|
|
||||||||
Vol. 84, Issue 3, 939-947, March 1998
Exercise Science and Hyperbaric Units, Departments of Medicine and Statistics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study
examined the physiological effect of reduced plasma cortisol (C) during
prolonged exercise in humans. The effects of normal C (NC) were
compared with metyrapone-induced low C (LC) on plasma substrate
availability and the respiratory exchange ratio during 2 h of exercise
at ~60% peak O2 consumption in
nine subjects. The C responses were compared with preexercise (Pre) levels and with a rest day (Con). At rest, C was attenuated by ~70%
for LC compared with NC. At rest, plasma glucose, lactate, glycerol,
-hydroxybutyrate, alanine, branched-chain amino acids, insulin,
glucagon, growth hormone, epinephrine, and norepinephrine were similar
under LC and NC (P > 0.05). During
exercise under NC, plasma C increased compared with Pre, whereas it
remained unchanged during LC. During NC, plasma C was elevated at 90 min (compared with Con) and at 120 min (compared with Con and Pre). During exercise, plasma glucose decreased to the same extent and lactate was similar under both conditions, whereas plasma glycerol,
-hydroxybutyrate, alanine, and branched-chain amino acids were higher (P < 0.01) under NC. Plasma
insulin declined (P = 0.01) to a
greater extent under LC, whereas growth hormone, epinephrine, and
norepinephrine tended to be higher (0.05
P
0.10). Plasma glucagon increased
under both conditions (P < 0.01).
The respiratory exchange ratio did not differ between conditions. We
conclude that, during exercise, 1) C
accelerates lipolysis, ketogenesis, and proteolysis;
2) under LC, glucoregulatory hormone
adjustments maintain glucose homeostasis; and
3) LC does not alter whole body substrate utilization or the ability to complete 2 h of moderate exercise.
glucose; lipids; amino acids; adrenal gland; pancreas
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
THE RATES OF HEPATIC glucose production, lipolysis, and
proteolysis are normally regulated by the nervous and endocrine systems (i.e., insulin and the counterregulatory hormones). During intense exercise [>85% maximal
O2 consumption
(
O2 max)],
hepatic glucose production increases six- to eightfold, matching or
slightly exceeding glucose uptake (24, 33). This accelerated hepatic
glucose production is observed in the presence of little or no change in plasma glucagon and plasma insulin concentrations. On the other hand, plasma catecholamines are elevated 7- to 10-fold, suggesting that
during intense exercise the major regulators of hepatic glucose production are the catecholamines (24, 33). At moderate exercise intensities and longer durations (e.g., 60 min at 60%
O2 max), the primacy of
the catecholamines in maintaining hepatic glucose production is
questionable (26), whereas the primacy of insulin and glucagon in
preventing hypoglycemia has been established (20, 38). However, this
does not prove that other hormones or neurotransmitters are not
involved in the prevention of hypoglycemia during exercise.
It has been >40 years since the effects of exercise on glucocorticoid levels were first described in humans (34). Since then, we have learned that the increase in cortisol is dependent on the intensity and duration of the exercise bout (9). We recently reported that the cortisol response is also observed in children (12). Additionally, it is known that, after the administration of a labeled glucocorticoid, glucocorticoid receptor activation steadily increases to a similar extent during rest and exercise (8). However, little is known about the physiological significance of cortisol during exercise in humans. At rest, some of the metabolic functions of cortisol related to fuel homeostasis include 1) modest increases in hepatic glucose production; 2) proteolysis, allowing amino acid oxidation and/or their entrance into gluconeogenesis; 3) lipolysis, allowing oxidation of nonesterified fatty acids, glycerol's entrance into gluconeogenesis, and ketogenesis; 4) a reduction in insulin-dependent peripheral glucose uptake, thus ensuring blood glucose supply to the brain; and 5) an increase in the rate of synthesis of gluconeogenic enzymes in the liver (4, 10, 14-18, 30, 31). Furthermore, it is well known that cortisol plays an important role in the defense against prolonged insulin-induced hypoglycemia at rest (4, 10). Thus it is plausible that during prolonged exercise (>60 min) the role of cortisol in glucose homeostasis may become apparent.
The few studies that have examined the effect of adrenocortical insufficiency during exercise have suggested a reduced work capacity, which is improved by appropriate cortisol replacement. The decrease in work capacity is characterized by cardiovascular instability and skeletal muscle weakness (28, 40). Others have reported (2, 21) that hypopituitary and adrenalectomized subjects showed proper or even exaggerated metabolic responses during moderate to heavy exercise when glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid replacement was adequate. Unfortunately, these studies did not provide information on substrates or hormonal responses when the cortisol replacement was discontinued.
There is a paucity of data on the effects of high and/or low cortisol on blood glucose and other substrates during exercise in humans. The effects of cortisol during exercise are by and large based on studies performed on animals (see Ref. 36 for review). Furthermore, very little is known concerning the physiological significance of the transient increase in cortisol levels during exercise. This lack of information is probably because many of cortisol's effects are delayed compared with the more fast-acting hormones. However, this does not negate its potential significance during exercise. Perhaps contrasting a prolonged bout of exercise under normal and low preexercise cortisol levels will provide insights about the metabolic effects of cortisol during exercise in humans. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the physiological effects of a low plasma cortisol concentration on 1) the concentration of plasma substrates, 2) whole body substrate utilization, 3) substrate-regulating hormones, and 4) selected cardiovascular responses during prolonged exercise. To address these issues, we administered metyrapone (a pharmacological agent that blocks cortisol synthesis) to maintain a low-cortisol (LC) condition and compared that treatment with a control condition [normal cortisol (NC)] in which the subjects received a placebo (allowing the morning cortisol peak to occur).
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects.
Nine healthy, nonsmoking college students (5 men and 4 women) were
recruited from the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, to participate
in the study. The subjects' age, height, weight, and peak
O2 consumption
(
O2 peak) were 26.6 ± 1.1 yr, 1.72 ± 0.02 m, 73.6 ± 4.3 kg, and 40.6 ± 1.3 ml · kg
1 · min
1,
respectively. Each subject completed a health history questionnaire and
was asked to read and sign an informed consent form, which was approved
by the University of Tennessee's Institutional Review Board. The
subjects were not taking any medication (including oral contraceptives)
or suffering from any metabolic disorder (i.e., diabetes, thyroid gland
abnormalities). Additionally, the subjects were asked to refrain from
exercise, alcohol, and caffeine for 24 h before reporting to the
laboratory. The subjects were reminded to maintain consistent
preexercise diets during the course of the experiment. The menstrual
phase shows no consistent effect on cortisol levels (13, 23) during
prolonged exercise and, therefore, was not controlled. Each subject
reported to the laboratory on 3 separate days, completing baseline
measurements and a graded exercise test on the first visit and a
submaximal exercise test on the second and third visits.
Baseline measurements and graded exercise test. On the first visit each subject arrived at the laboratory at ~0730, and height and weight were measured and recorded. The subject was then taken to a quiet room and seated in recumbent position, and the right hand was heated with an electrically heated pad kept at 65-70°C. A 21-gauge Teflon catheter was placed in a retrograde fashion into a right hand dorsal vein to obtain arterialized venous blood (27). Each subject remained seated for the collection of a 2-ml blood sample at 30-min intervals from 0800 to 1000. The intravenous line was kept patent with a continuous drip of 154 nmol/l NaCl solution. The blood samples were used to monitor the cortisol circadian rhythm for statistical comparison between resting and exercise conditions (5, 35).
After the collection of the last resting blood sample the subject sat on a pendulum-style cycle ergometer (model 817E, Monarck, Varberg, Sweden). A graded exercise test was conducted to determine the subject's 2.5 mmol/l lactate threshold and
O2 peak. The expired
gas was analyzed continuously by previously calibrated O2 (Ametek
O2 analyzer) and
CO2 (model S-3A/1 LB-2, Beckman)
analyzers. An Apple II+ computer was interfaced with the gas analyzers
and the dry gas meter by using Rayfield REP-200C software to calculate O2 uptake and
CO2 production, ventilation,
respiratory rate, and respiratory exchange ratio (RER). Each subject
pedaled the cycle ergometer for successive 3-min stages starting at a
work rate of 60-105 W depending on the subject's fitness level
(as assessed by the medical history questionnaire) with subsequent 15- to 17.5-W increments every 3 min. At the end of each stage, a 2-ml
blood sample was collected from the previously inserted catheter for immediate lactate analysis. When two subsequent stages generated blood
lactate levels >2.5 mmol/l, the power output was increased by
30-35 W per 1-min stage until volitional fatigue. The lactate threshold was defined as that power output at which the concentration of blood lactate was ~2.5 mmol/l.
Submaximal exercise test.
Approximately 1 wk after the first visit, each subject performed one of
two submaximal rides (metyrapone or placebo) using a single-blind
design with test order balanced. Both exercise bouts required the
subject to pedal at the power output associated with the 2.5 mmol/l
lactate concentration. To examine the effects of low cortisol levels
during exercise, metyrapone or placebo was self-administered (orally)
by each subject at midnight. Each subject was given a dose equivalent
to 30 mg/kg to the nearest 250 mg and advised to take it with a glass
of milk or yogurt at midnight immediately before sleep (22).
Additionally, the subjects ingested two capsules (500 mg metyrapone or
placebo) with water at the onset of the exercise. Metyrapone causes few
side effects in healthy individuals and can be taken without
hospitalization. If any clinical symptomatology indicated the presence
of adrenal insufficiency (i.e., hypotension), hydrocortisone (100 mg)
was to be infused, and the test would have been terminated. To allow sufficient time for washout of the drug, the submaximal exercise tests
were separated by at least 4 days (4-10 days). Each subject arrived at ~0730, and weight was measured and recorded. A 21-gauge Teflon catheter was placed in a retrograde fashion into a right hand
dorsal vein to obtain arterialized venous blood (27), and a constant
drip (~1 ml/min) of 154 nmol/l NaCl solution was used to keep the
catheter patent. At ~0800 each subject was transferred to the cycle
ergometer to pedal at a power output equal to the previously determined
2.5 mmol/l lactate threshold for 120 min. The exercise intensity was
set relative to the fixed 2.5 mmol/l lactate threshold to reduce
intersubject variability in blood glucose kinetics that exists when
exercise intensities are set relative to percent
O2 max (6).
O2 was measured from the
onset of the exercise to the 8th min and for 5 min at 25, 55, 85, and
115 min of exercise. A 12-lead electrode placement was used with an
electrocardiograph (model ECG-MAC II/ST, Marquette Electronics,
Milwaukee, WI) to monitor heart rate and electrocardiogram every 15 min. The rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was recorded at 30, 60, 90, and 120 min of exercise. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were
measured and recorded at rest and every 15 min thereafter by an
automated system (Colin STBP-780). The laboratory was maintained at
21-26°C, and subjects were cooled by fans blowing from the
front and back throughout exercise. Additionally, subjects drank cold
water ad libitum. At the end of the experiments, the catheter was
removed and the subject was fed ~80 g of carbohydrate in the form of
fruit juice and fruit bar. Additionally, after both trials the subject
was given a prophylactic oral dose of 20 mg of cortisone and monitored for 15 min before being discharged from the Applied Physiology Laboratory.
Sample collection and analysis.
A 10-ml blood sample was collected at rest and at 30, 60, 90, and 120 min of exercise; an additional 2-ml blood sample was withdrawn and
immediately analyzed for blood glucose and lactate at 15, 45, 75, and
105 min of exercise. The 10-ml blood samples were separated into three
chilled tubes: 1 ml for glucagon analysis; 3 ml for epinephrine and
norepinephrine analysis; and 6 ml for glucose, glycerol,
-hydroxybutyrate, alanine, branched-chain amino acid (BCAA),
insulin, growth hormone, and cortisol analyses. All tubes were kept on
ice before collection and until later centrifugation at 4°C.
Samples from a given subject were analyzed concurrently in duplicate to
reduce variability. Plasma volume shifts were ignored, because the
actual plasma cortisol concentration that affects target tissues was of
interest and because subjects served as their own controls in the
repeated-measures design.
20°C. Plasma glucagon was analyzed in duplicate by a
commercially available radioimmunoassay kit (ICN Biomedicals, Costa
Mesa, CA). Three milliliters of the blood sample were mixed with 60 µl of an ethylene glycol-bis(
-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic
acid-glutathione solution to yield a final concentration of 1.8 mg of
ethylene glycol-bis(
-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic
acid and 1.2 mg of glutathione per mililiter of blood. The samples were
centrifuged within 15 min of collection at 7,000 rpm for 10 min at
4°C. The plasma was then stored frozen at
20°C until
analysis for plasma catecholamines. The plasma catecholamines were
determined in duplicate by the assay of Passon and Peuler (29). The
catechol-O-methyltransferase was
obtained from rat livers by the purification procedure of Axelrod and
Tomchick (1). Six milliliters of the blood sample were centrifuged at
3,000 rpm for 20 min at 4°C to obtain plasma. Plasma was aliquoted
for analysis of insulin, growth hormone, and cortisol, all of which
were determined in duplicate by radioimmunoassay kits (ICN
Biomedicals).
A 10-µl plasma sample was used to determine glycerol by a
spectrophotometric method (procedure 337, Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO). For the measurement of alanine and
-hydroxybutyrate, 0.5 ml of
plasma was deproteinized with 0.5 ml of 1 M perchloric acid, centrifuged, neutralized with KOH, and aliquoted in microcentrifuge tubes.
-Hydroxybutyrate (39) and alanine (25) were analyzed by
enzymatic fluorometric methods. To measure total BCAA, 0.1 ml of plasma
was deproteinized in 1 ml of 0.3 M perchloric acid, centrifuged, and
stored in microcentrifuge tubes. BCAAs were determined by a referenced
enzymatic fluorometric method (19).
Statistical analysis. The data were analyzed as a two-factor within-subject (treatment × time) repeated-measures analysis of variance. SAS General Linear Model procedures were employed. Specific contrasts of interest comparing responses under the two conditions at different times and/or comparing responses from one time to another within conditions were tested for significance. Significance levels are reported for contrasts of interest. Values are means ± SE.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Metyrapone treatment. In general, the overnight metyrapone dose was well tolerated, and no serious side effects were reported by the subjects who completed the study. One of the nine subjects reported feeling dizziness and confusion after the overnight dose; another subject reported stomach discomfort and a burning sensation. However, the former subject later reported failing to ingest metyrapone as instructed (i.e., with milk/yogurt). These side effects started soon after metyrapone ingestion and lasted ~15 min. Additionally, we documented a hypotensive reaction in one subject. The subject arrived at the laboratory, was catheterized, and soon developed persistent hypotension, which was corrected with infusion of 100 mg iv hydrocortisone sodium succinate (Solu-Cortef). It is possible that LC (166 nmol/l compared with 552 nmol/l on a control day) and the emotional stress of inserting the catheter might have precipitated the hypotension, which was rapidly corrected by increasing the cortisol levels (1,932 nmol/l). This subject chose to withdraw from the study. The additional metyrapone dose that subjects ingested at the onset of exercise caused no serious side effects. Nevertheless, two subjects reported mild stomach discomfort that subsided within 15 min of metyrapone ingestion. Importantly, this discomfort could have been due to the use of water to ingest the drug at the onset of exercise (rather than milk). We conclude that, despite mild side effects, this drug can be used safely in exercise studies if appropriate precautions are followed.
Plasma cortisol levels. At rest (0800) cortisol concentrations averaged 512 ± 42 and 493 ± 44 nmol/l on NC and control days, respectively; metyrapone lowered the resting cortisol concentration by 70% to 145 ± 31 nmol/l (P < 0.01). Figure 1 shows that during the control day plasma cortisol fell rapidly (P < 0.01) from 0800 to 0930 and leveled off from 0930 to 1000. During exercise under NC, plasma cortisol increased 20% to 617 ± 64 nmol/l by the 120th min compared with preexercise values (P < 0.01). However, when the cortisol response was compared with the same time point during the control day, an 80% increase was detected at 90 min (P < 0.05) followed by another increase to 120% at 120 min (P < 0.01). During exercise under LC, cortisol remained unchanged and was significantly lower than on the control day (P < 0.01) and the NC trial (P < 0.01), providing an adequate model for the study.
|
O2 peak, heart rate,
RPE, and blood pressure.
Table 1 shows that during both exercise
trials the subjects exercised at a similar percent
O2 peak, heart rate,
diastolic blood pressure, and RPE, whereas systolic blood pressure
tended to be lower (P = 0.11).
|
Plasma glucose and blood lactate. Figure 2 shows that preexercise plasma glucose (4.96 ± 0.18 and 4.71 ± 0.15 mmol/l) and blood lactate (0.84 ± 0.05 and 0.92 ± 0.04 mmol/l) were similar under NC and LC, respectively. Exercise led to a small but significant decrease in plasma glucose during both trials (P < 0.05), whereas the blood lactate rose to ~2.5 mmol/l at 15 min under both conditions, but by the 120th min it had declined to nearly resting values. Lactate tended to be slightly elevated under LC compared with NC conditions (P = 0.13).
|
Plasma glycerol and
-hydroxybutyrate.
Preexercise glycerol (0.078 ± 0.014 and 0.090 ± 0.012 mmol/l)
and
-hydroxybutyrate (0.103 ± 0.012 and 0.095 ± 0.010 mmol/l) were similar under NC and LC, respectively. During exercise,
glycerol and
-hydroxybutyrate (Fig. 3)
increased in both trials but showed a different rate of change for the
two conditions (P < 0.01 and P < 0.01, respectively). Under LC,
glycerol and
-hydroxybutyrate increased more slowly over time.
|
Plasma alanine and BCAA. Figure 4 shows that preexercise plasma alanine was similar (P = 0.22) under both experimental conditions (0.217 ± 0.009 and 0.176 ± 0.012 mmol/l). Although this difference was not statistically significant, it appeared to be large enough to warrant an analysis of the data in terms of change from baseline. During the first 60 min of exercise, alanine increased in both trials (P < 0.01), but by 120 min it had declined to nearly resting levels. Furthermore, during LC an attenuation was observed at 30, 60, 90, and 120 min (P < 0.05) compared with NC. Plasma BCAA (Fig. 4) tended to be lower at rest (P = 0.073) under LC than under NC. Again, to distinguish the differences between the treatment and exercise effects, we analyzed the data in terms of change from baseline. The analysis indicated a treatment effect at 120 min of exercise (P < 0.01). Furthermore, during exercise under NC, plasma BCAA increased at 90 and 120 min (P < 0.05), whereas under LC a decrease in BCAA was detected by 120 min compared with preexercise (P < 0.05).
|
Plasma insulin, glucagon, and growth hormone. Preexercise plasma insulin (86.1 ± 10.6 and 78.6 ± 11.4 pmol/l) and glucagon (41.4 ± 5.5 and 43.3 ± 5.3 pmol/l) were not different between treatments (Fig. 5). Plasma insulin declined over time under both conditions; however, insulin was reduced to a greater extent under LC than under NC (P < 0.01). This effect was detected at 30 (P < 0.05), 60 (P < 0.05), 90 (P < 0.01), and 120 min (P < 0.01). Plasma glucagon rose over time to a similar extent under both conditions, peaking at 120 min (P < 0.01). However, the increase was observed earlier during NC (90 min) than during LC (120 min). Preexercise plasma growth hormone (3.04 ± 0.58 and 2.25 ± 0.61 µg/l) was similar during both trials. Growth hormone (Fig. 6) increased over time under both conditions (P < 0.05); however, the increase was detected earlier under LC (30 min) than under NC (60 min). Furthermore, the growth hormone response under LC showed two distinct peaks compared with the gradual increase during NC. The growth hormone response tended to be higher during LC at 30 min (P = 0.0559) and at 120 min (P = 0.067).
|
|
Plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine. Preexercise plasma epinephrine (0.407 ± 0.031 and 0.436 ± 0.039 nmol/l) and norepinephrine (2.42 ± 0.23 and 2.44 ± 0.29 nmol/l) were similar during NC and LC, respectively. During exercise, epinephrine (Fig. 7) rose over time in both trials (P < 0.05) and tended to be higher (P = 0.07) during LC. Similarly, plasma norepinephrine (Fig. 7) rose over time (P < 0.01) in both trials and showed a tendency (P = 0.10) to be higher during LC.
|
RER. The RER (Fig. 8) decreased (P < 0.01) over time (compared with the 8th min), indicating an increase in lipid oxidation with no difference between treatments.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Metyrapone has been found to have no intrinsic effects on substrates
and counterregulatory hormones and has been extensively used in
metabolic studies with (10, 14, 15, 30, 31) and without (30, 31)
peripheral cortisol replacement. Consistent with previous studies at
rest (30, 31), metyrapone suppressed cortisol by ~70% during
exercise, ranging in intensity from ~50 to 70%
O2 peak.
During NC, cortisol levels increased by ~20% at the 120th min of
exercise compared with preexercise values. However, when the exercise
responses were compared with those measured during the control day, the
increase was detected earlier (i.e., 90 min of exercise) and was of
greater magnitude (80%). Moreover, the difference at the 120th min
reached 120%. These results confirm and extend the findings of others
(5, 35) who have recommended that exercise-induced cortisol responses be compared with values measured at the same time points of a rest day
rather than with a preexercise value.
In both trials the subjects exercised at a similar heart rate and
percent
O2 peak and
reported similar RPE values. This is important in making appropriate
comparisons between trials and suggests that an acute three- to
fourfold reduction in the plasma cortisol level has little bearing on
tolerance to prolonged exercise of moderate intensity. On the other
hand, it is known that chronic adrenocortical insufficiency limits work
capacity and tolerance to prolonged exercise in animals (36) and in
humans (28, 40). These studies have suggested that glucocorticoid deficiency limits exercise tolerance by inducing cardiovascular instability and muscle weakness and pain. To our knowledge, this is the
first study to demonstrate that an acute cortisol deficit does not
alter blood pressure, heart rate, RPE, and the ability to complete a
prolonged exercise bout, at least in healthy young men and women.
Blood glucose is tightly regulated during exercise, and seldom does overt hypoglycemia develop. It is well known that when one or more of the glucoregulatory hormones is pharmacologically suppressed, there is a compensatory response by one or more of the others. This defense of the glucoregulatory control system is based on redundant mechanisms (7). In keeping with this concept, our results suggest that blood glucose is tightly regulated during exercise independent of cortisol levels. This is in contrast to previous studies in humans at rest (10, 14, 15, 18), which have consistently demonstrated an attenuating effect of LC on plasma glucose and hepatic glucose production/gluconeogenesis. The discrepancy may be explained, at least in part, by the fact that in those studies longer experimental protocols and more sophisticated designs were used (i.e., hormone clamps with fixed peripheral replacement and multiple tracers). In the present study, metyrapone suppressed cortisol but allowed the other glucoregulatory hormones to change. Insulin levels were consistently lower during the LC trial, whereas growth hormone, epinephrine, and norepinephrine tended to increase (P = 0.05-0.10), thus providing reasonable evidence of a compensatory response. For instance, a drop in insulin (a well-known regulator of hepatic glucose production during exercise) could account for the glucose counterregulation (38). Surprisingly, plasma glucagon did not differ between trials. The present study did not show a treatment effect on glucose and lactate concentrations or the RER. These are gross estimates of whole body carbohydrate metabolism during exercise. Thus we cannot automatically rule out quantitative and/or qualitative alterations in hepatic glucose production, tissue glucose uptake, and muscle glycogen utilization. Our findings indicate that when the glucoregulatory hormones are allowed to change, glucose homeostasis is preserved independent of three- to fourfold differences in plasma cortisol. To better isolate the effects of cortisol on glucose homeostasis, a more elaborate methodology is in order. For instance, the pituitary-adrenal-pancreatic clamp, in which the release of glucoregulatory hormones is blocked and peripherally replaced at a fixed rate (11), and the use of tracers would provide a more powerful model to examine the effects of cortisol on substrate kinetics during exercise.
The present study examined the effect of cortisol levels on lipid
catabolism. Our findings indicate that cortisol alters lipid availability during exercise. We found that cortisol had no significant effect on baseline plasma glycerol and
-hydroxybutyrate
concentrations, whereas during exercise the rate at which glycerol and
-hydroxybutyrate increased over time was attenuated under LC
compared with NC. The magnitude of the attenuating effects on lipid
catabolism was modest (~20-35% by 120 min) and did not affect
fat oxidation (RER was the same). At rest, it is well known that lipid
catabolism is affected by glucocorticoids. For instance, it has been
reported that physiological hypercortisolinemia (~970 nmol/l)
increases palmitate turnover within 2 h of hydrocortisone infusion when insulin is clamped (16). Schade and associates (31) showed that when
cortisol secretion is blocked with metyrapone the plasma concentrations
of ketone bodies and free fatty acids are suppressed by 60 and 25%,
respectively. However, when cortisol is replaced to normal and high
levels, plasma concentrations of ketone bodies and free fatty acids
increase in a dose-response fashion. In agreement with these studies
(16, 31), our findings suggest that during exercise there is a direct
and positive relationship between lipid catabolism (suggested by
glycerol and
-hydroxybutyrate levels) and plasma cortisol levels.
Furthermore, a study using rodents reported that inhibition of the rise
of glucocorticoids significantly depressed plasma free fatty acids at
exhaustion (32). This study and ours suggest that glucocorticoids may
exert their effects within the time frame of a prolonged exercise bout.
During exercise, LC caused alterations in plasma insulin, growth
hormone, and epinephrine concentrations. Together, the lower insulin
and higher catecholamine and growth hormone concentrations would have
favored lipolysis. However, even in the presence of this
hormonal milieu, LC led to a decrease in the rate of change of glycerol
and
-hydroxybutyrate. The lower response of glycerol and
-hydroxybutyrate presumably reflects decreased lipolysis and
ketogenesis. Recently, Samra and associates (30) studied the effects of
cortisol on lipolysis in the subcutaneous adipose tissue of the
anterior abdominal wall by arteriovenous differences. The researchers
reported that, when the morning rise of cortisol was prevented by
metyrapone, the venoarterialized differences for nonesterified fatty
acid and glycerol were decreased. Moreover, the mechanism of action was
attributable, at least in part, to a decrease in lipoprotein lipase and
hormone-sensitive lipase action.
We found that the preexercise plasma alanine concentration was similar in both experimental conditions. However, during exercise the alanine levels were attenuated by ~25% under LC compared with NC. At rest, BCAA tended to be lower under LC than under NC (P = 0.07); the difference between both exercise trials became significant at 120 min. Interestingly, during the 2nd h of NC, plasma BCAA increased, whereas at the end of the 2nd h of LC the plasma concentration of these amino acids dropped slightly but significantly. Consistent with our findings, Garrel and associates (18), after infusing cortisol to increase cortisol levels to ~870 nmol/l, reported increases in the plasma leucine concentration and its rate of appearance and oxidation. These changes in leucine were prevented by a cortisol receptor antagonist (RU-486). Others have reported that when the morning rise of cortisol is prevented by administration of metyrapone and replacement of cortisol peripherally at a basal rate, the postprandrial alanine concentration is attenuated (14). These studies (14, 18) demonstrate that cortisol is involved in amino acid metabolism at rest. With respect to exercise, Viru and associates (37) evaluated the interaction of exercise-induced increases in alanine and glucocorticoids in adrenalectomized and normal rats. In normal rats a 3-h swim induced increases in alanine levels in blood, quadriceps muscle, and liver, whereas adrenalectomy blunted these effects. Similarly, the increase in muscle alanine aminotransferase activity was prevented by adrenalectomy. However, when glucocorticoids were replaced, the exercise-induced increases in alanine levels and alanine aminotransferase activity were restored. These results coupled with our findings support the view that glucocorticoids promote alanine supply and utilization during exercise.
With regard to our measurements of proteolysis, a change in the alanine
concentration could be due to a change in de novo alanine synthesis
from pyruvate, a decrease in alanine utilization, and/or an increase in
availability due to proteolysis. However, during exercise under LC, a
slightly higher (P = 0.12) blood
lactate concentration, a rough index of muscle glycolytic flux, argues against substantial differences in de novo synthesis from pyruvate. In
addition, the lower BCAA measured during LC than during NC could have
contributed to lower alanine levels (perhaps less nitrogen was
transferred from the BCAA to alanine because of a less active alanine
aminotransferase). A possible mechanism to explain the differences in
BCAA concentrations could be the cortisol induction of branched-chain
-ketoacid dehydrogenase, a key enzyme in BCAA catabolism (3). Taken
together, the lower alanine and BCAA concentrations found under LC
suggest an attenuation of proteolysis.
Importantly, despite modest differences in substrate concentrations, no differences were observed in calculated rates of substrate oxidation between the LC and NC trials. The present results suggest that, during exercise, carbohydrate and lipid oxidation (as measured by indirect calorimetry) are not affected by acute changes in cortisol levels. Indirect calorimetry is an overall whole body estimate of substrate oxidation, and we cannot rule out the potential for alterations in lipid metabolism that are not apparent at the level of whole body oxidation. There has been a paucity of data on the effects of cortisol on blood glucose and other substrates during exercise in humans. The effects of cortisol during exercise were by and large based on studies performed on animals (see Ref. 36 for a review). The present study suggests that, during exercise, 1) NC normally plays a demonstrable role by accelerating lipolysis, ketogenesis, and proteolysis; 2) LC drives glucoregulatory adjustments to maintain glucose homeostasis; 3) despite modest changes in substrate availability, LC does not alter whole body substrate utilization; and 4) in the short term, LC does not alter the ability to complete 2 h of moderate exercise.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
The authors are indebted to the volunteers; to Bill Law, Jr., and Juan F. Del Corral, who supplied the metyrapone; to Andra Cureton and John Vachon for help in the data collection; to Michael B. Zemel and Wayne Moore for the use of the gamma counter and the liquid scintillation counter; and to Rebecca Prosser for the rat livers used in the catecholamine assay.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This work was funded by a Reebok Research Grant on Human Performance and Injury Prevention. P. Del Corral was the recipient of the 1997 National Student Research Award from the American College of Sports Medicine.
This manuscript reflects work for the partial fulfillment of P. Del Corral's doctoral degree from The University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
The results in this manuscript were presented in part at the 44th Annual Meeting of the American College of Sports Medicine, Denver, CO, May 1997.
Address for reprint requests: P. Del Corral, 1914 Andy Holt Ave., Exercise Science Unit, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-2700.
Received 7 July 1997; accepted in final form 24 November 1997.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Axelrod, J.,
and
R. Tomchick.
Enzymatic O-methylations of epinephrine and other cathecols.
J. Biol. Chem.
233:
702-705,
1958
2.
Barwich, D.,
H. Hagele,
M. Weiss,
and
H. Weicker.
Hormonal and metabolic adjustments in patients with central Cushing's disease after adrenalectomy.
Int. J. Sports Med.
2:
220-227,
1981.
3.
Block, K. P.,
and
M. G. Buse.
Glucocorticoid regulation of muscle branched-chain amino acid metabolism.
Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.
22:
316-324,
1990[Medline].
4.
Boyle, P. J.,
and
P. E. Cryer.
Growth hormone, cortisol, or both are involved in defense against but are not critical to recovery from hypoglycemia.
Am. J. Physiol.
260 (Endocrinol. Metab. 23):
E395-E402,
1991
5.
Brandenberger, G.,
M. Follenius,
and
B. Hietter.
Feedback from meal-related peaks determines diurnal changes in cortisol response to exercise.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
54:
592-596,
1982[Abstract].
6.
Coggan, A. R.,
W. M. Kohrt,
R. J. Spina,
J. P. Kirwan,
D. M. Bier,
and
J. O. Holloszy.
Plasma glucose kinetics during exercise in subjects with high and low lactate thresholds.
J. Appl. Physiol.
73:
1873-1880,
1992
7.
Cryer, P. E.
Glucose counterregulation: prevention and correction of hypoglycemia in humans.
Am. J. Physiol.
264 (Endocrinol. Metab. 27):
E149-E155,
1993
8.
Czerwinski, S. M.,
and
R. C. Hickson.
Glucocorticoid receptor activation during exercise in muscle.
J. Appl. Physiol.
68:
1615-1620,
1990
9.
Davies, C. T. M.,
and
J. D. Few.
Effects of exercise on adrenocortical function.
J. Appl. Physiol.
35:
887-891,
1973
10.
De Feo, P.,
G. Perrielo,
E. Torlone,
M. M. Ventura,
C. Fanelli,
F. Santeusanio,
P. Brunetti,
J. E. Gerich,
and
G. B. Bolli.
Contribution of cortisol to glucose counterregulation in humans.
Am. J. Physiol.
257 (Endocrinol. Metab. 20):
E35-E42,
1989
11.
De Feo, P.,
G. Perriello,
M. M. Ventura,
P. Brunetti,
F. Santeusanio,
J. E. Gerich,
and
G. B. Bolli.
The pancreatic-adrenocortical-pituitary clamp technique for study of counterregulation in humans.
Am. J. Physiol.
252 (Endocrinol. Metab. 15):
E565-E570,
1987
12.
Del Corral, P.,
A. D. Mahon,
G. E. Duncan,
C. A. Howe,
and
B. W. Craig.
The effect of exercise on serum and salivary cortisol in male children.
Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.
26:
1297-1301,
1994[Medline].
13.
De Sousa, M. J.,
M. S. Maguire,
C. M. Maresh,
W. J. Kraemer,
K. R. Rubin,
and
A. B. Loucks.
Adrenal activation and the prolactin response to exercise in eumenorrheic and amenorrheic runners.
J. Appl. Physiol.
70:
2378-2387,
1991
14.
Dinneen, S.,
A. Alzaid,
J. Miles,
and
R. Rizza.
Metabolic effect of the nocturnal rise in cortisol on carbohydrate metabolism in normal humans.
J. Clin. Invest.
92:
2283-2290,
1993.
15.
Dinneen, S.,
A. Alzaid,
J. Miles,
and
R. Rizza.
Effects of the nocturnal rise on cortisol on carbohydrate and fat metabolism in IDDM.
Am. J. Physiol.
268 (Endocrinol. Metab. 31):
E595-E603,
1995
16.
Divertie, G. D.,
M. D. Jensen,
and
J. M. Miles.
Stimulation of lipolysis in humans by physiological hypercortisolinemia.
Diabetes
40:
1228-1232,
1991[Abstract].
17.
Friedman, J. E.
Role of glucocorticoids in activation of hepatic PEPCK gene transcription during exercise.
Am. J. Physiol.
266 (Endocrinol. Metab. 29):
E560-E566,
1994
18.
Garrel, D. R.,
R. Moussali,
A. De Oliveira,
D. Lesiege,
and
F. Lariviere.
RU486 prevents the acute effects of cortisol on glucose and leucine metabolism.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
80:
379-385,
1995[Abstract].
19.
Gleeson, M.,
and
R. J. Maughan.
A simple enzymatic fluorometric method for the determination of branched-chain L-amino acids in microlitre volumes of plasma.
Clin. Chim. Acta
166:
163-169,
1987[Medline].
20.
Hirsch, I. B.,
J. C. Marker,
L. J. Smith,
R. J. Spina,
C. A. Parvin,
J. O. Holloszy,
and
P. E. Cryer.
Insulin and glucagon in the prevention of hypoglycemia during exercise in humans.
Am. J. Physiol.
260 (Endocrinol. Metab. 23):
E695-E704,
1991
21.
Hoelzer, D. R.,
G. P. Dalsky,
N. S. Schwartz,
W. E. Clutter,
S. D. Shah,
J. O. Holloszy,
and
P. Cryer.
Epinephrine is not critical to prevention of hypoglycemia during exercise in humans.
Am. J. Physiol.
251 (Endocrinol. Metab. 14):
E104-E110,
1986
22.
Jubiz, W.,
A. W. Meikle,
C. D. West,
and
F. H. Tyler.
Single-dose metyrapone test.
Arch. Intern. Med.
125:
472-474,
1970[Medline].
23.
Kanaley, J. A.,
R. A. Boileau,
J. M. Bahr,
J. E. Misner,
and
R. A. Nelson.
Cortisol levels during prolonged exercise: the influence of menstrual phase and menstrual status.
Int. J. Sports Med.
13:
332-336,
1992[Medline].
24.
Kjær, M.,
P. A. Farrell,
N. J. Christensen,
and
H. Galbo.
Increased epinephrine response and inaccurate glucoregulation in exercising athletes.
J. Appl. Physiol.
61:
1693-1700,
1986
25.
Lowry, O. H.,
and
J. V. Passonneau.
A Flexible System of Enzymatic Analysis. New York: Academic, 1974, p. 149-150.
26.
Marker, J. C.,
I. B. Hirsch,
L. J. Smith,
C. A. Parvin,
J. O. Hoslloszy,
and
P. E. Cryer.
Catecholamines in the prevention of hypoglycemia during exercise in humans.
Am. J. Physiol.
260 (Endocrinol. Metab. 23):
E705-E712,
1991
27.
McGuire, E. A. H.,
J. H. Helderman,
J. D. Tobin,
R. Andres,
and
M. Berman.
Effects of arterial versus venous sampling on analysis of glucose kinetics in man.
J. Appl. Physiol.
41:
565-573,
1976
28.
Mier, A.,
C. Laroche,
J. Wass,
and
M. Green.
Respiratory muscle weakness in Addison's disease.
Br. Med. J.
297:
457-458,
1988.
29.
Passon, P. G.,
and
J. D. Peuler.
A simplified radiometric assay for plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine.
Anal. Biochem.
51:
618-631,
1973[Medline].
30.
Samra, J. S.,
M. L. Clark,
S. M. Humphreys,
I. A. Macdonald,
D. R. Mathews,
and
K. N. Fryan.
Effects of morning rise in cortisol concentration on regulation of lipolysis in subcutaneous adipose tissue.
Am. J. Physiol.
271 (Endocrinol. Metab. 34):
E996-E1002,
1996
31.
Schade, D.,
R. Eaton,
and
J. Standerfer.
Modulation of basal ketone body concentration by cortisol in diabetic man.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
47:
519-528,
1978[Abstract].
32.
Sellers, T. L.,
A. W. Jaussi,
H. T. Yang,
R. W. Heninger,
and
W. W. Winder.
Effect of exercise-induced increase in glucocorticoids on endurance in the rat.
J. Appl. Physiol.
65:
173-178,
1988
33.
Sigal, R. J.,
S. Fisher,
J. B. Halter,
M. Vranic,
and
E. B. Marliss.
The roles of catecholamines in glucoregulation in intense exercise as defined by the islet cell clamp technique.
Diabetes
45:
148-156,
1996[Abstract].
34.
Staehelin, D.,
A. Labhart,
R. Froesch,
and
H. R. Kägi.
The effect of muscular exercise and hypoglycemia on the plasma level of 17-hydroxycorticosteroids in normal adults and in patients with adrenogenital syndrome.
Acta Endocrinol.
18:
521-529,
1955.
35.
Thuma, J. R.,
R. Gilders,
M. Verdum,
and
A. B. Loucks.
Circadian rhythm of cortisol confounds cortisol responses to exercise: implications for future research.
J. Appl. Physiol.
78:
1657-1664,
1995
36.
Viru, A.
Hormones in Muscular Activity. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 1985, vols. I and II.
37.
Viru, A.,
L. Litvinova,
M. Viru,
and
T. Smirnova.
Glucocorticoids in metabolic control during exercise: alanine metabolism.
J. Appl. Physiol.
76:
801-805,
1994
38.
Wasserman, D. H.
Regulation of glucose fluxes during exercise in the postabsorptive state.
Annu. Rev. Physiol.
57:
191-218,
1995[Medline].
39.
Williamson, D. H.,
and
J. Mellanby.
D-(
)-3-Hydroxybutyrate.
In: Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, edited by H. U. Bergmeyer. New York: Academic, 1974, vol. 4, p. 1836-1839.
40.
Zelinky, B. A.,
M. V. Vernigorodskaya,
V. S. Vernigorodsky,
L. V. Gamarnik,
and
A. V. Palamarchuck.
Assessment of the working capacity of patients with chronic corticoadrenal insufficiency.
Ter. Arkh.
59:
132-134,
1987. [In Russian]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. K. Dalsgaard, P. Ott, F. Dela, A. Juul, B. K. Pedersen, J. Warberg, J. Fahrenkrug, and N. H. Secher The CSF and arterial to internal jugular venous hormonal differences during exercise in humans Exp Physiol, May 1, 2004; 89(3): 271 - 277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Green, S. J. Croaker, and D. G. Rowbottom Carbohydrate supplementation and exercise-induced changes in T-lymphocyte function J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2003; 95(3): 1216 - 1223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |