Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 86: 1583-1587, 1999;
8750-7587/99 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ray, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ray, C. A.
Vol. 86, Issue 5, 1583-1587, May 1999

Sympathetic adaptations to one-legged training

Chester A. Ray

Cardiovascular Center and Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242; and Departments of Medicine and of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The purpose of the present study was to determine the effect of leg exercise training on sympathetic nerve responses at rest and during dynamic exercise. Six men were trained by using high-intensity interval and prolonged continuous one-legged cycling 4 day/wk, 40 min/day, for 6 wk. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA; peroneal nerve) were measured during 3 min of upright dynamic one-legged knee extensions at 40 W before and after training. After training, peak oxygen uptake in the trained leg increased 19 ± 2% (P < 0.01). At rest, heart rate decreased from 77 ± 3 to 71 ± 6 beats/min (P < 0.01) with no significant changes in MAP (91 ± 7 to 91 ± 11 mmHg) and MSNA (29 ± 3 to 28 ± 1 bursts/min). During exercise, both heart rate and MAP were lower after training (108 ± 5 to 96 ± 5 beats/min and 132 ± 8 to 119 ± 4 mmHg, respectively, during the third minute of exercise; P < 0.01). MSNA decreased similarly from rest during the first 2 min of exercise both before and after training. However, MSNA was significantly less during the third minute of exercise after training (32 ± 2 to 22 ± 3 bursts/min; P < 0.01). This training effect on MSNA remained when MSNA was expressed as bursts per 100 heartbeats. Responses to exercise in five untrained control subjects were not different at 0 and 6 wk. These results demonstrate that exercise training prolongs the decrease in MSNA during upright leg exercise and indicates that attenuation of MSNA to exercise reported with forearm training also occurs with leg training.

muscle sympathetic nerve activity; microneurography; muscle reflexes; exercise


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

A REDUCTION in muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) at rest and during exercise may contribute importantly to training-induced reductions in arterial pressure at rest and increases in vascular conductance during exercise. However, little information exists concerning training-induced adaptations of MSNA. Exercising MSNA responses after training indicate an attenuation in sympathetic outflow (12, 15-17). However, these studies have exclusively examined forearm exercise. Furthermore, most of these studies have examined mainly responses to isometric exercise (12, 15, 17) with only one study examining MSNA responses to dynamic exercise (16). Whether these training adaptations in sympathetic outflow during arm exercise can be extrapolated to dynamic leg exercise is unclear. This concern is particularly relevant because we have previously shown that arm and leg exercise can elicit markedly different MSNA responses (9, 10). Moreover, it is well recognized that isometric contractions performed at the same intensity and duration as dynamic contraction produce greater MSNA responses (11, 19). With this background, the primary goal of the present study was to determine the influence of dynamic leg training on exercising MSNA during dynamic leg exercise.

Additionally, training adaptations on resting MSNA remain equivocal. Cross-sectional studies indicate no effect (13, 18) or an increase (8, 16) in resting MSNA after training, whereas longitudinal studies have reported increases (15), decreases (5), and no change in resting MSNA (14, 17, 18). Thus a secondary goal of this study was to examine the effect of dynamic leg training on resting MSNA.


    METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Subjects

We studied 11 healthy, untrained, male volunteers, aged 19-23 yr. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects, and the study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Iowa.

Experimental Design

MSNA, heart rate, and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured at rest and during 3 min of dynamic one-legged knee extensions (DKE) at 40 W in the sitting position before and after 6 wk of a one-legged exercise conditioning paradigm. One-legged peak oxygen uptake (VO2 peak) was also determined before and after training.

Training Protocol

The subjects were trained by using one-legged cycling in the sitting position for a total of 6 wk. Each subject attended four exercise sessions per week. During two sessions, the subject performed unloaded cycling for 3 min and then cycled for 5 min at a work rate that elicited 90-100% of VO2 peak. This pattern was repeated five times. During the other two sessions, the subject cycled for 40 min at a work rate that could be maintained throughout the exercise period (~70% of VO2 peak). The work rate was adjusted as the subject's physical work capacity improved so that a constant heart rate was maintained during the training bouts. Five subjects did not train and served as experimental control subjects.

Measurements

Microneurography. Multifiber recordings of MSNA were made with a tungsten microelectrode inserted in the peroneal nerve at the head of the fibula of a resting leg. A reference electrode was placed subcutaneously 2-3 cm from the recording electrode. Adjustments of the recording electrode were made until sites were found in which clear spontaneously occurring sympathetic bursts were recorded. The criteria for acceptable recordings of MSNA were as reported previously (21). The nerve signal was amplified (40,000-80,000 times), fed through a band-pass filter with a bandwidth of 700-2,000 Hz, and passed through a resistance-capacitance integrating network with a time constant of 0.1 s to obtain a mean voltage display of the nerve activity. The mean voltage neurograms were displayed together with the electrocardiogram, arterial pressure, respiratory pattern, and force output from arm exercise on a chart recorder (Gould ES2000) at a paper speed of 5 mm/s and an online computer. The nerve traffic was also routed to a storage oscilloscope and a loudspeaker for monitoring during the study.

Heart rate was derived from an electrocardiogram and arterial pressure was measured continuously by a finger cuff (Finapres, Ohmeda, Englewood, CO). To ensure that subjects avoided respiratory maneuvers that may affect sympathetic activity during interventions, respiratory patterns were monitored with the aid of a strain gauge strapped around the chest.

VO2 peak was measured via a metabolic cart (Medical Graphic 2001) that was calibrated with known gases before all tests. The same testing protocol was used before and after training. Initially, the subjects cycled for 2 min at ~40% of an estimated VO2 peak. Then the subjects cycled for 2 min at a work rate estimated to elicit ~70% VO2 peak and for 2 min at a work rate estimated to elicit 100% of VO2 peak. After 5 min of recovery, the subjects cycled for as long as possible at a work rate 24 W greater than they attained at the final work bout. If the increase in oxygen uptake was >150 ml/min above the maximal value obtained on the graded test, an additional work bout was conducted after a 5-min recovery period.

Data Analysis

Records of MSNA were divided into 1-min periods for statistical analysis. Sympathetic bursts were identified by inspection of the mean voltage neurogram. The significance of difference among means for the measured variables at rest and during DKE was evaluated with a two-way [exercise (time) and training (before and after)] within-subject repeated-measures ANOVA. When a significant interaction was found, simple-effect tests were performed at each time point. A significance level of P < 0.05 was used for all tests. Values are presented in text and Figs. 1 and 2 as means ± SE.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The one-legged training regimen elicited a 19 ± 2% increase VO2 peak in the trained leg. VO2 peak increased from 2.36 ± 0.1 to 2.78 ± 0.1 l/min. Heart rate was lower at rest after training (77 ± 3 to 71 ± 6 beats/min; P < 0.01; Fig. 1). However, MAP and MSNA were unchanged at rest after training (Fig. 1). Training resulted in a significantly lower heart rate and MAP during DKE (Fig. 1). During the final minute of DKE, heart rate was 12 beats/min lower and MAP was 13 mmHg lower after training than before. Before training, MSNA was significantly decreased from baseline during the first minute of DKE (29 ± 3 to 22 ± 2 bursts/min; P < 0.01) followed by a return to baseline during the remaining 2 min (Fig. 1). After one-legged training, MSNA decreased during the first minute of DKE as before training (28 ± 1 to 19 ± 1 bursts/min; P < 0.01; Fig. 1). However, unlike before training, MSNA did not returned to baseline during the final 2 min of DKE but remained significantly below baseline (23 ± 1 and 22 ± 3 bursts/min for second and third minute, respectively; Fig. 1). The results for MSNA were unchanged when expressed as bursts per 100 heartbeats. The only significant difference remained during the third minute of exercise (29 ± 2 and 23 ± 2 bursts/100 heartbeats for before and after training, respectively). Figure 2 shows recordings of MSNA before and after 6 wk of one-legged cycle training from one subject. There were no significant changes (main effects or interaction) for any cardiovascular variables in the control group. VO2 peak was also unchanged in the control group (2.58 ± 0.1 to 2.57 ± 0.1 l/min, respectively).


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Changes in muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), heart rate, and mean arterial pressure (MAP) during dynamic knee extensions at 40 W before (open circle ) and after () 6 wk of 1-legged cycle training * Significantly different from baseline, P < 0.01. dagger  Before and after significantly different at P < 0.01; § P < 0.06.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Original recordings of MSNA from 1 subject during baseline and third minute of dynamic knee extensions at 40 W before and after 6 wk of 1-legged cycle training. Nos. above recording segments are no. of sympathetic bursts per minute.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The present study examined the effect of dynamic leg training on resting and exercising MSNA. The results of the study indicate that endurance training does not alter resting MSNA but does attenuate increases in MSNA during dynamic leg exercise. The present study is unique in that MSNA responses to training were measured during dynamic leg exercise. Until this time, all training studies examining MSNA have used forearm exercise. However, the most common mode of endurance (cardiovascular) training uses the legs (i.e., running, jogging). This study supports the concept that endurance training can attenuate MSNA responses to exercise and extends it to leg exercise and training.

MSNA Responses to DKE Before Training

The pattern of decline in MSNA during this sitting DKE model is similar to that reported in an earlier study by our group (10). In this previous report, we presented evidence suggesting that DKE in the upright position increased central filling pressure and activated the cardiopulmonary baroreflex (10). The decrease in MSNA was not related to the engagement of the arterial baroreflex because DKE performed in the supine position elicited a comparable arterial pressure response but with no decrease in MSNA (10). Similarly, because identical work rates were used in both the upright and supine positions, central command would have been expected to be similar and not have contributed to the decrease in MSNA.

The increase in MSNA during the third minute of DKE appears to be related to the activation of muscle reflexes (i.e., muscle metaboreflex) that override the inhibitory effects of the cardiopulmonary reflex. This assumption is based on the time delay of the increase in MSNA during DKE. It might be argued that central command contributed to the increase in MSNA during the third minute of DKE because muscular fatigue becomes more evident and greater volitional effort is needed. However, central command is generally not believed to play a major role in increasing MSNA during exercise with the possible exception of very high-intensity exercise (20). It should be recognized that this conclusion is based on small-muscle-mass exercise (i.e., forearm exercise). The effect central command on MSNA during large muscle mass exercise is not known.

MSNA Response to DKE After Training

MSNA responses were similar during the first 2 min of DKE after training. However, MSNA remained suppressed during the third minute of DKE after training, unlike the increase in MSNA observed before training. One possible explanation for the attenuation in MSNA is decrease activation of muscle reflexes. Decreased activation of the muscle metaboreflex after training has been demonstrated by Somers et al. (17). They found that rhythmic handgrip training attenuated MSNA responses during isometric handgrip and posthandgrip muscle ischemia. Mostoufi-Moab et al. (7) found support for training-induced attenuation of the muscle metaboreflex with dynamic forearm exercise training. They found MAP responses to be attenuated during ischemic handgrip induced by positive pressure at 50 mmHg around the forearm after training. Additionally, they found lower venous lactate concentrations and muscle acidosis of the exercising forearm.

Changes to the muscle mechanoreflex may have also contributed to decrease in MSNA during DKE after endurance training. Sinoway et al. (15) found that the increase in MSNA during a 30-min bout of rhythmic handgrip at 25% maximal voluntary contraction was attenuated after 4 wk of training. In this study they concluded that the decrease was related to a desensitization of muscle mechanoreceptors. This was based on an earlier finding that showed increases in MSNA during 30 min of rhythmic handgrip were not related to the activation the muscle metaboreflex (2). Rhythmic handgrip did not lead to changes in muscle acidosis and H2PO4, and MSNA was not elevated during posthandgrip muscle ischemia. However, the failure for MSNA to change during the first 2 min of DKE after training makes this mechanism less viable.

It might be speculated that changes in the cardiopulmonary reflex after training might contribute to the change in MSNA during leg exercise. DiCarlo and Bishop (3) have reported that exercise training enhances cardiac afferents' sympathoinhibition in the rabbit (3). However, if this were the case, it would be expected that MSNA would be altered at rest and, more importantly, during the first and second minute of DKE in addition to the third minute of DKE.

Despite not having any measurement of volitional effort, it could be argued that central command was less after training on the basis of reports from subjects that the exercise bouts were much easier to perform. A lower central command after training may have contributed to the suppression on MSNA during the third minute of DKE. However, as stated earlier, central command is not expected to have an effect during DKE.

Effect of Training on Arterial Pressure

Increase muscle oxidative capacity is associated with endurance training (4, 6). The attenuated blood pressure response to DKE after training may be related to an increase oxidative capacity of the quadriceps muscle after training. Wilson et al. (22) found a decreased pressor response to isometric contraction with the gastrocnemius after 21 days of low-frequency electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve. Chronic electrical stimulation in that study greatly enhanced the oxidative capacity of the muscle as measured by increased citrate synthase and succinate dehydrogenase activity. The lower MAP during DKE, particularly during the third minute, may be related to the lower MSNA that resulted from a decrease in metabosensitive muscle afferent activity after training. Moreover, decreased muscle afferent discharge from both group III and IV afferents may occur during dynamic exercise after training. Support for this concept comes from the work of Adreani and Kaufman (1). They found that the discharge of both group III and IV muscle afferents during dynamic exercise increased when arterial flow was occluded. They concluded that both group III and IV muscle afferents are sensitive to some unspecified substance produced by the muscle during dynamic exercise. If exercise training attenuates the production of this unknown substance, group III and IV muscle afferent activity would be expected to decrease and attenuate MSNA and blood pressure.

Effect of Training on Resting MSNA

Longitudinal training studies report increases (15), decreases (5), and no change (5, 14, 16-18) in resting MSNA. Most of these studies have used dynamic exercise as the training mode. One-legged training in the present study produced a significant increase in VO2 peak (19%) in the trained leg but failed to alter resting MSNA. The lack of a change in resting MSNA may be due to the limited muscle mass used in the training regimen. Grassi et al. (5) reported a significant decrease in resting MSNA after 10 wk of running. MSNA decreased from 21 to 14 bursts/min after training. Training elicited a 16% increase in maximal oxygen uptake. However, Sheldahl and co-workers (14) and Svedenhag et al. (18) reported no change in resting MSNA after 8-12 wk of two-legged cycle training that elicited a ~17 and ~7% increase in VO2 peak, respectively. These two studies would argue against muscle mass being a factor. It appears likely that longer aerobic training periods (e.g., >1 yr) are needed to consistently decrease resting MSNA. It should be noted that long-term resistance training may produce an increase in resting MSNA on the basis of greater resting MSNA in bodybuilders compared with sedentary controls (15).

In summary, 6 wk of dynamic one-legged training failed to alter resting MSNA but did prolong the decrease in MSNA during leg exercise. It appears that the continued suppression of MSNA during DKE after training is related to an attenuation of the muscle metaboreflex that, subsequently, prevents it from overriding the sympathoinhibitory effect of the cardiopulmonary baroreflex. The present study indicates that attenuation of MSNA to exercise reported with forearm training also occurs with leg training.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The author extends appreciation to Mary Clary, William Pace, and William Rizk for technical assistance; Allyn L. Mark for support of this project; and Drs. J. Kevin Shoemaker and Lawrence Sinoway for critical review.


    FOOTNOTES

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants HL-24962 and HL-36224 to A. L. Mark and by NIH Grants AR-44571 and HL-58503 and National Aeronautics and Space Administration Grant NAG 9-1034 to C. A. Ray.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Address for reprint requests: C. A. Ray, Pennsylvania State College of Medicine, The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Sect. of Cardiology H047, 500 Univ. Dr., Hershey, PA 17033-2390 (E-mail: caray{at}psu.edu).

Received 4 November 1998; accepted in final form 30 December 1998.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1.   Adreani, C. M., and M. P. Kaufman. Effect of arterial occlusion on responses of group III and IV afferents to dynamic exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 84: 1827-1833, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

2.   Batman, B. A., J. C. Hardy, U. A. Leuenberger, M. B. Smith, Q. X. Yang, and L. I. Sinoway. Sympathetic nerve activity during prolonged rhythmic forearm exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 76: 1077-1081, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

3.   DiCarlo, S. E., and V. S. Bishop. Exercise training enhances cardiac afferent inhibition of baroreflex function. Am. J. Physiol. 258 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 27): H212-H220, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].

4.   Gollnick, P. D., and D. W. King. Effect of exercise and training on mitochondria of rat skeletal muscle. Am. J. Physiol. 216: 1502-1509, 1969.

5.   Grassi, G., G. Seravalle, D. A. Calhoun, and G. Mancia. Physical training and baroreceptor control of sympathetic nerve activity in humans. Hypertension 23: 294-301, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

6.   Holloszy, J. O. Biochemical adaptations in muscle. Effects of exercise on mitochondrial oxygen uptake and respiratory enzyme activity in skeletal muscle. J. Biol. Chem. 242: 2278-2282, 1967[Abstract/Free Full Text].

7.   Mostoufi-Moab, S., E. J. Widmaier, J. A. Cornett, K. Gray, and L. I. Sinoway. Forearm training reduces the exercise pressor reflex during ischemic rhythmic handgrip. J. Appl. Physiol. 84: 277-283, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

8.   Ng, A. V., R. Callister, D. G. Johnson, and D. R. Seals. Endurance exercise training is associated with elevated basal sympathetic nerve activity in healthy older humans. J. Appl. Physiol. 77: 1366-1374, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

9.   Ray, C. A., R. F. Rea, M. P. Clary, and A. L. Mark. Muscle sympathetic nerve responses to static leg exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 73: 1523-1529, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

10.   Ray, C. A., R. F. Rea, M. P. Clary, and A. L. Mark. Muscle sympathetic nerve responses to dynamic one-legged exercise: effect of body posture. Am. J. Physiol. 264 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 33): H1-H7, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

11.   Saito, M., S. Iwase, and T. Mano. Different responses of muscle sympathetic nerve activity to sustained and rhythmic handgrip exercises. Jpn. J. Physiol. 36: 1053-1057, 1986[Medline].

12.   Saito, M., H. Watanabe, and T. Mano. Comparison of muscle sympathetic nerve activity during exercise in dominant and nondominant forearm. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 66: 108-115, 1993.

13.   Seals, D. R. Sympathetic neural adjustments to stress in physically trained and untrained humans. Hypertension 17: 36-43, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

14.   Sheldahl, L. M., T. J. Ebert, B. Cox, and F. E. Tristani. Effect of aerobic training on baroreflex regulation of cardiac and sympathetic function. J. Appl. Physiol. 76: 158-165, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

15.   Sinoway, L. I., R. F. Rea, T. J. Mosher, M. B. Smith, and A. L. Mark. Hydrogen ion concentration is not the sole determinant of muscle metaboreceptor responses in humans. J. Clin. Invest. 89: 1875-1884, 1992.

16.   Sinoway, L., J. Shenberger, G. Leaman, R. Zelis, K. Gray, R. Baily, and U. Leuenberger. Forearm training attenuates sympathetic responses to prolonged rhythmic forearm exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 81: 1778-1784, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

17.   Somers, V. K., K. C. Leo, R. Shields, M. Clary, and A. L. Mark. Forearm endurance training attenuates sympathetic nerve response to isometric handgrip in normal humans. J. Appl. Physiol. 72: 1039-1043, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

18.   Svedenhag, J., B. G. Wallin, G. Sundlof, and J. Henriksson. Skeletal muscle sympathetic activity at rest in trained and untrained subjects. Acta Physiol. Scand. 120: 499-504, 1984[Medline].

19.   Victor, R. G., D. R. Seals, and A. L. Mark. Differential control of heart rate and sympathetic nerve activity during dynamic exercise. Insight from intraneural recordings in humans. J. Clin. Invest. 79: 508-516, 1987.

20.   Victor, R. G., N. H. Secher, T. Lyson, and J. H. Mitchell. Central command increases muscle sympathetic nerve activity during intense intermittent isometric exercise in humans. Circ. Res. 76: 127-131, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

21.   Wallin, B. G., and J. Fagius. Peripheral sympathetic neural activity in conscious humans. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 50: 565-576, 1988[Medline].

22.   Wilson, L. B., C. K. Dyke, D. Parsons, P. T. Wall, J. A. Pawelczyk, R. S. Williams, and J. H. Mitchell. Effect of skeletal muscle fiber type on the pressor response evoked by static contraction in rabbits. J. Appl. Physiol. 79: 1744-1752, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].


J APPL PHYSIOL 86(5):1583-1587
8570-7587/99 $5.00 Copyright © 1999 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
D. W. Wray, A. J. Donato, S. K. Nishiyama, and R. S. Richardson
Acute sympathetic vasoconstriction at rest and during dynamic exercise in cyclists and sedentary humans
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2007; 102(2): 704 - 712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
E V Lambert, A St Clair Gibson, and T D Noakes
Complex systems model of fatigue: integrative homoeostatic control of peripheral physiological systems during exercise in humans
Br. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2005; 39(1): 52 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
D. N. Proctor, J. D. Miller, N. M. Dietz, C. T. Minson, and M. J. Joyner
Reduced submaximal leg blood flow after high-intensity aerobic training
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2001; 91(6): 2619 - 2627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
C. A. Ray and D. I. Carrasco
Isometric handgrip training reduces arterial pressure at rest without changes in sympathetic nerve activity
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2000; 279(1): H245 - H249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ray, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ray, C. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online