Journal of Applied Physiology Journal of Neurophysiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 84: 1801-1816, 1998;
8750-7587/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matthie, J.
Right arrow Articles by Withers, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Matthie, J.
Right arrow Articles by Withers, P.
Vol. 84, Issue 5, 1801-1816, May 1998

SPECIAL COMMUNICATION
Analytic assessment of the various bioimpedance methods used to estimate body water

J. Matthie1, B. Zarowitz2, A. De Lorenzo3, A. Andreoli3, K. Katzarski4, G. Pan1, and P. Withers1

1 Medical Department, Xitron Technologies, San Diego, California 92121; 2 Ambulatory Pharmacy Administration, Henry Ford Health System, Bingham Farms, Michigan 48025; 3 Department of Physiology, University of Rome "Tor Vergata," 1-00173 Rome, Italy; and 4 Division of Renal Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge University Hospital, S-14186 Huddinge, Sweden

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Knowledge of patient fluid distribution would be useful clinically. Both single-frequency (SF) and impedance modeling approaches are proposed. The high intercorrelation between body water compartments makes determining the best approach difficult. This study was conducted to evaluate the merits of an SF approach. Mathematical simulation was performed to determine the effect of tissue change on resistance and reactance. Dilution results were reanalyzed, and resistance and parallel reactance were used to predict the intracellular water for two groups. Results indicated that the amount of intracellular and extracellular water conduction at any SF can vary with tissue change, and reactance at any SF is affected by all tissue parameters. Modeling provided a good prediction of dilution intracellular and extracellular water, but an SF method did not. Intracellular, extracellular, and total body water were equally predicted at all frequencies by SF resistance and parallel reactance. Extracellular and intracellular water are best measured through modeling, because only at the zero and infinite frequencies are the results sensitive only to extracellular and intracellular water. At all other frequencies there are other effects.

bioimpedance spectroscopy; body cell mass; extracellular water; intracellular water; total body water

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

KNOWLEDGE OF PATIENT FLUID distribution would be very useful for guiding drug and renal replacement therapy as well as nutritional support. Drug and renal replacement therapy to alleviate excess fluid, as well as drug dosage, is presently prescribed using only gross estimates of fluid distribution. Inaccurate information about fluid distribution can change drug disposition and requirement and cause serious acute and long-term complications for a dialysis patient. Nutritional status is generally assessed with often unreliable chemical and anthropometric methods. Dilution methods are tedious, and magnetic resonance imaging, computer axial tomography, and whole body counting are expensive and not suited for routine use. Some investigators are attempting to use an X-ray-determined fat-free mass to assess nutritional status, but this method cannot distinguish the contribution of water to the estimate of fat-free mass. A loss in body cell mass (BCM) with a concurrent increase in extracellular water (ECW) (25, 36) would result in no detectable change in fat-free mass. A simple, inexpensive, accurate, and reliable noninvasive method of determining fluid distribution is needed. Impedance methods are increasingly being used to fulfill this need.

Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS), which means fitting measured impedance spectral data to a physical model, is a well-known analytic technique (19). All the underlying principles used today in the impedance-body composition field came from the use of this technique in biophysics (8). In review, there is little conduction through skeletal muscle tissue at low frequency (1-5 kHz), and the impedance is principally a function of the ECW. As frequency increases, conduction through the intracellular water (ICW) increases. At high frequency (10-100 MHz) the ICW becomes fully conductive, and the impedance is a function of both ECW and ICW (Fig. 1). This phenomenon is caused by cell membrane capacitance (Cm) and named beta -dispersion (4, 31). Thus at very low and very high frequencies the overall impedance is essentially independent of the Cm, whereas at the mid- or characteristic frequency (fc) the dependence on the value of Cm is at a maximum. The fc can also be defined as the frequency of maximum reactance. Two different phenomena discovered at very low frequency (<1 kHz) and very high frequency (>100 MHz) are named alpha - and gamma -dispersions, respectively (31). Impedance spectral data measured on biological tissue produce a semicircle with a suppressed center when resistance and reactance are plotted (Fig. 2). The physical model most widely used since 1940 (23) to interpret this phenomenon is the Cole model (3). The Cole model consists of the terms resistance ECW (RE), resistance ICW (RI), Cm, and the exponent alpha . It should be noted that the relationship between RE and RI and their respective volumes is not simple, because of the nonlinear effects of the concentration of nonconductor on the impedance (4, 41). Thus RE and RI are only model terms, but for simplicity RE and RI are expressed as resistance ECW and ICW, respectively. The Cole model is computed by using nonlinear curve fitting to extrapolate the data to the low- and high-frequency limits (19) (Figs. 1 and 2). These limits are known as resistance at the zero frequency (R0), which is the same as RE, and resistance at the infinite frequency (Rinfinity ). RI is computed as 1/RI = 1/Rinfinity  - 1/R0. Although the Cole model is a mathematical model and cannot be correctly represented as an equivalent electronic circuit, an analog representation is shown in Fig. 3. Because biological tissue consists of multiple parameters, modeling is considered essential, because it is the only means of independently analyzing the different parameters (19).


View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Frequency vs. resistance measured on 8 patients within 2 h after cardiac surgery (time 3). Resistance at zero (R0) and infinite (Rinfinity ) frequencies is represented by 1 Hz and 100 MHz, respectively.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Resistance vs. reactance measured in 1 patient within 2 h after cardiac surgery (time 3). R0 and Rinfinity are represented by 1 Hz and 100 MHz, respectively. fc, Characteristic frequency (i.e., frequency of maximum reactance).


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Equivalent electrical circuit analogous to Cole model. RE, resistance extracellular water (in Omega ); RI, resistance intracellular water (in Omega ); Cm, membrane capacitance (in F).

Thomasset was the first to attempt to apply this biophysics knowledge clinically in 1963 (34). He proposed use of dual-frequency impedance (i.e., 1 and 100 kHz) as a measure of ECW and total body water (TBW), respectively (12, 34). An overwhelming number of different impedance methods and multiple regression equations have since been introduced. The field is now divided along three major lines of reasoning. The first is the 50-kHz single-frequency impedance method that was originally proposed as a measure of TBW (12) and fat-free mass (18, 26). With little scientific explanation, this method evolved into a measure of both ECW and TBW (16) and now into a measure of TBW and BCM (2, 14, 15, 24, 33). The second is prediction of ECW and TBW by low (e.g., 1-5 kHz)- and high (e.g., 100-500 kHz)-frequency impedance (5, 32). The third is use of a BIS or Cole modeling approach (4, 6, 11, 13, 38-40).

Because ECW and ICW are tightly regulated biologically and are parts of the TBW, impedance measured at virtually any frequency in the 1-kHz to 1-MHz range equally predicts ECW, ICW, and TBW (40). This high intercorrelation between the body water compartments has made determining the best approach difficult. A plethora of single-frequency impedance equations have been published, but cross validation and detection of small changes in volume have generally been difficult. As defined by the Cole model (3), biological tissue consists of four parameters. A single-frequency impedance consists of two data (i.e., resistance and reactance). It may be that single-frequency impedance equations do not cross validate well or detect small changes because they rely on the tissue elements having relative uniformity between individuals and when their tissue changes. There is also good reason to believe that at any frequency other than zero and infinity the impedance measurement would be affected, because a different amount of volume would be measured when a change in fc occurred. To test these and other research questions, we conducted an evaluation. Impedance spectral data measured before and after infusion during cardiac surgery and before and after hemodialysis were compared with the results of mathematical simulation. This determined the sensitivity of resistance and reactance to changes in the parameters of the Cole model. Previous deuterium and sodium bromide results reported on cardiac surgery patients (28) were reevaluated after use of different apparent ECW and ICW resistivity constants in the volume equation we developed from mixture theory (4). This analysis was conducted because only the differences between methods had been reported (28), and it has been discovered that the scaling of the apparent resistivity depends on dilution method and protocol (4). To ascertain the validity of the recently proposed parallel reactance (XP) model (14, 15), we computed XP at multiple frequencies and predicted the deuterium-sodium bromide space (i.e., ICW) measured on the cardiac surgery patients. To test for sample dependency, total body potassium (TBK) measured on a second sample was compared with TBK predicted by XP at multiple frequencies.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The cardiac surgery study was conducted at Henry Ford Hospital and approved by the Henry Ford Human Research Committee; written informed consent was obtained from each subject. Eight men, after elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery, elected to participate. On the patients' arrival at the intensive care unit, body weight was measured to the nearest 1 kg with a standard balance, with the patient dressed in a hospital gown. Body height was measured to the nearest 1 cm with a stadiometer. Within 2 h of the patients' arrival, two blood samples were taken to establish baseline deuterium and sodium bromide concentrations. Patients then were measured preoperatively (time 1) with a single-frequency device (1 frequency at 50 kHz; model BIA 101, RJL Systems, Detroit, MI). Patients were then immediately measured with a multiple-frequency impedance device (44 frequencies logarithmically spaced between 1 kHz and 1.348 MHz; model 4000B, Xitron Technologies, San Diego, CA). Patients were placed in a supine position on their beds with limbs slightly abducted. Skin current electrodes (model IS4000, Xitron Technologies) were placed on the right dorsal surface of the hand and foot at the metacarpals and metatarsals. Voltage-detector skin electrodes were placed at the right pisiform prominence of the wrist and between the medial and lateral malleoli at the ankle. Electrode placement was marked for subsequent measurements, and, when possible, electrodes were left in place for the duration of the study.

Within 2 h after surgery, the patients underwent bioimpedance testing again (time 2). Patients also received 10 g of intravenous solution of deuterium (9 ml of 99.9% 2H2O) and 30 mmol of sodium bromide (10 ml of a 3 mmol/ml solution of sodium bromide) over 2 min through a central venous catheter. After 4 h of equilibration, two additional blood samples were taken to determine postequilibration concentrations (17, 29, 35). To predict ECW and TBW volumes, bioimpedance was measured again immediately after blood sampling (time 3). Blood samples were collected in serum separator tubes, and the clotted samples were centrifuged for 30 min. Mass spectroscopy (Metabolic Solutions, Boston, MA) was used for deuterium analysis, and TBW was calculated using the method of Schoeller et al. (30). Sodium bromide concentrations were measured using an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (PlasmaQuad2+, VG Elemental, Winsford, Cheshire, UK). Corrected sodium bromide space was then estimated using the method of Price et al. (29), whereby a correction is made for sodium bromide uptake into the red blood cells and for Donnan equilibration. Dilution ICW was computed by deuterium-sodium bromide.

The effects of isotonic saline infusion during surgery and after recovery from surgery on the Cole model parameters were analyzed. Impedance measurements were taken on day 2, 24 h postdilution steady-state equilibration (time 4), and on day 3, 48 h postdilution steady-state equilibration (time 5). Patients received an average of 2.1 liters of infused fluid during surgery.

For the single-frequency method, ECW and TBW volumes were predicted by applying the measured resistance and reactance measured at time 3 to the same statistical equations used by Patel et al. (28; see also Refs. 24 and 37). For the BIS method a nonlinear curve-fitting program described previously (4) was used to fit impedance and phase spectral data to the Cole model. Cole model terms RE and RI were used in a volume equation we developed from mixture theory to predict ECW and ICW volumes, respectively (4). TBW was computed as ECW + ICW. Recorded fluid inputs and outputs were used to calculate estimated body weight at the time of dilution steady state from baseline. As discussed previously (4), the mixture-volume equation utilizes apparent ECW and ICW resistivity constants. The constants used by Patel et al. (28) were previously established from deuterium and sodium bromide data (38) and cross validated (27). The male ECW and ICW constants used to predict ECW and ICW were 214 and 824 Omega  · cm, respectively (28). Also, these terms are only apparent resistivities, because they are affected by geometry when a wrist-to-ankle measurement is made. (For a full discussion see Ref. 4.) For the statistical analysis the Microsoft Excel program was used. In addition to the descriptive statistics, Pearson's product moment correlation and standard error of estimate (SEE) statistics were computed for the relationship among dilution-, single-frequency-, and BIS-determined ECW, TBW, and ICW volumes.

Resistivity constants computed from deuterium and sodium bromide data collected by De Lorenzo et al. (4) were then used to repredict ECW and ICW volume. The male values used for ECW and ICW were 174 and 1,177 Omega  · cm, respectively. The correlation, SEE, mean, and mean differences were recomputed. New resistivity constants for the ECW and ICW were then computed by regressing the samples computed by Cole model terms RE and RI against their dilution-determined ECW and ICW volumes, respectively. The equation and methods we used to compute resistivity have been described previously (4, 11). The ECW and ICW resistivity constants became 229 and 1,054 Omega  · cm, respectively.

Reactance at 5, 10, 49, 100, 204, 424, and 876 kHz measured at time 3 was transformed into XP by using the recently proposed equation: XP = reactance + resistance2/reactance (14, 15). XP was then used in the male multiple regression equations published by Kotler et al. (14) to predict the dilution ICW: 254 * Ht2/XP + 1,493, where Ht is height (simple linear equation), 59.06 * Ht1.6/X0.5P (base exponential equation), and 0.76 * 59.06 * Ht1.6/X0.5P + 18.52 * weight - 386.66 (exponential prediction equation). Although 49 kHz, rather than 50 kHz, was used, it is virtually equivalent. Predicting dilution ICW with a TBK equation has validity, because potassium is primarily distributed in the ICW and any relationship between TBK and BCM is through the TBK-ICW relationship (7). To test for intercorrelation between variables, dilution ICW was also predicted by the simple Ht2/resistance equation at all frequencies. To further test for intercorrelation, dilution ECW and TBW volumes were predicted at all frequencies by each of the above XP equations. The descriptive statistics, correlation and SEE, were computed.

To test for sample-dependent variation, we conducted the same XP analysis on a second group of 48 healthy Italian men 26-57 yr of age. This study, which was performed at University of Rome "Tor Vergata," was approved by their Medical Ethical Committee. The subjects volunteered to participate in the study (4), and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. On the subjects' arrival in the morning in an overnight-fasted state, body weight was measured to the nearest 0.05 kg with a standard balance, with the subjects dressed in swimming clothes. Body height was measured to the nearest 1 mm with a stadiometer. After the measurement of weight and height and with the subjects still in the fasting state, 40K was measured with a whole body counter. The whole body counter was formed by a cell 2.5 m wide and 3 m high of 10-cm-thick lead bricks, the door of which was formed by a 22-cm-thick iron slab. The room was continuously ventilated. A single 20.3 × 10.2-cm thallium-activated sodium iodine crystal was positioned above the subject, who was measured in a sitting position and dressed only in paper pajamas. TBK was calculated as 40K * 8,474.6 (7). The coefficient of variation for TBK was 2-3%. ICW volume was computed by assuming that TBK is present only in the ICW and that potassium concentration in the ICW is 150 mM (7). After the measurement of weight, height, and TBK, wrist-to-ankle (i.e., whole body) impedance spectra, consisting of 21 frequencies ranging from 1 kHz to 1.348 MHz, were measured with the same model multiple-frequency impedance device described above. The measurements were taken within the first several minutes after the subjects assumed a supine position. The measurements were taken on the left side of the body with use of disposable electrocardiograph electrodes (5 cm2, 3M, Minneapolis, MN) and in accordance with the standard wrist-to-ankle protocol discussed above (38). The impedance and phase spectral data were fit to the Cole model. The equation described above (14, 15) was used to transform reactance at 5, 10, 50, 100, 200, 500, and 748 kHz into XP. Transformed XP was used in the same equations to predict the TBK-determined ICW of 48 healthy Italian men. Predicting ICW with a TBK equation has validity, and any error in assuming the potassium concentration in the ICW would only result in a scaling difference (7). The frequencies differed from those used for the cardiac patients, because different software, which requested a different set of frequencies from the device, was used.

To investigate the effects of fluid and solute removal through hemodialysis, impedance spectral data measured on 16 patients before and after hemodialysis were fit to the Cole model and analyzed. This study, which was conducted at the Karolinska Institute, was approved by the Huddinge Hospital Medical Ethical Committee. The patients (10 men and 6 women), ranging in age from 35 to 84 yr, volunteered to participate in the study. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. The patients were randomly selected from 28 hemodialysis patients. The amount of fluid removed by ultrafiltration ranged from 0.08 to 3.96 liters. Treatment lasted for 4-4.5 h. Blood flow was 250-300 ml/min, dialysate flow was 500 ml/min, dialysate sodium concentration was 141 mM, and bicarbonate concentration was 34 mM. Dialysis machines (model AK 100, Gambro) and several types of dialyzers (models AC 130 and 170, Baxter, and models GEF 15 and GEF 18, Gambro) were used. Temperature did not change during the procedure. On the patients' arrival in the dialysis unit and after hemodialysis, body weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg with a standard balance. Body height was measured to the nearest 1 cm with a stadiometer. After the patients were in a supine position on a bed for 20 min, wrist-to-ankle (i.e., whole body) impedance spectra, consisting of 50 frequencies ranging from 5 to 500 kHz, were measured with the multiple-frequency device described above. The measurements were taken on the side opposite the side with the arteriovenous fistula by use of skin electrodes (model IS4000, Xitron Technologies) and in accordance with the standard wrist-to-ankle protocol discussed above. Electrodes were left in place throughout the study, and patients remained in a supine position throughout the treatment. After termination of treatment, impedance spectra were measured again, and the data were fit to the Cole model. Descriptive statistics were computed, and the spectral data were graphically formatted. The difference in impedance before and after dialysis at the low- and high-frequency limits (i.e., R0 and Rinfinity ) and at 5 and 500 kHz was compared.

To simulate the sensitivity of resistance and reactance to changes in the parameters of the Cole model, we computed resistance and reactance at multiple frequencies in the 100-Hz to 10-MHz frequency range (i.e., beta -dispersion) (3, 31) for nominal data and with the modeled parameters changed. Nominal data were Cole modeling results obtained previously on one healthy adult woman (27) and previously reported dispersion data outside the beta -dispersion range on skeletal muscle tissue (3, 31). At each frequency, resistance and reactance were computed with the Cole model term alpha  set at 0.63 and 1, after 5 liters were added to the ICW and ECW, and for fc changed from 40 to 100 kHz. The resistance and reactance data were then plotted vs. log frequency with use of a Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet program.

To properly evaluate the single-frequency XP proposal, we performed a mathematical modeling evaluation (MATLAB, Math Works, Natick, MA). This was performed to ascertain the interaction between XP and the biophysical parameters expressed in the Cole model. Use of the Cole model had validity, because it is the model most widely used to interpret impedance measurements of biological tissue (23), and measured data in vivo fit it with high precision (4). Impedance spectral data of one healthy Asian man were fit to the Cole model. Nominal values were 594.9 Omega  for RE, 935.6 Omega  for RI, 2.85 nF for Cm, and 0.7 for alpha . For frequencies of 5, 50, and 200 kHz and 1 MHz, we individually varied RE, RI, Cm, and alpha  ±20% in 1% increments. The following equations were used to compute XP at each 1% increment for each frequency ( f). For the Cole model, we have the impedance (Z) equation
Z = <FR><NU>R<SUB>E</SUB></NU><DE>R<SUB>E</SUB> + R<SUB>I</SUB></DE></FR> ⋅ <FENCE>R<SUB>I</SUB> + <FR><NU>R<SUB>E</SUB></NU><DE>1 + [ <IT>j</IT> ⋅ &ohgr; ⋅<IT>C</IT><SUB>m</SUB> ⋅ (R<SUB>E</SUB> + R<SUB>I</SUB>)]<SUP>&agr;</SUP></DE></FR></FENCE> (1)
where omega  = 2pi f and j = <RAD><RCD>−1</RCD></RAD>. Let RS and XS be the series resistance and reactance of the impedance, respectively; i.e.
Z = R<SUB>S</SUB> + <IT>j</IT> ⋅ X<SUB>S</SUB> (2)
From Eqs. 1 and 2, one derives
R<SUB>S</SUB> = <FR><NU>R<SUB>E</SUB></NU><DE>R<SUB>E</SUB> + R<SUB>I</SUB></DE></FR> ⋅ <FENCE>R<SUB>I</SUB> + <FR><NU>R<SUB>E</SUB> ⋅ <FENCE>1 + <IT>y</IT> ⋅ cos <FENCE><FR><NU>&pgr;</NU><DE>2</DE></FR> &agr;</FENCE></FENCE></NU><DE>1 + 2 ⋅ <IT>y</IT> ⋅ cos <FENCE><FR><NU>&pgr;</NU><DE>2</DE></FR> &agr;</FENCE> + <IT>y</IT><SUP>2</SUP></DE></FR></FENCE> (3)
and
X<SUB>S</SUB> = − <FR><NU>R<SUB>E</SUB></NU><DE>R<SUB>E</SUB> + R<SUB>I</SUB></DE></FR> ⋅ <FR><NU>R<SUB>E</SUB> ⋅ <IT>y</IT> ⋅ sin <FENCE><FR><NU>&pgr;</NU><DE>2</DE></FR> &agr;</FENCE></NU><DE>1 + 2 ⋅ <IT>y</IT> ⋅ cos <FENCE><FR><NU>&pgr;</NU><DE>2</DE></FR> &agr;</FENCE> + <IT>y</IT><SUP>2</SUP></DE></FR> (4)
where
<IT>y</IT> = [&ohgr; ⋅ <IT>C</IT><SUB>m</SUB> ⋅ (R<SUB>E</SUB> + R<SUB>I</SUB>)]<SUP>&agr;</SUP> (5)
Now let RP and XP be parallel resistance and reactance of the impedance, respectively; i.e.
Z = <FR><NU><IT>j</IT> ⋅ R<SUB>P</SUB> ⋅ X<SUB>P</SUB></NU><DE>R<SUB>P</SUB> + <IT>j</IT> ⋅ X<SUB>P</SUB></DE></FR> (6)
We can obtain the relationships between series and parallel resistance and reactance from Eqs. 2 and 6
R<SUB>P</SUB> = R<SUB>S</SUB> + <FR><NU>X<SUP>2</SUP><SUB>S</SUB></NU><DE>R<SUB>S</SUB></DE></FR> (7)
X<SUB>P</SUB> = X<SUB>S</SUB> + <FR><NU>R<SUP>2</SUP><SUB>S</SUB></NU><DE>X<SUB>S</SUB></DE></FR> (8)
Finally, by replacing RS and XS in Eqs. 7 and 8 with Eqs. 3 and 4, we have the following equations for RP and XP

R<SUB>P</SUB> = <FR><NU>R<SUB>E</SUB></NU><DE>R<SUB>E</SUB> + R<SUB>I</SUB></DE></FR> ⋅ <FENCE>R<SUB>I</SUB> + <FR><NU>R<SUB>E</SUB> ⋅ <FENCE>1 + <IT>y</IT> ⋅ cos <FENCE><FR><NU>&pgr;</NU><DE>2</DE></FR> &agr;</FENCE></FENCE></NU><DE>1 + 2 ⋅ <IT>y</IT> ⋅ cos <FENCE><FR><NU>&pgr;</NU><DE>2</DE></FR> &agr;</FENCE> + <IT>y</IT><SUP>2</SUP></DE></FR></FENCE> (9)
<FENCE> + <FR><NU><FENCE>R<SUB>E</SUB> ⋅ <IT>y</IT> ⋅ sin <FENCE><FR><NU>&pgr;</NU><DE>2</DE></FR> &agr;</FENCE></FENCE><SUP>2</SUP></NU><DE><FENCE>1 + 2 ⋅ <IT>y</IT> ⋅ cos <FENCE><FR><NU>&pgr;</NU><DE>2</DE></FR> &agr;</FENCE> + <IT>y</IT><SUP>2</SUP></FENCE> <FENCE>R<SUB>I</SUB> ⋅ <FENCE>1 + 2 ⋅ <IT>y</IT> ⋅ cos <FENCE><FR><NU>&pgr;</NU><DE>2</DE></FR> &agr;</FENCE> + <IT>y</IT><SUP>2</SUP></FENCE> + R<SUB>E</SUB> ⋅ <FENCE>1 + <IT>y</IT> ⋅ cos <FENCE><FR><NU>&pgr;</NU><DE>2</DE></FR> &agr;</FENCE> </FENCE> </FENCE></DE></FR></FENCE>
X<SUB>P</SUB> = − <FR><NU>R<SUB>E</SUB></NU><DE>R<SUB>E</SUB> + R<SUB>I</SUB></DE></FR> ⋅ <FENCE><FR><NU>R<SUB>E</SUB> ⋅ <IT>y</IT> ⋅ sin <FENCE><FR><NU>&pgr;</NU><DE>2</DE></FR> &agr;</FENCE></NU><DE>1 + 2 ⋅ <IT>y</IT> ⋅ cos <FENCE><FR><NU>&pgr;</NU><DE>2</DE></FR> &agr;</FENCE> + <IT>y</IT><SUP>2</SUP></DE></FR></FENCE> (10)
<FENCE> + <FR><NU><FENCE>R<SUB>I</SUB> ⋅ <FENCE>1 + 2 ⋅ <IT>y</IT> ⋅ cos <FENCE><FR><NU>&pgr;</NU><DE>2</DE></FR> &agr;</FENCE> + <IT>y</IT><SUP>2</SUP></FENCE> + R<SUB>E</SUB> <FENCE>1 + <IT>y</IT> ⋅ cos <FENCE><FR><NU>&pgr;</NU><DE>2</DE></FR> &agr;</FENCE> </FENCE> </FENCE><SUP>2</SUP></NU><DE><FENCE>1 + 2 ⋅ <IT>y</IT> ⋅ cos <FENCE><FR><NU>&pgr;</NU><DE>2</DE></FR> &agr;</FENCE> + <IT>y</IT><SUP>2</SUP></FENCE> ⋅ R<SUB>E</SUB> ⋅ <IT>y</IT> ⋅ sin <FENCE><FR><NU>&pgr;</NU><DE>2</DE></FR> &agr;</FENCE></DE></FR></FENCE>

The results were then divided by the nominal value to express the result uniformly as a ratio. Then the XP ratio change was plotted vs. the change in ratio for RE, RI, Cm, and alpha .

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The physical characteristics of the cardiac surgery patients, as well as their dilution-determined ECW, ICW, and TBW volumes, are shown in Table 1. Table 2 displays their Cole modeling results. The impedance data measured on the eight male cardiac surgery patients corresponded extremely well to the Cole model. The results of Cole modeling computed at five different time points before and after cardiac surgery are shown in Table 3. RE and RI are not simply related to volume (4). However, these data suggest that the infusion of fluid affected both the ECW and ICW, since both RE and RI changed. The infused fluid resulted in a decrease in RE and RI and a concurrent increase in fc.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Descriptive characteristics of cardiac surgery patients

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.   Cole modeling results of data used to predict cardiac patients' 2H2O (TBW) and NaBr (ECW) spaces

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3.   Cole modeling results of data measured at five time points on patients before and after cardiac surgery

As shown in Table 4, for the cardiac surgery patients, single-frequency impedance predicted TBW well, with little mean difference compared with dilution. The correlation between single-frequency impedance and dilution ECW was reasonable, but the SEE was quite high, and there was a mean difference of 1.7 liters (Table 4). For single-frequency ICW, which was determined by subtracting the predicted ECW from the predicted TBW, both the correlation and SEE values were poor, and the mean difference was large (Table 4).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4.   Prediction of cardiac surgery patients' 2H2O (TBW), NaBr (ECW), and 2H2O-NaBr (ICW) spaces by use of single-frequency impedance and BIS approach with use of different apparent ECW and ICW resistivity constants

Except for mean difference, the BIS prediction of the cardiac surgery patients' dilution ECW, ICW, and TBW volumes was good for all three sets of resistivity constants (Table 4). For ECW the correlation and SEE values were the same for each constant (Table 4). For ICW, correlation and SEE varied slightly. This establishes that ECW resistivity, as used in our mixture-volume equation, is purely a scalar term, having no effect on correlation or SEE. ICW resistivity is effectively a scalar, since the nonlinearity was slight (Table 4). Most noticeable about Table 4 is that the use of different resistivity constants dramatically changed the mean difference between the BIS- and dilution-determined volumes. The variation in scaling caused by the dilution method equally affects the single-frequency method. These results are considered further in the DISCUSSION.

For the cardiac surgery patients, the strongest prediction of dilution ICW with XP was achieved by using Kotler's base exponential equation at all frequencies (14) (Table 5). Similar predictions of dilution ICW were discovered at all the measured frequencies. Most interesting was that the best prediction produced by XP was not at 49 kHz but at 204 kHz. As shown in Table 6, the prediction of dilution ICW with use of resistance alone, which is in the XP equation, was strong. XP also predicted dilution ECW and TBW with high correlation and reasonable SEE values at all frequencies measured (Table 7). The descriptive characteristics of the 48 healthy Italian men used to further analyze the XP model are shown in Table 8; their Cole modeling results are shown in Table 9. As found with the cardiac surgery patients, similar predictions of TBK were produced by XP at all frequencies (Table 10). XP computed at 50 kHz again did not provide the best prediction of TBK. The best prediction was provided by XP at 10 kHz, which is different by a factor of 20 from that which predicted best for the cardiac surgery patients (Table 5). The TBK predicted by resistance alone was almost as good as that predicted by the inclusion of reactance (Table 11).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5.   Prediction of cardiac patients' 2H2O-NaBr space (ICW) by use of base exponential Xp equation of Kotler et al. (14) at various frequencies

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6.   Prediction of cardiac patients' 2H2O-NaBr space (ICW) by use of Ht2/resistance at various frequencies

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 7.   Prediction of cardiac patients' dilution NaBr (ECW) and 2H2O (TBW) spaces by use of exponential XP prediction equation of Kotler et al. (14) at various frequencies

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 8.   Descriptive characteristics of healthy Italian men

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 9.   Cole modeling results of data used to predict TBK-determined ICW for healthy Italian men

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 10.   Prediction of TBK-determined ICW by use of base exponential XP equation of Kotler et al. (14) at various frequencies in healthy Italian men

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 11.   Prediction of TBK-determined ICW by use of Ht2/resistance at various frequencies in healthy Italian men

The descriptive characteristics of the hemodialysis patients are shown in Table 12; their Cole modeling results before and after hemodialysis are shown in Table 13. As found with the cardiac surgery patients and healthy Italian men, the measured impedance data fit the Cole model well. Opposite to the results after infusion of fluid (Table 3), RE increased rather than decreased with ultrafiltration (Table 13). RI remained relatively stable, suggesting that most of the fluid was removed from the ECW. Cm changed considerably, and alpha  remained significantly lower than that found for healthy subjects (Table 9). The effect Cole model term alpha  is believed to represent a distribution of time constants caused by different cell sizes and shapes (3). If this is the case, a decrease in alpha  would suggest a widening in cell size and shape. The fc, rather than increasing, as when fluid was infused, decreased when fluid was removed (Table 13).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 12.   Descriptive characteristics of hemodialysis patients

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 13.   Cole modeling results before and after hemodialysis

The results of the mathematical modeling revealed virtually no change in XP at 50 kHz with a ±20% change in RE and a change of only ~2% at the extremes of frequency (Fig. 4). A ±20% change in RI caused an ~15% change in XP at 50 kHz and a very large change (e.g., ~30%) at 1 MHz (Fig. 5). A ±20% change in Cm caused an ~4% change in XP at 50 kHz, and the effect was slightly nonlinear. At 1 MHz the effect of a ±20% change in Cm resulted in an ~12% change in XP (Fig. 6). A ±20% change in alpha  (from 0.56 to 0.84, ±20% from the nominal value of 0.7; Table 9) caused an ~26% change in XP at 50 kHz, and the result was quite nonlinear. The second largest effect on XP was caused by a change in alpha  at 1 MHz (Fig. 7).


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Effect of a ±20% change in RE on parallel reactance (XP).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Effect of a ±20% change in RI on XP.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Effect of a ±20% change in Cm on XP.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Effect of a ±20% change in Cole model term exponent alpha  on XP.

The frequency-resistance plot (Fig. 8) suggests that at frequencies low enough to ensure that the measurement is solely dependent on ECW (below a few hundred hertz), the effects of a different phenomenon (alpha -dispersion) have become significant (4, 31). The resistance measured at the common 50-kHz frequency (2, 18, 33) was only partially conducting through the ICW; thus it is clearly dependent on both ECW and fc. This also confirms the criticism that 50-kHz measurements of TBW are dependent on high ECW-TBW intercorrelation (40). It is well known that ECW and ICW are not fully measured until >10 MHz (4, 31). This is supported by in vivo data (Fig. 1). Even if it were technically feasible to measure to such high frequencies, the influence of another unwanted phenomenon (gamma -dispersion) would still need to be removed. To predict TBW with any single frequency requires the use of a TBW resistivity term and the assumption that it is fixed. The resistivity of ECW is different from the resistivity of ICW by a factor of 3-4 (4, 9); thus the sensitivity of a single high-frequency measurement to changes in ECW and ICW is different. A simple change in the ECW-to-ICW ratio will significantly alter TBW resistivity and cause error, even when ion concentration has not changed. This error can be removed by solving for Cole model terms RE and RI and determining independent resistivities for the ECW and ICW, respectively. From both theoretical (Fig. 8) and measured data (Fig. 1), it can be readily demonstrated that at any single frequency the amount of ECW and ICW conduction varies not only between subjects but when fc changes. A change in RE, RI, or Cm can cause a change in fc. When fc changes, the amount of conduction through the ECW and ICW at any fixed frequency changes. Because fc decreases when fluid is removed through ultrafiltration, it was not surprising that, between pre- and postdialysis, impedance at the low-frequency limit (i.e., R0) changed 18.9% more than at 5 kHz (Table 14). Nor was it surprising that impedance changed 9.2% less at the high-frequency limit (i.e., Rinfinity ) than at 500 kHz (Table 14). Also not unexpected, impedance was greater at R0 than at 5 kHz and less at Rinfinity than at 500 kHz. These findings are considered more thoroughly in the DISCUSSION.


View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Effect of changing alpha  from 0.63 to 1, adding 5 liters of intracellular water (ICW), adding 5 liters of extracellular water (ECW), and changing fc from 40 to 100 kHz on resistance.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 14.   Change in resistance before to after hemodialysis at R0, 5 kHz, Rinfinity , and 500 kHz

The frequency-reactance plot (Fig. 9) suggests that reactance is sensitive to all body composition parameters in the frequency range around fc and is sensitive to the other dispersions (i.e., alpha  and gamma ) for frequencies significantly different from fc. This indicates a tenuous relationship between reactance at any single frequency and any single body composition parameter, with any apparent relationship being accentuated by the high correlation between parameters (40). Furthermore, the sensitivity of reactance is extremely dependent on the relationship between the frequency of measurement and fc and is symmetrical about fc. Phase is a function of the ratio of resistance to reactance [arctan(reactance/resistance)]; thus it is sensitive to all the problems associated with both single-frequency resistance and reactance.


View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Effect of changing alpha  from 0.63 to 1, adding 5 liters of ICW, adding 5 liters of ECW, and changing fc from 40 to 100 kHz on reactance.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

In review of Figs. 1, 8, and 9, the debate concerning the best single- or dual-frequency impedance to use for measuring ECW and ICW appears irrelevant (5, 15). Apart from the error caused by not accounting for the different ECW and ICW resistivities, the proportion of current conducting through the ICW at any single frequency varies. This is supported by the hemodialysis results (Table 14). The change in impedance before and after hemodialysis at R0 was 18.9% greater than that at 5 kHz. With a decreased fc after dialysis (Table 13), conduction through the ICW at 5 kHz would be greater after than before dialysis. More ICW conduction would alter the impedance, because an increased volume (i.e., ICW) is being measured, making the measurement less sensitive to changes in ECW. Similarly, because ultrafiltration principally affects the ECW, one would expect the impedance to change less at Rinfinity than that at R0, because both ECW and ICW are being measured. As also shown in Table 14, between pre- and postdialysis the impedance changed 9.2% more at 500 kHz than at Rinfinity . Inasmuch as fc decreases after dialysis (Table 13), there is more conduction through the ICW at 500 kHz than before dialysis. By use of curve fitting to determine the impedance at R0 and Rinfinity , the measurement becomes independent of fc, and error caused by the change in fc is effectively removed (Fig. 2). Although RI can be computed by the impedance measured at other frequencies, the error in calculating RI can be as high as 200% by not using Rinfinity (13).

The previous conclusion that single-frequency impedance and BIS methods provide similar ECW information appears tenuous. A 50-kHz resistance had been used to predict TBW and fat-free mass, then the predicted fat-free mass and reactance were used to predict ECW (28). There is little relationship between reactance and ECW (32); thus, one datum (i.e., resistance at 50 kHz) should not be used to predict two variables. This is not intended as criticism, for such statistical reasoning is widespread, but rather an example of how a statistical equation that has no scientific basis can produce misleading results (33). The lack of scientific reasoning and reliance on statistical methods, despite high intercorrelation between variables (40), has caused a great deal of confusion in the field.

The finding that the ECW and ICW resistivities are scalar or multiplicative terms was replicated in this study (4, 22, 39) (Table 4). Different dilution methods (e. g., sodium bromide vs. sulfate) produce significantly different-sized ECW and TBW spaces (7). It is now believed that the size of the space measured by dilution varies for even the same methods when different protocols and analysis techniques are used (4, 39). This is further supported by this study, since both deuterium and sodium bromide were used (Table 4). Had Patel et al. (28) previously used the resistivity constants computed by De Lorenzo (4) rather than those by Van Loan et al. (38), the mean TBW difference would have been very small, but then the mean difference for ECW would have been large (Table 4). Because each of these studies used deuterium and sodium bromide, it is difficult to determine which scaling is physiologically correct.

Several findings emerge from this reassessment of the dilution results on the cardiac surgery patients. The measured impedance spectral data corresponded well to the Cole model (Table 2), and the impedance spectroscopy approach provided a better prediction of ECW and ICW than did single-frequency impedance (Table 4). The single-frequency TBW result may appear adequate, but resistance at 50 kHz is a tenuous prediction of TBW, because, as shown in Figs. 1 and 8, only a portion of the ICW is measured at this frequency. Thus any 50-kHz prediction of TBW would rely on high intercorrelation between ECW and TBW. The further a subject's ECW and ICW volume deviated from the sample used to regress the equation, the less precise the prediction would become. This must be so, because the ECW and ICW resistivities are different by a factor of 3-4 (3, 9), and fc can change when any tissue variable changes (Fig. 9). ECW can also be predicted by a 50-kHz impedance by forcing a fit to an equation. That such an approach is simply forcing an equation to fit the data, rather than a measurement, is evidenced by the poor prediction of ICW (i.e., predicted TBW - predicted ECW) shown in Table 4. On the other hand, similar predictions were obtained for ECW, ICW, and TBW when the BIS approach was used (Table 4).

We previously stated that reactance can only be associated with Cm, because ICW is a resistive, not a reactive, medium (4). This is true, but the results of mathematical modeling revealed that XP is strongly influenced by RI (Fig. 5). The Cole model predicts that it will be. The problem is that XP is also highly sensitive to changes in Cm and alpha  (Figs. 6 and 7). Although Cm and alpha  are considerably decreased in the cardiac surgery patients (~16 and 14%, respectively; Table 2) compared with healthy men (Table 9), Cm and alpha  change dramatically in theory (Fig. 9) and in practice (Tables 3 and 13). Bestoso and Mehta (1) observed a mean 50% increase in Cm after fluid and solute removal by hemodialysis. We have discovered Cm to be considerably decreased in clinical populations (Tables 3 and 13) compared with healthy subjects (Table 9) and on the individual level as much as 75% (Table 15). The exponent alpha  was observed to be extremely decreased (i.e., 0.45) in severely depleted patients compared with healthy subjects (i.e., 0.7; unpublished observations). This study also discovered that alpha  is lower in clinical populations (Tables 3 and 13) and is considerably lower on the individual level (Table 15).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 15.   Cole modeling results of data measured on one patient before and after hemodialysis

Variation in Cm and alpha  was less in patients who had fluid infused (Tables 3 and 16) than in those who had fluid removed through ultrafiltration (Tables 13 and 15). We suspect this is due to chemical changes that occur during hemodialysis. That Cm increases with fluid removal and decreases with overhydration is very interesting. Theoretically, Cm changes only when there is a change in the thickness of the cell membrane (10). What is interesting about Figs. 10 and 11 is that on recovery (time 5) the frequency response approaches that of patients before cardiac surgery (time 1). Most noticeable about Figs. 12 and 13 is the higher fc for this dialysis patient than for healthy subjects (Table 9) and its change from 124 kHz before to 71 kHz after dialysis (Table 15). It can be seen in Fig. 10 that the data follow the common S curve that is easily fit. However, in Fig. 12 the curvature is less discernible. We previously reported (4) that modeling with both impedance and phase is essential, because phase has a much broader range of sensitivity to change than impedance (Figs. 11 and 13). Deurenberg et al. (5) stated that fitting the model with impedance alone is adequate. However, with the data shown in Fig. 12, the results of modeling by use of impedance alone would be far less precise, because there would be no discernible curve to follow without phase (19).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 16.   Cole modeling results of data measured at five time points on one patient before and after cardiac surgery


View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Frequency vs. resistance measured on 1 patient at 5 time points before and after cardiac surgery. R0 and Rinfinity are represented as 0.001 Hz and 100,000 MHz, respectively. R0 and Rinfinity were derived from modeling.


View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11.   Frequency vs. reactance measured on 1 patient at 5 time points before and after cardiac surgery. R0 and Rinfinity are represented as 0.001 Hz and 100,000 MHz, respectively. Reactance at R0 and Rinfinity were set at zero.


View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 12.   Frequency vs. resistance measured on 1 patient before and after hemodialysis. R0 and Rinfinity are represented as 0.001 Hz and 100,000 MHz, respectively. R0 and Rinfinity were derived from modeling.


View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 13.   Frequency vs. reactance measured on 1 patient before and after hemodialysis. R0 and Rinfinity are represented as 0.001 Hz and 100,000 MHz, respectively. Reactance at R0 and Rinfinity were set at zero.

Similar to a single-frequency resistance-predicted ECW or TBW, an XP-predicted ICW is dependent on the elements in the tissue having relative uniformity. The mathematical modeling revealed that XP as presented previously (14, 15) is merely a simplification of the Cole model. Van Marken Lichtenbelt et al. (40) and others discovered that resistance at any frequency predicts ECW, ICW, and TBW with virtually equal precision. We have found that XP also predicts ICW, ECW, and TBW with equal precision at any frequency measured (Tables 5, 7, and 10). The best prediction of ICW with XP was not even produced by the proposed 49-50 kHz (14, 15) and was sample dependent. Furthermore, RS alone provided similar predictions (Tables 6 and 11). From the name of this new theory, "parallel reactance," it would seem that reactance should be providing most if not all the prediction, but the opposite is the case. The correlation and percent SEE values reported by Kotler et al. (14) for the XP-predicted BCM were only 0.04 and 1.1% better, respectively, than those using RS alone. The same resistance was also used to predict TBW (14). Lukaski (15), who is promoting an XP BCM prediction, previously promoted reactance as a measure of ECW (16), but confusingly it was reported to be invalid by Kotler's laboratory, because reactance was contributing virtually nothing to the prediction (32).

No theoretical basis for predicting BCM with XP has been reported (14), and the statement was made that "a major uncertainty in the theory underlying BIA [bioelectrical impedance analysis] whether the body's ionic circuit is arranged as a series or parallel circuit" (14). This statement should have been accompanied by a reference. It was suggested that the improved correlation between XP and BCM was proof that XP was superior to XS for predicting BCM (14). It is true that impedance measured at any single frequency can be interpreted as a series or parallel circuit, with both resulting in two final elements (resistance and reactance). The problem is that biological tissue consists of more than two elements. No reference was given, because there is no rigorous biophysical research to support this claim or a single-frequency prediction of cell volume. Single biological cells have been interpreted in biophysics since 1925 as a three-element model, with an RE in parallel with a series Cm and RI (8). Cole (3) added an