Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 88: 1014-1021, 2000;
8750-7587/00 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, L.
Right arrow Articles by Okazawa, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, L.
Right arrow Articles by Okazawa, M.
Vol. 88, Issue 3, 1014-1021, March 2000

Mechanical properties of the tracheal mucosal membrane in the rabbit. I. Steady-state stiffness as a function of age

Lu Wang1,2, Robert Tepper3, Joel L. Bert1, Kenneth L. Pinder1, Peter D. Paré2, and Mitsushi Okazawa2

1 Department of Chemical and Bio-Resource Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1Z4; 2 Pulmonary Research Laboratory, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6Z 1Y6; and 3 Pediatric Pulmonology, James Witcomb Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, Indiana 46223


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Airway responsiveness is exaggerated in infancy and declines with maturation. These age-related differences (R.S. Tepper, T. Du, A. Styhler, M. Ludwig, and J.G. Martin. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 151: 836-840, 1995; R.S. Tepper, S.J. Gunst, C.M. Doerschuk, Y. Shen, and W. Bray. J. Appl. Physiol. 78: 505-512, 1995; R.S. Tepper, J. Stevens, and H. Eigen. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 149: 678-681, 1994) could be due to changes in the smooth muscle, the lung, and/or the airway wall. Folding of the mucosal membrane can provide an elastic load (R.K. Lambert, J. Appl. Physiol. 71: 666-673, 1991), which impedes smooth muscle shortening. We hypothesized that increased stiffness of the mucosal membrane occurs during aging, causing an increased mechanical load on airway smooth muscle and a decrease in airway responsiveness. Forty female New Zealand White rabbits between 0.75 and 35 mo of age were studied. Rectangular mucosal membrane strips oriented both longitudinally and circumferentially to the long axis of the trachea were dissected, and the stress-strain relationships of each strip were tested. The results showed that the membrane was stiffer in the longitudinal than in the circumferential direction of the airway. However, there was no significant change with age in either orientation. We conclude that the mechanical properties of the airway mucosal membrane did not change during maturation and were not likely to influence age-related changes in airway responsiveness.

asthma; airway; bronchial constriction


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

EXAGGERATED AIRWAY NARROWING in response to pharmacological agonists is a characteristic feature of patients who have asthma. Because the narrowing of the airway in response to pharmacological stimuli is predominantly related to airway smooth muscle (ASM) contraction (10), the factors that relate ASM stimulation and airway narrowing, such as the elastic loads that ASM has to overcome during contraction, are of considerable interest. It has been speculated (10) that the load on ASM must limit its shortening because in vitro the muscle is capable of shortening more than 70% (14), a degree of shortening that could completely occlude all airways if it occurred in vivo.

When bronchial smooth muscle contracts and the diameter of the bronchus is reduced, the airway mucosal membrane develops folds to accommodate the reduction in diameter (6, 23). It has been suggested that this folding provides a load to the ASM. In a recent morphometric study of airway narrowing in canine lung (11), it was found that the degree of ASM shortening was inversely related to the relative mucosal area in individual airways. Theoretically, the bending stiffness of the mucosal membrane will vary as the third power of its thickness. If the stiffness of the mucosal membrane is significant, this result supports the potential role of mucosal folding as an impediment to airway narrowing. The results of a number of recent studies have shown that airway responsiveness declines with maturation (15-17). These age-related differences could be due to changes in ASM function and/or to changes in the mechanical properties of the lung parenchyma or airway wall. Progressive loss in compliance or increase in stiffness with age has been observed throughout the body (2, 18), e.g., the heart, arteries, lungs, and skin. This widespread increasing rigidity of tissues very likely plays an important role in the generalized physiological decline that characterizes the aging syndrome. If airway mucosal membrane folding represents a significant impediment to ASM shortening, a change in its thickness or mechanical properties could contribute to the decrease in airway responsiveness that occurs with increasing age. To test this hypothesis, we have measured the tensile stiffness of the tracheal mucosal membrane in rabbits between the ages of 0.75 and 35 mo. Two experimental techniques were employed. One is the static tensile testing technique, which measures tissue response to step input. This is particularly useful in terms of matching a mechanical model to the tissue's viscoelastic properties. The other technique, the so-called single-pulse testing, was used at each of the three levels of static extension before the next step change. This technique is efficient in terms of revealing the time-dependent mechanical properties of the tissue samples.


    METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Material and preliminary tests. A custom-designed stress-strain tester (19) was used in these experiments. The apparatus was equipped with a transducer that was able to measure force to 10 mg (Kulite transducer, BG series, Leonia, NJ) and a motor arm that moved in steps as small as 0.25 µm. By using the apparatus, changes in sample length over a wide range could be applied in either static or dynamic patterns. Both dynamic and static responses of the equipment were checked by testing a standard spring. It was shown that the equipment displayed its own dynamic response only at frequencies >100 Hz. The apparatus was coupled to a computer, which was used both to control and to record the length and tension signals. Both signals were calibrated before each tissue sample was mounted for testing. The classical Krebs solution was altered to eliminate Ca2+, which may facilitate the denaturation of collagen in the tissue (9) and thus could have altered the mechanical properties of the samples. The ingredients of the altered Krebs solution are (in g/l) 6.90 NaCl, 0.35 KCl, 0.29 MgSO4 · 7H2O, 0.16 KH2PO4, 2.10 NaHCO3, and 2.00 glucose. The solution was stored in a reservoir, which fed a 17-ml tissue bath. The reservoir was bubbled with 95% oxygen-5% carbon dioxide. The tissue bath was heated to maintain the Krebs at 37°C in the bath. By continuously circulating fresh solution to the tissue bath at a predetermined flow rate (27 drops/min), the pH was maintained at 7.4-7.5.

Tracheal mucosal membrane obtained from New Zealand White female rabbits was used in this study. The animals were killed with an intravenous overdose of ketamine hydrochloride. A few preliminary tests were performed to measure the strain imposed on the membrane in situ, the elastic limit of the membrane, and the strain distribution in a tissue sample along the direction in which elongation was applied.

Five animals were used to measure the strain of the mucosal membrane while the trachea was still intact (in situ). The trachea was removed from the animal's chest without being opened. Pairs of micromarkers (dots of carbon powder) were inserted on the inner surface of the tracheal tube on the tracheal wall opposite to the posterior membranous portion by looking down from one end. One pair of the markers was in the circumferential and the other in the longitudinal direction. The micromarkers were very stable; they can remain in place on the tissue for several hours. The distance between the two markers in each pair was measured to obtain the length in situ.

The trachea was then cut open from the posterior membranous portion, the region where the smooth muscle resides, to eliminate the smooth muscle from the membrane samples. The trachea was fixed on a dissection surface with the cartilaginous portion of the trachea facing a magnifying glass (Fig. 1). The tissue samples between the markers were dissected. It was observed that the membrane did not wrinkle up (or buckle) after resection, but instead a simple decrease of strain was seen. To measure the length in vitro, the dissected membrane was allowed to rest on a flat surface. The strain was calculated as (length in situ - length in vitro)/(length in vitro). Results were all positive, suggesting that the tracheal mucosal membrane is stretched in situ (see Table 1).


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Longitudinal and circumferential samples of trachea. A trachea is cut open longitudinally through the posterior membranous portion where the smooth muscle is. Samples were taken from the anterior wall opposite to the cut.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Measured strain in situ of rabbits' tracheal mucosal membrane

Before the samples in the apparatus were mounted, the ends of the specimen were held by small aluminum clips with the use of cyanoacrylate glue. The glue was used to prevent slippage between tissue and clips because slippage may affect the actual length change applied to the sample. In the preliminary experiments, we tested two samples obtained from immediately adjacent locations in a trachea: one by using the glue and the other fixed to the clips without using any glue. Both samples were mounted in the apparatus, which was filled with warm oxygenated Krebs solution, for the same time duration as an actual experiment. The tissue samples were stretched to various lengths. It was found that the tension readings from both samples were the same at the same degree of length change, which indicated that the glue did not affect the experimental results.

The elastic limit (4) of the mucosal membrane was determined by using four or five pairs of tracheal mucosal membrane. The samples were stretched incrementally until they would no longer return to their original length when the load was released. That length, which was ~40-50% longer than the resting length, was determined to be the elastic limit used in this study.

The distribution of the strain was measured using several samples. Three or four micromarkers were placed on the surface of each sample, forming a single line along the direction of elongation. The distance between two adjacent markers was ~1 mm. After loads were applied, the length changes between the two adjacent markers were measured. It was found that the length change of all segments increased with tension. The strain measurements of the segments were uniform across the sample.

Experimental procedure. Forty animals were used for the experiments. All of the tests were performed and completed within 6-8 h (5) of the death of the animals. One of the two samples (circumferential or longitudinal) from each animal was tested first in each experiment, and the order was randomized so that the freshness of the samples was about equal.

The trachea was removed and opened as described above. Two rectangular mucosal membrane strips (6 × 3 × 1 mm) were dissected from the cartilaginous portion of the trachea (free of smooth muscle) with the use of a razor blade. In one strip, the longest dimension was in the longitudinal direction of the trachea and in the other the longest dimension was circumferential to the tracheal long axis. Care was taken that the cartilage under the mucosal membrane was not included in the tissue samples. Both strips of tissue were tested individually; the strips were dissected immediately before mounting. Both ends of a tissue sample were held by small aluminum clips with cyanoacrylate glue. The specimen was mounted vertically between the two clip holders in the apparatus. The upper and lower holders were set at the appropriate angles to avoid twisting of the sample during elongation. One of the holders was attached to the force transducer, which remained in a fixed position; the other holder was attached to the motor arm that was moved along the long axis of the specimen by the stepper motor (Fig. 2). The motor arm was used to apply uniaxial deformation. The tension in the specimen was continuously monitored.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Experimental layout. PC, personal computer.

The tissue sample was preconditioned (2) after being mounted in the apparatus by repeated loading and unloading of the specimen to successively higher stresses up to 40% strain. At the end of this process, the specimen was allowed to equilibrate at zero tension for ~15-30 min. The distance between the two clips, which was the initial length, was measured with an optical micrometer with an accuracy of 0.001 cm.

By changing the position of the motor arm with a speed of 200 µm/s, the specimen was stretched uniaxially by 10% of its initial length as the first extension. The tension was observed to first increase to a certain level and then decrease gradually in an exponential-like fashion. About 15 min after the extension, the tension approached a constant value (plateau) (Fig. 3). The sample was then stretched a further 10% from the existing 10% strain to reach a strain of 20% and then another 10% from the existing 20% strain to reach 30% in the same fashion.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Tracing of a static tensile test (at 10% strain). Solid line, tension tracing; dotted line, position of the motor arm.

At each strain, five consecutive triangular pulse tests (Fig. 4) were initiated after the plateau of tension was reached. Pulse duration was set at 1.7 s. The pulse height was 15% of the actual length of the specimen. All tests were recorded at a 100-Hz sampling rate with 800 data points for each test. Data at each 10-ms interval were pooled and averaged to reduce noise.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Tracing of a single pulse test (at 10% strain). Solid line, tension tracing; dotted line, position of the motor arm.

At the end of a complete set of data acquisition, the motor arm was reset to the resting location to allow the length of the sample to return from 30% strain to its initial value. As the tissue buckled, the tension became negative and then slowly returned to zero in ~10 min.

After the physiological experiments, the tissue samples were fixed in 10% formalin under no load. The fixed samples were embedded vertically in paraffin (3) so that the cross section (the plane perpendicular to the direction of the force applied during experiments) of the samples could be obtained. Five discontinuous 3- to 5-µm sections were cut from each sample, and the areas of the cross sections were measured with an image-analysis system (Bioquant System IV, R&M Biometrics). The mean cross-sectional area (CSA0) was calculated and corrected by a shrinkage factor of 10% (3, 21) in each dimension.

Data analysis and modeling. Representative tracings of the motor arm position and tension signals are illustrated in Figs. 3 and 4. As shown in Fig. 3, the tension first increased to a certain level and then decreased with time until it approached a plateau. This phenomenon is called stress relaxation and is characteristic of a viscoelastic material (2, 18).

To be consistent with the literature and to derive meaningful parameters to characterize the mechanical properties of the tissue samples, the tension data were converted to engineering stress and the position data were converted to engineering strain imposed on the tissue samples. By definition (4, 18), engineering stress (sigma ) and strain (epsilon ) are expressed as
&sfgr; = <FR><NU>T</NU><DE>CSA<SUB>0</SUB></DE></FR> (1)
where T represents tension and CSA0 denotes the unloaded cross-sectional area, and
ϵ = <FR><NU><IT>l</IT> − <IT>l</IT><SUB>0</SUB></NU><DE><IT>l</IT><SUB>0</SUB></DE></FR> (2)
where l represents current length and l0 denotes the initial length.

The unit of stress was milligrams per square millimeter, which can be converted to the international unit kilopascals.

Analysis of static data. Ten to fifteen minutes after each extension in the static tensile test, the tension approached a plateau (Fig. 3). The tension at the plateau yielded the stress at steady state. In Fig. 5, the steady-state stress measured in repeated tests from the same sample was plotted against strain to show reproducibility. A linear relationship was fitted between the mean value of the stress and the strain over the entire range. The correlation coefficients were found to be >0.99. In this example, the longitudinal sample had a slope of 2,744 and the error of the slope was 153; for the circumferential sample, the slope was 509 and error of the slope was 22. The lines have been forced through the origin. A possible systematic error could have occurred in the experiments. Due to the effect of gravity, because the samples were mounted vertically, a state at which both the stress and strain were at zero was difficult to find.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Stress and strain relationship at steady state (static experiment). Solid symbols, longitudinal sample; open symbols, circumferential sample. Square, first test; circle, second repeat; triangle, third repeat; inverted triangle, mean value of all tests. Upper line, linear regression of the mean for the longitudinal sample (stress = 3,373.3 strain); lower line, linear regression of the mean for the circumferential sample (stress = 372.1 strain).

The slope of the linear fit gives the steady-state stiffness of the tissue sample under static tensile loading. As in Fig. 5, it was found in all tested samples that the longitudinal samples have a steeper slope than the circumferential ones.

Analysis of pulse data. The stress-strain data from the pulse tests were converted into frequency domain, and a transfer function was obtained from each pulse test. The algorithm for calculating the transfer function of the experimental data was (13, 20)
Transfer function = <FR><NU><LIM><OP>∑</OP><LL><IT>k</IT>=1</LL><UL><IT>n</IT></UL></LIM> stress (<IT>k</IT>&Dgr;<IT>t</IT>) ⋅ <IT>e</IT><SUP>−<IT>j</IT>ω<IT>k</IT>&Dgr;<IT>t</IT></SUP></NU><DE><LIM><OP>∑</OP><LL><IT>k</IT>=1</LL><UL><IT>n</IT></UL></LIM> strain (<IT>k</IT>&Dgr;<IT>t</IT>) ⋅ <IT>e</IT><SUP>−<IT>j</IT>ω<IT>k</IT>&Dgr;<IT>t</IT></SUP></DE></FR> (3)
where k was a counter going from 1 to n, n was the number of data points for each variable, j = <RAD><RCD>−1</RCD></RAD>, omega  = frequency (rad/s), and Delta t was the sampling interval (s).

Equation 3 was solved by using Euler's formula
e<SUP>−<IT>j</IT>ω<IT>k</IT>&Dgr;<IT>t</IT></SUP> = cos(ω<IT>k</IT>&Dgr;<IT>t</IT>) − <IT>j</IT> sin (ω<IT>k</IT>&Dgr;<IT>t</IT>) (4)
and substituting the recorded data. A ratio of two complex numbers, (d + cj)/(g + hj), was produced at each frequency. The denominator was cleared by multiplying both the numerator and denominator by its conjugate (g - hj) to give a single complex number (a + bj). Finally, the amplitude ratio or absolute gain (G) was given by
‖G(<IT>s</IT>)‖ = <RAD><RCD> <IT>a</IT><SUP>2</SUP> + <IT>b</IT><SUP>2</SUP></RCD></RAD> (5)
and the phase angle by
&thgr; = tan<SUP>−1</SUP> <FENCE> <FR><NU><IT>b</IT></NU><DE><IT>a</IT></DE></FR> </FENCE> (6)
Young's modulus is a constant for homogeneous materials at steady state. The absolute gain at frequencies approaching zero gives Young's modulus. Because the tissue samples were not homogeneous materials, the term "stiffness" was used instead of "Young's modulus."

The phase angle is a measure of the viscous component of the tissue response. The larger the angle, the higher the hysterisivity (8).


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We tested the repeatability of the results using the youngest group of animals (between 0.75 and 1 mo old). The experimental error was within 8%.

Static experiments. Table 2 shows the steady-state stiffness results (means ± SD). Five age groups are shown in Fig. 6: the youngest group and four groups of mature rabbits (16). There was not a statistically significant relationship between stiffness and age (P >=  0.3). ANOVA tests showed that there was no significant difference in the mean stiffness between the immature and the mature rabbits and that there was no difference among the mature ones. A t-test showed (P = 0.018) that the mean stiffness of the longitudinal samples was significantly larger than that of the circumferential samples.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.   Steady-state stiffness of airway mucosal membrane



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Steady-state stiffness vs. age groups. Error bars show SE. black-down-triangle , Longitudinal sample; open circle , circumferential sample.

Dynamic experiments (pulse tests). Unlike the results from the static experiments, the steady-state stiffness was calculated at each strain. It was obtained from a different experimental technique and analysis method. The steady-state stiffness was extrapolated from the absolute gain, which approaches a constant as the frequency approaches zero. Results (means ± SD) of the stiffness are presented in Table 2. The longitudinal samples were stiffer than the circumferential ones. There was a statistically significant increase in stiffness with strain. Also, similar to that found in the static experiments, the relationship between the steady-state stiffness and the age of the animals between 0.75 and 35 mo in both longitudinal and circumferential directions was not significant.

The stiffness at 1 Hz, which is close to breathing frequency, was calculated from the pulse test data. The mean stiffness is presented in Table 3. The longitudinal samples were still stiffer than the circumferential ones. Unlike that found at steady state, the tissue was significantly stiffer at 1 Hz, and the strain had no effect on the stiffness.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3.   Stiffness of airway mucosal membrane at 1 Hz

The calculated phase angles at a frequency of 1 Hz are listed in Table 4. There was no statistically significant correlation between the phase angle and the age of the animals. However, it was statistically significant that the mean phase angles in the longitudinal samples were smaller than in the circumferential ones, indicating that the longitudinal samples were more elastic and less viscous than the circumferential samples. Furthermore, statistical analysis showed that the phase angle changed inversely with the strain, i.e., the tissue displayed less viscosity when stretched.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4.   Phase angle of airway mucosal membrane at 1 Hz


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The results of the study showed that the rabbit airway mucosal membrane displayed viscoelastic properties, suggesting that the membrane is capable of providing elastic and viscous loads to the ASM during contraction. The membrane was stiffer in the longitudinal than in the circumferential direction of the airway. The magnitude of the steady-state stiffness measured using a static tensile test agreed with that derived from a dynamic pulse test. The dynamic pulse tests revealed that, under a steady-state condition (0 Hz), the stiffness increased with strain. However, under physiological conditions, the tissue is not likely to be at zero strain or at steady state. As shown by our data, the tissue samples were stretched to a strain ~20-30% before being removed from the trachea. At breathing frequency close to 1 Hz, the stiffness was significantly greater than that at steady state at all three strain levels. The effect of strain on the stiffness at 1 Hz was not significant, whereas the viscous component as measured by the magnitude of the phase angle changed inversely with strain and was greater in the circumferential than the longitudinal samples. There was no age effect on the stiffness. The stiffness at all ages was variable. This variation is partly due to the quantity and partly due to the orientation of the elastic fibers in each sample, which is described in the accompanying study (20a).

It is generally accepted that the ASM contracts against loads provided by the surrounding tissues such as the lung parenchyma. Okazawa et al. (11, 12) measured ASM shortening in canine lung lobes stimulated with maximal concentrations of carbachol. The degree of shortening of the ASM was significantly less than predicted on the basis of maximal unloaded shortening in the canine trachealis. To explain the limitation of shortening, they calculated the load that the lung parenchyma applied to the ASM. They found that the load related to the parenchymal distortion was insufficient to explain the limitation of ASM shortening in situ, and they suggested that additional loads may be provided by airway wall structures.

Mechanically, the mucosal membrane can be viewed as a thin-walled elastic tube, which collapses under the influence of a pressure difference across the wall. Lambert (7) suggested a model to describe the behavior of the bronchial basement membrane during airway collapse. The hypothesis, based on mathematical and physical considerations, was that this thin-walled elastic tube is capable of supporting some of the pressure imposed by the contracting ASM. This ability increases with the number and depth of folds into which the tube collapses. It is possible that the folding of the mucosal membrane accounts for the discrepancy between the observed and the predicted ASM shortening. Wiggs et al. (22) suggested a new airway mucosal folding model in which the membrane was viewed as two concentric layers of tissue having homogeneous but different Young's moduli. By varying the relative thickness and the mechanical properties of these two layers, the number of folds as well as the force necessary to generate the folds can be simulated (10, 11, 23).

Both of these models predict that the folding of the mucosal membrane may constitute a significant load influencing the ASM shortening, but knowledge of the mechanical properties of the mucosal tissue is required to quantify this effect. Ideally, it would be desirable to measure the stiffness of the mucosal membrane in the intraparenchymal airways, which are the sites of predominant airway narrowing. However, in this study, the tracheal mucosal membrane was chosen because it is more easily removed and separated from the ASM.

Numerous studies have been conducted to measure the elastic constant, or Young's modulus of soft biological tissues, although little has been reported on the incremental stiffness. As pointed out by Fung (2), the incremental modulus (equivalent to the stiffness measured at different strains) has a different physical meaning from the slope of the stress-strain relationship obtained from a static tensile test. In this study, the static tensile tests provided the conventional elastic constant, whereas the pulse tests gave incremental moduli. Table 2 compares the static results with the pulse results at all three strain values. Table 3 gives the incremental modulus at 1 Hz. We found that the incremental modulus was a function of frequency and only under steady-state conditions a function of strain. At steady state, the difference between the stiffness and the incremental modulus was small. For example, the magnitude of the stiffness measured from the pulse tests at 20% strain roughly represents a mean value of results at all three strains, and these results agree well with those measured using static tensile tests. This agreement supports the use of a static tensile test for the estimation of the steady-state stiffness of the airway mucosal membrane. Under physiological conditions that are not at steady-state, the incremental stiffness became significantly greater than that at steady state. This was not found using the static method.

When the two experimental methods are compared, the static tensile test is good for measuring the steady-state stiffness of tissues, and the static tracing can be used to suggest a mechanical model. On the other hand, the pulse test is a quick and efficient means by which to reveal important dynamic mechanical parameters such as the stiffness at various frequencies, the viscosity, and the time constants. These parameters characterize the viscoelastic properties of the tissue.

The tracing of the tension decay seen in a static tensile test can be used to obtain dynamic information. We have fitted a few static tracings and verified that the parameters obtained from the pulse analysis were reasonable. However, analyzing the static decay has been proved to be disadvantageous. First of all, as we have also shown in our study, the stiffness changes with frequency, which is not apparent from the static tests. Second, there was a large amount of noise in the static tracing, and it was sometimes difficult to find a true plateau of the tension signal. Third, if there was a response originated from the testing apparatus that had to be separated out from the collected data, the pulse test is certainly more convenient.

Young's modulus of ovine tracheal wall in the circumferential direction was reported by Codd et al. (1) to be ~20 kPa. In the case of ovine airways, there has not been a report on age-related changes either in the mechanical properties or in the airway responsiveness as has been reported for rabbits. The magnitude of the steady-state stiffness of the rabbit airway mucosal membrane in tension found in this study suggests that the mucosal membrane is capable of providing a significant load counterbalancing the stress generated by the ASM. A fold can be viewed as two compartments separated by an imaginary neutral plane in the center (7). If a fold is formed, the outer compartment is under tension, whereas the inner one is under compression. To describe fully the mechanical loads involved with folding, both an accurate measurement of the thickness of the membrane and the knowledge of the compressive properties of the tissue are still required (22). Furthermore, a model that predicts the interrelationship between the two compartments must be developed. Our study presented here only provides measurements of the mechanical properties in tension. It cannot be directly related to the buckling phenomenon.

Because there was no significant effect of age on the mechanical properties of the mucosal membrane, there must be another explanation for the age-related changes in airway responsiveness.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Financial support for this research was supplied by the Medical Research Council of Canada and the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada.


    FOOTNOTES

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: P. D. Paré, Pulmonary Research Lab., Univ. of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, McDonald Research Wing, 1081 Burrard St., Vancouver BC, Canada V6Z 1Y6 (E-mail: ppare{at}mrl.ubc.ca).

Received 4 November 1998; accepted in final form 6 November 1999.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1.   Codd, S. L., R. K. Lambert, M. R. Alley, and R. J. Pack. Tensile stiffness of ovine tracheal wall. J. Appl. Physiol. 76: 2627-2635, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

2.   Fung, Y. C. Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues (2nd ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag, 1994.

3.   Gordon, K., and P. Bradbury. Tissue processing, microtomy and paraffin sections. In: The Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques, edited by J. D. Bancroft, and A. Stevens. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1977, p. 29-64.

4.   Hayden, H. W., W. G. Moffatt, and J. Wulff. Mechanical properties. In: The Structure and Properties of Materials: Mechanical Behavior. New York: Wiley, 1965, vol. 3, p. 2-3, 23-43.

5.   Hildebrandt, J. Dynamic properties of air-filled excised cat lung determined by liquid plethysmograph. J. Appl. Physiol. 27: 246-250, 1969[Free Full Text].

6.   Kresch, E., and A. Noordegraaf. Cross-sectional shape of collapsible tubes. Biophys. J. 12: 274-294, 1972.

7.   Lambert, R. K. Role of bronchial basement membrane in airway collapse. J. Appl. Physiol. 71: 666-673, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

8.   Mijailovich, S. M., D. Stamenovic, and J. J. Fredberg. Toward a kinetic theory of connective tissue micromechanics. J. Appl. Physiol. 74: 665-681, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

9.   Miller, E. J. Chemistry of the collagens and their distribution. In: Extracellular Matrix Biochemistry, edited by K. A. Piez, and A. H. Reddi. New York: Elsevier, 1984, p. 62.

10.   Moreno, R. H., J. C. Hogg, and P. D. Paré. Mechanics of airway narrowing. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 133: 1171-1180, 1986[ISI][Medline].

11.   Okazawa, M., T. R. Bai, B. R. Wiggs, and P. D. Paré. Airway smooth muscle shortening in excised canine lung lobes. J. Appl. Physiol. 74: 1613-1621, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

12.   Okazawa, M., K. Ishida, J. Road, R. R. Schellenberg, and P. D. Paré. In vivo and in vitro correlation of trachealis muscle contraction in dogs. J. Appl. Physiol. 73: 1486-1493, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

13.   Stephanopoulos, G. Dynamic behavior of first order systems. In: Chemical Process Control: An Introduction to Theory and Practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984, p. 173-186.

14.   Stephens, N. L., and W. V. Niekerk. Isometric and isotonic contractions in airway smooth muscle. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 55: 833-838, 1977[ISI][Medline].

15.   Tepper, R. S., T. Du, A. Styhler, M. Ludwig, and J. G. Martin. Increased maximal pulmonary response to methacholine and airway smooth muscle in immature compared with mature rabbits. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 151: 836-840, 1995[Abstract].

16.   Tepper, R. S., S. J. Gunst, C. M. Doerschuk, X. Shen, and W. Bray. Effect of transpulmonary pressure on airway closure in immature and mature rabbits. J. Appl. Physiol. 78: 505-512, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

17.   Tepper, R. S., J. Stevens, and H. Eigen. Heightened airway responsiveness in normal female children compared with adults. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 149: 678-681, 1994[Abstract].

18.   Vincent, J. F. V. Basic theory of elasticity and viscoelasticity. In: Structural Biomaterials. New York: Wiley, 1982, p. 1-36.

19.   Wang, L. Dynamic Mechanical Response of Airway Mucosal Membrane (PhD thesis). Vancouver, BC: Univ. of British Columbia, 1997.

20.   Wang, L., J. L. Bert, M. Okazawa, P. D. Paré, and K. L. Pinder. Fast Fourier transform analysis of dynamic data: sine wave stress-strain analysis of biological tissue. Phys. Med. Biol. 42: 537-547, 1997[ISI][Medline].

20a.   Wang, L., K. L. Pinder, J. L. Bert, M. Okazawa, and P. D. Paré. Mechanical properties of the tracheal mucosal membrane in the rabbit. II. Morphometric analysis. J. Appl. Physiol. 88: 1022-1028, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].

21.   Weibel, E. R. Practical methods for biological morphometry. Stereological Methods. London: Academic, 1979, vol. 1, p. 153.

22.   Wiggs, B. R., C. A. Hrousis, J. M. Drazen, and R. D. Kamm. On the mechanism of mucosal folding in normal and asthmatic airways. J. Appl. Physiol. 83: 1814-1821, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

23.   Yager, D., J. P. Butler, J. Bastacky, E. Israel, G. Smith, and J. M. Drazen. Amplification of airway constriction due to liquid filling of airway interstices. J. Appl. Physiol. 66: 2873-2884, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].


J APPL PHYSIOL 88(3):1014-1021
8570-7587/00 $5.00 Copyright © 2000 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
P. B. Noble, A. Sharma, P. K. McFawn, and H. W. Mitchell
Elastic properties of the bronchial mucosa: epithelial unfolding and stretch in response to airway inflation
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2005; 99(6): 2061 - 2066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
L. Wang, P. Chitano, and T. M. Murphy
Maturation of guinea pig tracheal strip stiffness
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, December 1, 2005; 289(6): L902 - L908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. Latourelle, B. Fabry, and J. J. Fredberg
Dynamic equilibration of airway smooth muscle contraction during physiological loading
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2002; 92(2): 771 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. K. Lambert, P. D. Pare, and M. Okazawa
Stiffness of peripheral airway folding membrane in rabbits
J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2001; 90(6): 2041 - 2047.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
L. Wang, K. L. Pinder, J. L. Bert, M. Okazawa, and P. D. Pare
Mechanical properties of the tracheal mucosal membrane in the rabbit. II. Morphometric analysis
J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2000; 88(3): 1022 - 1028.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
P. Chitano, C. M. Cox, and T. M. Murphy
Relaxation of guinea pig trachealis during electrical field stimulation increases with age
J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2002; 92(5): 1835 - 1842.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, L.
Right arrow Articles by Okazawa, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, L.
Right arrow Articles by Okazawa, M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online