Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Corrigendum for Waters et al., J Appl Physiol 83 (2) 522-529.
J Appl Physiol 84: 1a, 1998;
8750-7587/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Vol. 84, Issue 4, 1a-1a, April 1998

CORRIGENDA

Volume 83, August 1997 

Page 522, Abstract: In line 20 of the Abstract, "arterial PO2" was mistakenly printed instead of "arterial PCO2." The corrected Abstract is reprinted below.

Waters, Karen A., André Laferrière, Julie Paquette, Cynthia Goodyer, and Immanuela R. Moss. Curtailed respiration by repeated vs. isolated hypoxia in maturing piglets is unrelated to NTS ME or SP levels. J. Appl. Physiol. 83(2): 522-529, 1997.---In early development, respiratory disorders can produce recurring hypoxic episodes during sleep. To examine possible effects of daily repeated vs. isolated hypoxic hypoxia, cardiorespiratory functions and central, respiratory-related neuromodulator levels in 21- to 32-day-old, chronically instrumented, unsedated piglets were compared between a fifth sequential daily hypoxia and an isolated hypoxia (10% O2-90% N2 for 30 min). Diaphragmatic electromyographic activity, heart rate and arterial pressure, and pH and gas tensions were measured. In vivo microdialysis, via chronically implanted guides, served to sample interstitial substance P (SP) and methionine-enkephalin (ME) at the level of the respiratory-related nucleus tractus solitarii (NTS). Compared with an isolated hypoxia, repeated hypoxia resulted in 1) lower respiratory frequency (f), ventilation equivalent, and arterial pH, higher arterial PCO2 during hypoxia, and lower f in recovery from hypoxia; and 2) increased SP concentrations but no change in ME concentrations. We conclude that, in these maturing swine, repeated vs. isolated hypoxic exposure curtails respiratory responses to hypoxia by a mechanism(s) unrelated to SP or ME levels at the NTS.


J APPL PHYSIOL 84(4):1a-1a




This Article
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online