Department of Physiology, Northeastern Ohio Universities College
of Medicine, Rootstown, Ohio 44272
 |
INTRODUCTION |
NEUROPEPTIDE Y (NPY), a sympathetic cotransmitter,
constricts systemic blood vessels (8, 16, 21, 23, 29, 30) and
potentiates the vasoconstrictor effects of norepinephrine (NE) and
other vasoactive agents (8, 9, 19, 28, 30). These actions are well
recognized for the systemic circulation, but the effects of NPY on the
pulmonary circuit are not as well understood. Although isolated pig
pulmonary arteries (18) and rabbit pulmonary veins (12) contract in
response to NPY, the role that such changes in vascular tone might play
in altering hemodynamics of the intact lung is not known. Accordingly,
in this study, we determined whether NPY increased vascular resistance and altered the arteriovenous resistance distribution in the isolated perfused rabbit lung. We chose the rabbit for this analysis because of
previous reports indicating that its isolated pulmonary vessels are
responsive to NPY (12, 27).
We found that NPY produced a dose-dependent increase in pulmonary
vascular resistance that was characterized by increases in resistance
on both the arterial and venous sides of the pulmonary circulation.
Accordingly, we conducted two additional sets of experiments to more
fully characterize and understand the significance of this response.
Because Wahlestadt et al. (27) have reported that NPY and NE
reciprocally potentiate the other's vasoactive effects when
administered to isolated rabbit pulmonary arteries, we determined
whether NPY produced a greater degree of pulmonary vasoconstriction in
the presence of NE. Finally, to determine the physiological relevance
of circulating NPY as a pulmonary vasoactive agent, we measured
NPY-like immunoreactivity (NPY-LI) in anesthetized rabbits after
massively activating the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) with an
intracisternal injection of veratrine (24, 25) and compared these
concentrations with those shown to produce pulmonary vasoconstriction
in the perfused rabbit lung.
 |
METHODS |
Isolated perfused rabbit lung
preparation. Fourteen New Zealand White rabbits
[3.0 ± 0.4 (SD) kg] were anesthetized with an intramuscular injection of a mixture of zylazine (5.2 mg/kg; Butler, Columbus, OH), chlorpromazine HCl (2.2 mg/kg, Rugby Laboratories, Rockville Center, NY), and ketamine HCl (26.1 mg/kg, Fort Dodge Laboratories, Fort Dodge, IA). The esophagus was ligated and cut at the
level of the fifth cervical vertebra to prevent aspiration of stomach
contents into the lungs. Heparin sodium (5,000 U; US Amersham Life
Sciences, Arlington Heights, IL) and dextran (20 ml; Abbott
Laboratories, North Chicago, IL) were administered through a
polyethylene catheter placed in the right carotid artery. Approximately
100 ml of arterial blood were drawn, and the chest was opened. A
cannula was inserted into the main pulmonary artery, an opening was
made in the left atrial appendage, and perfusion of the lungs (at
~25-50 ml/min) was begun immediately (Masterflex pump,
Cole-Parmer Instruments, Niles, IL) with an artificial perfusate containing (in mM) 89.0 sodium chloride, 5.0 potassium chloride, 2.0 calcium chloride, 1.0 magnesium sulfate, 24.0 sodium bicarbonate, 1.0 sodium phosphate, 20.0 sodium acetate, 10.0 dextrose, and 6 g/dl bovine
serum albumin. The first 150-200 ml of perfusate were used to
flush the blood from the pulmonary vessels and discarded. The left
atrium and trachea were then cannulated, and the lungs were removed
from the animal. As recirculation of the perfusate was begun, the
collected blood (~100 ml) was mixed with the perfusate (~50 ml) to
produce an approximate circulating volume of 150 ml having an average
hematocrit of 16.0 ± 1.6 (SD)%. Erythrocytes were included in the
perfusate because of observations suggesting that erythrocytes may help
to maintain normal vascular permeability in isolated lungs (22). The
perfusate was pumped from a reservoir, through a heat exchanger (to
maintain blood temperature at 37°C), into the pulmonary artery, out
the left atrium, and back into the reservoir. All tubing was Tygon
(Cole-Parmer, Niles, IL). The lungs were covered with plastic wrap to
prevent drying.
Pulmonary capillary pressure (Ppc) was determined by using
the double-occlusion technique of Dawson et al. (5). Baseline pulmonary
arterial pressure (Ppa) and Ppc were 12.7 ± 2.6 and 6.3 ± 2.0 mmHg, respectively. Pulmonary venous pressure (Ppv; 2.5 ± 1.0 mmHg)
was set by adjusting the height of the reservoir. The average flow rate
was 193 ± 32 ml/min. Because flow remained constant throughout each
experiment, the arterial pressure gradient (Ppa
Ppc) and venous
pressure gradient (Ppc
Ppv) represent estimates of arterial and
venous resistance, respectively.
The lungs were ventilated with a gas mixture of 15%
O2-5%
CO2-80%
N2, by using a Harvard
large-animal ventilator that had been modified to inflate the lungs to
a constant end-inspiratory pressure [10.8 ± 1.8 (SD)
mmHg]. This was accomplished by placing a water overflow system
in the inspiratory line to vent any excess tidal volume delivered by
the ventilator to the atmosphere. End-expiratory pressure (0.6 ± 0.4 mmHg) was also set by a water-overflow system. Ventilatory
frequency was 20-24 breaths/min. Control blood gas values were
PO2 = 118 ± 21 (SD)
Torr, PCO2 = 41 ± 4 Torr, and pH = 7.399 (range, 7.341-7.461).
Effect of NPY on pulmonary
hemodynamics. In six lungs, porcine NPY (Bachem
California, Torrence, CA) was administered in increasing doses to
produce calculated initial perfusate NPY concentrations ranging from
10
10 to
10
7 M. Ppa and Ppc were
determined under control conditions and after Ppa attained a
steady-state value after each drug dose. Successive NPY doses were
administered at intervals averaging 13 ± 3 (SD) min. At NPY doses
that significantly increased Ppa
(10
8 and
10
7 M), Ppa did not recover
and remained elevated during this interval. Accordingly, the
10
7 M dose was
administered at a time when Ppa was still elevated from the
10
8 M dose. In two of these
lungs, papaverine HCl (30 mg; Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN), a smooth
muscle relaxant, was administered after the highest dose of NPY to
determine whether the increase in Ppa was actively mediated. In two
additional lungs, equivalent volumes of saline were administered (at 10 ± 2-min intervals) to serve as time controls.
NPY-NE interactions. In six lungs,
designated as NE+NPY, we determined the effects of an infusion of NE
bitartrate (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO; 140 pg base/min) on the NPY
dose-Ppa relationship. The NE infusion was started 30 min before
administration of the lowest dose of NPY and continued while the
dose-response curve was being determined. In one lung, papaverine was
administered after the 10
8
M dose. In one experiment, perfusate samples (3 ml) were collected under baseline conditions, and at 30 and 60 min during NE infusion, for
the determination of perfusate NE concentration by high-performance liquid chromatography as previously described (15).
Plasma NPY-LI after massive SNS
activation. Five rabbits (2.9 ± 0.2 kg) were
anesthetized with thiamylal sodium (18 mg/kg; Biotal, Boehringer
Ingelheim Animal Health, St. Joseph, MO) in an ear vein. A tracheal
cannula was inserted, and the lungs were mechanically ventilated with a
gas mixture of 40% O2-60%
N2. A polypropylene catheter was
placed in the right carotid artery for administration of additional
anesthetic (
-chloralose, 50 mg/kg, Sigma Chemical) and for
measurement of arterial pressure. Control blood gas values were
PO2 = 157 ± 45 Torr,
PCO2 = 31 ± 11 Torr, and pH = 7.366 (range, 7.310-7.425).
After the animal had stabilized, 0.4 ml of veratrine (800 µg/ml;
Sigma Chemical) was injected into the cisterna magna to massively activate the SNS. Veratrine was used in these experiments because it
produces an extreme degree of centrally mediated SNS activation that is
characterized in the rabbit by the development of large increases in
blood pressure and plasma NE concentration (24, 25). For determination
of plasma NPY-LI, arterial blood samples (3 ml) were drawn under
baseline conditions, when arterial pressure had reached its highest
value after veratrine administration (5-10 min after injection)
and at 30-min intervals for 120 min. One animal died 90 min after
veratrine administration. NPY-LI was determined by radioimmunoassay
(Peninsula Laboratories, Belmont, CA), as previously described (14),
with antiserum raised against porcine NPY. The antiserum had 100%
cross-reactivity with porcine NPY and <0.1% cross-reactivity with
other peptides of similar structure. The assay detection limit was 10 pg/tube. Extraction recoveries from rabbit plasma spiked with either
125I-labeled NPY or porcine NPY
were 70-80%.
Statistical analysis. The data were
analyzed by using a one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance,
followed by the use of a Student-Newman-Keuls test to determine
significant differences from control values.
 |
RESULTS |
Figure 1 is a representative pressure
tracing showing the increase in Ppa produced by
10
7 M NPY. Figure 1 also
shows that the administration of papaverine resulted in an initial
rapid fall in Ppa, which was followed by a more gradual reduction. The
dose-response relationship between the calculated perfusate NPY
concentration and Ppa for five of the six lungs administered NPY is
shown in Fig. 2. (The sixth lung was not included in the
mean, because an extreme degree of pulmonary hypertension developed
after the 10
7 M dose that
was not characteristic of the response observed in the remaining lungs
in the group. In this lung, Ppa increased to 115 mmHg, and edema fluid
appeared in the airway.) In the remaining five lungs, significant
increases in Ppa (P < 0.05) occurred
after the 10
8 M (44 ± 14%) and 10
7 M (136 ± 48%) doses. No edema fluid was observed in these lungs. In the two
lungs in which papaverine was administered after the 10
7 M NPY dose, Ppa fell
from 40.5 to 9.0 mmHg (Ppa before any NPY administration was 9.5 mmHg)
and from 23.5 to 12.0 mmHg (baseline Ppa was 11.2 mmHg; Fig. 1),
respectively. Saline administration produced no increases in Ppa in the
two lungs in which saline rather than NPY was administered.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Representative pulmonary arterial (Ppa) and venous (Ppv) pressure
tracings after administration of
10 7 M neuropeptide Y (NPY).
Double-occlusion capillary pressure was obtained by simultaneously
clamping arterial and venous perfusion lines. Under these conditions,
Ppa falls and Ppv increases until a common equilibrium pressure
(double-occlusion capillary pressure) is reached. Administration of
papaverine caused Ppa to fall in a biphasic manner.
|
|
Changes in the pulmonary vascular resistance distribution after NPY
administration are shown in Fig.
3. The highest NPY dose (10
7 M) significantly
increased both the arterial and venous pressure gradients of the lung,
with 78 ± 4% of the increased resistance occurring on the arterial
side. As a result of the increase in venous tone, Ppc increased from
5.8 ± 0.9 to 9.4 ± 1.0 mmHg (73 ± 30%,
P < 0.05) at the highest NPY dose
(Fig. 2).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effect of NPY on Ppa and pulmonary capillary pressure (Ppc) of isolated
perfused rabbit lung. Data are means ± SE;
n = 5 lungs. * P < 0.05 from control
value.
|
|

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Effect of NPY on pulmonary arterial and venous pressure gradients. Data
are from same experiments depicted in Fig. 2 and are means ± SE;
n = 5 lungs.
* P < 0.05 from control
value.
|
|
No significant changes in Ppa were observed after NE administration
(Fig. 4). In the presence of NE, however,
NPY administration produced extreme increases in Ppa at the
10
8 and
10
7 M doses (Fig. 4). In
three of these lungs, pulmonary edema developed after the
10
8 M dose, so no
additional NPY was administered. In one of these lungs, we administered
papaverine after the 10
8 M
dose, and Ppa fell from 54 to 12.2 mmHg (baseline Ppa was 12.9 mmHg).
Edema was observed in the remaining three lungs after the highest
(10
7 M) dose of NPY. Figure
5 shows that an increase in the pulmonary arterial pressure gradient was primarily responsible for the increased Ppa produced by NPY+NE. In these experiments, Ppc increased from a
baseline value of 7.4 ± 0.8 (SE) mmHg to only 10.7 ± 1.3 mmHg (P < 0.05) at
10
8 M NPY and to 12.9 ± 1.7 mmHg (P < 0.05) at
10
7 M. The average increase
(100 ± 39%) in Ppc at the
10
7 M dose in the presence
of NE was comparable to that produced by
10
7 M NPY alone (73 ± 30%). No significant increases in Ppc were produced by lower doses of
NPY in the presence of NE. In the one experiment in which perfusate NE
was measured during the NE infusion, NE was 9,260 pg/ml after 30 min of
infusion (the time corresponding to the moment when we began to
administer NPY to the lung) and was 19,201 pg/ml at 60 min (after the
highest dose of NPY).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effect of NPY on Ppa when administered in presence of norepinephrine
(NE) (n= 6, except for
10 7 M, where
n = 3 lungs. See text for
explanation). Data for NPY alone are those depicted in Fig. 2. Data are
means ± SE. * P < 0.05 compared with respective control values.
|
|

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effect of NPY (n = 5 lungs) and NPY+NE
(n = 6 lungs, except for
10 7 M, where
n = 3 lungs) on pulmonary arterial and
venous pressure gradients. Data are means ± SE.
* P < 0.05 from control.
|
|
The baseline plasma NPY-LI [74 ± 10 (SE) pM] observed
in the intact rabbits was similar to that reported by others (13). Veratrine administration transiently increased arterial pressure by 155 ± 28% (Fig. 6). By 30-60 min
after veratrine administration, NPY-LI was increased an average 57%
[111 ± 11 (SE) pM] over baseline values (Fig. 6). After
this time, NPY-LI slowly decreased but remained elevated for the
remainder of the experiment.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effect of massive sympathetic nervous system activation on arterial
pressure and plasma NPY-like immunoreactivity (NPY-LI). Data are means ± SE; n = 5 rabbits.
* P < 0.05 from control
value.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We found that NPY at concentrations of
10
8 and
10
7 M increased Ppa in the
isolated perfused rabbit lung (Figs. 1 and 2). Because the lungs were
perfused at constant flow and outflow pressure, the increase in Ppa
represented an increase in vascular resistance. The ability of
papaverine, a smooth muscle relaxant, to reduce the increased pressure
indicated that the increase in vascular resistance was actively
mediated (Fig. 1). Lower concentrations of NPY had no significant
effect on pulmonary hemodynamics (Fig. 2). In contrast to our results,
Delaunois et al. (6) observed no increases in vascular tone at a
perfusate NPY concentration of
10
8 M in the isolated
buffer-perfused rabbit lung. The reason for this disparity is not clear
but may relate to technical differences.
At the 10
7 M NPY
concentration, both pulmonary arterial and venous resistances were
significantly increased (Fig. 3). The increase in venous resistance is
consistent with observations of Kinsey and Russell (12), who found that
NPY caused isolated rabbit pulmonary veins to constrict. In contrast,
Wahlestedt et al. (27) found that the rabbit pulmonary artery either
contracted weakly or not at all, even after being exposed to micromolar
NPY concentrations. The reason for the differences between the intact
lung and isolated pulmonary artery response to NPY is unknown but could
relate to the possibility that the increase in arterial resistance
observed in the intact lung might have been produced by constriction of more distal portions of the pulmonary artery or by arterioles that were
not evaluated in the isolated vessel study of Wahlestedt et al. (27).
This possibility is suggested by observations of Madden et al. (17),
who found that isolated small (<300 µm diameter) feline pulmonary
arteries constricted in response to hypoxia, whereas larger (>500
µm) arteries did not exhibit significant hypoxic constriction.
Although 10
7 M NPY produced
both arterial and venous constriction in the perfused rabbit lung, the
preponderant effect was on the arterial side of the circulation. This
change in resistance distribution could have been the result of a
heterogeneous distribution of NPY receptors in the arterial and venous
sides of the pulmonary circulation, possible differences in the
transmission process between receptor and vascular smooth muscle, or
differences in the amount of and/or the ability of the vascular
smooth muscle of the pulmonary arteries and veins to increase the
resistance of their respective vascular segments. Although there
appears to be no available information regarding the first two
possibilities, there is evidence to support the third. In this regard,
the rabbit pulmonary vein contains less vascular smooth muscle than the
pulmonary artery (2), and 80% of the increase in vascular resistance that occurs in perfused rabbit lungs after KCl administration has been
reported to be located in the large and small pulmonary arteries (3).
In the latter study, the degree of vasoconstriction produced by KCl was
considered to be indicative of the quantity of functional smooth
muscle. Although the increase in venous resistance was relatively
smaller than the increase in arterial resistance, the increase in
venous tone resulted in a 73% increase in capillary pressure at the
10
7 M NPY dose (Fig. 4).
NPY and NE have been found to potentiate one another's vasoconstrictor
effects in many vascular beds (7, 9, 27, 30). In the isolated rabbit
pulmonary artery, Wahlestadt et al. (27) observed that NE and NPY
reciprocally potentiated the degree of constriction caused by the other
vasoactive agonist. The intact rabbit lung appears to behave in a
similar fashion. The administration of NPY in the presence of NE
produced severe pulmonary hypertension (Fig. 4) that resulted primarily
from profound increases in arterial resistance (Fig. 5). In one NPY+NE
experiment in which papaverine was administered, Ppa returned to
baseline values, indicating that the extreme increases in Ppa were
actively mediated and not a consequence of the edema. Although these
data demonstrate that pulmonary vasoconstriction can produce extreme
increases in Ppa in the isolated pump-perfused rabbit lung, it is not
likely that such high pressures would develop in the intact rabbit,
because right heart failure would likely intervene.
In contrast to the above results in the isolated rabbit lung, NPY (in
the same range of doses) does not produce pulmonary vasoconstriction in
either the intact anesthetized dog or cat or in isolated perfused lungs
from these species (4, 14, 20). Additionally, the infusion of NE into
the blood perfusing the isolated canine left lower lung lobe does not
alter the NPY dose-Ppa relationship (14). These observations suggest
that species differences may exist in the capacity of the pulmonary vasculature to respond to NPY.
All six lung preparations that received NE and NPY and the one lung
that developed severe pulmonary hypertension after the 10
7 M dose of NPY became
edematous. These observations suggest that the edema was related to the
extreme degree of pulmonary hypertension that developed. The basis for
a hydrostatic explanation for the edema is not readily apparent,
however, because only relatively small increases in Ppc occurred after
NPY administration. Because fluid has been found to also leave the
pulmonary vasculature from extraalveolar vessels upstream of (as well
as downstream from) the capillaries, it is possible that the edema
resulted from fluid filtration occurring from sites upstream of the
increased arterial resistance (1). Additionally, extremely high
pressures in the pulmonary arteries might have been transmitted to some
pulmonary capillaries if the pattern of vasoconstriction was not
uniform throughout the lung. Alternatively, it is possible that an
increase in vascular permeability might have played a role in producing the edema. In isolated perfused rat lungs,
10
7 M NPY has been found to
increase the capillary filtration coefficient (11), and lower
concentrations (10
10 M)
have been observed to increase the leakage of carbon particles from the
vasculature (10). In the rabbit lung,
10
8 M NPY has been
found to have no effect on the capillary filtration coefficient, but higher NPY concentrations were not evaluated (6).
Although massive sympathetic activation produced by the intracisternal
administration of veratrine significantly increased plasma NPY-LI in
intact rabbits in our study, the magnitude of the increase (57%) was
relatively modest (to
~10
10 M, Fig. 6) and was
significantly less than the increase we previously observed in dogs
(431%) after veratrine administration (14). Thus, in the rabbit,
massive SNS activation produces increases in circulating NPY-LI that
are two orders of magnitude less than that required to produce a
significant degree of pulmonary vasoconstriction in the isolated
perfused rabbit lung. Moreover, in the presence of plasma NE
concentrations of the same order of magnitude as those observed after
massive SNS activation in the rabbit (24), the observed increases in
NPY-LI would be expected to produce only minimal increases in Ppa (Fig.
4). These data suggest that circulating NPY is not likely to produce
pulmonary vasoconstriction after SNS activation, even in the presence
of concentrations of circulating NE that may occur under these
conditions. This conclusion is predicated, however, on the assumption
that the sensitivity of the pulmonary vasculature to NPY is similar in
the isolated perfused and in situ rabbit lung. Although we do not know
whether the isolated perfusion condition alters pulmonary
vasoreactivity from that which would be observed in the intact rabbit,
the artificial perfusion conditions should be kept in mind when
considering these results. Finally, it is conceivable that neurally
released NPY might increase pulmonary vascular tone if NPY and NE
concentrations are higher at neuronal release sites (8, 26).
In summary, we have shown that NPY produces pulmonary vasoconstriction
in the isolated perfused rabbit lung that results from increases in
both arterial and venous resistance. Although the increase in arterial
resistance was larger than that occurring on the venous side, the
observed degree of pulmonary venoconstriction was sufficient to
increase Ppc. The administration of NPY in the presence of NE
potentiated the vasoconstriction caused by NPY, and at higher NPY
concentrations resulted in severe pulmonary hypertension and edema.
The authors are grateful for the excellent technical assistance of
Cheryl Hodnichak and Kay Maender.
This work was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Grant HL-31070 and by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Ohio-West
Virginia Affiliate of the American Heart Association.
Address for reprint requests: M. B. Maron, Dept. of Physiology,
Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine, PO Box 95, Rootstown, OH 44272 (E-mail: mbm{at}neoucom.edu).
Received 13 March 1997; accepted in final form 8 October 1997.
| 1.
|
Albert, R. K.,
S. Lakshminarayan,
N. B. Charan,
W. Kirk,
and
J. Butler.
Extra-alveolar vessel contribution to hydrostatic pulmonary edema in in situ dog lungs.
J. Appl. Physiol.
54:
1010-1017,
1983[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Best, P. V.,
and
D. Heath.
Interpretation of the appearance of the small pulmonary blood vessels in animals.
Circ. Res.
9:
288-294,
1961[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Bradley, J. D.,
P. B. Zanabon,
and
T. E. Dahms.
Species differences in pulmonary vasoactive responses to histamine, 5-hydroxytryptamine, and KCl.
J. Appl. Physiol.
74:
139-146,
1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Cohen, G. A.,
H. L. Lippton,
and
A. L. Hyman.
Neuropeptide Y (NPY) regulates the regional circulation but not the pulmonary vascular bed (Abstract).
FASEB J.
3:
A585,
1989.
|
| 5.
|
Dawson, C.,
J. H. Linehan,
and
D. A. Rickaby.
Pulmonary microcirculatory hemodynamics.
Ann. NY Acad. Sci.
384:
90-105,
1982[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Delaunois, A.,
P. Gustin,
C. Dessy-Doize,
and
M. Ansay.
Modulatory effect of neuropeptide Y on acetylcholine-induced oedema and vasoconstriction in isolated perfused lungs of rabbit.
Br. J. Pharmacol.
113:
973-981,
1994[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Edvinsson, L.,
E. Ekblad,
R. Hakanson,
and
C. Wahlestedt.
Neuropeptide Y potentiates the effect of various vasoconstrictor agents on rabbit blood vessels.
Br. J. Pharmacol.
83:
519-525,
1984[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Ekblad, E.,
L. Edvinnson,
C. Wahlestedt,
R. Uddman,
R. Hakanson,
and
F. Sundler.
Neuropeptide Y co-exists and co-operates with noradrenaline in perivascular nerve fibers.
Regul. Pept.
8:
225-235,
1984[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Han, C.,
and
P. W. Abel.
Neuropeptide Y potentiates contraction and inhibits relaxation of rabbit coronary arteries.
J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol.
9:
675-681,
1987[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Hirabayashi, A.,
K. Nishiwaki,
Y. Shimada,
and
N. Ishikawa.
Role of neuropeptide Y and its receptor subtypes in neurogenic pulmonary edema.
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
296:
297-305,
1996[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Hirabayashi, A.,
K. Nishiwaki,
K. Taki,
Y. Shimada,
and
N. Ishikawa.
Effects of neuropeptide Y on lung vascular permeability in the pulmonary circulation of rats.
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
256:
227-230,
1994[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Kinsey, R. H.,
and
J. A. Russell.
Effect of neuropeptide Y on isolated rabbit pulmonary veins (Abstract).
FASEB J.
2:
A1505,
1988.
|
| 13.
|
Kuvshinoff, B. W.,
T. Nogueira,
D. W. McFadden,
and
R. J. Fowl.
Neuropeptide Y does not mediate ischemic spinal cord injury following aortic cross-clamping in rabbits.
Ann. NY Acad. Sci.
611:
426-428,
1990.
|
| 14.
|
Lang, S. A.,
M. B. Maron,
K. C. Maender,
and
C. F. Pilati.
Circulating neuropeptide Y does not produce pulmonary hypertension during massive sympathetic activation.
J. Appl. Physiol.
73:
117-122,
1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Lang, S. A.,
M. B. Maron,
and
S. A. Signs.
Oxygen consumption after massive sympathetic nervous system activation.
Am. J. Physiol.
256 (Endocrinol. Metab. 19):
E345-E351,
1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Lindblad, B. E.,
L. B. Nielsen,
S. M. Jespersen,
A. Bjurholm,
C. Bunger,
and
E. B. Hansen.
Vasoconstrictive action of neuropeptide Y in bone.
Acta Orthop. Scand.
65:
629-634,
1994[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Madden, J. A.,
C. A. Dawson,
and
D. R. Harder.
Hypoxia-induced activation in small isolated pulmonary arteries from the cat.
J. Appl. Physiol.
59:
113-118,
1985[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Martling, C. R.,
R. Martran,
K. Alving,
T. Hokfelt,
and
J. M. Lundberg.
Innervation of lower airways and neuropeptide effects on bronchial and vascular tone in the pig.
Cell Tissue Res.
260:
223-233,
1990[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
McDermott, B. J.,
B. C. Millar,
and
H. M. Piper.
Cardiovascular effects of neuropeptide Y: receptor interactions and cellular mechanisms.
Cardiovasc. Res.
27:
893-905,
1993[Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Minkes, R. K.,
J. A. Bellan,
R. M. Saroyan,
M. D. Kerstein,
D. H. Coy,
W. A. Murphy,
B. D. Nossaman,
D. B. McNamara,
and
P. J. Kadowitz.
Analysis of cardiovascular and pulmonary responses to endothelin-1 and endothelin-3 in the anesthetized cat.
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
253:
1118-1125,
1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Minson, R. B.,
R. J. McRitchie,
and
J. P. Chalmers.
Effects of neuropeptide Y on the heart and circulation of the conscious rabbit.
J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol.
14:
699-706,
1989[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Onizuku, M.,
T. Tanita,
and
N. C. Staub.
Erythrocytes reduce liquid filtration in injured dog lungs.
Am. J. Physiol.
256 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 25):
H515-H519,
1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Pernow, J.,
and
J. M. Lundberg.
Neuropeptide Y induces potent contraction of arterial vascular smooth muscle via an endothelium-independent mechanism.
Acta Physiol. Scand.
134:
157-158,
1988[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Pilati, C. F.,
R. S. Clark,
J. Gilloteaux,
F. J. Bosso,
P. Holcomb,
and
M. B. Maron.
Excessive sympathetic nervous system activity decreases myocardial contractility.
Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.
193:
225-231,
1990[Abstract].
|
| 25.
|
Pilati, C. F.,
M. B. Maron,
and
F. J. Bosso.
Role of EDRF in the cardiopulmonary dysfunction produced by massive sympathetic activation.
J. Appl. Physiol.
78:
1642-1650,
1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Uddman, R.,
E. Ekblad,
L. Edvinnson,
R. Hakanson,
and
F. Sundler.
Neuropeptide Y-like immunoreactivity in perivascular nerve fibers of the guinea pig.
Regul. Pept.
10:
243-257,
1985[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Wahlestedt, C.,
R. Hakanson,
C. A. Vaz,
and
Z. Zukowska-Grojec.
Norepinephrine and neuropeptide Y: vasoconstrictor cooperation in vivo and in vitro.
Am. J. Physiol.
258 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 27):
R736-R742,
1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Westfall, T. C.,
J. Martin,
X. Chen,
A. Ciarleglio,
S. Carpenter,
K. Henderson,
M. Knuepfer,
M. Beinfeld,
and
L. Naes.
Cardiovascular effects and modulation of noradrenergic transmission following central and peripheral administration of neuropeptide Y.
Synapse
2:
299-307,
1988[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Zukowska-Grojec, Z.,
E. S. Marks,
and
M. Haass.
Neuropeptide Y is a potent vasoconstrictor and a cardiodepressant in rat.
Am. J. Physiol.
253 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 22):
H1234-H1239,
1987[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Zukowska-Grojec, Z.,
and
C. Wahlestadt.
Origin and actions of neuropeptide Y in the cardiovascular system.
In: The Biology of Neuropeptide Y and Related Peptides, edited by W. F. Colmers,
and C. Wahlestedt. Totowa, NJ: Humana, 1993, p. 315-388.
|