| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
,2, and1 Department of Exercise Physiology, Institute of Health and Sport Sciences University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba City 305-8574, Japan; and 2 The John B. Pierce Laboratory, Yale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06519
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
METHODS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
|
|---|
We examined the hypothesis that activation of the muscle metaboreflex during dynamic exercise would augment influences tending to cause a rise in arginine vasopressin, plasma renin activity, and catecholamines during dynamic exercise in humans. Ten healthy adults performed 30 min of supine cycle ergometer exercise at ~50% of peak oxygen consumption with or without moderate muscle metaboreflex activation by application of 35 mmHg lower body positive pressure (LBPP). Application of LBPP during the first 15 or last 15 min of exercise increased mean arterial blood pressure, plasma lactate concentration, and minute ventilation, indicating an activation of the muscle metaboreflex. These changes were rapidly reversed when LBPP was removed. During exercise at this intensity, LBPP augmented the release of arginine vasopressin and catecholamines but not of plasma renin activity. These results suggest that, although in humans hormonal responses are induced by moderate activation of the muscle metaboreflex during dynamic exercise, the thresholds for these responses may not be uniform among the various glands and hormones.
arginine vasopressin; lower body positive pressure; exercise; mean arterial blood pressure; muscle metaboreflex; plasma renin activity
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
|
|---|
DURING DYNAMIC EXERCISE, heart rate (HR) and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) are increased in a graded manner. The cardiovascular responses to dynamic exercise are thought to be regulated by a number of factors: 1) central command (26), 2) peripheral reflexes evoked by activation of afferent nerve endings (mechanical/metabolic) in the working skeletal muscles (14, 25), and 3) arterial and cardiopulmonary baroreflexes (26). Moderate-to-heavy dynamic exercise activates the muscle metaboreflex through the accumulation of metabolites, and this is thought to contribute to cardiovascular regulation. At such exercise intensities, several hormonal responses are also induced, such as increases in plasma renin activity (PRA), plasma vasopressin (AVP), and catecholamines (4, 9, 20). The muscle metaboreflex is implicated in modulating the hormonal response to moderate-to-heavy dynamic exercise (22); however, this interaction is poorly understood.
Yamashita et al. (34) showed that activation of group III and IV afferents from skeletal muscle elicits an increase in the activity of neurons in the supraoptic nucleus in cats, suggesting that the muscle metaboreflex may stimulate the posterior pituitary gland to secrete AVP. However, O'Leary et al. (22) found that during dynamic exercise, activation of the muscle metaboreflex (by decreasing blood flow to the active muscle) did not increase AVP or PRA in dogs. In fact, only when they attenuated the pressor response during the activation of the muscle metaboreflex did AVP release occur. O'Hagan et al. (21) reported that renal sympathetic nerve activity was augmented when activation of the muscle metaboreflex was induced by hindlimb ischemia during dynamic exercise in rabbits. An increase in renal sympathetic nervous activity would promote renin release (5, 11), although PRA was not monitored in the above study (21). In humans, Nishiyasu et al. (18) reported that sustained activation of the muscle metaboreflex induced significant increases in PRA as well as in plasma AVP, ACTH, and catecholamines during intermittent isometric handgrip exercise. However, it is unclear whether similar hormonal responses take place during dynamic exercise in humans as a result of activation of the metaboreflex. The purpose of this study was to examine the hypothesis that moderate activation of the muscle metaboreflex augments the neurohumoral response to dynamic exercise in humans and, if possible, to determine whether secretion of the various hormones is increased in a uniform or nonuniform manner.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
|
|---|
We studied 10 healthy volunteers (8 men and 2 women) with a mean age of
26 ± 2 yr, a body weight of 68.3 ± 2.8 kg, and height of 174.6 ± 3.0 cm. The subjects were nonsmokers, and none was taking any
medication. The female subjects' experiments were conducted during the
first 10 days of their menstrual cycle. Each subject gave written
informed consent before participating in this study. The experimental
protocol was approved by the Yale University School of Medicine Human
Investigation Committee. All subjects came to the laboratory for
orientation before the experiment and were familiarized with all
procedures and measurement devices. Each subject underwent a standard
test of peak oxygen consumption (
O2 peak) on a supine
bicycle ergometer.
O2 peak averaged 46.3 ± 2.1 ml · kg
1 · min1.
Each subject performed two supine exercise protocols on separate days
at an ambient temperature of 27°C (<35% relative humidity, minimal air speed).
Procedures. Subjects were instructed to drink 1 liter of water the night before the experiment and to refrain from beverages containing caffeine or alcohol. On arriving at the laboratory at 7 AM, the subjects drank 8 ml/kg tap water, ate a light breakfast, and sat quietly for 2 h before beginning the experiment.
Each subject then entered the environmental chamber (27 ± 0.1°C, <35% relative humidity), swallowed an esophageal thermocouple, and assumed the supine position, with the lower torso up to the iliac crest enclosed in the lower body negative pressure (LBPP) box. A seal was established in the waist region at the level of the iliac crest with the aid of flexible neoprene shorts. The LBPP box was designed to allow supine exercise on a Collins electronically braked cycle ergometer placed within the box. The cycle ergometer was located on an adjustable slide to accommodate variations in leg length, and the box was constructed in such a way that during each cycle of the pedals the fully extended leg was never more than 20° above or below the horizontal plane of the hip. A saddle and a hip belt were provided to limit movement of the body during the application of LBPP. A Teflon catheter was inserted into a large antecubital vein for blood sampling. Each experiment consisted of 60 min of supine rest, 3 min of preexercise control data collection, and 30 min of continuous supine exercise at an intensity of 110 ± 4 W. This exercise intensity was identified during the graded maximal supine exercise protocol as the power required to elicit ~80% of the ventilation threshold, and it was ~50% ofO2 peak. The exercise
intensity was selected to meet the following criteria: 1) the
supine exercise itself (without LBPP) should not cause any accumulation
of lactate (La) during a 30-min exercise period, and 2) the
subjects should be able to complete 30 min of total exercise when LBPP
was applied for one-half of the exercise period. LBPP was 1)
applied 3 min before the onset of exercise, maintained for the first 15 min of exercise, and removed during the final 15 min of exercise
("on-off" protocol) or 2) applied throughout the last 15 min of exercise ("off-on" protocol). The order of
LBPP application was determined by a balanced crossover design.
Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and
heart rate were measured with a Colin blood pressure monitor (model
STBP-780B, Aichi, Japan) every 60 s. MAP was calculated as (SBP + 2DBP)/3. Body core temperature was measured every 30 s from a
thermocouple inserted through the nose and into the esophagus to a
depth of one-fourth the subject's height. During exercise, oxygen
consumption (O2), minute
ventilation rate (E), and respiratory
exchange ratio (RER) were measured once per minute by using a
SensorMedics metabolic cart. Thoracic impedance (Z0) was
measured once per minute by using a Minnesota impedance plethysmograph. For this purpose, a tetrapolar electrode system was used, with two
pairs of Mylar-tape ring electrodes being employed, one around the neck
and one around the trunk. Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were
recorded at 14 and 29 min of exercise.
Blood samples (15 ml) were obtained at rest (before the application of
LBPP or the start of exercise); at 5, 14, 20, and 29 min of exercise;
and 3 min after the end of exercise. Blood for hematocrit (Hct), Hb
concentration, and total protein (TP) concentration measurements was
immediately separated from each sample. The Hct was measured by using a
microcentrifuge, Hb concentration by the cyanomethemoglobin method, and
TP in the plasma by refractometry. Blood for the measurement of plasma
osmolality (Posm) was transferred to a lithium-heparin-treated tube and
centrifuged (4°C), and the osmolality of the separated plasma was
immediately measured by the freezing point depression method (model
3DII, Advance Instruments). Plasma La was measured in
duplicate by using an automatic glucose and La analyzer (model
2300STAT, Yellow Springs Instruments, Yellow Springs, OH). Blood
samples for the measurement of AVP concentrations were collected in
EDTA tubes and centrifuged at 4°C. Plasma was stored at
70°C until the assays were performed. Plasma AVP was determined by radioimmunoassay (Mitsubishi Yuka AVP assay kit). The
intra-assay coefficients of variation for 2.39 and 5.89 pg/ml AVP were
4.7 ± 1.1 and 5.7 ± 1.5%, respectively. The interassay coefficients of variation were 13.3 and 11.0%, respectively. All samples from a given subject were determined within the same assay batch. The extraction recovery of AVP was 66%.
PRA was determined by radioimmunoassay of generated angiotensin I after
incubation for 1 h at 37°C, by using a commercial kit. The intra-
and interassay coefficients of variation for the assay of PRA were
2.3% and 4.5%, respectively. Plasma levels of norepinephrine (NE) and
epinephrine (Epi) were determined by high-performance liquid
chromatography with electrochemical detection (Coulochem, ESA,
Chelmsford, MA) after alumina adsorption and extraction with acetic
acid. Dihydroxybenzylamine (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO) was used as
an internal standard in the determinations of NE and Epi levels. The
coefficients of variation for the plasma NE and Epi determinations
carried out in our laboratory are 3 and 5%, respectively.
Statistical analysis. Values are means ± SE for all 10 subjects, except in the case of the catecholamine data, which was for 8 subjects (6 men and 2 women). Statistical analysis was assessed by a repeated-measures analysis of variance followed by a protected least significant difference post hoc test. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
The ability of LBPP application to activate muscle metaboreflex was assessed by examining the changes in the metabolic and respiratory parameters illustrated in Fig. 1. Application of LBPP during the first 15 min of exercise had little impact onO2, whereas
application of LBPP during the last 15 min of exercise increased
O2. The removal of LBPP at 15 min into the exercise resulted in a slight decline in
O2.
E and RER were always higher during
exercise with LBPP than without. Plasma La averaged 0.7 ± 0.1 mM at
rest (Table 1), and it did not increase
significantly during exercise without LBPP. Application of LBPP at 15 min into the exercise increased plasma La to 2.5 ± 0.2 and 3.8 ± 0.4 mM at 20 and 29 min, respectively. When LBPP was applied during the first 15 min of exercise, plasma La increased to 2.1 ± 0.3 and 3.9 ± 0.6 mM at 5 and 14 min, respectively. After the release of LBPP at
15 min into the exercise, plasma La declined to 2.6 ± 0.5 mM by 29 min of exercise. When the first 15 min of exercise was performed
without LBPP, the subjects' own RPE averaged 12 ± 1 (14 min), and
this increased to 14 ± 1 (29 min) after the application of LBPP
(P < 0.05). When the first 15 min of exercise was performed
with LBPP, their RPE was 16 ± 1 (14 min), and this decreased to 11.1 ± 1 (29 min; P < 0.05) after the removal of LBPP.
|
|
The cardiovascular responses to activation of muscle metaboreflex are
shown in Fig. 2. Exercise without LBPP
increased MAP from 91 ± 1 at rest to 107 ± 3 mmHg by 3 min into the
exercise, and it was maintained at this level throughout the first 15 min of the exercise. Subsequent application of LBPP at 15 min increased MAP by 10 ± 3 mmHg within 1 min, and MAP reached 123 ± 3 mmHg by 19 min and then remained at this level for the rest of the 30 min
exercise. When applied at rest, LBPP increased MAP from 91 ± 2 to 97 ± 3 mmHg. During the first 15 min of exercise with LBPP, MAP
increased to 120 ± 3 mmHg at 15 min. The subsequent removal of LBPP
at 15 min decreased MAP by 11 ± 3 mmHg within 1 min, and it declined
to 96 ± 3 mmHg by the end of the exercise. Exercise without LBPP
increased HR to 124 ± 4 beats/min by 15 min, a rate lower than the
137 ± 4 beats/min recorded during exercise with LBPP. Application of
LBPP at 15 min increased HR to 144 ± 6 beats/min, whereas release of
LBPP caused HR to decrease to 128 ± 4 beats/min by the end of the
exercise.
|
Table 1 shows the impact of LBPP on plasma constituents at rest; at 5, 14, 20, and 29 min of exercise; and at 3 min into the recovery. During the first 14 min of exercise, Posm increased to 290 ± 1 mosmol/kgH2O without LBPP and to 293 ± 1 mosmol/kgH2O (P < 0.05) with LBPP. Posm increased further to 293 ± 1 mosmol/kgH20 within 5 min after the application of LBPP, and it increased further to 295 ± 1 mosmol/kgH2O by the end of the exercise. When LBPP was removed at 15 min into the exercise, Posm decreased to 291 ± 1 mosmol/kgH2O within 5 min, and it remained at this level for the remainder of the exercise. Hct, Hb, and TP concentration were always higher during exercise with LBPP than without.
Exercise with LBPP elevated AVP compared with exercise without LBPP
(Fig. 3A). The increase in AVP was
reversed when LBPP was removed. Similarly, exercise with LBPP elevated
NE and Epi compared with exercise without LBPP (Fig.
4). The increases in NE and Epi were
reversed when LBPP was removed. In contrast, the application of LBPP
had little or no impact on PRA during exercise (Fig. 3B).
|
|
Resting esophageal temperature was similar in both protocols, averaging
36.71 ± 0.05 and 36.73 ± 0.05°C. During exercise, esophageal
temperature increased to 37.35 ± 0.06 and 37.24 ± 0.05°C at 14 min with and without LBPP, respectively (P < 0.05). During the next 15 min of exercise, esophageal temperature increased to 37.61 ± 0.05 and 37.44 ± 0.06°C with and without LBPP, respectively. Z0 increased from 22.6 ± 1.2 
at rest to 23.2 ± 1.2 at 14 min without LBPP and to 23.0 ± 1.1 at 29 min with
LBPP. Z0 increased from 22.5 ± 1.2 at rest
to 23.1 ± 1.1 at 14 min with LBPP and to 23.2 ± 1.2 ] at 29 min without LBPP. Thus Z0 tended to be lower at 14 min and
29 min with LBPP than without LBPP; however, the differences were not significant.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
|
|---|
The application of positive pressure to the lower one-half of the body
increases tissue pressure and reduces the transmural pressure gradient
across the vasculature (15, 23). This leads to increases in both
central venous pressure (CVP) and MAP (2, 6, 16, 2, 29). When LBPP is
applied at rest, the increase in MAP (6 mmHg in the present study)
would be due to a combination of the direct mechanical effects of
increased tissue pressure on circulatory hemodynamics and the
activation of muscle mechanoreflexes (16, 28, 33). During dynamic leg
exercise, in addition to the effects mentioned above, the imposition of
LBPP reduces muscle blood flow and induces an accumulation of metabolic
by-products; these are thought to activate muscle metaboreceptors and
thus induce a reflex rise in MAP (1, 6, 19, 27, 30). In the present
study, the application of LBPP during dynamic exercise induced changes
in plasma La and respiratory parameters
(E and RER), which support the idea that
it has a positive influence on the accumulation of metabolic
by-products. In addition, MAP increased by 16-26 mmHg after the
application of LBPP during exercise, an increase some 10-20 mmHg
higher than that observed at rest. This additional increase in MAP
during dynamic leg exercise would reflect a moderate activation of the
muscle metaboreflex. Furthermore, the increases in MAP, plasma La
concentration, E, and RER seen during
dynamic exercise with LBPP were all reversed when the LBPP was
released. Thus our experimental protocol allows fairly rapid modulation
of the muscle metaboreflex during dynamic exercise in humans. The
principal new finding of this study is that moderate activation of the
muscle metaboreflex during dynamic exercise at ~50% of
O2 peak in humans
augments the secretion of AVP, NE, and Epi but not of PRA. These
findings indicate that, although hormonal responses are induced by
activation of the muscle metaboreflex during dynamic exercise in
humans, the thresholds for these responses may not be uniform among the
various glands and hormones.
Yamashita et al. (34) showed that activation of group III and IV afferents from skeletal muscle elicits an increase in the activity of neurons in the supraoptic nucleus in cats, suggesting that the muscle metaboreflex may stimulate the posterior pituitary gland to secrete AVP. In our experiment, dynamic exercise with LBPP was associated with an increase in AVP, and the release of LBPP during exercise caused AVP to return to the control levels. In dogs, O'Leary et al. (22) reported that the muscle metaboreflex provoked during dynamic exercise by decreasing blood flow to the active muscles did not increase AVP. It is likely that the large pressor response seen in the dog may also have influenced AVP secretion. In support of this hypothesis, O'Leary et al. showed that when the pressor response was attenuated by ganglion blockade during the activation of the muscle metaboreflex, AVP secretion was indeed augmented. In our experiment, the increase in MAP due to activation of the metaboreflex ranged from 10 to 20 mmHg; this is similar to (or lower than) the magnitude of blood pressure response at which O'Leary et al. saw AVP secretion. Thus, taken together, our results and those of O'Leary et al. (22) are consistent with the idea that an activation of the muscle metaboreflex that results in a moderate increase in MAP will augment AVP secretion.
Nishiyasu et al. (18) found that muscle metaboreflex activation in humans, produced by combined repeated isometric handgrip exercise and forearm vascular occlusion, increased AVP, PRA, ACTH, NE, and Epi. They suggested that a sustained activation of the muscle metaboreflex produced a general augmentation of the neurally mediated secretion of pressor hormones. Thus the consistent finding seems to be that activation of the muscle metaboreflex in humans causes secretion of AVP, NE, and Epi, both in a near-resting state (posthandgrip ischemia) and during dynamic exercise.
Several factors stimulate the secretion of AVP, with central osmoreceptor stimulation providing the primary signal derived from a monitoring of Posm (5, 24). Takamata et al. (31) reported that there is a linear relationship between Posm and AVP at rest. A linear relationship with a threshold (295 mosmol/kgH2O) is also seen during dynamic exercise (20). During exercise in the present study, application of LBPP increased Posm by 2 mosmol/kgH2O, which would be expected to increase AVP by less than 1 pg/ml (by using the published data). However, the actual increase in AVP after LBPP application was >4 pg/ml (see Fig. 3A). An increase in body core temperature is also known to augment osmotically stimulated AVP secretion (8, 31). At a Posm of 292 mosmol/kgH2O, a 1°C increase in body core temperature caused a 2 pg/ml increase in plasma AVP (31). On this basis, the esophageal temperature increase of 0.1°C seen here with LBPP should account for only a 0.2 pg/ml increase in AVP. Thus the increase in AVP seen with LBPP during dynamic exercise in the present study cannot be fully explained by the observed increases in Posm or body core temperature. This conclusion is valid if we assume that these two factors do not potentiate each other's effects during dynamic exercise.
The second factor that might affect AVP secretion is CVP. The application of LBPP during dynamic exercise might increase CVP by shifting blood to the upper part of the body. Z0, which is thought to be an indicator of changes in central blood volume (12), tended to decrease when LBPP was applied during exercise, suggesting an increase in CVP during LBPP. An increase in CVP would evoke a cardiopulmonary baroreflex, and this should, if anything, reduce the secretion of AVP. On this basis, the effects of such a blood shift cannot explain the increase in AVP seen during LBPP. The final factor we need to consider is emotional stress. Our subjects experienced some discomfort during LBPP, as shown by the elevation in RPE. Although it is known that an increase in AVP secretion occurs in association with significant mental stress or pain (10), it is not clear to what extent the small yet significant rise in RPE in this study might have influenced AVP secretion. Maxiner et al. (13) found that sustained long-term vascular occlusion produced pain equivalent to exercise with vascular occlusion, yet it did not increase MAP. Although we suspect that the mental stress experienced by our subjects was small, we cannot exclude the possibility that it may have contributed to the observed increase in AVP secretion.
O'Hagan et al. (21) reported that renal sympathetic nerve activity was augmented as a result of the activation of the muscle metaboreflex by hindlimb ischemia during dynamic exercise in rabbits. An increase in renal sympathetic nervous activity would be expected to promote renin release (5, 11), although PRA was not monitored in the above study (21). However, O'Leary et al. (22) reported that activation of the muscle metaboreflex response in running dogs, by decreasing blood flow to the active muscles, did not increase PRA. Nishiyasu et al. (18) found that muscle metaboreflex activation in humans, by forearm occlusion after isometric handgrip exercise, increased MAP by 25 mmHg and also significantly increased PRA. In the present study, PRA levels during exercise were not changed by the application of LBPP. There are at least two possible explanations for this lack of response. First, it may be that the intensity with which the muscle metaboreflex was activated by LBPP during dynamic exercise (at the level performed by our subjects) was not sufficient to cause an increase in PRA. The second possibility is that the increase in MAP during this moderate activation of the muscle metaboreflex (range of 10-20 mmHg in the present study) produced sufficient loading of arterial and/or renal baroreceptors to limit the increases in renal sympathetic nerve activity and PRA (11, 22). Most likely, both the intensity of activation of muscle metaboreflexes and the pressor-induced inhibition of renal sympathetic nerve activity interact to dictate the actual level of PRA.
It is known that the skeletal muscles and kidneys are the main sources of plasma NE at rest (7) and that the active muscles are the main source during dynamic exercise (3). Because the elevated level of MAP, which is mainly due to the increase in total peripheral resistance evoked by the muscle metaboreflex (16), was sustained during the LBPP, we can assume that sympathetic activity was enhanced to resistance vessels in the muscles and other organs. The sustained enhancement of sympathetic activity to those regions may also have caused greater NE release from these tissues and organs during the LBPP and so account for the elevated plasma NE seen during exercise with LBPP. Epi, on the other hand, is known to be mainly secreted by the adrenal glands in association with increased sympathetic efferent activity. The greater increases in both NE and Epi seen when LBPP was applied during exercise than during exercise alone would support the idea that the metaboreflex activated the efferent sympathetic pathways when LBPP was applied during dynamic exercise.
Limitations.
In this study, the interpretation of the data is limited by a few
methodological considerations. First, it is questionable whether the
hormonal responses seen in this study are characteristic only of the
actual combination of exercise intensity and LBPP used in our
experiments. We used an exercise intensity found during a graded
maximal supine exercise protocol to involve a power requirement sufficient to elicit ~80% of the ventilation threshold (~50% of O2 peak), and we
combined this with 35 mmHg LBPP to induce a sustained activation of the
muscle metaboreflex when LBPP was applied during dynamic exercise.
Previous studies have shown that the threshold for increases in PRA or
AVP during dynamic bicycle exercise is between 30 and 60% of maximum
O2 (9, 32). Our exercise
intensity (50% of
O2 peak) was near the
threshold identified in previous studies, and it was set below the
ventilation threshold. In this study, it can be concluded that the
physiological responses evoked during the application of LBPP were due
to activation of the metaboreflex during dynamic exercise. Furthermore,
by using our on-off and off-on protocols we were able to show rapid and reversible effects of the muscle metaboreflex. The exercise intensity was chosen so as to be just below the anaerobic thereshold. If the
intensity of the exercise had been above the anaerobic threshold, the
physiological response during exercise would not have reached a steady
state, thus making it difficult to determine whether the responses
occurring during the LBPP were due to activation of the metaboreflex or
to time-dependent effects induced by the accumulation of La (or to
other factors such as fatigue). Conversely, if the intensity of the
exercise had been well below the anaerobic threshold, an increase in La
and a physiological response related to the muscle metaboreflex
probably would not have occurred during LBPP.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank the volunteer subjects, Rick Wemple and Cheryl Kokoszka for technical assistance, and Michael Fritz for the design and construction of the LBPP box. We greatly appreciate the help of Dr. Robert J. Timms (English editing and critical comments).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Deceased 26 December 1998.
This study was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grants HL-20634 and HL-39818.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: T. Nishiyasu, Dept. of Exercise Physiology Institute of Health and Sport Sciences University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba City 305-8574, Japan (E-mail nisiyasu{at}taiiku.tsukuba.ac.jp).
Received 29 July 1998; accepted in final form 10 September 1999.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
|
|---|
1.
Alam, M.,
and
F. H. Smirk.
Observations in man upon a blood pressure raising reflex arising from the voluntary muscles.
J. Physiol. Lond.
89:
372-383,
1937.
2.
Bevegard, S.,
J. Castenfors,
and
L. E. Lindblad.
Effect of changes in blood volume distribution on circulatory variables and plasma renin activity in man.
Acta Physiol. Scand.
99:
237-245,
1977[ISI][Medline].
3.
Christensen, N. J.,
and
H. Galbo.
Sympathetic nervous activity during exercise.
Ann. Rev. Physiol.
45:
139-53,
1983[ISI][Medline].
4.
Convertino, V. A.,
L. C. Keil,
and
J. E. Greenleaf.
Plasma volume, renin, and vasopressin responses to graded exercise after training.
J. Appl. Physiol.
54:
508-514,
1983
5.
Cowley, A. W., Jr.
Vasopressin and cardiovascular regulation.
Int. Rev. Physiol.
26:
189-241,
1982[ISI][Medline].
6.
Eiken, O.,
and
H. Bjurstedt.
Dynamic exercise in man as influenced by experimental restriction of blood flow in the working muscles.
Acta Physiol. Scand.
131:
339-345,
1987[ISI][Medline].
7.
Esler, M.,
G. Jennings,
G. Lambert,
I. Meredith,
M. Horne,
and
G. Eisenhofer.
Overflow of catecholamine neurotransmitters to the circulation: source, fate, and functions.
Physiol. Rev.
70:
963-985,
1990
8.
Forsling, M. L.,
D. L. Ingram,
and
M. W. Stanier.
Effects of various ambient temperatures and of heating and cooling the hypothalamus and cervical spinal cord on antidiuretic hormone secretion and urinary osmolality in pigs.
J. Physiol. Lond.
257:
673-686,
1976
9.
Freund, B. J.,
E. M. Shizuru,
G. M. Hashiro,
and
J. R. Claybaugh.
Hormonal, electrolyte, and renal responses to exercise are intensity dependent.
J. Appl. Physiol.
70:
900-906,
1991
10.
Galbo, H.
Hormonal and Metabolic Adaptation to Exercise. New York: Thieme-Stratton, 1983.
11.
Kopp, U. C.,
and
G. F. DiBona.
Interaction between neural and nonneural mechanisms controlling renin release.
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Fluid .
246:
F620-F624,
1984.
12.
Kubicek, W. G.,
F. J. Kottke,
M. U. Ramos,
R P. Patterson,
D. A. Witsoe,
J. W. LaBree,
W. Remole,
T. E. Layman,
H. Schoening,
and
J. T. Garamela.
The Minnesota impedance cardiography
theory and applications.
Biomed. Eng.
9:
410-416,
1974[ISI][Medline].
13.
Maixner, W.,
R. H. Gracely,
J. R. Zuniga,
C. B. Humphrey,
and
G. R. Bloodworth.
Cardiovascular and sensory responses to forearm ischemia and dynamic hand exercise.
Am. J. Physiol. Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol.
259:
R1156-R1163,
1990
14.
Mitchell, J. H.,
and
R. F. Schmidt.
Cardiovascular reflex control by afferent fibers from skeletal muscle receptors.
In: Handbook of Physiology. The Cardiovascular System. Peripheral Circulation and Organ Blood Flow. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1983, sect.2, vol. III, pt. 2, chapt. 17, p. 638-658.
15.
Nielsen, H. V.
External pressure-blood flow relations during limb compression in man.
Acta Physiol. Scand.
119:
253-260,
1983[ISI][Medline].
16.
Nishiyasu, T.,
K. Nagashima,
E. R. Nadel,
and
G. W. Mack.
The effects of posture on the cardiovascular responses to lower body positive pressure at rest and during dynamic exercise.
J. Appl. Physiol.
85:
160-167,
1998
17.
Nishiyasu, T.,
M. Nishiyasu,
R. Sone,
and
N. Tan.
The effects of pulsed stimulation of muscle mechanoreflex on cardiovascular responses at rest and during dynamic exercise in humans.
In: 1997 Nagano Symposium on Sports Sciences. Carmel, IN: Cooper, 1998, p. 54-58.
18.
Nishiyasu, T.,
N. Tan,
K. Morimoto,
R. Sone,
and
N. Murakami.
Cardiovascular and humoral responses to sustained muscle metaboreflex activation in humans.
J. Appl. Physiol.
84:
116-122,
1998
19.
Nishiyasu, T.,
H. Ueno,
M. Nishiyasu,
N. Tan,
K. Morimoto,
A. Morimoto,
T. Deguchi,
and
N. Murakami.
Relationship between mean arterial pressure and muscle cell pH during forearm ischaemia after sustained handgrip.
Acta Physiol. Scand.
151:
143-148,
1994[ISI][Medline].
20.
Nose, H.,
A. Takamata,
G. W. Mack,
Y. Oda,
T Okuno,
D. Kang,
and
T. Morimoto.
Water and electrolyte balance in the vascular space during exercise in humans.
J. Appl. Physiol.
70:
2757-2762,
1991
21.
O'Hagan, K. P.,
S. M. Casey,
and
P. S. Clifford.
Muscle chemoreflex increases renal sympathetic nerve activity during exercise.
J. Appl. Physiol.
82:
1818-1825,
1997
22.
O'Leary, D. S.,
F. R. Noreen,
and
P. C. Churchill.
Muscle metaboreflex control of vasopressin and renin release.
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.
264:
H1422-H1427,
1993
23.
Reneman, R. S.,
S. W. Slaaf,
L. Lindbom,
G. J. Tangelder,
and
J.-E. Arfors.
Muscle blood flow disturbances produced by simultaneously elevated venous and total muscle tissue pressure.
Microvasc. Res.
20:
307-318,
1980[ISI][Medline].
24.
Robertson, G. L.,
R. S. Shelton,
and
S. Athar.
The osmoregulation of vasopressin.
Kidney Int.
10:
25-37,
1976[ISI][Medline].
25.
Rowell, L. B.,
and
D. S. O'Leary.
Reflex control of the circulation during exercise: chemoreflex and mechanoreflexes.
J. Appl. Physiol.
69:
407-418,
1990
26.
Rowell, L. B.,
D. S. O'Leary,
and
D. L. Kellogg.
Integration of cardiovascular control systems in dynamic exercise.
In: Handbook of Physiology. Exercise: Regulation and Integration of Multiple Systems. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1996, sect. 12, chapt.17, p.770-838.
27.
Rowell, L. B.,
M. V. Savage,
J. Chambers,
and
J. R. Blackmon.
Cardiovascular responses to graded reductions in leg perfusion in exercising humans.
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.
261:
H1545-H1553,
1991
28.
Shi, X.,
C. G. Crandall,
and
P. B. Raven.
Hemodynamic responses to graded lower body positive pressure.
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.
265:
H69-H73,
1993
29.
Sundberg, C. J.
Exercise and training during graded leg ischaemia in healthy man.
Acta Physiol. Scand. Suppl.
615:
1-50,
1994[Medline].
30.
Sundberg, C. J.,
and
L. Kaijser.
Effects of graded restriction of perfusion on circulation and metabolism in the working leg; quantification of a human ischemia model.
Acta Physiol. Scand.
145:
1-9,
1992[ISI][Medline].
31.
Takamata, A.,
G. W. Mack,
N. S. Stachenfeld,
and
E. R. Nadel.
Body temperature modification of osmotically induced vasopressin secretion and thirst in humans.
Am. J. Physiol. Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol.
269:
R874-R880,
1995
32.
Tidgren, B.,
P. Hjemdahl,
E. Theodorsson,
and
J. Nussberger.
Renal neurohormonal and vascular responses to dynamic exercise in humans.
J. Appl. Physiol.
79:
2279-2286,
1991.
33.
Williamson, J. W.,
C. G. Crandall,
J. T. Potts,
and
P. B. Raven.
Blood pressure responses to dynamic exercise with lower-body positive pressure.
Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.
26:
701-708,
1994[ISI][Medline].
34.
Yamashita, H.,
H. Kannan,
K. Inenaga,
and
K. Koizumi.
The role of cardiovascular and muscle afferent systems in control of body water balance.
J. Auton. Nerv. Syst.
10:
305-316,
1984[ISI][Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  T. Nishiyasu, T. Maekawa, R. Sone, N. Tan, and N. Kondo Effects of rhythmic muscle compression on cardiovascular responses and muscle oxygenation at rest and during dynamic exercise Exp Physiol, January 1, 2006; 91(1): 103 - 109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
Significant
difference with LBPP vs. without LBPP, P < 0.05.
