|
|
||||||||
Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, and Department of Neurology, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California 94121
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To test the hypothesis that a lower mean arterial pressure (MAP) response during voluntary isometric exercise in multiple sclerosis (MS) is related to a dampened muscle metabolic signal, 9 MS and 11 control subjects performed an isometric dorsiflexor contraction at 30% maximal voluntary contraction until target failure (endurance time). We made continuous and noninvasive measurements of heart rate and MAP (Finapres) and of intramuscular pH and Pi (phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy) in a subset of 6 MS and 10 control subjects. Endurance times and change in heart rate were similar in MS and control subjects. The decrease in pH and increase in Pi were less throughout exercise in MS compared with control subjects, as was the change in MAP response. Differences in muscle strength accounted for some of the difference in MAP response between groups. Cardiovascular responses during Valsalva and cold pressor tests were similar in MS and control subjects, suggesting that the blunted MAP response during exercise in MS was not due to a generalized dysautonomia. The dampened metabolic response in MS subjects was not explained by inadequate central muscle activation. These data suggest that the blunted pressor response to exercise in MS subjects may be largely appropriate to a blunted muscle metabolic response and differences in contracting muscle mass.
dysautonomia; muscle activation; muscle strength; fatigue; cardiovascular autonomic regulation
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS (MS) is a demyelinating disease of the central nervous system that can result in white matter lesions or plaques. Damage to the myelin sheath can lead to slowed or blocked motor nerve conduction, which may result in ataxia, spasticity, muscle weakness, and fatigue. MS can be of a relapsing-remitting or progressive nature and is highly variable among individuals. The autonomic nervous system can also be affected, and clinically significant disturbances in bowel, bladder, and sexual function are well documented (30). Although abnormalities in one or more cardiovascular reflexes (2, 8, 10, 12, 37, 40, 45, 50, 51), including a blunted exercise blood pressure (BP) response (10, 37, 40, 50, 51), have been reported in persons with MS, the significance of these findings are not clear (2, 12, 37, 51). A recent study by Pepin et al. (40) demonstrated a dampened arterial blood pressure, or pressor, response to sustained isometric handgrip exercise to exhaustion in MS compared with control subjects. Endurance time was also decreased in the MS group. Interestingly, the heart rate (HR) response to exercise was similar in the MS and control groups. These investigators (40) and others (10) have suggested that an impaired autonomically mediated pressor response may contribute to exercise intolerance and fatigue in MS.
Regulation of the exercise pressor response is both centrally and peripherally mediated (33). The central component, known as central command, is thought to be an activation of the cardiovascular centers in the brain stem, in parallel with motor unit activation, and primarily affects the increase in HR during isometric exercise (16, 28, 29, 53). The primary peripheral component is a chemo- or metaboreflex originating in the active muscle (1, 29, 31, 53). The stimuli for this reflex are the muscle metabolites produced during exercise (e.g., proton, Pi), which activate afferent type III and IV nerve fibers (7, 18, 48, 52). These afferents, in turn, feed back to the central cardiovascular centers, which results primarily in an efferent, sympathetically mediated vasoconstrictor response (29, 53). Thus a blunted pressor response could result not only from an impaired efferent autonomic response but also from a blunted afferent stimulus.
We have previously observed a reduced muscle metabolic response to voluntary exercise in persons with MS, possibly due to intramuscular activation failure (22). Specifically, the changes in intramuscular pH and the ratio of Pi to phosphocreatine (PCr) (Pi/PCr) were less in MS compared with control subjects during graded intermittent isometric exercise (22). These findings raised the possibility that the attenuated exercise pressor response previously observed in persons with MS need not be the result of a cardiovascular autonomic impairment. In fact, a smaller than expected pressor response in persons with MS may represent an appropriate pressor response to a blunted muscle metabolite production during exercise. The distinction between whether a blunted pressor response in persons with MS is the result of a cardiovascular autonomic impairment or the result of altered muscle function may have important clinical implications.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether a blunted exercise pressor response in MS was primarily the result of an autonomic impairment or whether it was associated with and appropriate to a blunted muscle metabolic response. We tested the following hypothesis: during isometric exercise, persons with MS compared with control subjects will show a blunted BP response, a normal HR response, and a blunted muscle metabolic response. Testing consisted of sustained voluntary isometric ankle dorsiflexion, during which beat-to-beat arterial BP and HR were measured simultaneously, along with intramuscular Pi and pH.
To determine whether any observed differences in autonomic function were generalized or exercise specific, we also examined the BP and HR responses to a Valsalva maneuver and a cold pressor test, two nonexercise pressor stimuli. To determine whether a blunted muscle metabolic response was the result of impaired muscle activation, we assessed voluntary muscle activation by using electromyography (EMG) and electrical stimulation techniques (21, 22, 36). Finally, we examined the relationship between symptomatic fatigue and cardiovascular autonomic function, because such a relationship has been implicated in other chronic diseases in which symptomatic fatigue is a major complaint (6, 15).
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects.
The MS group consisted of five women and four men with definite MS
(41), who were recruited from the surrounding community (Table
1). These persons were selected to be
nonsmokers and had no other major disease (e.g., cardiovascular,
metabolic). Health status was based on a standardized health
questionnaire and complete clinical neurological examination by a
neurologist. One woman was taking thyroid medication, and one woman was
taking Elavil, an antidepressant. No other medications were used at the
time of this study. All MS subjects were ambulatory, either without assistance or with a cane. Clinical measures included the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) and Ashworth spasticity score (3). Briefly, the EDSS is a clinical scale of disability from 1 to 10, where
increasing numbers represent increasing disability (27). The Ashworth
scale is a measure of spasticity from 1 to 5, where increasing numbers
represent increasing spasticity. To further characterize the
volunteers, foot tap speed (number in 10 s), manually assessed muscle
strength (32), and Fatigue Severity Scale (26) score for all MS and
control subjects were obtained. A slowing of the rate of foot taps is
an indication of upper motoneuron dysfunction (23). Manually assessed
muscle strength is a subjective score from 0 to 5, where 5 is normal
strength and 0 is no detectable strength (32). The Fatigue Severity
Scale measures subjective symptomatic fatigue on a scale of 1-7,
where an increasing score represents increased subjective fatigue (26).
|
Cardiovascular measurements. An automated beat-by-beat Finapres (Ohmeda, Louisville, CO) BP monitor was used to measure HR and BP (17). Finapres measurements were obtained from the right middle finger with the arm and hand outstretched and supported at heart level. For comparison, arterial BPs during an initial rest period of 5 min in a quiet room were also obtained by manual sphygmomanometry. Finapres data were recorded continuously on a polygraph recorder (model 79D, Grass, Quincy, MA) and analyzed manually. Analyses were based on mean arterial pressures (MAP). During exercise, chest wall excursions were indicated by a mercury-in-Silastic strain gauge taped to the chest wall and recorded by using a chart recorder. Blood flow occlusion was achieved automatically by rapid inflation of a large blood pressure cuff, placed just above the knee, to 25 mmHg above systolic pressure.
Valsalva maneuver. A resting baseline Finapres measurement of MAP and HR was obtained for 5 min before testing. The Valsalva maneuver consisted of blowing through a small mouthpiece, to a pressure of 40 mmHg, for 15 s. Before and during the test, a small leak was maintained in the system with a hypodermic needle to ensure an open glottis. The pressor response to the Valsalva maneuver is baroreflex mediated. The peak rise in MAP during phase IV of the Valsalva maneuver was obtained as an indication of vasomotor sympathetic function (43). The ratio of the maximal HR generated during phase II divided by the minimal HR occurring during phase IV was determined as an indication of cardiac parasympathetic function (43).
Muscle force and activation measurements. After the Valsalva maneuver, the subject was instrumented for the force, activation, and metabolism measurements. These methods have been described in detail previously (19, 22, 36). Exercise testing occurred with the subject seated and one leg extended. The leg was stabilized with a knee brace, and the foot angle was 120° plantar flexion. Dorsiflexor isometric force was measured with a force transducer mounted under a footplate. The transducer signal was amplified and coupled to personal computer. Visual feedback of force during voluntary contractions was provided by a lighted display board placed in front of the subject. Force and EMG data were collected by using Labview software (National Instruments, Austin, TX) and subsequently transferred to a spreadsheet for analysis.
As a measure of muscle activation, the surface EMG was obtained every 15 s during exercise (500 Hz, 1.5-s windows). The EMG was measured by using circular electrodes (10-mm diameter) placed on the tibialis anterior muscle. The active electrode was placed on the belly of the tibialis, the reference electrode was placed on the medial malleolus, and a copper ground plate was placed on the calf. The EMG filter settings were 0.1 Hz and 0.3 kHz. The EMG signal was subsequently rectified, integrated, and expressed relative to the maximal level obtained during the preexercise maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). The EMG was also Fourier transformed by using MATLAB software (MathWorks, Natick, MA), and the median spectral frequency was recorded and expressed relative to that obtained during the first 3 s of exercise. Dorsiflexor muscle MVC was the peak of three trials, each separated by 2 min of rest. Subjects were instructed during each trial to perform a maximal dorsiflexion as hard and fast as possible and were verbally encouraged during each trial. To assess the completeness of voluntary activation during the MVC, a 0.5-s train of 50-Hz supramaximal stimulation of the peroneal nerve, at the fibular head, was superimposed during the third MVC. The central activation ratio was determined as the ratio of the force produced voluntarily (i.e., MVC) to the total force produced (19), where total force was the sum of voluntary force plus any "added force" from the superimposed stimulation [ratio = MVC/(MVC + superimposed force)]. Thus, if activation was complete and there was no superimposed evoked force, then the central activation ratio = 1.0.Muscle metabolic measurements. We obtained magnetic resonance spectroscopy measurements of intramuscular pH and Pi continuously and noninvasively in a subset of 10 control and 6 MS subjects before and during exercise. These methods have been described previously (20, 22). A 2.0-T, 30-cm-bore Oxford Systems superconducting magnet and GE-CSI unit with a Nicolet 1280 computer (Fremont, CA) were used for the collection and processing of the metabolic data. A single-tuned 3- × 5-cm oblong magnetic resonance surface coil was situated over the belly of the tibialis anterior, proximal to the EMG electrode. The leg was placed horizontally into the bore of the magnet, and the magnet was then shimmed to obtain a water peak width at half height of <40 Hz.
A baseline phosphorus spectrum was obtained at rest (4-min average), and spectra consisting of 30-s averages were obtained during exercise and occlusion. The block size was 4,000 for the rest spectra and 2,000 for the exercise and occlusion spectra. For all spectra, the repetition rate was 750 ms, pulse length was 12 µs (nominal angle of 50°), and sweep width was 4,000 Hz. After acquisition, the magnetic resonance data were transferred to a SUN workstation and analyzed by using NMR1 software (New Methods Research, East Syracuse, NY). The peaks corresponding to phosphomonoesters, phosphodiesters, PCr, Pi, and adenosine triphosphate were fit for all spectra. All peaks were fit to avoid inaccurate estimation of peak areas in regions of overlapping peaks (e.g., phosphomonoesters and Pi). Because Pi and pH are considered to be important stimulators of the exercise chemoreflex (7, 48, 52), the data concerning these metabolites are presented. Calculations of pH were based on the chemical shift of Pi from PCr, and Pi was expressed in millimoles per liter. To further characterize muscle energetics we also report Pi/PCr at rest and the end of exercise (9).Isometric endurance test. After the left leg and probe was fitted into the bore of the magnet, and before shimming, MVC and central activation ratio measurements were obtained. All subjects then practiced attaining and maintaining the target force level of 30% MVC for ~5 s. Subjects were familiarized with the inflation cuff with one brief suprasystolic inflation of 10 s.
After these baseline force measurements were obtained, the Finapres cuff was attached to the right middle finger with the arm and hand outstretched at heart level and resting on a padded surface. The Finapres servo unit and hand were fixed to a board in such a way that the distance from the magnet to the servo unit was maximized. The magnet was then shimmed, and resting phosphorus data were acquired with the subject sitting quietly (~15 min). For the endurance test, subjects were instructed to maintain ankle dorsiflexion at a constant 30% MVC until force dropped to below 90% target force (i.e., 27% MVC) for 2 s. This end point was determined by the same investigator for all studies. Subjects received visual feedback from the force monitor, as well as verbal encouragement. BP, HR, and metabolite measurements were obtained continuously during the endurance test. Because Valsalva or other breath-holding respiratory maneuvers can affect cardiovascular measurements independently of exercise (55), chest wall excursions were monitored continuously. To determine whether there were differences in effort sense between control and MS groups, ratings of perceived exertion using the Borg 10-point scale (5) were obtained at 20-s intervals. To further examine the central and peripheral mechanisms of BP regulation, we occluded blood flow at the end of exercise. When the subjects were no longer able to maintain the required force, the thigh cuff was inflated, and the subjects were then told to relax the contraction. The cuff remained inflated for 1.5 min. During this time, BP, HR, and muscle metabolites were measured continuously. A measure of chemoreflex sensitivity was obtained as the ratio of the change in MAP to both Pi and pH during occlusion. To determine whether discomfort or pain could have affected cardiovascular measurements during occlusion, we obtained ratings of perceived pain (24) every 30 s during occlusion. The perceived pain scale (24) was based on a modified Borg rating of perceived exertion scale. Immediately after the cuff was deflated, subjects were instructed to perform a postexercise MVC. For the fatigue analysis, MVC was expressed relative to preexercise values.Cold pressor test. After recovery from the endurance test (~15 min) and with the leg still in the magnet, new baseline BP and HR measurements were obtained for 5 min. The cold pressor test was then performed. This test consisted of immersing the left hand, up to the wrist, in an insulated bucket of ice water (1-3°C) for 2.5 min (24). The pressor response to cold is determined in large part by cutaneous sensation (24). To determine whether there was any difference in cold or pain perception in control and MS subjects during this test, we measured perceived pain (24) every 30 s during the test.
Statistical analyses. For the isometric endurance test, occlusion, cardiovascular, ratings of perceived exertion, and metabolic variables were analyzed with repeated-measures ANOVA. Because of individual variations in endurance time during the isometric exercise, these variables were normalized to 100% endurance time. Regression models were also used to examine relationships between selected variables, and unpaired t-tests were used to test for the equality of slopes between groups. The relationship of the pressor response to strength was also determined by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) because active muscle mass, which is reflected by strength, may affect the magnitude of the pressor response to isometric exercise (34, 44). Because of the "ceiling" of the central activation ratio at 1.0, nonparametric Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon signed-rank test comparisons were used to compare the central activation ratio data between groups, and median (range) data are reported. For all remaining data, pairwise comparisons between groups were performed with unpaired t-tests. Except for central activation ratio and clinical measures, data are presented as means ± SE.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects . Subject characteristics are summarized in Table 1. There were no differences between control and MS subjects in age, height, or weight. The MS group was weaker than the control group, whether measured manually or by force transducer (MVC). The median EDSS for the MS group was 2 (range 1.5-4.5). The median Ashworth spasticity score was 1 (range 1-2). The median fatigue score in MS subjects was 3.9 (range 2.3-7.0); therefore, about one-half of the MS subjects could be characterized as having "severe" fatigue. Greater symptomatic fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale) and slower foot tap speed were observed in MS compared with control subjects. Thus this group of MS subjects was mild to moderately impaired by their disease. Manually derived MAP at rest was similar between control and MS groups, as was rest MAP and HR measured by the Finapres.
Endurance and fatigue . Endurance times at 30% MVC were similar between control and MS groups (control: 305 ± 54, MS: 257 ± 57 s; P = 0.55). After exercise, MVC had decreased significantly from baseline in both groups (P = 0.02), and there was no statistical difference between groups in the degree of muscle fatigue (control: 56 ± 6, MS: 72 ± 9% preexercise MVC; P = 0.15). We were not able to obtain a postexercise MVC from one control subject.
Relative integrated EMG levels at the end of exercise, just before thigh-cuff inflation, were not different between groups (control: 69 ± 9, MS: 58 ± 6% maximum; P = 0.32). There was no difference in median spectral frequency at the initiation of exercise between groups (control: 34 ± 2, MS 40 ± 9 Hz; P = 0.46). However, at end exercise, the median spectral frequency of the EMG had decreased to a significantly lower level in control compared with MS subjects (control: 59 ± 3, MS: 79 ± 7% initial; P < 0.01). The median preexercise central activation ratio was 1.0 for both the control (range 0.96-1.0) and MS groups (range 0.88-1.0). The median postexercise central activation ratio was 1.0 for the control (range 0.56-1.0) and 0.93 for the MS subjects (range 0.78-1.0). There was no difference in central activation between groups either pre- or postexercise or within groups pre- vs. postexercise. These data suggest that there was no difference in the completeness of voluntary activation between groups before or during the exercise.Cardiovascular responses to exercise
. Starting from similar baseline rest values, MAP increased
linearly with exercise time in both groups (Fig
1A; time main effect, P < 0.001). However, despite similar endurance times, the MAP change from
baseline was less in MS compared with control subjects (main effect
P < 0.01, interaction P < 0.01) at all relative exercise intensities except 30 and 70% (P = 0.06). The
difference between groups increased with increasing endurance time (end
exercise, control = 59 ± 7; MS = 32.0 ± 4 mmHg). There was no
indication of breath-holding-type maneuvers in either group.
|
0.2 to 35.1 mmHg. Thus 0 (i.e., no
difference) was included in this interval. These results suggest that a
blunted pressor response may still be likely even after accounting for
differences in strength.
HR also increased linearly from similar rest values in both groups
(P < 0.01, Fig. 1B). However, unlike the MAP
response, there were no significant differences between control and MS
groups in the magnitude of the HR response.
Ratings of perceived exertion increased in a linear fashion in both
groups during exercise, and there were no differences between groups at
any relative endurance time (Fig. 1C).
The MAP and HR responses to the isometric exercise of the subset of
subjects studied with magnetic resonance spectroscopy (10 control, 6 MS) were similar to those of the entire group. That is, the pressor
response was blunted in the MS group (main effect, P = 0.01),
and there was no difference in the HR response (main effect, P = 0.25; data not shown).
During occlusion, MAP decreased significantly (P < 0.001)
from end-exercise levels to a stable level in both control and MS groups (Fig. 2A). Compared with
control, MAP was less in MS subjects at the beginning and throughout
the occlusion period (main effect, P = 0.003). This difference
matched the difference in MAP during exercise. The interaction term was
not significant (P = 0.88). Thus, although starting from
different end-exercise levels, the MAP response was similar in both
groups during occlusion.
|
Metabolic responses to exercise.
Because of the individual variation in endurance times, common
metabolite measures for all subjects were obtained at 33, 66, and 100%
of endurance time (Fig. 3). Before
exercise, Pi and pH were similar in control and MS groups.
The Pi/PCr was also similar in control and MS groups
(control: 0.11 ± 0.01, MS: 0.13 ± 0.02; P = 0.29).
During exercise, the increase in Pi was less in MS compared with control subjects at all relative endurance times (main
effect, P < 0.01; interaction, P < 0.01, Fig. 3).
Similarly, the decrease in pH was less in the MS groups compared with
control at 66 and 100% endurance time. At the end of exercise,
Pi/PCr tended to be higher in control compared with MS
subjects (control: 3.40 ± 0.70, MS: 1.05 ± 0.91, P = 0.06).
Together, the smaller changes in Pi, pH, and
Pi/PCr show that the muscle metabolic response was dampened
in response to isometric exercise in the MS group.
|
Relationships between BP and metabolites.
Individual slopes and correlations for the MAP and metabolite
regressions are presented in Table 2 and
illustrated in Fig. 4. The
slopes were steeper in control compared with MS both for MAP vs.
Pi and for MAP vs. pH. Furthermore, as indicated by the correlation coefficients, the strengths of the MAP and metabolite relationships were stronger in control than MS.
|
|
Nonexercise pressor responses . Before the Valsalva maneuver, there was no difference between groups in rest MAP (control: 93 ± 3, MS: 97 ± 5 mmHg; P = 0.53). The peak increase in MAP from rest during phase IV of the Valsalva maneuver was similar in control (24 ± 3.8 mmHg) and MS (28 ± 6.6 mmHg; P = 0.59) groups. Similarly, there was no difference in resting HR (control: 73 ± 2, MS: 73 ± 4 beats/min; P = 1.00) or in the ratio of maximal HR during phase II to minimal HR during phase IV of the Valsalva maneuver (control: 1.56 ± 0.07, MS: 1.68 ± 0.12; P = 0.38). These data suggest a normal sympathetic and parasympathetic cardiovascular autonomic response in the MS group to the Valsalva maneuver, a nonexercise pressor stimulus.
Cold pressor test . These results are based on 11 control and 8 MS subjects because of excessive discomfort in 1 MS volunteer. MAP was the same in both groups during rest (control: 96 ± 3, MS: 96 ± 3 mmHg; P = 1.00). The peak increase in MAP from rest was also similar for each group (control: 27 ± 4, MS: 25 ± 4 mmHg; P = 0.74). There was no difference between groups in resting HR (control: 72 ± 3, MS: 70 ± 4 beats/min; P = 0.69) or in the peak change in HR from rest levels (control: 12 ± 3, MS: 12 ± 4 beats/min; P = 1.00). During the cold pressor test, maximal perceived pain was the same in both groups (control: 7 ± 1, MS: 7 ± 1; P = 1.00), indicating that the cold pressor test was perceived in a similar fashion by each group. These results provide further support that the autonomic cardiovascular responses to the cold pressor test, another nonexercise pressor stimulus, were intact in this MS group.
Symptomatic fatigue and autonomic function in MS
. Because the slopes of MAP and metabolites were different
between MS and control subjects, we sought to explore the
relationship between symptomatic fatigue and altered BP regulation in
the MS group. We considered the individual correlation coefficients
(n = 6) of MAP and Pi, and of MAP and pH, to be
indexes of the degree to which the chemoreflex was intact in this
group, where poor correlations between MAP and metabolites indicated a
poor chemoreflex. On the basis of their fatigue scores, the MS subjects
fell into two groups: those with high levels of symptomatic fatigue and those with low (normal) levels (high = 6.5 ± 0.4, low = 3.1 ± 0.4 units; P < 0.01). The average MAP and pH correlation
coefficients were also different between these groups (high:
0.31 ± 0.06, low:
0.61 ± 0.04; P = 0.01). There was no difference between groups in the MAP and
Pi correlation coefficients (high = 0.41 ± 0.1, low = 73 ± 0.1; P = 0.21). Thus those MS subjects who showed the
weakest relationship between MAP and pH also reported the greatest
symptomatic fatigue.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
By simultaneously measuring the cardiovascular and muscle metabolic responses to sustained submaximal isometric exercise, we have shown that both the exercise pressor response and the muscle metabolic response are blunted in MS compared with control subjects. These results support the hypothesis that the blunted exercise pressor response in MS may be appropriate to a decreased muscle metabolite and not necessarily arise from a generalized cardiovascular dysautonomia in MS.
Cardiovascular regulation. Previous studies have demonstrated that the exercise pressor response, as well as other cardiovascular autonomic reflex responses, can be diminished in MS (10, 37, 40, 50, 51). In these studies, the blunted exercise pressor response was taken as evidence of a cardiovascular autonomic impairment. However, most prior exercise studies did not account for differences in strength, endurance time, or exercise intensity between MS and control groups. In one exception, Pepin et al. (40) recently showed that the blunted pressor response was coincident with a decreased exercise endurance time during isometric handgrip contractions sustained to the endurance limit at 30% MVC. On the basis of these and other results (10), it was suggested that an autonomic impairment may limit exercise capacity in persons with MS (10, 40).
Our observation of a blunted exercise pressor response in a group of mild to moderately impaired persons with MS is consistent with earlier studies (10, 37, 40, 50, 51) and suggests that this response is a characteristic finding in MS. However, unlike in the study of Pepin et al. (40), endurance times were similar in our MS and control groups, which implies that the blunted pressor response did not limit isometric endurance in the MS group studied. Our observation of normal MAP and HR responses to the Valsalva maneuver and the cold pressor test suggest that any autonomic impairment was not of a general nature but was specific to exercise. Our observation of a normal HR response to isometric exercise in MS is also consistent with the findings of Pepin et al. (40). Whereas the exercise pressor response is, in large part, a function of the peripheral chemoreflex (29, 53), the HR response to voluntary isometric exercise is, primarily, a function of central command (1, 29, 53). Thus the finding of similar HR responses between groups suggests that the central command pathways were intact in the MS group we studied. A similar HR response in MS and control subjects further argues against a generalized central autonomic impairment in the MS group and implicates the chemoreflex pathway in the blunted exercise pressor response we observed. Caution must be applied to this interpretation of central command because there is some evidence that HR may also be under chemoreflex control (38). Thus we cannot completely exclude the possibility that HR during voluntary exercise was partially under chemoreflex control. During postexercise occlusion of blood flow, the central command component of the pressor response is removed, resulting in a rapid recovery of HR and a partial recovery of MAP (Fig. 2). Occlusion prevents washout of metabolites and therefore maintains the chemoreflex component of the pressor response, resulting in a sympathetically mediated elevation of MAP (1, 29, 52). Thus the use of postexercise blood flow occlusion can help dissociate central command from the peripheral chemoreflex, which allows the chemoreflex to be studied in isolation. Occlusion was confirmed in the present study by the unchanged Pi and pH during cuff inflation. Although the behavior of MAP and HR was similar between groups during occlusion, we had expected HR to return more closely to baseline levels in both groups (29). The slightly elevated HRs in both groups during occlusion may have been explained by the discomfort of the procedure, because perceived pain was 4-5 for both MS and control.Influence of muscle mass or strength . Active muscle mass can influence the magnitude of the pressor response (34, 44) during isometric exercise. The mechanisms for an increased pressor response with a larger muscle mass have been hypothesized to be the result of an increased number of chemosensitive neural afferents activated or the recruitment of more or larger motor units via central command (44). Relative force is not thought to be related to the magnitude of the exercise pressor response (35). However, because maximal force or strength is proportional to muscle mass (i.e., cross-sectional area), it is not surprising that differences in strength accounted for about one-third of the difference in the MAP response to exercise between groups, as indicated by the ANCOVA. That is, the greater active muscle mass, implied by the greater absolute force produced at 30% MVC by controls, resulted in a greater MAP response.
Overall, these cardiovascular data suggest that the mechanism for the blunted pressor response was not an impaired autonomic reflex but was rather a smaller afferent signal from the muscle. This possibility is consistent with our finding of a blunted muscle metabolic response during exercise in the MS subjects.Muscle metabolism. Our observation of a diminished muscle metabolic response to voluntary isometric exercise confirms our previous observation made during intermittent graded isometric exercise in a different group of MS volunteers (22). This blunted metabolic response suggests that factors limiting endurance are different in MS compared with control subjects and that muscle metabolism did not limit endurance in MS. It is very unlikely that the difference in the metabolic response was because of a higher metabolic capacity in the MS group, because oxidative capacity is markedly reduced in the dorsiflexor muscles in MS (20, 21). It could be hypothesized that central muscle activation was impaired in MS, leading to incomplete muscle activation and therefore a reduced metabolic demand in the muscle. However, our activation measures argue against this possibility. Central activation, measured by the central activation ratio, was not different between MS and control subjects before or at the end of exercise. Similarly, the integrated EMG increased to similar levels at end exercise in both groups, suggesting that neural drive (4) was similar between groups. The EMG median spectral frequency decreased by end exercise in the control compared with MS subjects. However, changes in EMG spectral frequency are thought to reflect, in large part, the accumulation of metabolic by-products (e.g., H+), which may result in a slowing of sarcolemmal action potential conduction velocity and a decrease in EMG median spectral frequency (11). Thus the difference in median spectral frequency is likely a reflection of the differences in Pi concentration and pH during exercise in the two groups. Overall, these activation data suggest that the smaller metabolic response during submaximal exercise in MS was probably due to failure within the muscle itself, at a location upstream of the energy supply.
The observation of a diminished muscle metabolic response lessens the possibility of a primary, exercise-specific autonomic efferent abnormality. Such an abnormality, which might limit muscle perfusion pressure, would be expected to result in an increased muscle metabolic response during exercise, because a limitation in oxygen delivery results in a greater reliance on anaerobic energy sources. Thus, as observed previously in a different group of subjects (22), the diminished muscle metabolic response to voluntary exercise in the MS group is puzzling. An alternative explanation for the smaller metabolic response in MS might be that, because of the weakness and lower absolute force produced in the MS group, there was less intramuscular pressure and therefore relatively better perfusion in MS compared with control during exercise. This might allow for better O2 delivery with the result that the energy needs of the muscle were met more fully by oxidative metabolism in the MS group. This interpretation is supported by the smaller change in Pi, Pi/PCr, and pH in MS compared with control subjects. Elucidation of the mechanisms of this response in MS awaits further investigation. In control and MS subjects, the stronger correlation of MAP and Pi, compared with MAP and pH, suggests that Pi was more important than pH in the generation of the exercise pressor response in these volunteers. The exercise pressor response is mediated by the reflex increase in muscle sympathetic vasoconstrictor activity that accompanies the increase in certain intramuscular metabolites (7, 48, 52). Previous work has shown that Pi or diprotonated phosphate (H2PO
4) are more
important than pH in evoking the exercise-induced increases in muscle
sympathetic vasoconstrictor activity and MAP (48), although the role of H2PO
4 is not unequivocal
(54). In addition, H+ was found to be an important mediator
of muscle sympathetic vasoconstrictor activity in some (42, 47, 52),
but not all (48, 54), studies. Thus the role of specific metabolites in
the activation of the exercise pressor reflex remains controversial.
For the purpose of this study, the observation of a dampened metabolic response in MS provides a new potential mechanism for the blunted pressor response observed in this group.
A difference was noted in the individual regression slopes of MAP to
metabolite concentrations between control and MS subjects (Table 2).
This difference suggests that the relationship between intramuscular
metabolites and the pressor response may be different in some persons
with MS compared with controls. In addition, although chemoreflex
"sensitivity" to pH was different between groups, there was no
difference in Pi sensitivity. The importance
of these observations is unclear at this time.
MS is a highly variable disease. Perhaps the variable nature of MS is
best illustrated by our finding of a significant difference in the
correlation coefficients for MAP and pH in MS subjects who reported
high compared with low symptomatic fatigue. Those persons with MS who
may have had an altered chemoreflex response to isometric exercise
(i.e., low correlation between MAP and metabolites) were also those
most likely to report increased symptomatic fatigue. Interestingly, the
correlation coefficient of MAP and pH in MS subjects who reported low
(normal) fatigue was similar to control, consistent with an intact
chemoreflex in those MS subjects. These findings may have important
clinical significance because symptomatic fatigue or lassitude is a
dominant complaint in MS (13, 14, 25, 39) and can interfere with
activities of daily living (13, 14, 25). Previous studies have found
that symptomatic fatigue does not correlate with disability level (13,
14, 25) or with muscle fatigue (46). We emphasize that these findings were observed in only a small number of volunteers. However, to our
knowledge, the observation of a possible relationship between cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction and symptomatic fatigue in persons
with MS is unique and awaits further study in a larger number of subjects.
Limitations. Much of our interpretation of chemoreflex function is based on magnetic resonance spectroscopy measurements of muscle metabolites. There are several limitations to this approach: 1) only intramuscular metabolites are measured and afferent stimulation by extracellular metabolites is inferred from these measurements; 2) only the area under the surface coil can be measured and these measurements are assumed to approximate the rest of the muscle; and 3) we measured proton and high-energy phosphate metabolites and not others that may have a role in the stimulation of chemosensitive nerve fiber endings, such as bradykinin or prostaglandins (33, 49).
We have emphasized the chemoreflex as a pressor mechanism in this study, but mechanoreflexes originating from pressure-sensitive nerve fiber endings also contribute to the exercise pressor reflex (18). However, mechanoreceptors are likely to be important primarily during the initiation of the contraction. Thus, even if mechanoreflexes were affected by MS, it would not alter our overall interpretations, which are based on the entire exercise response and occlusion. It is possible that cognitive or sensory deficits may have been confounding factors in the MS group. However, no significant cognitive or sensory impairments were noted in the clinical evaluations. Furthermore, sensory perception was similar in both groups during exercise, occlusion, and the cold pressor test, as indicated by the perceived exertion and pain scales. Thus, although cognitive and sensory abilities can be important considerations in MS, they did not appear to be factors affecting outcomes in this group of MS subjects. In summary, we have observed a normal HR but blunted exercise pressor and muscle metabolic responses in a group of mild to moderately impaired MS subjects compared with controls. The blunted pressor response may be largely appropriate to a blunted muscle metabolic response and differences in contracting muscle mass. Similarly, the normal responses to the Valsalva maneuver and cold pressor test argue against a generalized cardiovascular autonomic impairment in persons with MS. However, the regression and correlation analyses of MAP vs. metabolites suggest that some individuals with MS may have impairment of the autonomically mediated muscle chemoreflex during isometric exercise and that this may be related to symptomatic fatigue. These latter findings may have significant clinical relevance in this population.| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Tony Hill, Becky Bosch and Dr. Keith Engleke for assistance with data acquisition and analysis and Dr. John Neuhaus for statistical advice. We also thank the volunteers for participation in this study.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This study was supported by the National Multiple Sclerosis Society and the Jimmie Heuga Center.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: A. V. Ng, MRU (114M), UCSF/VAMC, 4150 Clement St., San Francisco, CA 94121 (E-mail: alexng{at}itsa.ucsf.edu).
Received 7 April 1999; accepted in final form 10 November 1999.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Alam, M.,
and
F. H. Smirk.
Observations in man upon a blood pressure raising reflex arising from the voluntary muscles.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
89:
372-383,
1937.
2.
Anema, J. R.,
M. W. Heijenbrok,
T. J. Faes,
J. J. Heimans,
P. Lanting,
and
C. H. Polman.
Cardiovascular autonomic function in multiple sclerosis.
J. Neurol. Sci.
104:
129-134,
1991[Web of Science][Medline].
3.
Ashworth, B.
Preliminary trial of carisoprodol in multiple sclerosis.
Practitioner
192:
540-542,
1964[Web of Science][Medline].
4.
Bigland-Ritchie, B.,
and
J. J. Woods.
Changes in muscle contractile properties and neural control during human muscular fatigue.
Muscle Nerve
7:
691-699,
1984[Web of Science][Medline].
5.
Borg, G. A.
Perceived exertion.
Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev.
2:
131-153,
1974[Medline].
6.
Bou-Holaigah, I.,
P. C. Rowe,
J. Kan,
and
H. Calkins.
The relationship between neurally mediated hypotension and the chronic fatigue syndrome.
JAMA
274:
961-967,
1995
7.
Boushel, R.,
P. Madsen,
H. B. Nielsen,
B. Quistorff,
and
N. H. Secher.
Contribution of pH, diprotonated phosphate and potassium for the reflex increase in blood pressure during handgrip.
Acta Physiol. Scand.
164:
269-275,
1998[Web of Science][Medline].
8.
Cartlidge, N. E.
Autonomic function in multiple sclerosis.
Brain
95:
661-664,
1972
9.
Chance, B.,
J. S. Leigh,
B. J. Clark,
J. Maris,
J. Kent,
S. Nioka,
and
D. Smith.
Control of oxidative metabolism and oxygen delivery in human skeletal muscle: a steady-state analysis of the work/energy cost transfer function.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
82:
8384-8388,
1985
10.
Cohen, J. A.,
K. F. Hossack,
and
G. M. Franklin.
Multiple sclerosis patients with fatigue: relationship among temperature regulation, autonomic dysfunction, and exercise capacity.
J. Neurol. Rehabil.
3:
193-198,
1989.
11.
De Luca, C. J.
Myoelectrical manifestations of localized muscular fatigue in humans.
Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng.
11:
251-279,
1984[Medline].
12.
Drory, V. E.,
P. F. Nisipeanu,
and
A. D. Korczyn.
Tests of autonomic dysfunction in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Acta Neurol. Scand.
92:
356-360,
1995[Web of Science][Medline].
13.
Fisk, J. D.,
A. Pontefract,
P. G. Ritvo,
C. J. Archibald,
and
T. J. Murray.
The impact of fatigue on patients with multiple sclerosis.
Can. J. Neurol. Sci.
21:
9-14,
1994[Web of Science][Medline].
14.
Freal, J. E.,
G. Kraft,
and
J. Coryell.
Symptomatic fatigue in multiple sclerosis.
Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.
65:
135-138,
1984[Web of Science][Medline].
15.
Freeman, R.,
and
A. L. Komaroff.
Does the chronic fatigue syndrome involve the autonomic nervous system?
Am. J. Med.
102:
357-364,
1997[Web of Science][Medline].
16.
Goodwin, G. M.,
D. I. McCloskey,
and
J. H. Mitchell.
Cardiovascular and respiratory responses to changes in central command during isometric exercise at constant muscle tension.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
226:
173-190,
1972
17.
Imholz, B. P.,
G. A. van Montfrans,
J. J. Settels,
G. M. van der Hoeven,
J. M. Karemaker,
and
W. Wieling.
Continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring: reliability of Finapres device during the Valsalva manoeuvre.
Cardiovasc. Res.
22:
390-397,
1988[Web of Science][Medline].
18.
Kaufman, M. P.,
J. C. Longhurst,
K. J. Rybicki,
J. H. Wallach,
and
J. H. Mitchell.
Effects of static muscular contraction on impulse activity of groups III and IV afferents in cats.
J. Appl. Physiol.
55:
105-112,
1983
19.
Kent-Braun, J. A.,
and
R. Le Blanc.
Quantitation of central activation failure during maximal voluntary contractions in humans.
Muscle Nerve
19:
861-869,
1996[Web of Science][Medline].
20.
Kent-Braun, J. A.,
A. V. Ng,
M. Castro,
M. W. Weiner,
D. Gelinas,
G. A. Dudley,
and
R. G. Miller.
Strength, skeletal muscle composition, and enzyme activity in multiple sclerosis.
J. Appl. Physiol.
83:
1998-2004,
1997
21.
Kent-Braun, J. A.,
K. R. Sharma,
R. G. Miller,
and
M. W. Weiner.
Postexercise phosphocreatine resynthesis is slowed in multiple sclerosis.
Muscle Nerve
17:
835-841,
1994[Web of Science][Medline].
22.
Kent-Braun, J. A.,
K. R. Sharma,
M. W. Weiner,
and
R. G. Miller.
Effects of exercise on muscle activation and metabolism in multiple sclerosis.
Muscle Nerve
17:
1162-1169,
1994[Web of Science][Medline].
23.
Kent-Braun, J. A.,
C. H. Walker,
M. W. Weiner,
and
R. G. Miller.
Functional significance of upper and lower motor neuron impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Muscle Nerve
21:
762-768,
1998[Web of Science][Medline].
24.
Kregel, K. C.,
D. R. Seals,
and
R. Callister.
Sympathetic nervous system activity during skin cooling in humans: relationship to stimulus intensity and pain sensation.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
454:
359-371,
1992
25.
Krupp, L. B.,
L. A. Alverez,
N. G. LaRocca,
and
L. C. Scheinberg.
Fatigue in multiple sclerosis.
Arch. Neurol.
45:
435-437,
1988
26.
Krupp, L. B.,
N. G. LaRocca,
J. Muir-Nash,
and
A. D. Steinberg.
The fatigue severity scale. Application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systematic lupus erythematosus.
Arch. Neurol.
46:
1121-1123,
1989
27.
Kurtzke, J. F.
Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS).
Neurology
33:
1444-1452,
1983
28.
Leonard, B.,
J. H. Mitchell,
M. Mizuno,
N. Rube,
B. Saltin,
and
N. H. Secher.
Partial neuromuscular blockade and cardiovascular responses to static exercise in man.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
359:
365-379,
1985
29.
Mark, A. L.,
R. G. Victor,
C. Nerhed,
and
B. G. Wallin.
Microneurographic studies of the mechanisms of sympathetic nerve responses to static exercise in humans.
Circ. Res.
57:
461-469,
1985
30.
Matthews, W. B.
Clinical aspects.
In: McAlpine's Multiple Sclerosis, edited by W. B. Matthews. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1991, p. 97-105.
31.
McCloskey, D. I.,
and
J. H. Mitchell.
Reflex cardiovascular and respiratory responses originating in exercising muscle.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
224:
173-186,
1972
32.
Medical Research Council.
Aids to the Examination of the Peripheral Nervous System. London: Her Majesty's Stationary Office, 1976. (Memorandum no. 45)
33.
Mitchell, J. H. J. B.
Wolffe memorial lecture. Neural control of the circulation during exercise.
Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.
22:
141-154,
1990[Web of Science][Medline].
34.
Nagle, F. J.,
D. R. Seals,
and
P. Hanson.
Time to fatigue during isometric exercise using different muscle masses.
Int. J. Sports Med.
9:
313-315,
1988[Web of Science][Medline].
35.
Ng, A. V.,
J. C. Agre,
P. Hanson,
M. S. Harrington,
and
F. J. Nagle.
Influence of muscle length and force on endurance and pressor responses to isometric exercise.
J. Appl. Physiol.
76:
2561-2569,
1994
36.
Ng, A. V.,
R. G. Miller,
and
J. A. Kent-Braun.
Central motor drive is increased during voluntary muscle contractions in multiple sclerosis.
Muscle Nerve
20:
1213-1218,
1997[Web of Science][Medline].
37.
Nordenbo, A. M.,
F. Boesen,
and
E. B. Andersen.
Cardiovascular autonomic function in multiple sclerosis.
J. Auton. Nerv. Syst.
26:
77-84,
1989[Web of Science][Medline].
38.
O'Leary, D. S.
Autonomic mechanisms of muscle metaboreflex control of heart rate.
J. Appl. Physiol.
74:
1748-1754,
1993
39.
Packer, T. L.,
A. Sauriol,
and
B. Brouwer.
Fatigue secondary to chronic illness: postpolio syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome, and multiple sclerosis.
Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.
75:
1122-1126,
1994[Web of Science][Medline].
40.
Pepin, E. B.,
R. W. Hicks,
M. K. Spencer,
Z. V. Tran,
and
C. G. Jackson.
Pressor response to isometric exercise in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.
28:
656-660,
1996[Web of Science][Medline].
41.
Poser, C. M.,
D. W. Paty,
L. Scheinberg,
W. I. McDonald,
F. A. Davis,
G. C. Ebers,
K. P. Johnson,
W. A. Sibley,
D. H. Silberberg,
and
W. W. Tourtellotte.
New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols.
Ann. Neurol.
13:
227-231,
1983[Web of Science][Medline].
42.
Pryor, S. L.,
S. F. Lewis,
R. G. Haller,
L. A. Bertocci,
and
R. G. Victor.
Impairment of sympathetic activation during static exercise in patients with muscle phosphorylase deficiency (McArdle's disease).
J. Clin. Invest.
85:
1444-1449,
1990.
43.
Sandroni, P.,
E. E. Benarroch,
and
P. A. Low.
Pharmacological dissection of components of the Valsalva maneuver in adrenergic failure.
J. Appl. Physiol
71:
1563-1567,
1991
44.
Seals, D. R.
Influence of active muscle size on sympathetic nerve discharge during isometric contractions in humans.
J. Appl. Physiol.
75:
1426-1431,
1993
45.
Senaratne, M. P.,
D. Carroll,
K. G. Warren,
and
T. Kappagoda.
Evidence for cardiovascular autonomic nerve dysfunction in multiple sclerosis.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry
47:
947-952,
1984
46.
Sharma, K. R.,
J. Kent-Braun,
M. A. Mynhier,
M. W. Weiner,
and
R. G. Miller.
Evidence of an abnormal intramuscular component of fatigue in multiple sclerosis.
Muscle Nerve
18:
1403-1411,
1995[Web of Science][Medline].
47.
Sinoway, L.,
S. Prophet,
I. Gorman,
T. Mosher,
J. Shenberger,
M. Dolecki,
R. Briggs,
and
R. Zelis.
Muscle acidosis during static exercise is associated with calf vasoconstriction.
J. Appl. Physiol.
66:
429-436,
1989
48.
Sinoway, L. I.,
M. B. Smith,
B. Enders,
U. Leuenberger,
T. Dzwonczyk,
K. Gray,
S. Whisler,
and
R. L. Moore.
Role of diprotonated phosphate in evoking muscle reflex responses in cats and humans.
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.
267:
H770-H778,
1994
49.
Stebbins, C. L.,
and
J. C. Longhurst.
Bradykinin-induced chemoreflexes from skeletal muscle: implications for the exercise reflex.
J. Appl. Physiol.
59:
56-63,
1985
50.
Sterman, A. B.,
P. K. Coyle,
D. J. Panasci,
and
R. Grimson.
Disseminated abnormalities of cardiovascular autonomic functions in multiple sclerosis.
Neurology
35:
1665-1668,
1985
51.
Thomaides, T. N.,
Y. Zoukos,
K. R. Chaudhuri,
and
C. J. Mathias.
Physiological assessment of aspects of autonomic function in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.
J. Neurol.
240:
139-143,
1993[Web of Science][Medline].
52.
Victor, R. G.,
L. A. Bertocci,
S. L. Pryor,
and
R. L. Nunnally.
Sympathetic nerve discharge is coupled to muscle cell pH during exercise in humans.
J. Clin. Invest.
82:
1301-1305,
1988.
53.
Victor, R. G.,
S. L. Pryor,
N. H. Secher,
and
J. H. Mitchell.
Effects of partial neuromuscular blockade on sympathetic nerve responses to static exercise in humans.
Circ. Res.
65:
468-476,
1989
54.
Vissing, J.,
S. F. Vissing,
D. A. MacLean,
B. Saltin,
B. Quistorff,
and
R. G. Haller.
Sympathetic activation in exercise is not dependent on muscle acidosis. Direct evidence from studies in metabolic myopathies.
J. Clin. Invest.
101:
1654-1660,
1998[Web of Science][Medline].
55.
Williams, C. A.,
and
A. R. Lind.
The influence of straining maneuvers on the pressor response during isometric exercise.
Eur. J. Appl. Physiol.
56:
230-237,
1987[Web of Science].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Bodor Central Neuronal Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2001; 91(1): 528 - 529. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bodor, A. V. Ng, R. G. Miller, and J. A. Kent-Braun Intramuscular Metabolic Responses to Voluntary Isometric Exercise in Multiple Sclerosis are Consistent with Central Neuronal Fatigue J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2000; 89(5): 2105 - 2105. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |