Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 85: 465-470, 1998;
8750-7587/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berg, A.
Right arrow Articles by Heyeraas, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berg, A.
Right arrow Articles by Heyeraas, K. J.
Vol. 85, Issue 2, 465-470, August 1998

Micropuncture measurements of interstitial fluid pressure in rat nasal mucosa during early inflammatory reactions

Ansgar Berg, Arne Kirkebø, and Karin J. Heyeraas

Department of Physiology, University of Bergen, N-5009 Bergen, Norway

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Interstitial fluid pressure (Pif) has been studied in rat nasal mucosa during early inflammatory reactions induced by dextran anaphylaxis and local application of histamine. Pif was measured by using sharpened micropipettes connected to a servo-controlled counterpressure system. Access to the nasal mucosa was obtained from the facial side of the head through a small cavity drilled in the nasal bone. During dextran anaphylaxis, Pif increased significantly from control values of 2.2 ± 0.4 to 3.8 ± 0.21 mmHg (P < 0.05) within 1 h. Corresponding Pif values for histamine were 1.6 ± 0.9 and 2.9 ± 0.9 mmHg (P < 0.05), respectively. These measurements support the hypothesis that a major driving force for the rapid exudation across inflamed respiratory mucosa is a hydrostatic pressure gradient created by increased mucosa Pif. When the transvascular fluid shifts accompanying the inflammatory reactions are prevented by circulatory arrest, Pif decreased significantly to subatmospheric values, -0.8 ± 0.8 and -3.3 ± 1.2 mmHg in the dextran and histamine group, respectively (P < 0.05). The decrease in Pif in the nasal mucosa after inflammatory stimuli, during circulatory arrest, provides further evidence for "active" modulation of Pif through changes in mechanical properties of the interstitial matrix. The decrease in Pif seen under these circumstances reveals a possible mechanism participating in the rapid and initial edema formation after inflammatory provocations.

circulation; histamine; dextran; inflammation

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

AT REST, MOST OF THE INSPIRED air passes into the lungs through the nose. Several nonspecific stimuli in the inhaled air may activate mediators from nasal mucosal cells, nerves, and blood vessels, causing inflammatory reactions. The pathophysiological changes in the mucosa during an acute inflammatory reaction consist essentially of vascular alterations (17). These vascular reactions include reduced tone of the capacitance vessels, e.g., venous sinusoids, and resistance vessels, as well as enhanced transvascular fluid flux with rapidly increasing interstitial fluid volume (IFV) and exudation of fluid to the mucosal surface (18). The fluid required to form tissue edema and luminal transudate must be derived from plasma and transported across the microvascular barrier. This transcapillary fluid transport is the product of the capillary filtration coefficient and the hydrostatic and colloid osmotic pressures acting across the capillary wall. These parameters are interrelated in the "Starling equation"
<IT>J</IT><SUB>v</SUB> = CFC × [P<SUB>c</SUB> − P<SUB>if</SUB> − &sfgr; (COP<SUB>c</SUB> − COP<SUB>if</SUB> )] (1)
<IT>J</IT><SUB>v</SUB> = CFC × &Dgr;P (2)
where Jv is transcapillary fluid transport; CFC is the capillary filtration coefficient; c and if denote capillary and interstitial fluid, respectively; sigma  is the capillary reflection coefficient for proteins; P and COP are the hydrostatic and colloid osmotic pressures, respectively; and Delta P is the net filtration pressure across the capillary wall. Equation 2 shows that increased fluid flux across the capillary can be obtained by increasing the capillary filtration coefficient or net filtration pressure across the capillary wall. It is commonly accepted that increased microvascular permeability and capillary pressure are the major pathophysiological vascular events during the development of an inflammatory edema (11). Furthermore, interstitial fluid pressure (Pif) is normally considered to counteract edema formation because increased IFV will raise Pif, in turn acting as a counterpressure against further capillary filtration (1). Contrary to this accepted role for Pif, it has been observed that Pif initially decreases concomitantly with edema formation during several acute inflammatory reactions (10, 14, 21). The greater subatmospheric Pif under these circumstances is regarded as an important driving force for the initial and rapid edema formation, concomitant with increased vascular permeability. The mechanism responsible for this negative pressure seems to involve structural components of the connective tissue (23), and it has been suggested that the tissue becomes an "active" participant in transcapillary fluid exchange during the immediate part of the inflammatory reaction, thereby actively "sucking" fluid out of the vasculature (23).

The present study was performed as a first attempt to investigate the effect of acute inflammation on Pif, intravascular pressure in the venous sinusoids (Ps), and blood flow [laser-Doppler flow (LDF)] in rat nasal mucosa. We have earlier developed an experimental model for rat nasal mucosa, which allows simultaneous measurements of several vascular parameters (12). We have previously measured a nasal mucosa Pif to be ~2 mmHg (12). To our knowledge, no measurements of Pif have been carried out in the upper airways during inflammatory conditions. It has been hypothesized that in the lower airways, plasma exudation produces an increased Pif (4) and that this pressure might separate the tissue cells, allowing exuded plasma to flow between the cells and into the airway lumen. An inflammatory reaction was attained by using dextran as an inflammatory mediator because it induced an anaphylactoid reaction in rats. Dextran anaphylaxis is associated with an increased negativity of Pif in the trachea (9) and skin (21), most likely associated with degranulation of mast cells (8). Histamine was subsequently used because it is the major component of the mast cell granules and has earlier been associated with increased negativity of Pif in skin (21). The edema formation will raise Pif and correspondingly attenuate a decrease in Pif. Measurements were therefore also performed after circulatory arrest, when there would be practically no transcapillary fluid flux in response to the inflammatory agent. The pressures were measured by micropuncture technique (27), and local blood flow was measured by LDF.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The experiments were performed in female Sprague-Dawley rats, weighing 200-250 g and anesthetized by intraperitoneal injections of pentobarbital sodium (Mebumal, 50 mg/ml body wt). The right femoral vein and artery were cannulated for supplemental administration of anesthetics and for blood pressure measurements, respectively. The arterial pressure was continuously recorded with a pressure transducer (model 1280, Hewlett-Packard Medical Instruments Group, Andover, MA) connected to a multichannel recorder (Gold RS3400, Ballainviers, France). The animals were breathing spontaneously and were kept in a supine position on a servo-controlled heating pad during the experiments. To eliminate movements, the head of the animal was fixed to the operating table by a stereotaxic frame with ear bars. The superior thyroid artery, a branch of the external carotid artery, was cannulated in a retrograde direction for local intra-arterial administration of drugs. Circulatory arrest was induced as part of the experimental protocol by intravenous injection of saturated potassium chloride under pentobarbital sodium anesthesia. Dextran and histamine might enhance capillary filtration, raising IFV. Thus Pif will become more positive because of fluid accumulation in the tissue and as a consequence of tissue compliance (1). Circulatory arrest was therefore induced 1 min after dextran infusion to allow distribution of dextran to the tissues, while edema formation was kept at a minimum. Otherwise, the animals were killed with saturated potassium chloride at the end of the experiments. In all experiments vascular parameters were measured simultaneously after drug challenge. The value of each studied parameter was calculated against the baseline value 1 min before the provocation.

The procedures described in this report were carried out with the approval of and in the accordance with the recommendations laid down by the Norwegian State Commission for Laboratory Animals.

Exposure of Nasal Mucosa

Access to the nasal mucosa was obtained surgically from the facial side of the head. A short skin incision was made midway between the eyes and the soft part of the nose tip (12). With the guidance of a stereomicroscope (Wild M10, Heerbrugg, Switzerland), a cavity was drilled in the right nasal bone toward the underlying nasal mucosa in the superior part of the nasal cavity. Illumination was provided by a fiber-optic lamp (KL 150B, Schott, Germany). The cavity was flushed continuously with saline (35°C) and deepened until the vessels of the nasal mucosa were visible through a thin (15-20 µm) layer of periost. The exposed part of the nasal mucosa had a diameter of 500-700 µm and was covered with saline. Through this cavity the micropipette was manipulated through intact periost and into the underlying nasal mucosa for measurements of Ps and Pif. Measurements were started as soon as possible, maximally 10 min after exposure.

Measurements

Ps and Pif measurements by micropuncture technique. Pressure measurements were made by sharpened glass pipettes (tip diameter 2-4 µm) that were filled with 0.5 M NaCl colored with Evans blue and were connected to a servo-controlled counterpressure device first described by Wiederhielm et al. (27). Under guidance of a stereomicroscope, Ps (diameter 15-300 µm) and Pif could be measured after direct puncture by using a micromanipulator (Leitz, Germany). The position of the pipette tip in the vessel was verified by injection of 0.5 M NaCl solution colored with Evans blue. When the pipette tip was placed intravascularly, the dye disappeared within seconds after cessation of injection, whereas the dye persisted in the tissue for ~5-10 min after interstitial deposition. The micropipette could be inserted into the vessels and interstitium without visible distortion of the tissue and did not impede blood flow, as judged by visual inspection of red blood cell velocity.

The following criteria were to be fulfilled before the measurements were accepted: 1) the recorded pressure was constant on change in feedback gain; 2) after fulfillment of criterion 1, free fluid communication between the pipette and interstitium was verified by applying suction to the pump, which resulted in increased resistance in the pipette because of movement of fluid with low tonicity into the pipette; and 3) zero-pressure recording was unchanged before and after the measurements.

Usually, the first Pif measurement could be made within 5 min after inflammatory drug challenge. Pif or Ps did not change after topical or intravascular infusion of saline in volumes equal to volumes in the experimental protocol. Measurements were grouped in the following time periods: 0-10, 11-20, 21-30, 31-40, 41-50, and 51-60 min after drug administration.

Local blood flow measurements. The red blood cell flux in the nasal mucosa was estimated by a laser flow probe connected to a Periflux PF2 (12-kHz) laser-Doppler flowmeter (Perimed, Stockholm, Sweden). The probe tip was covered by saline and positioned close to the micropipette, 0.5 mm above and perpendicular to the exposed nasal mucosa surface. The monochromatic light (632.8 nm) from the He-Ne-laser has been shown to penetrate skin to a depth of ~1 mm (19). The laser-Doppler signal (i.e., LDF) was not influenced by local application of saline or by administration of saline into the nasal cavity in volumes equal to volumes in the experimental protocol. Output values from the laser-Doppler flowmeter might differ among animals, probably because of varying laser beam penetrations and slight differences in probe position. However, provided the probe position in individual experiments is unchanged, the output values in control measurements remained fairly stable, even in experiments of several hours' duration. Flow changes obtained after drug applications were therefore calculated as percentages of the baseline values (100%) obtained during control conditions.

Drugs

The drugs were administered intranasally to the exposed part of the nasal mucosa or close intra-arterially in the ipsilateral superior thyroid artery. All drugs were freshly dissolved in 0.9% NaCl saline, and dosages were tested in pilot experiments to avoid major changes in systemic arterial pressure. To induce an acute inflammatory response, dextran 40 (Rheomacrodex, 100 mg/ml; Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) was administered intra-arterially and histamine (dihydrochloride crystalline, Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO) was administered topically into the nasal cavity. Saline was administered intranasally or intra-arterially as the control, in volumes equivalent to the test volumes.

Experimental Protocol

Two series of experiments with inflammatory mediators were carried out, each series being divided into two groups, one with intact circulation throughout the experiment. In the other, circulatory arrest was induced 1 min after administration of the inflammatory agent.

Series I: Dextran. Dextran 40 (0.5 ml) was injected slowly (30 s) into the superior thyroid artery.

INTACT CIRCULATION. Simultaneous measurements of Ps, LDF, and MAP were made before, during, and after dextran infusion (n = 10). After injection of dextran, measurements were continued for up to 1 h. The effect of dextran infusion on Pif and MAP was measured for the same time interval in six separate animals.

CIRCULATORY ARREST. Control Pif was measured immediately before dextran injection. One minute after drug injection, circulatory arrest was induced by intravenous infusion of 0.5 ml saturated potassium chloride (n = 6). Measurement of Pif was performed 5-60 min after circulatory arrest. In five separate control rats, Pif was measured before and after intra-arterial injection of 0.5 ml saline.

Series II: Histamine. Twenty-five microliters of histamine solution (1 mg/ml) were deposited in the nasal cavity.

INTACT CIRCULATION. The effect of histamine on Ps, LDF, and MAP was recorded simultaneously (n = 6), as described above (dextran group). Pif was measured before and at the end of the experiment (n = 5).

CIRCULATORY ARREST. Control Pif was measured before histamine application. One minute after intranasal application of histamine, circulatory arrest was induced by intravenous infusion of 0.3 ml saturated potassium chloride (n = 6), and Pif was measured during the next 60 min. In four separate rats, Pif was measured after intranasal application of saline as a control.

Statistical Evaluation

Data are given as means ± SD, and statistical analysis was performed by using Student's paired or unpaired t-tests for two-tailed distribution. P values of < 0.05 were considered to be significant.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Series I: Dextran as an Inflammatory Mediator

Intact circulation. During control conditions, Ps was 9.9 ± 1.3 mmHg. After dextran infusion, Ps increased significantly to 10.9 ± 1.4 mmHg (P < 0.01) within 10 min and reached a maximal value of 11.5 ± 1.7 mmHg (P < 0.01) 40 min after dextran infusion (Table 1). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) decreased significantly in control (P < 0.05) from 114 ± 20 to 109 ± 25 mmHg 11-20 min after dextran infusion. The decrease in MAP, from ~20 min after drug challenge, averaged 13-15 mmHg and lasted throughout the experimental period. LDF increased by 36% (P < 0.01) compared with control values (Table 1). The vasodilatatory effect was seen 10 min after dextran infusion and lasted 40 min (P < 0.05), and thereafter it began to fade. Pif in control was 2.2 ± 0.4 mmHg and increased significantly to 3.1 ± 0.5 mmHg (P < 0.01) at 30 min after dextran infusion (Fig. 1). After 60 min, Pif was 3.8 ± 0.21 mmHg. In all rats with intact circulation, an edema was apparent in the nose area of the rat; this was visualized by loss of skin markings and swelling. Some of the rats also developed respiratory distress during the experiments. Recordings of Pif in rat nasal mucosa in the same experimental setup have earlier been shown to be stable for several hours in untreated animals (12).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Effect of dextran and histamine on pressures and blood flow in rat nasal mucosa


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Effect of close intra-arterial infusion of dextran (open circle , n = 6) and histamine intranasally (, n = 5) on interstitial fluid pressure (Pif) in rat nasal mucosa with intact circulation. Values are means ± SD. * P < 0.05 compared with control values.

Circulatory arrest. Control Pif before dextran infusion and circulatory arrest was 1.9 ± 0.6 mmHg. After dextran infusion and circulatory arrest, Pif decreased significantly to subatmospheric values, on average -0.8 ± 0.8 mmHg within 30 min after start of infusion (Fig. 2). This decrease persisted throughout the experiment. Intra-arterial saline injections had no significant effect on Pif (Fig. 2).


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Effect of close intra-arterial infusion of dextran (open circle , n = 6) and saline (bullet , n = 5) and intranasal histamine (, n = 6) and saline (, n = 4) on Pif in rat nasal mucosa after circulatory arrest. Values are means ± SD. * P < 0.05 compared with control values.

Series II: Histamine as an Inflammatory Mediator

Intact circulation. During control conditions, Ps and MAP were 14.1 ± 2.3 and 110 ± 10 mmHg, respectively (Table 1). After intranasal application of histamine, Ps and MAP did not change significantly compared with control values. However, histamine caused an initial increase (36%) in LDF compared with control values during the first 20 min (Table 1). Thereafter, the LDF outputs remained elevated but were not significantly different from control values (Table 1). Pif also increased significantly (P < 0.05) from 1.6 ± 0.9 mmHg during control measurements to 2.9 ± 0.6 mmHg at the end of the experiment (Fig. 1).

Circulatory arrest. The control Pif before histamine challenge was 1.8 ± 0.6 mmHg. After histamine application, Pif decreased gradually to a minimum value of -3.3 ± 1.2 mmHg within 20 min (Fig. 2). The pressure then rose gradually but was still significantly lower than the control value 1 h after circulatory arrest (Fig. 2). Saline administered intranasally (n = 4) did not change Pif significantly during the experiment (Fig. 2).

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The present study reports, for the first time, measurements of Pif in the nasal mucosa during acute inflammation in rats. When the circulation was intact, the inflammatory mediators dextran and histamine significantly increased Pif and LDF concomitantly with edema formation. Dextran also significantly increased Ps, whereas no such effect was seen with histamine. Inflammation in the nasal mucosa has been shown to increase the mucosal volume because of augmented IFV and/or blood volume (18). Because dextran infusion increases both Ps and LDF, despite MAP reduction, a considerable decrease in vascular resistance seems to take place, mainly through precapillary vasodilation. Accordingly, capillary hydrostatic pressure is increased, favoring transcapillary fluid filtration. Increased capillary fluid flux may also result from increased vascular permeability. Although the present experiments were not designed to determine this, there is substantial experimental evidence that histamine (4) or anaphylaxis induced by dextran (9) causes enhanced exudation of plasma proteins. Dextran edema is thought to be mediated by mast cell degranulation, releasing the inflammatory mediator histamine (24). Increased IFV has been measured in rat trachea and skin in dextran anaphylaxis (9, 21). Histamine acts directly on the microvascular endothelial cells via histamine receptors (7, 26), causing increased permeability and plasma extravasation (4). Taken together, it seems reasonable to suggest that the augmented IFV and edema are caused by increased capillary pressure and permeability.

Both histamine and dextran significantly increased Pif. It might therefore be speculated that the increased Pif during inflammatory reactions would favor fluid transport out of the mucosa into the nasal cavity. A similar mechanism for transepithelial bulk flow of fluid has recently been proposed by Persson et al. (20) and Gustafsson and Persson (5). They demonstrated that a rise in serosal pressure of 5 cmH2O (~3.5 mmHg) caused transport of macromolecules across the epithelium and into the tracheal lumen in vitro. They suggested that the increased hydrostatic pressure in the mucosal tissue transiently separated the tight junctions of the tracheal epithelium to allow plasma transport along the interstitial-luminal hydrostatic pressure gradient. Thus increased subepithelial hydrostatic pressure might move plasma exudate across the respiratory epithelium through pericellular pathways (4). An analogy to this hypothesis has been proposed for the intestinal mucosa by Granger et al. (3). They described a passive fluid transport (filtration secretion) from the vasculature, through the interstitium, and into the intestinal lumen because of increased net capillary filtration pressure, in turn elevating tissue pressure, providing a low-resistance pathway for fluid transport into the intestinal lumen (3).

During control with intact circulation, Pif was consistently above atmospheric pressure, with a mean Pif ranging from 1.6 to 2.1 mmHg in the experimental groups. Inflammation induced with dextran anaphylaxis or histamine resulted in a dramatic decrease in Pif to subatmospheric values within 10 min after circulatory arrest. Pif remained subatmospheric throughout the experimental period, with mean maximal negative values being, on average, -3.3 mmHg (histamine) and -0.8 mmHg (dextran) at 20-30 min circulatory arrest. A similar response has previously been observed in inflammatory reactions in the skin (5, 21) and the trachea (9, 19). When dextran was given with an intact circulation, Pif in the rat paw skin initially decreased and then increased to positive values as edema developed (21). This decrease in Pif will act concomitantly with increased capillary hydrostatic pressure and permeability in the initial edema formation to enhance transcapillary fluid flux (23). Pif in the present experiments remained unchanged up to 60 min after circulatory arrest in the saline control groups, indicating that no or very minute amounts of fluid are removed from the interstitium during this time period. A decrease in intravascular pressure due to circulatory arrest, evaporation from the nasal cavity, or increased lymphatic flow may have dehydrated the nasal mucosa, inducing increased negativity of Pif. However, the constant Pif after circulatory arrest in the saline control group speaks against this because a continuous and gradual decrease in Pif should have been expected. By exclusion, therefore, the negative Pif measured after circulatory arrest may suggest that the interstitium may play an active role in nasal mucosal edema formation during inflammation. With intact circulation, the Pif can be active only until capillary filtration has caused fluid accumulation in the interstitium and increased Pif. With intact circulation there was no decrease in Pif after inflammatory provocation, as opposed to a decrease in Pif after circulatory arrest. A similar observation has been made in burned skin, where Pif became more negative when fluid entrance into the injured tissue was prevented (15). A low compliance in the mucosa will contribute to attenuate a decrease in Pif in the groups with intact circulation because little fluid needs to be added to attenuate the increased negativity of Pif. Consequently, after circulatory arrest, when nearly no transcapillary fluid flux takes place, swelling of hyaluronal/glycosaminoglycans gel (16) may create increased negativity of Pif because of structural rearrangements, probably perturbation of the beta 1-integrins, which release the tension exerted by connective tissue cells on extracellular matrix components (22). Histamine alone induced a larger decrease in Pif than did the dextran-induced anaphylaxis, suggesting that substances other than histamine released on mast cell degranulation participate in creating an increased negativity of Pif. Alternatively, it might be a dose-response phenomenon, i.e., the amount of histamine released by the mast cells is less than that administered in the experiments.

The LDF method demonstrated increased blood flow after dextran and histamine. Local blood flow in the nasal mucosa has previously been obtained by the LDF method (12, 13). The principal advantage of the LDF method is that it is noninvasive and allows a continuous recording. However, blood flow is not being obtained in absolute units, and the LDF signal is not linearly related to blood flow unless there is a fairly constant concentration of red blood cells in the tissue (24). In the present experiments vascular congestion and tissue edema during inflammation may have influenced the LDF output values. An increased tissue hematocrit because of vascular congestion will increase the LDF signal. The average tissue blood volume in the rat nasal mucosa increases from 0.13 ml/g during decongestion to 0.25 ml/g during hyperemia and congestion (12). Although the edema that develops after inflammatory provocations may to some extent attenuate this increase in tissue blood volume, it is unlikely to be as large as the increase in vascular volume, thus validating at least the trend in the present measurements. The measurement of unchanged Ps during histamine administration is not readily explained because histamine has a vasodilating effect on the nasal mucosa in experimental animals (2, 8). The unchanged Ps might be explained by a nearly equal decrease in pre- and postsinusoidal resistance. Alternatively, too-low doses of histamine were used for topical application. However, because higher doses (unpublished observations) gave a significant decrease in systemic arterial blood pressure, this seems implausible. The lack of a histamine effect on Ps may also be explained by the fact that the histamine group in control starts at a higher Ps compared with the dextran group (Table 1), which might have blocked or obscured a possible response.

In short, the present experiments have shown that inflammation increases the nasal mucosal Pif at maintained circulation, whereas a decrease in Pif was measured after circulatory arrest. The increased Pif will be part of the net driving pressure for the promptly appearing exudation across the airway mucosa after inflammatory provocations. The decreased Pif measured after circulatory arrest suggests that structural components in the mucosa may be part of the initial development of the edema in the nasal mucosa.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank Dr. Rolf K. Reed for valuable discussions and comments on the manuscript. The technical assistance of Åse Rye Eriksen is appreciated.

    FOOTNOTES

The present study received financial support from the Norwegian Council for Science.

Address for reprint requests: A. Berg, Dept. of Physiology, Univ. of Bergen, Årstadveien 19, N-5009 Bergen, Norway (E-mail: Ansgar{at}pki.uib.no).

Received 30 October 1997; accepted in final form 24 March 1998.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1.   Aukland, K., and R. K. Reed. Interstitial-lymphatic mechanism in the control of extracellular fluid volume. Physiol. Rev. 73: 1-78, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

2.   Clairmont, A. A., R. Wright, E. Dempsey, P. A. Sheffield, and R. T. Jackson. Blood flow in otorhinologic tissues after histamine and papaverine. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 82: 69-74, 1973[Medline].

3.   Granger, D. N., N. A. Mortillaro, and A. E. Taylor. Interactions of intestinal lymph flow and secretion. Am. J. Physiol. 232 (Endocrinol. Metab. Gastrointest. Physiol. 1): E13-E18, 1977.

4.   Greiff, L., I. Erjefält, C. Svensson, P. Wollmer, U. Alker, M. Andersson, and C. G. Persson. Plasma exudation and solute absorption across the airway mucosa. Clin. Physiol. 13: 219-233, 1993[Medline].

5.   Gustafsson, B. G., and C. G. Persson. Asymmetrical effects of increases in hydrostatic pressure on macromolecular movement across the airway mucosa. A study in guinea-pig tracheal tube preparations. Clin. Exp. Allergy 21: 121-126, 1991[Medline].

6.  Halpern, B. N. Histamine release by long chain molecules. Ciba Found. Symp. 92-123, 1956.

7.   Heltianu, C., M. Simionescu, and N. Simionescu. Histamine receptors of the microvascular endothelium revealed in situ with a histamine-ferritin conjugate: characteristic high-affinity binding sites in venules. J. Cell Biol. 93: 357-364, 1982[Abstract/Free Full Text].

8.   Hiley, C. R., H. Wilson, and M. S. Yates. Identification of beta-adrenoceptors and histamine receptors in the cat nasal vasculature. Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh.) 85: 444-448, 1978[Medline].

9.   Koller, M.-E., and R. K. Reed. Increased negativity of interstitial fluid pressure in rat trachea in dextran anaphylaxis. J. Appl. Physiol. 72: 53-57, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

10.   Koller, M.-E., K. Woie, and R. K. Reed. Increased negativity of interstitial fluid pressure in rat trachea after mast cell degranulation. J. Appl. Physiol. 74: 2135-2139, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

11.   Korthuis, R. J., C. Y. Wang, and J. B. Scott. Transient effects of histamine on microvascular fluid movement. Microvasc. Res. 23: 316-328, 1982[Medline].

12.   Kristiansen, A. B., K. J. Heyeraas, and A. Kirkebø. Increased pressure in venous sinusoids during decongestion of rat nasal mucosa induced by adrenergic agonists. Acta Physiol. Scand. 147: 151-161, 1993[Medline].

13.   Lacroix, J. S., P. Stjärne, A. Änggard, and J. M. Lundberg. Sympathetic vascular control of the pig nasal mucosa: co-release of noradrenaline and neuropeptide Y. Acta Physiol. Scand. 135: 17-28, 1989[Medline].

14.   Lund, T., H. Onarheim, H. Wiig, and R. K. Reed. Mechanism behind the increased dermal imbibition pressure in acute burn edema. Am. J. Physiol. 256 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 25): H940-H948, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

15.   Lund, T., H. Wiig, and R. K. Reed. Acute postburn edema: role of strongly negative interstitial fluid pressure. Am. J. Physiol. 255 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 24): H1069-H1074, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].

16.   Meyer, F. A. Macromolecular basis of globular protein exclusion and of swelling pressure in loose connective tissue (umbilical cord). Biochim. Biophys. Acta 755: 388-399, 1983[Medline].

17.   Mygind, N. Nasal Allergy. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1978.

18.   Mygind, N., and U. Pipkorn. Allergic and Vasomotoric Rhinitis, Pathophysiological Aspects. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1987, p. 63-76.

19.   Nilsson, G. E., T. Tenland, and P. A. Öberg. Evaluation of a laser Doppler flowmeter for measurements of tissue blood flow. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 27: 597-604, 1980[Medline].

20.   Persson, C. G., I. Erjefält, B. Gustafsson, and A. Luts. Subepithelial hydrostatic pressure may regulate plasma exudation across the mucosa. Int. Arch. Allergy Appl. Immunol. 92: 148-153, 1990[Medline].

21.   Reed, R. K., and S. Å. Rodt. Increased negativity of interstitial fluid pressure during the onset stage of inflammatory edema in rat skin. Am. J. Physiol. 260 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 29): H1985-H1991, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

22.   Reed, R. K., K. Rubin, H. Wiig, and S. Å. Rodt. Blockade of beta 1-integrins in skin causes edema through lowering of interstitial fluid pressure. Circ. Res. 71: 978-983, 1992[Abstract].

23.   Reed, R. K., K. Woie, and K. Rubin. Integrins and control of interstitial fluid pressure. News Physiol. Sci. 12: 42-48, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24.   Roman, R. J., and C. Smits. Laser-Doppler determination of papillary blood flow in young and adult rats. Am. J. Physiol. 251 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 20): F115-F124, 1986[Abstract/Free Full Text].

25.   Schwartz, L. B., and K. F. Austen. Structure and function of the chemical mediators of mast cells. Prog. Allergy 34: 271-321, 1984[Medline].

26.   Simionescu, N., C. Heltianu, F. Antohe, and M. Simionescu. Endothelial cell receptors for histamine. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 401: 132-149, 1982[Medline].

27.   Wiederhielm, C. A., J. W. Woodbury, S. Kirk, and R. F. Rushmer. Pulsative pressure in the microcirculation of the frog's mesentery. Am. J. Physiol. 207: 173-176, 1964.


J APPL PHYSIOL 85(2):465-470
8570-7587/98 $5.00 Copyright © 1998 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
A. Bletsa, T. Nedrebo, K.J. Heyeraas, and E. Berggreen
Edema in oral mucosa after LPS or cytokine exposure.
J. Dent. Res., May 1, 2006; 85(5): 442 - 446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. Berg, K. Rubin, and R. K. Reed
Cytochalasin D induces edema formation and lowering of interstitial fluid pressure in rat dermis
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2001; 281(1): H7 - H13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
T. Nedrebo, A. Berg, and R. K. Reed
Effect of tumor necrosis factor-alpha , IL-1beta , and IL-6 on interstitial fluid pressure in rat skin
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 1999; 277(5): H1857 - H1862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berg, A.
Right arrow Articles by Heyeraas, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berg, A.
Right arrow Articles by Heyeraas, K. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online