|
|
||||||||
University Laboratory of Physiology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PT, United Kingdom
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Acclimatization to altitude involves an increase in the acute
hypoxic ventilatory response (AHVR). Because low-dose dopamine decreases AHVR and domperidone increases AHVR, the increase in AHVR at
altitude may be generated by a decrease in peripheral dopaminergic
activity. The AHVR of nine subjects was determined with and without a
prior period of 8 h of isocapnic hypoxia under each of three
pharmacological conditions: 1)
control, with no drug administered;
2) dopamine (3 µg · min
1 · kg
1);
and 3) domperidone (Motilin, 40 mg).
AHVR increased after hypoxia (P
0.001). Dopamine
decreased (P
0.01), and domperidone increased (P
0.005) AHVR. The effect of both drugs on AHVR appeared
larger after hypoxia, an observation supported by a significant
interaction between prior hypoxia and drug in the analysis of variance
(P
0.05). Although the increased
effect of domperidone after hypoxia of 0.40 l · min
1 · %saturation
1
[95% confidence interval (CI)
0.11 to 0.92 l · min
1 · %
1]
did not reach significance, the lower limit for this confidence interval suggests that little of the increase in AHVR after sustained hypoxia was brought about by a decrease in peripheral dopaminergic inhibition.
acute hypoxic ventilatory response; hypoxic sensitivity; acclimatization
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
VENTILATORY ACCLIMATIZATION to altitude involves a progressive rise in ventilation and a progressive fall in the arterial partial pressure of CO2. The processes underlying this phenomenon are incompletely understood. Part of the response involves an elevation in the acute hypoxic ventilatory response (AHVR) (10, 11, 22, 30), and there is evidence from animal work that this arises in the carotid body (CB) (5). However, the actual mechanism associated with this has not been fully elucidated.
In view of the abundance of dopamine in the CB (9), and the finding that exogenous administration of dopamine decreases the ventilatory response to hypoxia (2, 3, 8, 21, 26, 27, 29), one possibility is that the increase in AHVR during acclimatization to altitude is related to some reduction in dopaminergic activity. This has recently been investigated in cats by Tatsumi et al. (23). They compared the influence of dopaminergic blockade on hypoxic responses before and after acclimatization and found that peripheral dopaminergic blockade increased ventilatory and CB responses to hypoxia before, but not after, acclimatization. They concluded that the activity of inhibitory dopaminergic mechanisms within the CB is decreased after sustained hypoxic exposure and that this lessening of inhibition may contribute to the enhancement of AHVR in acclimatization to altitude.
The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether such a reduction in the activity of inhibitory dopaminergic mechanisms could also be detected in humans. The study compared the effects of dopaminergic blockade on AHVR with and without a prior period of sustained hypoxia. To determine whether there are any changes in the sensitivity to dopamine, the study also compared the inhibitory effects on AHVR of low-dose dopamine infusions with and without prior sustained hypoxia.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
Subjects. Eleven healthy adults, seven men and four women, were studied. Their average age was 23.4 ± 1.1 (SD) yr, average weight was 70.3 ± 2.9 kg, and average height was 177.2 ± 2.5 cm. All subjects received written and verbal descriptions of the experiment before they gave their consent. Subjects were naive as to the precise purpose of the study and the particular protocol employed on the day. The study was approved by the Central Oxford Research Ethics Committee.
Protocols. Each subject was studied both with and without an antecedent period of 8 h of isocapnic hypoxia under each of the following three pharmacological conditions: 1) control, with no drug administered; 2) dopamine; and 3) domperidone. This gave a total of six different protocols. These were undertaken on 6 different days in random order. Each protocol involving prolonged hypoxia was followed by a period of at least 1 wk in which no experiments were conducted on that subject; the remaining experiments were separated by at least 24 h. In each case, the purpose was to determine AHVR.
For protocols involving dopamine, an infusion of 3 µg · min
1 · kg
1
was started 15 min in advance of beginning the measurement of AHVR.
Before and during infusions, blood pressure was measured regularly with
a sphygmomanometer. For protocols involving domperidone, an oral dose
of 40 mg was given 1 h in advance of the measurement of AHVR. On days
involving prior exposure to hypoxia, the subjects' end-tidal
PO2
(PETO2) was held at 55 Torr
for 8 h and the subjects' end-tidal
PCO2
(PETCO2) was held at their
natural prehypoxic value. A period of 30 min of breathing room air was
allowed before the determination of AHVR. Thus, for the posthypoxic
studies, dopamine infusions were always started after the 8-h exposure
to hypoxia, but the administration of domperidone was undertaken 30 min
before the end of the 8-h period.
Measurements of AHVR were undertaken with
PETCO2 held constant
throughout at 1-2 Torr above subjects' normal level. PETO2 was held at 100 Torr
for the first 5 min and then varied in a set of six square waves, each
of a period of 120 s, alternating between 50 and 100 Torr.
Hypoxic exposures. The sustained hypoxic exposures were obtained by varying the gas composition in a purpose-built chamber. In the chamber, subjects were free to move around if they desired. Most spent their time sitting comfortably watching television or reading. Respired gas was sampled via a nasal catheter and analyzed by mass spectrometry. The PCO2 and PO2 signals were sampled by computer, and the end-tidal values were determined breath by breath. These values were used in a feedback algorithm to adjust the chamber composition every 5 min to force the end-tidal values of the subject toward the desired levels. A pulse oximeter was used to monitor the arterial saturation in the subject, and there was a separate oxygen monitor with an alarm inside the chamber (for a full description of chamber and gas-controlling system, see Ref. 13).
Measurement of AHVR. Measurements of AHVR were made outside the chamber by using an end-tidal forcing system. This system required subjects to breathe through a mouthpiece with the nose occluded. The mouthpiece was connected in series with a turbine volume-measuring device (15) and a pneumotachograph to measure respiratory volumes and flows. Gas was continuously sampled at the mouth and analyzed for PO2 and PCO2 by mass spectrometry. All experimental data were recorded in real time at a sampling frequency of 50 Hz by a computer that also determined PETO2 and PETCO2 together with the inspiratory and expiratory volumes and durations. The end-tidal gas values were then passed, breath by breath, to a second computer, which controlled a fast-responding gas-mixing system. The computer controlling the gas-mixing system compared the actual end-tidal values with the desired values, and, to obtain the desired end-tidal profile, made appropriate adjustments to the inspired gas on a breath-by-breath basis. A pulse oximeter was attached to a finger to monitor oxygen saturation, and electrodes were placed on the chest to obtain the electrocardiogram. The details of the forcing procedure and the gas-mixing system are described in greater detail elsewhere (14, 20).
Data analysis.
The breath-by-breath data sequence used to assess AHVR was 14 min in
length. It was composed of the 2-min period immediately before the
square-wave hypoxic stimulation began, together with the data from the
6 repeats of the 120-s hypoxic square wave (each repeat consisted of
60 s at PETO2 = 50 Torr and 60 s at PETO2 = 100 Torr). The number of breaths in this data sequence varied between 131 and 385. To obtain numerical values for AHVR, a model of the
respiratory response to hypoxia was fitted to each of the individual
data sequences. The model used was model 3 as described by Clement and Robbins (6). This
single-compartment model has four parameters: hypoxic sensitivity, Gp
(l/min); residual ventilation in the absence of hypoxia,
c (l/min); a pure delay for the lag between the
hypoxic stimulus at the lung and the ventilatory response,
T (s); and a time constant,
(s).
These parameters were estimated by nonlinear regression [for full
details, see Clement and Robbins (6)]. The values for Gp from the
model were taken as the estimates of AHVR.
0.05 was taken
as statistically significant.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
None of the subjects had any side effects from the dopamine infusion or from the administration of domperidone. Blood pressure did not change substantially in any subject during the administration of dopamine.
Quality of gas control in the chamber. The quality of the gas control obtained in the chamber is illustrated in Fig. 1. PETCO2 and PETO2, averaged on a 5-min basis, are shown individually for each of the three exposures in each subject. PETO2 was maintained constant at close to 55 Torr in all exposures. PETCO2 was kept almost constant throughout the 8 h at the individual prehypoxic control values.
|
Quality of gas control during measurement of AHVR. An example of one experiment to determine AHVR is shown in Fig. 2. PETCO2 was reasonably constant throughout. PETO2 was lowered and raised abruptly at the onset and relief of hypoxia, with some overshoot at the relief of hypoxia. These findings were typical of all determinations of AHVR.
|
Ventilatory responses. Figure 3 shows an example of one set of results for each protocol from one subject (subject 1015). This subject demonstrated repeatable responses to the successive square waves of hypoxia for all protocols except for the posthypoxic dopamine experiment. All other subjects generally demonstrated repeatable responses to the hypoxic square waves, although, as for subject 1015, there were sets of data for which the hypoxic responses were less steady. Also shown in the figure is the fit of the model to the data. In general this describes the data well.
|
0.005), presence or absence of
hypoxia (P
0.001), and for the
interactive term between these two factors (P
0.05). Post hoc analysis
revealed both a significant decrease in Gp of 0.40 l · min
1 · %
1
(95% CI 0.12-0.69
l · min
1 · %
1,
P
0.01) with dopamine and a
significant increase in Gp of 0.45 l · min
1 · %
1
(95% CI 0.17-0.73
l · min
1 · %
1,
P
0.005) with
domperidone. The mean increase in Gp after hypoxic exposure was 0.62 l · min
1 · %
1
(95% CI 0.41-0.83
l · min
1 · %
1).
Although the significant interactive term indicates that the effects of
drug and prior exposure to hypoxia were not simply additive, after
hypoxic exposure neither the increased effect of dopamine on Gp
[0.18
l · min
1 · %
1,
95% CI
0.34 to 0.69 l · min
1 · %
1,
P = not significant (NS)] nor
the increased effect of domperidone on Gp (0.40 l · min
1 · %
1,
95% CI
0.11 to 0.92 l · min
1 · %
1,
P = NS) reached significance (although
the difference in Gp between domperidone and dopamine did widen
significantly by 0.56 l · min
1 · %
1,
95% CI 0.06-1.06
l · min
1 · %
1,
P
0.05).
|
|
c from the
modeling process, and Fig. 5 shows the
changes in the mean values for this parameter.
c
appears to have increased after the 8-h hypoxic exposure. Dopamine
appears to have depressed the value of
c, whereas
domperidone appears to have had little effect on the value of
c. ANOVA on
c revealed that there
was a significant effect of drug as the fixed factor
(P
0.05), that the increase in
c after hypoxic exposure was significant
(P
0.001), and that the interactive
term between these two fixed factors (drug and presence or absence of
hypoxia) was nonsignificant. Post hoc analysis revealed that the
decrease in
c with dopamine of 4.72 l/min (95% CI
1.37-8.07 l/min, P
0.01) was
significant, whereas the small increase in
c with
domperidone of 0.56 l/min (95% CI
2.79 to 3.92 l/min, P = NS) was not. The mean increase in
c after hypoxic exposure was 6.33 l/min (95% CI
3.88-8.77 l/min).
|
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
This study found no evidence that a reduction in dopaminergic
inhibition underlay the increase in AHVR that was observed after sustained hypoxic exposure. Rather, it appeared that the effects of
both dopamine infusion and domperidone administration increased in
proportion to the overall increase in AHVR after hypoxic exposure, an
observation supported by a significant interactive term between prior
hypoxia and drug in the ANOVA. Although the 95% CI for the increase in
effect of domperidone after hypoxic exposure of
0.11 to 0.92 l · min
1 · %
1
includes zero, and it is therefore impossible to exclude some reduction
in the effect of domperidone after hypoxic exposure, the lower limit of
the CI is small compared with the rise in AHVR after hypoxic exposure
of 0.62 l · min
1 · %
1
(95% CI 0.41-0.83
l · min
1 · %
1).
This result suggests that little of the increase in AHVR after sustained hypoxia could have been brought about by a decrease in
peripheral dopaminergic inhibition. This finding is in contrast to the
findings of Tatsumi et al. (23) in cats, in which a marked reduction in
the effect of domperidone on AHVR was detected.
A second subsidiary finding was that low-dose dopamine, but not domperidone, altered (reduced) the estimated level of ventilation in hyperoxia obtained as part of the model-fitting process.
Experimental issues relating to the present study.
The technique used in the present study to assess AHVR was to switch
PETO2 repeatedly between 50 and 100 Torr in a series of square waves with a period of 2 min. This
technique has the theoretical advantage over an incremental exposure to hypoxia that the results should be relatively unaffected by a varying
baseline ventilation. It was also associated with a relatively low
total exposure to hypoxia that should have helped to minimize the
degree of hypoxic ventilatory decline that developed over the period of
the measurement. The mean control value for AHVR of 0.72 ± 0.07 (SE)
l · min
1 · %
1
compares favorably with a value of 0.74 l · min
1 · %
1
for 97 subjects from a recent study (24) with (an admittedly imperfect)
protocol using incremental hypoxia. The value also compares well with a
resting value of 180 for parameter "A" in the equation of Weil et
al. (28), which was obtained by using a protocol involving incremental
hypoxia (this equates to a sensitivity of ~0.66
l · min
1 · %
1).
However, the value compares less well with the mean "
V40" of
19.4 liters/ (min × m2)
of Kronenberg et al. (17), obtained by using incremental hypoxia, which
equates to a sensitivity of ~1.45
l · min
1 · %
1.
1 · min
1
infusion of dopamine on the ventilatory sensitivity to hypoxia was
completely abolished after intravenous administration of 10 mg of
domperidone. Taking into account that the bioavailability of orally
administered domperidone is low at ~15% (4), the dose employed in
the present study may be equivalent to only 60% of the dose employed
by Ward. Despite the fact that the dose in the present study was lower,
the difference is very small in relation to overall range of
concentrations in a typical dose-response relationship, which may span
several orders of magnitude. Thus the blockade is likely to be near to
complete. This conclusion is also supported by work in anesthetized
animals, where an intravenous dose of domperidone as low as 1 µg/kg
(~1% of that employed in the present study) shifted the
dose-response curve for dopamine-induced chemosensory inhibition to the
right, and a dose of 45 µg/kg (equivalent to ~53% of that employed
in the present study) completely abolished the chemosensory inhibition
at all levels of dopamine administration (31).
Comparisons with other studies. As noted above, the results from the study by Tatsumi et al. (23) appear dissimilar from ours. This arises presumably from either a difference in methods between the studies or a species difference.
In relation to the method of study, Tatsumi et al. (23) acclimatized their cats for 2 days at a barometric pressure of 460 Torr (equivalent to a simulated altitude of 14,000 ft). This was a substantially longer period of exposure to hypoxia than was employed in the present study; moreover, the exposure to hypoxia was hypocapnic as opposed to the isocapnia that was maintained in the present study. A second point relates to the technique for determining AHVR. The study by Tatsumi et al. (23) used progressive isocapnic hypoxia to determine AHVR, whereas the present study used square-wave hypoxia under isocapnic conditions. Of perhaps more significance, however, is the fact that the measurements of AHVR by Tatsumi et al. were undertaken at different levels of PETCO2 for the different conditions of pre- and posthypoxic exposure, with and without domperidone. In particular, when studying the effect of domperidone on AHVR, Tatsumi et al. maintained PETCO2 at the level equal to the domperidone-induced hypocapnia that they observed under euoxic conditions. That is, PETCO2 was held lower for the measurements of AHVR with domperidone than without domperidone. This difference in CO2 stimulus could have masked the presence of an actual increase in AHVR with domperidone after hypoxic exposure. In the present study the same levels of PETCO2 were used for all determinations of AHVR. A third issue relates to the dose of domperidone employed. In the study by Tatsumi et al. (23), a dose of 700 µg/kg was employed. In the present study, a single oral dose of 40 mg was given that is approximately equivalent to 570 ± 130 (SD) µg/kg. More important, however, is the fact that Tatsumi et al. gave their dose intra-arterially, whereas it the present study it was given orally. Because the bioavailabilty of domperidone when given orally is ~15% (4), this suggests that the dose employed by Tatsumi et al. would have been around a factor of 10 greater than that used in the present study. After the experimental work for the present study had been undertaken, another study of the effects of domperidone post-hypoxic exposure became available (16). In this study, Janssen et al. also hypothesized that the increase in ventilation seen in acclimatization could result from a progressive downregulation of the inhibitory action of dopamine in the carotid bodies. They compared the effect of domperidone on AHVR in conscious goats with and without an antecedent period of 4 h of isocapnic hypoxia. Domperidone augmented AHVR not only without but also with antecedent hypoxia, failing to support the hypothesis. They concluded that the inhibitory dopaminergic mechanisms in the CB were not significantly reduced by prolonged hypoxia and that downregulation of CB dopaminergic mechanisms may not play a role in ventilatory acclimatization to hypoxia in goats. Thus their results support the results of the present study, that dopaminergic inhibitory mechanisms are functional after prolonged hypoxia. As in the present study, the duration of exposure to hypoxia in the study of Janssen et al. (16) was on the order of hours, rather than days. Similarly, Janssen et al. employed a constant PETCO2 for the assessment of the effects of domperidone. However, the dose of domperidone employed by Janssen et al. was 1,000 µg/kg intravenously, i.e., some 10-15 times greater than in the present study once bioavailability has been taken into account.Dopamine in the CB. The physiology of dopamine at the CB is complex and has recently been reviewed by Gonzalez et al. (12). In this review, Gonzalez et al. propose a model where, in response to hypoxia, dopamine is released locally by the type 1 cell at the site of the synapse with the carotid sinus nerve (CSN) ending. Dopamine then acts as an excitatory neurotransmitter at low-affinity receptors on the CSN ending. In addition to these dopamine receptors, there are also high-affinity dopamine autoreceptors on the type 1 cell, which are inhibitory and modulate the release of dopamine by the type 1 cell. With this model, low doses of dopamine inhibit neural activity through the high-affinity autoreceptors, whereas high doses of dopamine stimulate the CSN directly through the low-affinity receptors. Similarly, low doses of dopamine antagonists will enhance transmitter release through their effects on the high-affinity autoreceptors, whereas high doses of antagonists will inhibit the CSN discharge directly through the low-affinity receptors.
With respect to this model, the doses of dopamine and domperidone used in the present study would be expected to exert an effect at the high-affinity autoreceptors of the type 1 cell but not at the low-affinity receptors of the CSN nerve ending. Thus, in the present study, the increase in the absolute effects of the drugs on AHVR after 8 h of hypoxia is consistent with the overall increase in sensitivity of the type 1 cell of the CB to hypoxia. However, the fact that the relative effects of low-dose dopamine and domperidone have not altered provides no support for a role for the high-affinity autoreceptors in generating the increased sensitivity to hypoxia. Overall, it remains difficult to reconcile our results and those of Janssen et al. (16) with those of Tatsumi et al. (23) in a simple manner within the framework provided by the model of Gonzalez et al. (12). Consequently, it seems more likely that the differences arise through some of the methodological considerations or other factors raised under Comparisons with other studies.Effect of dopamine on
c.
The finding that dopamine depressed
c, whereas
domperidone did not affect
c, is intriguing. The
value for
c is a hypothetical value for ventilation
in the total absence of any hypoxic stimulation and thus needs to be
treated with the caution that such hypothetical values deserve.
Nevertheless, it is worth considering how this might be interpreted in
terms of the model of Gonzalez et al. (12) for the actions of dopamine
at the CB. The observation of a reduction in
c with low-dose dopamine implies that there is some residual transmitter release from the CB that stimulates the
CSN in the absence of hypoxia. However, the absence of any effect of
domperidone on
c suggests that, without hypoxia, the level of local release of dopamine at the synapse of the type 1 cell
with the CSN is inadequate to provide any endogenous stimulation of the
more remote autoreceptors on the type 1 cell.
Summary. Our results in humans do not support the idea that the increased ventilation after prolonged hypoxia is primarily related to a reduction in dopaminergic inhibition at the CB, as has been suggested by Tatsumi et al. (23) from experimental work in cats.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank D. F. O'Connor for very skilled and patient technical assistance.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This study was supported by the Wellcome Trust. M. E. F. Pedersen holds a Medical Research Council studentship and a scholarship from the Danish Research Academy.
Address for reprint requests: P. A. Robbins, Univ. Laboratory of Physiology, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PT, UK (E-mail: peter.robbins{at}physiol.ox.ac.uk).
Received 19 September 1997; accepted in final form 16 September 1998.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Armitage, P.,
and
G. Berry.
Statistical Methods in Medical Research (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific, 1987.
2.
Bainbridge, C. W.,
and
D. D. Heistad.
Effect of haloperidol on ventilatory responses to hypoxia in man.
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
213:
13-17,
1980
3.
Bascom, D. A.,
I. D. Clement,
K. L. Dorrington,
and
P. A. Robbins.
Effects of dopamine and domperidone on ventilation during isocapnic hypoxia in humans.
Respir. Physiol.
85:
319-328,
1991[Medline].
4.
Brogden, R. N.,
A. A. Carmine,
R. C. Heel,
T. M. Speight,
and
G. S. Avery.
Domperidone.
Drugs
24:
360-400,
1982[Medline].
5.
Busch, M. A.,
G. E. Bisgard,
and
H. V. Forster.
Ventilatory acclimatization to hypoxia is not dependent on arterial hypoxemia.
J. Appl. Physiol.
58:
1874-1880,
1985
6.
Clement, I. D.,
and
P. A. Robbins.
Dynamics of the ventilatory response to hypoxia in humans.
Respir. Physiol.
92:
253-275,
1993[Medline].
7.
Dahan, A.,
J. DeGoede,
A. Berkenbosch,
and
I. C. W. Olievier.
The influence of oxygen on the ventilatory response to carbon dioxide in man.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
428:
485-499,
1990
8.
Dahan, A.,
D. Ward,
M. van den Elsen,
J. Temp,
and
A. Berkenbosch.
Influence of reduced carotid body drive during sustained hypoxia on hypoxic depression of ventilation in humans.
J. Appl. Physiol.
81:
565-572,
1996
9.
Fidone, S. J.,
and
C. Gonzalez.
Initiation and control of chemoreceptor activity in the carotid body.
In: Handbook of Physiology. The Respiratory System. Control of Breathing. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1986, sect. 3, vol. II, pt. 1, chapt. 9, p. 247-312.
10.
Forster, H. V.,
J. A. Dempsey,
M. L. Birnbaum,
W. G. Reddan,
J. Thoden,
R. F. Grover,
and
J. Rankin.
Effect of chronic exposure to hypoxia on ventilatory response to CO2 and hypoxia.
J. Appl. Physiol.
31:
586-592,
1971
11.
Goldberg, S. V.,
R. B. Schoene,
D. Haynor,
B. Trimble,
E. R. Swenson,
J. B. Morrison,
and
E. J. Banister.
Brain tissue pH and ventilatory acclimatization to high altitude.
J. Appl. Physiol.
72:
58-63,
1992
12.
Gonzalez, C.,
L. Almarez,
A. Obeso,
and
R. Rigual.
Carotid body chemoreceptors: from natural stimuli to sensory discharges.
Physiol. Rev.
4:
829-898,
1994.
13.
Howard, L. S. G. E.,
R. A. Barson,
B. P. A. Howse,
T. R. McGill,
M. E. McIntyre,
D. F. O'Connor,
and
P. A. Robbins.
A chamber for controlling the end-tidal gas tensions over sustained periods in humans.
J. Appl. Physiol.
78:
1088-1091,
1995
14.
Howson, M. G.,
S. Khamnei,
M. E. McIntyre,
D. F. O'Connor,
and
P. A. Robbins.
A rapid computer-controlled binary gas-mixing system for studies in respiratory control (Abstract).
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
394:
7P,
1987.
15.
Howson, M. G.,
S. Khamnei,
D. F. O'Connor,
and
P. A. Robbins.
The properties of a turbine device for measuring respiratory volumes in man (Abstract).
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
382:
12P,
1986.
16.
Janssen, P.,
K. O'Halloran,
J. Pizarro,
M. Dwinell,
and
G. E. Bisgard.
Carotid body dopaminergic mechanisms are functional after acclimatization to hypoxia in goats.
Respir. Physiol.
111:
23-32,
1998.
17.
Kronenberg, R.,
F. N. Hamilton,
R. Gabel,
R. Hickey,
D. J. C. Read,
and
J. Severinghaus.
Comparison of three methods for quantitating respiratory response to hypoxia in man.
Respir. Physiol.
16:
109-125,
1972[Medline].
18.
Lahiri, S.,
and
R. G. DeLaney.
Stimulus interaction in the responses of carotid body chemoreceptor single afferent fibers.
Respir. Physiol.
24:
249-266,
1975[Medline].
19.
Miller, J. P.,
D. J. C. Cunningham,
B. B. Lloyd,
and
J. M. Young.
The transient respiratory effects in man of sudden changes in alveolar CO2 in hypoxia and in high oxygen.
Respir. Physiol.
20:
17-31,
1974[Medline].
20.
Robbins, P. A.,
G. D. Swanson,
and
M. G. Howson.
A prediction-correction scheme for forcing alveolar gases along certain time courses.
J. Appl. Physiol.
52:
1353-1357,
1982
21.
Sabol, S. J.,
and
D. S. Ward.
Effect of dopamine on hypoxic-hypercapnic interaction in humans.
Anesth. Analg.
66:
619-624,
1987
22.
Sato, M.,
J. W. Severinghaus,
F. L. Powell,
F.-D. Xu,
and
M. J. Spellman, Jr.
Augmented hypoxic ventilatory response in men at altitude.
J. Appl. Physiol.
73:
101-107,
1992
23.
Tatsumi, K.,
C. K. Pickett,
and
J. V. Weil.
Decreased carotid body hypoxic sensitivity in chronic hypoxia: role of dopamine.
Respir. Physiol.
101:
47-57,
1995[Medline].
24.
Vargas, M.,
F. Leon-Velarde,
C. C. Monge,
J. A. Palacios,
and
P. A. Robbins.
Similar hypoxic ventilatory responses in sea-level natives and high-altitude Andean natives living at sea level.
J. Appl. Physiol.
84:
1024-1029,
1998
25.
Ward, D. S.
The role of the peripheral D-2 dopamine receptors in hypoxic ventilatory response.
In: Concepts and Formalizations in the Control of Breathing, edited by G. Benchitrit,
P. Baconnier,
and J. Demongeot. Manchester, UK: Manchester Univ. Press, 1987, p. 157-163.
26.
Ward, D. S.,
and
J. W. Bellville.
Reduction of hypoxic ventilatory drive by dopamine.
Anesth. Analg.
61:
333-337,
1982
27.
Ward, D. S.,
and
M. Nino.
The effects of dopamine on the ventilatory response to sustained hypoxia in humans.
In: Control of Breathing and Its Modelling Perspective, edited by Y. Honda,
Y. Miyamoto,
K. Konno,
and J. D. Widdicombe. New York: Plenum, 1992, p. 291-298.
28.
Weil, J. V.,
E. Byrne-Quinn,
I. D. Sodal,
W. O. Friesen,
B. Underhill,
G. F. Filley,
and
R. R. Grover.
Hypoxic ventilatory drive in normal man.
J. Clin. Invest.
49:
1061-1072,
1970.
29.
Welsh, M. J.,
D. D. Heistad,
and
F. M. Abboud.
Effect of dopamine on ventilation in man.
J. Clin. Invest.
61:
708-713,
1978.
30.
White, D. P.,
K. Gleeson,
C. K. Pickett,
A. M. Rannels,
A. Cymerman,
and
J. V. Weil.
Altitude acclimatization: influence on periodic breathing and chemoresponsiveness during sleep.
J. Appl. Physiol.
63:
401-412,
1987
31.
Zapata, P.,
and
F. Torrealba.
Blockade of dopamine induced chemosensory inhibition by domperidone.
Neurosci. Lett.
51:
356-364,
1984.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. G. Vincent, A. E. Waddell, M. G. Caron, J. K. L. Walker, and J. T. Fisher A murine model of hyperdopaminergic state displays altered respiratory control FASEB J, May 1, 2007; 21(7): 1463 - 1471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Fatemian, D. J F Nieuwenhuijs, L. J Teppema, S. Meinesz, A. G L van der Mey, A. Dahan, and P. A Robbins The respiratory response to carbon dioxide in humans with unilateral and bilateral resections of the carotid bodies J. Physiol., June 15, 2003; 549(3): 965 - 973. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. A. Alea, M. A. Czapla, J. A. Lasky, N. Simakajornboon, E. Gozal, and D. Gozal PDGF-beta receptor expression and ventilatory acclimatization to hypoxia in the rat Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2000; 279(5): R1625 - R1633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Ren, K. L. Dorrington, P. H. Maxwell, and P. A. Robbins Effects of desferrioxamine on serum erythropoietin and ventilatory sensitivity to hypoxia in humans J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2000; 89(2): 680 - 686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. F. Pedersen, P. Robach, J.-P. Richalet, and P. A. Robbins Peripheral chemoreflex function in hyperoxia following ventilatory acclimatization to altitude J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2000; 89(1): 291 - 296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Zhang and P. A. Robbins Methodological and physiological variability within the ventilatory response to hypoxia in humans J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2000; 88(5): 1924 - 1932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |