Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 87: 643-651, 1999;
8750-7587/99 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wetter, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Dempsey, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wetter, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Dempsey, J. A.
Vol. 87, Issue 2, 643-651, August 1999

Influence of respiratory muscle work on VO2 and leg blood flow during submaximal exercise

Thomas J. Wetter, Craig A. Harms, William B. Nelson, David F. Pegelow, and Jerome A. Dempsey

John Rankin Laboratory of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53705


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The work of breathing (Wb) normally incurred during maximal exercise not only requires substantial cardiac output and O2 consumption (VO2) but also causes vasoconstriction in locomotor muscles and compromises leg blood flow (Qleg). We wondered whether the Wb normally incurred during submaximal exercise would also reduce Qleg. Therefore, we investigated the effects of changing the Wb on Qleg via thermodilution in 10 healthy trained male cyclists [maximal VO2 (VO2 max) = 59 ± 9 ml · kg-1 · min-1] during repeated bouts of cycle exercise at work rates corresponding to 50 and 75% of VO2 max. Inspiratory muscle work was 1) reduced 40 ± 6% via a proportional-assist ventilator, 2) not manipulated (control), or 3) increased 61 ± 8% by addition of inspiratory resistive loads. Increasing the Wb during submaximal exercise caused VO2 to increase; decreasing the Wb was associated with lower VO2 (Delta VO2 = 0.12 and 0.21 l/min at 50 and 75% of VO2 max, respectively, for ~100% change in Wb). There were no significant changes in leg vascular resistance (LVR), norepinephrine spillover, arterial pressure, or Qleg when Wb was reduced or increased. Why are LVR, norepinephrine spillover, and Qleg influenced by the Wb at maximal but not submaximal exercise? We postulate that at submaximal work rates and ventilation rates the normal Wb required makes insufficient demands for VO2 and cardiac output to require any cardiovascular adjustment and is too small to activate sympathetic vasoconstrictor efferent output. Furthermore, even a 50-70% increase in Wb during submaximal exercise, as might be encountered in conditions where ventilation rates and/or inspiratory flow resistive forces are higher than normal, also does not elicit changes in LVR or Qleg.

blood flow distribution; sympathetic vasoconstriction; thermodilution; work of breathing


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

REDUCING THE WORK of breathing (Wb) at maximal exercise by unloading the respiratory muscles via proportional-assist ventilation (PAV) is associated with decreased leg vascular resistance (LVR) and increased leg blood flow (Qleg) and leg O2 consumption (VO2); loading respiratory muscles by adding inspiratory resistance has the opposite effect (7). This vasodilation of working limb vasculature when the respiratory muscles are unloaded at maximal exercise occurs despite a fall in cardiac output (CO), whereas respiratory muscle loading does not alter CO (8). Presumably, at maximal exercise, where further increases in CO are limited, a competition for blood flow among different skeletal muscle groups exists, such that respiratory muscle blood flow may increase at the expense of blood flow to working limb muscles. The important physiological message from these unloading experiments is that the Wb normally incurred during maximal exercise causes vasoconstriction in working leg muscles and decreases Qleg.

Our present study asked whether the Wb normally incurred during submaximal exercise would elicit significant changes in VO2, Qleg, and LVR. To this end, we used the thermodilution technique at two submaximal exercise intensities during control ventilation and unloading of the respiratory muscles to repeatedly measure Qleg.

There are many conditions where the Wb is increased during submaximal exercise in the healthy subject, such as with aging, prolonged exercise, or environmental hypoxia, and also in patients with lung or cardiovascular disease (4, 6, 11, 24). Therefore, we also increased Wb by adding inspiratory resistances during submaximal exercise to determine whether increased work of the respiratory muscles would elicit a vasoconstrictor influence on limb muscle vasculature under conditions where CO was not limited. These effects of unloading and loading the respiratory muscles during submaximal exercise are contrasted with the effects determined during maximal exercise.


    METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Subjects. Ten male cyclists (nonsmoking, competitive) with resting pulmonary function within normal limits were recruited to participate in the study. Informed consent was obtained in writing from each subject, and all procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Wisconsin-Madison. The physical characteristics of the subjects were as follows: age 29.7 ± 1.3 (SE) yr, height 182.7 ± 0.9 cm, weight 76.7 ± 2.5 kg, and maximal VO2 (VO2 max) 59.0 ± 8.8 ml · kg-1 · min-1.

Pressure and gas measurements. During all tests the raw data were recorded on an eight-channel Hewlett-Packard tape recorder, Gould chart recorder, and computer for subsequent analysis. Flow rates, esophageal pressure, VO2, and CO2 production were measured using equipment and techniques previously reported (2, 12). Wb was defined as the product of peak inspiratory esophageal pressure and breathing frequency. This measurement yielded results, when expressed as percentage of control values, similar to those from the integrated area of the pressure-tidal volume (VT) loop (7). This index of Wb was chosen over the previously used pressure-volume loop estimation, because hysteresis in some of the unloaded loops at these submaximal workloads made calculations of area difficult to interpret.

Inspiratory unloading and loading. A feedback-controlled PAV (Winnipeg) was used to reduce the work of the inspiratory muscles during exercise (26). Briefly, subjects breathed through a two-way low-resistance nonrebreathing valve (7200 series, Hans Rudolph) that was connected on the inspiratory side to the PAV. The PAV develops pressure in proportion to inspiratory airflow and volume, and the level of assist can be adjusted separately for volume assist and flow assist. During inspiration the PAV makes mouth pressure positive in proportion to flow, such that the proportional assist (unloading) of the respiratory muscles occurs throughout the inspiratory cycle. The amount of assist was set at a level at which each subject felt comfortable for each workload, as determined from practice sessions before testing. During practice and testing sessions, subjects were verbally coached to relax and permit the PAV to assist each inspiration as much as possible.

To increase inspiratory work during exercise, resistive loads consisting of mesh screens and rubber stoppers with various-sized orifices were added to the inspiratory side; these resulted in resistances of 3-10 cmH2 · l-1 · s at the flow rates generated during the cycle exercise. Resistances were selected for each individual and at each work rate and increased the Wb above control levels by 79 ± 9 and 58 ± 6% at 50 and 75% of VO2 max, respectively. In 7 of 10 subjects, slightly smaller resistive loads were applied during additional trials; these increased the Wb by 58 ± 16 and 37 ± 10% at 50 and 75% of VO2 max, respectively. Subjects participated in practice sessions to familiarize themselves with the inspiratory loads.

Qleg measurements. Qleg and leg VO2 were measured using the techniques previously reported (7). A 4.0-Fr catheter, 40 cm long, with 10 side ports, for cold saline infusion (Royal Flush II Nylon, Cook, Bloomington, IN) was introduced percutaneously into the right femoral vein 2 cm below the inguinal ligament and advanced ~7 cm toward the knee. A second identical catheter was advanced from near the same location proximally toward the heart ~8 cm into the same femoral vein. A thin (0.64-mm-diameter) Teflon-coated thermocouple (model IT-18, Physiotemp Instruments, Clifton, NJ) was inserted through this catheter, with the tip extending ~1 cm beyond the catheter. The placement of the catheter and thermocouple was checked at rest by infusion of 20 ml of saline to produce a 0.5°C deflection in blood temperature and was not changed between trials of exercise. Assumptions regarding this method have been discussed previously (7, 16). Qleg was calculated on the basis of thermal-balance principles described by Andersen and Saltin (3).

Subsequent to placement of the leg catheters, a 20-gauge arterial catheter (Arrow) was inserted percutaneously into the radial artery of the left arm under local 1% lidocaine anesthesia for arterial blood sampling. Leg VO2 was calculated as the product of radial arterial-femoral venous O2 content and Qleg (Fick equation). Qleg data and leg VO2 are presented as twice the calculated value to represent both exercising legs. The arterial-femoral venous O2 content was divided by arterial O2 content to give O2 extraction. LVR was calculated as the ratio of mean arterial pressure (MAP) to Qleg (1 leg).

Blood-gas measurements, blood pressure, and blood lactate. Samples (3-10 ml) of arterial and venous blood were drawn anaerobically over 10-20 s during each trial for measurement of PO2, PCO2, and pH with a blood-gas analyzer calibrated with tonometered blood (model ABL300, Radiometer) and measurement of O2 saturation and Hb with a CO-oximeter (model OSM 3, Radiometer). Blood gases were corrected for temperature changes during exercise by measurement with a thermocouple placed intranasally into the lower third of the esophageal lumen (model 6500, Mon-a-Therm) for arterial blood temperature and from the femoral thermocouple for venous temperature. Arterial and femoral venous blood pressures were measured with pressure transducers (model P10EZ, Ohmeda) attached to the respective arterial and venous lines. Blood lactate concentration was analyzed by means of a lactate analyzer (model 1500 Sport, Yellow Springs Instrument). Hematocrit was determined by microcentrifuge.

Norepinephrine spillover technique. Plasma epinephrine, norepinephrine (NE), and dopamine were determined by a high-pressure liquid chromatography method with electrochemical detection. The rate of spillover of NE into plasma was determined as previously reported using blood flow rates, hematocrit, the difference in NE concentration between femoral venous and arterial plasma, and the fractional extraction of epinephrine (22).

Experimental protocol. Each subject completed a progressive incremental VO2 max exercise test on a cycle ergometer, as previously described (7). The mean VO2 max was 59.0 ± 8.8 ml · kg-1 · min-1 (range 48-73 ml · kg-1 · min-1). From the VO2 max data, workloads for each subject were selected to elicit 50 and 75% of VO2 max.

On a separate day, after placement of the catheters and after a sufficient warm-up period, subjects completed two 15- to 20-min exercise bouts at 50% of VO2 max followed by two 15-min bouts at 75% of VO2 max. Each bout was separated by a rest period of ~10-15 min. During each fixed work rate (50 and 75% of VO2 max) three or four continuous 5-min periods of control (no ventilatory intervention), inspiratory resistive loading, or unloading were applied, with periods of control and loaded breathing combined in one bout and control and unloaded breathing combined in the other (the ventilatory interventions were randomized). Thereafter, in 7 of the 10 subjects, two additional exercise bouts at 50% of VO2 max were followed by two bouts at 75% of VO2 max. These trials were similar to those described above, except the inspiratory resistive load was decreased slightly during the period of loaded breathing in these later bouts. Within each 5-min period the sequence of measurements was as follows: Qleg at 2 min 45 s; blood sampling, esophageal, and femoral venous temperatures at 3 min 55 s; femoral venous pressure at 4 min 15 s; and a second Qleg at 4 min 35 s. All other measurements were recorded continuously; values reported and used for calculations (including arterial and esophageal pressures and VO2) were taken at the same time as the Qleg measurements.

Changes in VT were minimized during unloaded breathing trials via visual feedback from an oscilloscope marked at control VT levels, and changes in breathing frequency were minimized during loaded breathing trials via auditory feedback from a metronome set at control breathing frequency. This was done for all exercise bouts at 75% of VO2 max. During some of the bouts of unloaded and loaded breathing at 50% of VO2 max, subjects were allowed to self-select VT and breathing frequency to whatever felt comfortable. Aside from slight changes in breathing frequency and VT, this had no effect on the Wb, VO2, Qleg, or LVR; thus these trials were combined with the other unloaded and loaded breathing trials and analyzed together.

Statistical analysis. Relationships between Wb and the dependent variables under the three conditions, i.e., control, inspiratory muscle load, and inspiratory muscle unload at each of the two work rates (50 and 75% of VO2 max), were determined from simple linear regression. Separate one-way ANOVAs with repeated measures were used to determine treatment differences among group mean values across the three conditions within each exercise level. Tukey's post hoc analysis was used to determine where the differences existed. Significance was set at P < 0.05.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Figure 1 is a typical example of the multiple measurements made for Qleg, MAP, and LVR plotted vs. Wb in one subject at both submaximal work rates. Regression lines through the individual trials are also displayed. The total number of trials (trial = 2.5 min of leg cycling during which 1 Qleg measurement was made) for each subject was 25 ± 2 at 50% of VO2 max (range 16-28) and 20 ± 2 at 75% of VO2 max (range 12-24), and these were roughly divided as 1:4 unloaded, 1:2 control, and 1:4 loaded inspiration.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Relationship between work of breathing (Wb) and leg blood flow (Qleg), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and leg vascular resistance (LVR) at 50% of maximal O2 consumption (VO2 max; black-triangle) and 75% of VO2 max () in 1 subject. None of regression line slopes were significantly different from zero (P > 0.05).

Using the approach displayed in Fig. 1, we present our findings concerning the effects of changing the Wb on several variables of O2 transport by showing regression lines through the absolute values for each subject and indicating whether the slopes of these lines are significantly different from zero. In addition, the mean values of each variable for each of the three specific conditions (inspiratory unloading, control, or inspiratory loading) and for each work rate are presented in Tables 1 and 2.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Effect of increasing and decreasing Wb at 50% of VO2max on ventilation, O2 transport, VO2, and LVR


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.   Effect of increasing and decreasing Wb at 75% of VO2max on ventilation, O2 transport, VO2, and LVR

Wb and minute ventilation. Estimates of Wb using pressure-volume loops resulted in values of 98 and 219 J/min for the control trials at 50 and 75% of VO2 max, respectively (not shown). At both work rates, peak inspiratory esophageal pressures were significantly increased (less negative) with unloading and significantly decreased (more negative) with loading compared with control values. Inspiratory muscle unloading reduced Wb to 62 ± 8 and 58 ± 4% of control at 50 and 75% of VO2 max, respectively, whereas with the inspiratory resistive loads Wb was increased to 171 ± 10% of control at 50% of VO2 max and 151 ± 5% at 75% of VO2 max (Tables 1 and 2).

Minute ventilation was significantly higher for unloading and lower for loading than for control at both exercise intensities (Tables 1 and 2). This was due, in large part, to slight increases in VT for unloading and slight decreases in breathing frequency for loading. The ratio of inspiratory time to total time was significantly higher with loading than for control or with unloading at 50 and 75% of VO2 max.

Blood gases. During control conditions, arterial and femoral venous O2 saturations were 96.0 ± 0.1 and 25.1 ± 5.3% at 50% of VO2 max and 95.2 ± 0.3 and 17.9 ± 3.7% at 75% of VO2 max; arterial PO2 and PCO2 were 92.3 ± 2.0 and 39.4 ± 0.8 Torr at 50% of VO2 max and 88.0 ± 2.3 and 38.1 ± 1.2 Torr at 75% of VO2 max; arterial and femoral venous pH were 7.40 ± 0.01 and 7.30 ± 0.01 at 50% of VO2 max and 7.38 ± 0.01 and 7.26 ± 0.01 at 75% of VO2 max; arterial lactate was 1.34 ± 0.25 mM at 50% of VO2 max and 2.75 ± 0.49 mM at 75% of VO2 max. Arterial O2 content averaged 19.3 ml/dl at both work rates, whereas femoral venous O2 content was 5.0 ml/dl at 50% of VO2 max and decreased to 3.7 ml/dl at 75% of VO2 max. Arterial and femoral venous blood-gas values with the respiratory muscles loaded or unloaded did not differ from those during control.

Effect of Wb on total VO2. Figure 2 shows individual subject regression lines for total VO2 (VO2 tot) vs. Wb. At 50% of VO2 max, 5 of 10 subjects had a significant positive slope (P < 0.05). At 75% of VO2 max, 6 of 10 subjects had significant positive slopes. Combining the individual data revealed that, for a 100% change in Wb (the approximate difference between unloaded and loaded conditions), VO2 would change by 4.6 and 6.0% at 50 and 75% of VO2 max, respectively (P < 0.001).


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Regression lines for total O2 uptake (VO2 tot) vs. Wb for each individual. Solid thin lines, 75% of VO2 max; dashed thin lines, 50% of VO2 max; , data for 75% of VO2 max (means ± SE); , data for 50% of VO2 max (means ± SE). Six subjects had significant positive slopes at 75% of VO2 max (P = 0.015 to P < 0.001, r = 0.49-0.82). Five subjects had significant positive slopes at 50% of VO2 max (P = 0.023 to P < 0.001, r = 0.43-0.87). Total number of trials was 208 at 75% of VO2 max and 239 at 50% of VO2 max, and number of trials for each subject ranged from 12 to 28. If O2 uptake (VO2) is expressed as percentage of mean control VO2 for each subject and all data are combined, regression equation for 75% of VO2 max becomes VO2 tot (%control) = 0.060(Wb) + 92.76, r2 = 0.231, and slope is significant (P < 0.001), and regression equation for 50% of VO2 max becomes VO2 tot (%control) = 0.046(Wb) + 95.44, r2 = 0.173, and slope is significant (P < 0.001).

Effects of changing Wb on O2 transport. Qleg increased in all subjects from a mean of 11.5 l/min at 50% of VO2 max to 16.6 l/min at 75% of VO2 max (Tables 1 and 2). Figure 3 shows individual subject regression lines for Qleg vs. Wb. None of the slopes of these regressions were significant, although in two subjects at 75% of VO2 max the negative slopes approached significance (P <=  0.06). Mean Qleg data were not different between respiratory muscle loading conditions at 50% of VO2 max, but a trend for Qleg to decrease with increased Wb was evidenced by a significant decrease in Qleg (0.54 l/min, P < 0.05) for loaded vs. unloaded conditions at 75% of VO2 max (Table 2).


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Regression lines for Qleg vs. Wb for each individual. Solid thin lines, 75% of VO2 max; dashed thin lines, 50% of VO2 max; , data for 75% of VO2 max (means ± SE); , data for 50% of VO2 max (means ± SE). None of individual slopes were significant (P > 0.05). One subject was excluded because of unreasonably high Qleg values.

During control conditions, MAP increased from 104 to 109 mmHg with increasing exercise intensity. At each exercise intensity, mean values for MAP did not differ by >3 mmHg between respiratory muscle loading conditions (Tables 1 and 2). Several individuals showed slight decreases in MAP with increased Wb; these were always <= 5 mmHg (Fig. 4). Mean femoral venous pressure was increased 5-8% with unloading and reduced 4-7% with loading compared with control.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Regression lines for mean arterial pressure vs. Wb for each individual. Solid thin lines, 75% of VO2 max; dashed thin lines, 50% of VO2 max; , data for 75% of VO2 max (means ± SE); , data for 50% of VO2 max (means ± SE). Two of 10 subjects had significant negative slopes at 75% of VO2 max (P < 0.02, r = -0.67-0.71). Three subjects had significant negative slopes at 50% of VO2 max (P < 0.04, r = -0.40-0.58).

LVR at either exercise intensity did not differ with changes in Wb; there were no significant slopes for individual subjects at either work rate (Fig. 5); this was true whether MAP or (MAP - mean femoral venous pressure) was used in the calculation for LVR.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Regression lines for leg vascular resistance vs. Wb for each individual. Solid thin lines, 75% of VO2 max; dashed thin lines, 50% of VO2 max;  data for 75% of VO2 max (means ± SE); , data for 50% of VO2 max (means ± SE). None of individual slopes were significant (P > 0.05). One subject was excluded because of unreasonably high Qleg values.

Individual regressions for heart rate (HR) vs. Wb showed significant positive slopes for two subjects at 50% of VO2 max and for three subjects at 75% of VO2 max (1 subject had a significant negative slope at 75% of VO2 max). Mean HR was significantly higher (3 beats/min) for loaded than for unloaded and control ventilation at 50% of VO2 max, whereas at 75% of VO2 max the differences were not significant (Tables 1 and 2).

Given the small or absent changes in Qleg or arterial-femoral venous O2 content with changing Wb at either work rate, leg VO2 was also unchanged with changing Wb. An exception to this was found at 75% of VO2 max, where mean leg VO2 was significantly higher (0.10 l/min) with unloading than with loading (Table 2). By changing the Wb, leg VO2/VO2 tot ratio increased by 4-5% during respiratory muscle unloading and decreased by 4-5% during loading at both work rates (Tables 1 and 2).

Effect of Wb on NE spillover. NE spillover was significantly increased from 50 to 75% of VO2 max (P < 0.01 for control conditions, Tables 1 and 2). The increase averaged 91 ± 20% for individual subjects. There was wide variability in NE spillover between subjects, and there was no significant change with changes in Wb at either of the exercise intensities.

Comparison of data with change in Wb at maximal vs. submaximal exercise. Figure 6 shows the changes in VO2 tot, Qleg, LVR, and NE spillover vs. the absolute Wb for the two submaximal work rates (from the present study) and for maximal exercise (7). Comparing the control values obtained at maximal exercise with those at submaximal exercise reveals expected increases for VO2 tot and Qleg in response to increasing leg work rate. LVR was highest at 50% of VO2 max, fell substantially at 75% of VO2 max, and remained at this low level at maximal exercise. Similarly, NE spillover was lowest at 50% of VO2 max, increased at 75% of VO2 max, and remained near this level at maximal exercise.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Comparison of VO2 tot and Qleg (A) and leg vascular resistance and norepinephrine (NE) spillover (B) with absolute Wb at VO2 max, 75% of VO2 max, and 50% of VO2 max. VO2 max data are from Harms et al. (7). Wb for control values at 50 and 75% of VO2 max were estimated from pressure-volume loops (as was done for VO2 max values); Wb for unloaded and loaded values are based on percent change from control values as estimated by peak inspiratory esophageal pressure × breathing frequency. Five subjects did both studies (Ref. 7 and present study), and 2 others did maximal but not submaximal exercise study; fitness level of these 2 subjects was similar to that of additional 5 subjects who participated in submaximal study. * Significantly different from control (middle values), P < 0.05.

Note that the absolute Wb during the loaded trials at submaximal exercise was less than the Wb during control trials at maximal exercise. This occurred even though the relative increase in Wb with respiratory muscle loading (when expressed as a percentage of control Wb) was actually greater at submaximal exercise (150-170%) than at maximal exercise (128%). The major differences with changing the Wb at maximal vs. submaximal exercise are the greater absolute changes in Wb achieved at maximal exercise and the changes in LVR and NE spillover with unloading and loading respiratory muscles at maximal but not submaximal exercise.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Summary of findings. We used multiple trials of submaximal exercise and measurements of limb blood flow in 10 subjects to test the effects of changing the Wb on LVR, Qleg, and VO2 tot. Our findings at these submaximal exercise levels show that VO2 tot increased with increasing Wb and decreased with decreasing Wb; however, Qleg, LVR, and NE spillover did not change significantly with changing Wb. These findings at submaximal exercise intensities differ from those previously described at maximal exercise, where VO2 tot (and CO) and LVR were affected by changing Wb. We believe that the lack of effect of loading or unloading respiratory muscles on LVR at submaximal exercise is a consequence of too small a load placed on (or removed from) the cardiovascular system to disturb whatever variable(s) activate(s) the sympathetic nervous system to cause vasoconstriction in active locomotor muscle. Furthermore, the large effect of changing the Wb on LVR (and Qleg) during exercise at VO2 max is a consequence of the high O2 and blood flow demand of the respiratory muscles occurring at a time when total available blood flow is limited. The major physiological implication of the new findings at submaximal exercise is that the normal Wb incurred at moderate exercise intensities does not contribute to the tonic vasoconstrictor activity present in working leg muscles. Our findings also suggest that even substantial increases in Wb (at least in the range of 50-70% above normal) will raise whole body VO2 but do not cause alterations in LVR or Qleg during submaximal exercise.

Sensitivity of measurements. Our protocol involved making multiple Qleg measurements for each subject. Because we randomly assigned respiratory muscle load and unload conditions and analyzed within-bout measurements for trends, we are confident that the results are not obscured by time-dependent effects. Previously, at maximal exercise, we also used multiple exercise trials and measurements of Qleg and demonstrated an ability to detect systematic changes of <10% in Qleg that corresponded with changes in Wb, even on an individual-subject basis (7). The reproducibility of Qleg measurements within trials at VO2 max was very good [coefficient of variation (CV) ± 3.9%]. This reproducibility was comparable at 75% of VO2 max (CV ± 5.5% for Qleg measurements under control conditions) and was lower at 50% of VO2 max (CV ± 9.9%). Thus a relative mean change in Qleg over the range of the change in Wb similar to that seen at VO2 max (11%) would have been slightly more difficult to detect at the submaximal work rates.

Effect of changing Wb on VO2 tot. By increasing Wb at submaximal work rates (50 and 75% of VO2 max), we were able to show a relatively small but significant increase in VO2 tot; similarly, by reducing Wb via PAV, VO2 tot decreased compared with control. Although these changes in VO2 tot are relatively small, they are what would be predicted on the basis of previous measurements of the O2 cost of mimicking the mechanics and breathing pattern of exercise hyperpnea in normal subjects at rest (1). Given the regression equation developed by Aaron et al. (respiratory muscle VO2 = 0.081 + 0.001 × Wb, where Wb is measured from pressure-volume loops and is in J/min), we estimate from our measurements 1) that the total O2 cost of breathing at 50 and 75% of VO2 max is 0.18 and 0.30 l/min, respectively and 2) that the O2 cost of the change in the Wb between unloaded and loaded conditions is 0.11 l/min at 50% of VO2 max and 0.20 l/min at 75% of VO2 max. These latter estimates were nearly identical to the group mean VO2 tot differences of 0.12 and 0.21 l/min found in the current study. On the basis of this same equation, corresponding values at VO2 max were estimated to be 0.61 l/min for the total O2 cost of breathing during control conditions and a change in VO2 of 0.54 l/min over the range of Wb between unloaded and loaded breathing.

According to the Fick principle, changes in CO and/or arterial-mixed venous O2 difference would be responsible for the VO2 change with changing Wb during exercise. At maximal exercise, unloading resulted in a decreased stroke volume and CO (HR and arterial-mixed venous O2 difference did not change), which we associated with increases in inspiratory intrathoracic pressure (8). It is also likely during submaximal exercise that our observed decrease in VO2 corresponded with a decrease in CO. With respiratory muscle loading, CO (or VO2 tot) did not change at maximal exercise, probably because the limits of the pericardium had been reached (8). At submaximal exercise, loading did increase VO2, and it is likely that stroke volume and CO were also increased by the more negative intrathoracic pressures with loading.

Respiratory muscle work and changes in LVR. Why did adding and removing respiratory muscle work at maximal exercise cause changes in LVR, and why were these changes not seen during the current study at submaximal exercise? Our basic premise during maximal exercise was that the work and/or aerobic status of the respiratory muscles stimulated type III-IV afferents in the diaphragm and other respiratory muscles, which then caused reflex vasoconstriction of limb vasculature during control or loaded conditions and reflex vasodilation with respiratory muscle unloading (9). Indirect evidence in support of this postulate and a discussion of other possible mechanisms (i.e., baroreflexes) were presented previously (7).

Unloading the respiratory muscles. These unloading data are especially important, because they speak directly to the cardiovascular role of respiratory muscle work and/or intrathoracic pressure normally incurred at the various exercise intensities. Why did respiratory muscle unloading result in decreases in LVR at maximal but not submaximal exercise? One possibility is that, during submaximal exercise, tonic vasoconstrictor sympathetic nerve activity to locomotor muscles is not normally present (during control conditions), and thus there would be no activity to relieve with respiratory muscle unloading. This does not appear to be likely, since there is overwhelming evidence that tonic vasoconstrictor activity is present in leg vasculature during moderate exercise (20). Furthermore, in our experiment, under control exercise conditions, we observed a measurable level of NE spillover at 50% of VO2 max and a 63% increase in this mean level at 75% of VO2 max. In fact, at 75% of VO2 max the NE spillover approximated that at VO2 max. LVR followed similar trends, showing a decrease from 50 to 75% of VO2 max and comparable values at 75% of VO2 max and VO2 max. Accordingly, we would suggest that substantial sympathetic vasoconstrictor activity did indeed exist at these submaximal workloads, which potentially could have been relieved with respiratory muscle unloading. Therefore, we must conclude that in our healthy subjects the work of breathing normally incurred during these submaximal exercise intensities does not contribute to the vasoconstrictor tone present in working locomotor muscles.

Loading the respiratory muscles. Why did additional respiratory muscle loading result in increases in LVR at maximal but not submaximal exercise? Perhaps the load placed on the respiratory muscles at submaximal exercise was simply insufficient to cause a change. Although we did increase the Wb substantially (50-70%), the absolute increase in Wb was less than that achieved during maximal exercise. However, even had we increased the Wb to the same level attained during maximal exercise, it is likely that an increase in VO2 and CO that would enhance O2 transport to meet the increased metabolic requirements of the respiratory muscles would have occurred. This compensatory response at submaximal exercise is different from the case of maximal exercise, where increasing blood flow and O2 transport to meet the increased work of the respiratory muscles were not accomplished by an augmented CO (8). Thus, at maximal exercise, increased LVR and diversion of blood flow from working leg muscle was necessary. Our present experimental design did not provide a sufficiently large increase in Wb during submaximal exercise to distinguish between these possibilities.

Relevance of findings. Our findings are relevant to several conditions in which ventilatory work is increased during submaximal exercise. For example, in elderly fit men, ventilatory work is increased (relative to younger fit men) throughout exercise. This is due to an enhanced ventilatory response to compensate for increased dead space ventilation and possibly the presence of expiratory flow limitation (11). LVR is also increased and Qleg is decreased across a range (mild to heavy) of exercise intensities (17). Present findings would not predict that most of this decreased limb flow rate was attributable to increased Wb, at least at work rates up to 75% of VO2 max. We hasten to add that the nature of the increase in ventilatory work is quite different from our experimentally induced increases in Wb, which were purely increased inspiratory flow resistive work. The elderly have increased ventilation rates, expiratory flow limitation, relative hyperinflation, and increased elastic work, all of which may have some reflex influence on sympathetic nerve activity (5, 23).

Our data do not indicate that an abnormally high Wb during submaximal exercise will never influence LVR or Qleg. For example, in heart failure patients, exercise hyperpnea is enhanced and peripheral blood flow is reduced. Although a causal link between these two factors has not been established, they have been theoretically linked as parts of one underlying process (4). In the rat model with myocardial infarction, blood flow to the diaphragm is enhanced and limb muscle blood flow reduced during submaximal exercise (15). A similar scenario might occur with submaximal exercise in healthy subjects during short-term exposure to the hypoxia of high altitude, where, again, hyperventilation and increased ventilatory work are combined with a reduced CO at any given submaximal VO2 (24, 25). Another exceptional case in this regard may occur in prolonged exercise at fixed, heavy, submaximal work rates, where a time-dependent tachypnea, hyperventilation, expiratory flow limitation, and increased ventilatory work occur and where diaphragmatic fatigue is prevalent (10).

In summary, our present and past results would predict that the normally occurring Wb with increasing exercise intensity in healthy subjects at sea level would require a progressively greater portion of the increasing CO (and VO2) to be directed to respiratory muscles at all work rates; however, these effects of increasing ventilatory work on sympathetic vasoconstrictor outflow and on limb blood flow would not be realized until maximal or at least very near-maximal exercise intensities. Our present findings do not allow us to distinguish between increased ventilatory work per se and a limited blood flow distribution as the primary trigger for increased vasoconstrictor outflow to locomotor muscle.

Hierarchy of muscle blood flow distribution during exercise. Because the diaphragm and accessory respiratory muscles have a high oxidative capacity, their resistance vessels may be especially sensitive to local vasodilator influences (13, 14). The fact that decreases in Qleg were observed with addition of respiratory muscle work (7) but not with added arm work (18, 19, 22) was interpreted to mean that, at high-intensity exercise, a hierarchy may exist for blood flow distribution, with respiratory muscles ranking before leg and arm musculature (21). However, our present findings show that changing respiratory muscle work did not cause changes in LVR or Qleg during submaximal exercise. Accordingly, respiratory muscles may not rank above limb muscles in terms of vasodilatory sensitivity, and the reason for differences in previous findings may be more related to the different work intensities used and the limits to available CO imposed at VO2 max. A quite different type of hierarchy might exist among the different skeletal muscle vascular beds in terms of their relative propensity to produce and accumulate metabolic end products. The higher oxidative capacity and fatigue resistance of the diaphragm vs. leg vs. arm musculature may mean, thus, that the respiratory muscles must maintain a much higher work intensity before incurring sufficient metabolic acidosis to trigger sympathoexcitatory reflexes.

Of course, these suggestions are highly speculative. Given the present background of mostly descriptive data, we now need to reduce the complexity of our experimental paradigm and more thoroughly explore the type of mechanisms that might underlie these reflex vasoactive effects that arise when competition for blood flow occurs between groups of active skeletal muscles.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are indebted to Dr. Magdy Younes, who invented the proportional-assist ventilator and loaned us one of his prototypes to conduct this study. We also recognize the technical assistance provided by Claudette St. Croix, Kathy Henderson, Annie Gazdag, and Charles Dumke.


    FOOTNOTES

This research was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant RO1 HL-15469. T. J. Wetter and C. A. Harms were supported by a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute training grant.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. A. Dempsey, 504 N. Walnut, Madison, WI 53705 (E-mail: jdempsey{at}facstaff.wisc.edu).

Received 18 November 1998; accepted in final form 29 March 1999.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1.   Aaron, E. A., B. D. Johnson, C. K. Seow, and J. A. Dempsey. Oxygen cost of exercise hyperpnea: measurement. J. Appl. Physiol. 72: 1810-1817, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

2.   Aaron, E. A., K. C. Seow, and B. D. Johnson. Oxygen cost of exercise hyperpnea: implications for performance. J. Appl. Physiol. 72: 1818-1825, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

3.   Andersen, P., and B. Saltin. Maximal perfusion of skeletal muscle in man. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 366: 233-249, 1985[Abstract/Free Full Text].

4.   Clark, A. L., J. L. Sparrow, and A. J. Coats. Muscle fatigue and dyspnoea in chronic heart failure: two sides of the same coin? Eur. Heart J. 16: 49-52, 1995.

5.   Daly, M. De B. Interactions between respiration and circulation. In: Handbook of Physiology. The Respiratory System. Control of Breathing. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1986, sect. 3, vol. II, pt. 2, chapt. 16, p. 529-594.

6.   Hanson, P., A. Claremont, J. A. Dempsey, and W. Reddan. Determinants and consequences of ventilatory responses to competitive endurance running. J. Appl. Physiol. 52: 615-623, 1982[Abstract/Free Full Text].

7.   Harms, C. A., M. A. Babcock, S. R. McClaran, D. F. Pegelow, G. A. Nickele, W. B. Nelson, and J. A. Dempsey. Respiratory muscle work compromises leg blood flow during maximal exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 82: 1573-1583, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

8.   Harms, C. A., T. J. Wetter, S. R. McClaran, D. F. Pegelow, G. A. Nickele, W. B. Nelson, P. Hanson, and J. A. Dempsey. Effects of respiratory muscle work on cardiac output and its distribution during maximal exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 85: 609-618, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

9.   Hussain, S., A. Chatillon, A. Comtois, C. Roussos, and S. Magder. Chemical activation of thin fiber phrenic afferents. II. Cardiovascular responses. J. Appl. Physiol. 70: 77-86, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

10.   Johnson, B. D., M. A. Babcock, O. E. Suman, and J. A. Dempsey. Exercise-induced diaphragmatic fatigue in healthy humans. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 460: 385-405, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

11.   Johnson, B. D., M. S. Badr, and J. A. Dempsey. Impact of the aging pulmonary system on the response to exercise. Clin. Chest Med. 15: 229-246, 1994[Medline].

12.   Johnson, B. D., K. W. Saupe, and J. A. Dempsey. Mechanical constraints on exercise hyperpnea in endurance athletes. J. Appl. Physiol. 73: 874-886, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

13.   Laughlin, M. H., R. E. Klabunde, M. D. Delp, and R. B. Armstrong. Effects of dipyridamole on muscle blood flow in exercising miniature swine. Am. J. Physiol. 257 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 26): H1507-H1515, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

14.   Manohar, M. Vasodilator reserve in respiratory muscles during maximal exertion in ponies. J. Appl. Physiol. 60: 1571-1577, 1986[Abstract/Free Full Text].

15.   Musch, T. I. Elevated diaphragmatic blood flow during submaximal exercise in rats with chronic heart failure. Am. J. Physiol. 265 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 34): H1721-H1726, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

16.   Poole, D. C., G. A. Gaesser, M. C. Hogan, D. R. Knight, and P. D. Wagner. Pulmonary and leg VO2 during submaximal exercise: implications for muscular efficiency. J. Appl. Physiol. 72: 805-810, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

17.   Proctor, D. N., P. H. Shen, N. M. Dietz, T. J. Eickhoff, L. A. Lawler, E. J. Ebersold, D. L. Loeffler, and M. J. Joyner. Reduced leg blood flow during dynamic exercise in older endurance-trained men. J. Appl. Physiol. 85: 68-75, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

18.   Richardson, R. S., B. Kennedy, D. R. Knight, and P. D. Wagner. High muscle blood flows are not attenuated by recruitment of additional muscle mass. Am. J. Physiol. 269 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 38): H1545-H1552, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

19.   Richter, E. A., B. Kiens, M. Hargreaves, and M. Kjaer. Effect of arm-cranking on leg blood flow and noradrenaline spillover during leg exercise in man. Acta Physiol. Scand. 144: 9-14, 1992[Medline].

20.   Rowell, L. B., D. S. O'Leary, and D. L. Kellogg, Jr. Integration of cardiovascular control systems in dynamic exercise. In: Handbook of Physiology. Exercise: Regulation and Integration of Multiple Systems. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1996, sect. 12, pt. II, chapt. 17, p. 770- 838.

21.   Saltin, B., G. Radegran, M. D. Koskolou, and R. C. Roach. Skeletal muscle blood flow in humans and its regulation during exercise. Acta Physiol. Scand. 162: 421-436, 1998[Medline].

22.   Savard, G. K., E. A. Richter, S. Strange, B. Kiens, N. J. Christensen, and B. Saltin. Norepinephrine spillover from skeletal muscle during exercise in humans: role of muscle mass. Am. J. Physiol. 257 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 26): H1812-H1818, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

23.   Seals, D. R., N. O. Suwarno, and J. A. Dempsey. Influence of lung volume on sympathetic nerve discharge in normal humans. Circ. Res. 67: 130-141, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].

24.   Thoden, J. S., J. A. Dempsey, W. G. Reddan, M. L. Birnbaum, H. V. Forster, R. F. Grover, and J. Rankin. Ventilatory work during steady-state response to exercise. Federation Proc. 28: 1316-1321, 1969[Medline].

25.   Vogel, J. A., L. H. Hartley, J. C. Cruz, and R. P. Hogan. Cardiac output during exercise in sea-level residents at sea level and high altitude. J. Appl. Physiol. 36: 169-172, 1974[Free Full Text].

26.   Younes, M., A. Puddy, D. Roberts, R. B. Light, A. Quesada, K. Taylor, L. Oppenheimer, and H. Cramp. Proportional assist ventilation. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 145: 121-129, 1992[Medline].


J APPL PHYSIOL 87(2):643-651
8570-7587/99 $5.00 Copyright © 1999 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. Borghi-Silva, C. Carrascosa, C. C. Oliveira, A. C. Barroco, D. C. Berton, D. Vilaca, E. B. Lira-Filho, D. Ribeiro, L. E. Nery, and J. A. Neder
Effects of respiratory muscle unloading on leg muscle oxygenation and blood volume during high-intensity exercise in chronic heart failure
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2008; 294(6): H2465 - H2472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
G. R. Chiappa, B. T. Roseguini, P. J.C. Vieira, C. N. Alves, A. Tavares, E. R. Winkelmann, E. L. Ferlin, R. Stein, and J. P. Ribeiro
Inspiratory Muscle Training Improves Blood Flow to Resting and Exercising Limbs in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 29, 2008; 51(17): 1663 - 1671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
L. M. Romer and M. I. Polkey
Exercise-induced respiratory muscle fatigue: implications for performance
J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2008; 104(3): 879 - 888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
M. Amann, D. F. Pegelow, A. J. Jacques, and J. A. Dempsey
Inspiratory muscle work in acute hypoxia influences locomotor muscle fatigue and exercise performance of healthy humans
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): R2036 - R2045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
J. D. Witt, J. A. Guenette, J. L. Rupert, D. C. McKenzie, and A. W. Sheel
Inspiratory muscle training attenuates the human respiratory muscle metaboreflex
J. Physiol., November 1, 2007; 584(3): 1019 - 1028.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. D. Miller, C. A. Smith, S. J. Hemauer, and J. A. Dempsey
The effects of inspiratory intrathoracic pressure production on the cardiovascular response to submaximal exercise in health and chronic heart failure
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): H580 - H592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]