Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 87: 1506-1512, 1999;
8750-7587/99 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barker, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barker, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, P. D.
Vol. 87, Issue 4, 1506-1512, October 1999

INVITED REVIEW
Measurement of cardiac output during exercise by open-circuit acetylene uptake

Rebecca C. Barker1, Susan R. Hopkins1, Nancy Kellogg1, I. Mark Olfert1, Tom D. Brutsaert1, Timothy P. Gavin1, Pauline L. Entin1, Anthony J. Rice2, and Peter D. Wagner1

1 Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093; and 2 Department of Thoracic Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Noninvasive measurement of cardiac output (QT) is problematic during heavy exercise. We report a new approach that avoids unpleasant rebreathing and resultant changes in alveolar PO2 or PCO2 by measuring short-term acetylene (C2H2) uptake by an open-circuit technique, with application of mass balance for the calculation of QT. The method assumes that alveolar and arterial C2H2 pressures are the same, and we account for C2H2 recirculation by extrapolating end-tidal C2H2 back to breath 1 of the maneuver. We correct for incomplete gas mixing by using He in the inspired mixture. The maneuver involves switching the subject to air containing trace amounts of C2H2 and He; ventilation and pressures of He, C2H2, and CO2 are measured continuously (the latter by mass spectrometer) for 20-25 breaths. Data from three subjects for whom multiple Fick O2 measurements of QT were available showed that measurement of QT by the Fick method and by the C2H2 technique was statistically similar from rest to 90% of maximal O2 consumption (VO2 max). Data from 12 active women and 12 elite male athletes at rest and 90% of VO2 max fell on a single linear relationship, with O2 consumption (VO2) predicting QT values of 9.13, 15.9, 22.6, and 29.4 l/min at VO2 of 1, 2, 3, and 4 l/min. Mixed venous PO2 predicted from C2H2-determined QT, measured VO2, and arterial O2 concentration was ~20-25 Torr at 90% of VO2 max during air breathing and 10-15 Torr during 13% O2 breathing. This modification of previous gas uptake methods, to avoid rebreathing, produces reasonable data from rest to heavy exercise in normal subjects.

maximal exercise; new methodology; inert gas


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

THE USE OF INSPIRED GASES to noninvasively measure pulmonary capillary blood flow, which then serves as an index of cardiac output (QT), has advantages over other techniques. Currently used invasive techniques include direct Fick O2 measurement (15), thermodilution, and dye dilution. Although such methods remain the gold standard of QT measurement in the clinical setting, the research setting has benefited from the application of noninvasive techniques. In particular, noninvasive techniques do not require a central venous or peripheral arterial catheter.

Several authors have introduced methodological variations of an acetylene (C2H2) or CO2 gas-rebreathing or single-breath technique to measure QT (4-6, 13, 16, 19, 21). These methods have been used in resting and exercising humans and animals. A method using a C2H2-rebreathing technique and mass spectrometry for continuous measurement of C2H2 in resting and exercising human subjects gave results that were not significantly different from those measured by dye-dilution techniques (19, 21). Furthermore, C2H2-rebreathing and Fick measurement of QT at rest and levels of work up to 90% of maximal O2 consumption (VO2 max) were not found to be statistically different (16).

A nonrebreathing variation of the above techniques would be desirable in exercise studies, especially at altitude, inasmuch as it does not involve potential increases in arterial PCO2 (PaCO2) or changes in arterial PO2 (PaO2) that may occur with rebreathing and themselves change QT. Moreover, such a method would be better accepted by subjects, because PaO2 and PaCO2 would remain unaffected. Becklake et al. (3) used such a method based on N2O in 1962, but it appears not to be in general use. In this investigation, we developed and report a C2H2-nonrebreathing technique that involves breathing a C2H2 gas mixture in an open-circuit system and measuring C2H2 uptake in a short-term, quasi-steady state. In particular, it acknowledges the problem caused by rapid recirculation of C2H2 back to the lungs in venous blood and allows for this in the calculations. Becklake et al. found that at lighter levels of exercise the recirculation of C2H2 was nonproblematic and, therefore, did not correct for this, but since we specifically wish to use this approach during maximal exercise, we believed that it was necessary to reexamine the issue of recirculation.


    METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Subjects

This study was approved by the Human Subjects Committee of the University of California, San Diego, and the University of Adelaide. Twelve nonsmoking healthy female athletes and 15 nonsmoking healthy highly trained male athletes with no prior history of respiratory or cardiac disease were included as subjects. After subjects gave written informed consent, a history was obtained, and a physical examination was performed to exclude cardiopulmonary abnormality. All subjects were then screened for pulmonary disease with standard pulmonary function tests (static and dynamic lung volumes) and single-breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity. There were three study groups: highly trained male athletes studied with C2H2 and direct Fick methods (n = 3, group 1), female athletes studied with the C2H2 method only (n = 12, group 2), and elite male athletes studied with the C2H2 method only (n = 12, group 3). Their anthropometric data are summarized in Table 1.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Subject descriptive data

Procedure

Group 1 (well-trained competitive cyclists). To first establish maximal exercise capacity, exercise was performed on an electronically braked cycle ergometer (Excaliber, Quinton Instruments, Gronigen, The Netherlands) equipped with a racing saddle and the subject's own pedals. After a 10- to 15-min warm-up at a self-selected workload and a 5-min warm-up at 150 W, the subjects rode a progressive exercise test (30 W/min) until they were unable to continue. Heart rate was monitored by cardiac monitor (Lifepak 6, Physio-control, Redmond WA). The subjects breathed through a nonrebreathing valve (model 2700, Hans Rudolph, Kansas City, MO), with a dead space of 100 ml. Expired gas was sampled continuously from a heated mixing chamber, and O2 and CO2 concentrations were measured with a mass spectrometer (model 1100, Perkin-Elmer, Pomona, CA). Expired gas flow was measured using a pneumotach (no. 3 Fleisch) and a differential pressure transducer (model DP45-14, Validyne, Northridge, CA), and the electrical signals from the mass spectrometer and the pneumotach were logged at 100 Hz with use of a 12-bit analog-to-digital converter. Ventilation (VE), O2 consumption (VO2), and CO2 production (VCO2) were calculated using a commercially available software package (Consentius Technologies, Salt Lake, UT). VO2 max was considered to be the average of the four highest consecutive 15-s measures of VO2.

For the direct Fick measurement of QT, the subjects returned to the laboratory on the following morning after ingesting a liquid-only breakfast. A 20-gauge arterial cannula was placed in the radial artery of the nondominant hand for blood sampling. A 5-F Swan-Ganz catheter was introduced percutaneously into the basilic vein and manipulated into the pulmonary artery for sampling of mixed venous blood. All catheters were placed using sterile technique under local anesthesia, and the subject was monitored by electrocardiogram by a physician who directed his attention exclusively to the subject. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation drugs and intubation equipment were available at all times. Two-milliliter arterial and mixed venous samples were collected at rest and after 4 min of exercise at each of 30, 60, and 90% of the previously determined VO2 max and maintained on ice until analyzed for Hb and O2 saturation measured using a CO-oximeter (model IL 282, Instrumentation Laboratories, Lexington, MA). QT was calculated using the Fick principle. These studies were a component of a more extensive exercise protocol (10).

Several weeks later the subjects returned to the laboratory and the VO2 max testing was repeated as described above. QT was measured at several workloads during the VO2 max test by the C2H2 technique (see below).

Group 2 (female recreational athletes). VO2 max was determined on an electronically braked cycle ergometer (Excaliber, Quinton Instruments). After warm-up at 50 W, subjects performed a progressive exercise test with work intensity ramped at 25 W/min until subjects were no longer able to continue. VE, VO2, VCO2, and heart rate were measured in the manner described above for group 1.

Workloads corresponding to 30, 60, and 90% of VO2 max were calculated. Thirty minutes after the initial VO2 max determination, subjects were studied at rest and at the above calculated workloads for 5 min at each level. VO2, VE, and VCO2 were measured as previously described; QT was measured by the C2H2 technique.

One week after the cycle ergometer protocol, subjects returned for a similar exercise test on a treadmill (Landice 8700 Sprint 3, Randolph, NJ) in which ramp speed was increased from a warm-up speed of 2.5 mph to a speed previously chosen by the subject. Ramp grade was then increased by 2%/min until the subject could no longer continue.

Workloads (speed and grade) corresponding to 30, 60, and 90% of VO2 max were calculated. Thirty minutes after the initial VO2 max determination, subjects were studied at rest and at the above calculated workloads for 5 min at each level. VE, VO2, and VCO2 were measured on a breath-by-breath basis; QT was measured by the C2H2 technique.

Group 3. Twelve elite male cyclists performed a protocol similar to that performed by group 2 on the cycle ergometer in normoxia and hypoxia (fraction of inspired O2 = 0.13) at rest and at 30, 60, and 90% of the previously determined normoxic and hypoxic VO2 max. The details of the VO2 max determination differed slightly from groups 1 and 2 and have been reported elsewhere (18). The order of the two tests was randomized with ~1 h between tests. Group 3 did not perform the treadmill protocol.

QT Measurement by Short-Term C2H2 Uptake

QT was measured in all three study groups by a nonrebreathing C2H2 technique. Just as for the rebreathing approach, this is based on the principle of mass balance: the rate of alveolar-capillary transfer of a soluble gas is proportional to pulmonary capillary blood flow, which equals QT in normal subjects. Subjects breathe through a one-way valve from a gas mixture containing known concentrations of C2H2 (1%), He (5%), O2 (20.9%), and N2 (73%). Concentrations of C2H2 and He are then measured continuously for 20-25 breaths by mass spectrometer (model MGA-1100, Perkin-Elmer; Fig. 1A). End-tidal [alveolar (PACO2)] and mixed expired (PECO2) PCO2 are also measured, along with VE, as described above.



View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   A: C2H2 and He signals at mouth during heavy exercise in subject RK. Slightly longer time to reach a constant value for inspired C2H2 than for He probably reflects better mixing of lower molecularweight He gas in inspired limb of breathing circuit. B: inspired end-tidal differences for C2H2 (arbitrary units) after correction by corresponding He differences during same 25-breath C2H2-He washin in subject RK at 260 W. , Value, backextrapolated to breath 1 of washin, used for cardiac output (QT) calculation. PIC2H2, inspired C2H2 partial pressure; PAC2H2, end-tidal (alveolar) C2H2 partial pressure.

End-tidal C2H2 concentrations (corrected for mixing with the ratio of inspired He to end-tidal He) are calculated for each breath, and this corrected end-tidal C2H2 concentration is then extrapolated back to breath 1 to account for C2H2 recirculation (Fig. 1B). QT (l/min) is then calculated according to the following mass conservation equation
<A><AC>Q</AC><AC>˙</AC></A><SC>t</SC> = <FENCE><FR><NU><A><AC>V</AC><AC>˙</AC></A><SC>e</SC> ∗ P<SC>e</SC><SUB>CO<SUB>2</SUB></SUB> ∗ (P<SC>i</SC><SUB>C<SUB>2</SUB>H<SUB>2</SUB></SUB> − P<SC>a</SC><SUB>C<SUB>2</SUB>H<SUB>2</SUB></SUB>)</NU><DE>&lgr; ∗ P<SC>a</SC><SUB>CO<SUB>2</SUB></SUB> ∗ P<SC>a</SC><SUB>C<SUB>2</SUB>H<SUB>2</SUB></SUB></DE></FR></FENCE>
where VE is expired ventilation (l/min BTPS), PECO2 is mixed expired PCO2, PACO2 is end-tidal (alveolar) PCO2, PIC2H2 is inspired C2H2 partial pressure, PAC2H2 is He-corrected end-tidal (alveolar) C2H2 partial pressure extrapolated back to breath 1 of the procedure, and lambda  is C2H2 blood-gas partition coefficient (BTPS).

The lambda  for C2H2 was measured directly on each subject in duplicate by use of gas chromatography (23).

Data Analysis

Paired parameters (VO2 and QT) were compared by standard linear regression analysis. Pearson product moment correlations were calculated for each regression analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using the paired t-test, with P < 0.05 (2-tailed) considered significant.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

General Data

Descriptive information for groups 1-3 is available in Table 1. Summary metabolic data for groups 1, 2, and 3 are shown in Tables 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Resting heart rates tended to be somewhat elevated. This was due to the stresses of having just been catheterized (arterial line) and the anticipation of heavy exercise.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.   QT and VO2 in group 1 


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3.   QT and VO2 in group 2 


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4.   QT and VO2 in group 3 

Group 1

QT as measured by the Fick principle for O2 ranged from 5.4 to 26.3 l/min (Table 2). There was a linear relationship between QT and VO2: QT = 4.71 VO2 + 5.63, r = 0.94 (Fig. 2A). To determine the appropriate methodology for calculation of QT by use of the C2H2 technique, C2H2-determined QT was calculated using different breath numbers for backextrapolation and then, for each choice, compared with the Fick method (Fig. 2B). Extrapolation to breath 1 minimized the difference between Fick measurements and the C2H2 measurements (Fig. 2C). With use of breath 1, QT, as measured by the C2H2 technique, ranged from 6.0 to 26.4 l/min. There was a linear relationship between C2H2-measured QT and VO2: QT = 4.71 VO2 + 5.60, r = 0.93 (Fig. 2A). There was no statistically significant difference between QT measurement by Fick and C2H2-nonrebreathing methods.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   A: relationship between QT and O2 uptake (VO2) in 3 subjects by direct Fick method and C2H2 method; good agreement is shown. B: regression lines for acetylene method using different breath numbers for backextrapolation (dotted lines) compared with that for the Fick method (solid line). C: residual sum of squares between QT by both methods in 3 subjects as a function of choice of breath number for backextrapolation. Backextrapolation to breath 1 is most appropriate choice throughout range from rest to maximal exercise.

Group 2

QT measured by C2H2 at rest and at 30, 60, and 90% of VO2 max ranged from 2.1 to 28.6 l/min, and there was again a linear relationship to VO2: QT = 7.13 VO2 + 2.35, r = 0.96 (Fig. 3, Table 3). Mixed venous PO2 predicted from C2H2-measured QT, measured VO2, and arterial O2 concentration was 35-40 Torr at rest and 20-25 Torr at 90% of VO2 max, further indicating that the method produces reasonable results.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Relationship between C2H2-determined QT and VO2 in group 2 (female cohort).

Group 3

In normoxic conditions, QT measured by C2H2 at rest and at 30, 60, and 90% of VO2 max ranged from 3.8 to 40.2 l/min, and there was a linear relationship to VO2: QT = 6.67 VO2 + 2.38, r = 0.97 (Table 4). In hypoxic conditions the range of measured QT was 5.1-40.1 l/min, and there was a linear relationship of QT to VO2: QT = 7.80 VO2 + 2.92, r = 0.97 (Fig. 4). Mixed venous PO2 predicted from QT, measured VO2, and arterial O2 concentration was 20-25 Torr at 90% of VO2 max (normoxia) and 10-15 Torr during 13% O2 breathing.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Relationships between C2H2-determined QT and VO2 in elite male cyclists (group 3) breathing air (normoxia) and hypoxic gas.

Data from female and male subjects at rest and at 90% of VO2 max gave a single linear relationship: QT = 6.75 VO2 + 2.38, r = 0.96 (Fig. 5).


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Relationship between C2H2-determined QT and VO2 at rest and at 90% of maximal VO2 in female and elite male cyclists. Same linear relationship of VO2 to QT is shown for both groups.

C2H2 Solubility Measurements

To determine its effect on the calculation of QT, lambda  was measured in all subjects. The equation for C2H2-determined QT given in METHODS shows that errors in lambda  produce equivalent (but opposite) percent errors in QT, so this aspect of the measurement of QT is important to consider. Analysis of measurements showed a mean lambda  of 0.830 ± 0.017 in 12 female subjects and 0.684 ± 0.065 in 12 male subjects. Repeated measurements in the same 12 female subjects at two different times 1 wk apart showed no significant difference in C2H2 solubility (P = 0.48).


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

This study has proposed and demonstrated the reasonableness of a nonrebreathing, C2H2 uptake approach to QT measurement in exercising normal human subjects.

Assumptions

Our methodology involves certain key assumptions that are necessary for QT to be measured accurately. These are the same as the assumptions required in the rebreathing method for QT measurement. First, we assume that alveolar and arterial C2H2 partial pressures are equal during the measurement of QT. Hlastala and Robertson (9) showed that in a normal lung with minor degrees of ventilation-perfusion (VA/Q) mismatch the alveolar-arterial difference for an inert gas of this solubility is minimal. This is particularly likely to be nonproblematic during exercise, when overall VA/Q is high. In addition, on a theoretical basis, inert gases, such as C2H2, are not diffusion limited. As such, in a subject with normal pulmonary function tests, the assumption is reasonable. However, the assumption that alveolar and arterial C2H2 are equal implies that the technique we have described cannot be used reliably for measurement of QT in subjects with significant VA/Q inequality.

Second, in the calculation of QT, we assume that mixed venous C2H2 concentration is zero. Although this is not true for the 25 breaths we use, we extrapolate the difference between inspired and alveolar C2H2 back to the breath at which venous C2H2 can be assumed to be zero. Inasmuch as our study was noninvasive, we were not able to directly measure the time necessary for recirculation when venous C2H2 would no longer be zero. Other studies in the literature have estimated this time period to be ~15 s (21). However, we used our measurement of QT by the direct Fick method compared with the C2H2 method (group 1) to estimate the breath at which our assumption would be valid. We determined alveolar C2H2 for different choices of breath numbers to which to extrapolate and then calculated the resultant QT. We then compared the regression of the relationship between VO2 and QT from the direct Fick method with the regression from the C2H2 method using different breath numbers (Fig. 2). The breath number that minimized the difference between the two methods was determined to be the appropriate choice for backextrapolation, and this was breath 1. In the backextrapolation to breath 1, the first four breaths are generally excluded in the regression analysis, as evident from Fig. 1B, where the first breath included is breath 5. This is because very rapid lung kinetics govern the washin of C2H2 during the first few breaths, whereas the much slower kinetics of body tissue C2H2 uptake and its effects on recirculation of C2H2 dictate the remaining breaths. Indeed, the first four breaths usually do not lie on the regression line that fits the remaining 20-25 breaths because of the different lung and tissue kinetics. Typical values of VE and QT during heavy exercise and of body tissue volumes indicate that four half times, or 94% of the transient response, take 4-8 s for lung equilibration; for the tissues the corresponding calculations show 94% response time in ~3 min. Because we are addressing the effects of recirculation by backextrapolation, discarding the first four breaths has an appropriate rationale.

Third, an important aspect to our methodology is that the lambda  for C2H2 is not assumed but, rather, is measured directly. The range of lambda  (0.596-0.910) between subjects (Fig. 6) is such that QT could be considerably in error when extreme values of lambda  occur. For example, if we used the overall mean value of 0.757 (n = 27), QT in the subject with the lowest measured solubility would have been 27% too low; similarly, in the subject with the highest measured solubility, QT would have been 13% too high. Reported values of C2H2 solubility range from 0.740 to 0.843 (5, 6, 20, 23). Jibelian et al. (12) showed that solubility varies directly with hematocrit and indirectly with temperature. However, our data show very weak correlation to Hb (r2 = 0.10) and hematocrit (r2 = 0.05), so an assumed value of lambda  correcting for the Hb level is not likely to be a good replacement for the actual value. As such, direct measurement in each individual at body temperature gives the most appropriate estimate of lambda  and is particularly important if individually accurate QT values are desired. However, if group mean QT values are desired, then individual lambda  values may be less important. Figure 6 shows the distribution of lambda  values for C2H2 in this study and supports the contention that this variable should be measured.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Frequency distribution of C2H2 blood-gas partition coefficients in all subjects. , Overall mean and mean ± 1 and 2 SD.

Finally, there was a delay of several weeks between C2H2 and Fick QT measurement in the three subjects of group 1. A maximum of 2 mo occurred between measurements. However, the subjects were competitive cyclists who maintained their fitness between studies and objectively had similar VO2 max on each occasion and at similar power outputs (Table 2). As such, we believe that the time lag is not of significance, and therefore the two methods can be compared.

Advantages of the Nonrebreathing Technique

Our nonrebreathing method of measuring QT by C2H2 uptake was designed principally to improve on previous rebreathing methods (4, 13, 16, 19, 21). Inasmuch as nonrebreathing and rebreathing involve uptake of an inert gas to measure pulmonary capillary blood flow and thus QT, the assumptions of the two techniques are identical. Nonrebreathing is preferable, especially at maximal exercise, for multiple reasons. First, nonrebreathing is favored by subjects, inasmuch as it is more comfortable, because there is no change in PAO2 or PACO2. At high work rates and at high altitudes, where inspired PO2 is already low, decreasing PAO2 or increasing PACO2 becomes even more intolerable. In addition, a fall in PAO2, as may occur with rebreathing, can serve as a stimulus for rapid changes in QT and VE via chemoreceptors, thus potentially causing a physiological alteration in QT. In our method, such changes are avoided, thus increasing the accuracy of the QT measurement.

Comparison with the Literature

Other methodologies for measuring QT have been published in the literature. Regression equations from the literature for the Fick method, the dye-dilution technique, and C2H2 rebreathing are presented in Table 5. We have compared our findings from groups 1 and 3 with studies performed on men and have compared findings from group 2 with the limited number of studies on women in the literature. Our method compares well with those previously measured and, in particular, with the standard for QT measurement, the Fick method.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5.   Comparison of regression equations (VO2 vs. QT) from literature with regression from groups 1, 2, and 3 

The method of Becklake et al. (3) published in 1962 uses N2O rather than C2H2 but is similar in principle. The major difference is that Becklake et al. argued that recirculation of C2H2 into the mixed venous blood was inconsequential; clearly, our data are in disagreement with their data (Fig. 1). Thus end-tidal C2H2 levels progressively rise throughout the entire data collection period because of such recirculation. This suggests that the assumptions of Becklake et al. on this matter are not always adequate, and this led us to develop the backextrapolation procedure to overcome the problem. The other difference from the work of Becklake et al. is that our data extend to extremely high QT values, essentially double those described by Becklake et al., as a result of studying elite athletes at maximal exercise.

Alveolar Ventilation

Our QT calculation relies on the use of alveolar ventilation and not total ventilation. This is represented in our equation as VE * (PECO2/PACO2). By convention, VE and alveolar ventilation are reported at body temperature saturated with water vapor at ambient pressure, i.e., BTPS. We therefore measure lambda  for C2H2 at BTPS conditions. Although it would also be acceptable to express alveolar ventilation as VCO2/PaCO2, VCO2 must be converted to BTPS units rather than remain at STPD. This is to remain compatible with how lambda  is measured. Conversion to BTPS is particularly important at altitude, inasmuch as the difference between STPD and BTPS values is greater in those conditions.

In summary, we have devised a nonrebreathing methodology based on short-term quasi-steady-state C2H2 uptake for the calculation of QT in exercising human subjects with normal lungs. The results are comparable to previously reported QT measurements. We believe this approach will be of particular value at heavy exercise and especially at altitude, where rebreathing methods may alter arterial PO2 and PCO2 and are also quite uncomfortable.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was funded by National Institutes of Health Grants HL-17731, M01 RR-00827, and HL-09624 and by the American Physiological Society Science Teacher Research Program.


    FOOTNOTES

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: P. D. Wagner, Div. of Physiology, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., MC 0623A, La Jolla, CA 92093-0623 (E-mail: pdwagner{at}ucsd.edu).

Received 22 March 1999; accepted in final form 7 June 1999.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1.   Astrand, P., T. E. Cuddy, B. Saltin, and J. Stenberg. Cardiac output during submaximal and maximal work. J. Appl. Physiol. 19: 268-274, 1964[Abstract/Free Full Text].

2.   Becklake, M. R., H. Frank, G. R. Dagenais, G. L. Ostiguy, and C. A. Guzman. Influence of age and sex on cardiac output. J. Appl. Physiol. 20: 938-947, 1965[Abstract/Free Full Text].

3.   Becklake, M. R., C. J. Varvis, L. D. Pengelly, S. Kenning, M. McGregor, and D. V. Bates. Measurement of pulmonary blood flow during exercise using nitrous oxide. J. Appl. Physiol. 17: 579-586, 1962[Abstract/Free Full Text].

4.   Cander, L., and R. E. Forster. Determination of pulmonary parenchymal tissue volume and pulmonary capillary flow in man. J. Appl. Physiol. 14: 541-551, 1959[Abstract/Free Full Text].

5.   Grollman, A. The determination of cardiac output of man by the use of acetylene. Am. J. Physiol. 88: 432-445, 1929.

6.   Grollman, A. The solubility of gases in blood and blood fluids. J. Biol. Chem. 82: 317-325, 1929[Free Full Text].

7.   Hermansen, L., B. Ekblom, and B. Saltin. Cardiac output during submaximal and maximal treadmill and bicycle exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 29: 82-86, 1970[Free Full Text].

8.   Higgs, B. E., M. Clode, G. J. McHardy, N. L. Jones, and E. J. Campbell. Changes in ventilation, gas exchange and circulation during exercise in normal subjects. Clin. Sci. (Colch.) 32: 329-337, 1967[Medline].

9.   Hlastala, M. P., and H. T. Robertson. Inert gas elimination characteristics of the normal and abnormal lung. J. Appl. Physiol. 44: 258-266, 1978[Free Full Text].

10.   Hopkins, S. R., T. P. Gavin, N. M. Siafakas, L. J. Haseler, I. M. Olfert, H. Wagner, and P. D. Wagner. Effect of prolonged heavy exercise on pulmonary gas exchange in athletes. J. Appl. Physiol. 85: 1523-1532, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

11.   Hossack, K. F., and R. A. Bruce. Maximal cardiac function in sedentary normal men and women: comparison of age-related changes. J. Appl. Physiol. 53: 799-804, 1982[Abstract/Free Full Text].

12.   Jibelian, G., R. R. Mitchell, and E. S. Overland. Influence of hematocrit and temperature on solubility of acetylene and dimethyl ether. J. Appl. Physiol. 51: 1357-1361, 1981[Abstract/Free Full Text].

13.   Johnson, R. L., W. C. Spicer, J. M. Bishop, and R. E. Forster. Pulmonary capillary blood volume, flow, and diffusing capacity during exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 15: 893-902, 1960[Abstract/Free Full Text].

14.   Kanstrup, I. L., and B. Ekblom. Influence of age and physical activity on central hemodynamics and lung function in active adults. J. Appl. Physiol. 45: 709-717, 1978[Abstract/Free Full Text].

15.   Krogh, A., and J. Lindhard. Measurement of the blood flow through the lungs of man. Scand. Arch. Physiol. 27: 100-125, 1912.

16.   Liu, Y., E. Menold, A. Dullenkopf, S. Reissnecker, W. Lormes, M. Lehman, and J. M. Steinacker. Validation of the acetylene rebreathing method for measurement of cardiac output at rest and during high-intensity exercise. Clin. Physiol. 17: 171-182, 1997[Medline].

17.   McDonough, J. R., and R. A. Danielson. Variability in cardiac output during exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 37: 579-583, 1974[Free Full Text].

18.  Rice, A. J., A. T. Thornton, C. J. Gore, G. C. Scroop, H. Greville, H. Wagner, P. D. Wagner, and S. R. Hopkins. Pulmonary gas exchange during exercise in highly trained cyclists with arterial hypoxemia. J. Appl. Physiol. In press.

19.   Smyth, R. J., N. Gledhill, A. B. Froese, and V. K. Jamnik. Validation of noninvasive maximal cardiac output measurement. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 16: 512-515, 1984[Medline].

20.   Taylor, H. L., and C. B. Chapman. In vitro and apparent in vivo solubility of acetylene (Abstract). Federation Proc. 9: 124, 1950.

21.   Triebwasser, J. H., R. L. Johnson, R. P. Burpo, J. C. Campbell, W. C. Reardon, and C. G. Blomqvist. Noninvasive determination of cardiac output by a modified acetylene rebreathing procedure utilizing mass spectrometer measurement. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 48: 203-209, 1977[Medline].

22.   Wagner, P. D., and F. A. Lopez. Techniques in the life sciences. P4/I. Gas chromatography techniques in respiratory physiology. Respir. Physiol. P403: 1-24, 1984.

23.   Wagner, P. D., F. P. Naumann, and B. R. Laravuso. Simultaneous measurement of eight foreign gases in blood by gas chromatography. J. Appl. Physiol. 36: 600-605, 1974[Free Full Text].


J APPL PHYSIOL 87(4):1506-1512
8570-7587/99 $5.00 Copyright © 1999 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
A. M. Jonk, I. P. van den Berg, I. M. Olfert, D. W. Wray, T. Arai, S. R. Hopkins, and P. D. Wagner
Effect of acetazolamide on pulmonary and muscle gas exchange during normoxic and hypoxic exercise
J. Physiol., March 15, 2007; 579(3): 909 - 921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
A. C. Henderson, D. L. Levin, S. R. Hopkins, I. M. Olfert, R. B. Buxton, and G. K. Prisk
Steep head-down tilt has persisting effects on the distribution of pulmonary blood flow
J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2006; 101(2): 583 - 589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
F. Lador, M. Azabji Kenfack, C. Moia, M. Cautero, D. R. Morel, C. Capelli, and G. Ferretti
Simultaneous determination of the kinetics of cardiac output, systemic O2 delivery, and lung O2 uptake at exercise onset in men
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2006; 290(4): R1071 - R1079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
I. M. Olfert, J. Balouch, A. Kleinsasser, A. Knapp, H. Wagner, P. D. Wagner, and S. R. Hopkins
Does gender affect human pulmonary gas exchange during exercise?
J. Physiol., June 1, 2004; 557(2): 529 - 541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
G. Laszlo
Respiratory measurements of cardiac output: from elegant idea to useful test
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2004; 96(2): 428 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. R. Hopkins, R. C. Barker, T. D. Brutsaert, T. P. Gavin, P. Entin, I. M. Olfert, S. Veisel, and P. D. Wagner
Pulmonary gas exchange during exercise in women: effects of exercise type and work increment
J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2000; 89(2): 721 - 730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
A. J. Rice, A. T. Thornton, C. J. Gore, G. C. Scroop, H. W. Greville, H. Wagner, P. D. Wagner, and S. R. Hopkins
Pulmonary gas exchange during exercise in highly trained cyclists with arterial hypoxemia
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 1999; 87(5): 1802 - 1812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barker, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barker, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, P. D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online