|
|
||||||||
Vol. 84, Issue 4, 1425-1430, April 1998
1 Department of Physiological
Science and 2 Brain Research
Institute, There are forms of growth hormone (GH) in the
plasma and pituitary of the rat and in the plasma of humans that are
undetected by presently available immunoassays (iGH) but can be
measured by bioassay (bGH). Although the regulation of iGH
release is well documented, the mechanism(s) of bGH release is unclear.
On the basis of changes in bGH and iGH secretion in rats that had been exposed to microgravity conditions, we hypothesized that neural afferents play a role in regulating the release of these hormones. To
examine whether bGH secretion can be modulated by afferent input from
skeletal muscle, the proximal or distal ends of severed hindlimb fast
muscle nerves were stimulated (~2 times threshold) in anesthetized
rats. Plasma bGH increased ~250%, and pituitary bGH decreased
~60% after proximal nerve trunk stimulation. The bGH response was
independent of muscle mass or whether the muscles were flexors or
extensors. Distal nerve stimulation had little or no effect on plasma
or pituitary bGH. Plasma iGH concentrations were unchanged after
proximal nerve stimulation. Although there may be multiple regulatory
mechanisms of bGH, the present results demonstrate that the activation
of low-threshold afferents from fast skeletal muscles can play a
regulatory role in the release of bGH, but not iGH, from the pituitary
in anesthetized rats.
immunoassay; bioassay; proprioception; electrical stimulation; peripheral nerves; low-threshold afferents
GROWTH HORMONE (GH) is the most abundant hormone in the
anterior pituitary gland of nonlactating mammals (18) and consists of a
family of >100 molecular forms that vary in size and possibly function (2-4, 28). Variants of GH range from fragments as small
as 5 kDa to large-molecular-weight forms ("big" and "big big" GH) which can be >100 kDa in size (3, 4, 18, 28). The 22-kDa
product of the GH-N gene is the GH most commonly measured by
immunoassay, and it is the form made by recombinant DNA technologies and used therapeutically for a variety of growth-related disorders. However, the degree of interaction between 22-kDa GH antibodies and GH
variants or GH molecules bound to their binding proteins is largely
unknown, and the likelihood is low that these antibodies consistently
recognize large-molecular-weight GH forms.
It appears that the smaller GH variants are fragments of 22-kDa GH, or
of a 20-kDa GH molecule that is alternatively spliced from the GH-N
gene through the removal of part of exon 3 (2, 3), and that they result
from proteolytic cleavage. However, the origin of
large-molecular-weight variants of GH is less well understood.
Posttranslational modification of the GH molecule, through
glycosylation, complexing of GH (20 or 22 kDa) with binding proteins,
or dimerization or oligomerization of smaller GH molecules, has been
identified as one possible source (2-4).
The regulation of 22-kDa GH is mediated by hypothalamic GH-releasing
hormone and somatostatin, and its physiology has been well
characterized. In contrast, the physiological effects and regulatory
mechanisms of large-molecular-weight variants of GH are less well
understood. In the present study, we use changes in tibial epiphyseal
width in hypophysectomized rats as an in vivo bioassay to measure GH
activity (13). These bioassayable GH (bGH) activity levels measured in
rat plasma and pituitary tissue, as well as in human and bovine
plasma, are largely independent of the levels of GH as measured by
immunoassay (iGH) (9-11, 13, 17-19).
Secretion of bGH by pituitary cells cultured from rats exposed to
spaceflight or by rat pituitary cells flown in space in culture is
consistently decreased (~50%), whereas the iGH response is variable
(17-19). These changes in bGH occur in the presence of normal
levels of plasma metabolites that are thought to regulate iGH
secretion. We hypothesized that, because proprioceptive feedback and
sensory neurons are markedly disrupted after spaceflight (8, 21, 24),
proprioceptive input may play a role in the regulation of bGH release.
The purpose of the present study, therefore, was to determine whether
bGH release from the pituitary could be regulated by afferent input
from the hindlimb musculature. We found that bGH, but not iGH, was
released from the rat pituitary when low-threshold afferents in the
proximal end of severed nerves from fast muscle were stimulated.
Experimental animals.
Male albino rats (~200 g body wt; Taconic Sprague Dawley, Germantown,
NY) were housed in shoebox cages (2-3 rats/cage) in a room
maintained at 25 ± 1°C on a reversed 12:12-h light-dark cycle.
They were given food (standard Purina rat chow) and water ad libitum.
Rats were weighed ~24 h after their arrival, and they were allowed to
acclimatize after shipment for at least 1 wk before experimentation.
Animal care and use were in accordance with the Guidelines of the
National Institutes of Health and were approved by the Institutional
Animal Care and Use Committee.
Stimulation protocol.
Peripheral nerves in the hindlimbs (sciatic, tibial, peroneal,
and/or sural nerves) were surgically isolated and severed in rats that were deeply anesthetized (pentobarbital sodium, 50 mg/kg ip;
n = 3-10/group). The proximal or
distal nerve trunk was placed on a bipolar silver electrode and was
stimulated in situ with a 20-µs square-wave pulse for 15 min at a
train frequency simulating electromyographic patterns recorded from
rats running on a treadmill at 40 m/min (100 Hz, 150 ms on:150 ms off)
(25). The strength of the current was two times the threshold
required to elicit a visible reflex response. In a
separate experiment, the threshold level was tested further by
recording the compound action potentials when antidromically
stimulating the tibial nerve and recording proximally from the sciatic
nerve. This current strength was sufficient to excite group I and some
group II axons (i.e., afferents from Golgi tendon organs and primary
and secondary endings of muscle spindles). The level of stimulation was
well below that which excites group III and IV afferents, i.e., more
than five times threshold. Control rats were prepared identically, but
they were not stimulated. Blood and pituitary glands were collected
immediately after the 15-min period and were handled as described
below.
Sample collection.
All rats were bled by cardiac puncture, with heparin used as an
anticoagulant. Animals were then decapitated. After the blood was
centrifuged (1,500 g, 30 min,
4°C), aliquots of plasma from each rat were drawn off and stored,
with sodium fluoride as a preservative, in cryovials at GH assays.
iGH was measured by using a variation of the double antibody procedure
of Schalch and Reichlin (26). The rat GH (VII-38-C; 3 U/mg) that was
used for standards and radioiodination with
125I and the polyclonal antiserum
were produced in house. Monkey anti-rat GH (V-30-G1) was used as the
primary antibody at a 1:250,000 final dilution. The secondary antibody
was a goat anti-monkey gamma globulin (Antibodies, Davis, CA; 1:20).
Intra- and interassay coefficients of variation were 3.8 and 6.3%,
respectively.
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
70°C
for immunoassay of hormones and measurement of metabolites. Measurement
of iGH was performed as described below, whereas other plasma hormones
were immunoassayed by using commercially available kits. Testosterone,
thyroxine, and triiodothyronine were measured by solid-phase
immunoassay (Diagnostic Products, Los Angeles, CA); corticosterone was
measured by double-antibody immunoassay (ICN Biomedicals, Costa Mesa,
CA). Inter- and intra-assay coefficients of variation were <10% for all kit immunoassays. Plasma metabolites (glucose, lactate, and triglycerides) were measured by using a COBAS automated
analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Montclair, NJ). The remainder of the
plasma was pooled by treatment group and stored at
70°C
until used for measurement of bGH. Anterior pituitary glands were
cleanly dissected, pooled by group, and frozen at
70°C until
used. The glands were thawed, weighed, homogenized in a small volume of
0.01 M
Na2CO3 by using an all-glass hand homogenizer, diluted for bioassay with 0.85% NaCl, and measured for bGH concentrations.
1 · day
1
for 4 days) of plasma or pituitary homogenates pooled by group from
experimental animals were injected intraperitoneally into female rats
hypophysectomized at 26 days of age (4 rats/dose, 2 doses/pituitary
sample, 1 dose/plasma sample). Injections began 2 wk after
hypophysectomy. Pooling of plasma and pituitary samples from
experimental rats was necessary to obtain sufficient injection volumes
for this assay. Rats were killed by
CO2 overdose, and the left tibia
was dissected, split longitudinally, and stained with
AgNO3 to allow visualization of
the proximal growth plate. An ocular micrometer that was mounted on a
light microscope was used to make 10 measurements across each
epiphysis; the measurements were averaged for each rat. Then group
averages were calculated and compared with a standard curve generated
by injections of a GH reference standard (bovine GH XIV-44-C5; 1.5 U/mg; 0-, 5-, 15-, and 45-µg total doses) purified from bovine
pituitary extracts. bGH data are expressed in terms of rat GH (3.0 U/mg).
Statistical methods.
Statistical analyses of plasma hormone and metabolite measurements
other than bGH were done by using a one-way analysis of variance to
determine overall differences, followed by a Tukey-Kramer post hoc test
to determine group differences (SuperAnova; Abacus Concepts, Berkeley,
CA). Power calculations for statistics run on experimental groups of
all n sizes yielded values
80%.
Pituitary bGH measurements (2 dose levels) were determined by using a
four-point assay procedure, whereas the plasma bGH measurements (1 dose
level) were determined by using a bracketed three-point assay method (27). Differences in bGH concentrations between groups were determined
by Student's t-test. Significance was
determined at the P
0.05 level for
all statistical analyses.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Tibial, peroneal, and sciatic nerve stimulation. Stimulation of the proximal end of the severed tibial nerve, innervating predominantly fast ankle extensors, increased plasma bGH concentrations by 254% while decreasing pituitary bGH by 57% (Fig. 1A). Plasma iGH levels, on the other hand, were unchanged after stimulation of the proximal end of the tibial nerve (Fig. 1B). These data demonstrate that bGH, but not iGH, secretion can be modulated by afferent input from the hindlimb musculature. Similar changes were found after 5 or 10 min of stimulation (data not shown), emphasizing the rapidity of the bGH response to muscle afferent activation. In a separate experiment, the proximal end of the severed tibial nerve was stimulated in hypophysectomized and normal (pituitary intact) rats. This stimulation increased plasma bGH by ~100% in normal rats; bGH was undetectable in the plasma of both stimulated and unstimulated hypophysectomized rats (data not shown). Stimulation of the proximal end of the severed peroneal nerve, innervating primarily fast ankle flexors, gave a response similar to stimulation of the proximal end of the tibial nerve. Plasma bGH increased by 210% and pituitary bGH decreased by 66% (Fig. 2A), with no significant effect on plasma iGH (Fig. 2B). Furthermore, simultaneous stimulation of the proximal ends of the peroneal + tibial + sural or tibial + sural nerves increased plasma and decreased pituitary bGH by ~250 and ~70%, respectively, a response similar to proximal stimulation of either the tibial nerve or peroneal nerve alone (Fig. 3A). Again, plasma iGH was unchanged from control levels (Fig. 3B). The response to stimulation of the proximal end of the sciatic nerve, innervating the entire lower hindlimb, approximated the results seen when the proximal tibial and/or peroneal nerves were stimulated (data not shown).
|
|
|
Sural and distal nerve stimulation. Stimulation of the proximal end of the severed sural nerve, a largely cutaneous nerve, had no effect on plasma or pituitary bGH (Fig. 1A) or plasma iGH (Fig. 1B) levels. Stimulation of the distal end of the sural, tibial, or peroneal nerve did not affect plasma bGH levels, but increases in pituitary bGH of 23 and 26% were seen with distal sural and peroneal nerve stimulation, respectively (Fig. 4A). Although these increases were significant compared with the experimental control, the pituitary bGH values for distal sural or peroneal nerve stimulation did not exceed the range [31.6 ± 4.9 (mean ± SD)] of control pituitary bGH values calculated across experiments. Furthermore, while none of the sural or distal nerve stimulations fell outside this range, all proximal stimulation values were well beyond these limits. Plasma iGH concentrations were not different from control levels after any of these distal nerve stimulation paradigms (Figs. 1B and 4B). However, plasma iGH levels were increased 139% after stimulation of the distal ends of the peroneal + tibial + sural nerves together (Fig. 3B). This may reflect the relatively large muscle mass stimulated, which could have induced an iGH response via metabolic mechanisms.
|
Other plasma hormones and metabolites. Table 1 shows plasma triiodothyronine, thyroxine, testosterone, corticosterone, glucose, lactate, and triglyceride concentrations after proximal or distal stimulation of the sural, tibial, or peroneal nerve. The levels of these hormones and metabolites were within normal ranges in control animals and showed no changes after any of the stimulation paradigms. These data indicate that there were no metabolic perturbations in these animals. Plasma corticosterone concentrations were higher than would be expected in normal rats of the age and weight used in these experiments, likely because of the anesthetic and surgery.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Source and type of afferents that can regulate bGH. The present data demonstrate that low-threshold afferent input from activated fast hindlimb skeletal muscles can regulate the release of bGH, but not iGH, from the rat pituitary. Stimulation of the proximal end of the severed sural nerve had no effect on plasma or pituitary bGH, indicating that bGH secretion is not regulated by cutaneous afferent input. The stimulation level in the present experiments was sufficient to excite low-threshold group I and some group II afferent fibers that originate from muscle spindles and Golgi tendon organs, thus providing strong evidence of a proprioceptive mechanism for regulation of bGH, but not iGH, release. Furthermore, these experiments indicate that the mechanism for eliciting bGH secretion is similar in fast (e.g., flexor or extensor) muscles and that the amount of fast-muscle mass associated with the stimulated nerve (i.e., number of low-threshold receptors activated) had no effect on the magnitude of the bGH response to stimulation.
Evidence that bGH is of pituitary origin. Several studies provide evidence that bGH is of pituitary origin. First, bGH concentrations are approximately fourfold higher in jugular than in cardiac plasma, and stimulation by insulin further increases jugular, but not cardiac, plasma bGH (10). Second, bGH is present in anterior pituitary extracts and has been measured in both the granular and cytosolic fractions of pituitary somatotrophs (11). Third, bGH is secreted by anterior pituitary cells in culture, and, more specifically, is released from cultures enriched in somatotrophs (19). Fourth, bGH is undetectable in the plasma of hypophysectomized rats (see Ref. 9 and present results). Finally, bGH concentrations are inversely related in pituitary and plasma samples from proximal tibial, peroneal, and/or sural nerve-stimulated rats (Figs. 1-3A). To further address the question as to whether elevated blood bGH concentrations after proximal nerve stimulation were due to secretion from the pituitary, we estimated the expected increase in the blood, assuming a blood volume of 7% of body weight and an approximate bGH half-life of ~10 min (unpublished observations). Our estimations are consistent with the interpretation that the increase in bGH in the plasma can be accounted for by the observed decrease in pituitary bGH.
Differences between bGH and iGH. Several lines of evidence demonstrate that the tibial growth, as used in the present bioassay, is not a measure of iGH. First, tibial growth was not inhibited by systemic administration of antibodies engendered to 22-kDa pituitary GH, the antibodies used to measure iGH; this indicates that the influence of 22-kDa GH on the bioassay is minimal (9, 11, 15). Second, basal levels of plasma iGH in the rat are ~10 ng/ml whereas basal bGH levels are equivalent to 500-1,000 ng/ml of iGH (11). We also demonstrated basal plasma iGH values of ~10 ng/ml, but it is interesting to note that the basal plasma bGH levels reported in this manuscript are ~2,000 ng/ml. The reason for the higher basal bGH levels in the present series of experiments is unclear, but it could be related to the anesthetic state and type of anesthesia. In the former study (11), the rats were lightly anesthetized with ether for a brief period; however, in the present experiments, rats were deeply anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium for ~30 min. Third, insulin-induced hypoglycemia, fasting, or exposure to cold reduce pituitary bGH content in rats by as much as 65% while increasing plasma bGH, but the same conditions do not change pituitary or plasma iGH concentrations (9, 10). Finally, other differences in responses of iGH and bGH to spaceflight are noted in the introduction (see Refs. 17-19).
Assay sensitivity and specificity. Our bioassay and immunoassay have different sensitivities and different endpoints. The bioassay has a sensitivity of 1 µg and is specific for GH, because no other pituitary-related hormones (e.g., thyroid hormones, testosterone) produce epiphyseal widening of the magnitude or in the dose-response fashion seen after administration of GH (13). Furthermore, the plasma and pituitary samples from our nerve-stimulated rats do not contain sufficient levels of these hormones to induce the amounts of tibial growth seen after injection into the bioassay rats (13; unpublished observations). Although we cannot absolutely exclude the possibility of hormone interactions within the assay animal, the plasma levels of the other hormones that might induce growth in the control and stimulated rats are similar and thus cannot account for the differences in tibial growth rates seen in the bioassay results. In addition, all pituitary-dependent hormones, including the insulin-like growth factors, should be at minimal concentrations in the rats used for bioassay, because they were hypophysectomized 2 wk before being used in the experiments.
Physiological significance of bGH. The physiological significance of bGH has yet to be fully determined. However, the fact that bGH promotes tibial epiphyseal widening in a dose-response fashion paralleling 22-kDa GH suggests that bGH may also be an effective therapeutic agent in growth-related abnormalities. Clinical situations have been described in which 1) young patients grow normally, despite being diagnosed as GH deficient by immunoassay and provocative testing; or 2) adult patients show symptoms of acromegaly (acromegaloidism), despite having normal or low circulating iGH concentrations (1, 12). Although normal growth can occur in humans in the absence of iGH, it is not known whether this growth can be attributed to bGH. However, the growth both in the iGH-deficient humans and in the tibial epiphyseal plate of the hypophysectomized bioassay rats suggests that there are pituitary-derived factors other than iGH that can have major growth-promoting effects.
The present data indicate that bGH can be neurally regulated. Additional data supporting the idea of neural as well as humoral regulation of the anterior pituitary have been published (20, 22, 23). Afferent pathways have been demonstrated that project from rat hindlimb muscles to hypothalamic nuclei, including the paraventricular nucleus, which has a known role in iGH regulation (5, 7). Furthermore, nerve fibers have been observed surrounding hormone-producing cells (somatotrophs, corticotrophs) in the anterior pituitary of the rat, and these fibers are plastic in response to changes in the hormonal status of the animal (20, 22, 23). Finally, Hoffmann et al. (16) have proposed a mechanism by which skeletal muscle afferent projections to the hypothalamus can function in the regulation of opioids. In conclusion, results from the present study indicate that afferent input from fast skeletal muscles associated with movement and posture can play a role in increasing bGH release, but not iGH release, in the anesthetized rat. This specific mechanism of regulation of release of bGH, however, could be shared with regulatory factors other than the neural one identified by the present experiments. These results raise numerous questions related to the control mechanisms and the potential ramifications of prolonged bed rest, spaceflight, spinal cord injury, and neuromuscular maladies that minimize or eliminate sensory input to the endocrine system.| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
The authors thank Paul Fung for assistance in the measurement of plasma metabolites.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This work was supported by National Aeronautics and Space Administration Grant 199-26-12-09 (to R. E. Grindeland, R. R. Roy, and V. R. Edgerton). K. L. Gosselink was supported by a predoctoral training grant (National Research Service Award) from the National Institute of Dental Research (Grant DE-07212).
Portions of this work have been published previously in abstract form (14).
Address for reprint requests: V. R. Edgerton, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Dept. of Physiological Science, 1804 Life Sciences, 405 Hilgard Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90095-1527 (E-mail: vre{at}ucla.edu).
Received 7 July 1997; accepted in final form 18 December 1997.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Ashcraft, M. W.,
P. I. Hartzland,
A. J. Van Herle,
N. Bersch,
and
D. W. Golde.
A unique growth factor in patients with acromegaloidism.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
57:
272-276,
1983[Abstract].
2.
Baumann, G.
Growth hormone heterogeneity: genes, isohormones, variants, and binding proteins.
Endocr. Rev.
12:
424-449,
1991[Abstract].
3.
Baumann, G. Metabolism of growth hormone (GH) and different
molecular forms of GH in biological fluids. Hormone Res. 36, Suppl. 1:
5-10, 1991.
4.
Baumann, G.,
M. L. Vance,
M. A. Shaw,
and
M. O. Thorner.
Plasma transport of human growth hormone in vivo.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
71:
470-473,
1990[Abstract].
5.
Burstein, R.,
R. J. Dado,
K. D. Cliffer,
and
G. J. Giesler, Jr.
Physiological characterization of spinohypothalamic tract neurons in the lumbar enlargement of rats.
J. Neurophysiol.
66:
261-284,
1991
6.
Butkus, J. A.,
R. S. Brogan,
A. Giustina,
G. Kastello,
M. Sothmann,
and
W. B. Wehrenberg.
Changes in the growth hormone axis due to exercise training in male and female rats: secretory and molecular responses.
Endocrinology
136:
2664-2670,
1995[Abstract].
7.
Cliffer, K. D.,
R. Burstein,
and
G. J. Giesler, Jr.
Distributions of spinothalamic, spinohypothalamic, and spinotelencephalic fibers revealed by anterograde transport of PHA-L in rats.
J. Neurosci.
11:
852-868,
1991[Abstract].
8.
Edgerton, V. R.,
and
R. R. Roy.
Neuromuscular adaptations to actual and simulated spaceflight.
In: Handbook of Physiology. Environmental Physiology. III. The Gravitational Environment. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1996, sect. 4, vol. I, chapt. 32, p. 721-763.
9.
Ellis, S.,
and
R. E. Grindeland.
Dichotomy between bio- and immunoassayable growth hormone.
In: Advances in Human Growth Hormone Research. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1974, p. 409-433.
10.
Ellis, S.,
R. E. Grindeland,
T. J. Reilly,
and
S. H. Yang.
Studies on the nature of plasma growth hormone.
In: Growth Hormone and Related Peptides. New York: Elsevier, 1976, p. 75-83.
11.
Ellis, S.,
M. A. Vodian,
and
R. E. Grindeland.
Studies on the purification and characterization of growth hormone from plasma.
Recent Prog. Horm. Res.
34:
213-238,
1978.
12.
Geffner, M. E.
The growth without growth hormone syndrome.
Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am.
25:
649-663,
1996[Medline].
13.
Greenspan, F. S.,
C. H. Li,
M. E. Simpson,
and
H. M. Evans.
Bioassay of hypophyseal growth hormone: the tibia test.
Endocrinology
45:
455-463,
1949.
14.
Grindeland, R. E.,
R. R. Roy,
V. R. Edgerton,
K. L. Gosselink,
E. J. Grossman,
and
P. E. Sawchenko.
Secretion of growth hormone in response to muscle sensory nerve stimulation (Abstract).
In: Proc. 76th Ann. Mtg. Endocrine Soc., Anaheim, CA 1994, 1994, p. 485.
15.
Grindeland, R. E.,
A. T. Smith,
E. S. Evans,
and
S. Ellis.
Induction of chronic growth hormone deficiency by anti-GH serum.
Endocrinology
95:
793-798,
1974[Medline].
16.
Hoffmann, P.,
I. H. Jonsdottir,
and
P. Thorén.
Activation of different opioid systems by muscle activity and exercise.
News Physiol. Sci.
11:
223-228,
1996.
17.
Hymer, W. C., R. E. Grindeland, I. Krasnov,
I. Victorov, K. Motter, P. Mukherjee, K. Shellenberger, and M. Vasques. Effects of spaceflight on rat pituitary cell function.
J. Appl. Physiol. 73, Suppl.: 151S-157S, 1992.
18.
Hymer, W. C.,
R. E. Grindeland,
T. Salada,
R. Cenci,
K. Krishnan,
C. Mukai,
and
S. Nagaoka.
Feeding frequency affects cultured rat pituitary cells in low gravity.
J. Biotechnol.
47:
289-312,
1996[Medline].
19.
Hymer, W. C.,
R. E. Grindeland,
T. Salada,
P. Nye,
E. J. Grossman,
and
P. K. Lane.
Experimental modification of rat pituitary growth hormone cell function during and after spaceflight.
J. Appl. Physiol.
80:
955-970,
1996
20.
Ju, G.,
S.-J. Liu,
and
D. Ma.
Calcitonin gene-related peptide- and substance P-like immunoreactive innervation of the anterior pituitary in the rat.
Neuroscience
54:
981-989,
1993[Medline].
21.
Krasnov, I. B.
Gravitational neuromorphology.
Adv. Space Biol. Med.
4:
85-110,
1994[Medline].
22.
Lu, C. R.,
F. T. Meng,
L. I. Benowitz,
and
G. Ju.
Evidence for axonal sprouting in the anterior pituitary following adrenalectomy in the rat.
J. Endocrinol.
147:
161-166,
1995[Abstract].
23.
Paden, C. M.,
C. W. Moffett,
and
L. I. Benowitz.
Innervation of the rat anterior and neurointermediate pituitary visualized by immunocytochemistry for the growth-associated protein GAP-43.
Endocrinology
134:
503-506,
1994[Abstract].
24.
Polyakov, I. V., V. I. Drobyshev, and
I. B. Krasnov. Morphological changes in the spinal cord
and intervertebral ganglia of rats exposed to different gravity levels.
Physiologist 34, Suppl.: S187-S188, 1991.
25.
Roy, R. R.,
D. L. Hutchison,
D. J. Pierotti,
J. A. Hodgson,
and
V. R. Edgerton.
EMG patterns of rat ankle extensors and flexors during treadmill locomotion and swimming.
J. Appl. Physiol.
70:
2522-2529,
1991
26.
Schalch, D. S.,
and
S. Reichlin.
Plasma growth hormone concentrations in the rat determined by radioimmunoassay: influence of sex, pregnancy, lactation, anesthesia, hypophysectomy and extrasellar pituitary transplants.
Endocrinology
79:
275-280,
1966[Medline].
27.
Steel, R. G. D.,
and
J. H. Torrie.
Linear regression.
In: Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960, p. 161-182.
28.
Warner, M. D.,
Y. N. Sinha,
and
C. A. Peabody.
Growth hormone and prolactin variants in normal subjects: relative proportions in morning and afternoon samples.
Horm. Metab. Res.
25:
425-429,
1993[Medline].
29.
Yarasheski, K. E.
Growth hormone effects on metabolism, body composition, muscle mass, and strength.
Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev.
22:
285-312,
1994[Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. R. Pierce, B. C. Clark, L. L. Ploutz-Snyder, and J. A. Kanaley Growth hormone and muscle function responses to skeletal muscle ischemia J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2006; 101(6): 1588 - 1595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Bigbee, R. E. Grindeland, R. R. Roy, H. Zhong, K. L. Gosselink, S. Arnaud, and V. R. Edgerton Basal and evoked levels of bioassayable growth hormone are altered by hindlimb unloading J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2006; 100(3): 1037 - 1042. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Gosselink, R. R. Roy, H. Zhong, R. E. Grindeland, A. J. Bigbee, and V. R. Edgerton Vibration-induced activation of muscle afferents modulates bioassayable growth hormone release J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2004; 96(6): 2097 - 2102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Nemet, S. Hong, P. J. Mills, M. G. Ziegler, M. Hill, and D. M. Cooper Systemic vs. local cytokine and leukocyte responses to unilateral wrist flexion exercise J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2002; 93(2): 546 - 554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Stokes, M. E. Nevill, G. M. Hall, and H. K. A. Lakomy Growth hormone responses to repeated maximal cycle ergometer exercise at different pedaling rates J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2002; 92(2): 602 - 608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. C. Hymer, W. J. Kraemer, B. C. Nindl, J. O. Marx, D. E. Benson, J. R. Welsch, S. A. Mazzetti, J. S. Volek, and D. R. Deaver Characteristics of circulating growth hormone in women after acute heavy resistance exercise Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, October 1, 2001; 281(4): E878 - E887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Bigbee, K. L. Gosselink, R. R. Roy, R. E. Grindeland, and V. R. Edgerton Bioassayable growth hormone release in rats in response to a single bout of treadmill exercise J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2000; 89(6): 2174 - 2178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. E . McCall, R . E . Grindeland, R. R. Roy, and V. R. Edgerton Muscle afferent activity modulates bioassayable growth hormone in human plasma J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2000; 89(3): 1137 - 1141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. R. Edgerton and R. R. Roy Physiology of a Microgravity Environment: Invited Review: Gravitational biology of the neuromotor systems: a perspective to the next era J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2000; 89(3): 1224 - 1231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Eliakim, Y. Oh, and D. M. Cooper Effect of single wrist exercise on fibroblast growth factor-2, insulin-like growth factor, and growth hormone Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2000; 279(2): R548 - R553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Takarada, Y. Nakamura, S. Aruga, T. Onda, S. Miyazaki, and N. Ishii Rapid increase in plasma growth hormone after low-intensity resistance exercise with vascular occlusion J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2000; 88(1): 61 - 65. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Gosselink, R. E. Grindeland, R. R. Roy, H. Zhong, A. J. Bigbee, and V. R. Edgerton Afferent input from rat slow skeletal muscle inhibits bioassayable growth hormone release J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2000; 88(1): 142 - 148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Wideman, J. Y. Weltman, N. Shah, S. Story, J. D. Veldhuis, and A. Weltman Effects of gender on exercise-induced growth hormone release J Appl Physiol, September 1, 1999; 87(3): 1154 - 1162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. E. McCall, C. Goulet, R. R. Roy, R. E. Grindeland, G. I. Boorman, A. J. Bigbee, J. A. Hodgson, M. C. Greenisen, and V. R. Edgerton Spaceflight suppresses exercise-induced release of bioassayable growth hormone J Appl Physiol, September 1, 1999; 87(3): 1207 - 1212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |