Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 87: 554-560, 1999;
8750-7587/99 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by de Troyer, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by de Troyer, A.
Vol. 87, Issue 2, 554-560, August 1999

Muscle kinematics for minimal work of breathing

Theodore A. Wilson1, Maurizio Angelillo2, Alexandre Legrand3, and André de Troyer3

1 Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455; 2 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Salerno, 84084 Salerno, Italy; and 3 Laboratory of Cardiorespiratory Physiology, Brussels School of Medicine, 1070 Brussels, Belgium


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MODELING AND ANALYSIS
EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

A mathematical model was analyzed to obtain a quantitative and testable representation of the long-standing hypothesis that the respiratory muscles drive the chest wall along the trajectory for which the work of breathing is minimal. The respiratory system was modeled as a linear elastic system that can be expanded either by pressure applied at the airway opening (passive inflation) or by active forces in respiratory muscles (active inflation). The work of active expansion was calculated, and the distribution of muscle forces that produces a given lung expansion with minimal work was computed. The calculated expression for muscle force is complicated, but the corresponding kinematics of muscle shortening is simple: active inspiratory muscles shorten more during active inflation than during passive inflation, and the ratio of active to passive shortening is the same for all active muscles. In addition, the ratio of the minimal work done by respiratory muscles during active inflation to work required for passive inflation is the same as the ratio of active to passive muscle shortening. The minimal-work hypothesis was tested by measurement of the passive and active shortening of the internal intercostal muscles in the parasternal region of two interspaces in five supine anesthetized dogs. Fractional changes in muscle length were measured by sonomicrometry during passive inflation, during quiet breathing, and during forceful inspiratory efforts against a closed airway. Active muscle shortening during quiet breathing was, on average, 70% greater than passive shortening, but it was only weakly correlated with passive shortening. Active shortening inferred from the data for more forceful inspiratory efforts was ~40% greater than passive shortening and was highly correlated with passive shortening. These data support the hypothesis that, during forceful inspiratory efforts, muscle activation is coordinated so as to expand the chest wall with minimal work.

chest wall; mechanics; intercostal muscles


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MODELING AND ANALYSIS
EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

THE EQUILIBRIUM CONFIGURATION of an elastic structure is the configuration, consistent with any constraints, for which the elastic stored energy is minimal. It appears that Agostoni et al. (1) were the first to apply this concept to the chest wall and to point out that the configuration of the chest wall during the relaxation maneuver was the configuration with minimal elastic energy for a given lung volume. Mead (13) later stated that "In terms of minimal elastic work for a given volume change, inspiration should proceed along the relaxation characteristic, for to depart from the characteristic would require additional work of distortion." The volume displacements of the abdomen and rib cage during quiet breathing in seated subjects were found to match those for the relaxation maneuver quite well (8). Thus, on the scale of the two-compartment description of chest wall shape, these data seemed to confirm the minimal-work hypothesis. However, at a finer scale, both Agostoni et al. (1) and Konno and Mead (9) observed differences between the shape of the chest wall during active inspiration and the shape of the relaxed chest wall at the same volume, and both tried to estimate the energy of the distortions they observed. Since then, others have added to the list of observed differences between active and passive chest wall shapes (5).

Mead's statement, above, is widely taken as a hypothesis that the inspiratory muscles drive the chest wall along the minimal-work trajectory, and differences between the active and passive chest wall shapes are taken as evidence that the hypothesis has limited validity. However, Konno and Mead (9) commented that "it would be remarkable, indeed, if the muscles, which by definition must act from within, would produce just the configuration obtained by a uniform pressure difference applied from without." Thus differences between active and passive chest wall trajectories may be the result of the limited repertoire of the respiratory muscles. Although the active trajectory may not be identical to the passive trajectory, it may be the trajectory, among those available to the muscles, for which the work of breathing is minimal. This paper addresses that possibility.

The chest wall is modeled as a linear elastic system that can be expanded by airway pressure and active muscle forces. The set of muscle forces that produces a given volume expansion with minimal work is computed. This computation yields equations that relate muscle force to the elastic properties of the system. Unfortunately, it would be impractical to measure the elastic properties of the chest wall in the detail that would be required to calculate muscle force from these equations, and it would be difficult to measure the force in an active muscle and test these predictions. However, the computation also yields expressions for muscle shortening, and these are very simple. For minimal work, the fractional shortening of all active muscles is a common factor times their fractional shortening during passive inflation. If the muscles can reproduce the relaxation trajectory, the factor is 1, and active shortening equals passive shortening. If not, the factor is >1, and active shortening is greater than passive shortening.

This prediction was tested by measuring the fractional shortening of the parasternal intercostal muscles in supine dogs. Muscle length was measured during passive inflation, during quiet breathing, and during more forceful inspiratory efforts against an occluded airway. Active shortening during quiet breathing was found to be loosely correlated with passive shortening, but active shortening during forceful efforts was closely correlated with passive shortening. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that, during forceful efforts, the inspiratory muscles drive the chest wall along the minimal-work trajectory.


    MODELING AND ANALYSIS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MODELING AND ANALYSIS
EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We will begin with a simple schematic example and then go on to the general analysis. The simple example is shown in Fig. 1. It consists of three horizontal bars, representing ribs, connected by pins to a vertical bar at the left. The vertical bar can slide along the wall, and it is connected to the foundation by a spring, with spring constant ks. At their right ends, the bars are connected to each other and to the foundation above by springs with spring constants k1, k2, and k3. The container at the lower right represents the lungs. The volume of the container (lung volume or VL) changes by means of the displacement of the piston with area A. The piston is connected to the lowest rib by a rigid bar and to the foundation by a spring with spring constant kL. Diagonal elements, labeled T1 and T2, represent intercostal muscles. These elements have negligible passive elastance, but they can generate active tension.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Schematic model of ribs and intercostal muscles. Volume (lung volume or VL) of the container can be expanded either by pressure P applied at the opening or by active tensions (T1 and T2) in the muscles that lie diagonally between the horizontal levers. For volume expansion by pressure at the opening (passive inflation), the piston with area A moves upward; the right ends of the levers move up with displacements x1, x2, and x3; and the springs with spring constants k1, k2, and k3 are compressed; but no force is transmitted through the levers, and the sliding bar on the left does not move. kL, Lung constant. For volume expansion by active muscle force (active inflation), sliding bar moves downward, with displacement xs, and spring with spring constant ks is extended as VL increases. The downward displacement of the bar is analogous to the caudal displacement of the sternum reported by De Troyer and Kelly (5).

The system can be passively displaced by pressure P at the opening of the container or actively displaced by tension in the muscles (T1 and T2). With passive inflation, the piston moves upward, and the pressure force is balanced by tension in spring kL and compression in spring k3. Because these springs are aligned, the springs exert no moments. The right ends of the ribs move upward, but no force is transmitted to the slide at the left, and it remains stationary. For active inflation, the muscles exert moments that must be balanced by forces at both ends of the ribs, and the slide moves downward. In this system, the muscles cannot reproduce the passive chest wall shape.

The equations of equilibrium for the levers and sliding bar can be solved to obtain the displacements that are produced by pressure or muscle tension. For simplicity, the spring constants for all springs are taken to be equal and are denoted k. The equation that describes the effects of pressure P and muscle tension on VL is
V<SC>l</SC> = <FR><NU>3</NU><DE>4</DE></FR> (<IT>A</IT><SUP>2</SUP>/<IT>k</IT>)P + <FR><NU>3</NU><DE>16</DE></FR> <FENCE><IT>A</IT><FENCE><RAD><RCD>2</RCD></RAD><IT>k</IT></FENCE> T<SUB>1</SUB> + <FR><NU>1</NU><DE>4</DE></FR> <FENCE><IT>A</IT><FENCE><RAD><RCD>2</RCD></RAD><IT>k</IT></FENCE> T<SUB>2</SUB></FENCE></FENCE> (1)
From similar equations that describe the displacements of the bars, equations that describe the shortening of the two muscles (S1 and S2) can be obtained. They are
<IT>S</IT><SUB>1</SUB> = <FR><NU>3</NU><DE>16</DE></FR> <FENCE><IT>A</IT><FENCE><RAD><RCD>2</RCD></RAD><IT>k</IT></FENCE>P + <FENCE><FR><NU>15</NU><DE>128</DE></FR> <IT>k</IT></FENCE> T<SUB>1</SUB> + <FENCE><FR><NU>1</NU><DE>32</DE></FR> <IT>k</IT></FENCE> T<SUB>2</SUB></FENCE> (2)
<IT>S</IT><SUB>2</SUB> = <FR><NU>1</NU><DE>4</DE></FR> <FENCE><IT>A</IT><FENCE><RAD><RCD>2</RCD></RAD><IT>k</IT></FENCE>P + <FENCE><FR><NU>1</NU><DE>32</DE></FR> <IT>k</IT></FENCE> T<SUB>1</SUB> + <FENCE><FR><NU>3</NU><DE>32</DE></FR> <IT>k</IT></FENCE> T<SUB>2</SUB></FENCE> (3)
For any generalized force (F), the conjugate displacement x is the displacement for which the incremental work (dW) equals Fdx. The variable VL is the conjugate displacement for P, and the displacements S1 and S2 are the conjugate displacements for T1 and T2. Thus
dW = P dV<SC>l</SC> + T<SUB>1</SUB> d<IT>S</IT><SUB>1</SUB> + T<SUB>2</SUB> d<IT>S</IT><SUB>2</SUB> (4)
For conjugate displacements, the relations between displacements and forces have a special property; the matrix of coefficients is symmetric. Therefore, the matrix of coefficients in Eqs. 1-3 is symmetric. That is, the coefficient of T1 in Eq. 1 is equal to the coefficient of P in Eq. 2, and so forth.

The objective is to compare muscle shortening (S) for passive inflation of the model lung and for active inflation with minimal work. For passive inflation, T1 = T2 = 0, and the relationships between the displacements and pressure are described by the first terms on the right sides of Eqs. 1-3. The first equation can be used to eliminate P from the second two and to obtain the following relations between passive muscle shortening (Sp) and VL.
<IT>S</IT><SUP>p</SUP><SUB>1</SUB> = <FR><NU>1</NU><DE>4</DE></FR> <FENCE>1<FENCE><RAD><RCD>2</RCD></RAD><IT>A</IT></FENCE> V<SC>l</SC></FENCE>
<IT>S</IT><SUP>p</SUP><SUB>2</SUB> = <FR><NU>1</NU><DE>3</DE></FR> <FENCE>1<FENCE><RAD><RCD>2</RCD></RAD><IT>A</IT></FENCE> V<SC>l</SC></FENCE> (5)

For T1 = T2 = 0, W = 1/2 P VL, and substituting for P yields the expression for passive work (Wp)
W<SUP>p</SUP> = <FR><NU>2</NU><DE>3</DE></FR> (<IT>k</IT>/<IT>A</IT><SUP>2</SUP>)V<SC>l</SC><SUP>2</SUP> (6)
Next, muscle tensions for volume expansion with minimal work are calculated. For P = 0, work (W) is given by the expression
W = <FR><NU>1</NU><DE>2</DE></FR> (T<SUB>1</SUB><IT>S</IT><SUB>1</SUB> + T<SUB>2</SUB><IT>S</IT><SUB>2</SUB>) (7)
By substituting for S1 and S2 from Eqs. 2 and 3, W is obtained as a quadratic function of the T values. Minimizing this, with the constraint that VL is fixed, yields values of T1 and T2. Substituting these into Eqs. 2 and 3 yields the following expressions for active shortening (Sa) and active work (Wa)
<IT>S</IT><SUP>a</SUP><SUB>1</SUB> = <FR><NU>1</NU><DE>4</DE></FR> <FENCE><FR><NU>41</NU><DE>21</DE></FR></FENCE> <FENCE>1<FENCE><RAD><RCD>2</RCD></RAD><IT>A</IT></FENCE>V<SC>l</SC></FENCE>
<IT>S</IT><SUP>a</SUP><SUB>2</SUB> = <FR><NU>1</NU><DE>3</DE></FR> <FENCE><FR><NU>41</NU><DE>21</DE></FR></FENCE> <FENCE>1<FENCE><RAD><RCD>2</RCD></RAD><IT>A</IT></FENCE>V<SC>l</SC></FENCE> (8)
W<SUP>a</SUP> = <FR><NU>2</NU><DE>3</DE></FR> <FENCE><FR><NU>41</NU><DE>21</DE></FR></FENCE> (<IT>k</IT>/<IT>A</IT><SUP>2</SUP>) V<SC>l</SC><SUP>2</SUP> (9)

The minimal active work solution has the following remarkably simple features. The ratio of active shortening to passive shortening is the same for both muscles, and the ratio of active work to passive work is the same as the ratio of active to passive shortening.

The example can be generalized to any multiple-degree-of-freedom linear elastic system. The relations between displacements and forces are generalized to
V<SC>l</SC> = Crs P + <LIM><OP>∑</OP><LL><IT>i</IT></LL></LIM> <IT>b<SUB>i</SUB></IT>T<SUB><IT>i</IT></SUB> (10)
<IT>S<SUB>i</SUB></IT> = <IT>b<SUB>i</SUB></IT> P + <LIM><OP>∑</OP><LL><IT>j</IT></LL></LIM> <IT>C</IT><SUB><IT>i j</IT></SUB>T<SUB><IT>j</IT></SUB> (11)
Here, the volume displacement is treated separately in Eq. 10. The coefficient of P on the right side of that equation is denoted Crs because this coefficient describes the compliance of the respiratory system. The other terms on the right side of Eq. 10 describe the effect of muscle tension on VL. Muscle tensions are denoted Ti for i = 1 to n. The coefficients that describe the volume change per unit force in each muscle are denoted bi. Only muscles with inspiratory effect are included in the set, and the values of bi are all positive. The remaining n equations describe the dependence of shortening (Si) of the ith muscle on P and Tj. The coefficients Ci j are components of an n × n matrix C. The component Ci j describes the effect of tension in the jth muscle on length of the ith muscle. The displacements have been chosen as conjugates of the forces, and, therefore, the matrix of coefficients is symmetric. That is, the coefficient of Ti in Eq. 10 and the coefficient of P in Eq. 11 for Si are equal, and the matrix C is a symmetric matrix.

For passive inflation
<IT>S</IT><SUP>p</SUP><SUB><IT>i</IT></SUB> = (<IT>b<SUB>i</SUB></IT>/Crs)V<SC>l</SC>
W<SUP>p</SUP> = <FR><NU>1</NU><DE>2</DE></FR> (1/Crs) V<SC>l</SC><SUP>2</SUP> (12)
Next, the forces for active inflation with minimal work are calculated. By substituting the expressions for Si in the expression for W, the following quadratic function of the T values is obtained
W = <FR><NU>1</NU><DE>2</DE></FR> <FENCE><LIM><OP>∑</OP><LL><IT>i</IT>,<IT>j</IT></LL></LIM> <IT>C</IT><SUB><IT>i j</IT></SUB>T<SUB><IT>i</IT></SUB>T<SUB><IT>j</IT></SUB></FENCE> (13)
We seek the values of Ti that minimize W for a given VL. The condition on volume is expressed by Eq. 10 with P = 0; namely
V = <LIM><OP>∑</OP><LL><IT>i</IT></LL></LIM> <IT>b<SUB>i</SUB></IT>T<SUB><IT>i</IT></SUB>
A Lagrange multiplier (lambda ) is introduced, and the function
<IT>f</IT> = W + &lgr; <FENCE>V<SC>l</SC> − <LIM><OP>∑</OP><LL><IT>i</IT></LL></LIM> <IT>b</IT><SUB><IT>i</IT></SUB>T<SUB><IT>i</IT></SUB></FENCE>
is minimized with respect to Ti. The partial derivatives of f with respect to Ti are set equal to zero to obtain the following equations
<LIM><OP>∑</OP><LL><IT>j</IT></LL></LIM> <IT>C</IT><SUB><IT>i j</IT></SUB>T<SUB><IT>j</IT></SUB> − &lgr;<IT>b</IT><SUB><IT>i</IT></SUB> = 0 (14)
Explicit formulas for Ti are obtained by multiplying Eq. 14 by the inverse of C, denoted as C-1
T<SUB><IT>i</IT></SUB> = &lgr; <LIM><OP>∑</OP><LL><IT>j</IT></LL></LIM> <IT>C</IT><SUP>−1</SUP><SUB><IT>i j</IT></SUB><IT>b<SUB>j</SUB></IT> (15)
This expression is substituted into Eq. 10 to obtain lambda  
&lgr; = V<SC>l</SC>/&agr; (16)
where
&agr; = <LIM><OP>∑</OP><LL><IT>i</IT>,<IT>j</IT></LL></LIM> <IT>b<SUB>i</SUB>C</IT><SUP>−1</SUP><SUB><IT>i j</IT></SUB><IT>b</IT><SUB><IT>j</IT></SUB>
Equations 15 and 16 constitute a formal solution to the problem. However, to evaluate Ti from these equations, the values of bi and the values of all components of the compliance matrix C must be known. That is, the values of bi that describe the inspiratory effect per unit force must be known for all muscles, and the values of Ci j that describe interaction between all muscles must be known. This seems impractical. However, by substituting P = 0 and the expressions for Ti and lambda , given by Eqs. 15 and 16, into the equation for Si (Eq. 11), the following simple expression for Sai is obtained
<IT>S</IT><SUP>a</SUP><SUB><IT>i</IT></SUB> = (<IT>b<SUB>i</SUB></IT> /&agr;)V<SC>l</SC> (17)
For minimal work, shortening of each active muscle is proportional to bi, as it is for passive shortening, and by comparing Eq. 17 with the first part of Eq. 12, it can be seen that the ratio of active to passive shortening is (Crs/alpha ), the same for all active muscles.

The ratio of active to passive shortening is Crs/alpha where
&agr; = <LIM><OP>∑</OP><LL><IT>i</IT>,<IT>j</IT></LL></LIM> <IT>b<SUB>i</SUB>C</IT><SUP>−1</SUP><SUB><IT>i j</IT></SUB><IT>b</IT><SUB><IT>j</IT></SUB>
For a stable system, the matrix of coefficients in Eqs. 10 and 11 is positive definite, and it follows from this that
<LIM><OP>∑</OP><LL><IT>i</IT>,<IT>j</IT></LL></LIM> <IT>b<SUB>i</SUB>C</IT><SUP>−1</SUP><SUB><IT>i j</IT></SUB><IT>b<SUB>j</SUB></IT> < Crs
Thus, in the minimal-work solution, all active muscles shorten by a common multiple of their passive shortening, and that multiple is >1.

The expression for Ti (Eq. 15) can also be substituted into the expression for work (Eq. 13) to obtain the following expression for the work done during active volume expansion
W<SUP>a</SUP> = <FR><NU>1</NU><DE>2</DE></FR> (1/&agr;)V<SC>l</SC><SUP>2</SUP> (18)
By comparing this equation with the second part of Eq. 12, it can be seen that the ratio of active to passive work is Crs/alpha , the same as the ratio of active to passive muscle shortening.


    EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MODELING AND ANALYSIS
EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The experiments were carried out in five adult mongrel dogs (17-32 kg) anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (initial dose, 25 mg/kg iv). The animals were placed in the supine posture and intubated with a cuffed endotracheal tube. A venous cannula was inserted to give maintenance doses of anesthetic. The rib cage and intercostal muscles were then exposed on the right side of the chest from the second to seventh rib by deflection of the skin and the underlying muscle layers.

The changes in parasternal intercostal muscle length were assessed by sonomicrometry (Triton Technology, San Diego, CA). This technique has previously been described in detail (3, 4). The fascia overlying the parasternal intercostal in two interspaces between the second and the fifth was carefully resected, and in each muscle thus exposed, a pair of piezoelectric crystals was inserted 6- to 11-mm apart in a well-identified muscle bundle in the vicinity of the sternum. The crystals, 1 mm in diameter, were oriented along the long axis of the muscle fibers and held in place with purse-string sutures. Airflow at the endotracheal tube was also measured in each animal with a heated Fleisch pneumotachograph connected to a Validyne differential pressure transducer (±2 cmH2O), and volume was obtained by integration of the flow signal. Airway opening pressure (Pao) was measured with another Validyne differential pressure transducer connected to a side port of the endotracheal tube.

After instrumentation, 30 min were allowed to elapse for recovery, after which tidal volume and changes in parasternal intercostal muscle length were measured during resting breathing. Two runs were recorded over 30 min. A Hans-Rudolph valve was then attached to the pneumotachograph and the tracheal tube, and the inspiratory line of the valve was blocked during the expiratory pause for seven consecutive inspiratory efforts. Data were recorded during two successions of occluded breaths separated by a 10- to 15-min period of unimpeded breathing. The animal was then given an injection of atracurium besylate (0.3-0.5 mg/kg iv), and the relaxation length (Lr) of the two parasternal intercostal muscles was determined. The animal was connected to a calibrated syringe, and muscle length was measured as the lungs were passively inflated with 100-ml volume increments up to 1 liter above FRC. Three trials were obtained in each animal.

The changes in parasternal intercostal muscle length during unimpeded breathing were averaged over 10 consecutive breaths from each run and expressed as percent changes relative to Lr. These changes were then divided by tidal volume and expressed as percent Lr per liter increase in VL.

During inspiratory efforts against an occluded airway, VL does not change, and the data for this maneuver must be interpreted to obtain values for muscle shortening that can be compared with passive shortening. Equivalent values of active shortening per liter were obtained from the data for the occluded airway maneuver by the following procedure. It was assumed that the fractional change in length (delta L) is the sum of the effects of changes of VL and Pao, as described by the equation
&dgr;<IT>L</IT> = <IT>a</IT>Crs Pao + <IT>b</IT>(V<SC>l</SC> − Crs Pao) (19)
The constants a and b in this equation can be interpreted as follows. During passive inflation, Crs Pao= VL, and the second term in this equation is zero. Thus the coefficient a describes the delta L per liter increase in VL during passive inflation. During spontaneous breathing with the airway open, Pao = 0, and the equation reduces to delta L = b VL. Thus the coefficient b describes the delta L per unit increase in VL. During inspiratory effort against an occluded airway, VL = 0, and delta L and Pao both change. Equation 19 is used to obtain a value of b from the measured values of delta L and Pao. That is, Eq. 19, with VL=0, is solved for b to obtain the relation
<IT>b</IT> = <IT>a</IT> − &dgr;<IT>L</IT>/Crs Pao (20)
The values of a and Crs were obtained from the data for passive inflation. The values of delta L and Pao for the fifth and seventh occluded efforts were averaged, and these were substituted into Eq. 20 to obtain b, the equivalent muscle shortening per liter increase in VL for the occluded airway maneuver.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MODELING AND ANALYSIS
EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In agreement with previous studies (3, 4), the parasternal intercostal muscles in the five animals shortened both during quiet, unimpeded inspiration and during occluded inspiratory efforts. The values of inspiratory length change per liter increase in VL during quiet inspiration, however, were variable among the different animals. This is shown in Fig. 2, in which the individual values of fractional muscle shortening per liter increase in VL during resting breathing are plotted against the corresponding values during passive inflation. Three of the 10 muscles shortened less during active inspiration than during passive inflation, but seven muscles shortened more during active inspiration. The line, fit to all data points, has a slope of 1.7 ± 0.3, with r2 = 0.36. 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Active fractional muscle shortening during quiet breathing vs. passive shortening of the parasternal intercostal muscles in 2 interspaces in dogs 1-5. Dashed line, line of identity; solid line, linear fit to all data.

The individual values of parasternal intercostal shortening per liter increase in VL, inferred from the data obtained during occluded breaths, are plotted against values of shortening during passive inflation in Fig. 3. For this maneuver, active shortening was greater than passive shortening for all muscles, and active shortening was more closely correlated with passive shortening. The line fit to the data has a slope of 1.4 ± 0.1, with r2 = 0.67. 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Active vs. passive muscle shortening for forceful inspiratory efforts against an occluded airway in dogs 1-5. Symbols are same as in Fig. 2.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MODELING AND ANALYSIS
EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Modeling and analysis. We have modeled the respiratory system as a linear elastic system, and this entails some approximations. First, displacement is assumed to be proportional to force, and the relation between displacement and force is assumed to be independent of rate of displacement or displacement history. Thus the 15-20% hysteresis in the pressure-volume loops of the respiratory system has been neglected. Second, nonlinear effects are neglected, although there clearly are limits on the magnitudes of chest wall displacements for which the linear approximation is accurate. However, this model has advantages that compensate for these approximations. In particular, the matrix of coefficients is symmetric in the relation between displacement and force for this model. The symmetry of the matrix of coefficients follows directly from the assumption that forces and displacements are linearly related; no additional assumptions are required.

The assumptions of the model and the symmetry of the matrix of coefficients that follows from these assumptions have been tested. Legrand et al. (12) have demonstrated, to an accuracy within 10%, that the inspiratory effects of intercostal muscles are additive, as is assumed in the linear model. In addition, Wilson and De Troyer (15) have used this model and the equality between the coefficent of P in the equations for Si and the coefficient of Ti in the equation for VL to predict the respiratory effect of intercostal muscles from data on their passive shortening. De Troyer and colleagues have tested the predictions for several intercostal muscles (6, 7, 10) and found that the measured respiratory effects match the predictions.

The modeling of muscle forces should also be discussed. First, muscle tension Ti represents only the active component of muscle force. Muscles also carry passive tension, but, in this model, passive tension is included with the other passive elastic forces that provide the elastic properties of the system, described by the coefficients bi and Ci j.

The forces and displacements for minimal work of chest wall expansion were calculated from the model. Three features of the minimal-work solution are the most significant.

1) The work of chest wall expansion by active muscle forces is greater than or equal to the work of expansion by pressure forces. The equilibrium configuration of the passive chest wall is the configuration with minimal stored elastic energy for a given volume. Therefore, the work of expansion by pressure is the minimal work that can produce a given volume displacement, and the work of expansion by active muscle forces cannot be smaller than this minimum. For the work of active expansion to equal the minimum, the chest wall must be driven along the same trajectory as the trajectory for the relaxation maneuver. However, the minimal-energy trajectory may not be available to the muscles for at least two reasons. First, muscles exert forces at points and in directions that are different from those of pressure forces. As a result, the displacements that are produced by muscle forces may be different from those produced by pressure. One example of this kind of distortion is the caudal displacement of the sternum during active breathing in dogs (5). Second, pleural pressure increases during passive inflation and decreases during active inspiration, and the blood volume in the thoracic cavity responds to these pressure changes; blood volume decreases during passive inflation but increases during active inspiration (14). As a result, the total volume expansion of the rib cage and abdomen is larger during active inspiration than during passive inflation.

2) The ratio of active to passive shortening is the same for all active muscles. Although the forces that are exerted by the muscles in the minimal-work maneuver depend on the detailed elastic properties of the system, the resulting kinematics of muscle shortening is simple and general: all active muscles shorten by more than their passive shortening, and the ratio of active to passive shortening is the same for all active muscles.

3) The ratio of active to passive work is the same as the ratio of active to passive shortening of active muscles. It would be difficult to determine the forces that cause all of the distortions of the chest wall during active breathing and to compute the work of distortion in detail. The analysis provides a simple expression for the total work done by the muscles. The ratio of active work for the minimal-work maneuver to passive work is the same as the ratio of active to passive shortening. Thus, if the minimal-work hypothesis is valid, the ratio of active to passive work of chest wall expansion can be obtained by measuring the ratio of active to passive muscle shortening.

Experimental results. The ratio of active shortening during quiet breathing-to-passive shortening is quite variable, as shown in Fig. 2. The deviations from the mean ratio of active to passive shortening ranged up to ~20% per liter or ~10% per tidal volume. Previous studies have shown that the variability in active parasternal shortening among animals is large (3, 4). One of us (A. De Troyer) has observed, in dogs, that during quiet breathing, the relative expansion of the rib cage and abdomen is quite variable, and this is a source of variability in active parasternal shortening. In addition, the ratio of active to passive shortening of parasternal intercostals in different interspaces in individual dogs is also variable. The dogs were anesthetized and studied in an unphysiological posture, and these conditions may have distorted the relation between active and passive shortening. We must conclude, however, that during quiet breathing, when the work of breathing is small, the pattern of muscle shortening deviates significantly from the pattern for minimal work.

During inspiratory efforts against an occluded airway, all muscles shortened; therefore, the ratios of active to passive shortening per liter that were inferred from these data are all >1. As shown in Fig. 3, active shortening during these more forceful inspiratory efforts is fairly closely correlated with passive shortening. Most of the deviation from a common ratio of active to passive shortening is due to one muscle. If this aberrant point is omitted from the set, the slope of the fit is 1.28 ± 0.04, with r2 = 0.89. We conclude that active parasternal shortening during forceful efforts is well described by the minimal-work hypothesis.

Conclusions. Chest wall distortion has been described in different terms by different investigators. These terms include compartmental volume, cross-sectional shape of the thorax, and relative displacements of ribs and sternum. The functional significance of these descriptors has been difficult to evaluate. Here we propose a new description of chest wall distortion: the ratio of active to passive shortening of active muscles. The modeling and analysis show that this measure of chest wall distortion is closely related to the work of chest wall distortion and provides a method for testing the long-standing hypothesis that the respiratory muscles drive the chest wall along the minimal-work trajectory. The analysis shows that the minimal-work trajectory available to the muscles may be different from the passive trajectory, but it has a testable characteristic: all active muscles shorten by the same multiple of their passive shortening. For this trajectory, the work of chest wall expansion is the same multiple of the work of passive expansion.

We have tested the minimal-work hypothesis for the parasternal intercostal muscles of the dog. The data for quiet breathing show a correlation between active and passive muscle shortening, but they also show considerable variability around the predicted relation. The data for more forceful efforts show a much tighter agreement with the prediction. Although the data cover a range of passive shortening, they were limited to a particular set of inspiratory muscles (the parasternal intercostals in the second to fourth interspaces). However, in the accompanying article (2), active and passive shortening in a different inspiratory muscle, the diaphragm, is reported, and the results are much like those for the parasternals. That is, active muscle shortening during quiet breathing is weakly correlated with passive shortening, but active shortening during forceful efforts is closely correlated with passive shortening. In addition, for forceful efforts, the ratio of active to passive shortening for the diaphragm is about the same as that for the parasternals. Thus, for forceful efforts, the pattern of muscle shortening for both groups is consistent with the minimal-work hypothesis, and we can invoke the further result of the analysis and conclude that the work of active chest wall expansion in dogs is ~35% greater than is the work of passive expansion.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant HL-45545.


    FOOTNOTES

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: T. A. Wilson, 107 Akerman Hall, 110 Union St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 (E-mail: wilson{at}aem.umn.edu).

Received 29 July 1998; accepted in final form 12 April 1999.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MODELING AND ANALYSIS
EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1.   Agostoni, E., P. Mognoni, G. Torri, and A. Agostoni. Static features of the passive rib cage and abdomen-diaphragm. J. Appl. Physiol. 20: 1187-1193, 1965[Abstract/Free Full Text].

2.   Boriek, A. M., J. R. Rodarte, and T. A. Wilson. Rates of active to passive muscle shortening in the canine diaphragm. J. Appl. Physiol. 87: 561-566, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

3.   De Troyer, A. The electro-mechanical response of canine inspiratory intercostal muscles to increased resistance: the cranial rib-cage. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 451: 445-461, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

4.   De Troyer, A., G. A. Farkas, and V. Ninane. Mechanics of the parasternal intercostals during occluded breaths in dogs. J. Appl. Physiol. 64: 1546-1553, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].

5.   De Troyer, A., and S. Kelly. Chest wall mechanics in dogs with acute diaphragm paralysis. J. Appl. Physiol. 53: 373-379, 1982[Abstract/Free Full Text].

6.   De Troyer, A., and A. Legrand. Mechanical advantage of the canine triangularis sterni muscle. J. Appl. Physiol. 84: 562-568, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

7.   De Troyer, A., A. Legrand, and T. A. Wilson. Rostrocaudal gradient of mechanical advantage in the parasternal intercostal muscles of the dog. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 495: 239-246, 1996[Medline].

8.   Konno, K., and J. Mead. Measurement of the separate volume changes of rib cage and abdomen during breathing. J. Appl. Physiol. 22: 407-422, 1967[Free Full Text].

9.   Konno, K., and J. Mead. Static volume-pressure characteristics of the rib cage and abdomen. J. Appl. Physiol. 24: 544-548, 1968[Free Full Text].

10.   Legrand, A., V. Ninane, and A. De Troyer. Mechanical advantage of sternomastoid and scalene muscles in dogs. J. Appl. Physiol. 82: 1517-1522, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

11.   Legrand, A., T. A. Wilson, and A. De Troyer. Mediolateral gradient of mechanical advantage in the canine parasternal intercostals. J. Appl. Physiol. 80: 2097-2101, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

12.   Legrand, A., T. A. Wilson, and A. De Troyer. Rib cage muscle interaction in airway pressure generation. J. Appl. Physiol. 85: 198-203, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

13.   Mead, J. Mechanics of the chest wall. In: Loaded Breathing, edited by L. D. Pengelly, A. S. Rebuck, and E. J. M. Campbell. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1974, p. 35-49.

14.   Warner, D. O., S. Krayer, K. Rehder, and E. L. Ritman. Chest wall motion during spontaneous breathing and mechanical ventilation in dogs. J. Appl. Physiol. 66: 1179-1189, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

15.   Wilson, T. A., and A. De Troyer. Effect of respiratory muscle tension on lung volume. J. Appl. Physiol. 73: 2283-2288, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].


J APPL PHYSIOL 87(2):554-560
8570-7587/99 $5.00 Copyright © 1999 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. L. Johnson Jr., C. C. W. Hsia, S.-I. Takeda, J. L. Wait, and R. W. Glenny
Efficient design of the diaphragm: distribution of blood flow relative to mechanical advantage
J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2002; 93(3): 925 - 930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
A. M. Boriek, J. R. Rodarte, and T. A. Wilson
Ratio of active to passive muscle shortening in the canine diaphragm
J Appl Physiol, August 1, 1999; 87(2): 561 - 566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by de Troyer, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by de Troyer, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online