|
|
||||||||
Departments of 1 Anesthesiology, Environmental Health Sciences/Division of Physiology, and Radiology; 2 Environmental Health Sciences/Division of Physiology; 3 Anesthesiology/Critical Care Medicine and Pediatrics; and 4 Environmental Health Sciences, Biomedical Engineering, and Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21205
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The ability to successfully intubate the trachea of mice and control their ventilation is important for longitudinal studies requiring recovery from anesthesia and repeated pulmonary function measurements or other evaluations, such as the use of radiological imaging (e.g., computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging). We describe a method for rapid and repeated intubation of mice, with subsequent pulmonary function measurements at baseline and after an agonist challenge. We describe a simply constructed metal blade used as a laryngoscope to facilitate oropharyngeal exposure, transillumination of the neck to facilitate visualization of the trachea through the oropharynx, readily available polyethylene tubing to intubate the trachea, and a simple solenoid ventilator to maintain physiological ventilation and assess respiratory resistance and compliance. Brief infusions of acetylcholine through a needle into the jugular vein are used to assess the responsiveness of the airway smooth muscle.
general anesthesia; pulmonary function; ventilation
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
THE ABILITY TO SUCCESSFULLY INTUBATE the trachea of mice and control their ventilation is important for longitudinal studies requiring recovery from anesthesia and repeated pulmonary-function measurements or other physiological or anatomic measurements such as the use of radiological imaging (e.g., computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging). There have been some reports in the literature regarding the intubation and ventilation of mice, but most have not provided sufficient detail that would enable one to duplicate this procedure (2, 3, 7).
In this communication, we present a simple method of intubation and ventilation in mice by using a smoothed metal blade as a laryngoscope to facilitate oropharyngeal exposure, transillumination of the neck to facilitate visualization of the trachea through the oropharynx, readily available polyethylene (PE) tubing to intubate the trachea, and a simple solenoid ventilator to maintain physiological ventilation. This method proved useful for repeated pulmonary-function measurements and agonist challenge in individual mice.
| |
METHODS AND RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
For our studies, we used three species of common inbred mice (A/J, C3H,
and C57B/6), at 6-10 wk of age (Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor,
ME). Anesthesia was induced with etomidate (2 mg/ml), an
ultra-short-acting nonbarbiturate hypnotic agent, and fentanyl (50 µg/ml), a short-acting narcotic agent in a 3:1 mixture (0.2-0.3 ml ip). This dose can keep 20- to 25-g mice of these strains fully anesthetized for 20-30 min. The mouse was then suspended at an ~45° angle by the two front upper teeth by a rubber band attached to a Plexiglas support (Fig. 1). A 150-W
halogen light source (World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL) with
two 24-in. flexible fiber-optic arms allowed transillumination of the
trachea just below the vocal cords (Fig. 1). The positions of the
fiber-optic arms were adjusted in each mouse to provide the best
visualization of the trachea. A metal laryngoscope fabricated from
3/32-in. sheet brass (Fig. 2) was used to
lift the lower jaw of the mouse and keep the mouth open and the tongue
displaced to maximize oropharyngeal exposure. This provided a clear
view of the tracheal opening (Fig. 3).
During this direct visualization, a 2-cm-long PE-90 catheter attached
to the hub of a needle (Fig. 2) was inserted ~3 mm into the trachea.
This PE tubing had a tip beveled at ~45°, with the bevel on the
convex side of the natural curve of the tubing. To prevent tissue
damage from the bevel point, the sharp tip end was carefully rounded
off with small dissecting scissors. The mouse was then removed from the
Plexiglas support and attached to the mouse ventilator. The mouse was
ventilated at 120 breaths/min with a tidal volume of 200 µl. These
values have been previously shown to provide adequate ventilation in
mice of these sizes and strains (6).
|
|
|
We assessed potential air leaks around the endotracheal tube
by inflating the lung to 20 cmH2O
and measuring the change in pressure after the intubated lungs were
sealed off. Figure 4 shows negligible air
leak around the endotracheal tube at this pressure in one mouse. Thus
the elastic properties of the trachea around this size PE tubing are
sufficient to provide a reasonably tight functional seal. Similar
observations were also made in mice from other strains and at ages up
to 16 wk.
|
In some animals, we also tested the airway responsivity to intravenous
acetylcholine (ACh). With the solenoid ventilator, the respiratory
resistance and compliance can be quickly measured with a sudden
inspiratory occlusion, as previously described in detail (4). However,
the agonist delivery approach used by Ewart et al. (4) of direct
injection into the abdominal inferior vena cava does not
allow the animal to recover. To administer bronchoconstrictor agents in
the present study, we made a small incision in the neck to expose a
jugular vein. Then a 31-gauge needle was inserted into the jugular
vein. This needle was connected to a syringe containing ACh (0.67 µg/ml) with PE-10 tubing. The response to a 1-min ACh infusion at
stepwise increasing rates is shown in Fig.
5. Figure 5 also shows the respiratory
resistance and compliance at each of these infusion rates. Over this
dose range shown, there was a progressive 23% fall in compliance and a
270% increase in resistance. Note that to calculate the respiratory system resistance, it is necessary to subtract the resistance of the
intubation cannula, which, in our system, equals 1.7 cmH2O · ml
1 · s
1.
After the final concentration was delivered, the needle was withdrawn,
and the skin wound was closed with cyanoacrylate adhesive (Future Glue,
Pacer Technology, Rancho Cucamonga, CA).
|
Mice were then removed from the ventilator and monitored until they started to breathe spontaneously. This usually occurs within 1 min after removal. The endotracheal tube was then removed, and the mice were returned to their cages when they regained their righting reflex. All animals recovered, and normal mouse behavior was evident within 2 h.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Until recently, most studies in mice that required measurement of pulmonary function have been limited to one time point. Once the animal was anesthetized, the trachea was secured by incising the neck and performing a tracheostomy, with no allowance for recovery and repeated measurements. With the current interest in the development of genetic models using mice, the ability to perform longitudinal studies has many obvious advantages. It is to this end that we have described in detail the methods that allow repeated intubation, ventilation, and agonist challenge in mice. This method can be used for repeated pulmonary-function measurements over time. Furthermore, this method can also be used for other studies in mice, where surgery and recovery are required, or other protocols, which may include radiological imaging where respiratory control is necessary.
Although many aspects of the method described here are not new and have been used by different investigators, there has not been a comprehensive description that would allow others to duplicate the procedure. In their studies of cardiac electrophysiology in the C57BL/6J mouse, Berul et al. (2) described intubation of C57BL/6J mice via direct laryngoscopy, with transillumination of the ventral neck. These authors used a rodent respirator to successfully evaluate responses to pacing and other cardiovascular alterations. Unfortunately, their paper only provides cursory details on how the mice were intubated. In an abstract, Deyo and Wei (3) also mention a method of intubation in mice by using an endotracheal tube made from an over-the-needle catheter. However, there was sufficient trauma to the trachea, such that 3 of the 20 mice in their study group died due to complications from the technique. Neither of these two studies was concerned with repeated assessments of respiratory function and reactivity. One relatively new approach has been used for repeated assessments of airway reactivity in mice, which uses barometric plethysmography (5). Unfortunately, the complex variable derived for this purpose (Penh) does not have any clear relation to conventional resistance and compliance measurements and may be dominated by inspiratory and expiratory timing. Indeed, very recent work (1) demonstrated that airway responses to methacholine could be assessed, with less noise and greater reproducibility, simply by measuring the changes in ventilatory timing. The method we describe in the present paper does allow repeated measurements of conventional indexes of pulmonary function. We have not investigated the maximal number of repeated measurements that can be obtained, nor the timing between them. However, we have successfully been able to reintubate the mice and reinject the same jugular vein with ACh 1 wk later. We did observe minor wound adhesions and dried adhesive in the neck that needed to be dissected away to expose the jugular vein, but the repeat needle insertion and injection were without problem, and this second closure healed without complication.
In summary, we have described a method for rapid and repeated intubation of mice for baseline pulmonary-function measurements, measurement of conventional respiratory responses to agonist challenge, or for other studies where controlled ventilation is required for repeated experimental procedures.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. H. Brown, Dept. of Physiology, Rm. 7006, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 615 North Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21205 (E-mail: rbrown{at}welch.jhu.edu).
Received 13 May 1999; accepted in final form 2 August 1999.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Adler, A.,
G. Cieslewewicz,
A. Tomkinson,
E. W. Gelfand,
and
C. G. Irvin.
Comparison of barometric plethysmograpic parameters for measurement of airway responsiveness in mice (Abstract).
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
159:
A872,
1999.
2.
Berul, C. I.,
M. J. Aronovitz,
P. J. Wang,
and
M. E. Mendelsohn.
In vivo electrophysiology studies in the mouse.
Circulation
94:
2641-2648,
1996
3.
Deyo, D. J.,
and
J. Wei.
A novel method of intubation and ventilation in mice (Abstract).
Anesth. Analg.
88:
S176,
1999.
4.
Ewart, S. L.,
W. Mitzner,
D. A. DiSilvestre,
D. A. Meyers,
and
R. C. Levitt.
Airway hyperresponsiveness to acetylcholine: segregation analysis and evidence for linkage to murine chromosome 6.
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
14:
787-495,
1996.
5.
Hamelmann, E.,
J. Schwarze,
K. Takeda,
A. Oshiba,
G. L. Larsen,
C. G. Irvin,
and
E. W. Gelfand.
Noninvasive measurement of airway responsiveness in allergic mice using barometric plethysmography.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
156:
766-775,
1997
6.
Levitt, R. C.,
and
W. Mitzner.
Expression of airway hyperreactivity to acetylcholine as a simple autosomal recessive trait in mice.
FASEB J.
2:
2605-2608,
1988[Abstract].
7.
Otto-Verberne, C. J. M.,
A. A. W. Ten Have-Opbroek,
C. Franken,
J. Hrmans,
and
J. H. Dijkman.
Protective effects of pulmonary surfactant on elastase-induced emphysema in mice.
Eur. Respir. J.
5:
1223-1230,
1992[Abstract].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Z. Hantos, A. Adamicza, T. Z. Janosi, M. V. Szabari, J. Tolnai, and B. Suki Lung volumes and respiratory mechanics in elastase-induced emphysema in mice J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2008; 105(6): 1864 - 1872. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Shofer, C. Badea, Y. Qi, E. Potts, W. M. Foster, and G. A. Johnson A micro-CT analysis of murine lung recruitment in bleomycin-induced lung injury J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2008; 105(2): 669 - 677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Wright, M. Cosio, and A. Churg Animal models of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, July 1, 2008; 295(1): L1 - L15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Hamacher, M Arras, F Bootz, M Weiss, R Schramm, and U Moehrlen Microscopic wire guide-based orotracheal mouse intubation: description, evaluation and comparison with transillumination Lab Anim, April 1, 2008; 42(2): 222 - 230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Higgins, J. Sanchez-Campillo, A. G. Rosas-Taraco, J. R. Higgins, E. J. Lee, I. M. Orme, and M. Gonzalez-Juarrero Relative Levels of M-CSF and GM-CSF Influence the Specific Generation of Macrophage Populations during Infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis J. Immunol., April 1, 2008; 180(7): 4892 - 4900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. L. Ford, E. L. Martin, J. F. Lewis, R. A. W. Veldhuizen, M. Drangova, and D. W. Holdsworth In vivo characterization of lung morphology and function in anesthetized free-breathing mice using micro-computed tomography J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2007; 102(5): 2046 - 2055. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Glaab, W. Mitzner, A. Braun, H. Ernst, R. Korolewitz, J. M. Hohlfeld, N. Krug, and H. G. Hoymann Repetitive measurements of pulmonary mechanics to inhaled cholinergic challenge in spontaneously breathing mice J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2004; 97(3): 1104 - 1111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Tarnavski, J. R. McMullen, M. Schinke, Q. Nie, S. Kong, and S. Izumo Mouse cardiac surgery: comprehensive techniques for the generation of mouse models of human diseases and their application for genomic studies Physiol Genomics, February 13, 2004; 16(3): 349 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Parker and M. I. Townsley Evaluation of lung injury in rats and mice Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, February 1, 2004; 286(2): L231 - L246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Mitzner, C. Tankersley, L. K. A. Lundblad, A. Adler, C. G. Irvin, and J. H. T. Bates Interpreting Penh in mice J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2003; 94(2): 828 - 832. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. N. Lorenz A practical guide to evaluating cardiovascular, renal, and pulmonary function in mice Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2002; 282(6): R1565 - R1582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ewart, R. Levitt, W. Mitzner, G. Volgyesi, L. Tremblay, P. Webster, N. Zamel, and A. Slutsky Response to a Recently Published Manuscript J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2001; 90(5): 2016 - 2017. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. MITZNER, R. BROWN, and W. LEE In vivo measurement of lung volumes in mice Physiol Genomics, January 19, 2001; 4(3): 215 - 221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Volgyesi, L. N. Tremblay, P. Webster, N. Zamel, and A. S. Slutsky A new ventilator for monitoring lung mechanics in small animals J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2000; 89(2): 413 - 421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. WALTERS, M. WILLS-KARP, and W. MITZNER Assessment of cellular profile and lung function with repeated bronchoalveolar lavage in individual mice Physiol Genomics, January 24, 2000; 2(1): 29 - 36. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Liao, F. Ishikura, S. Beppu, M. Asakura, S. Takashima, H. Asanuma, S. Sanada, J. Kim, H. Ogita, T. Kuzuya, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of LV hypertrophy and function in aortic-banded mice: necropsy validation Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2002; 282(5): H1703 - H1708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |