Journal of Applied Physiology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 84: 1040-1047, 1998;
8750-7587/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Romero, P. V.
Right arrow Articles by Manresa, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Romero, P. V.
Right arrow Articles by Manresa, F.

Vol. 84, Issue 3, 1040-1047, March 1998

Parallel airways inhomogeneity and lung tissue mechanics in transition to constricted state in rabbits

P. V. Romero, B. Rodriguez, J. Lopez-Aguilar, and F. Manresa

Servei de Pneumologia i Unitat de Recerca Experimental, Ciutat Sanitaria i Universitaria de Bellvitge, 08907 L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

To investigate whether changes of tissue resistance (Rti) during methacholine (MCh)-induced constriction correspond to an intrinsic mechanism or are an artifact of increased airways inhomogeneity, rabbits were studied after exposure to air (n = 7) or 1.5 parts/million O3 (n = 6). Animals were anesthetized and mechanically ventilated. Tracheal flow and pressure (Ptr) and four alveolar capsule pressures (Pcap) were measured during 3 min after administration of an intrajugular bolus of 0.8 mg/ml MCh. By adjustment of the equation of motion [P(t) = E · V(t) + R · dV(t)/dt + P0] [where P(t), V(t), and dV(t)/dt are pressure, volume, and flow as a function of time, respectively, E is elastance, R is resistance, and P0 is end-expiratory pressure] to Ptr, lung resistance (RL) and dynamic elastance (EL) were determined breath by breath. Rti and airways resistance (Raw) were determined from Pcap in phase with rate of change of pulmonary expansion. Hysteresivity (eta ) was calculated. Parallel inhomogeneity was estimated from the coefficients of variation (CV) of every Pcap at end inspiration and end expiration. Increase in CV significantly lagged Rti, RL, and eta . A linear relationship between EL and Raw was observed. Our results suggest that changes in tissue mechanics during the transition to the constricted state are not artifactual.

tissue resistance; tissue constriction; alveolar capsules; ozone

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

RECENT STUDIES have shown that bronchoconstrictor agents induce a substantial increase in tissue resistance (Rti) in several species (15, 29, 23). Three main mechanisms have been invoked to induce changes in Rti after constrictor challenge (11, 21). The first is a pure airway effect in which heterogeneity of airways resistance (Raw) among parallel pathways produces ventilation inhomogeneity and therefore artifactual increases in Rti; the second is a direct constriction of contractile cells and smooth muscle in the parenchyma and in blood vessels; and the third is a secondary response driven by airways smooth muscle contraction in the lung periphery.

According to Fredberg et al. (6), in the absence of disease and gradients in pleural pressure, functional inhomogeneity of the lung arises from intrinsic nonuniformity of lung tissue properties, structural asymmetry of the airway tree, and the mechanical interactions of these features. The combination of inhomogeneities and substantial constriction could produce a nonuniform parallel distribution of ventilation time constants, which would further contribute to the frequency-dependent features of tissue mechanical properties (20). If the influence of these phenomena is ignored, the consequence is an artifactual overestimation of the degree of increase in Rti and hence hysteresivity (eta ) (21). Furthermore, several authors recently concluded that there is little change in tissue mechanical properties during bronchoconstriction and that most of the change could be attributed to an artifact of increased airways inhomogeneity (2).

To investigate whether in vivo changes in Rti correspond to an intrinsic mechanism, we have studied the transition from basal conditions to the constricted state in normal and highly heterogeneous rabbit lungs, in which four alveolar capsules in four different lobes were used to detect parallel inhomogeneities during intravenous methacholine (MCh) challenge. Our hypothesis is that, if the changes in Rti are an artifact of parallel inhomogeneities, the time course of the increase in Rti and the development of alveolar heterogeneity should be similar.

    METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Animal preparation. Thirteen New Zealand White male rabbits were included in this study. Six of them (weight 2.79 ± 0.53 kg, mean ± SD) were previously exposed to 1-1.5 parts/million ozone (O3 group) for 2 h in a controlled-ambiance chamber, with a laminar flow of 6 l/min, and were studied 18 h after the beginning of exposure. The other seven rabbits (weight 2.96 ± 0.38 kg) were exposed to air (air group) in the same conditions and were also studied 18 h later.

Experimental procedure. At the time of the study, animals were preanesthetized with diazepam (2 mg/kg) and anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium by slow infusion of 50-60 mg/kg in the marginal vein of the ear. Anesthesia was maintained by an additional hourly dose of 10% of the initial dose. After anesthesia was induced, the upper trachea was dissected and cut. A 3-cm-long Portex no. 4 cannula was inserted into the trachea and tightly bound. Through the anterior part of the tracheal cannula a narrow (90 P) polyethylene catheter was introduced for tracheal pressure (Ptr) measurement. Total length of this catheter was 10 cm, and it protruded 2 mm from the internal opening of the cannula to record Ptr. A jugular venous line was placed for fluid and drug administration. Rabbits were paralyzed with pancuronium (2 mg) and ventilated with a Siemens 900C constant-flow servo ventilator. A warming pad prevented cooling of the animal. Through an upper midline abdominal incision, the diaphragm was cut at the level of the xiphoid, and bilateral pneumothoraxes were introduced. The thorax was widely opened by a midline sternotomy and dissection of costal diaphragm insertions. Basal mechanical ventilation was set at a frequency of 60 breaths/min, a tidal volume (VT) of 5 ml/kg, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH2O, and a duty cycle ratio of 0.33.

Four alveolar capsules were glued to the pleural surface with cyanoacrylate (6). The capsules were placed in the anterior (ventral) part of the upper and lower lobes in both lungs. Through the central port of the capsule, two small shallow holes were made in the pleura, puncturing it gently to a depth of <0.8 mm with a sharp thin needle (21 gauge) to allow the capsule chamber to communicate with the underlying alveoli. A piezoresistive microtransducer was connected to the free port of the capsule by a short flexible thick-walled 5-cm tubing. Great care was taken to avoid any distortion or twisting of the pleura.

Tracheal flow (V) was measured by means of a pneumotachograph (Fleisch no. 00) connected to the tracheal tube. The total added dead space equaled 2.8 ml from the tracheal end to the ventilator Y connection. The pressure drop inside the pneumotachograph was measured by a differential pressure transducer (MicroSwitch 163PC01D36, Honeywell, Scarborough, ON, Canada) connected to the pressure ports by means of identical 5-cm-long tubes. The transducer response was previously tested to be symmetrical and linear.

The linear differential pressure transducer, which measured Ptr, and the linear piezoresistive microtransducers (Sensym 906 SX01DN, Sensymtronics, France), which measured capsule pressures (Pcap), were calibrated simultaneously, matching the signals to obtain the same amplitude. All signals (Ptr, Pcap, and V) were amplified, filtered at a cut-off frequency of 100 Hz (Urelab DS-II, Biostec, Begues, Spain), recorded by a 12-bit analog-to-digital converter (DT2810-A, Data Translation, Marlborough, MA), sampled at a rate of 200 Hz, and stored on an IBM-compatible computer.

Protocol. End-inspiratory breath-holding maneuvers were performed to test for leaks. The preparation was allowed to stabilize (~20 min), and afterward total lung inflation maneuvers (peak inspiratory pressure of 20-40 cmH2O) were performed twice so as to standardize lung volume history. Five minutes later, three baseline recordings (10-s duration each at PEEP of 5 cmH2O) were sampled 5 min apart to test the stability of the preparation. A continuous recording of 220 s was then performed. At the 30th s, 1 ml of physiological saline, warmed to 37°C, was injected in the jugular vein. Twenty minutes later, a second continuous recording of 220 s was performed. At the 30th s, a bolus of 0.8 mg/kg MCh in 1 ml of physiological saline, warmed to 37°C, was injected in the jugular vein. Five minutes before every recording, two total lung capacity maneuvers were performed to warrant identical volume histories. During the experiment, Ptr was continuously monitored.

Data analysis and calculations. Volume (V) was calculated by digital integration of the flow signal. From V, V, and Ptr signals, lung elastance (EL) and total lung resistance (RL) were calculated cycle by cycle by adjusting the equation of motion (26)
Ptr(<IT>t</IT>) = E<SC>l</SC> ⋅ V(<IT>t</IT>) + R<SC>l</SC> ⋅ [dV(<IT>t</IT>)/d<IT>t</IT>] + <IT>K</IT>
where K is a constant term reflecting PEEP and the error linked to the residuals of the least-squares adjustment method (12), t is time, and dV(t)/dt is flow as a function of time. Anadat software (RHT-Infodat, Montreal, Quebec, Canada) was used for this purpose.

The equation of motion was also adjusted to each Pcap and to the difference between Ptr and Pcap, Ptr - Pcap, according to the following set of equations
Pcap(<IT>t</IT>) = <IT>a<SUB>i</SUB></IT> ⋅ V(<IT>t</IT>) + <IT>b<SUB>i</SUB></IT> ⋅ (dV(<IT>t</IT>)/d<IT>t</IT>) + <IT>c<SUB>i</SUB></IT>
Ptr(<IT>t</IT>) − Pcap(<IT>t</IT>) = <IT>a</IT><SUP>′</SUP><SUB><IT>i</IT></SUB> ⋅ V(<IT>t</IT>) + <IT>b</IT><SUP>′</SUP><SUB><IT>i</IT></SUB> ⋅ [dV(<IT>t</IT>)/d<IT>t</IT>] + <IT>c</IT><SUP>′</SUP><SUB><IT>i</IT></SUB>
where the subscript i identifies the capsule. By definition, alveolar pressure (Palv) is the value of the average pressure responsible for the expansion of lung parenchyma defined by the V and V rates measured at the trachea. According to this basic principle, the following criteria were adopted to accept the value of a Pcap as representative of Palv: 1) the difference between ai and EL must be <10% of EL, and -0.1 · EL < a'i < 0.1 · EL; 2) the value of c must be equal to K, with a tolerance of ±5%; 3) the value of c' must not be significantly different from zero; and 4) curves should fit the model represented by the equation of motion, and therefore the coefficients of determination should be >0.9 and the coefficients of the equations must have a positive sign. Only those capsules meeting all these criteria throughout the experiment were accepted for tissue mechanics measurements. Pcap readings that did not meet the above criteria throughout the experiment were excluded from mechanical measurements but were used in the analysis of parallel inhomogeneity. Figure 1 shows the electrical analog corresponding to the monocompartmental model assumed by this analysis. From accepted capsules, Rti (total pressure difference between peripheral air space and pleural space in phase with flow and out of phase with volume) and Raw (total pressure difference between airway opening and distal air space in phase with flow) were calculated as the average of b and b', respectively. Figure 2 shows the typical morphology of the curves of V, V, Ptr, and Palv, at baseline and after MCh administration. The fit of the linear equation of motion to both pressures is superimposed.


View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Schematic diagram showing electrical analog of linear monocompartmental model used to determine mechanical parameters. dV/dt, change in volume over time; Ptr, tracheal pressure; Raw, airways resistance; Palv, alveolar pressure; Rti, tissue resistance; Eti, tissue elastance.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Typical tracings of flow, volume (Vol), Ptr, and Palv at baseline (A) and after intravenous methacholine (MCh) administration (B) in an air-exposed rabbit. Broken lines show fit of linear model to both pressures.

Parallel inhomogeneity was quantified through the sample coefficient of variation (CV) of the four Pcap, without exception. End-inspiratory and end-expiratory CV values (CVi and CVe, respectively) for every cycle were obtained. Temporal variations of CVi and CVe were taken as representative of the time course of interregional variability and dynamic hyperinflation, respectively. CV was also averaged for every cycle (CVmean).

Stress decomposition analysis. Fredberg and Stamenovic (7) and more recently Ludwig et al. (16) argued that dissipative and elastic processes are coupled at a fundamental level. This is the structural damping hypothesis. The presumption of such coupling leads to the consideration of a new attribute of organ-level dissipative behavior, called tissue eta , and also referred to as structural damping coefficient (7). According to this theory, the fractional change in Rti in response to neurohumoral or biophysical stimulation can be decomposed into the product of two distinct contributions, the change in eta  and the change in EL
<FR><NU>Rti</NU><DE>Rti<SUB>0</SUB></DE></FR> = <FR><NU>&eegr;</NU><DE>&eegr;<SUB>0</SUB></DE></FR> ⋅ <FR><NU>E<SC>l</SC></NU><DE>E<SC>l</SC><SUB>0</SUB></DE></FR>
where the subscript 0 denotes values in the control or basal state. The value for eta  was calculated according to the equation eta  = omega  · Rti/EL, where omega  is the angular frequency (7).

Statistics. To account for individual differences at the beginning of the pulmonary reaction, individual trends have been aligned taking RL as reference. Accordingly, MCh challenge trends were aligned to coincide at the point at which total RL increased. The value of RL was considered to increase significantly (z = 0.05) at a time (T0) at which it exceeded RLbasal + 1.64sigma basal, where RLbasal is the average of the values previous to MCh administration, and sigma basal is the SD for the same values. For graphical representations and group averaging, signals have been cut from 20 s before T0 to 180 s after T0. Saline trends have been aligned only according to the recorded time of the beginning of intravenous injection.

To compare different trends from the same population, a paired t was determined for every cycle. To evaluate the significance of the changes in an intragroup trend, t was calculated for the difference between average basal value and each cycle data, according to
<IT>t</IT> = <FR><NU>mean<SUB>basal</SUB> − value</NU><DE><IT>s</IT><SUB>D</SUB></DE></FR>
where basal is the average of predrug (or presaline), value is every trend value, and sD is the SE of the difference. In these cases, alpha  = 0.05 and nu  = n - 1 (nu  is degrees of freedom and n is no. of subjects in group). To compare trends belonging to different populations, Student's t-test for between means difference was applied. In these cases, alpha  = 0.05, and nu  = N1 + N2 - 2 (N is no. of cases, and subscripts 1 and 2 refer to 1st and 2nd group). For graphical purposes, the trend difference between two groups has been expressed as the significant mean difference at alpha  = 0.05, according to the law of Student-Fisher
<IT>t</IT><SUB>0.05,<IT>v</IT></SUB> = (&Dgr;<SUB>m,<IT>T</IT></SUB> − &dgr;<SUB><IT>T</IT></SUB>)/(<IT>s</IT><SUP>2</SUP><SUB>1,<IT>T</IT></SUB>/<IT>N</IT><SUB>1</SUB> − <IT>s</IT><SUP>2</SUP><SUB>2,<IT>T</IT> </SUB>/<IT>N</IT><SUB>2</SUB>)<SUP>1/2</SUP>
where &Dgr;<SUB>m,<IT>T</IT></SUB> is the between-groups difference at a time T, s21,T and s22,T are group 1 and 2 variances, respectively, at time T, and &dgr;<SUB><IT>T</IT></SUB> is a measure of the difference between means beyond the null hypothesis, once the minimal significant difference at alpha  = 0.05 has been subtracted from the total between means difference. &dgr;<SUB><IT>T</IT></SUB> is expressed as a percentage of the control (air group) value (delta %). Statistical analysis was performed by means of the SPSS statistical package.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

In 11 of 13 cases, the four Pcap values met the criteria of validity at the basal periods previous to saline and to MCh injections. In the other two cases (both in O3 group), only three valid Pcap could be obtained. We rejected the two "bad" Pcap, since we could not identify the cause of the failure. In all cases, at least one capsule permanently met the criteria of validity; so we were able to determine Rti for every animal and every trend.

Table 1 shows the average values of pulmonary mechanics and heterogeneity parameters in both groups at basal state. As expected, alveolar heterogeneity was significantly greater in the O3 group, and differences were statistically significant for all mechanical parameters except Raw, probably in relation to the high variability of this parameter in O3-exposed animals.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Comparison between O3- and air-exposed animals at basal state

As shown in Fig. 3, saline injection did not induce any significant change in the air group. However, it significantly increased CVi and CVe in the O3 group 42 and 25 s after saline injection, respectively, without noticeable changes in mechanical parameters. Increases of both CVi and CVe were significant with respect to the average basal value. Basal values of both heterogeneity parameters recovered before MCh injection. CVmean was lower than both and showed a similar time course (see Fig. 6).


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Time course of ventilatory inhomogeneity and tissue mechanical parameters after saline intrajugular injection in air-exposed (n = 7; A), and O3-exposed (n = 6; B) rabbits. Vertical line indicates time at which saline (Sal) infusion was initiated. CV, coefficients of variation of capsule pressures; solid line, end-inspiratory CV (CVi); dotted line, end-expiratory CV (CVe). EL, dynamic lung elastance. Bars represent SE. Only mean values are represented for both CV.

As shown in Fig. 4, RL and Rti increased after MCh injection in both groups. Changes were greater in O3-exposed than in air-exposed animals. The delta % peaked immediately after MCh injection, reflecting a faster increase of RL and Rti in the O3 group. It is interesting to note that delta %(Rti) rose before delta %(RL).


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Time course of total lung resistance (RL; A) and Rti (B) after MCh intrajugular injection in air-exposed (n = 7) and O3-exposed (n = 6) rabbits. Vertical dotted line indicates cycle before first significant increase in RL was noticed. delta %, Significant between-means difference at alpha  = 0.05 as a percentage of average value in air-exposed group. Bars represent SE.

Figure 5 shows the time course of alveolar heterogeneity parameters in both groups. In the air group, a significant increase in CVi was observed 10 s after the increase in RL, and CVe increased significantly as late as 54 s after the increase in RL. Initial changes were small, and a "substantial" increase was not observed until 1 min after the first change in RL. In the O3 group, alveolar heterogeneity developed earlier, as shown by the initial peak change in delta % of both variables. Comparison with Figs. 4 and 6 shows that, in the air group, there was a noticeable delay of Rti with respect to CVi, CVe, and CVmean. In our results, Raw changes also preceded changes in CV.


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Time course of ventilatory inhomogeneity parameters, in air-exposed (n = 7) and O3-exposed (n = 6) rabbits. A: CVe; B: CVi. Dotted line indicates cycle before first significant increase in RL was noticed. Bars represent SE.

Figure 6 shows the time course of the components of stress decomposition in air-exposed rabbits. The dissociation between hysteretic and elastic changes is evident, with hysteretic changes predominating during the early transition to the constricted state. For ease of reference, average trend values of CVi, CVe, and CVmean are represented, and a clear out-of-phase behavior between lung tissue hysteresis and both heterogeneity parameters can be observed.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Time course of dynamic elastance (EL/EL0) and hysteresivity (eta /eta 0) changes over basal values after MCh intrajugular injection in air-exposed rabbits (n = 7). Bottom: time course of ventilatory heterogeneity parameters (CV); dotted line, CVe; continuous line, CVi; dots, average CV by cycle (CVmean). Only mean values of CVi, CVe, and CVmean are represented. Vertical dotted line indicates cycle before first significant increase in RL was noticed.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The main finding of this study has been the delayed time course of parallel inhomogeneity changes in relation to changes in total or tissue resistances and hysteresivity. Alveolar capsules have served both for alveolar heterogeneity evaluation and the measurement of tissue mechanical properties. Alveolar heterogeneity has been estimated from all capsules, accepting that they reflect underlying subpleural pressure. By contrast, measurement of tissue mechanics has been performed only with those capsules that actually reflect alveolar pressure in phase with pulmonary expansion as measured at the trachea.

An intrinsic drawback of the alveolar-capsule method is that it samples only those units close to the pleura. The atypical distribution of path lengths from alveolus to airway opening of such units makes them especially susceptible to parallel inhomogeneities (9). Previous authors (1, 6, 32) have taken advantage of this anatomical arrangement to quantify alveolar heterogeneity from capsule pressures. Another problem is that the capsules are placed at the top of the lung, so that they do not see what happens in the dependent regions underneath. In a complementary set of experiments performed in six rabbits, capsules were placed in the top of 11 lower lobes and in the lower third of their corresponding diaphragmatic side. Tissue resistance showed no significant difference (paired t-test) when measured from top and bottom capsule pressure (mean difference ± SD: 0.339 ± 1.407 cmH2O · l-1 · s). Furthermore, in a single experiment after intravenous MCh administration, no lag between mechanical parameters, calculated from either top or bottom capsules, was observed; thus it seems that there was no preferential delivery of drug to the basal parts of the lung. An increase in alveolar closure in the dependent parts of the lung after MCh cannot be excluded, because no capsule was placed in the bottom part of the lung. Such dependent alveolar closure would be expected to influence lung tissue mechanical parameters either by increasing dynamic intrinsic PEEP or by increasing tidal ventilation to the nondependent parts of lung. Dynamic intrinsic PEEP (minimal Ptr - 0-flow Ptr) increased by only 0.98 ± 0.12 cmH2O (mean ± SD) in the air-exposed rabbits. Its time course lagged the increase in RL, Rti, and eta , showing a behavior similar to that of the heterogeneity parameters. Increase of VT does increase tissue resistance but has no effect on hysteresivity, in agreement with previous studies (7, 24). Therefore, although alveolar closure can influence the changes observed in constricted state, it is unlikely that they can explain the transitional changes in our experimental conditions.

To be confident that capsule pressure really does correspond to alveolar pressure, we have stated a number of criteria based on the following assumptions: first, we have assumed a standard linear model for lung mechanics; second, lung elastance is attributed to lung parenchyma; and third, air pressure is considered to equilibrate at end expiration in well-communicated air spaces. We have no doubt that some arguments can be raised against a rigid application of our assumptions. The margins of tolerance serve to smooth these criteria.

We have used two ways to determine the influence of parallel inhomogeneities on lung tissue mechanical properties: first, by analysis of the time changes of parallel inhomogeneities and mechanical parameters in a group of normal rabbits; and second, by comparison of this behavior with that observed in a group of rabbits having inhomogeneous lungs. Exposure to O3 has been used to induce lung inhomogeneities, because it is well tolerated and the preparation is stable. In agreement with previous pathological studies, mechanical changes in O3-exposed animals suggest peripheral damage and a significant degree of alveolar inhomogeneity (3).

A significant change in alveolar heterogeneity was observed from the 1st min after saline administration in O3-exposed but not in air-exposed rabbits. This change was noticed in both CVi and CVe and had no effect on lung tissue mechanics. The origin of the increase in alveolar heterogeneity could be related either to an inflammatory increase in vascular permeability, since peripheral inflammatory changes are usually present 18 h after acute O3 inhalation (24), or to a more rapid dissipation of the effect of volume history (previous inflations to total lung capacity) in the damaged parenchyma. Both CVi and CVe returned to basal values before MCh administration. It is generally accepted that the response of the lungs to the administration of a bronchoconstrictive agent is as follows: the smooth muscle in the airways constricts, reducing the airway diameters and increasing Raw. It has been reported in recent studies (15, 18, 23, 29, 30) that bronchoconstrictor agents induce a substantial increase in tissue resistance in several species. Some investigators (13, 17, 22, 28) believe that this tissue response is a secondary response driven by smooth muscle contraction in the lung periphery and a subsequent response manifesting airway-tissue interdependence. Other authors (10, 18, 29, 31) have postulated that smooth muscle in the parenchyma and in blood vessels may also constrict, additionally increasing Rti and tissue elastance (Eti). Constrictive processes occur in a markedly inhomogeneous manner throughout the lungs, often making it difficult to accurately infer their precise nature from individual capsule signals. This has led some authors to believe that there is no substantive tissue response and what actually occurs is that increased inhomogeneities in peripheral airway resistance produce an artifactual increase in Rti due to the nature of the measurement and subsequent analysis (2, 14, 21).

To a large extent, disagreement arises from the way alveolar capsules are used to identify tissue mechanical changes in the presence of substantial heterogeneities. Indeed, if we accept capsule pressure readings without prior conditions, smooth muscle constriction often leads to negative Rti, which is meaningless according to the laws of physics (4). This observation is induced by the violation of the assumptions behind the application of the equation of motion to lung mechanics.

A linear monocompartmental model has been used to calculate mechanical parameters by assuming that the global mechanical behavior of lung can be described by three integrative magnitudes (Fig. 1): EL, Raw, and Rti. This is a usual way of analyzing lung mechanical behavior, even in the presence of limited nonlinearities (4, 14, 17). It could be argued, however, that changes in the nonlinear behavior of lung tissue after MCh would increase Rti as an artifact of mathematical analysis. To test this possibility, we have used an independent approach to calculate Rti independently from linear behavior. According to previous authors (5, 9, 10), the in presence of nonlinearities, it is possible to define lung tissue resistance based on three unambiguous quantities, VT, omega , and hysteresis area (A): Rti' = (4 · A)/[pi · omega  · (VT)2]. Rti' is therefore defined as a dimensional parameter proportional to the amount of energy dissipation in the tissue. In Fig. 7, tissue resistance values obtained by both methods are plotted together during MCh challenge. Both measurements of Rti had a similar behavior regardless of the measurement method. The ratio Rti/Rti', an index of the amount of the error related to nonlinearities, did not vary after MCh administration. It can therefore be concluded that nonlinearities do not induce any overestimation of the increase in Rti.


View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Time course of Rti calculated by 2 different methods: Rti, from fit of equation of motion to Palv; Rti', from formula proposed by Hildebrandt. Means ± SE are shown. Open circles are average Rti/Rti', taken as an indicator of development of nonlinearities.

Some criticisms of the lung tissue constriction theory are based on the failure of input impedance data to show a substantial increase in extrapolated quasistatic Eti in rat lungs after MCh challenge (21). However, dose-dependent increases in lung static elastance during induced constriction have previously been documented in both dogs (19) and rabbits (27). It may therefore well be possible that, in agreement with the same critical authors (20), our ability to discover tissue changes is inversely related to the amount of alveolar heterogeneity.

Absence of changes in tissue mechanics after saline administration in O3-exposed rabbits is relevant due to the fact that parallel inhomogeneity is seen to increase significantly. Because the extent of this increase is relatively small, one can argue that the effect of ventilatory heterogeneity on lung tissue parameter estimation is a matter of intensity, as previously suggested by Lauzon et al. (14). If we assume that small changes in heterogeneity have no effect on Rti, instead of the immediate increase observed, we would not expect Rti to increase until ~50-60 s after MCh injection in air-exposed animals. Furthermore, a clear increase in alveolar heterogeneity is only observed after Rti has reached a maximum. According to the general assumption that causes must precede effects, parallel airways inhomogeneity is unlikely to be the cause of the increase of Rti, and even less so the increase of eta , at the initial phase of the constriction. Therefore the immediate increase in Rti in air-exposed animals should be due to physiological events other than parallel inhomogeneity.

In O3-exposed rabbits, the increase in total and tissue resistances, as well as ventilatory heterogeneity, was faster than in air-exposed animals. The different time pattern of Rti between O3- and air-exposed animals could be attributed to an earlier increase of parallel inhomogeneity in the most heterogeneous lungs, or possibly the faster increase in CVi and CVe in O3-exposed rabbits actually reflects the early failure of parenchymal mechanisms preventing alveolar inhomogeneity in damaged lungs.

After these considerations, a question still remains: What is the nature of this early tissue response? In Fig. 6, the dissociation between hysteretic and elastic changes is evident: hysteretic changes predominate during the early transition to the constricted state. A transitional uncoupling between Eti and eta  was previously observed by Salerno et al. (30), who concluded that tissue changes in which contractile elements are involved result in marked alterations in the coupling of conservative and dissipative processes in the lung, predominantly increasing eta . In contrast, smooth muscle contractions in lung periphery and the subsequent changes manifesting airway-tissue interaction would predominantly increase Eti, just as increasing lung volume causes a decrease in eta  despite an increase in Rti (29). In agreement with this statement, Fig. 8 shows the linear relationship between Eti and Raw changes during the transition to the constrictor state in air-exposed rabbits, evidence of the mechanical linking between pulmonary elasticity and bronchoconstriction. Our results agree with a previous study by Mitzner et al. (22), who found that, by perfusing the bronchial vessels with MCh, the increase in Raw was associated with a fall in dynamic compliance.


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Relationship between EL/EL0 and airways resistance (Raw/Raw0) during transition to constricted state in air-exposed rabbits. Values are expressed in relation to basal (prechallenge) values.

Alveolar heterogeneity is unlikely to affect hysteresivity during the transitional period to the constrictor state. Time course of changes in eta  and in CVi and CVe are too different, and eta  increases too early to invoke a causal effect of parallel inhomogeneities.

In conclusion, in homogeneous lungs, the lag between the increase in tissue resistance and hysteresivity on the one side and the increase in parallel airways inhomogeneity on the other suggests that there is a real, not artifactual, tissue reaction immediately after MCh intravenous infusion. In heterogeneous lungs, MCh induces a faster increase in parallel inhomogeneities, which are probably responsible for earlier mechanical changes. In homogeneous lungs, hysteresivity reflects intrinsic tissue changes, probably related to the activation of the contractile machinery in lung parenchyma, whereas dynamic elastance is related to airways reaction and reflects airways-tissue interdependence.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Authors thank Beverly Johnson for the editing work performed on the text.

    FOOTNOTES

This work was supported by Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias of Spain (FISS 92/0579, 95/0389). J. Lopez-Aguilar was supported by a Fundací August Pi i Sunyer Fellowship.

Address for reprint requests: P. V. Romero, Laboratorio de Función Pulmonar, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, c/o Feixa Llarga, 08907 L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.

Received 17 January 1997; accepted in final form 7 November 1997.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1.   Allen, J. L., J. J. Fredberg, D. H. Keefe, and I. D. Frantz III. Alveolar pressure magnitude and asynchrony during high frequency oscillations of excised rabbit lungs. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 132: 343-349, 1985[Medline].

2.   Bates, J. H. T., A.-M. Lauzon, G. S. Dechmann, G. N. Maksym, and T. F. Schuessler. Temporal dynamics of pulmonary response to intravenous histamine in dogs: effect of dose and lung volume. J. Appl. Physiol. 76: 616-626, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

3.   Castleman, W. L., D. L. Dungworth, L. W. Schwartz, and W. S. Tyler. Acute respiratory bronchiolitis: an ultrastructural and autoradiographic study of epithelial cell injury and renewal in rhesus monkeys exposed to ozone. Am. J. Pathol. 98: 811-840, 1980[Abstract].

4.   Fuller, S. D., and A. N. Freed. Partitioning of pulmonary function in rabbits during cholinergic stimulation. J. Appl. Physiol. 78: 1242-1249, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

5.   Fredberg, J. J., D. Bunk, E. Ingenito, and S. A. Shore. Tissue resistance and the contractile state of lung parenchyma. J. Appl. Physiol. 74: 1387-1397, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

6.   Fredberg, J. J., D. H. Keefe, G. M. Glass, R. G. Castile, and I. D. Frantz III. Alveolar pressure nonhomogeneity during small amplitude high-frequency oscillation. J. Appl. Physiol. 57: 788-800, 1984[Abstract/Free Full Text].

7.   Fredberg, J. J., and D. Stamenovic. On the imperfect elasticity of lung tissue. J. Appl. Physiol. 67: 2408-2419, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

8.   Hildebrandt, J. Pressure-volume data of cat lung interpreted by a plastoelastic, linear viscoelastic model. J. Appl. Physiol. 28: 365-372, 1970[Free Full Text].

9.   Horsfield, K. W., W. Kemp, and S. Phillips. An asymmetric model of the airways of the dog lung. J. Appl. Physiol. 52: 21-26, 1982[Abstract/Free Full Text].

10.   Ingenito, E. P., B. Davison, and J. J. Fredberg. Tissue resistance in the guinea pig at baseline and during methacholine constriction. J. Appl. Physiol. 75: 2541-2548, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

11.   Kimmel, E., M. Seri, and J. J. Fredberg. Lung tissue resistance and hysteretic moduli of lung parenchyma. J. Appl. Physiol. 79: 461-466, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

12.   Lauzon, A. M., and J. H. T. Bates. Estimation of time-varying respiratory mechanical parameters by recursive least squares. J. Appl. Physiol. 71: 1159-1165, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

13.   Lauzon, A.-M., G. Dechman, and J. H. T. Bates. Time course of respiratory mechanics during histamine challenge in the dog. J. Appl. Physiol. 73: 2643-2647, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

14.   Lauzon, A.-M., G. Dechman, and J. H. T. Bates. On the use of alveolar capsule technique to study bronchoconstriction. Respir. Physiol. 99: 139-146, 1995[Medline].

15.   Ludwig, M. S., I. Dreshaj, J. Solway, A. Muñoz, and R. H. Ingram, Jr. Partitioning of pulmonary resistance during constriction in the dog: effects of volume history. J. Appl. Physiol. 62: 807-815, 1987[Abstract/Free Full Text].

16.   Ludwig, M. S., F. M. Robatto, S. Simard, D. Stamenovic, and J. J. Fredberg. Lung tissue resistance during contractile stimulation: structural damping decomposition. J. Appl. Physiol. 72: 1332-1337, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

17.   Ludwig, M. S., F. M. Robatto, P. D. Sly, M. Browman, J. H. T. Bates, and P. V. Romero. Histamine-induced constriction of canine peripheral lung: an airway or tissue response? J. Appl. Physiol. 71: 287-293, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

18.   Ludwig, M. S., P. V. Romero, and J. H. T. Bates. A comparison of the dose-response behavior of canine airways and parenchyma. J. Appl. Physiol. 67: 1220-1225, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

19.   Ludwig, M. S., P. V. Romero, P. D. Sly, J. J. Fredberg, and J. H. T. Bates. Interpretation of interrupter resistance after histamine-induced constriction in the dog. J. Appl. Physiol. 68: 1651-1656, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].

20.   Lutchen, K. R., J. L. Greenstein, and B. Suki. How inhomogeneities and airway walls affect frequency dependence and separation of airway and tissue properties. J. Appl. Physiol. 80: 1696-1707, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

21.   Lutchen, K. R., Z. Hantos, F. Peták, A. Adamicza, and B. Suki. Airway inhomogeneities contribute to apparent lung tissue mechanics during constriction. J. Appl. Physiol. 80: 1841-1849, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

22.   Mitzner, W., S. Blosser, D. Yager, and E. Wagner. Effect of bronchial smooth muscle contraction on lung compliance. J. Appl. Physiol. 72: 158-167, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

23.   Nagase, T., M. Lei, F. M. Robatto, D. H. Eidelmann, and M. S. Ludwig. Tissue viscance during methacholine-induced constriction in rabbit lungs: morphological-physiological correlations. J. Appl. Physiol. 73: 1900-1907, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

24.   Pino, M. V., J. R. Levin, M. Y. Stovall, and M. H. Dallas. Pulmonary inflammation and epithelial injury in response to acute ozone exposure in the rat. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 112: 64-72, 1992[Medline].

25.   Robatto, F. M., P. V. Romero, J. J. Fredberg, and M. S. Ludwig. Contribution of quasistatic tissue hysteresis to the dynamic alveolar pressure-volume loop. J. Appl. Physiol. 70: 708-714, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

26.   Rodarte, J. R., and K. Rehder. Dynamics of respiration. In: Handbook of Physiology. The Respiratory System. Mechanics of Breathing. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1986, sect. 3, vol. III, pt. 1, chapt. 10, p. 131-144.

27.   Romero, P. V., J. Lopez-Aguilar, and W. A. Zin. Relationship between respiratory mechanics and postinspiratory muscle activity during muscarinic challenge in rabbits. Respir. Physiol. 106: 285-292, 1996[Medline].

28.   Romero, P. V., and M. S. Ludwig. Maximal methacholine-induced constriction in rabbit lung: interactions between airways and tissue? J. Appl. Physiol. 70: 1044-1050, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

29.   Romero, P. V., F. M. Robatto, S. Simard, and M. S. Ludwig. Lung tissue behavior during methacholine challenge in rabbits in vivo. J. Appl. Physiol. 73: 207-212, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

30.   Salerno, F. G., A. Moretto, M. Dallaire, and M. S. Ludwig. How mode of stimulus affects the relative contribution of hysteresivity to changes in lung tissue resistance. J. Appl. Physiol. 78: 282-287, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

31.   Sly, P. D., and C. J. Lanteri. Differential responses of the airways and pulmonary tissues to inhaled histamine in young dogs. J. Appl. Physiol. 68: 1562-1567, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].

32.   Warner, D. O. Alveolar pressure inhomogeneity during low-frequency oscillation of excised canine lobes. J. Appl. Physiol. 69: 155-161, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].


JAP 84(3):1040-1047
0161-7567/98 $5.00 Copyright © 1998 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
P. Angeli, C. M. Prado, D. G. Xisto, P. L. Silva, C. P. Passaro, H. D. Nakazato, E. A. Leick-Maldonado, M. A. Martins, P. R. M. Rocco, and I. F. L. C. Tiberio
Effects of chronic L-NAME treatment lung tissue mechanics, eosinophilic and extracellular matrix responses induced by chronic pulmonary inflammation
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, June 1, 2008; 294(6): L1197 - L1205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
P. V. Romero, W. A. Zin, and J. Lopez-Aguilar
Frequency characteristics of lung tissue strip during passive stretch and induced pneumoconstriction
J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2001; 91(2): 882 - 890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Romero, P. V.
Right arrow Articles by Manresa, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Romero, P. V.
Right arrow Articles by Manresa, F.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online