2 in Ref. 10 suggests a value of ~0.07 for WAg/Abm*, which
is in agreement with our rabbit data (Fig. 10). Second, the
relationship between fold number and lumen area appears to be the same
for Con and Carb airways, despite the different sequences of collapse
and manner of loading of the membrane.
|
|
There are two other studies in which theories of epithelial membrane folding have been developed (20, 24). Because the values for WAg/Abm* used in those studies are greatly in excess of those observed experimentally, both in this study and others (10, 18), the biological relevance of those theories is called into question.
Figures 3 and 11 show pooled data. These graphs more clearly show the behavior of the airways than the binned data. However, they must be treated with caution, as we did not sample equally in all bin sizes. Our data tended to be clustered in the two bins of smaller airway size because there were many more of these airways to sample. Thus the pooled data are biased toward small airways. Our conclusions are not crucially dependent on the pooled data.
Because only small volume oscillations were applied immediately before the fixation process, it is unlikely that the Carb airway geometry reported in this study conforms to what would exist in vivo when tidal pressure swings are superimposed on the bronchoconstricting stimulus. There is increasing evidence that tidal stretching of airway smooth muscle is an important modulator of airway tone and may be the most important safety factor preventing excessive airway narrowing (4, 22). Although tidal breathing would probably attenuate the degree of muscle shortening and airway narrowing we observed, it is unlikely that it would alter the basic conclusions of this study. The qualitative differences in the behavior of the relaxed and constricted airway at low distending pressures would still be operating.
In summary, our data show that, in a deflating lung, unchallenged (Con) airways flatten with very little mucosal folding and then develop mucosal folds with further lung deflation. On the other hand, challenged (Carb) airways develop many folds as the lung deflates and flatten only at collapsing Ptm values. The observed pattern of folding is in accord with the predictions of the model analysis of Lambert and colleagues (10). Whereas Carb airways have less lumen area than Con airways at distending Ptms, they are more open at collapsing pressures. Our results show that "parenchymal interdependence" imposes a collapsing stress on Con airways at positive PL, which raises the question of whether parenchymal interdependence provides significant support for bronchoconstricted airways at low positive PL. If it is not significant, then folding of the epithelial basement membrane may provide the only mechanical resistance to smooth muscle shortening under these circumstances.
| |
APPENDIX |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is possible to estimate the peribronchial deformation of the
parenchyma and thus to estimate the peribronchial stress
(Px). The normalized radius of an airway is approximately
equal to the smooth muscle outer perimeter divided by the basement
membrane perimeter (Pmo/Pbm). The normalized
radius of a hole in the parenchyma is approximately equal to the cube
root of the normalized volume [(V/V*)1/3]. Thus the
strain,
, is given by the following equation
|
has a value of 0.6. Using the expression for the shear modulus of
rabbit parenchyma deduced by Stamenovic and Yager
(23), µ = (0.5 × PL) + 3 cmH2O, to calculate the peribronchial stress change from
the uniformly inflated state (
Px), yields
Px = 2.4 cmH2O. The same calculation for PL = 0 results in
Px = 6 cmH2O. Because we are using pleural pressure
(Ppl) as reference, the peribronchial stress for an airway that deflates uniformly with the parenchyma is Px = 0 and airway lumen pressure is PL. Thus, for a small circular
Con airway at PL = 2 cmH2O, the pressure on the
outside is 2.4 cmH2O and inside is 2 cmH2O,
resulting in a collapsing Ptm of 0.4 cmH2O.
This calculation is less than rigorous because it uses linear
elasticity theory, which is probably not accurate for such large
deformations. However, the calculation was not made with quantitative
accuracy in mind but, rather, to show the plausibility of our
hypothesis that the parenchyma near a Con airway can be compressed
enough to provide a collapsing Ptm.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported in part by the Medical Research Council of Canada and the New Zealand Lotteries Health Committee. During the course of this investigation, M. Okazawa was a Canadian Lung Association Scholar.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. K. Lambert, Institute of Fundamental Sciences-Physics, Massey Univ., Palmerston North, New Zealand 5331 (E-mail: R.Lambert{at}massey.ac.nz).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 1 September 1999; accepted in final form 23 June 2000.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Bai, A,
Eidelman DH,
Hogg JC,
James AL,
Lambert RK,
Ludwig MS,
Martin J,
McDonald DM,
Mitzner WA,
Okazawa M,
Pack RJ,
Paré PD,
Schellenberg RR,
Tiddens HAWM,
Wagner EM,
and
Yager D.
Proposed nomenclature for quantifying subdivisions of the bronchial wall.
J Appl Physiol
77:
1011-1014,
1994
2.
Dawson, SV,
and
Elliott EA.
Wave-speed limitation on expiratory flow: a unifying concept.
J Appl Physiol
43:
498-515,
1977
3.
Elad, D,
Kamm RD,
and
Shapiro AH.
Mathematical simulation of forced expiration.
J Appl Physiol
65:
14-25,
1988
4.
Fredberg JJ, Inouye D, Miller B, Nathan M, Jafari S, Raboudi SH, Butler
JP, and Shore SA. Airway smooth muscle, tidal stretches, and
dynamically determined contractile states. Am J Respir Crit
Care Med 156: 1997.
5.
Fry, DL.
Theoretical considerations of the bronchial pressure-flow-volume relationships with particular reference to the maximum expiratory flow-volume curve.
Phys Med Biol
3:
174-194,
1958[ISI][Medline].
6.
Hill, MJ,
Wilson TA,
and
Lambert RK.
Effects of surface tension and intraluminal fluid on mechanics of small airways.
J Appl Physiol
82:
233-239,
1997
7.
Lai-Fook, SJ,
Hyatt RE,
and
Rodarte JR.
Effect of parenchymal shear modulus and lung volume on bronchial pressure-diameter behavior.
J Appl Physiol
44:
859-868,
1978
8.
Lambert, RK.
A new computational model for expiratory flow from nonhomogeneous human lungs.
Trans ASME
111:
200-205,
1989.
9.
Lambert, RK.
Role of bronchial basement membrane in airway collapse.
J Appl Physiol
71:
666-673,
1991
10.
Lambert, RK,
Codd SL,
Alley MR,
and
Pack RJ.
Physical determinants of bronchial mucosal folding.
J Appl Physiol
77:
1206-1216,
1994
11.
Lambert, RK,
and
Paré PD.
Lung parenchymal shear modulus, airway wall remodeling, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness.
J Appl Physiol
83:
140-147,
1997
12.
Lambert, RK,
Wiggs BR,
Kuwano K,
Hogg JC,
and
Paré PD.
Functional significance of increased airway smooth muscle in asthma and COPD.
J Appl Physiol
74:
2771-2781,
1993
13.
Lambert, RK,
and
Wilson TA.
A model for the elastic properties of the lung and their effect on expiratory flow.
J Appl Physiol
34:
34-48,
1973
14.
Lambert, RK,
Wilson TA,
Hyatt RE,
and
Rodarte JR.
A computational model for expiratory flow.
J Appl Physiol
52:
44-56,
1982
15.
Macklem, PT.
A theoretical analysis of the effect of airway smooth muscle load on airway narrowing.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
153:
83-89,
1996[Abstract].
16.
Mead, J,
Takishima T,
and
Leith D.
Stress distribution in lungs; a model of pulmonary elasticity.
J Appl Physiol
28:
596-608,
1970
17.
Mead J, Turner JM, Macklem PT, and Little JB. Significance of the
relationship between lung recoil and maximum expiratory flow.
J Appl Physiol 22: 1967.
18.
Okazawa, M,
Vedal S,
Verburgt L,
Lambert RK,
and
Paré PD.
Determinants of airway smooth muscle shortening in excised canine lobes.
J Appl Physiol
78:
608-614,
1995
19.
Sasaki, H,
Hoppin FG,
and
Takishima T.
Peribronchial pressure in excised dog lungs.
J Appl Physiol
45:
858-869,
1978
20.
Seow, CY,
Wang L,
and
Paré PD.
Airway narrowing and internal structural constraints.
J Appl Physiol
88:
527-533,
2000
21.
Shapiro, AH.
Steady flows in collapsible tubes.
Trans ASME
99:
126-147,
1977.
22.
Shen, X,
Gunst SJ,
and
Tepper RS.
Effect of tidal volume and frequency on airway responsiveness in mechanically ventilated rabbits.
J Appl Physiol
83:
1202-1208,
1997
23.
Stamenovic, D,
and
Yager D.
Elastic properties of air- and liquid-filled lung parenchyma.
J Appl Physiol
65:
2565-2570,
1988
24.
Wiggs, BR,
Hrousma CA,
Drazen JM,
and
Kamm RD.
On the mechanism of mucosal folding in normal and asthmatic airways.
J Appl Physiol
83:
1814-1821,
1997
25.
Wiggs, B,
Moreno R,
James A,
Hogg J,
and
Paré P.
A model of the mechanics of airway narrowing in asthma.
In: Asthma, Its Pathology and Treatment, edited by Kalliner MA,
Barnes PJ,
and Persson CGA. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1991, p. 73-101.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. J. Gunst Does airway inflation stretch the bronchial mucosal membrane? J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2005; 99(6): 2059 - 2060. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. B. Noble, A. Sharma, P. K. McFawn, and H. W. Mitchell Elastic properties of the bronchial mucosa: epithelial unfolding and stretch in response to airway inflation J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2005; 99(6): 2061 - 2066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Y. Seow Are you pulling my airway? Eur. Respir. J., November 1, 2005; 26(5): 759 - 761. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. E. McParland, P. D. Pare, P. R. A. Johnson, C. L. Armour, and J. L. Black Airway basement membrane perimeter in human airways is not a constant; potential implications for airway remodeling in asthma J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2004; 97(2): 556 - 563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Sera, H. Fujioka, H. Yokota, A. Makinouchi, R. Himeno, R. C. Schroter, and K. Tanishita Localized compliance of small airways in excised rat lungs using microfocal X-ray computed tomography J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2004; 96(5): 1665 - 1673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Mitzner Airway Smooth Muscle: The Appendix of the Lung Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 2004; 169(7): 787 - 790. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Smiley-Jewell, M. U. Tran, A. J. Weir, Z. A. Johnson, L. S. Van Winkle, and C. G. Plopper Three-dimensional mapping of smooth muscle in the distal conducting airways of mouse, rabbit, and monkey J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2002; 93(4): 1506 - 1514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Lambert, R. Ramchandani, X. Shen, S. J. Gunst, and R. S. Tepper Computational model of airway narrowing: mature vs. immature rabbit J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2002; 93(2): 611 - 619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Latourelle, B. Fabry, and J. J. Fredberg Dynamic equilibration of airway smooth muscle contraction during physiological loading J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2002; 92(2): 771 - 779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Lambert, P. D. Pare, and M. Okazawa Stiffness of peripheral airway folding membrane in rabbits J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2001; 90(6): 2041 - 2047. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||