Journal of Applied Physiology AJP: Cell Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 89: 849-854, 2000;
8750-7587/00 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ronca, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Alberts, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ronca, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Alberts, J. R.
Vol. 89, Issue 2, 849-854, August 2000

HIGHLIGHTED TOPICS
Physiology of a Microgravity Environment Selected Contribution: Effects of spaceflight during pregnancy on labor and birth at 1 G

April E. Ronca1 and Jeffrey R. Alberts2

1 Life Sciences Division, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California 94035; and 2 Department of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The events of parturition (labor, delivery, maternal care, placentophagia, and onset of nursing) were analyzed in female Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) flown on either 11- or 9-day-long spaceflights beginning at the approximate midpoint of their pregnancies. Each space shuttle flight landed on the 20th day of the rats' pregnancies, just 48-72 h before parturition. After spaceflight, dams were continuously monitored and recorded by time-lapse videography throughout the completion of parturition and onset of nursing (days 22 and 23). Analyses of parturition revealed that, compared with ground controls, flight dams displayed twice the number of lordosis contractions, the predominant labor contraction type in rats. The number of vertical contractions (those that immediately precede expulsion of a pup from the womb), the duration of labor, fetal wastage, number of neonates born, neonatal birth weights, placentophagia, and maternal care during parturition, including the onset of nursing, were comparable in flight and ground control dams. Our findings indicate that, with the exception of labor contractions, mammalian pregnancy and parturition remain qualitatively and quantitatively intact after spaceflight during pregnancy.

parturition; microgravity; uterus; abdominal muscle; fetus; newborn; rat


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

THE VARIOUS PROCESSES COMPRISING mammalian pregnancy and parturition evolved within the omnipresent context of the normal gravitational forces on Earth, thus raising the question of whether pregnancy and birth can be successfully sustained in the absence of gravity. In the only previous spaceflight in which pregnant mammals were exposed to microgravity, rats in late stages of pregnancy were flown on the 4.5-day Cosmos-1514 mission in 1983 (9). After this brief flight, four of five dams gave birth to viable litters. Parturition was not observed systematically in the Cosmos study. Also, it is not known how longer flights might affect physiological or behavioral responses of pregnant and parturient females and the process of birth. The most common effects of spaceflight, namely, headward fluid shifts, alterations in bone and calcium metabolism, and muscular deconditioning (5, 8, 10), may provide formidable obstacles to sustaining the gravid state in space and impede the ability of mothers to give birth.

Of particular concern are the potential effects of spaceflight muscle deconditioning on the musculature of pregnant dams in the days preceding parturition. For example, expulsion of the conceptus may be compromised because of deconditioning of the transverse abdominus, an antigravity muscle in tetrapods (6).

Much is known about parturition in the Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus) (4, 14, 15). At the time of birth, the female rat's behavior is centered on the processes of delivery and the products of birth, namely, the fetuses, placentas, and birth fluids (8). The entire process begins just a few hours before birth with the transition from infrequent, low-amplitude uterine contractions to regular, more intense contractions. This shift signals the onset of labor (4, 15). Direct measurements of intrauterine pressure in rats suggest that, near parturition, the rat fetus is exposed to contractions approaching 20 mmHg (7). We previously described and quantified labor and delivery in the rat using 24-h time-lapse videography (15). Several behaviorally distinct types of uterine contractions can be observed during labor. During a lordosis contraction, the dam lies on her ventrum and elongates her body, often arching her back and elevating her outstretched hindlimbs off the ground. More than 70 lordosis contractions may be observed during a typical birth, at intervals less than 35 s apart during the last hour of labor. Lordosis contractions predominate before the birth of the first pup and are believed to transport the conceptus into the lower birth canal. Vertical contractions, observed just before the birth of a pup, consist of a series of rapid, bilateral abdominal lifts. Rat dams typically deliver from 8 to 12 pups over a period of 40-140 min. Elements of maternal behavior, such as licking and retrieving, emerge when the first pup is expelled from the womb. At birth, the mother licks the neonate, removing its birth membranes, thereby helping to initiate postnatal breathing (13). The onset of nursing occurs soon after the last pup is born.

In the present experiment, we tested hypotheses that mammalian pregnancy and parturition can survive exposure to sustained periods of spaceflight. On the basis of the brief Cosmos-1514 mission, we predicted that pregnant rats flown on longer (11 and 9 day) missions would also complete their 22-day pregnancies and undergo vaginal deliveries but that parturition would not be successful for all rat dams. The longer period of spaceflight exposure relative to the Cosmos mission was predicted to increase fetal losses and reduce the number of live births. We predicted specific effects on labor contractions at the time of parturition, mediated via spaceflight-induced changes in uterine contractile proteins (3) and abdominal musculature (6). We also hypothesized that labor contractions would be less effective after spaceflight exposure, possibly lengthening the birth process. We also predicted postflight behavioral changes such as reduced appetite and lethargy and thus quantified the dams' postflight feeding, drinking, and locomotion. Characteristic maternal responses to the young during parturition were analyzed to test the hypothesis that patterns of maternal care would be disrupted after spaceflight.

The data presented are derived from two spaceflight missions jointly sponsored by National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) and are called the Rodent 1 (NIH.R1) and Rodent 2 (NIH.R2) missions. Ten rat dams were flown on each mission, launched at the approximate midpoint of pregnancy [gestational day (GD) 9 for NIH.R1 and GD11 for NIH.R2] and landed close to the time of parturition (GD20 of the rat's 22-day pregnancy). The mission lengths were 11 and 9 days, respectively. The dams on each flight were treated similarly. Continuous postflight video surveillance of both NIH.R1 and NIH.R2 rat dams, including time-lapse recordings of labor and delivery, permitted us to replicate the parturition analyses. This was particularly important because the NIH.R1 study involved performing a unilateral hysterectomy on each dam soon after recovery on GD20, the major difference between the two flights. This was done so that both fetal and neonatal samples could be obtained from each of the NIH.R1 subjects (1).


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Subjects. Forty nulliparous, pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats (Taconic Farms, Germantown, NY) weighing between 165 and 205 g were used. The time-bred dams were shipped to Kennedy Space Center (KSC) on GD2 (spermatozoa positive = GD1). Animals were housed in a room with controlled lighting (6 AM to 6 PM) and temperature (~22°C). Pregnant rats were housed individually in standard vivarium cages (47 cm × 26 cm × 21 cm) with corncob bedding material. Rat chow and water were available ad libitum. All animal procedures adhered to NASA guidelines and the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. [DHHS Publication No. (NIH) 85-23, Revised 1985, Office of Science and Health Reports, Bethesda, MD 20892].

Treatment of dams. Two treatment groups were used in these experiments. For each study, 10 dams were housed in groups of five in flight animal modules (described in Surgical laparotomy of the NIH.R1 and NIH.R2 dams, below) and exposed to launch, spaceflight, and landing (flight group). Synchronous control dams (n = 10) were treated identically to flight animals but were not exposed to launch, landing, or spaceflight. These animals were run at the same gestational ages as the flight group but with a 24-h delay relative to the flight group to allow time for downlinking from the shuttle of the previous day's environmental conditions. In this way, environmental parameters (i.e., temperature, humidity, and exposure to augmented lighting during video recording) onboard the shuttle could be mimicked for the synchronous control group. The preflight (12:12 h) light-dark cycle was maintained in the housing for both the flight and ground groups. Before flight, dams were carefully matched according to weight across flight and synchronous control conditions.

Maternal surgeries. All experimental dams sustained two surgical procedures during the study (described below). On GD7, surgical laparotomy was performed to confirm pregnancy and establish the number of implantation sites. Dams were selected for inclusion in the study only if a minimum of five embryos populated each of their paired uterine horns. On GD20, immediately after recovery from the space shuttle, the NIH.R1 dams (but not the NIH.R2 dams) were given a unilateral hysterectomy under anesthesia, yielding for immediate analysis of fetuses from all 10 dams (i.e., n = 10). The same dams then recovered from anesthesia, completed gestation, and underwent vaginal delivery of pups from the remaining uterine horn, thereby providing neonates for postnatal analyses (n = 10). The NIH.R2 dams were either observed until birth (n = 6) or dissected on recovery (n = 4). Only the dams that underwent parturition are discussed in this report.

Surgical laparotomy of the NIH.R1 and NIH.R2 dams. Laparotomy was conducted on flight and synchronous control dams under aseptic conditions on GD7, the earliest day on which implantation sites (decidual swellings) can be reliably visualized. This procedure is described elsewhere (1). Briefly, the dam was anesthetized with isoflurane (IsoFlo, Abbott Labs, North Chicago, IL) vapor using a nonrebreathing rodent anesthesia unit (Viking Products, Medford Lakes, NJ). The fur overlying the abdomen of the anesthetized rat was shaved, the skin was cleansed with antiseptic and alcohol, a veterinary opthalmic ointment was applied, and an antibiotic and analgesic mixture [Microcillin, Anthony Products, Arcadia, CA (10,000 IU) and butorphanol tartrate, Fort Dodge Labs, Fort Dodge, IA (10 mg/kg)] was given by subcutaneous injection. An incision was made, beginning ~2 cm cranial to the pubis and extending cranially 2-3 cm. Each uterine horn was gently grasped between decidual swellings and gently externalized for close visual inspection and counts of implantation site, which were recorded. The uteruses were carefully reinserted into the abdominal cavity, after which interrupted sutures were used to close the peritoneum and muscle layer. The overlying skin was then closed with 9-mm wound clips. The entire procedure lasted 10 min.

On GD8 for NIH.R1 and on GD10 for NIH.R2, the flight and synchronous control dams were housed in groups of five within an animal enclosure module (AEM), which is NASA's flight cage for group-housed adult rodents. The animal chamber portion of the AEM is a stainless steel mesh cage, ~23.5 × 35.6 × 21.6 cm (in Earth-gravity orientation). Food was available in the form of food bars, each about 2.5 × 2.5 × 20 cm, which were attached to the walls of the AEM. These foodbars are fabricated from a commercial diet (Teklad Diets, Madison, WI) and are nutritionally complete and resistent to spoilage. Water was available from any of four Lixit valves that protrude from a 21 × 11.1 × 15.2 cm stainless steel box within the AEM. With the water system and food bars in place, the AEM is a compact volume for five pregnant rats. Airflow through the AEM is controlled by external fans that create a near-laminar flow moving from ceiling to floor (in normal Earth gravity orientation); the effluent airstream moves through the waste tray containing activated charcoal and absorbent filter.

Unilateral hysterectomy of the NIH.R1 dams. The purpose of the unilateral hysterectomy was to provide a sample of fetuses soon after return from spaceflight (see Ref. 1 for further background and discussion of the rationale). Within 3 h after recovery from spaceflight, the first flight dam was anesthetized. Anesthesia and surgical preparations were identical to those described for the laparotomy procedure on GD7. The uterine horns were exteriorized by extending the midventral abdominal incision. The uterine horn removed was alternated across rats in each treatment group. The horn was ligated cranially and caudally with braided silk (20, Ethicon, Somerville, NJ) and then excised. The incision was closed by following the procedures used for laparotomy.

Video recording of labor and birth. Within several hours of both recovery and unilateral hysterectomy (NIH.R1) or recovery (NIH.R2), the dams were housed singly in Plexiglas observation cages (12.5 cm × 8.5 cm × 9.25 cm) lined with corn cob bedding and placed in a vivarium. Food bars were placed on the cage floor, and Lixit spouts were positioned near the base of the cage to facilitate the mothers' access to food and water. Daily records of food bar consumption, water intake, and body weight were maintained for the remainder of the study. The dams were videotaped continuously beginning soon after recovery until the completion of parturition and the onset of nursing. A mirror was angled at the rear of each observation cage to permit camera views from both the front and rear of the cage. Cages were positioned four per camera view. Red lighting was illuminated during the dark phase to enable 24-h video data collection (12:1 record-to-playback ratio).

Data analysis. Video data were analyzed by trained scorers during real-time playback of the videotapes time locked to a computerized event-scoring program (13). Briefly, the amount of time dams spent feeding, drinking, or ambulating was quantified with the use of this system. Interrater reliability (IRR) for these measures was R2 > 0.99. The number and duration of labor contractions, number of neonates born, placentophagia (ingestion of placenta), the total duration of birth, maternal care (licking and handling of neonates), and the onset of nursing were also encoded from the video recordings (IRR was R2 > 0.98). Individual data were expressed as litter means and analyzed with the use of ANOVA, t-tests, or simple regression.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

NIH.R1 and NIH.R2 dams at recovery. Because of inclement weather, the shuttle carrying the NIH.R1 payload landed at the Hugh Dryden Flight Research Facility (HDFRF) alternate landing site in California. Within 3 h of landing, the rats were delivered to the payload receiving facility. The dams were then carefully unloaded from the AEMs, given a health examination, and weighed. Dam body weight gains at shuttle load and unload were identical in the flight and synchronous control groups (percent change from GD9 to GD20 as follows: flight = 45.7 ± 2.0 and synchronous control = 42.4 ± 1.7%; not significant). All of the dams were deemed to be in good condition. Unilateral hysterectomy was performed on the flight group dams without complication. Over the next several hours, the dams showed characteristic signs of recovery from general anesthesia and surgery.

The NIH.R2 payload landed at KSC. Within 3-4 h of landing, the dams were given postflight health checks and weighed. NIH.R2 dam body weight gains at shuttle load to unload were significantly different in the flight and synchronous control groups [percent change from GD11 to GD20 as follows: flight = 23.8 ± 1.0 and synchronous control = 28.6 ± 1.0%; t(18) = -4.1, P < 0.001]. Six flight dams and six synchronous control dams entered nest cages without manipulation.

Readaptation of flight dams to 1 G. In contrast to the NIH.R1 dams, which received postflight surgery (i.e., unilateral hysterectomy), data from the NIH.R2 dams provide an unbiased perspective of the effects of spaceflight on pregnant mothers' behavioral readaptation to 1 G. These data are shown in Fig. 1. Results of the time-lapse analyses are presented across three consecutive 12-h time intervals beginning with the dark phase of the circadian cycle on GD20 [corresponding to recovery (R) + 12 h (R + 12)] and ending 36 h later (at R + 48), coincident with the onset of the light phase of the cycle on GD22. This analysis revealed that flight dams ambulated less than did synchronous control dams [Fig. 1A; gravity F(1,10) = 14.5, P < 0.01; Newman-Keuls test, P > 0.05] but only during the dark phase of the circadian cycle [time interval F(2,20) = 12.5, P < 0.001; gravity × time interval F(2,20) = 7.5; Newman-Keuls, P > 0.05]. During the light phase of the cycle (R + 24 and R + 36), a floor effect was observed that obscured potential group differences: both flight and synchronous control dams locomoted for less than 5% of the observation interval during the lights-on period. Despite the reduced activity of the flight dams during the dark phase of the cycle, the amount of time dams spent eating and drinking was equivalent to that of synchronous dams (Fig. 1B; gravity F < 1), and the typical circadian rhythm of feeding behavior was observed [time interval F(2,20) = 29.3; P < 0.0001].


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Behavioral readaptation of National Institutes of Health (NIH) Rodent 2 (NIH.R2) flight and synchronous control dams to 1 G (n = 6 per condition). Locomotion (top) and eating and drinking (bottom) across consecutive 12-h dark-light-dark periods beginning at 6 PM on gestational day (GD) 20 [recovery (R) + 12h (R + 12)], at 6 AM on GD21 (R + 24), and at 6 PM on GD21 (R + 36). Locomotion differed across flight and synchronous dams during the dark phase of the circadian cycle (*P < 0.05); eating and drinking were identical across the groups.

Labor in flight dams. Dams from both flights began labor at the expected time (on GD22 and GD23) with three exceptions: two NIH.R1 flight dams and one synchronous dam did not show signs of impending parturition by 1500 on GD23. In accordance with predetermined project requirements, the neonates of these dams were delivered by cesarean section. There was no corresponding requirement for NIH.R2; however, cesarean delivery was performed on one dam from the flight because she appeared to be in distress during labor. Video failure caused data from two additional NIH.R1 control animals to be lost. We present complete data from eight flight dams and seven synchronous control dams for NIH.R1 and from five flight dams and six synchronous control dams for NIH.R2.

Figure 2 shows the results of the labor analyses for the two flights. Beginning 6 h before the birth of the first pup and throughout parturition, NIH.R1 flight dams exhibited over two times more lordosis contractions than did synchronous control dams [Fig. 2, solid bars; t(13) = 3.0, P < 0.01]. Vertical contractions were unaffected by spaceflight [t(13) = 0.50, not significant]. Although contraction numbers differed, the average duration of lordosis contractions was identical in the two groups (flight = 19.2 ± 2.0 s, synchronous control = 19.2 ± 2.3 s).


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Top: behavioral expression of a lordosis contraction in the parturient rat dam. Bottom: number of lordosis contractions observed in NIH Rodent 1 (NIH.R1) (n = 15) and NIH.R2 (n = 12) flight (left) and synchronous control (right) dams. Observations antedated the birth of the first pup by 6 h and continued until the birth of the last pup. The number of lordosis contractions observed in flight and synchronous dams differed from one another (*P < 0.05). Note: NIH.R1 dams underwent unilateral hysterectomy before parturition.

Precisely the same pattern of results was observed in the NIH.R2 dams [Fig. 2, open bars; t(9) = 3.9, P < 0.01]. Vertical contractions did not differ across groups (not significant).

Birth. The dams successfully delivered strong and viable pups. Table 1 shows the number of decidual swellings, the numbers of neonates born, neonatal birth weights, total duration of birth, ingestion of placentas (placentophagia), and maternal behavior during parturition, as measured by licking and retrieving of neonates. In contrast to our initial prediction, morbidity was very low. For NIH.R1, 4 of 60 pups born to flight dams and 1 of 58 pups born to synchronous dams were found dead on the day of birth. For each of the other measures, identical results were obtained for flight and synchronous conditions. The results of the two flights were highly consistent with each other.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Number of decidual swellings, number of neonates born, neonatal birth weights, total duration of birth, placentophagia, and maternal care (licking and handling) of neonates during parturition at 1 G in pregnant dams flown on the NIH.R1 and NIH.R2 missions and synchronous control dams


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The pregnant spaceflight dams returned to Earth in good condition. For NIH.R1, weight gain of dams during flight, particularly important to the fetuses developing in utero, was comparable to the weight gain of ground control dams. This finding is consistent with normal Earth gravity body weight gains seen in adult male rats during 14-day spaceflight missions (14). NIH.R2 flight dams gained about 5% less than synchronous controls, but differences were not observed in any other measure of maternal, fetal, or neonatal outcome after flight. Body weights of dams in the flight and synchronous control conditions were identical at launch for both flights. Because the NIH.R2 mission was 2 days less in duration than the NIH.R1 mission, one possibility is that initial postflight weight loss was fully regained in flight on the longer 11-day mission (NIH.R1) but not achieved by 9 days (NIH.R2). Additional studies are needed to characterize profiles of body mass change in pregnant animals following launch, on orbit, and on recovery from space.

The major finding of our analyses is that flight dams had uncomplicated, successful vaginal deliveries. Parturition occurred at the appropriate gestational time. Number and size of the litters were equivalent to those of controls. Because we had noted during preflight laparotomy the number of implantation sites in the uterine horns of each dam on the 7th day of pregnancy, we were also able to determine that fetal loss, i.e., the difference between the number of implantations and number of pups born to each dam, was equivalent between groups. These findings were seen in both the NIH.R1 and NIH.R2 flight groups. The correspondence between these two data sets is striking particularly because the NIH.R2 dams were not surgically manipulated before collection of observational data.

Readaptation of flight dams to 1 G. The NIH.R2 dams provided the first systematic and continuous observational data ever collected on the postflight readaptation of rats to 1 G. The flight dams were generally less active than the synchronous control dams, as indicated by reduced ambulation during the dark (active) phase of the circadian cycle. There were differences in time spent eating and drinking between the flight dams and the synchronous controls, and both groups followed characteristic circadian fluctuations. The postflight reduction in the locomotor activity of dams is analogous to that of pregnant dams undergoing adaptation from the normal 1 G on Earth to 1.5-G hypergravity (14).

Labor after spaceflight. Labor contractions were affected by spaceflight during pregnancy. The NIH.R2 dams did not receive the abdominal surgery shortly before labor; therefore, their data are not confounded in any way. Nevertheless, the pattern of results from the two spaceflights was strikingly clear and reliable.

Quantification of lordosis contractions encoded during playback of the video recordings revealed that dams from both flights displayed dramatically more lordosis contractions than did synchronous controls. From the 6 h before parturition until the birth of the last pup, flight dams had, on average, twice the number of contractions compared with controls. Despite this difference, both the number of vertical contractions and the duration of visible labor were unaffected.

One interpretation of the increased number of contractions is that the contractions were less efficacious in the flight animals; thus additional contractions were required to perform the work of moving fetuses through the uterus and into the birth canal. Uterine tissue analyzed from the NIH.R2 dams revealed reductions in connexin 43, the major gap junction protein in myometrium (3). Uterine levels of connexin 26, located primarily in endometrial epithelial cells, were unchanged. It was suggested that decreased connexin 43 alters synchronization and coordination of labor contractions, resulting in a requirement for more labor contractions to complete parturition. Reports on the histological status of the dams' musculature provide some insight into the consequences of spaceflight deconditioning on the abdominal muscles, many of which serve postural (i.e., antigravitational) functions as well as participate in the dramatic labor contractions. Fejtek and Wassersug (6) reported that certain abdominal muscle groups showed the kinds of decreases in fiber diameter associated with unloading and weakening. The transverse abdominus was among those that reflected such loss, and weakness of this muscle group may have contributed to the requirement for additional contractions. In contrast, the external obliques did not show the expected atrophy. The seemingly paradoxical differences between these abdominal muscle groups can be resolved by combining the anatomic results with observations of the dams' in-flight behavior.

We analyzed video recordings of the pregnant dams in the AEMs that were taken during flight (2). We devised a kinematic coding scheme by which we classified and quantified the movements made by dams in space and in the 1-G synchronous control condition. With this analytic scheme, we found that movements involving pitch and yaw were approximately equivalent in the flight and synchronous animals. In contrast, flight dams displayed about seven times more rolling movements than did synchronous controls. This astounding difference, we think, can be explained as a consequence of the increased number of surfaces available in microgravity for ambulating and crawling. Many of the movements from surface to surface involve rolling movements along the rat's body axis (the z axis).

Thus, within the weightless environment of space, the external obliques are likely to be exercised by the mechanics of the dams' rolling movements, the type of activity frequently observed in microgravity but rarely on Earth. In contrast, the transverse abdominus muscles are probably used minimally under conditions of weightlessness, where postural control involves little effort; hence, these muscles are not maintained as well as they are in the synchronous controls. During exposure of the pregnant females to spaceflight, decreased uterine connexin 43 and deconditioning of the transverse abdominus may have synergistically reduced the effectiveness of uterine contractions.

Birth and maternal care of neonates after spaceflight. Although more contractions may have been required for parturition in the flight group, this difference did not affect the duration or temporal patterns of birth. The flight dams appeared to be competent mothers. Maternal licking and handling of neonates during parturition and the consumption of birth fluids and membranes (i.e., placentophagia) were indistinguishable in flight and synchronous control dams. Within 3 h of birth, mammary tissue was visually inspected and mammary gland metabolic activity was analyzed (11). These studies indicated that the dams' were physiologically prepared for lactation.

In conclusion, the NIH.R1 and NIH.R2 spaceflight experiments provide a convincing database for the feasibility of studying mammalian development under spaceflight conditions. It appears that the latter half of the dams' pregnancy and the offsprings' gestation can withstand the novel challenge of microgravity conditions. The maternal-fetal system is superbly adaptable indeed, for it can adjust to conditions never before sustained during ontogenesis anytime or anywhere on Earth.

One of the most surprising findings from the space shuttle studies was the dams' ability to have successful vaginal delivery following spaceflight deconditioning for most of the second half of the pregnancy. It must be recognized, however, that the pregnant rats were not immune to the deconditioning effects of space. They showed the typical profile of postural and locomotor signs of postflight muscle weakening. Moreover, there was clearly a difference in their labor contractions, indicating that we must be vigilant in future ventures, particularly with exposures of longer duration.

Observational data of the rats' in-flight behavior provided insights important to understanding spaceflight effects on the bodies of dams as well as identifying potential concerns for newborns. Labor contractions during birth provide an important source of perinatal stimulation that promotes breathing and organized suckling in the neonate (13). Maternal effects on offspring are potentially significant interpretive issues that should be considered in future studies involving mammalian development under altered gravity conditions.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We acknowledge Regina Abel, Michael Armbruster, Karen Cabell, Cheryl Galvani, Kieu Lam, Nicole Mills, Erika Roldan, and David Tanner for assistance with data collection and analysis. We thank Joe Calabrese, Debra Reiss-Bubenheim, Paula Dumars, Carol Elland, Nichola Hawes, Dana Leonard, Vera Vizar, Sharon Yavrom, and other members of the science support team at KSC, HDFRF, and NASA Ames Research Center. We acknowledge the crews of the STS-66 and STS-70 flights, especially mission specialist J. T. Tanner. We also thank the anonymous reviewers of this manuscript for their critical comments.


    FOOTNOTES

This work was supported by NASA Grants NCC2-870 and NAS121-10-40 and by National Institute of Mental Health Grants MH-46485 and MH-28355.

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: A. E. Ronca, Life Sciences Division, Bldg. 261, Rm 111, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California 94035 (E-mail: aronca{at}mail.arc.nasa.gov).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 3 May 2000; accepted in final form 30 May 2000.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1.   Alberts, JR, Burden HW, Hawes N, and Ronca AE. Sampling pre- and postnatal offspring from individual rat dams enhances animal use without compromising development. Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci 35: 61-65, 1996[Medline].

2.   Alberts, JR, and Ronca AE. Behavior of pregnant rats in space: a key to interpreting spaceflight effects on perinates (Abstract). Dev Psychobiol 30: 240, 1997.

3.   Burden, HW, Zary JT, and Alberts JR. Effects of spaceflight on the immunohistochemical demonstration of connexin 26 and connexin 43 in the postpartum uterus of rats. J Reprod Fertil 116: 98-102, 1999.

4.   Dollinger, MJ, Holloway WR, and Denenberg VH. Parturition in the rat (Rattus norvegicus): normative aspects and temporal patterning of behaviors. Behav Proc 5: 21-37, 1980.

5.   Edgerton, VR, and Roy RR. Neuromuscular adaptation to actual and simulated weightlessness. Adv Space Biol Med 4: 33-67, 1994[Medline].

6.   Fejtek, M, and Wassersug R. Effects of laparotomy, cage type, gestation period and spaceflight on abdominal muscles of pregnant rodents. J Exp Zool 284: 252-264, 1999[Web of Science][Medline].

7.   Fuchs, AR. Uterine activity in late pregnancy and during parturition in the rat. Biol Reprod 1: 344-353, 1969[Abstract].

8.   Johnson, RB. The bearable lightness of being: bones, muscles and spaceflight. Anat Rec 253: 24-27, 1998[Medline].

9.   Mains, RC, and Gomersall EG (Editors). Final Reports of U. S. Monkey and Rat Experiments Flown on the Soviet Satellite Cosmos 1514. NASA Technical Memorandum 88223. Washington, DC: GPO, 1986, p. 145-188.

10.   Nicogossian, AE, Huntoon CL, and Pool SL (Editors). Space Physiology and Medicine (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger, 1989.

11.   Plaut, K, Maple RL, Vyas C, Munaim S, Darling AJ, Casey TM, and Alberts JR. The effects of spaceflight on mammary metabolism in pregnant rats. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 222: 85-89, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

13.   Ronca, AE, Abel RA, and Alberts JR. Perinatal stimulation and adaptation of the neonate. Acta Pediat Suppl 415: 8-15, 1996.

14.  Ronca AE, Baer LA, Mills N, Sajdel-Sulkowska EM, and Wade CE. Body mass, food and water intake and activity of pregnant and lactating rat dams during 15-g centrifugation. J Gravit Physiol In press.

15.   Ronca, AE, Lamkin CA, and Alberts JR. Maternal contributions to sensory experience in the fetal and newborn rat (Rattus norvegicus). J Comp Psychol 107: 61-74, 1993[Web of Science][Medline].

16.   Rosenblatt, JS, and Lehrman DS. Maternal behavior in the laboratory rat. In: Maternal Behavior in Mammals, edited by Reingold HL.. New York: Wiley, 1963, p. 8-57.

17.   Wade, CE, Harper JS, Daunton NG, Corcoran ML, and Morey-Holton E. Body mass change during altered gravity: spaceflight, centrifugation, and return to 1-G. J Grav Physiol 4: 43-48, 1997[Medline].


J APPL PHYSIOL 89(2):849-854
8750-7587/00 $5.00 Copyright © 2000 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. Tou, A. Ronca, R. Grindeland, and C. Wade
Models to Study Gravitational Biology of Mammalian Reproduction
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2002; 67(6): 1681 - 1687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. E. Ronca, L. A. Baer, N. G. Daunton, and C. E. Wade
Maternal Reproductive Experience Enhances Early Postnatal Outcome Following Gestation and Birth of Rats in Hypergravity
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2001; 65(3): 805 - 813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ronca, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Alberts, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ronca, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Alberts, J. R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online