|
|
||||||||
The John Rankin Laboratory of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53705
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our study was concerned with the effect of brain hypoxia on cardiorespiratory control in the sleeping dog. Eleven unanesthetized dogs were studied; seven were prepared for vascular isolation and extracorporeal perfusion of the carotid body to assess the effects of systemic [and, therefore, central nervous system (CNS)] hypoxia (arterial PO2 = 52, 45, and 38 Torr) in the presence of a normocapnic, normoxic, and normohydric carotid body during non-rapid eye movement sleep. A lack of ventilatory response to systemic boluses of sodium cyanide during carotid body perfusion demonstrated isolation of the perfused carotid body and lack of other significant peripheral chemosensitivity. Four additional dogs were carotid body denervated and exposed to whole body hypoxia for comparison. In the sleeping dog with an intact and perfused carotid body exposed to specific CNS hypoxia, we found the following. 1) CNS hypoxia for 5-25 min resulted in modest but significant hyperventilation and hypocapnia (minute ventilation increased 29 ± 7% at arterial PO2 = 38 Torr); carotid body-denervated dogs showed no ventilatory response to hypoxia. 2) The hyperventilation was caused by increased breathing frequency. 3) The hyperventilatory response developed rapidly (<30 s). 4) Most dogs maintained hyperventilation for up to 25 min of hypoxic exposure. 5) There were no significant changes in blood pressure or heart rate. We conclude that specific CNS hypoxia, in the presence of an intact carotid body maintained normoxic and normocapnic, does not depress and usually stimulates breathing during non-rapid eye movement sleep. The rapidity of the response suggests a chemoreflex meditated by hypoxia-sensitive respiratory-related neurons in the CNS.
carotid body; hypoxic depression; chemoreceptors; hypocapnia
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
OUR STUDY WAS CONCERNED with the effect of brain hypoxia on cardiorespiratory control in the sleeping dog. The effects of central nervous system (CNS) hypoxia are controversial; some of this controversy may result because the effects of CNS hypoxia appear to be critically dependent on the experimental preparation used. Hypoxic depression of ventilation has been clearly demonstrated in anesthetized animals that have been carotid body denervated, have been made hypoxemic with CO (27, 28, 32), or have specific pontomedullary hypoxia (51). In contrast, when hypoxia was applied to carotid body-denervated awake animals, most studies reported that ventilation was unchanged or increased rather than depressed (4-6, 8, 13, 20, 22, 25, 35, 45). However, Miller and Tenney (29) did observe alveolar hypoventilation in response to hypoxia in unanesthetized, carotid body-denervated cats. In awake goats with carotid bodies maintained normoxic and normocapnic by means of extracorporeal perfusion, a marked ventilatory stimulation was observed in response to specific CNS normocapnic hypoxia (11).
On the basis of the limited data available in physiological preparations, the effects of CNS hypoxia on ventilatory control appear to be critically dependent on such key factors as state of consciousness, whether the carotid chemoreceptors are intact, and the duration of hypoxia (3). Our studies provide new information about the controversial problem of CNS hypoxic effects on ventilatory control, because 1) we used a preparation with an intact, as opposed to denervated, carotid body, 2) we studied the effects of CNS hypoxia in non-rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, and 3) we examined the cardiorespiratory responses to CNS hypoxia over a wide range of systemic hypoxia [arterial PO2 (PaO2) = 35-55 Torr] and duration of hypoxic exposure (seconds to minutes).
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Seven mixed-breed female dogs (20-25 kg) were used in the study. Our protocol and methods were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Chronic Instrumentation
Two surgical sessions were required, separated by
2 wk. All surgery
was performed under general anesthesia (~1% halothane in
O2) with use of sterile technique. Appropriate pre- and
postoperative medications were administered (antibiotics and analgesics).
In the first surgical session, we implanted a catheter in the abdominal aorta via a small branch of the right femoral artery. Fine-wire electrodes were sewn into the crural diaphragm via a small thoracotomy at T8-9. A five-lead electroencephalogram (EEG)/electrooculogram montage was installed subcutaneously over the cranium and near each orbit. All catheters and electrode leads were tunneled subcutaneously and exteriorized near the scapulae. Arterial catheters were filled with 10,000 U/ml heparin solution when not in use.
In the second session, we prepared one group of dogs for carotid body
perfusion (Fig. 1) (48). We confirmed
vascular isolation of the carotid sinus region by manually occluding
the common carotid artery and external carotid artery and withdrawing
blood via the cannulated lingual artery. The carotid sinus region would
visibly collapse and remain collapsed if vascular isolation was
successful. Catheters were tunneled subcutaneously and exteriorized in
the dorsal aspect of the neck. Catheters were filled with 10,000 U/ml (arterial) or 1,000 U/ml (venous) heparin solution when not in use. The
animals were allowed
24 h of recovery before studies began. No
studies were performed until body temperature and breathing frequency
were within normal limits for a given dog.
|
In a second group of dogs, we performed bilateral carotid body denervation by isolating both carotid sinus regions and stripping away the surrounding tissue. Successful denervation was confirmed after recovery (1-2 days postdenervation) by means of bolus injections of sodium cyanide.
Carotid Body Perfusion
Dogs lay unrestrained on a bed in an air-conditioned, sound-attenuated chamber. The extracorporeal perfusion circuit was primed with ~800 ml of saline, 120 ml of autologous blood, and 5,000 U of heparin (derived from beef lung; supplemented with 2,500 U/h). PCO2, PO2, and pH in the perfusion circuit were matched to a given dog's eupneic values by adjustment of the gas concentrations supplying the circuit and by addition of NaHCO3. The carotid sinus region was perfused at flow rates <100 ml/min, which raised the pressure in the sinus region by 5-10 Torr. Before data acquisition, a 30-min period of normal perfusion of the carotid sinus region was used to ensure uniformity between systemic and extracorporeal circuit blood.Measurements
Ventilatory variables were obtained via a tight-fitting facemask connected to a heated pneumotachograph. Crural diaphragm electromyogram (EMG) signals were amplified and recorded as raw signals and as a moving time average (rectified; 100-ms time constant; CWE). One-milliliter arterial and circuit blood samples were obtained at regular intervals from the aortic catheter or circuit and analyzed for pH, PCO2, and PO2 on a blood-gas analyzer (model ABL-300, Radiometer). The blood-gas analyzer was validated daily with dog blood tonometered with three different combinations of PO2 and PCO2 covering the range encountered in the experiments. Samples were corrected to the dog's rectal temperature and also for any tonometer corrections. Except during blood sampling, blood pressure was recorded continuously from the aortic catheter. Airway PO2 and PCO2 were recorded continuously from the facemask and analyzed by a mass spectrometer (model MGA-1100, Perkin-Elmer).Protocol
Normocapnic, normoxic, and normohydric carotid body perfusion was maintained throughout each trial, thus maintaining normal conditions at the carotid body, despite systemic ("CNS hypoxia") hypoxia. Each trial was performed during stable non-REM sleep (occasional brief state changes were encountered, but data from these periods were not used), and there were 6-14 trials per dog. Each carotid body perfusion trial consisted of a 5- to 10-min control period followed by 5-25 min of systemic hypoxia at one of three levels: mild (PaO2
52 Torr), moderate
(PaO2
45 Torr), and severe
(PaO2
38 Torr). Each dog underwent a
similar protocol before the carotid sinus isolation surgery to provide
the "whole body" hypoxic response data reported here (i.e., both
carotid bodies and CNS were hypoxic).
The carotid body-denervated dogs were exposed to three levels of hypoxia similar to those described above for 5-10 min each during periods of wakefulness or non-REM sleep. At least 15 min elapsed between trials.
Data Analysis
Mean data were collected from 1-min segments of data for a given condition and time point. Statistical comparisons were made with Friedman's repeated-measures test on ranks combined with Dunnett's test for multiple comparisons with control. Changes were considered significant if P < 0.05.| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Eupneic Control
Eupneic, air-breathing control measurements were obtained in each dog in two different conditions: 1) before surgical preparation for carotid body perfusion (i.e., both carotid bodies were intact) and 2) after the dogs had been surgically prepared for carotid body perfusion (i.e., with unilateral carotid body denervation and perfusion catheters in place; see METHODS). In the second condition the dogs were carotid body perfused for
5 min with blood that closely
approximated their normal, non-carotid body-perfused eupneic values
while breathing room air (carotid body
PCO2 = 38.4 ± 1.3 Torr, carotid
body PO2 = 99.7 ± 3.9 Torr, carotid
body pH = 7.386 ± 0.02). In both conditions, measurements were
obtained after
5 min of air breathing during non-REM sleep before
each trial of systemic hypoxia induced via reduced inspired O2 fraction. In both types of eupnea, typical canine
arterial blood gases and pH and stable ventilatory patterns were
observed (Table 1), although
the postoperative controls showed a mild hyperpnea due to increased
breathing frequency and tidal volume (VT). All dogs
manifested this mild hyperpnea (but not hyperventilation) postoperatively, probably because of the slightly elevated body temperatures (0.2 ± 0.2°C) encountered in the postoperative
period. We showed previously (47) that carotid body perfusion per se has no effect on ventilation when perfusate blood gases and pH values
are matched to eupneic values.
|
Transient Ventilatory Responses to Hypoxia
Whole body hypoxia.
We use data from our most severe level of hypoxia
(PaO2 = 37.5 ± 0.8 Torr) to illustrate
the transition from air breathing to hypoxia (Fig.
2). All dogs responded rapidly to hypoxia;
inspired minute ventilation (
I) and
VT increased significantly and end-tidal PCO2
(PETCO2) decreased
significantly by 20-40 s of hypoxic exposure (P < 0.05).
Breathing frequency also tended to increase slightly, particularly
after ~40 s of hypoxic exposure, but did not achieve statistical
significance. Occasional brief episodes of changes in sleep state
occurred in some dogs during these trials; data from these periods were
not used.
|
|
CNS hypoxia.
We use a polygraph record (Fig. 4) and data
from our most severe level of hypoxia
(PaO2 = 37.9 ± 1.2 Torr;
Fig. 2) to illustrate the transition from air breathing to hypoxia. All
dogs responded rapidly to hypoxia;
PETCO2 decreased
significantly by 20-40 s of hypoxic exposure, and breathing
frequency increased significantly by 40-60 s of hypoxic exposure.
Breath-by-breath
I was clearly tending to
increase after 20-40 s of exposure to hypoxia in most dogs but did
not quite achieve statistical significance (P < 0.072).
Unlike the situation in whole body hypoxia, the early increase in
ventilation was mediated exclusively by increased breathing frequency,
inasmuch as there was no significant change or even a discernible trend
in VT for at least the first 2 min of hypoxic exposure in
all dogs. Occasional brief episodes of changes in sleep state occurred
in some dogs during these trials; data from these periods were not
used.
|
Steady-State Responses (5 min)
Whole body hypoxia.
Figure 5 summarizes the minute-by-minute
ventilatory responses to 5 min of whole body hypoxia. Whole body
hypoxia increased ventilation in a graded way as the severity of
hypoxia increased, reaching a steady state by the 2nd min of hypoxic
exposure. This increased
I was due to
increases in breathing frequency and VT and inspiratory
duty cycle (VT/TI) as inspiratory and
expiratory time (TI and TE, respectively)
decreased. The rate of rise of the moving time average of the crural
diaphragm EMG increased in about two-thirds of all trials. The
increased ventilation was a true hyperventilation, inasmuch as
PETCO2 decreased progressively in all dogs as PaO2
decreased.
|
CNS hypoxia.
Figure 5 summarizes the minute-by-minute ventilatory responses to 5 min
of CNS hypoxia. CNS hypoxia increased ventilation in a graded way as
the severity of hypoxia increased, although the magnitude of the
changes was smaller than that observed during whole body hypoxia. The
time course of response was similar, reaching a steady state by the 2nd
min of hypoxic exposure. This increased
I
was attributable entirely to increases in breathing frequency mostly as
a result of decreases in TE and lesser decreases in TI. VT was unchanged or tended to decrease, so
neither VT/TI nor the rate of rise of the
crural diaphragm EMG changed significantly. The increased ventilation
was a true hyperventilation, inasmuch as
PETCO2 decreased
progressively with severity of hypoxia in all dogs.
Prolonged Hypoxia (10-25 min)
Whole body hypoxia.
Four of the seven dogs were exposed to our most severe level of whole
body hypoxia (PaO2 = 37.5 ± 0.8 Torr) for up to 15-25 min. Occasional brief EEG arousals occurred,
but the steady-state data shown in Fig. 6
were obtained in stable non-REM sleep. Arterial PCO2
(PaCO2) tended to reach a plateau or
continued to decrease slightly after 5 min of hypoxia. VT
and breathing frequency were more variable, but the net result was
I that reached a plateau by 5 min of
hypoxic exposure or decreased slightly relative to the 5-min point.
|
CNS hypoxia.
The same four dogs were exposed to our most severe level of whole body
hypoxia (PaO2 = 37.9 ± 1.2 Torr) for
up to 15-25 min while the carotid bodies were maintained normoxic,
normocapnic, and normohydric via perfusion. Occasional brief EEG
arousals occurred, but the steady-state data shown in Fig. 6 were
obtained in stable non-REM sleep. PaCO2
decreased in three of the four dogs and reached plateaus by 5 min of
hypoxic exposure. One dog progressively retained CO2
between 5 and 15 min of hypoxic exposure.
PaCO2 changes were generally reflected
in changes in
I. VT and
breathing frequency were more variable, but increased breathing
frequency was usually the dominant component of the increased
I.
Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Responses to Whole Body and CNS Hypoxia
Whole body hypoxia.
Figure 7 shows minute-by-minute means of
mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate during exposure to our most
severe level of hypoxia (PaO2 = 37.5 ± 0.8 Torr). Mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate increased
progressively up to 4 min of hypoxic exposure.
|
CNS hypoxia. Figure 7 shows minute-by-minute means of mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate during exposure to our most severe level of hypoxia (PaO2 = 37.9 ± 1.2 Torr). The control values were elevated relative to whole body controls. There were no significant changes in mean arterial blood pressure or heart rate in the first 3 min of hypoxic exposure, although there was a slight trend toward increased heart rate.
Hypoxia and Carotid Body Denervation
During non-REM sleep or wakefulness in four unanesthetized, carotid body-denervated dogs, there was no overall ventilatory response (i.e., no change in PaCO2 or
I) to a wide range of hypoxia
(PaO2 = 30-55 Torr; Fig.
8). However, in all four dogs, breathing
frequency increased 2-6 breaths/min and VT decreased 50- 100 ml.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In summary, we have found that 5-25 min of exposure to specific CNS hypoxia (PaO2 = 35-55 Torr) during non-REM sleep in dogs did not depress ventilation; rather, there was significant hyperventilation. The hyperventilation was mediated entirely by increased breathing frequency, unlike the larger hyperventilation observed during whole body hypoxia, which was mediated by increases in breathing frequency and VT. Initiation of the ventilatory response to CNS hypoxia was rapid: the time course was comparable to that observed during whole body hypoxia. Most dogs maintained hyperventilation for up to 15-25 min of CNS hypoxia; only one of the four dogs studied over the longer term manifested hypoxic ventilatory depression. Blood pressure and heart rate did not change significantly in response to CNS hypoxia.
We conclude that specific CNS hypoxia, when the carotid bodies are intact and normoxic and normocapnic, usually stimulates breathing. The rapidity of the response suggests a chemoreflex meditated by hypoxia-sensitive respiratory-related neurons in the CNS.
Limitations of the Study
Adequacy of carotid body isolation. A crucial assumption in our study is that the remaining carotid body is completely isolated from the systemic circulation when it is perfused and, therefore, cannot contribute to the observed responses to arterial hypoxemia. A corollary of this assumption is that the intact aortic bodies (or any other putative peripheral chemosensors) have a negligible effect on ventilation and blood pressure in the range of hypoxia we used. We believe these are reasonable assumptions, because large boluses of intravenous sodium cyanide, known to elicit ventilatory responses much larger than any we observed during CNS hypoxia, failed to produce any ventilatory or blood pressure responses when given while the carotid body was perfused (see METHODS). In addition, carotid body-denervated dogs (with intact aortic chemoreceptors) showed no ventilatory responses to the same doses of sodium cyanide, which would seem to rule out a significant contribution from aortic chemoreceptors. Also, the ventilatory responses observed during CNS hypoxia were qualitatively different from those observed during whole body hypoxia (increased breathing frequency only vs. mostly increased VT), suggesting that different sets of receptors were stimulated.
Is brain blood flow compromised during carotid body perfusion? Our technique requires temporary occlusion of the external carotid artery and ligation of several arterial branches in the carotid sinus region. It is well known that the normal response of brain vasculature to hypoxia is a vasodilatation leading to increased cerebral blood flow, which in turn results in CNS alkalosis and, presumably, reduced stimulation of medullary chemoreceptors. In fact, this is one of the mechanisms proposed to explain ventilatory depression in response to CNS hypoxia (31). We presume that this increased cerebral blood flow also occurred in our studies of CNS hypoxia, at least when PaO2 was <50 Torr, but we cannot be sure that this increase in cerebral blood flow does indeed occur in our preparation with potentially compromised cerebral blood flow. If this mechanism of increased cerebral blood flow/CNS hypocapnia was reduced in our preparation, then the net effect of any direct hypoxic CNS stimulation and inhibition due to hypocapnia would be biased against ventilatory depression. However, the absence of increased cerebral blood flow would not explain the ventilatory stimulation we showed with CNS hypoxia. We do not believe that brain blood flow is compromised in our preparation because of the extensive collateral circulation in the canine brain (12) and the fact that basilar artery flow in the dog has been shown to increase more than threefold with acute occlusion of both common carotid arteries (44). However, there is also evidence to suggest that the external carotid artery carries a significant amount of the total cerebral blood flow, possibly as much as 40% of the amount supplied by the internal carotid artery (23). To our knowledge, the functional significance of ipsilateral occlusion of the internal and external carotids is unknown.
Poikilocapnia. We let PaCO2 change spontaneously with breathing; usually this resulted in hypocapnia. Consequently, we did not examine a pure effect of CNS hypoxia but, rather, the combination of hypoxia and hypocapnia. This implies that we probably underestimated the ventilatory response to CNS hypoxia, and this is supported by contrasting the present findings with the 70% increase in ventilation in the carotid body-perfused awake goat exposed to CNS hypoxia but with systemic isocapnia maintained (11). We used poikilocapnia, because we wished to avoid the problem of even very small errors in PaCO2 while we were attempting to maintain isocapnia, which might have caused central chemoreceptor-induced ventilatory stimulation. This approach also allowed us to determine the precise onset and time course of the ventilatory response from the initiation of systemic hypoxia. Nevertheless, we recognize that our ventilatory responses beyond the first few breaths of hypoxia represent the net effect of hypoxic stimulation and hypocapnic inhibition. It would have been ideal to use isocapnic and hypocapnic CNS hypoxia. However, our preparation had a finite life, permitting only a limited number of trials, so we chose to do repeated poikilocapnic trials across a range of PaO2.
Comparison With Other Models Used to Study Ventilatory Effects of Central Hypoxia
Previous studies have used three basic approaches to address the question of ventilatory responses to CNS hypoxia. Although they were useful, each approach had certain limitations that we hoped to avoid.Anesthetized models. Depressive effects of CNS hypoxia on ventilation are seen consistently in anesthetized preparations, usually with CO-induced hypoxemia and with PaCO2 and blood pressure controlled (27, 28, 32). The major limitation here is that anesthesia obtunds the entire nervous system and therefore responses may not reflect the physiology of the unanesthetized state.
Carotid body-denervated models. Awake, carotid body-denervated dogs, in which denervation was confirmed independently with cyanide injection, show virtually no ventilatory response (i.e., ±1 Torr PETCO2 or PaCO2) to PaO2 between ~25 and 35 Torr (5, 20) (Fig. 8). The use of sodium cyanide to test for peripheral chemosensitivity is important in carotid body denervation studies, because it provides an independent test of peripheral chemosensitivity; denervations can be incomplete, return of peripheral chemosensitivity is possible, and/or other peripheral chemoreceptors (e.g., aortics) could be upregulated over time. In awake rabbits, goats, and ponies, again in which denervation was confirmed independently with cyanide injection, virtually no ventilatory response to acute hypoxia has been observed (5, 13, 45).
All the foregoing denervation studies were done during wakefulness. One might predict that hypoxic ventilatory depression in a carotid body-denervated preparation would be most likely to occur during sleep, when ventilatory drive is low. In the present study, however, we found no ventilatory response (increase or decrease) to hypoxia during non-REM sleep in the unanesthetized, carotid body-denervated dog. It is noteworthy, however, that ventilatory pattern changes still occurred (see RESULTS). These findings are consistent with those of Bowes et al. (6), who showed no discernible change in ventilation when carotid body-denervated, sleeping dogs were exposed to hypoxia. Carotid body denervation models also have limitations. Chiefly, these are the loss of tonic chemoreceptor afferent input to the respiratory controller and the potential for central remodeling when carotid sinus afferents are destroyed (39). It would clearly be desirable to keep the carotid bodies intact but isolated from the systemic circulation.Intact but vascularly isolated and perfused carotid bodies. Intact, awake goats with extracorporeal perfusion of the vascularly isolated carotid body, in which brain and carotid body O2, CO2, and pH were controlled independently, manifested clear hyperpnea when the systemic circulation (including the brain) was made hypoxic (isocapnia maintained) and the carotid body was maintained normoxic and normocapnic (11). Not only was there a hyperpnea, but there was no effect of CNS hypoxia on the ventilatory manifestation of short-term potentiation after abrupt removal of hypoxic carotid chemoreceptor stimulation, an effect that had been thought to be quite labile to CNS hypoxia (2, 14). Despite the fact that the foregoing study was done during wakefulness and isocapnia, the results of the present study are consistent with this idea, i.e., that CNS hypoxia in unanesthetized, carotid body-intact animals generally causes ventilatory stimulation rather than depression.
In summary, we believe there are three major advantages of our preparation compared with other preparations reported in the literature. The first advantage is lack of anesthesia. Anesthetized preparations consistently depress ventilation in response to CNS hypoxia; unanesthetized preparations do not. Another advantage is intact carotid bodies. Preparations with one intact carotid body maintain some low level of tonic chemoreceptor input to the respiratory controller, and the intact connections appear to prevent central remodeling that may occur in response to denervation. Finally, we believe that sleep is an advantage, in that non-REM sleep eliminates behavioral responses unrelated to the ventilatory effects of CNS hypoxia. Furthermore, given the marked qualitative differences in the response to CNS hypoxia between sleep and anesthesia, it is clear that extrapolations from the anesthetized to the unanesthetized but sleeping animal are unwarranted.CNS Hypoxia: Implications for Respiratory and Cardiovascular Control in Sleep and in Sustained Hypoxia
Non-REM sleep is a physiological state in which baseline respiratory motor output is reduced, as are the ventilatory responses to hypoxia and hypercapnia. Furthermore, ventilatory depression and even apnea can occur in non-REM sleep with even very small decreases in PaCO2 (40). It has also been suggested that the periodic breathing during sleep in hypoxia might be attributed in part to the depressive effects of CNS hypoxia, especially on the ventilatory manifestation of short-term potentiation (2, 14), a known stabilizer of breathing. Our data do not confirm this concept, because ventilation increased with CNS hypoxia, and this increase was sustained for many minutes, even in the presence of mild systemic hypocapnia during non-REM sleep. Rather, as in the awake, carotid body-perfused goat (11), our data would suggest that CNS and carotid body hypoxic stimulation contribute to the elevated ventilation normally attending hypoxia during sleep (or wakefulness). Our studies were not sufficiently comprehensive to permit a quantitative comparison of CNS hypoxia effects between wakefulness and sleep.The mechanisms mediating the increased blood pressure and heart rate observed in response to hypoxia in the intact animal are complex (7). The pressor response is attributed to increased sympathetic vasoconstrictor effects, which in turn are known to be mediated by carotid body stimulation (7) and by CNS hypoxia (49). In CNS hypoxia in our sleeping dogs, we observed a slight tendency for blood pressure and heart rate to increase, but this response was highly variable. We found this surprising in view of the clear sympathetic excitation elicited by brain hypoxia in the anesthetized rat (48). It is also important to emphasize that we observed no tendency toward depression of blood pressure and heart rate with CNS hypoxia. We did not measure blood flow or vascular resistance, and these would be important to know to demonstrate whether our unanesthetized, intact preparation showed a sympathetically mediated vasoconstriction similar to that seen with CNS hypoxia in anesthetized rats (42).
A time-dependent ventilatory response to hypoxia has been described whereby the response peaks in the first few minutes and then gradually declines toward control values (24). Furthermore, the ventilatory response to acute hypoxia does not return for a substantial time period after the sustained hypoxic exposure (24). An effect of sustained hypoxia causing CNS depression of ventilation has been proposed to explain this hypoxic ventilatory decline ("roll-off") (31). However, our data in CNS hypoxia sustained for up to 25 min showed a persistent hyperventilatory response in three of the four dogs tested, even in the face of a reduction in PaCO2 (Fig. 6). These data in sleep confirm the persistent hyperventilation seen over several minutes of sustained CNS hypoxia in the awake goat with intact perfused carotid bodies that were maintained normoxic and normocapnic (11, 46). Accordingly, we favor the explanation that the source of hypoxic ventilatory decline in prolonged hypoxia may be the time-dependent central inhibitory effects of sustained carotid sinus nerve stimulation rather than CNS hypoxic depression of ventilation per se (3). Indirect evidence in support of this claim is the absence of any time-dependent hypoxic ventilatory decline in carotid body-denervated animals (25) and the increased release of dopamine in the nucleus tractus solitarius with sustained stimulation of carotid sinus nerve afferents (15). However, a ventilatory depression was observed during long-term hypoxic exposure in one dog in the present study. An effect of the duration of CNS hypoxic exposure and/or a threshold for CNS hypoxic depression (which might vary between individuals and species) cannot be excluded.
Mechanism of Ventilatory Stimulation by CNS Hypoxia
Hypoxia-sensitive CNS neurons require tonic carotid body afferent input. The hyperventilation observed in response to CNS hypoxia in this study and the rapid time course of response suggest a central O2-sensitive chemosensor-like mechanism. Because the carotid bodies cannot be directly involved, this must mean that CNS neurons were responding to the hypoxia to mediate the ventilatory and cardiovascular responses. Given the different responses to CNS hypoxia between intact and carotid body-denervated animals, we speculate that tonic, low-level carotid body afferent input to the CNS is required for the CNS-mediated hyperventilatory response to hypoxia. One approach to test this hypothesis would be to assess central hypoxic responses while carotid chemoreceptor output was minimized with a hyperoxic local perfusion.
A role for sympathetic efferents? In our experimental model with an intact carotid body, it is important to note that sympathetic efferent activity stimulated by CNS hypoxia (48) could potentially modulate carotid body sensitivity by altering blood flow through the carotid body or by direct effects on the carotid chemoreceptor type I cells. This might explain an increase in ventilation, even in the face of a carotid body maintained normoxic and normocapnic via perfusion. However, the role of carotid sinus nerve sympathetic efferents, if any, is controversial. Electrical stimulation of sympathetic fibers inhibits (36) or augments (30, 36) carotid body output. Some found an augmentation of the carotid body hypoxic response when sympathetics to the carotid body were cut (16, 21, 41), whereas others found no significant effect on the ventilatory responses to acute or chronic hypoxia in awake (43) and anesthetized (9, 26) preparations. Furthermore, we observed that CNS hypoxia caused hyperventilation exclusively by increased breathing frequency, whereas hypoxic carotid body stimulation increased VT and breathing frequency (11, 46). Regardless of whether sympathetics have a role in the response to specific CNS hypoxia, it seems clear to us that the hypoxia is sensed initially by the CNS.
A role for CNS lactacidosis? Another possible mechanism of the ventilatory response to CNS hypoxia is the elaboration of lactic acid by the brain. It is known that acidification occurs on the medullary surface when systemic hypoxia is induced (18, 32). Arguing against this mechanism is the fact that brain lactacidosis would presumably also occur in the carotid body-denervated preparation, yet no hyperventilatory response was observed under these conditions. Also, the time course of acidification does not correlate with the ventilatory measurements observed in the present study; medullary surface acidification required 1.5-2 min for the initial response, whereas ventilation in the present study began to change within 20 s of hypoxic exposure (32, 52).
It is also not clear whether CNS lactacidosis is in fact a ventilatory stimulant. Systemic pretreatment with dichloroacetate (DCA), a blocker of lactic acid production, enhanced the acute hyperventilatory response to hypoxia (1) in awake goats. Similar findings were obtained in the anesthetized cat (33); systemic DCA treatment prevented the hypoxia-mediated fall in medullary surface pH, yet phrenic activity was maintained until extremely low arterial O2 contents were reached. However, when applied topically to the surface of the ventrolateral medulla in anesthetized cats, DCA again prevented the hypoxia-mediated fall in medullary surface pH, but the time course and magnitude of the decrease in phrenic activity were essentially identical to the pretreatment response (33). Taken together, these data suggest that hypoxia-induced CNS lactacidosis is depressant to ventilation or has no role in ventilatory control.A role for higher centers?
The fact that the hyperventilatory response to CNS hypoxia in our
animals consisted of an increase in breathing frequency with maintained
VT might implicate an indirect role for supramedullary structures, as proposed some time ago by Tenney and colleagues (29, 38,
50). These authors also observed a tachypneic response to various
levels of hypoxia in awake carotid body-denervated cats; however,
unlike the hyperventilatory response in our carotid body-intact dogs,
they showed a reduced VT and
I with CO2
retention. Their subsequent studies in decerebrate and decorticate
animals led them to postulate that this tachypneic response was due to CNS hypoxic depression of cortical structures, which in turn would remove the inhibitory influence normally exerted by the cortex on
"rate-facilitating" neurons in the diencephalon, thereby
facilitating the hypoxia-induced increase in breathing frequency. This
mechanism might be especially important in non-REM sleep, during which
higher CNS structures may be more susceptible to depression by hypoxia.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
The technical assistance of Maria Zayas and Andrew Neeb is gratefully acknowledged.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This work was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grants HL-50531 and HL-07654.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: C. A. Smith, 504 N. Walnut St., Madison, WI 53705-2368 (E-mail: casmith4{at}facstaff.wisc.edu).
Received 7 June 1999; accepted in final form 11 December 1999.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Aaron, EA,
Forster HV,
Lowry TF,
Korducki MJ,
and
Ohtake PJ.
Effect of dichloroacetate on PaCO2 responses to hypoxia in awake goats.
J Appl Physiol
80:
176-181,
1996
2.
Badr, MS,
Skatrud JB,
and
Dempsey JA.
Determinants of poststimulus potentiation in humans during NREM sleep.
J Appl Physiol
73:
1958-1971,
1992
3.
Bisgard, GE,
and
Neubauer JA.
Peripheral and central effects of hypoxia.
In: Regulation of Breathing (2nd ed.), edited by Dempsey JA,
and Pack AI.. New York: Dekker, 1994, p. 617-668.
4.
Bouverot, P,
and
Bureau M.
Ventilatory acclimatization and CSF acid-base balance in carotid chemodenervated dogs at 3,550 m.
Pflügers Arch
361:
17-23,
1975[ISI][Medline].
5.
Bouverot, P,
Candas V,
and
Libert JP.
Role of the arterial chemoreceptors in ventilatory adaptation to hypoxia of awake dogs and rabbits.
Respir Physiol
17:
209-219,
1973[ISI][Medline].
6.
Bowes, G,
Townsend ER,
Kozar LF,
Bromley SM,
and
Phillipson EA.
Effect of carotid body denervation on arousal response to hypoxia in sleeping dogs.
J Appl Physiol
51:
40-45,
1981
7.
Daly, M,
and
de Burgh
Interactions between respiration and circulation.
In: Handbook of Physiology. The Respiratory System. Control of Breathing. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc, 1986, sect. 3, vol. II, pt. 2, chapt. 16, p. 529-594.
8.
Davenport, HW,
Brewer G,
Chambers AH,
and
Goldschmidt S.
The respiratory responses to anoxemia of unanesthetized dogs with chronically denervated aortic and carotid chemoreceptors and their causes.
Am J Physiol
148:
406-416,
1947.
9.
Davies, RO,
Nishino T,
and
Lahiri S.
Sympathectomy does not alter the response of carotid chemoreceptors to hypoxemia during carboxyhemoglobinemia or anemia.
Neurosci Lett
21:
159-164,
1981[ISI][Medline].
10.
Dillon, GH,
and
Waldrop TG.
In vitro responses of caudal hypothalamic neurons to hypoxia and hypercapnia.
Neuroscience
51:
941-950,
1992[ISI][Medline].
11.
Engwall, MJA,
Smith CA,
Dempsey JA,
and
Bisgard GE.
Ventilatory afterdischarge and central respiratory drive interactions in the awake goat.
J Appl Physiol
76:
416-423,
1994
12.
Evans, HE.
Miller's Anatomy of the Dog. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1993.
13.
Forster, HV,
Bisgard GE,
Rasmussen B,
Orr JA,
Buss DD,
and
Manohar M.
Ventilatory control in peripheral chemoreceptor-denervated ponies during chronic hypoxemia.
J Appl Physiol
41:
878-885,
1976
14.
Georgopoulos, D,
Bshouty Z,
Younes M,
and
Anthonisen NR.
Hypoxic exposure and activation of the afterdischarge mechanism in conscious humans.
J Appl Physiol
69:
1159-1164,
1990
15.
Goiny, M,
Lagercrantz H,
Srinivasan M,
Ungerstedt U,
and
Yamamoto H.
Hypoxia-mediated in vivo release of dopamine in nucleus tractus solitarii of rabbits.
J Appl Physiol
70:
2395-2400,
1991
16.
Hatcher, JD,
Chiu LK,
and
Jennings DB.
Anaemia as a stimulus to aortic and carotid chemoreceptors in the cat.
J Appl Physiol
44:
696-702,
1978
17.
Horn, EM,
and
Waldrop TG.
Oxygen-sensing neurons in the caudal hypothalamus and their role in cardiorespiratory control.
Respir Physiol
110:
219-228,
1997[ISI][Medline].
18.
Javaheri, S,
and
Teppema LJ.
Ventral medullary extracellular fluid pH and PCO2 during hypoxemia.
J Appl Physiol
63:
1567-1571,
1987
19.
Jiang, C,
and
Haddad GG.
A direct mechanism for sensing low oxygen levels by central neurons.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
91:
7198-7201,
1994
20.
Krasney, JA,
Magno MG,
Levitzky MG,
Koehler RC,
and
Davies DG.
Cardiovascular responses to arterial hypoxia in awake sinoaortic-denervated dogs.
J Appl Physiol
35:
733-738,
1973
21.
Lahiri, S.
Efferent inhibition of carotid body chemoreception in chronically hypoxic cats.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
245:
R678-R683,
1983
22.
Lahiri, S,
Edelman NH,
Cherniack NS,
and
Fishman AP.
Role of carotid chemoreflex in respiratory acclimatization to hypoxemia in goat and sheep.
Respir Physiol
46:
367-382,
1981[ISI][Medline].
23.
Lee, MC,
Reid IA,
and
Ramsay DJ.
Blood flows in the maxillocarotid anastomoses and internal carotid artery of conscious dogs.
Anat Rec
215:
192-197,
1986[Medline].
24.
Long, W,
Lobchuk D,
and
Anthonisen NR.
Ventilatory responses to CO2 and hypoxia after sustained hypoxia in awake cats.
J Appl Physiol
76:
2262-2266,
1994
25.
Long, WQ,
Giesbrecht GG,
and
Anthonisen NR.
Ventilatory response to moderate hypoxia in awake chemodenervated cats.
J Appl Physiol
74:
805-810,
1993
26.
McQueen, DS,
Evrard Y,
Gordon BH,
and
Campbell DB.
Ganglioglomerular nerves influence responsiveness of cat carotid chemoreceptors to almitrine.
J Auton Nerv Syst
27:
57-66,
1989[ISI][Medline].
27.
Melton, JE,
Neubauer JA,
and
Edelman NH.
CO2 sensitivity of cat phrenic neurogram during hypoxic respiratory depression.
J Appl Physiol
65:
736-743,
1988
28.
Melton, JE,
Yu QP,
Neubauer JA,
and
Edelman NH.
Modulation of respiratory responses to carotid sinus nerve stimulation by brain hypoxia.
J Appl Physiol
73:
2166-2171,
1992
29.
Miller, MJ,
and
Tenney SM.
Hypoxia-induced tachypnea in carotid-deafferented cats.
Respir Physiol
23:
31-39,
1975[ISI][Medline].
30.
Mitchell, RA,
and
McCloskey DI.
Chemoreceptor responses to sympathetic stimulation and changes in blood pressure.
Respir Physiol
20:
297-302,
1974[ISI][Medline].
31.
Neubauer, JA,
Melton JE,
and
Edelman NH.
Modulation of respiration during brain hypoxia.
J Appl Physiol
68:
441-451,
1990
32.
Neubauer, JA,
Santiago TV,
Posner MA,
and
Edelman NH.
Ventral medullary pH and ventilatory responses to hyperperfusion and hypoxia.
J Appl Physiol
58:
1659-1968,
1985
33.
Neubauer, JA,
Simone A,
and
Edelman NH.
Role of brain lactic acidosis in hypoxic depression of respiration.
J Appl Physiol
65:
1324-3131,
1988
34.
Nolan, PC,
Dillon GH,
and
Waldrop TG.
Central hypoxic chemoreceptors in the ventrolateral medulla and caudal hypothalamus.
Adv Exp Med Biol
393:
261-266,
1995[Medline].
35.
Olson, EB, Jr,
Vidruk EH,
and
Dempsey JA.
Carotid body excision significantly changes ventilatory control in awake rats.
J Appl Physiol
64:
666-671,
1988
36.
O'Regan, RG.
Responses of carotid body chemosensory activity and blood flow to stimulation of sympathetic nerves in the cat.
J Physiol (Lond)
315:
81-98,
1981
37.
Orem, J,
Netick A,
and
Dement WC.
Breathing during sleep and wakefulness in the cat.
Respir Physiol
30:
265-289,
1977[ISI][Medline].
38.
Ou, LC,
St. John WM,
and
Tenney SM.
The contribution of central mechanisms rostral to the pons in high-altitude ventilatory acclimatization.
Respir Physiol
54:
343-351,
1983[ISI][Medline].
39.
Pan, LG,
Forster HV,
Martino P,
Strecker PJ,
Beales J,
Serra A,
Lowry TF,
Forster MM,
and
Forster AL.
Important role of carotid afferents in control of breathing.
J Appl Physiol
85:
1299-1306,
1998
40.
Phillipson, EA,
and
Bowes G.
Control of breathing during sleep.
In: Handbook of Physiology. The Respiratory System. Control of Breathing. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc, 1986, sect. 3, vol. II, pt. 2, chapt. 19, p. 649-689.
41.
Prabhakar, NR,
and
Kou YR.
Inhibitory sympathetic action on the carotid body responses to sustained hypoxia.
Respir Physiol
95:
67-79,
1994[ISI][Medline].
42.
Reis, DJ,
Golanov EV,
Ruggiero DA,
and
Sun MK.
Sympatho-excitatory neurons of the rostral ventrolateral medulla are oxygen sensors and essential elements in the tonic and reflex control of the systemic and cerebral circulations.
J Hypertens Suppl
12:
S159-S180,
1994[Medline].
43.
Ryan, ML,
Bisgard GE,
Pizarro J,
and
Hedrick MS.
Effects of carotid body sympathetic denervation on ventilatory acclimatization to hypoxia in the goat.
Respir Physiol
99:
215-224,
1995[ISI][Medline].
44.
Shima, T,
Ishikawa S,
Sasaki U,
Miyazaki M,
and
Hibino H.
Quantitative measurement of the basilar arterial flow in the dog
electromagnetic flowmeter study of the extra- and intracranial arterial occlusion.
No Shinkei Geka
4:
451-457,
1976[Medline].
45.
Smith, CA,
Bisgard GE,
Nielsen AM,
Daristotle L,
Kressin NA,
Forster HV,
and
Dempsey JA.
Carotid bodies are required for ventilatory acclimatization to chronic hypoxia.
J Appl Physiol
60:
1003-1010,
1986
46.
Smith, CA,
Engwall MJA,
Dempsey JA,
and
Bisgard GE.
Effects of specific carotid body and brain hypoxia on respiratory muscle control in the awake goat.
J Physiol (Lond)
460:
623-640,
1993
47.
Smith, CA,
Saupe KW,
Henderson KS,
and
Dempsey JA.
Ventilatory effects of specific carotid body hypocapnia in dogs during wakefulness and sleep.
J Appl Physiol
79:
689-699,
1995
48.
Sun, MK,
and
Reis DJ.
Central neural mechanisms mediating excitation of sympathetic neurons by hypoxia.
Prog Neurobiol
44:
197-219,
1994[ISI][Medline].
49.
Sun, MK,
and
Reis DJ.
Hypoxia selectively excites vasomotor neurons of rostral ventrolateral medulla in rats.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
266:
R245-R256,
1994
50.
Tenney, SM,
and
Ou LC.
Ventilatory response of decorticate and decerebrate cats to hypoxia and CO2.
Respir Physiol
29:
81-92,
1976.
51.
Van Beek, JH,
Berkenbosch A,
de Goede J,
and
Olievier CN.
Effects of brain stem hypoxaemia on the regulation of breathing.
Respir Physiol
57:
171-188,
1984[ISI][Medline].
52.
Xu, F,
Sato M,
Spellman MJ, Jr,
Mitchell RA,
and
Severinghaus JW.
Topography of cat medullary ventral surface hypoxic acidification.
J Appl Physiol
73:
2631-2637,
1992
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. K. Stickland, B. J. Morgan, and J. A. Dempsey Carotid chemoreceptor modulation of sympathetic vasoconstrictor outflow during exercise in healthy humans J. Physiol., March 15, 2008; 586(6): 1743 - 1754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Smith, B. J. Chenuel, K. S. Henderson, and J. A. Dempsey The apneic threshold during non-REM sleep in dogs: sensitivity of carotid body vs. central chemoreceptors J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2007; 103(2): 578 - 586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Smith, J. R. Rodman, B. J. A. Chenuel, K. S. Henderson, and J. A. Dempsey Response time and sensitivity of the ventilatory response to CO2 in unanesthetized intact dogs: central vs. peripheral chemoreceptors J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2006; 100(1): 13 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Dempsey Crossing the apnoeic threshold: causes and consequences Exp Physiol, January 1, 2005; 90(1): 13 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A Dempsey, C. A Smith, T. Przybylowski, B. Chenuel, A. Xie, H. Nakayama, and J. B Skatrud The ventilatory responsiveness to CO2 below eupnoea as a determinant of ventilatory stability in sleep J. Physiol., October 1, 2004; 560(1): 1 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Nakayama, C. A. Smith, J. R. Rodman, J. B. Skatrud, and J. A. Dempsey Carotid body denervation eliminates apnea in response to transient hypocapnia J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2003; 94(1): 155 - 164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
<