Journal of Applied Physiology Add DOIs to your references at manuscript stage!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 86: 1897-1904, 1999;
8750-7587/99 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clar, C.
Right arrow Articles by Robbins, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clar, C.
Right arrow Articles by Robbins, P. A.
Vol. 86, Issue 6, 1897-1904, June 1999

Ventilatory effects of 8 h of isocapnic hypoxia with and without beta -blockade in humans

Christine Clar, Keith L. Dorrington, and Peter A. Robbins

University Laboratory of Physiology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PT, United Kingdom


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

This study investigated whether changing sympathetic activity, acting via beta -receptors, might induce the progressive ventilatory changes observed in response to prolonged hypoxia. The responses of 10 human subjects to four 8-h protocols were compared: 1) isocapnic hypoxia (end-tidal PO2 = 50 Torr) plus 80-mg doses of oral propranolol; 2) isocapnic hypoxia, as in protocol 1, with oral placebo; 3) air breathing with propranolol; and 4) air breathing with placebo. Exposures were conducted in a chamber designed to maintain end-tidal gases constant by computer control. Ventilation (VE) was measured at regular intervals throughout. Additionally, the subjects' ventilatory hypoxic sensitivity and their residual VE during hyperoxia (5 min) were assessed at 0, 4, and 8 h by using a dynamic end-tidal forcing technique. beta -Blockade did not significantly alter either the rise in VE seen during 8 h of isocapnic hypoxia or the changes observed in the acute hypoxic ventilatory response and residual VE in hyperoxia over that period. The results do not provide evidence that changes in sympathetic activity acting via beta -receptors play a role in the mediation of ventilatory changes observed during 8 h of isocapnic hypoxia.

ventilation; hypoxic sensitivity; high-altitude acclimatization


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

VENTILATORY ACCLIMATIZATION to hypoxia involves a slow and progressive rise in ventilation (VE), which in turn produces a slow increase in end-tidal PO2 (PETO2), a slow decrease in end-tidal PCO2 (PETCO2), and a progressive respiratory alkalosis. These changes start within the first few hours of the acclimatization process, and during this time the rise in VE is accompanied by an increase in the peripheral chemoreflex sensitivity to acute hypoxia [acute hypoxic ventilatory response (AHVR)]. At the cessation of the hypoxic exposure, and return to either euoxic or hyperoxic conditions, VE does not immediately revert to normal but remains somewhat elevated. The mechanisms that underlie these early stages of acclimatization are not fully understood, but it has been established that the main stimulus pathway does not involve the fall in PCO2 and rise in pH that normally accompany hypoxia. During isocapnic hypoxia, the progressive increase in VE is actually more pronounced than during poikilocapnic hypoxia (2, 19), presumably because of the absence of a hypocapnic braking effect. Both the increase in AHVR and the increase in VE under conditions of acute hyperoxia (compared with prehypoxic values) do not depend on whether the exposure was isocapnic and poikilocapnic (18, 36).

One possible mechanism is that changes in autonomic function underlie part of the slow respiratory adaptation to hypoxia. This notion is supported by the observation that circulating and urinary norepinephrine levels increase progressively in humans during exposure to high altitude (11, 25, 26), and this increase has been shown to correlate with an increase in VE (1). Although increases in circulating levels of norepinephrine can increase both VE and, more specifically, AHVR (10), there is also substantive evidence that carotid body function may be modulated directly by its own sympathetic supply. This evidence includes the observation that electrical stimulation of the sympathetic input to the carotid body (the preganglionic sympathetic trunk) in the anesthetized cat can increase chemosensory discharge (29). Both the human respiratory response to increases in circulating norepinephrine and the carotid body response to stimulation by norepinephrine in experimental animals may be blocked by beta -blockade (15, 16).

Given these observations, the hypothesis we wished to test in the present study was whether increases in beta -receptor-mediated sympathetic activity underlie the respiratory changes that occur early in the ventilatory acclimatization to hypoxia. We studied the response to hypoxia alone by maintainence of PETCO2 at the subject's normal air-breathing level. In particular, we studied three different aspects of the ventilatory response. First, we studied the effect of the drug on the progressive increase in VE seen during sustained hypoxia. Second, we investigated whether the elevation in VE that remains during brief periods of hyperoxia imposed within the overall hypoxic exposure could be altered by the drug. Third, we examined whether the increase in AHVR observed during prolonged hypoxia was affected by the drug.


    METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Subjects. We studied 10 subjects [6 men, 4 women; ages, 23.2 ± 3.3 (SD) yr; height, 181.3 ± 8.4 cm; weight, 72.1 ± 8.4 kg]. None of the subjects had a history of respiratory or cardiovascular disease. All subjects gave informed consent to the study. The study had been approved by the Central Oxford Research Ethics Committee.

Protocols. The protocols were designed to allow us to compare the effects of hypoxia with and without beta -blockade. Air-breathing protocols with and without the drug served as control exposures. Overall, the volunteers were subjected to four protocols on four different days (in varied order, with protocols separated by at least 1 wk). Female subjects were only studied during the first 2 wk of their menstrual cycles, unless they were taking a contraceptive pill, because levels of circulating progesterone are known to affect aspects of ventilation, such as CO2 sensitivity (12, 13).

The conditioning associated with each protocol lasted 8 h. The four protocols were as follows. 1) Isocapnic hypoxia, in which PETO2 was held at 50 Torr and PETCO2 was maintained at the subject's normal prehypoxic value. Four 80-mg doses of oral beta -blocker (propranolol) were given every 8 h, starting 16 h before the experiment began (protocol IH-P). 2) Isocapnic hypoxia, as in protocol IH-P, except that, in this protocol, placebo tablets were given in place of propranolol at the same times as in protocol IH-P (protocol IH-C). 3) Air-breathing control, in which propranolol was given as in protocol IH-P (protocol C-P). 4) Air-breathing control, in which placebo was given as in protocol IH-C (protocol C-C).

VE was measured during these protocols at intervals of 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 h after the start. At 0, 4, and 8 h, the subjects' AHVR and VE were determined under conditions of acute hyperoxia. The PETO2 profile used for these measurements is shown in Fig. 1. A 5-min lead-in period at a PETO2 of 100 Torr was followed by six square waves, with PETO2 alternating between 50 and 100 Torr and with each gas level being maintained for 1 min. After the last step, the PETO2 was increased to 300 Torr and was maintained at that level for 5 min. PETCO2 was kept at 1-2 Torr above the subject's normal air-breathing value for the duration of these measurements.


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Protocol used to measure hypoxic sensitivity and ventilation (VE) during hyperoxia: 5 min at end-tidal PO2 (PETO2) = 100 Torr, followed by six 1-min steps alternating between PETO2 = 50 and 100 Torr and 5 min at PETO2 = 300 Torr. End-tidal PCO2 (PETCO2) was held at 1-2 Torr above subject's normal air-breathing value for the whole protocol.

Experimental technique. For the main 8-h hypoxic and control exposures, individual subjects were seated inside a clear-sided experimental chamber, where they could pursue activities such as watching television or reading. Inside this chamber, the ambient PO2 and PCO2 could be altered. The subjects wore a nasal cannula, held in place with a nasal O2-therapy mask, and PETO2 and PETCO2 together with inspired PO2 and PCO2 were measured by using a mass spectrometer (Airspec QP9000, Biggin Hill, UK). Before the start of the exposures, each subject's normal PETCO2 value was determined during a 5-min period of air breathing. During the exposure, the subjects also wore a pulse oximeter (Ohmeda Biox 3740, Louisville, KY) that served as a safety device. At the start of the experiment, the desired end-tidal gas values were entered manually into a controlling computer that regulated the gas composition inside the chamber. Every 5 min, the computer compared the average end-tidal gas values of the previous 3 min with the desired values, and the chamber gas composition was adjusted, if necessary, to keep end-tidal values constant. The chamber and its control system have been described in more detail elsewhere (17).

Measurements of VE in the chamber were undertaken by using a respiratory inductance plethysmograph (Studley Data Systems, Oxford, UK). For each determination of VE, a 5-min measurement period was followed by a 5-min calibration period. During the measurement period, data were collected from the inductance plethysmograph with no disturbance of the subject. During the calibration period, subjects breathed via a mouthpiece and noseclip arrangement through a turbine volume-measurement device (SensorMedics VMM series, CardioKinetics, Salford, UK) while data continued to be collected by using inductance plethysmography. The signals obtained from inductance plethysmography in the second period of 5 min could thus be calibrated by using the simultaneous measurements of respiratory volumes, and the calibration coefficients so obtained were then used to calibrate the data obtained in the first 5 min without the use of the mouthpiece and noseclip.

The responses to square waves of hypoxia to assess AHVR and to short periods of hyperoxia were measured outside the chamber by using a mouthpiece and noseclip arrangement. Respiratory volumes were sensed with a turbine volume-measurement device. Respiratory flows and timing information were recorded with a Fleisch pneumotachograph. Gas was sampled continuously from a port close to the mouth, and inspired PO2 and PCO2 together with PETO2 and PETCO2 were measured by using a mass spectrometer (Airspec MGA3000). The subject was also connected to an electrocardiograph (Rigel cardiac monitor 302, Morden, UK) to monitor heart rate and wore a pulse-oximeter probe (Ohmeda Biox 3740) on one finger as a safety device to monitor saturation. A computer recorded the respiratory variables every 20 ms, logged the occurrence of each QRS complex from the electrocardiogram, and determined the values for PETO2 and PETCO2.

Gas control was achieved by using a computer-controlled fast gas-mixing system (20). The required inspiratory gas composition was derived from a combination of a prediction of values from a model of the cardiorespiratory system and a breath-by-breath correction of the deviation of the actual values from the measured values. This prediction-correction scheme has been described in more detail elsewhere (32).

Model fitting. Numerical values for AHVR were obtained by fitting a model of the ventilatory response to acute hypoxia to the data obtained during the square waves of hypoxia. The particular model employed was model 3 of Clement and Robbins (9). In this model, total VE has been represented as the sum of ventilation at 100% saturation (Vc), which has generally been ascribed to the central chemoreflex, and a ventilation which has been ascribed to the peripheral chemoreflex (Vp). In the present experiments, PETCO2 was maintained constant; therefore, Vc may be considered constant. Under conditions of both steady PETCO2 and steady PETO2, Vp would be equal to Gp (1 - S), where the gain term Gp is the hypoxic sensitivity at the fixed PETCO2, representing the slope of the increase in VE with a decrease in saturation (S). Therefore, under these conditions, VE= Vc + Gp (1 - S). However, under the conditions of dynamic hypoxic stimulation that we have been studying, it is also necessary to take into account the time constant (tau ) that represents the time VE takes to move toward a new steady-state value when the saturation is changed, and the time delay (td) that represents the time it takes blood with a given saturation in the lungs to reach the carotid bodies, where the stimulus acts to produce the ventilatory response. The differential equation for this model is
&tgr; <FR><NU>d<A><AC>V</AC><AC>˙</AC></A><SC>e</SC></NU><DE>d<IT>t</IT></DE></FR> + <A><AC>V</AC><AC>˙</AC></A><SC>e</SC> = <A><AC>V</AC><AC>˙</AC></A><SUB>c</SUB> + <IT>G</IT><SUB>p</SUB> [1 − <IT>S</IT>(<IT>t</IT> − <IT>t</IT><SUB>d</SUB>)]
By assuming that S (t - td) remains constant from the beginning to the end of individual breaths, the equation may be solved to yield VE for breath i, as a function of the input (S), the parameters of the model, and the value of VE for breath i - 1. 
(<A><AC>V</AC><AC>˙</AC></A><SC>e</SC>)<SUB><IT>i</IT></SUB> = {<A><AC>V</AC><AC>˙</AC></A><SUB>c</SUB> + <IT>G</IT><SUB>p</SUB> [1 − S(<IT>t</IT> − <IT>t</IT><SUB>d</SUB>)]}
 − {<A><AC>V</AC><AC>˙</AC></A><SUB>c</SUB> + <IT>G</IT><SUB>p</SUB> [1 − <IT>S</IT>(<IT>t</IT> − <IT>t</IT><SUB>d</SUB>)] − (<A><AC>V</AC><AC>˙</AC></A><SC>e</SC>)<SUB><IT>i</IT>−1</SUB>} ⋅ <IT>e</IT><SUP>−(<IT>t</IT><SUB>1</SUB>−<IT>t</IT><SUB>i−1</SUB>)/&tgr;</SUP>
The parameters of this model are Vc, Gp, tau , and td. These parameters were estimated by nonlinear regression by using the Numerical Algorithms Group (Oxford, UK) Fortran library routine E04FDF to minimize the sum of squares of the residuals. S was calculated from the measured PETO2 values by using the hemoglobin dissociation function as described by Severinghaus (35).

Statistical analysis. The main variables of interest were the values for VE in hypoxia or euoxia in the chamber (averages over the last 4 min of the 5-min measurement period were used), the values for VE in hyperoxia (averages over the last 3 min of the 5-min measurement period were used), and the values for Gp and Vc from the model fitting. ANOVA was used to test for significant differences between the responses to the four protocols. The particular factor of interest in the ANOVA was the interaction between drug, hypoxia, and time, because this addresses the question of whether the drug significantly altered, over time, the response of the respective variables to hypoxia.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

All 10 subjects completed the study successfully, although some suffered from headaches during the second half of the hypoxic exposures.

Effectiveness of beta -blockade. Table 1 shows the heart rate response at various time points for the four protocols. It can be seen that beta -blockade of the heart was effective, as heart rate was always substantially lower than in the placebo protocols (ANOVA, P < 0.001).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Heart rate measured in the chamber in each of the four protocols

End-tidal gas values before and during protocols. Values for air-breathing PETCO2 at the beginning of the experimental day were slightly but significantly (P < 0.05) lower in the presence of propranolol than when placebo had been taken (means ± SD of 5-min averages of breath-by-breath end-tidal values: propranolol protocols, 37.7 ± 4.5 Torr; placebo protocols, 39.1 ± 4.0 Torr). Figure 2, B and C, shows the gas control obtained in the chamber for the four protocols. Average values of PETO2 (excluding t = 0) were 52.5 ± 0.8 Torr in protocol IH-P, 52.3 ± 0.6 Torr in protocol IH-C, 108.7 ± 5.9 Torr in protocol C-P, and 109.1 ± 3.1 Torr in protocol C-C. Average values of PETCO2 were 37.5 ± 4.0 Torr (-0.2 ± 0.8 Torr difference from target value) in protocol IH-P, 38.9 ± 3.7 Torr (-0.2 ± 0.3 Torr difference from target value) in protocol IH-C, 37.8 ± 4.8 Torr in protocol C-P, and 38.8 ± 3.3 Torr in protocol C-C.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Ventilatory response (VE; A) measured in the chamber (respiratory inductance plethysmography) for the 4 protocols. , Isocapnic hypoxia + propranolol; open circle , isocapnic hypoxia + placebo; , air control plus propranolol; and , air control + placebo. Gas control for PETO2 (B) and PETCO2 (C) at the times when VE measurements were taken. Values are means ± SE.

VE during hypoxia. Figure 2A shows the ventilatory response to the four protocols, as measured by inductance plethysmography in the chamber. Interestingly, no initial effect of hypoxia on VE was apparent in these subjects, although this may simply be the result of rather high values for VE at t = 0 in the chamber (compare t = 0 values with the remainder for the euoxic protocols). Nevertheless, VE did increase with time during the hypoxic exposures (circles) but not during the air control experiments (squares). However, there was no significant difference between the response in the presence of propranolol (closed symbols) and in the presence of placebo (open symbols), during either the hypoxic exposure or the air control.

VE during acute hyperoxia. Table 2 shows the mean VE responses to the hyperoxic exposure during the last 3 min of the test. These values are somewhat higher than those observed under hypoxic conditions within the chamber. In part, this reflects the fact that the hyperoxic data were obtained at a somewhat higher PETCO2 than the hyperoxic data were, but it may also be related to the different techniques used to determine VE under the two conditions (inductance plethysmography in hypoxia and turbine flowmeter with mouthpiece and noseclip in hyperoxia). It can be see that in both hypoxic protocols, VE was elevated at 4 and 8 h (ANOVA, hypoxia by time, P < 0.001). On inspection of the data, there appeared to be a difference in general baseline between the four protocols. This was confirmed by ANOVA (hypoxia by drug, P < 0.05). However, there was no significant effect for the interaction between drug, hypoxia, and time, i.e., the drug did not affect the response over time to hypoxia.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.   VE, PETCO2, and PETO2 during acute (5-min) hyperoxia on the mouthpiece for the four protocols at t = 0, 4, and 8 h

VE during square waves of hypoxia. Figure 3 shows a typical breath-by-breath individual response to the square waves of hypoxia used to assess AHVR and the subsequent period of hyperoxia. In this figure, a vigorous ventilatory response to hypoxia is shown, together with the good control over PETO2 and PETCO2 that was achieved by using the end-tidal forcing system. Figure 4 shows the average of the first five (in some cases 4) square waves averaged for all 10 subjects at t = 0, 4, and 8 h for the four protocols. It is evident from this figure that, in both hypoxic protocols, both VE overall and the amplitude of the response to acute hypoxia were increased. Table 3 shows the corresponding values of Gp, Vc, tau , and td obtained from the model for each protocol.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Example of measurements of hypoxic sensitivity and VE during hyperoxia for 1 subject (breath-by-breath data). A: VE; B: PETO2; and C: PETCO2.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Average of VE (A), PETO2 (B), and PETCO2 (C) for the last 5 (in some cases, 4) square waves obtained during tests of hypoxic sensitivity (see Figs. 1 and 3), averaged for all 10 subjects during the 4 protocols. Solid line, t = 0; dashed line, t = 4 h; dotted line, t = 8 h.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3.   Parameters estimated for ventilatory model for acute response to hypoxia: for the 4 protocols at t = 0, 4, and 8 h

There was a significant increase over time in hypoxic sensitivity (Gp) in both hypoxic protocols (ANOVA, hypoxia by time, P < 0.001). However, propranolol did not significantly affect the change in hypoxic sensitivity in response to hypoxia over time.

Vc represents VE at 100% saturation. As such, it is notable that the calculated parameter from the model follows the same pattern as VE measured during hyperoxia, as described above. Just as in the case of the measured hyperventilation during hyperoxia, Vc significantly increased over time during the hypoxic exposure (ANOVA, hypoxia by time, P < 0.001), and there was a baseline difference between the protocols (ANOVA, hypoxia by drug, P < 0.05). Again, however, the drug did not significantly affect the response of Vc to hypoxia over time.

Sustained hypoxia significantly increased the time constant (tau ) which indicates the time taken for VE to reach a new steady-state level after the hypoxic step (ANOVA, hypoxia by time, P < 0.05), but propranolol had no significant effect on this parameter. Conversely, hypoxia significantly decreased the time delay (td) (ANOVA, hypoxia by time, P < 0.05), and propranolol seemed to have the effect of increasing td during both hypoxia and air control (ANOVA, P < 0.001) without abolishing the decrease seen during hypoxia.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The main finding of this study was that the early stages of the human ventilatory acclimatization to isocapnic hypoxia could not significantly be altered by beta -adrenergic blockade with propranolol. In particular, the following features associated with an 8-h exposure to isocapnic hypoxia (PETO2 = 50 Torr) were all unaffected by the drug: 1) the progressive increase in VE, 2) the persistent hyperventilation observed during short spells of hyperoxia, and 3) the increase in AHVR observed during short periods in which PETO2 was varied acutely.

Methodological considerations. Propranolol is a lipid-soluble, nonspecific, beta -adrenergic-receptor blocker capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier. Any effects seen could, therefore, have been brought about through peripheral or central mechanisms that act at beta 1- or beta 2-receptors. The dose of propranolol used in this study was the same as that used in various studies of cardiorespiratory responses at altitude (1, 21, 26-28). Bodem et al. (3) found that heart rate in humans was maximally blocked at an oral dose of propranolol of 200 mg/day, subdivided into doses given at 6-h intervals. This observation, coupled with the depression of heart rate that was observed in the present study (Table 1), suggests that the dose of propranolol employed was adequate for effective beta -blockade.

Isocapnic vs. poikilocapnic hypoxia. The exposure to hypoxia that was employed in this study was isocapnic, and the question arises, To what extent are the findings likely to be applicable to hypoxic exposures in which the PETCO2 is allowed to fall naturally, such as during travel to high altitude? As outlined in the introduction, the increases in both AHVR and residual VE under conditions of acute hyperoxia have been found to be similar, whether or not the hypoxic exposure was maintained isocapnic (18, 36). Thus the influence (or lack thereof) of beta -blockade is unlikely to be affected by the type of hypoxic exposure employed. More recent experiments have also found no difference between isocapnic and poikilocapnic exposures, even in the case of exposures lasting for 48 h (14, 37). These findings have also demonstrated that the increase in VE under conditions of acute hyperoxia arises through an increase in ventilatory sensitivity to CO2.

Comparison with other studies in humans. We are unaware of any studies directly comparable with the one presented in this paper, in which the focus has been on the early changes in the ventilatory acclimatization to isocapnic hypoxia and in which an attempt has been made to separate out different components of the respiratory response (AHVR, hyperoxic VE) which may be mediated by different mechanisms. Two studies have investigated ventilatory changes with and without beta -blockade during prolonged exposures to high altitude, i.e., during prolonged poikilocapnic hypoxia. Moore et al. (27) examined the ventilatory response of men to 15 days' residence at Pikes Peak (4,300 m) with and without beta -blockade (80 mg propranolol given every 8 h). Although there were differences in metabolic rate between the two groups, the progressive fall in PETCO2 over time between the groups was similar; this suggests that beta -blockade did not affect the process of ventilatory acclimatization to hypoxia. Asano et al. (1) also studied men on Pikes Peak, this time for 21 days with or without the same dose of propranolol as used by Moore et al. In the study by Asano et al., VE was not altered by the drug, but the ventilatory changes were related to urinary levels of norepinephrine. Therefore, these researchers suggested that there is a close link between ventilatory and sympathetic activation during hypoxia, but that this linkage is brought about by a non-beta -adrenergic mechanism.

Although the finding is rather peripheral to the purposes of the present study, we were unable to detect any effect of beta -blockade on the acute response to hypoxia at t = 0. This is in keeping with most other studies of the effect of beta -blockade on the acute ventilatory response to hypoxia (4, 16, 22, 30). Only one study was able to demonstrate a significant depression of VE with beta -blockade (100 mg bupranolol), during both air breathing and hypoxia (8). The authors suggested that VE increased less during hypoxia when the subjects received the beta -blocker, although this effect appears to have been small.

Other possible mechanisms related to autonomic activity. There are various other ways in which the autonomic nervous system could modulate ventilatory control during hypoxia that are not dependent on beta -adrenergic mechanisms. These include alpha -adrenergic mechanisms, central mechanisms independent of alpha - or beta -receptors, and parasympathetic mechanisms.

In relation to alpha -adrenergic mechanisms, in the cat there is evidence that alpha 2-receptors are present in the carotid body and that they exert inhibitory influences (23). Furthermore, the inhibitory effect associated with intracarotid infusions of an alpha 2-receptor agonist on the carotid body appeared to be attenuated or lost after the animal had undergone a 24- to 36-h exposure to hypoxia before the infusion (6). This suggests that there may be a downregulation of the alpha 2-adrenergic inhibitory mechanism during the ventilatory acclimatization to hypoxia. However, other studies in other species were unable to confirm this finding (33). Moreover, O'Regan (29) was unable to abolish the increase in chemoreceptor discharge in response to sympathetic stimulation of the chemosensory cells with either an alpha - or a beta -adrenergic blocker.

In relation to possible central mechanisms, adrenergic mechanisms are unlikely to play a role, because norepinephrine and epinephrine have been shown to exert a central depressant action on respiration (7). In the rat, however, it has been shown that chemoreceptor activation stimulates neurons in the rostral ventrolateral medulla, and that these neurons, in turn, innervate and activate preganglionic sympathetic neurons of the spinal chord (31); this demonstrates that there are central links between the peripheral chemoreceptors and the sympathetic nervous system.

It is unlikely that slow changes in the parasympathetic input to the carotid body cause slow increases in VE during prolonged hypoxia, because parasympathetic efferents have an inhibitory influence on carotid body discharge (34, 38), and this inhibition may be increased after prolonged exposure to hypoxia (24).


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank D. F. O'Connor for skilled technical assistance.


    FOOTNOTES

This work was funded by the Wellcome Trust. C. Clar held a Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Research Studentship.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Address for reprint requests: P. A. Robbins, Univ. Laboratory of Physiology, Univ. of Oxford, Parks Rd., Oxford OX1 3PT, UK (E-mail: peter.robbins{at}physiol.ox.ac.uk).

Received 29 July 1998; accepted in final form 1 February 1999.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1.   Asano, K., R. S. Mazzeo, R. E. McCullough, E. E. Wolfel, and J. T. Reeves. Relation of sympathetic activation to ventilation in man at 4,300 m altitude. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 68: 104-110, 1997[Medline].

2.   Bisgard, G. E., M. A. Busch, and H. V. Forster. Ventilatory acclimatization to hypoxia is not dependent on cerebral hypocapnic alkalosis. J. Appl. Physiol. 60: 1011-1015, 1986[Abstract/Free Full Text].

3.   Bodem, G., J. V. Weil, and C. A. Chidsey. Pharmacodynamic studies of beta-adrenergic antagonism induced in man by propranolol and practolol. J. Clin. Invest. 52: 747-754, 1973.

4.   Boutellier, U., and E. A. Koller. Propranolol and the respiratory, circulatory, and ECG responses to high altitude. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 46: 104-119, 1981.

5.   Busch, M. A., G. E. Bisgard, and H. V. Forster. Ventilatory acclimatization to hypoxia is not dependent on arterial hypoxemia. J. Appl. Physiol. 58: 1874-1880, 1985[Abstract/Free Full Text].

6.   Cao, H., Y. R. Kou, and N. R. Prabhakar. Absence of chemoreceptor inhibition by alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonist in cats exposed to low PO2 (Abstract). FASEB J. 5: A1118, 1991.

7.   Champagnat, J., M. Denavit-Saubie, J. L. Henry, and V. Leviel. Catecholaminergic depressant effects on bulbar respiratory mechanism. Brain Res. 160: 57-68, 1979[Medline].

8.   Chowanetz, W., P. ter Meer, and B. Jany. Der Einfluss von Bupranolol auf die hypoxische Atmungsstimulation bei Gesunden. Klin. Wochenschr. 65: 607-613, 1987[Medline].

9.   Clement, I. D., and P. A. Robbins. Dynamics of the ventilatory response to hypoxia in humans. Respir. Physiol. 92: 253-275, 1993[Medline].

10.   Cunningham, D. J. C., E. N. Hey, J. M. Patrick, and B. B. Lloyd. The effect of noradrenaline infusion on the relation between pulmonary ventilation and the alveolar PO2 and PCO2 in man. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 109: 756-770, 1963.

11.   Cunningham, W. L., E. J. Becker, and F. Kreuzer. Catecholamines in plasma and urine at high altitude. J. Appl. Physiol. 20: 607-610, 1965[Abstract/Free Full Text].

12.   Dempsey, J. A., E. B. Olson, Jr., and J. B. Skatrud. Hormones and neurochemicals in the regulation of breathing. In: Handbook of Physiology. The Respiratory System. Control of Breathing. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1986, sect. 3, vol. II, pt. 1, chapt. 7, p. 181-221.

13.   Dutton, K., B. A. Blanksby, and A. R. Morton. CO2 sensitivity changes during the menstrual cycle. J. Appl. Physiol. 67: 517-522, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

14.   Fatemian, M., and P. A. Robbins. Human ventilatory response to CO2 after 8 h of isocapnic or poikilocapnic hypoxia. J. Appl. Physiol. 85: 1922-1928, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

15.   Folgering, H., J. Ponte, and T. Sadig. Adrenergic mechanisms and chemoreception in the carotid body of the cat and rabbit. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 325: 1-22, 1982[Abstract/Free Full Text].

16.   Heistad, D. D., R. C. Wheeler, A. L. Mark, P. G. Schmid, and F. M. Abboud. Effects of adrenergic stimulation on ventilation in man. J. Clin. Invest. 51: 1469-1475, 1972.

17.   Howard, L. S. G. E., R. A. Barson, B. P. A. Howse, T. R. McGill, M. E. McIntyre, D. F. O'Connor, and P. A. Robbins. A chamber for controlling the end-tidal gas tensions over sustained periods in humans. J. Appl. Physiol. 78: 1088-1091, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

18.   Howard, L. S. G. E., and P. A. Robbins. Alterations in respiratory control during eight hours of isocapnic and poikilocapnic hypoxia in humans. J. Appl. Physiol. 78: 1098-1107, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

19.   Howard, L. S. G. E., and P. A. Robbins. The ventilatory response to eight hours of isocapnic and poikilocapnic hypoxia in humans. J. Appl. Physiol. 78: 1092-1097, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

20.   Howson, M. G., S. Khamnei, M. E. McIntyre, D. F. O'Connor, and P. A. Robbins. A rapid computer-controlled binary gas-mixing system for studies in respiratory control (Abstract). J. Physiol. (Lond.) 394: 7P, 1987.

21.   Hughson, R. L., Y. Yamamoto, R. E. McCullough, J. R. Sutton, and J. T. Reeves. Sympathetic and parasympathetic indicators of heart rate control at altitude studied by spectral analysis. J. Appl. Physiol. 77: 2537-2542, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

22.   Koller, E. A., S. Drechsel, T. Hess, P. Macherel, and U. Boutellier. Effects of atropine and propranolol on the respiratory, circulatory, and ECG responses to high altitude in man. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 57: 163-172, 1988.

23.   Kou, Y. R., P. Ensberger, P. A. Cragg, N. S. Cherniack, and N. R. Prabhakar. Role of alpha 2-adrenergic receptors in the carotid body response to isocapnic hypoxia. Respir. Physiol. 83: 353-364, 1991[Medline].

24.   Lahiri, S., N. Smatresk, M. Pokorski, P. Barnard, and A. Mokashi. Efferent inhibition of carotid body chemoreception in chronically hypoxic cats. Am. J. Physiol. 245 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 14): R678-R683, 1983[Abstract/Free Full Text].

25.   Mazzeo, R. S., A. Child, G. E. Butterfield, J. T. Mawson, S. Zamudio, and L. G. Moore. Catecholamine response during 12 days of high-altitude exposure (4,300 m) in women. J. Appl. Physiol. 84: 1151-1157, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

26.   Mazzeo, R. S., E. E. Wolfel, G. E. Butterfield, and J. T. Reeves. Sympathetic responses during 21 days at high altitude (4,300 m) as determined by urinary and arterial catecholamines. Metabolism 43: 1226-1232, 1994[Medline].

27.   Moore, L. G., A. Cymerman, S.-Y. Huang, R. E. McCullough, R. G. McCullough, P. B. Rock, A. Young, P. M. Young, J. V. Weil, and J. T. Reeves. Propranolol blocks metabolic increase but not ventilatory acclimatization to 4,300 m. Respir. Physiol. 70: 195-204, 1987[Medline].

28.   Moore, L. G., A. Cymerman, H. Shao-Yung, R. E. McCullough, R. G. McCullough, P. B. Rock, A. Young, P. M. Young, D. Bloedow, J. V. Weil, and J. T. Reeves. Propranolol does not impair exercise oxygen uptake in normal men at high altitude. J. Appl. Physiol. 61: 1935-1941, 1986[Abstract/Free Full Text].

29.   O'Regan, R. G. Responses of carotid body chemosensory activity and blood flow to stimulation of sympathetic nerves in the cat. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 315: 81-98, 1981[Abstract/Free Full Text].

30.   Patrick, J. M., J. Tutty, and S. B. Pearson. Propranolol and the ventilatory response to hypoxia and hypercapnia in normal man. Clin. Sci. Mol. Med. 55: 491-497, 1978[Medline].

31.   Reis, D. J., E. V. Golanov, D. A. Ruggiero, and M.-K. Sun. Sympatho-excitatory neurons of the rostral ventrolateral medulla are oxygen sensors and essential elements in the tonic and reflex control of the systemic and cerebral circulations. J. Hypertens. 12, Suppl. 10: S159-S180, 1994.

32.   Robbins, P. A., G. D. Swanson, and M. G. Howson. A prediction-correction scheme for forcing alveolar gases along certain time courses. J. Appl. Physiol. 52: 1353-1357, 1982[Abstract/Free Full Text].

33.   Ryan, M. L., M. S. Hedrick, J. Pizarro, and G. E. Bisgard. Carotid body noradrenergic sensitivity in ventilatory acclimatization to hypoxia. Respir. Physiol. 92: 77-90, 1993[Medline].

34.   Sampson, S. R. Pharmacology of feedback inhibition of carotid body chemoreceptors in the cat. In: The Peripheral Arterial Chemoreceptors. Proceedings of an International Workshop, edited by M. J. Purves. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1975, p. 207-217.

35.   Severinghaus, J. W. Simple, accurate equations for human blood O2 dissociation computations. J. Appl. Physiol. 46: 599-602, 1979[Abstract/Free Full Text].

36.   Tansley, J. G., C. Clar, M. E. F. Pedersen, and P. A. Robbins. Human ventilatory response to acute hyperoxia during and after 8 h of both isocapnic and poikilocapnic hypoxia. J. Appl. Physiol. 82: 513-519, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

37.   Tansley, J. G., M. Fatemian, L. S. G. E. Howard, M. J. Poulin, and P. A. Robbins. Changes in ventilatory control during and after 48 h of both isocapnic and poikilocapnic hypoxia. J. Appl. Physiol. 84: 431-434, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

38.   Wang, Z.-Z., L. J. Stensaas, B. G. Dinger, and S. J. Fidone. Nitric oxide mediates chemoreceptor inhibition in the cat carotid body. Neuroscience 65: 217-229, 1995[Medline].


J APPL PHYSIOL 86(6):1897-1904
8570-7587/99 $5.00 Copyright © 1999 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
C. Liu, T. G. Smith, G. M. Balanos, J. Brooks, A. Crosby, M. Herigstad, K. L. Dorrington, and P. A. Robbins
Lack of involvement of the autonomic nervous system in early ventilatory and pulmonary vascular acclimatization to hypoxia in humans
J. Physiol., February 15, 2007; 579(1): 215 - 225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
J. A L Calbet
Chronic hypoxia increases blood pressure and noradrenaline spillover in healthy humans
J. Physiol., August 15, 2003; 551(1): 379 - 386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clar, C.
Right arrow Articles by Robbins, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clar, C.
Right arrow Articles by Robbins, P. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online