Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 88: 551-559, 2000;
8750-7587/00 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow A corrigendum has been published
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (60)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bouchard, C.
Right arrow Articles by Rao, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bouchard, C.
Right arrow Articles by Rao, D. C.
Vol. 88, Issue 2, 551-559, February 2000

Genomic scan for maximal oxygen uptake and its response to training in the HERITAGE Family Study*

Claude Bouchard1, Tuomo Rankinen1, Yvon C. Chagnon2, Treva Rice3, Louis Pérusse2, Jacques Gagnon2, Ingrid Borecki3, Ping An3, Arthur S. Leon4, James S. Skinner5, Jack H. Wilmore6, Michael Province3, and D. C. Rao3,7

1 Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808-4124; 2 Physical Activity Sciences Laboratory, Laval University, Québec, Canada G1K 7P4; 3 Division of Biostatistics and 7 Departments of Genetics and Psychiatry, Washington University Medical School, St. Louis, Missouri 63110; 4 School of Kinesiology and Leisure Studies, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455; 5 Department of Kinesiology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405; and 6 Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-4243


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

This study aimed to identify human genomic regions that are linked to maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max) in sedentary individuals or to the responsiveness of VO2 max to a standardized endurance training program. The results of a genomic scan based on 289 polymorphic markers covering all 22 pairs of autosomes performed on the Caucasian families of the HERITAGE Family Study are presented. The mean spacing of the markers was 11 cM, and a total of 99 families and 415 pairs of siblings were available for the study. VO2 max in the sedentary state was adjusted for the effects of age, sex, body mass, fat mass, and fat-free mass, whereas the VO2 max response was adjusted for age and baseline level of the phenotype. Two analytic strategies were used: a single-point linkage procedure using all available pairs of siblings (SIBPAL) and a multipoint variance components approach using all the family data (SEGPATH). Results indicate that linkages at P values of 0.01 and better are observed with markers on 4q, 8q, 11p, and 14q for VO2 max before training and with markers on 1p, 2p, 4q, 6p, and 11p for the change in VO2 max in response to a 20-wk standardized endurance training program. These chromosomal regions harbor many genes that may qualify as candidate genes for these quantitative traits. They should be investigated in this and other cohorts.

genetic markers; quantitative trait locus; linkage; candidate genes


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

MAXIMAL OXYGEN uptake (VO2 max) varies considerably among sedentary adults. In a recent report (3), we have shown that there is significant familial aggregation for VO2 max in the sedentary state even when the data are adjusted for age, sex, body mass, and body composition. These observations were derived from the HERITAGE Family Study, and they indicate that the heritability of VO2 max among sedentary adults after adjustment for the above covariates could be as high as 50% of the total phenotypic variance, although this value is undoubtedly inflated by nongenetic familial factors.

Twin and other family studies have been published in the peer-reviewed literature on this topic over the past three decades (6, 12, 17-21, 23, 31). Despite the fact that these studies vary considerably in sample size, phenotype measurements, data adjustment procedures, and analytic strategies, they generally concluded that there is a significant genetic component to VO2 max in the untrained state.

Moreover, there is evidence that the trainability of VO2 max is characterized by a significant level of familial aggregation. For instance, members of the same pairs of identical twins are significantly more alike than unrelated individuals in the VO2 max increase following exposure to a standardized training program. This was confirmed by the results of three different experimental studies with identical twins (16, 26, 29). The findings of these studies are remarkably concordant: the intraclass correlations for the intrapair resemblance in the VO2 max changes with training range from 0.65 to 0.77. The F ratios of the between-pair variance in VO2 max gain to the within-pair variance are quite similar, with a range from 6 to 9 (4). Such results have been further supported by the findings from the HERITAGE Family Study (1). The VO2 max response to the standardized training regimen of the HERITAGE Family Study exhibited familial aggregation, with some families characterized by a high-trainability pattern and others by low responsiveness. The maximal heritability of VO2 max trainability among the HERITAGE families of Caucasians reached 47% (1).

Ultimately, the nature of the genetic effects on human variation in VO2 max in the untrained state and in response to training will have to be resolved at the gene and molecular level. A handful of studies have considered the role of a few candidate genes on VO2 max in sedentary adults or VO2 max responsiveness to training (7) with mixed results. Another approach is to focus on the detection of quantitative trait loci (QTL) affecting these phenotypes. In a preliminary paper based on this strategy, we have reported the results of a first screen of chromosome 22 using seven polymorphic markers (13). No evidence for a QTL affecting VO2 max in the sedentary state or the changes in VO2 max with training was uncovered.

Here, we report the results of a genomic scan, based on 289 markers covering all autosomes, performed on the Caucasian families of the HERITAGE Family Study with a view to identify the genomic regions encoding genes contributing to human heterogeneity in VO2 max in the untrained state and its trainability.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Sample

The HERITAGE Family Study was designed to investigate the role of the genotype in cardiovascular, metabolic, and hormonal responses to aerobic exercise training and the contribution of regular exercise to changes in selected cardiovascular disease and diabetes risk factors. Five centers located at Indiana University, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, University of Minnesota, Texas A&M University, and Washington University are presently involved in the HERITAGE Family Study consortium. The study design, sample, and protocol have been described earlier (5).

A total of 481 individuals from 99 two-generation families of Caucasian descent (236 men, 245 women) were available for this study. The following criteria were applied to screen subjects for participation. First, individuals were required to be between the ages of 17 and 65 yr (17-40 yr of age for offspring and <= 65 yr of age for parents). Second, all participants were required to be sedentary at baseline. Third, individuals with a body mass index >40 kg/m2 were excluded unless they were able to meet the demands of the exercise tests and exercise training program. Fourth, resting blood pressure levels could not exceed 159 mmHg for systolic and 99 mmHg for diastolic. Antihypertensive drug therapy was also a cause for exclusion. Participants were required to be in good physical health and able to complete the 20-wk exercise program. Further details about the study, including inclusion and exclusion criteria, can be found in Bouchard et al. (5). Informed written consent was obtained from all subjects. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of each participating institution.

Exercise Training Program

The training program was conducted on cycle ergometers (Universal Aerobicycle, Cedar Rapids, IA) interfaced with a Mednet computer system (Universal Gym Mednet, Cedar Rapids, IA) to control the power output of the ergometers so that constant training heart rates could be maintained. Subjects started training at a heart rate associated with 55% of the initial VO2 max for 30 min/day and gradually progressed to 75% of the heart rate of the initial VO2 max for 50 min/day at the end of 14 wk. They maintained this intensity and duration throughout the remaining 6 wk. Frequency was maintained at three sessions per week throughout the 20-wk training program. The power output of the cycle ergometer was adjusted automatically to the heart rate response of the subject at all times during all training sessions. All training sessions were supervised on site. A detailed description of the training program can be found elsewhere (5, 30).

Maximal Oxygen Uptake Measurements

Each individual was examined with a battery of measurements before and after the 20-wk standardized exercise program. Two maximal exercise tests designed to lead to VO2 max on a cycle ergometer were performed on 2 separate days at baseline and again on 2 separate days after training on a SensorMedics 800S (Yorba Linda, CA) cycle ergometer connected to a SensorMedics 2900 metabolic measurement cart. The tests were conducted at about the same time of day, with at least 48 h between the two tests. An electrocardiogram was used to monitor heart rate. Gas exchange variables [O2 consumption (VO2), CO2 production (VCO2), minute ventilation, and respiratory exchange ratio (RER)] were recorded as a rolling average of three 20-s intervals. The criteria for VO2 max were RER >1.1, plateau in VO2 (change of <100 ml/min in the last three 20-s intervals), and a heart rate within 10 beats/min of the maximal heart rate predicted for that age. All subjects achieved a VO2 max by at least one of these criteria in at least one of the two tests, both pre- and posttraining. In the first test, subjects exercised at a power output of 50 W for 3 min, followed by increases of 25 W each every 2 min until volitional exhaustion. For older, smaller, or less fit individuals, who were generally the older mothers among the family members, the test was started at 40 W, with increases of 10-20 W each every 2 min thereafter. In the second test, subjects exercised for ~10 min at an absolute (50 W) and then for ~10 min at a relative power output equivalent to 60% VO2 max. They then exercised for 3 min at a relative power output that was 80% of their VO2 max, after which resistance was increased to the highest power output attained in the first maximal test. If subjects were able to pedal after 2 min, power output was increased every 2 min thereafter until they reached volitional fatigue.

If both values were within 5% of each other, the average VO2 max from these two tests was taken as the VO2 max for that subject and used in this analysis. If they differed by more than 5%, the higher VO2 max value was used. The reproducibility of VO2 max in these subjects was examined and was characterized by an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.97 for repeated tests with a coefficient of variation of 5% and no difference among clinical centers (3, 30). The VO2 max response was defined as the difference (ml O2/min) between posttraining VO2 max and baseline VO2 max (i.e., VO2 max response = posttraining VO2 max minus baseline VO2 max).

Molecular Studies

Genomic DNA was prepared from permanent lymphoblastoid cells by the proteinase K and phenol/chloroform technique. DNA was dialyzed four times against 10 mM Tris-1 mM EDTA (pH 8.0) buffer for 6 h at 4°C, and ethanol was precipitated.

Choice of markers. Microsatellite markers (di-, tri-, and tetranucleotide repeat) were selected from different sources but mainly from the Marshfield panel version 8a (http://www.marshmed.org/genetics) and the Location Database (LDB) maps (January 1999 version) from Southampton, UK (http://cedar.genetics.soton.ac.uk). The LDB summary map was also used to look for candidate genes 10 cM on each side of the markers yielding the strongest results. The mean spacing for the 289 markers was 11 cM with a range from 0.2 to 51 cM.

PCR conditions. PCR conditions and genotyping have been described in detail elsewhere (9). Briefly, PCR reactions were conducted using 250 ng of genomic DNA, 0.1 pmol of the forward primer coupled to the infrared tag IRD800 or IRD700 (LICOR), and 0.4 pmol of the reverse untagged primer (Research Genetics), 125 µM dNTPs, and 0.3 units Taq polymerase (Perkin-Elmer or Pharmacia) in PCR buffer (100 mM Tris · HCl, pH 8.3, 15 mM MgCl2, 0.5 M KCl, and 0.01% gelatin) for a final volume of 10 µl. PCR cycles followed a two-step procedure: 1 cycle at 93°C for 5 min, 10 cycles at 93°C for 20 s and 57°C for 60 s, and 24 cycles at 93°C for 20 s and 52°C for 60 s. Annealing temperature was defined according to the melting temperature of the primers used and ranged between 52 and 67°C, with a difference of 5°C being maintained between the two annealing temperatures.

Marker analysis. Automatic infrared DNA sequencers from LICOR were used to detect the PCR products. One microliter of each of the 52 samples, including up to five different markers, spaced with standards at each of the four samples, was applied to the gel. Standards were produced by PCR from a PUC19 plasmid using a tagged M13 forward primer (LICOR) and corresponding untagged reverse primer for each standard. The 18-cm long gel was run for 1.5-2 h. At the end of the run, an electronic image of the gel was produced and used for genotyping.

Genotyping. Automatic genotyping was performed using the computer software SAGA (Rick McIndoe, Roger Bumgarner, and Russ Welti, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; LICOR). In this process, sample and standard lanes were automatically found, the different markers were located on the gel, bands for each sample were identified, and genotyping was done simultaneously for a given marker on all the subjects of the study. After a manual edition of the typing, results were exported directly to a local dBase IV database (GENEMARK) in which a procedure had been developed to check for misinheritance (incompatibilities among the genotypes) within nuclear families and extended pedigrees. Subjects with incompatibilities were excluded from the database by GENEMARK and retyped completely for the incompatible markers, i.e., from the PCR reaction to the genotyping. Less than 5% of the subjects had to be retyped (mainly because of insufficient DNA amplification).

Data Adjustment

Two VO2 max phenotypes are considered. VO2 max at baseline was analyzed after adjustment for the effects of age (up to a cubic polynomial), sex, body mass, fat mass, and fat-free mass using stepwise multiple regression procedures, separately in each of the four sex-by-generation groups, and retaining only those terms that were significant at the 5% level. Fat mass and fat-free mass were estimated from an underwater weighing assessment of body density as recently described (33). The resulting squared residuals were similarly regressed on another polynomial in age (to adjust for heterocedacticity). The phenotype used in the genetic analysis was thus adjusted for relevant covariate effects in both the mean and variance. The phenotype was standardized to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of one. The percentage of variance accounted for by these covariates was quite large, ranging from 42.2% to 57.6%.

The response of VO2 max to training was adjusted for age and baseline VO2 max using a stepwise multiple regression procedure. Briefly, the response variable was regressed on up to a cubic polynomial in age plus baseline value within four sex-by-generation groups (fathers, mothers, sons, and daughters). Only terms significant at the 5% level were retained. The resulting squared residuals were similarly adjusted for effects on the variance; the final adjusted phenotype was standardized to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of one. Significant terms (percentage of variance) in each of the sex-by-generation groups for the VO2 max response phenotype were seen only in sons (9.2%) and daughters (5.0%). SAS (version 6.08) for PC was used for the regression analysis.

Statistical Analysis

First, single-point linkage analysis using all available sibling pairs was performed on these two phenotypes (SIBPAL; SAGE version 3.0). Second, analyses were carried out using the multipoint variance components analytic strategy implemented in SEGPATH (25). This is an extension of a path model for analysis of family resemblance (24) in which correlations among family members are modeled as functions of the allele sharing at a marker locus and a residual component including genetic as well as shared environmental effects. In addition to the trait locus heritability (h2g) and the residual heritability (h2r), the spouse correlation and excess sibling resemblance beyond that predicted under the genetic model were estimated by maximum likelihood. Linkage was tested by the likelihood ratio test of the null hypothesis h2g = 0. Multipoint estimation of identical by descent was used in the SEGPATH analysis, whereas a single-point approach was implemented in SIBPAL. The number of families available for the SEGPATH analysis was 99. The SIBPAL linkage analyses were undertaken with 415 pairs of siblings at baseline and 327 for the response to training. Suggestive evidence of linkage was defined as P < 0.01, whereas weaker but potentially useful evidence of linkage was identified as 0.01 < P < 0.05.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

General trends in the linkage results are depicted in Figs. 1 and 2 for the 22 autosomes. In Fig. 1, the evidence for linkage (P values) from SEGPATH and SIBPAL is illustrated for the baseline VO2 max (adjusted for age, body weight, fat mass, and fat-free mass within each sex). Suggestive evidence of linkage can be seen for chromosomes 4, 8, 11, and 14 (P < 0.01). The training response (adjusted for age and baseline level by sex) results are shown in Fig. 2. Again, suggestive evidence of linkage is observed for chromosomes 1, 2, 4, 6, and 11. 


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Overview of the linkage results for the 22 autosomes (Ch1 to Ch22) based on SEGPATH and SIBPAL for maximal O2 uptake (VO2 max) in the sedentary state. Map distances in centimorgans (cM) are shown on the abscissa, and P values for the strength of the linkage relationships are shown on the ordinates. FM, fat mass; FFM, fat-free mass.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Overview of the linkage results for the 22 autosomes based on SEGPATH and SIBPAL for the VO2 max response to a standardized training program. Map distances in cM are shown on the abscissa, and P values for the strength of the linkage relationships are shown on the ordinates.

The details of all suggestive linkages for the pretraining VO2 max are summarized in Table 1. The region with the highest significance level with SEGPATH is located on the long arm of chromosome 4 (4q12) at map position 61.658 cM. Three additional regions for baseline VO2 max were identified with SIBPAL. These regions are located on chromosome 14q21.3 at map position 49.255 cM, chromosome 8q24.12 (128.157 cM), and chromosome 11p15.1 (21.174cM). Moreover, 11 regions on seven chromosomes (chromosomes 1, 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 13) with SEGPATH and 10 markers on six chromosomes (chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 22) with SIBPAL showed weaker but possibly useful evidence of linkage (0.01 < P < 0.05) with VO2 max in the sedentary state (Table 2).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Summary of the suggestive linkages (P < 0.01) with VO2 max in the sedentary state and in response to endurance training in the HERITAGE Family Study


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.   Summary of the potentially useful linkages (0.01 < P < 0.05) with VO2 max in the sedentary state in the HERITAGE Family Study

Multipoint analyses (SEGPATH) revealed two regions and single-point analyses (SIBPAL) revealed three regions with suggestive evidence of linkage with the VO2 max training response. The multipoint signals are located on chromosomes 4 (4q26, 127.793 cM) and 6 (6p21.33, 28.788 cM), whereas the single-point linkages are seen with markers on chromosomes 11 (11p14.1, 31.272 cM), 1 (1p11.2, 125.032 cM), and 2 (2p16.1, 62.602 cM). In addition, weaker but potentially useful linkages (0.01 < P < 0.05) were found with SEGPATH for regions located on chromosomes 3, 6, 9, and 13 plus for 15 markers on chromosomes 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, 15, 19, and 21 with SIBPAL (Table 3).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3.   Summary of the potentially useful linkages (0.01 < P < 0.05) with VO2 max response to endurance training in the HERITAGE Family Study


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

From the quantitative genetic evidence gathered in twin and family studies, it is justified to search for QTLs and, eventually, genes and mutations pertaining to VO2 max in the sedentary state and its responsiveness to training. The genetic dissection of these two phenotypes and their determinants will require a wide array of designs and technologies. At this time, only one linkage study has been reported in humans, but it has dealt with a limited number of markers on one chromosome only (13). Other studies have focused on candidate genes encoded in the nuclear DNA and on a few mitochondrial DNA sequences.

In the same population, we have earlier reported a maximal heritability of ~50% for the baseline VO2 max data (3). On the other hand, the maximal heritability estimate of the VO2 max response to training reached 47% for the same sample of families with 2.5 times more variance between families than within families. Thus the familial factors underlying VO2 max in sedentary families are quantitatively similar to those underlying its response to exercise training. However, although they are quantitatively about the same, the familial and genetic factors underlying the two phenotypes appear to be different, as indicated by the noncomparability of the linkage results for baseline VO2 max and VO2 max response. From the earlier observations on identical twins and nuclear families plus the recent data on the HERITAGE Family Study cohort, we previously concluded that VO2 max in the sedentary state and its trainability are highly familial with a significant genetic component (1, 3). It should therefore be possible to identify the genes and mutations responsible for the variability in both phenotypes. However, it must be recognized at the outset that it is unlikely that a single gene or very few loci will be sufficient to define the genetic component of VO2 max and trainability.

A few reports on the topic of genetic markers and performance have appeared over the past 30 years or so. The study of elite performance by means of genetic markers was first conducted during the 1968 Olympic Games in Mexico City (11). The purpose of that study was to test if there was any association between participation in the Olympic Games as an athlete and allelic variation in single-gene blood systems. Results indicated that participation in the 1968 Olympic Games was not associated with allelic variations in red blood cell antigens or enzyme variants of red blood cells. A second effort was carried out during the 1976 Olympic Games in Montreal (8, 10). No significant differences between Caucasian elite endurance athletes and controls were observed for genetic markers in red blood cell antigens and four red blood cell enzymes.

Since then, a handful of papers have dealt with the potential contribution of a few candidate genes. For instance, three studies have reported an association between the insertion allele of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism and indicators of performance (14, 15, 22). The ACE locus is encoded on 17q23. In the present study, no evidence of linkage was observed on chromosome 17 for either baseline VO2 max or its responsiveness to training. Therefore, it is not yet clear whether the ACE I/D polymorphism is truly of importance for physical performance in general or endurance performance in particular.

Skeletal muscle-specific creatine kinase (CKMM) is a legitimate candidate gene (19q13.22) to investigate in relation to endurance performance. Because CKMM activity level is two times greater in type II (fast-twitch) than in type I fibers (34), a low CKMM activity level is typical of the skeletal muscle of endurance athletes. An early study indicated that a CKMM protein charge variant was weakly associated with the ability to perform a 90-min endurance test (2). In addition, research on transgenic mice indicates that a low CKMM activity is associated with improved skeletal muscle resistance to fatigue (32). More recently, a sibling pair linkage study has shown a weak genetic linkage between the CKMM locus and changes in VO2 max (age, sex, and pretraining VO2 max adjusted) in the HERITAGE Family Study (28). This linkage was suggested again in the present study with a P value of 0.026 (Table 3). Moreover, we have reported a significant association between the CKMM genotype and the VO2 max response to 20 wk of endurance training in both parents and adult offspring of the HERITAGE Family Study (27). One-third of all homozygotes for the less-frequent allele (CKMM Nco I polymorphism in the 3' untranslated region) were observed in the low-responder group (lowest decile of response), whereas this genotype was not seen in any high responders (upper decile of response). The CKMM genotype accounted for ~10% of the variance of VO2 max response.

The chromosomal regions showing suggestive linkages with VO2 max in the sedentary state or in response to endurance training in the present paper encode several potential candidate genes. The marker D4S3248 on chromosome 4, which was the strongest signal with the baseline VO2 max in multipoint analyses, is located close (0.2 cM) to the beta -sarcoglycan gene. beta -Sarcoglycan is part of the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex, which acts as a structural link between the cytoskeleton of muscle and the extracellular matrix. It is thought to confer stability to the sarcolemma and protect muscle cells from contraction-induced damage. A gene of another dystrophin-associated protein, syntrophin beta -1, located 5.9 cM from the D8S592 marker, showed suggestive single-point linkage evidence with the baseline VO2 max. In addition, the genes encoding gamma -sarcoglycan (13q12.11), dystrophin-associated glycoprotein 1 (3p21.31), and lamin A/C (1q21.2) are located within 2.3 to 6.2 cM from markers, showing weak but potentially useful linkages with VO2 max in the sedentary state. The marker (D14S587) showing the strongest evidence of linkage with the baseline VO2 max in SIBPAL is located in the vicinity of the liver glycogen phosphorylase (0.6 cM) and the GTP cyclohydrolase I (1.8 cM) genes. GTP cyclohydrolase I is a rate-limiting enzyme in the synthesis of tetrahydrobiopterin, an essential cofactor of nitric oxide synthase.

A restriction fragment length polymorphism marker on chromosome 11p15.1 within the sulfonylurea receptor (SUR) gene exhibited one of the most significant linkages with VO2 max in the sedentary state. SUR is expressed in pancreatic beta -cells where it forms ATP-sensitive potassium channels together with an inward rectifier potassium channel member, Kir6.2, and is thereby involved in the regulation of insulin secretion. One cannot conclude from this linkage result that SUR itself has any effect on VO2 max variability. An alternative explanation could be that the SUR marker is a surrogate for a relationship with another gene such as Kir6.2 (KCNJ11), which is located close to the SUR locus. Unlike SUR, Kir6.2 is expressed in several tissues, including heart and skeletal muscle, where it plays a role in the coupling of cell metabolism to membrane potential.

Potential candidate genes located close to markers with suggestive linkages to VO2 max training response include the voltage-gated potassium channel gene (KCNA4) on chromosome 11p14.1 (0.1 cM from the marker), the pancreatic colipase (CLPS, 0.8 cM) gene and the hemochromatosis locus (HFE, 1.3 cM) on chromosome 6p21.33, the fatty-acid binding protein 2 (FABP2, 0 cM) gene and the long QT syndrome 4 locus (LQT4, 4.0 cM) on chromosome 4q26, the calmodulin 2 (CALM2, 0.5 cM) and the calcineurin B (PPP3R1, 3.4 cM) genes on chromosome 2p16.1, and the 3-beta -hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (HSD3B1, 0.1 cM) and the cardiac muscle calsequestrin (CASQ2, 5.5 cM) genes on chromosome 1p11.2. These genes are involved in cardiac contractility (KCNA4, LQT4), long-chain fatty acid absorption (CLPS, FABP2), calcium homeostasis and signaling in skeletal and cardiac muscle (CALM2, PPP3R1, CASQ2), and steroid hormone synthesis (HSD3B1). Although there is no direct evidence to support the notion that they are involved in human trainability, one could hypothesize that they contribute to interindividual variation in training response.

There was not a high degree of concordance between the single point and multipoint linkage results in the present study. The differences in the findings are likely explained by the relatively small sample sizes available for such studies, the marker spacing, which is relatively large in some chromosomal areas, and perhaps misspecification of the location of markers on the genetic map. The latter two factors could have had influences on the multipoint linkage results, particularly if errors of location exist in the current map, but would not have affected the single-point findings. Moreover, it should be recognized that, even though a panel of 289 markers is reasonably large for a first genomic screen, a more dense and accurate map will likely yield more and perhaps stronger signals in the future.

In summary, multipoint and single point linkage studies performed on the Caucasian families of the HERITAGE Family Study have revealed some indications of linkages with VO2 max in the sedentary state and with its responsiveness to training. None of the linkages is very strong. However, several linkages were found at the 0.01 level and better with markers on 4q, 8q, 11p, and 14q for VO2 max before training and with markers on 1p, 2p, 4q, 6p, and 11p for the gain in VO2 max in response to 20 wk of a standardized endurance training program. These chromosomal regions encode several candidate genes that should be investigated further.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Thanks are expressed to all the coprincipal investigators, investigators, coinvestigators, local project coordinators, research assistants, laboratory technicians, and secretaries who have contributed to the study and to Diane Drolet, MSc, for assistance with the preparation of this manuscript.


    FOOTNOTES

The HERITAGE Family Study is supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute through the following grants: HL-45670 (C. Bouchard, principal investigator), HL-47323 (A. S. Leon, principal investigator), HL-47317 (D. C. Rao, principal investigator), HL-47327 (J. S. Skinner, principal investigator), and HL-47321 (J. H. Wilmore, principal investigator). A. S. Leon is partially supported by the Henry L. Taylor Professorship in Exercise Science and Health Enchancement.

*  Original submission in response to a special call for papers on "Molecular and Cellular Basis of Exercise Adaptations."

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: C. Bouchard, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State Univ., 6400 Perkins Rd., Baton Rouge, LA 70808-4124 (E-mail: bouchac{at}pbrc.edu).

Received 31 August 1999; accepted in final form 29 October 1999.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1.   Bouchard, C., P. An, T. Rice, J. S. Skinner, J. H. Wilmore, J. Gagnon, L. Pérusse, A. S. Leon, and D. C. Rao. Familial aggregation of VO2 max response to exercise training: results from the HERITAGE Family Study. J. Appl. Physiol. 87: 1003-1008, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

2.   Bouchard, C., M. Chagnon, M. C. Thibault, M. R. Boulay, M. Marcotte, C. Côté, and J. A. Simoneau. Muscle genetic variants and relationship with performance and trainability. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 21: 71-77, 1989[ISI][Medline].

3.   Bouchard, C., E. W. Daw, T. Rice, L. Pérusse, J. Gagnon, M. A. Province, A. S. Leon, D. C. Rao, J. S. Skinner, and J. H. Wilmore. Familial resemblance for VO2 max in the sedentary state: the HERITAGE Family Study. Med. Sci. Sports. Exerc. 30: 252-258, 1998[ISI][Medline].

4.   Bouchard, C., F. T. Dionne, J. A. Simoneau, and M. R. Boulay. Genetics of aerobic and anaerobic performances. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 20: 27-58, 1992[Medline].

5.   Bouchard, C., A. S. Leon, D. C. Rao, J. S. Skinner, J. H. Wilmore, and J. Gagnon. The HERITAGE Family Study. Aims, design, and measurement protocol. Med. Sci. Sports. Exerc. 27: 721-729, 1995[ISI][Medline].

6.   Bouchard, C., R. Lesage, G. Lortie, J. A. Simoneau, P. Hamel, M. R. Boulay, L. Pérusse, G. Thériault, and C. Leblanc. Aerobic performance in brothers, dizygotic and monozygotic twins. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 18: 639-646, 1986[ISI][Medline].

7.  Bouchard, C., B. Wolfarth, M. A. Rivera, J. Gagnon, and J. A. Simoneau. Genetic determinants of endurance performance. Endurance in Sport (2nd ed.), edited by R. J. Shephard. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science. In press.

8.   Chagnon, Y. C., C. Allard, and C. Bouchard. Red blood cell genetic variation in Olympic endurance athletes. J. Sports Sci. 2: 121-129, 1984.

9.   Chagnon, Y. C., S. Roy, M. Chagnon, M. Lacaille, C. Leblanc, and C. Bouchard. High-throughput genotyping using infrared automatic Li-Cor DNA sequencers in the study of the obesity and co-morbidities genes. In: LiCor Application Note 500. Lincoln, NE: ; Li-Cor, 1998.

10.   Couture, L., M. Chagnon, C. Allard, and C. Bouchard. More on red blood cell genetic variation in Olympic athletes. Can. J. Appl. Sport Sci. 11: 16-18, 1986[Medline].

11.   DeGaray, A., L. Levine, and J. E. L. Carter. Genetic and Anthropological Studies of Olympic Athletes. New York: Academic, 1974.

12.   Fagard, R., E. Bielen, and A. Amery. Heritability of aerobic power and anaerobic energy generation during exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 70: 352-362, 1991.

13.   Gagnon, J., M. A. Ho-Kim, Y. C. Chagnon, L. Pérusse, F. T. Dionne, A. S. Leon, D. C. Rao, J. S. Skinner, J. H. Wilmore, and C. Bouchard. Absence of linkage between VO2 max and its response to training with markers spanning chromosome 22. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 29: 1448-1453, 1997[ISI][Medline].

14.   Gayagay, G., B. Yu, B. Hambly, T. Boston, A. Hahn, D. S. Celermajer, and R. J. Trent. Elite endurance athletes and the ACE I allele: the role of genes in athletic performance. Hum. Genet. 103: 48-50, 1998[ISI][Medline].

15.   Hagberg, J. M., R. E. Ferrell, S. D. McCole, K. R. Wilung, and G. E. Moore. VO2 max is associated with ACE genotype in postmenopausal women. J. Appl. Physiol. 85: 1842-1846, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

16.   Hamel, P., J. A. Simoneau, G. Lortie, M. R. Boulay, and C. Bouchard. Heredity and muscle adaptation to endurance training. Med. Sci. Sports. Exerc. 18: 690-696, 1986[ISI][Medline].

17.   Klissouras, V. Heritability of adaptive variation. J. Appl. Physiol. 31: 338-344, 1971[Free Full Text].

18.   Klissouras, V., F. Pirnay, and J. M. Petit. Adaptation to maximal effort: genetics and age. J. Appl. Physiol. 35: 288-293, 1973[Free Full Text].

19.   Lesage, R., J. A. Simoneau, J. Jobin, J. Leblanc, and C. Bouchard. Familial resemblance in maximal heart rate, blood lactate and aerobic power. Hum. Hered. 35: 182-189, 1985[ISI][Medline].

20.   Lortie, G., C. Bouchard, C. Leblanc, A. Tremblay, J. A. Simoneau, G. Thériault, and J. P. Savoie. Familial similarity in aerobic power. Hum. Biol. 54: 801-812, 1982[ISI][Medline].

21.   Maes, H. H. M., G. P. Beunen, R. F. Vlietinck, M. C. Neale, M. Thomis, B. Vanden Eynde, R. Lysens, J. Simons, and C. Derom. Inheritance of physical fitness in 10-yr-old twins and their parents. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 28: 1479-1491, 1996[ISI][Medline].

22.   Montgomery, H. E., R. Marshall, H. Hemingway, S. Myerson, P. Clarkson, C. Dollery, M. Hayward, D. E. Holliman, M. Jubb, M. World, E. L. Thomas, A. E. Brynes, N. Saeed, M. Barnard, J. D. Bell, K. Prasad, M. Rayson, P. J. Talmud, and S. E. Humphries. Human gene for physical performance. Nature 393: 221-222, 1998[Medline].

23.   Montoye, H. J., and R. Gayle. Familial relationships in maximal oxygen uptake. Hum. Biol. 50: 241-249, 1978[ISI][Medline].

24.   Province, M. A., and D. C. Rao. General purpose model and a computer program for combined segregation and path analysis (SEGPATH): automatically creating computer programs from symbolic language model specifications. Genet. Epidemiol. 12: 203-219, 1995[Medline].

25.  Province, M. A., T. Rice, I. B. Borecki, C. Gu, and D. C. Rao. A multivariate and multilocus variance components approach using structural relationships to assess quantitative trait linkage via SEGPATH. Genet. Epidemiol. In press.

26.   Prud'homme, D., C. Bouchard, C. Leblanc, F. Landry, and E. Fontaine. Sensitivity of maximal aerobic power to training is genotype-dependent. Med. Sci. Sports. Exerc. 16: 489-493, 1984[ISI][Medline].

27.   Rivera, M. A., F. T. Dionne, J. A. Simoneau, L. Pérusse, M. Chagnon, Y. C. Chagnon, J. Gagnon, A. S. Leon, D. C. Rao, J. S. Skinner, J. H. Wilmore, and C. Bouchard. Muscle-specific creatine kinase gene polymorphism and VO2 max in the HERITAGE Family Study. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 29: 1311-1317, 1997[ISI][Medline].

28.   Rivera, M. A., L. Pérusse, J. A. Simoneau, J. Gagnon, F. T. Dionne, A. S. Leon, J. S. Skinner, J. H. Wilmore, M. Province, D. C. Rao, and C. Bouchard. Linkage between a muscle-specific CK gene marker and VO2max in the HERITAGE Family Study. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 31: 698-701, 1999[ISI][Medline].

29.   Simoneau, J. A., G. Lortie, M. R. Boulay, M. Marcotte, M. C. Thibault, and C. Bouchard. Inheritance of human skeletal muscle and anaerobic capacity adaptation to high intensity intermittent training. Int. J. Sports Med. 7: 167-171, 1986[ISI][Medline].

30.   Skinner, J. S., K. M. Wilmore, A. Jaskólska, A. Jaskólski, E. W. Daw, T. Rice, J. Gagnon, A. S. Leon, J. H. Wilmore, D. C. Rao, and C. Bouchard. Reproducibility of maximal exercise test data in the HERITAGE Family Study. Med. Sci. Sports. Exerc. 31: 1623-1628, 1999[ISI][Medline].

31.   Sundet, J. M., P. Magnus, and K. Tambs. The heritability of maximal aerobic power: a study of Norwegian twins. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports. 4: 181-185, 1994.

32.   Van Deursen, J., A. Heerschap, F. Oerlemans, W. Ruitenbeek, P. Jap, H. ter Laak, and B. Wieringa. Skeletal muscles of mice deficient in muscle creatine kinase lack burst activity. Cell 74: 621-631, 1993[ISI][Medline].

33.   Wilmore, J. H., P. R. Stanforth, M. A. Domenick, J. Gagnon, E. W. Daw, A. S. Leon, D. C. Rao, J. S. Skinner, and C. Bouchard. Reproducibility of anthropometric and body composition measurements: the HERITAGE Family Study. Int. J. Obesity 21: 297-303, 1997.

34.   Yamashita, K., and T. Yoshioka. Profiles of creatine kinase isoenzyme compositions in single muscle fibres of different types. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 12: 37-44, 1991[ISI][Medline].


J APPL PHYSIOL 88(2):551-559
8570-7587/00 $5.00 Copyright © 2000 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
T. O. Kilpelainen, T. A. Lakka, D. E. Laaksonen, O. Laukkanen, J. Lindstrom, J. G. Eriksson, T. T. Valle, H. Hamalainen, S. Aunola, P. Ilanne-Parikka, et al.
Physical activity modifies the effect of SNPs in the SLC2A2 (GLUT2) and ABCC8 (SUR1) genes on the risk of developing type 2 diabetes
Physiol Genomics, October 19, 2007; 31(2): 264 - 272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. T. Lightfoot, M. J. Turner, A. K. Knab, A. E. Jedlicka, T. Oshimura, J. Marzec, W. Gladwell, L. J. Leamy, and S. R. Kleeberger
Quantitative trait loci associated with maximal exercise endurance in mice
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2007; 103(1): 105 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Epidemiol RevHome page
W. Yang, T. Kelly, and J. He
Genetic Epidemiology of Obesity
Epidemiol. Rev., June 12, 2007; (2007) mxm004v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
Z He, Y Hu, L Feng, Y Lu, G Liu, Y Xi, L Wen, X Xu, K Xu, and A Lucia
Polymorphisms in the HBB gene relate to individual cardiorespiratory adaptation in response to endurance training * Commentary
Br. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2006; 40(12): 998 - 1002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
H. L. Lujan, S. L. Britton, L. G. Koch, and S. E. DiCarlo
Reduced susceptibility to ventricular tachyarrhythmias in rats selectively bred for high aerobic capacity
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2006; 291(6): H2933 - H2941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
N. C. Gonzalez, S. D. Kirkton, R. A. Howlett, S. L. Britton, L. G. Koch, H. E. Wagner, and P. D. Wagner
Continued divergence in VO2 max of rats artificially selected for running endurance is mediated by greater convective blood O2 delivery
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2006; 101(5): 1288 - 1296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
W. E. Kraus and P. S. Douglas
Where Does Fitness Fit In?
N. Engl. J. Med., August 4, 2005; 353(5): 517 - 519.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
L. G. Koch and S. L. Britton
Divergent Selection for Aerobic Capacity in Rats as a Model for Complex Disease
Integr. Comp. Biol., June 1, 2005; 45(3): 405 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
V. L. Billat, E. Mouisel, N. Roblot, and J. Melki
Inter- and intrastrain variation in mouse critical running speed
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2005; 98(4): 1258 - 1263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
M. P. Massett and B. C. Berk
Strain-dependent differences in responses to exercise training in inbred and hybrid mice
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2005; 288(4): R1006 - R1013.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
J. Rico-Sanz, T. Rankinen, T. Rice, A. S. Leon, J. S. Skinner, J. H. Wilmore, D. C. Rao, and C. Bouchard
Quantitative trait loci for maximal exercise capacity phenotypes and their responses to training in the HERITAGE Family Study
Physiol Genomics, January 15, 2004; 16(2): 256 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. L. Troxell, S. L. Britton, and L. G. Koch
Genetic Models in Applied Physiology: Selected Contribution: Variation and heritability for the adaptational response to exercise in genetically heterogeneous rats
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2003; 94(4): 1674 - 1681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
U. M. Kujala, J. Kaprio, and M. Koskenvuo
Modifiable Risk Factors as Predictors of All-Cause Mortality: The Roles of Genetics and Childhood Environment
Am. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2002; 156(11): 985 - 993.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
K. K. Henderson, H. Wagner, F. Favret, S. L. Britton, L. G. Koch, P. D. Wagner, and N. C. Gonzalez
Determinants of maximal O2 uptake in rats selectively bred for endurance running capacity
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2002; 93(4): 1265 - 1274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. F. Feitosa, S. E. Gaskill, T. Rice, T. Rankinen, C. Bouchard, D. C. Rao, J. H. Wilmore, J. S. Skinner, and A. S. Leon
Major gene effects on exercise ventilatory threshold: the HERITAGE Family Study
J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2002; 93(3): 1000 - 1006.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
T. Rankinen, P. An, L. Perusse, T. Rice, Y. C. Chagnon, J. Gagnon, A. S. Leon, J. S. Skinner, J. H. Wilmore, D. C. Rao, et al.
Genome-wide linkage scan for exercise stroke volume and cardiac output in the HERITAGE Family Study
Physiol Genomics, August 14, 2002; 10(2): 57 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.