Vol. 87, Issue 1, 142-151, July 1999
Influence of nitric oxide on vascular resistance and muscle
mechanics during tetanic contractions in situ
Bill T.
Ameredes and
Mark A.
Provenzano
Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, and Division of
Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of
Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261
 |
ABSTRACT |
Studies of
the effect of nitric oxide (NO) synthesis inhibition were performed in
the isometrically contracting blood-perfused canine
gastrocnemius-plantaris muscle group. Muscle blood flow (
) was controlled with a pump during continuous NO
blockade produced with either 1 mM
L-argininosuccinic acid
(L-ArgSA) or NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester
(L-NAME) during repetitive
tetanic contractions (50-Hz trains, 200-ms duration, 1/s). Pump
was set to match maximal spontaneous
(1.3-1.4
ml · min
1 · g
1)
measured in prior, brief (3-5 min) control contraction trials in
each muscle. Active tension and oxygen uptake were 500-600 g/g and
200-230
µl · min
1 · g
1,
respectively, under these conditions. Within 3 min of
L-ArgSA infusion, vascular
resistance across the muscle
(Rv) increased significantly
(from ~100 to 300 peripheral resistance units;
P < 0.05), whereas
Rv increased to a lesser extent
with L-NAME (from ~100 to 175 peripheral resistance units; P < 0.05). The increase in Rv with
L-ArgSA was unchanged by
simultaneous infusion of 0.5-10 mM
L-arginine but was reduced with
1-3 µg/ml sodium nitroprusside (41-54%). The increase in
Rv with
L-NAME was reversed with 1 mM of
L-arginine. Increased fatigue
occurred with infusion of
L-ArgSA; active tension and
intramuscular pressure decreased by 62 and 66%, whereas passive
tension and baseline intramuscular pressure increased by 80 and 30%,
respectively. These data indicate a possible role for NO in the control
of Rv and contractility within the canine gastrocnemius-plantaris muscle during repetitive tetanic contractions.
canine; endothelium-derived relaxation factor; fatigue; gastrocnemius muscle; hyperemia; intramuscular pressure; passive
tension
 |
INTRODUCTION |
THE MECHANICAL PERFORMANCE of skeletal muscle during
repetitive contractions can be indicative of the match between the
metabolic demands of the muscle fibers and the supply of substrate (2, 3) and/or metabolite washout (7). The active hyperemic response of
contracting muscle is one mechanism that enables high levels of
mechanical output over prolonged periods of time, through provision of
this supply and washout, during repetitive muscle activation such as
exercise. One agent that may play a role in the hyperemic process is
the endothelium-derived relaxing factor, presently identified as nitric
oxide (NO) (29). NO has been shown to be synthesized in the endothelial
cells lining the vasculature, through the activity of a constitutive
nitric oxide synthase (NOS) enzyme that acts to produce NO from the
precursor L-arginine (28). Once
produced, NO acts directly on the vascular smooth muscle to cause
relaxation, and there is an attendant drop in resistance as the vessel
luminal diameter increases. With respect to skeletal muscle
vasculature, it has been shown that the effects of the NO pathway are
significant in muscles with a high percentage of oxidative fibers (17),
specifically those characterized as slow-oxidative and fast-oxidative glycolytic.
The stimuli that may initiate this response within the muscle
vasculature include elevated intravascular shear forces produced by
increased flow of blood within the vessels (29) and extravascular shear
forces produced by repeated compression of the vessels within the
contracting muscle (21), perhaps as a product of intramuscular pressure
(PIM) development (4). Evidence
for this latter possibility has been demonstrated in rhythmically
squeezed rabbit arterial segments that produced elevated cGMP levels in
platelets circulating through the segments as an index of NO production
(21). Furthermore, a recent study in the canine gastrocnemius-plantaris
(GP) muscle has shown production of high intramuscular stress (
1,600
mmHg) during brief tetanic muscle contractions in situ (4), suggesting the propensity for development of large extravascular shear forces acting on the endothelium of the muscle vasculature in this muscle group.
However, studies in several different species and models have produced
varied results and a lack of consensus on whether NO plays a
significant role in the active hyperemic response (8, 11, 12, 14,
17-19, 21, 27, 30, 34). We believe that three major factors have
been responsible for this discrepancy. One is that twitch or low-demand
contractions have been utilized in many studies (8, 12, 19, 34), which
may not adequately test the capacity of the response (2, 14). Another
has been pretreatment with a systemic bolus of competitive NOS
inhibitors (19, 30), which may complicate interpretation of results in the contracting muscle vascular bed because of unquantifiable metabolism and sequestration in nonmuscle tissue beds throughout the
body. Finally, in some studies, the administered NOS inhibitor effective dose obtained in the resting state was not increased proportionately to account for the increased blood flow during muscle
contractions (12, 34). Consideration of these factors suggests that the
minimal role reported for NO requires further examination, based on the
facts that shear stress is a known strong potentiator of NO production
by endothelial cells (29) and deendothelialization of the GP muscle
vessels results in significantly attenuated hyperemic responses (27).
Furthermore, the fiber type composition of the canine GP muscle is
highly oxidative (45% fast-twitch fatigue resistant, 55% slow-twitch
fatigue resistant; Ref. 22), which might predispose it toward
significant NO-dependent responses (17).
Thus the purpose of this study was to determine whether NO plays a
significant role in control of vascular resistance
(Rv) during repetitive tetanic
contractions in the canine GP muscle in situ with the use of a
previously published contraction paradigm that reliably results in
achievement of high PIM
development, blood flow, and oxygen uptake
(
O2) (2-4, 10). We
hypothesized that inhibition of NO production through local
administration of blockers would result in significantly increased
Rv, if NO played a significant
role in this response under these conditions. Rejection of the
hypothesis would indicate that even these high-intensity contractions
have no effect on the NO system within the canine GP muscle
vasculature, suggesting regulation of the resistance response by other,
non-NO-related factors.
 |
METHODS |
General methods.
Mongrel dogs of both sexes (10-15 kg), obtained and housed in
accordance with the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Animal Care
and Use Committee, were utilized in these studies. Initial anesthesia
was induced with pentobarbital sodium (30 mg/kg iv), followed by
maintenance doses of 60 mg. The animals were ventilated through an
endotracheal tube with a Harvard respirator, and end-tidal CO2 was maintained at
4.5-5%. Body and muscle temperatures were maintained at
37-39°C. The muscle group studied was the GP with isolated
circulation surgically prepared as described previously (2-4, 10).
Anticoagulation of the blood was achieved with heparin (2,600 U/kg).
The sciatic nerve was dissected and cut, and the distal stump placed in
an electrode holder. The calcaneus tendon was freed, cut, and clamped,
and the muscle was anchored as described previously (2-4, 10).
Muscle blood flow (
) was measured as the rate of
venous outflow from the popliteal vein with the use of a 4-mm
cannulating-type electromagnetic flow probe. A pressure transducer
connected to the venous outflow line provided measurements of mean
venous pressure (MVP). A roller pump, fed by the
contralateral femoral artery, provided control of
during the infusion experiments, and a pump bypass line allowed
spontaneous perfusion of the muscle directly from this artery when
necessary. A pressure transducer connected to the popliteal artery
catheter (between the pump and the muscle) provided measurement of the
mean arterial pressure (MAP) and allowed calculation of resistance
across the muscle (Rv)
as
|
(1)
|
in
peripheral resistance units (PRU = mmHg/
), with
expressed in
ml · min
1 · g
wet wt
1.
O2 was determined in 10 GP
muscles. Blood samples (1 ml) for gas analysis were withdrawn
simultaneously into glass tuberculin syringes from a side port of the
arterial supply tubing and the venous effluent tubing. Oxygen
concentration of arterial
([O2]a) and venous effluent
([O2]v)
samples was measured by the manometric method of Van Slyke and Neill
(33). Samples were taken with the muscle at rest and during repetitive
contractions. Additional samples (
1 ml) were withdrawn for blood-gas
analyses by using a microanalyzer at 37°C (ABL-3, Radiometer) to
determine PO2, PCO2, and pH. A small portion of this
arterial sample was also used to measure hematocrit.
O2 was calculated by the Fick method as
|
(2)
|
Because
of the complexity of these experiments and the necessity for small
timing windows of drug infusion described in Contracting muscle
protocol and experiments, samples were not drawn for every series
performed. However, as shown in Table 2, these
O2 determinations provided
evidence that high metabolic rates were attained during the repetitive
isometric tetanic contractions at optimal muscle length
(Lo).
Muscle mechanics.
Muscle force development during contractions was monitored with a
pneumatic lever specifically designed for the canine GP muscle (13).
The force transducer on the lever was calibrated by hanging known
weights onto the tendon clamp attachment hook, with the lever
perpendicular to the floor. During setup of the lever, precautions were
taken to minimize flexing and movement of the apparatus with subsequent
tetanic contractions (3, 4). Repetitive isometric tetanic contractions
(50 imp/s, 0.2-ms pulse width × 4-V pulse amplitude; 200-ms train
duration, 1 contraction/s) were produced at
Lo, which was
determined as the length at which tension of prior twitch contractions
(0.2-ms pulse, 4 V) was maximal (102 ± 9 g/g,
n = 8 muscles). The activation
stimulus train resulted in peak tetanic active tension
(Tact) development of 540 ± 59 g/g (n = 8) and a twitch/tetanic
ratio of 0.19 ± 0.01. The tetanic contraction repetition rate was
chosen as one that reliably results in high
and
O2 in this preparation (2,
3, 10). Passive tension (Tpass)
at Lo was 55 ± 10 g/g. During contraction trials, the
Tpass baseline was monitored as an
index of incomplete relaxation to determine whether manipulations of NO
produced measurable alterations under these conditions.
In some experiments, PIM was
measured during contractions by using a solid-state needle-type
transducer (model SPR-477, Millar) inserted directly into the muscle.
The approach was the same as described previously (4), with
PIM being measured in the origin, central, and insertion portions of the medial head of the GP muscle group (zones I, II, and III). The
PIM transducer was calibrated with
a mercury column (4). As above, alterations in the passive PIM baseline were monitored as an
index of significant pressure remaining within the muscle between contractions.
Resting muscle experiments.
Just before the tests of resting muscle responses, muscles were
stimulated to produce repetitive isometric tetanic contractions (1/s),
over a period of 3-5 min, to allow determination of the contraction-induced level of hyperemia and decrement in
Rv with no drugs. A systemic
indomethacin bolus (0.5 mg/kg iv) was given immediately after the brief
contraction trial to block contribution of prostaglandins in the
response during the subsequent NO synthesis
blockade (18, 23). This dose was chosen based on pilot experiments
(n = 2) that indicated that a 5 mg/kg
systemic dose resulted in elevation of MAP to a level that was
considered nonphysiological (
200 mmHg), whereas 0.5 mg/kg produced
only mild elevation of MAP to 120-140 mmHg. This treatment may
have produced less than a total blockade of prostaglandin synthesis but
was considered reasonable with regard to the normal range of systemic MAP.
Toward the end of a subsequent 30-min rest period, the pump-perfusion
setup was installed, and
was monitored in the
pump-bypass mode to verify that spontaneous resting values were
reachieved. This rest period has been shown to allow
and
O2
to reestablish precontraction values after a brief repetitive
contraction trial (3). Muscle perfusion was then switched to pump
control, matching the
at rest previously measured,
and NO agonists ACh and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) were infused at
constant rates with the use of the syringe pumps connected to side
ports. These agonists provided the ability to test the
endothelial-dependent and -independent responses, respectively (18).
The syringe pump rate was always set at 10% of the roller pump rate;
these rates were typically 1-2 and 10-12 ml/min,
respectively. In separate experiments, NO antagonists were also infused
at a constant rate, as above. All concentrations of drug in syringes
and pump flows were chosen to achieve a desired concentration of drug
within the blood delivered to the muscle, typically expressed in
millimoles of drug per liter of blood. Two NO synthesis blockers were
chosen for these experiments. NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester
(L-NAME; Sigma Chemical), a
synthetic, competitive, reversible blocker of NO synthesis, was chosen
for its ease of solubility in normal isotonic saline and because it has
been used in prior twitch contraction studies in this (19) and other in
situ preparations (18).
L-Argininosuccinic acid (L-ArgSA; Sigma Chemical), a
naturally occurring compound, was chosen as a noncompetitive,
irreversible inhibitor of NO synthesis (15, 18). In all of the above
resting muscle experiments, agonists or antagonists were each infused
continuously for 10-20 min (time defined by achievement of a
sustained plateau), interspersed with 20- to 30-min recovery periods.
Contracting muscle protocol and experiments.
L-NAME and
L-ArgSA dose-response
experiments performed during repetitive tetanic contractions followed
the same approach outlined in Resting muscle
experiments, except that the
achieved during the brief preinfusion contraction trial was used as the
perfusion pump set point for
during the
contractions. As above, the syringe pump flow rate was 10% of the
roller pump rate, typically 5-6 and 50-60 ml/min,
respectively, and drug doses and flows were chosen to achieve
concentrations of millimoles of drug per liter of blood within the
blood delivered to the muscle. In all experiments, during the
preinfusion trial with spontaneous
,
Rv in the resting muscle and
during subsequent contractions averaged ~500 and 100 PRU
(P < 0.05), respectively,
demonstrating a significant drop in resistance with induction of the
active hyperemic response. The high resting
Rv level was always reestablished
during the rest period between the preinfusion and infusion trials,
suggesting a robust autoregulatory response. Beginning at
minute 3 of contractions under
subsequent pump perfusion control,
L-NAME or
L-ArgSA was constantly infused
from the syringe pumps. This time was chosen because prior tetanic
contraction experiments in this preparation have shown that maximal
and
O2
occur from 3 to 5 min of repetitive contractions with the use of this
stimulus paradigm (2, 3, 10). Respective NOS inhibitor dosages were
increased at 3- to 5-min intervals during the remainder of the
contraction trials.
A separate series of competitive experiments was performed in which
agonists were infused simultaneously with antagonists during muscle
contractions. Muscles were infused continuously with blocker, beginning
at minute 3 of contractions, under
pump perfusion control with NO agonists being added sequentially over time as contractions continued. The noncompetitive blockade property of
L-ArgSA was tested against 0.5, 1.0, 10, and 120 mM L-arginine (Sigma Chemical), the precursor for NO produced by endothelial NOS (28,
29). ACh was not used as an agonist for a complete series, because
preliminary experiments indicated that, although effective at lowering
Rv, even low doses reduced
contraction force by two-thirds to three-fourths of the ongoing level,
which we judged as unacceptable for comparison with the other
experiments. Thus a series was performed with 1.0 mM
L-ArgSA vs. 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and
3.0 µg/ml SNP. In these experiments, an additional null agonist
dosage of saline alone was infused to determine the effect of the
agonist vehicle during these experiments. Accordingly, in a separate
set of GP muscles, a series of time-control
L-ArgSA infusion experiments was
performed during repetitive contractions to determine time-based
effects of continuous blockade with 1 mM
L-ArgSA. Finally, a series of
L-NAME vs.
L-arginine experiments was
conducted to test Rv responses
with this competitive antagonist-agonist pair with the use of similar dosages.
After the trials were finished, the animals were killed with an
overdose of pentobarbital sodium. The nonstimulated GP muscle was
excised, trimmed of connective tissue and fat, and weighed (2-4,
10) for normalization of all measured values, expressed per whole
muscle wet weight (40-60 g). Repeated-measures ANOVAs (SigmaStat)
were performed on Rv values to
determine whether significant differences
(P < 0.05) were present. Post hoc
analyses of specific values were performed by using Duncan's test.
Independent sample t-tests were
performed to compare the L-ArgSA
time-control, L-ArgSA vs.
L-arginine, and
L-ArgSA vs. SNP
Rv data, also with
P < 0.05 considered significant.
 |
RESULTS |
Cardiovascular characteristics of the dogs were similar to those
obtained in prior experiments that used this preparation (systemic
arterial pH = 7.38 ± 0.11, arterial
PO2 = 104 ± 16 Torr, arterial
PCO2 = 35 ± 4 Torr) (2, 3). No
significant changes were noted in any of these arterial variables throughout the experiments; therefore, all animals were considered to
be similar with regard to systemic oxygenation and acid-base status.
Responses in resting muscle.
Results from ACh-infusion experiments in resting muscles are shown in
Fig. 1.
Rv displayed a dose-dependent
reduction with increasing ACh levels, demonstrating a significant
endothelium-dependent response (18) under these conditions. SNP
(0.2-1.0 µg/ml) produced similar results, with decrements
ranging from
200 to
500 PRU. These experiments indicated
that an endothelium-independent response (18) could also be elicited
within this preparation at rest.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
ACh dose-response relationship (means ± SE) of resting
gastrocnemius-plantaris (GP) muscle vasculature
(n = 3 muscles). Resistance decreased
as a function of increasing ACh dose, when muscle blood flow
( ) was maintained at resting levels. Decreases in
resistance with highest ACh dose at rest were similar in magnitude to
those during contractions with no ACh. PRU, peripheral resistance
units. * P < 0.05 compared
with 10 mM ACh;
v P < 0.05 compared with dose = 0.
|
|
Table 1 shows the magnitude of
Rv changes with increasing doses
of NO antagonists tested sequentially in muscles at rest. L-ArgSA reproducibly increased
Rv significantly in muscles at rest at isosmotic dosages (
1.0 mM). A 10-fold greater dose of L-NAME was required to elicit a
significant increase in Rv in muscles at rest in these experiments. Isotonic saline alone was found
to produce no measurable changes in
Rv under these conditions.
Responses in contracting muscle.
In the ten experiments in which
O2 was evaluated,
averaged 0.29-0.40 and 1.34-1.46
ml · min
1 · g
1
with the muscle at rest and contracting, respectively (Table 2). The similarity of within-group values
during contractions, compared between spontaneous and pump-controlled
conditions with no blockers, indicates that the
initial
target was achieved by using the perfusion
pump.
O2 averaged 21-27
µl · min
1 · g
1
with the muscle at rest and was similar between spontaneous and pump-controlled
conditions (Table 2).
O2 averaged 200-228 µl · min
1 · g
1
during repetitive tetanic contractions and was also similar between
conditions. Infusion of blockers
L-ArgSA and
L-NAME (1.0 mM) produced no
significant drops in
O2
within the brief (3-min) time window of drug infusion evaluated in
these experiments. These values reflect a 10-fold increase in
O2 from rest, indicating achievement of a high metabolic rate in conjunction with the active hyperemic response resultant of the tetanic contraction regime.
for all other experiments described below averaged
1.2-1.5 ml · min
1 · g
1
during contractions.
A dose-response relationship showing changes in
Rv with sequential
L-ArgSA dosages during
contractions (n = 4 muscles) is shown
in Fig. 2. As in the muscles at rest, 1.0 mM was most effective, although significant increases were produced at
lesser dosages. Both in the studies shown here and in pilot
experiments, 1.0 mM L-ArgSA was
tested in a total of 24 muscles, reliably resulting in
Rv values that were two to four
times greater than those during contractions with no drug. Also shown
is the dose-response relationship obtained with
L-NAME infusion during
contractions. L-NAME at
0.5-1.0 mM resulted in a small but statistically significant
increase in Rv, which was elevated
further with 2.0 mM L-NAME (+58
PRU, P < 0.05 compared with initial
Rv with no drug). With continued 2.0 mM L-NAME
(n = 4, not shown), subsequent
simultaneous 0.5 mM
L-arginine decreased
Rv slightly (
19 PRU), but
it remained significantly elevated compared with contractions with no
drug (P < 0.05). Further
administration of 1.0 mM
L-arginine reduced Rv by 23 PRU to a level not
statistically different from the initial contraction-induced
Rv. We considered this result to
infer that this dose of
L-arginine was effective in
reversing the effects of 2.0 mM
L-NAME. Infusion of the highest
dose of L-NAME (10 mM) was not
attempted in these experiments, because it represented delivery of a
hyperosmotic solution (>310 mosM), which might have opposing
vasodilatory effects (32) complicating interpretation of the results.
This hyperosmotic vasodilatory mechanism was found to be inducible when
120 mM L-arginine,
D-arginine,
L-lysine, and sucrose solutions
(1,000-1,500 mosM/kg) were administered sequentially during
continuous L-ArgSA infusion
(Fig. 3) and, therefore, was avoided except
in the L-ArgSA vs. L-arginine competitive experiments, as described below.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Dose-response relationship (means ± SE) obtained in contracting
muscles for nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitors
L-argininosuccinic acid
(L-ArgSA; solid bars,
n = 4 muscles) and
NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester
(L-NAME; open bars,
n = 8 muscles).
P < 0.05, L-NAME compared with
respective initial value with no drug;
< 0.05, L-ArgSA compared with
respective initial value with no drug.
|
|

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Muscle vascular resistance (Rv)
changes due to hyperosmotic solution administration (120 mM) during
contractions with simultaneous
L-ArgSA infusion in 1 muscle.
, Rv at rest (1st symbol) and
with 3 min of contractions during spontaneous (2nd
symbol); , Rv values with
perfusion pump set up in place. A high resting
Rv was reestablished after 30-min
recovery period after contractions with spontaneous ,
and low Rv was reachieved with 3 min of contractions during pump control of set at
the spontaneous hyperemic level. Contractions alone, no drug infusion;
L-Arg,
L-arginine (1,270 mosM/kg);
D-Arg,
D-arginine (1,270 mosM/kg).
L-Lysine solution was 1,432 mosM/kg; sucrose solution was 1,082 mosM/kg. Lowermost , achievement
of low Rv due to hyperosmotic
vasodilatory effects; uppermost , initial achievement followed by
reestablishment of high Rv with
continued L-ArgSA infusion and
subsequent discontinuation of each hyperosmotic compound (each infused
for 3-5 min).
|
|
As shown in Fig. 4, 1.0 mM
L-ArgSA during contractions
(second bar set) produced a significant increase of
Rv by two to four times over its
initial low value with no drug (first bar set) in all trials. The time
control trial (open bars) indicated the continuous increase in
Rv with continued infusion of
L-ArgSA over time. The
noncompetitive irreversibility of NO synthesis blockade by
L-ArgSA was indicated by this
same behavior during simultaneous L-arginine infusions (hatched
bars), with significant reduction only with 120 mM
L-arginine. This same pattern of
Rv increase was seen during the
initial portion of the SNP infusion trial (solid bars) but was
subsequently reduced in a stepwise fashion with increasing doses of
SNP. Rv with 1.0 µg/ml SNP was
also significantly lower than the matched time control with
L-ArgSA alone. With continued infusion of L-ArgSA during this
trial, 3.0 µg/ml SNP reduced Rv to a level that was not statistically different from that with contractions alone.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Changes in Rv during contraction
trials with L-ArgSA (means ± SE). First set of bars on left,
average Rv measured in each trial
during contractions with no drugs infused; other bar
sets, results with constant 1.0 mM
L-ArgSA infusion. Time-control
trials (open bars, n = 4 muscles) show
increasing Rv with no opposing
nitric oxide agonist. Stepwise increments in simultaneously delivered
nitric oxide precursor
L-arginine (0.5, 1.0, 10 mM) did
not reverse Rv increase produced
with L-ArgSA (hatched bars,
n = 4 muscles), with exception of 120 mM.
v P < 0.05, 120 mM L-arginine
compared with all prior Rv values
in this trial. Stepwise increments in simultaneously delivered sodium
nitroprusside (SNP) reversed
L-ArgSA-mediated
Rv increase (solid bars,
n = 6 muscles; except for 2.0 and 3.0 µg/ml, n = 4 muscles).
* P < 0.05, 1.0 µg/ml SNP
vs. matching time-control value;
P < 0.05 compared with respective
Rv value with contractions alone
(i.e., no drug). Timing and perfusion protocol are identical for each
trial, as described in text.
|
|
Alterations in muscle mechanics were observed with
L-ArgSA administration, such
that both Tact and
PIM loss was exacerbated during
infusion and was not reversed with simultaneous
L-arginine administration (Fig.
5). With
L-ArgSA infusion beginning at
minute 3, both
Tact and peak
PIM were observed to decline at a
greater rate during minutes 4-12
than during the initial 4 min, and than that of control muscles over
the same time period. Tpass and
passive PIM in these same muscles
(Fig. 6) increased significantly during L-ArgSA infusion, possibly
through production of incomplete relaxation between activations. No
effects on Tact,
Tpass, or
PIM were observed with
1.0-2.0 mM L-NAME.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Top: decrements (means ± SE) in
active tension (Tactive) with
administration of 1.0 mM L-ArgSA
beginning at 3 min of repetitive contractions ( ,
n = 7 muscles). ,
Tactive in control experiments
with no antagonist (n = 3 muscles).
Bottom: simultaneous change in active
peak intramuscular pressure
(PIM) during contractions in
same L-ArgSA experiments as
measured within zone II, i.e., in muscle "belly" or central
region of medial head of GP muscle.
* P < 0.05 compared with value
at time = 0 min.
|
|

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Top: increments (means ± SE) in
passive tension (Tpass) with
administration of 1.0 mM L-ArgSA
during contractions ( , n = 7 muscles). , Baseline Tpass in
control experiments with no antagonist
(n = 3 muscles).
Bottom: simultaneous change in passive
PIM during contractions in same
L-ArgSA experiments, shown as
increase from PIM baseline. Zones
I, II, and III are popliteal origin, muscle belly, and insertion region
near calcaneus tendon of medial head of GP muscle, respectively.
* P < 0.05 compared with value
at time = 0 min.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The main finding of this study was that NO appears to play a role in
control of Rv at rest and during
repetitive tetanic contractions within the canine GP muscle in situ. NO
synthesis inhibitors, delivered directly into the muscle vasculature,
resulted in a significant increase in
Rv during electrically stimulated
contractions of high force and metabolic rates. The competitive,
reversible NO inhibitor L-NAME
produced statistically significant increments of
Rv during contractions that were
reversible with L-arginine. The
noncompetitive, irreversible NO inhibitor
L-ArgSA produced large
increments in Rv that were not
reversible with L-arginine. This
increase in Rv with
L-ArgSA was reversed by
administration of SNP, presumably through direct donation of NO to
vascular smooth muscle, thus bypassing the endothelial NO blockade.
During the administration of
L-ArgSA, muscle performance was
measurably affected, demonstrating a significant decline in
Tact and
PIM production and a significant
increase in Tpass and baseline
PIM that was not reversible with
L-arginine.
Comparisons with other studies of hyperemia.
The results of this study agree with those of Hussain et al. (18), in
which L-ArgSA was used as a NO
synthesis blocker, and NO was reported to play a significant role
(22-41%) in the alteration of
Rv in the canine diaphragm in situ
during twitch contractions (2/s). Our results are also consistent with
those of Sagach et al. (27), in which loss of the "functional"
hyperemic response was observed with endothelial blockade in the
contracting canine GP muscle in situ. Finally, our data are
consistent with studies in which
L-NAME decreased the diameter of
arterioles mainly in contracting, as opposed to resting, hamster
cremaster muscles (16).
However, our results appear to be inconsistent with two other studies
that used the canine GP muscle, both of which utilized repetitive
isometric twitch contractions (8, 19). One study reported no effect of
NO on functional hyperemia (8) with
NG-monomethyl-L-arginine
(L-NMMA, another competitive
reversible inhibitor of NOS) infusion during twitch contractions of
4/s. Another study (19) utilized twitch rates of 1, 2, 4, and
6/s, with blockade produced by iv bolus pretreatment with
L-NAME (20 mg/kg). Assuming a
normal canine systemic blood volume and uniform distribution, that
systemic L-NAME load would peak
at 0.99 mM, similar to the dose directly delivered to the muscles in
the present study. However, no significant alteration of
Rv was observed in any but one
case (19). In both studies (8, 19), developed forces (50-150 g/g)
and
(0.25-0.85
ml · min
1 · g
1)
were lower than values achieved in the present study, suggesting a
lesser mechanical effect (4) and metabolic response (3).
Thus one possible explanation for this seeming inconsistency may be the
significantly greater muscle mechanical performance and metabolic rates
produced with rhythmic tetanic contractions in the present study. The
twitch forces measured in the present study (102 g/g) are indicative of
the difference between twitch and tetanic contractions, being only
~19% of that developed by tetanic contractions (540 g/g). This would
theoretically result in much less contraction-induced vascular
deformation with twitch contractions (21), in lower extravascular
forces produced (4), and, therefore, in much less potentiation of NO
production by this mechanism. Perhaps most importantly, twitch rates
above 2/s do not allow for full relaxation between contractions, thus
producing an elevation in Tpass
and an impediment of the
which normally occur during
the relaxation phase (2), possibly limiting the large hyperemic
response that is characteristic of rhythmic high-intensity muscle
contractions. Support for these possibilities has been suggested
previously by Gilligan et al. (14), who stated that greater effects of
NO might be seen with intense rhythmic exercise, thus producing high
blood flows. However, it may be possible that NOS inhibition is
compensated by other vasodilatory mechanisms during relatively
low-demand contractions like twitches, such that NO blockade results in
little measurable effect under those conditions (19). Subsequently,
those alternative mechanisms may be unable to compensate for inhibition
of NOS under high-demand situations, such as tetanic contractions
investigated in the present study.
Interpretation of Rv at rest.
The resting muscle experiments indicate that NO production is
significant even when no contractions are occurring. Furthermore, the
results indicate that the competitive, reversible inhibitor L-NAME was less effective than
the noncompetitive, irreversible blocker
L-ArgSA in blocking this
production (Table 1). One possible explanation for this difference is
that the concentration gradient for
L-arginine favors release from
skeletal muscle into the circulation by a factor of 6.5-fold (9), thus
presenting a competitive outward flux that would have to be overcome by
L-NAME for it to be most
effective. However, it should be noted that, although the magnitude of
increment of Rv in resting muscle
with 1 mM L-ArgSA was
significant and eventually similar to that observed with contractions, it occurred over an extended time range (10-20 vs. 3 min). Figure 7 graphically shows the difference in the
evolution of the Rv response with
L-ArgSA-induced NO blockade
during the critical timing window of initial
L-ArgSA administration. Taken
together, the above data suggest that the rate of NO production was
slower in resting muscle compared with contracting muscle. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that these differences might be due to
the fact that more L-ArgSA was
delivered to more vascular beds within the contracting muscle.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Rv changes (means ± SE) as a
function of time in resting ( ) and contracting ( ) muscles infused
with 1 mM L-ArgSA during
constant pump perfusion are shown for initial 3-min drug infusion
window. Total Rv change due to
L-ArgSA for resting and
contracting muscles was 104 and 165 PRU, respectively, over 3 min.
Initial drop of Rv in contracting
muscles was 350 PRU because of vasodilation under pump-perfusion
control.
|
|
Interpretation of Rv during contractions.
The results of the present study suggest several possible
interpretations with respect to the influence of NO on
Rv. One interpretation is that the
rate of NO production by the endothelium within this muscle group
during rhythmic high-force contractions is so great that an
irreversible blocker of NO production
(L-ArgSA) given directly over
time is necessary to counter these effects. This interpretation is
suggested by Figs. 3 and 4.
L-Arginine, given in low,
matching, and higher doses, did not reverse this effect; its reversal
required direct donation of NO to the smooth muscle or induction of a
hyperosmotic vasodilatory effect through a separate pathway. The data
of Hirai et al. (17), which show a significant role of the NO pathway
in determination of
in exercising muscles with
high-oxidative fiber type composition, support this interpretation. Also, similar to the present study, a two- to threefold difference in
magnitude of effect between locally administered
L-ArgSA and the competitive
inhibitor L-NAME has been
reported previously for the perfused, repetitively contracting
diaphragm muscle (18). By the above interpretation, the significant but
less robust results with L-NAME
might be expected, because higher doses of a competitive inhibitor
would be required to dampen a strongly potentiated NO signal resulting
from intense muscular contractions (16). Therefore, there are
precedents, to which we are presently inclined, for the above
interpretation of the present data.
However, another interpretation of these data is that the significant
effects of the blockers are not necessarily due to NOS blockade
qualities but may be due to other NO-independent endothelial effects on
vascular reactivity. Within this scheme, the
L-ArgSA and
L-NAME experiments suggest that
NO has little, if any, role in the resistance response during
contractions. This interpretation also has precedent but only from
experiments in which 1) the tension (from twitch contractions) was low and only competitive, reversible blockers were administered (8, 19), or
2)
L-NMMA was administered at
resting dosages in exercising human forearms, with no increase in drug
delivery to account for the dilution that occurs with active hyperemia
(12, 34). Thus absent other definitive data on rhythmic tetanic
contractions in this preparation, we do not favor this interpretation
at present.
A third interpretation is that
L-ArgSA produced increases in
Rv indirectly, through effects
within the contracting muscle fibers, as opposed to a direct effect on
the vascular endothelium. For instance, some cross bridges might have
persisted after activation, thus prolonging tension during relaxation,
elevating baseline PIM between
activations, and increasing Rv
because of a mechanical restriction or occlusion of the muscle
vasculature (4). This interpretation is supported by
1) the fact that
was decreased significantly despite pump control of perfusion during
infusion of L-ArgSA (Table 2),
2) the development of significant
Tpass and the
PIM baseline elevation during
infusion of L-ArgSA (Fig. 6),
and 3) previous studies showing the
-limiting and fatigue-enhancing effect of elevated
preload (2), possibly resulting in the accentuated decline of
Tact and peak
PIM during
L-ArgSA infusion (Fig. 5). Therefore, this indirect mechanism of alteration of
Rv by
L-ArgSA would be due to a
mechanical effect, produced by alterations in muscle-fiber contractile
activity and its effect on vessel occlusion during contractions (3, 4).
Finally, it is also possible that large amounts of NO are produced by
the myofibers themselves during high-intensity contractions (5), which
may augment the shear-induced NO production by the endothelium. Within
this interpretation, the Rv
effects of both L-ArgSA and
L-NAME are again encompassed.
The fact that NOS has been reported to exist in skeletal muscle fibers
(20) is further consistent with this possibility. If NO production by
contracting muscle fibers in situ is significant, it stands to reason
that either a noncompetitive, irreversible NOS inhibitor or elevated doses of a competitive, reversible NOS inhibitor would be necessary to
counter this NO "load." Furthermore, based on the fact that increased NO production from contracting muscle has been reported to
occur (5), it is possible that the concentration gradient for
L-arginine release from skeletal
muscle into the circulation may become >6.5-fold (9). This would
present an additional competitive flux that would have to be overcome
by higher dosing during contractions for
L-NAME to be most effective.
Although presently speculative, this interpretation offers an
interesting possibility of additional sources of vasoregulatory signals
that may be induced with high-intensity muscular activity.
Comparisons with other studies of muscle performance.
Prior studies of effects of NO on in situ muscle performance have
documented a variety of results. One study of the GP muscle showed that
L-NAME increased force
development of twitches at 1 and 2 twitches/s, but not at 4 or 6 twitches/s (19), whereas another found no effects of
L-NMMA on force development of
twitches at 4 twitches/s (8), suggesting some consistency of effects as
a function of stimulation frequency. The addition of NO, through administration of
S-nitroso-N-acetyl-penicillamine,
produced, on average, 3-6% greater fatigue in force than did
N-acetyl-penicillamine alone during
repetitive twitches of 1.5 and 4/s and tetanic contractions of 40/min,
but no effects with 0.5 twitch/s and 12/min tetanic contractions (25). Again, this heterogeneity of response was attributed to stimulation frequency differences but is difficult to
compare with the present results because we utilized 60/min tetanic
contractions and did not add SNP alone. The absence of these
alterations in muscular performance with
L-NAME in the present study may
have been due to either dosing insufficient to overcome gradients for
entry into the skeletal muscle fibers (9) or to intracellular
quantities insufficient to compete with native L-arginine (9, 26). Studies have
shown that a plasma concentration of 3.0 mM is necessary to saturate
the entry mechanism for
L-arginine into skeletal
muscle (6). Assuming that L-NAME
follows this pathway and must compete with intracellular
L-arginine for NOS, a reduced or
absent response with 1.0 mM
L-NAME might be expected in
muscle in situ.
The present study has indicated a significant effect of the
noncompetitive, irreversible NO blocker
L-ArgSA on
Tact,
Tpass, and
PIM produced within the GP muscle
in situ. This suggests some role for NO in the contraction process.
Balon and Nadler (5) have shown significant NO production by
contracting skeletal muscles subsequently incubated in vitro, thus
suggesting that some mechanism might be present for its use within the
myocytes, perhaps in the excitation-contraction coupling process (20).
For example, if L-ArgSA blocked
NO production and altered reuptake of calcium into the sarcoplasmic
reticulum, it may be that incomplete relaxation occurred (evident as
elevated Tpass in Fig. 6) with
persistence of calcium in the sarcoplasm. A possible lack of
resequestration of this calcium might also lead to a decrement in its
release with subsequent activations (1), leading to the significant decrement of Tact observed in Fig.
5.
However, similar to the varied results reported in muscle in situ,
studies of muscles in vitro have displayed a heterogeneity of results,
which may be dependent on species, fiber type distribution, and NOS
enzyme activity (20). For instance, in the rat diaphragm, nitro-L-arginine (a blocker of
NO synthesis) produced an ~7% increase in tetanic force, whereas SNP
produced 3-7% reductions in tetanic force (20). In contrast,
S-nitroso-N-acetyl-penicillamine
produced 4-6% increments in tetanic force in both mouse soleus
and extensor digitorum longus muscles in vitro (24). Overall, the above
results are difficult to compare with those of the present study, but all suggest that NO has some role in the muscle contraction process.
Critique of methods.
The design of the experiments in the present study included local
administration of NO antagonists and agonists directly into the GP
muscle vasculature during contractions with controlled
. Under these conditions, the time response of the
increase in Rv to
L-ArgSA was rapid (
3 min) and
ever increasing with continued administration (Fig. 4). This rapid and
sensitive behavior of the vasculature necessitated the use of brief
timing windows (3-5 min) during drug administration. However, we
found that strict regulation of muscle arterial
was
not simple to achieve under these conditions of manual pump control
because of the capacity of the muscle vasculature to autoregulate under
changing conditions of pressure and metabolic demand (31). For
instance, when the arterial supply pump was set to maintain
and allow arterial pressure to fluctuate
as a function of Rv, we observed
that the response with L-ArgSA
was strong enough to cause a small but significant drop in
, even though the roller pump speed setting was
unchanged (Table 2). Figure 8 shows this
effect, which was not significant for the case of
L-NAME. The drop in
probably was the result of the intense
vasoconstriction produced by
L-ArgSA, also evidenced as the
significant increase of MAP shown in Table 2. Attempts to rectify this
drop in
through minor manual adjustments of the pump
speed control were abandoned because of the delay between the
adjustment and response, typically resulting in repeated overshoot of
the target
and a miss of the timing
window. Thus the approach we employed likely resulted in smaller
Rv changes than might have otherwise been observed, because more strict rectifications and maintenance of
would have produced even greater MAP
elevations and subsequently greater increases of
Rv during NO blockade. Although these results show a significant role for NO in the control of Rv during tetanic contractions of
the GP muscle group, they likely underestimate this response because of
the limitations of our experimental technique.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
changes in individual muscles with 1 mM NOS blocker
infusion during contractions under pump-perfusion control show
significant decrease in flow in all muscles with
L-ArgSA administration. For each
muscle, time period between each datum with no drug (contractions) and
datum with blocker is 3 min. n = 5 Muscles per blocker; n.s., not significantly different. Mean blood flow
values for each case are as shown in Table 2.
|
|
Although not the only NO synthesis inhibitor available,
L-ArgSA was utilized as a
blocker of endothelial NO synthesis in these studies for several
reasons. First, it had a rapid onset of action, as evidenced by the
increase of Rv during contractions
within 3 min. This property was considered essential to the study of the role of NO by blockade during a time period in which the
and
O2
response are typically maximal in this preparation (3, 4, 10). Second,
L-ArgSA has been shown to be a
noncompetitive, irreversible inhibitor of NO synthesis (15, 18), which
we have verified functionally in this muscle preparation (Fig. 4). Because we hypothesized originally that NO production was a function of
contraction-induced shear forces acting on the endothelium, this
blocker was considered ideal for these experiments because it ensured
cancellation of endothelial NO effects on regulation of
Rv. Third, the use of
L-ArgSA provided the possibility
of a NO synthesis blockade within the vascular endothelium that could be bypassed by direct donation of NO to the smooth muscle, thereby allowing the observation of a direct NO-dependent alteration of smooth
muscle activity on Rv during
contractions (Fig. 4). The results suggest that
1) the endothelium plays a
significant role in the determination of the resistance response during
repetitive contractions of this muscle group, as evidenced by the rise
in Rv with its blockade, and
2) the source of this response may
be extravascular shear forces on the endothelium during intense
contractions. This was concluded because direct supply of NO to the
smooth muscle decreased Rv during
a simultaneous, irreversible blockade that removed the endothelial
response while the shear stimulus of the contractions was still
present. The results are suggestive of a mechanism of NO-mediated
relaxation of the vascular smooth muscle that lowers
Rv and enables the achievement of
high flow rates during intense muscular activity.
In summary, given the differences in muscle mechanics and experimental
preparations, it is possible that many of the NO/hyperemia studies
represent points on a continuum of NO effects on the vascular activity
within skeletal muscle. For instance, other metabolic and
non-shear-related mechanisms may predominate in the control of vascular
activity at rest and low intensities of contractile activity (19), with
progressive contribution from the extravascular shear-related
mechanisms as the contraction intensity approaches maximum. Also, the
differences across studies may be related to differing mechanisms of
action between the NO synthesis blockers utilized in each study and the
blockade treatment paradigm used, such as systemic bolus pretreatment
vs. direct administration during contractions. These possibilities
suggest that the present understanding of these differences and
mechanisms is incomplete and requires further study.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
The authors thank Frank Phelps and Mark Barsic for technical
assistance with these studies.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
This study was supported by American Heart Association, Western
Pennsylvania Affiliate, Grant-in-Aid BTA52 and the Love Pulmonary Foundation of Pittsburgh.
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement"
in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: B. T. Ameredes,
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Univ. of
Pittsburgh, 440 Scaife Hall, 3550 Terrace St., Pittsburgh, PA 15261 (E-mail: ameredes{at}pop.pitt.edu).
Received 6 April 1998; accepted in final form 19 February 1999.
 |
REFERENCES |
1.
Allen, D. G.,
J. A. Lee,
and
H. Westerblad.
Intracellular calcium and tension during fatigue in isolated single muscle fibers from Xenopus leavis.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
415:
433-458,
1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2.
Ameredes, B. T.,
W. F. Brechue,
and
W. N. Stainsby.
Preload release increases muscle blood flow and decreases fatigue during repetitive isotonic muscle contractions.
J. Appl. Physiol.
77:
2641-2647,
1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3.
Ameredes, B. T.,
W. F. Brechue,
and
W. N. Stainsby.
Mechanical and metabolic determination of fatigue during repetitive isometric muscle contractions in situ.
J. Appl. Physiol.
84:
1909-1916,
1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4.
Ameredes, B. T.,
and
M. A. Provenzano.
Regional intramuscular pressure development and fatigue in the canine gastrocnemius muscle in situ.
J. Appl. Physiol.
83:
1867-1876,
1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5.
Balon, T. W.,
and
J. L. Nadler.
Nitric oxide release is present from incubated skeletal muscle preparations.
J. Appl. Physiol.
77:
2519-2521,
1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].
6.
Baños, G.,
P. M. Daniel,
S. R. Moorhouse,
and
O. E. Pratt.
The movement of amino acids between blood and skeletal muscle in the rat.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
235:
459-475,
1973[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7.
Barclay, J.
A delivery-independent blood flow effect on skeletal muscle fatigue.
J. Appl. Physiol.
61:
1084-1089,
1986[Abstract/Free Full Text].
8.
Barclay, J. K.,
and
N. E. Woodley.
Nitric oxide synthase inhibitors do not alter functional hyperemia in canine skeletal muscle.
Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol.
72:
1035-1041,
1994[Medline].
9.
Bergström, J.,
P. Fürst,
L.-O. Norée,
and
E. Vinnars.
Intracellular free amino acid concentration in human muscle tissue.
J. Appl. Physiol.
36:
693-697,
1974[Free Full Text].
10.
Brechue, W. F.,
J. K. Barclay,
D. M. O'Drobinak,
and
W. N. Stainsby.
Differences between
O2 maxima of twitch and tetanic contractions are related to blood flow.
J. Appl. Physiol.
71:
131-135,
1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11.
Dyke, C. K.,
D. N. Proctor,
N. M. Dietz,
and
M. J. Joyner.
Role of nitric oxide in exercise hyperaemia during prolonged rhythmic handgripping in humans.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
488:
258-265,
1995.
12.
Endo, T.,
T. Imaizumi,
T. Tagawa,
M. Shiramoto,
S. Ando,
and
A. Takeshita.
Role of nitric oxide in exercise-induced vasodilation of the forearm.
Circulation
90:
2886-2890,
1994[Medline].
13.
Fales, J. T.,
S. A. Lillienthal,
S. A. Talbot,
and
K. L. Zierler.
A pneumatic isotonic lever system for dog skeletal muscle.
J. Appl. Physiol.
13:
307-308,
1958[Free Full Text].
14.
Gilligan, D. M.,
J. A. Panza,
C. M. Kilcoyne,
M. A. Waclawiw,
P. R. Casino,
and
A. A. Quyyumi.
Contribution of endothelium-derived nitric oxide to exercise-induced vasodilation.
Circulation
90:
2853-2858,
1994[Medline].
15.
Gold, M. E.,
K. S. Wood,
G. M. Buga,
R. E. Byrns,
and
L. J. Ignarro.
L-Arginine causes whereas L-argininosuccinic acid inhibits endothelium-dependent vascular smooth muscle relaxation.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
161:
536-543,
1989[Medline].
16.
Hester, R. L.,
A. Eraslan,
and
Y. Saito.
Differences in EDNO contribution to arteriolar diameters at rest and during functional dilation in striated muscle.
Am. J. Physiol.
265 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 34):
H146-H151,
1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].
17.
Hirai, T.,
M. D. Visneski,
K. J. Kearns,
R. Zelis,
and
T. I. Musch.
Effects of NO synthase inhibition on the muscular blood flow response to treadmill exercise in rats.
J. Appl. Physiol.
77:
1288-1293,
1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18.
Hussain, S. N. A.,
D. J. Stewart,
J. P. Ludemann,
and
S. Magder.
Role of endothelium-derived relaxing factor in active hyperemia of the canine diaphragm.
J. Appl. Physiol.
72:
2393-2401,
1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].
19.
King-VanVlack, C. E.,
S. E. Curtis,
J. D. Mewburn,
S. M. Cain,
and
C. K. Chapler.
Role of endothelial factors in active hyperemic responses in contracting canine muscle.
J. Appl. Physiol.
79:
107-112,
1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].
20.
Kobzik, L.,
M. B. Reid,
D. S. Bredt,
and
J. S. Stamler.
Nitric oxide in skeletal muscle.
Nature
372:
546-548,
1994[Medline].
21.
Lamontagne, D.,
U. Pohl,
and
R. Busse.
Mechanical deformation of vessel wall and shear stress determine the basal release of endothelium-derived relaxing factor in the intact rabbit coronary vascular bed.
Circ. Res.
70:
123-130,
1992[Abstract].
22.
Maxwell, L. C.,
J. K. Barclay,
D. E. Mohrman,
and
J. A. Faulkner.
Physiological characteristics of skeletal muscle of dogs and cats.
Am. J. Physiol.
233 (Cell Physiol. 2):
C14-C18,
1977[Abstract/Free Full Text].
23.
Messina, E. J.,
R. Weiner,
and
G. Kaley.
Arteriolar reactive hyperemia: modification by inhibitors of prostaglandin synthesis.
Am. J. Physiol.
232 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 1):
H571-H575,
1977.
24.
Murrant, C. L.,
and
J. K. Barclay.
Endothelial cell products alter mammalian skeletal muscle function in vitro.
Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol.
73:
736-741,
1995[Medline].
25.
Murrant, C. L.,
J. C. Frisbee,
and
J. K. Barclay.
The effect of nitric oxide and endothelin on skeletal muscle contractility changes when stimulation is altered.
Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol.
75:
414-422,
1997[Medline].
26.
Nakamura, T.,
and
R. L. Prewitt.
Effects of NG-monomethyl-L-arginine on endothelium-dependent relaxation in arterioles of one-kidney, one clip hypertensive rats.
Hypertension
17:
875-880,
1991[Abstract].
27.
Sagach, V. F.,
A. M. Kindybalyuk,
and
T. N. Kovalenko.
Functional hyperemia of skeletal muscle: role of endothelium.
J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol.
20, Suppl. 12:
S170-S175,
1992.
28.
Sakuma, I.,
D. J. Stuehr,
S. S. Gross,
C. Nathan,
and
R. Levi.
Identification of arginine as a precursor of endothelium-derived relaxing factor.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
85:
8664-8667,
1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].
29.
Seccombe, J. F.
Endothelium-derived relaxing factor.
In: Vasoactive Factors Produced by the Endothelium: Physiology and Surgical Implications, edited by J. F. Seccombe,
and H. V. Schaff. Austin, TX: R. G. Landes, 1994, chapt. 2, p. 5-26.
30.
Shen, W.,
M. Lundborg,
J. Wang,
J. M. Stewart,
X. Xu,
M. Ocha,
and
T. H. Hintze.
Role of EDRF in the regulation of regional blood flow and vascular resistance at rest and during exercise in conscious dogs.
J. Appl. Physiol.
77:
165-172,
1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].
31.
Stainsby, W. N.
Autoregulation of blood flow in skeletal muscle during increased metabolic activity.
Am. J. Physiol.
202:
273-276,
1962.
32.
Stainsby, W. N.,
and
M. J. Fregly.
Effect of plasma osmolality on resistance to blood flow through skeletal muscle.
Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.
128:
284-287,
1968[Medline].
33.
Van Slyke, D. D.,
and
J. M. Neill.
The determination of gasses in blood and other solutions by vacuum extraction and manometric measurement.
Int. J. Biochem.
61:
523-573,
1924.
34.
Wilson, J. R.,
and
S. Kapoor.
Contribution of endothelium-derived relaxing factor to exercise-induced vasodilation in humans.
J. Appl. Physiol.
75:
2740-2744,
1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].
J APPL PHYSIOL 87(1):142-151
8570-7587/99 $5.00
Copyright © 1999 the American Physiological Society