Vol. 86, Issue 4, 1396-1401, April 1999
Effect of upper airway negative pressure on proprioceptive
afferents from the tongue
A.
Brancatisano1,
P.
Davis2,
T.
van der
Touw1, and
J. R.
Wheatley1
1 Department of Respiratory
Medicine, University of Sydney, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New
South Wales 2145; and 2 Faculty of
Health Sciences, University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
 |
ABSTRACT |
We examined
whether receptors in the tongue muscle respond to negative upper airway
pressure (NUAP). In six cats, one hypoglossal nerve was cut and its
distal end was prepared for single-fiber recording. Twelve afferent
fibers were selected for study on the basis of their sensitivity to
passive stretch (PS) of the tongue. Fiber discharge frequency was
measured during PS of the tongue and after the rapid onset of constant
NUAP. During PS of 1-3 cm, firing frequency increased from 17 ± 7 to 40 ± 11 (SE) Hz (P < 0.01). In addition, 8 of the 12 fibers responded to NUAP (
10 to
30 cmH2O), with firing
frequency increasing from 23 ± 9 to 41 ± 9 Hz
(P < 0.001). In two fibers tested,
the increase in firing frequency in response to NUAP was not altered by
topical anesthesia (10% lignocaine) applied liberally to the entire
upper airway mucosa. Our results demonstrate that afferent discharges
from the hypoglossal nerve are elicited by
1) stretching of the tongue and
2) NUAP before and after upper
airway anesthesia. We speculate that activation of proprioceptive
mechanoreceptors in the cat's tongue provides an additional pathway
for the reflex activation of upper airway dilator muscles in response
to NUAP, independent of superficially located mucosal mechanoreceptors.
upper airway control; hypoglossal nerve; muscle
spindles
 |
INTRODUCTION |
PREVIOUS STUDIES have demonstrated that negative
pressure applied to the upper airway of animals and humans causes
reflex activation of a number of upper airway dilator muscles,
including the alae nasi (22), genioglossus (10, 15, 16, 22),
cricothyroid (14), posterior cricoarytenoid (14, 22), sternohyoid and sternothyroid (14), and soft palate muscles (21). It has been proposed
that upper airway muscle recruitment by negative pressure protects the
upper airway against collapse from negative intraluminal pressures (14,
22). Although the precise afferent pathways for these reflexes have not
been determined, pressure-sensitive mechanoreceptors in the upper
airway have been demonstrated to respond to negative airway pressure
(11, 12, 15, 16, 19). Furthermore, many of these receptors are
superficial (located in the mucosal and submucosal tissues), because
they are affected by local anesthesia (9, 14). However, a role for more
deeply located pressure receptors (i.e., within muscle tissue) is not precluded. Negative upper airway pressure (NUAP) may activate muscle
mechanoreceptors by stretching and deforming muscle tissue. Hence, an
alternate group of nonsuperficial upper airway receptors could
participate in the detection of NUAP. In addition, these muscle mechanoreceptors may be important in the reflex response of
individual upper airway muscles to NUAP. This mechanism would permit
upper airway muscles to respond differentially to the same negative
pressure, with the stimulated activity partially dependent on the level
of local mechanoreceptor activation. However, there is no information
concerning the afferent nerve traffic arising from such
mechanoreceptors in upper airway muscles when they are stimulated by NUAP.
By recording from the hypoglossal nerve (motor-sensory nerve to the
tongue muscles), we examined the role of NUAP in stimulation of muscle
receptors from the tongue. The tongue muscle was selected for study on
the basis of its recognized importance in the control and maintenance
of upper airway patency, because of the relative accessibility of the
hypoglossal nerve, and because the hypoglossal nerve does not carry
sensory information from mucosal surfaces in the upper airway.
 |
METHODS |
Studies were performed on six anesthetized, paralyzed (gallamine
trithiodide, 4 mg/kg iv) and mechanically ventilated supine adult cats
[weight 3.0 ± 0.8 (±SD) kg]. After animals were
premedicated with acetylpromazine (0.2 mg/kg im), general anesthesia
was induced by placing the animal in a box filled with a mixture of
halothane and 100% oxygen delivered by a ventilatory pump. After
anesthesia was induced, the halothane circuit was switched to a face
mask so that anesthesia could be maintained while femoral venous and arterial catheters were inserted for the systemic administration of
saline, anesthetics, and paralyzing agents and for the measurement of
arterial blood pressure. Thiopentone sodium (10-20 mg/kg iv) was
then injected to allow insertion of an endotracheal tube, which was
used for the subsequent continued administration of halothane. Rectal
temperature was monitored and maintained at 37.5-38.5°C by
using an infrared lamp. End-tidal
CO2 was monitored with an infrared
gas analyzer (Morgan 901) and was maintained at 4-5% by adjusting
ventilation. Arterial blood pressure (±200 cmH2O pressure transducer;
Celesco) and heart rate were continuously monitored as indexes of the
depth of anesthesia. The investigation was approved by the University
of Sydney Animal Care and Ethics Committee.
A tracheostomy was performed, and the caudal tracheal end was connected
to a halothane gas-anesthetic circuit and ventilator, while the
laryngeal end was connected to a pressure transducer (±50
cmH2O; Celesco) to record upper
airway pressure (Fig. 1). The esophagus was
ligated, and the upper airway was sealed by placing a specially
constructed plastic mask (made airtight with petroleum jelly) over the
cat's nose and mouth. Negative pressure was delivered to the sealed
upper airway via a perforated catheter placed through the face mask to
enter the mouth. The other end of the catheter was connected to a large
volume (23 liters) pressure reservoir via a solenoid valve. A suction
pump was used to generate negative pressure within the reservoir; the
level of negative pressure was monitored by using a differential
pressure transducer (±50
cmH2O; Celesco). Activation of the
solenoid valve delivered a step change of negative pressure to the
isolated and sealed upper airway. The system caused a step change in
upper airway pressure, with a response time of 10 ms, to achieve 90%
equilibration of pressure. A nylon ligature was passed through the face
mask via an airtight rubber seal and was sutured to the tip of the tongue. The distal end of the ligature was then connected to a displacement transducer (model 305B, Cambridge Technology, Watertown, MA) to permit the measurement of tongue stretching.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Schematic diagram of isolated and sealed upper airway in supine cat.
Animals were mechanically ventilated via the tracheostomy. Negative
pressure was applied to upper airway via a perforated tube placed in
the mouth. Tongue was stretched by using a displacement transducer.
|
|
Hypoglossal nerve isolation.
The hypoglossal nerve was dissected free from where it crossed the
carotid artery, and it was sectioned just caudal to where it branches
to the tongue muscles. The distal end of the medial division of the
hypoglossal nerve was placed on a small platform in a warm (37°C)
paraffin pool. The length of nerve was then desheathed by using
watchmaker's forceps, with the aid of a dissecting microscope, and
small strands of the nerve were dissected free. Strands were placed on
a pair of platinum electrodes connected to an alternating current-coupled amplifier (JRAK Biosignals, Sydney,
Australia). The signal was filtered (1 Hz to 10 kHz),
amplified, and displayed on an oscilloscope with audio output from a
loudspeaker. Progressively smaller strands were teased from the nerve
until a filament containing one active fiber was obtained.
Neural activity [electroneurogram (ENG)], NUAP, tongue
displacement, end-tidal CO2, and
blood pressure were recorded on a seven-channel pulse-code modulated
system (Vetter 3000A), and digitized for on-line display and recording
with the use of a Macintosh IIX computer running MacLab software.
Experimental protocol.
Single fibers were selected for study only if they were sensitive to
manual stretching of the tongue via its attached ligature. Tongue tip
displacements of known magnitude (between 1 and 3 cm) were then made
(beginning from the resting position of the tongue) by using the
displacement transducer attached to the tongue ligature. After this,
the same mechanoreceptive fiber was tested for its sensitivity to step
changes in negative pressure, ranging from
5 to
30
cmH2O, that were applied to the
upper airway. The duration of tongue displacement and negative pressure
varied from 2 to 10 s. At least three runs were performed for each
fiber at each displacement and negative pressure level. In one cat, the
study was repeated for two fibers after topical anesthesia (10%
lignocaine) was applied liberally to the entire upper airway mucosa.
This application consisted of the upper airway's being completely
filled with 10 ml of lignocaine for at least 10 min.
Data analysis.
The ENG and other signals recorded on the pulse-code modulated system
were analyzed off-line after the study. The frequency of ENG discharge
was measured at increasing tongue displacements, ranging from 1 to 3 cm, and at different levels of negative pressure, ranging from
5
to
30 cmH2O, by using a
custom-written computer program (ASYST 3.0, Clinical Engineering
Solutions) which detected interspike intervals. Values of firing
frequency were obtained during steady-state fiber discharge. For each
fiber, duplicate runs were analyzed for each displacement and negative
pressure level.
The data from all fibers for tongue displacement and negative pressure
at all levels were expressed as means ± SE. Because of technical
difficulties in making continuous recordings from the single fibers, we
obtained a complete set of data in only two fibers in one cat at all
levels of tongue displacement and negative pressure.
Statistical comparisons were made by using the Student's
t-test for paired data.
P < 0.05 was considered significant.
 |
RESULTS |
In six cats, 12 afferent nerve fibers were selected for study on the
basis of a positive ENG response to passive stretch (PS) of the tongue.
Seven of the 12 fibers were tonically active (Fig. 2) and the remaining five were silent in
the absence of stimulation (Fig. 3). In
response to a constant stretch of the tongue, there was an initial
burst of activity which then decreased to a steady rate of discharge
above the control level (Fig. 2). The initial burst of activity
occurred more frequently at the larger displacements. During
steady-state PS of between 1 and 3 cm, firing frequency increased in
the group as a whole from 17 ± 7 to 40 ± 11 Hz (Fig. 4; P < 0.01).
Afferent activity was transiently inhibited after the removal of PS but
then returned to control levels (Fig. 2).

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Example of afferent activity of a single hypoglossal nerve fiber
recorded in response to a step increase in tongue displacement.
Top: raw electroneurographic (ENG)
activity from the fiber. Middle:
instantaneous firing frequency of the fiber.
Bottom: tongue displacement. Note
tonic discharge of single fiber before stimulus. In response to a
constant displacement of the tongue, there was an initial burst of
activity which then decreased to a steady rate of discharge above the
control level. After reversal of the displacement, afferent activity
was briefly inhibited but then returned to control levels.
|
|

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Example of afferent activity of a single fiber recorded during a step
change in negative upper airway pressure (NUAP).
Top: raw ENG activity from the fiber.
Middle: instantaneous firing frequency
of the fiber. Bottom: NUAP. Note that
this fiber was silent before negative pressure. In response to NUAP,
there was an initial burst of activity which then decreased to a steady
rate of discharge above the control value for the duration of the
negative pressure. In addition, note that gradual change in negative
pressure after removal of the pressure source was associated with a
progressive decrease in firing frequency.
|
|

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Mean firing frequency of 12 single fibers before (control) and during
tongue displacement (1-3 cm)
(left), and mean firing frequency of
8 single fibers before (control) and during NUAP of 10 to
30 cmH2O
(right). Values of firing frequency
were obtained during steady-state fiber discharge. Bars, SE.
* P < 0.01. Note increase in
afferent discharge in response to both displacement of the tongue and
NUAP.
|
|
Step changes in negative pressure applied to the upper airway led to an
immediate increase in ENG activity (Fig. 3). In addition, at the higher
NUAPs, there was an initial burst of activity which then decreased to a
steady rate of discharge above the control value for the duration of
the negative pressure. Of the 12 fibers that responded to PS, 8 responded to NUAP between
10 and
30 cmH2O, with firing frequency
increasing from 23 ± 9 to 41 ± 9 Hz (Fig. 4;
P < 0.001).
For two fibers tested at multiple pressure levels and degrees of tongue
displacement in the same cat, there was a positive linear relationship
between the increase in frequency of fiber discharge (above control)
and both the degree of tongue stretch (Fig. 5), and the
level of NUAP (Fig. 6).

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Plots of %increase in firing frequency (above control) as function of
tongue displacement for 2 fibers. Each point represents a single value.
Two displacement runs were performed. Linear regression lines and
correlation coefficients (R) are
shown. Note that in both fibers there was a positive linear
relationship between the increase in frequency of fiber discharge and
the degree of tongue displacement.
|
|

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Plots of %increase in firing frequency (above control) as function of
NUAP for same 2 fibers as in Fig. 5. Linear regression lines and
R values are shown. Each point
represents a single value. Two NUAP runs were performed. Note that in
both fibers there was a positive linear relationship between the
increase in frequency of fiber discharge and the level of NUAP.
|
|
In the two fibers tested after local anesthesia was administered, the
increase in firing frequency in response to
14
cmH2O NUAP was not altered by
topical anesthesia of the upper airway mucosa. In three to five trials
of NUAP, the increase in firing frequency of these two fibers did not
change: from 24.6 ± 0 and 13.0 ± 0.5 Hz before local
anesthesia, to 20.7 ± 3.0 and 15.4 ± 0.9 Hz after local
anesthesia, respectively (Fig. 7).

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Mean increase in firing frequency of 2 fibers during NUAP of 14
cmH2O before and after
appliciation of topical anesthesia to entire upper airway (UA) mucosa.
Bars, SD. Note that UA anesthesia did not alter the increase in
afferent discharge elicited by NUAP.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The principal findings of this study are that in anesthetized, supine,
tracheostomized cats afferent discharges from the hypoglossal nerve are
elicited by 1) mechanical
displacement of the tongue and 2)
NUAP. In addition, topical upper airway anesthesia does not abolish the
afferent discharges elicited by NUAP.
A number of upper airway muscles in both animals and humans are
recruited in response to NUAP within the upper airway lumen (10, 16,
22). The genioglossus and hypoglossal nerve efferent activity have been
extensively studied, and negative pressure recruitment of genioglossus
muscle activity is predominantly mediated via stimulation of
pressure-sensitive upper airway mucosal mechanoreceptors (11, 12, 15,
16). This is supported by studies in which topical anesthesia of the
upper airway mucosa can abolish or diminish the genioglossus response
to NUAP in both animals and humans (9, 15, 16). However, in animals,
sectioning the internal branches of the superior laryngeal nerve
markedly reduced but did not eliminate the response to NUAP. This
suggests that alternate afferent pathways are involved in this reflex
response. The glossopharyngeal and trigeminal nerves have been
suggested as possible afferent pathways for reflex recruitment of upper
airway muscles in response to NUAP (9, 11, 12, 14), because the
nerves are involved in detecting mucosal sensation in the
nose, nasopharynx, and oropharynx. In addition to mucosal
mechanoreceptors, there are several other possible upper airway
receptors. These include slowly and rapidly adapting receptors of the
upper airway, proprioceptive nerve endings of the tongue, laryngeal
muscle and joint receptors, and other muscle mechanoreceptors.
Critique of method.
There were a number of limitations to the methodology employed in the
current study. First, passive distension of a fiber and characteristics
of the receptive field of the fibers could not be tested. Second, the
degree of movement associated with application of the face mask and
negative pressure was such that it was not always possible to keep
recording from a single fiber by using a teased fiber preparation.
Consequently, data sets from individual fibers were frequently
incomplete. Third, the experimental setup was unable to measure the
degree of tongue displacement induced by negative pressure. Fourth, we
were unable to determine whether the afferent activity from the
hypoglossal nerve was derived from the intrinsic or extrinsic
musculature of the tongue. However, muscle spindles have been found in
both extrinsic and intrinsic tongue muscles (2, 5, 7). Moreover, either
anterior or posterior tongue stretching is likely to lengthen the
extrinsic (i.e., genioglossus) muscles because of the anatomic
direction of the fibers. In addition, both intrinsic and extrinsic
muscles are likely to be stretched or deformed by negative pressure due to the complex orientation of the fibers within the tongue, although this has not been tested. In support of this observation, Brennick et
al. (4) have recently demonstrated that NUAP does stretch the
genioglossus muscle. Last, it was unlikely that the afferent signals
recorded from the hypoglossal nerve were artifacts from the solenoid
valve. Both Figs. 2 and 3 show the typical initial bursts of activity
and gradual fall in firing frequency with the onset and cessation of
the pressure stimulus that are characteristic of muscle spindles.
The hypoglossal nerve in mammals and primates
is motorsensory to the extrinsic and intrinsic muscles of the tongue
and the geniohyoid muscle (8, 17). The extracranial hypoglossal nerve has a larger medial and a smaller lateral division. The medial division
gives an intermediate branch to the geniohyoid muscle, then splits into
numerous twigs to the genioglossus and other intrinsic muscles of the
tongue. The lateral division supplies the styloglossus and
hyoglossus. The hypoglossal nerve does not carry any
sensory information from the upper airway mucosal surfaces. Thus it is
clear from anatomic considerations that the afferent discharges
elicited from the hypoglossal nerve in our study did not arise from
mucosal or submucosal mechanoreceptors and must have arisen from
receptors within the tongue muscle. Moreover, in the fibers we studied,
topical upper airway anesthesia did not significantly alter the
increase in afferent discharge elicited by NUAP; this supports our
hypothesis that the afferent discharges from the hypoglossal nerve did
not arise from mechanoreceptors located in the muscosa or submucosa.
The precise nature of the tongue muscle mechanoreceptors stimulated by
NUAP in this study remains speculative. Early histological studies
failed to show the existence of neuromuscular spindles within the
intrinsic and extrinsic musculature of the cat's tongue (1, 3, 5).
Despite this, Cooper (6) recorded activity from single-fiber afferents
of the cat hypoglossal nerve in response to stretching of the tongue.
More recent studies, using sophisticated histological techniques, have
now identified muscle spindles in the tongue muscles of subprimate
animals (13, 18, 20). However, the prevalence of muscle spindles in the
tongue muscles varies between species. In contrast to subprimate
species, muscle spindles are relatively numerous in the intrinsic and
extrinsic muscles of the monkey tongue and the human tongue (2, 5, 7).
In the six cats we studied, only 12 afferent
fibers were selected on the basis of their sensitivity to PS of the
tongue. The paucity of afferent fibers detected is consistent with
previous studies that have directly identified muscle spindles in rat
tongues. Smith (20) identified between two and seven spindles in four rats studied, whereas O'Reilly and Fitzgerald (18) identified a total
of eight spindles in eight rat tongues. This contrasts with the
numerous muscle spindles identified in primate and human tongues (2, 5,
7). Our results together with numerous reports identifiying muscle
spindles in primate and subprimate mammals suggest that muscle spindles
are the proprioceptive nerve endings responsible for the hypoglossal
sensory discharge in the present study.
Several authors have recorded sensory discharges from the medial end
branch of the hypoglossal nerve of the cat (1, 6, 23) and monkey (2).
Our results are consistent with those of Zapata and Torrealba (23), who
provided a detailed and quantitative report of sensory discharges
recorded from fine filaments of the hypoglossal nerve in response to PS
of the cat's tongue. In both studies, the fibers responded with slow
adaptation to mechanical stimulation produced by passive tongue
displacements. In addition, most hypoglossal sensory units showed a
tonic rate of discharge during resting conditions, whereas some fibers
were silent at rest (Figs. 2 and 3). Our study has extended these
findings by demonstrating that most hypoglossal sensory fibers that
respond to passive displacement also respond to NUAP.
In the present study, we recorded from a number of hypoglossal nerve
afferents and found that the firing frequency increased in response to
NUAP (Fig. 6). As the upper airway pressure became more negative,
fibers showed an accelerated discharge at the onset of the stimulus and
a pause at the offset of the stimulus (Fig. 2). Furthermore, we
demonstrated that firing frequency was directly and linearly related to
the degree of NUAP stimulus (Fig. 6). These observations suggest that
the rate of sensory discharge signals not only the intensity of NUAP
but also the time course of application and removal of the stimulus. In
the fibers we studied, we found a positive linear relationship between
the firing frequency and both the amount of tongue displacement (Fig.
5) and the degree of NUAP (Fig. 6). Indeed, the similarity in response
patterns between passive tongue displacement and NUAP (in the same
fiber) suggests that the mechanism by which negative pressure
stimulates proprioceptive afferents is via stretching or deforming the
tongue. Recently, Brennick et al. (4) embedded sonomicrometers and electrodes in genioglossus muscle fibers and found that NUAP lengthened the genioglossus muscle. This supports our hypothesis that NUAP in our
study stretched or deformed the tongue muscle, hence activating proprioceptive afferents in the same manner as would tongue displacement.
It remains unclear whether afferent activity in the hypoglossal nerve
elicited by tongue stretch (or negative pressure) will cause reflex
activation of the genioglossus muscle. There are no data in the
literature to directly support this assumption. However, the responses
demonstrated in our study do provide an additional afferent mechanism
that may possibly lead to reflex activation of the tongue muscle in
response to negative pressure.
In conclusion, this is the first study to demonstrate that NUAP can
stimulate mechanoreceptors in the tongue muscles and that these
mechanoreceptors are not superficially located in the tongue mucosal
surface. Stretching of the tongue is the most likely mechanism by which
negative pressure activates hypoglossal afferent fibers. We speculate
that activation of muscle mechanoreceptors, such as tongue muscle
spindles, may provide an alternative mechanism for the reflex
activation of upper airway dilator muscles in response to NUAP and that
this mechanism operates independently of superficially located
(mucosal) pressure mechanoreceptors.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
This study was supported by the National Health and Medical
Research Council of Australia.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement"
in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement"
in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: A. Brancatisano,
Dept. of Respiratory Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Westmead NSW 2145, Australia.
Received 10 February 1998; accepted in final form 1 December 1998.
 |
REFERENCES |
1.
Blom, S. Afferent influences on tongue muscle activity. A
morphological and physiological study in the cat. Acta
Physiol. Scand. 49, Suppl. 1: 170: 1-97, 1960.
2.
Bowman, J. P.,
and
C. M. Combs.
Discharge patterns of lingual spindle afferent fibres in the hypoglossal nerve of the Rhesus monkey.
Exp. Neurol.
21:
105-119,
1968[Medline].
3.
Boyd, J. D.
Proprioceptive innervation of mammalian tongue.
J. Anat.
72:
146-148,
1937.
4.
Brennick, M. J.,
R. A. Parisi,
and
S. J. England.
Influence of preload and afterload on genioglossus muscle length in awake goats.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
155:
2010-2017,
1997[Abstract].
5.
Cooper, S.
Muscle spindles in the intrinsic muscle of the human tongue.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
122:
193-202,
1953.
6.
Cooper, S.
Afferent impulses in the hypoglossal nerve on stretching the cat's tongue.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
126:
32P,
1954.
7.
Fitzgerald, M. J. T.,
and
S. R. Sachithanandan.
The structure and source of lingual proprioceptors in the monkey.
J. Anat.
128:
523-552,
1979[Medline].
8.
Gray, H.
Gray's Anatomy (36th ed.), edited by L. P. Williams,
and R. Warwick. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1984.
9.
Horner, R. L.,
J. A. Innes,
H. B. Holden,
and
A. Guz.
Afferent pathway(s) for pharyngeal dilator reflex to negative pressure in man: a study using upper airway anaesthesia.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
436:
31-44,
1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10.
Horner, R. L.,
J. A. Innes,
K. Murphy,
and
A. Guz.
Evidence for reflex upper airway dilator muscle activation by sudden negative airway pressure in man.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
436:
15-29,
1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11.
Hwang, J.,
W. M. St. John,
and
D. Bartlett, Jr.
Afferent pathways for hypoglossal and phrenic responses to changes in upper airway pressure.
Respir. Physiol.
55:
341-354,
1984[Medline].
12.
Hwang, J.,
W. M. St. John,
and
D. Bartlett, Jr.
Receptors responding to changes in upper airway pressure.
Respir. Physiol.
55:
355-366,
1984[Medline].
13.
Maier, A.
Occurrence and distribution of muscle spindles in masticatory and suprahyoid muscles of the rat.
Am. J. Anat.
155:
483-506,
1979[Medline].
14.
Mathew, O. P.
Upper airway negative-pressure effects on respiratory activity of upper airway muscles.
J. Appl. Physiol.
56:
500-505,
1984[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15.
Mathew, O. P.,
Y. K. Abu-Osba,
and
B. T. Thach.
Genioglossus muscle responses to upper airway pressure changes: afferent pathways.
J. Appl. Physiol.
52:
445-450,
1982[Abstract/Free Full Text].
16.
Mathew, O. P.,
Y. K. Abu-Osba,
and
B. T. Thach.
Influence of upper airway pressure changes on genioglossus muscle respiratory activity.
J. Appl. Physiol.
52:
438-444,
1982[Abstract/Free Full Text].
17.
Miller, E. M.
Miller's Anatomy of the Dog, edited by J. C. Christenson,
and H. E. Evans. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1964.
18.
O'Reilly, P. M. R.,
and
M. J. T. Fitzgerald.
Fibre composition of the hypoglossal nerve in the rat.
J. Anat.
172:
227-243,
1990[Medline].
19.
Sant'Ambrogio, G.,
O. P. Mathew,
J. T. Fisher,
and
F. B. Sant'Ambrogio.
Laryngeal receptors responding to transmural pressure, airflow and local muscle activity.
Respir. Physiol.
54:
317-330,
1983[Medline].
20.
Smith, K. K.
Histological demonstration of muscle spindles in the tongue of the rat.
Arch. Oral Biol.
34:
529-534,
1989[Medline].
21.
Van der Touw, T.,
N. O'Neill,
A. Brancatisano,
T. Amis,
J. Wheatley,
and
L. A. Engel.
Respiratory-related activity of soft palate muscles: augmentation by negative upper airway pressure.
J. Appl. Physiol.
76:
424-432,
1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].
22.
Van Lunteren, E.,
W. B. Van de Graaff,
D. M. Parker,
J. Mitra,
M. A. Haxhiu,
K. P. Strohl,
and
N. S. Cherniak.
Nasal and laryngeal reflex responses to negative upper airway pressure.
J. Appl. Physiol.
56:
746-752,
1984[Abstract/Free Full Text].
23.
Zapata, P.,
and
G. Torrealba.
Mechanosensory units in the hypoglossal nerve of the cat.
Brain Res.
32:
349-367,
1971[Medline].
J APPL PHYSIOL 86(4):1396-1401
8570-7587/99 $5.00
Copyright © 1999 the American Physiological Society