Journal of Applied Physiology Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 84: 60-68, 1998;
8750-7587/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iturriaga, R.
Right arrow Articles by Alcayaga, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Iturriaga, R.
Right arrow Articles by Alcayaga, J.

Effects of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> on catecholamine efflux from cat carotid body

Rodrigo Iturriaga and Julio Alcayaga

Laboratory of Neurobiology, P. Catholic University of Chile, and Laboratory of Neurobiology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Chile, Santiago 1, Chile

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Iturriaga, Rodrigo, and Julio Alcayaga. Effects of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> on catecholamine efflux from cat carotid body. J. Appl. Physiol. 84(1): 60-68, 1998.---Using a chronoamperometric technique with carbon-fiber microelectrodes and neural recordings, we simultaneously measured the effects of the following procedures on catecholamine efflux (Delta CA) and frequency of chemosensory discharges (fx) from superfused cat carotid body: 1) the addition of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> to Tyrode solution previously buffered with N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N' -2-ethanesulfonic acid, maintaining pH at 7.40; 2) hypercapnia (10% CO2, pH 7.10); 3) hypoxia (PO2approx  40 Torr) with and without CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB>; and 4) the impact of several boluses of dopamine (DA; 10-100 µg) on hypoxic and hypercapnic challenges. With CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB>, hypoxia increased fx which preceded Delta CA increases, whereas hypercapnia raised fx but did not consistently increase Delta CA. Repeated stimuli induced similar fx increases, but attenuated Delta CA. After DA, hypoxia produced larger Delta CA, which preceded chemosensory responses. Without CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB>, hypoxia produced a similar pattern of Delta CA and fx responses. Switching to Tyrode solution with CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> at pH 7.40 raised fx but did not increase Delta CA. With CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> and after DA, hypoxic-induced Delta CAs were larger than in its absence. Results suggest that DA release is not essential for chemosensory excitation.

dopamine release; in vitro; oxygen-carbon dioxide interaction

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

DOPAMINE (DA) is the predominant catecholamine (CA) synthesized, taken up, and stored in dense-cored vesicles by glomus cells (8, 14) of the carotid body (CB). The observation that after previous incubation with [3H]tyrosine for 2-3 h the amount of radiolabeled DA released from CBs superfused in vitro was roughly proportional to the intensity of hypoxia (9) has contributed to the hypothesis that DA is the excitatory transmitter in the CB (14, 15). However, the radiolabeling method precludes the study of the temporal correlation between chemosensory excitation and DA efflux induced by a stimulus because this method is based on the determination of overflow fractions collected for 10 or more minutes. Improvement of temporal resolution of CA determination has been possible by using electrochemical methods that measure CA oxidation currents in real time (12, 25). Recently, Donnelly (5, 6), Buerk et al. (4), and Iturriaga et al. (16) have used amperometric methods to study DA release along with chemosensory excitation induced by hypoxia, flow interruption, and NaCN in rat and cat CBs in vitro.

Because previous studies from this laboratory (16, 37) showed that the amplitude and time course of CA efflux (Delta CA) from cat CBs superfused in vitro were not correlated with chemosensory responses evoked by NaCN and hypoxia, we concluded that DA efflux is not essential for hypoxic-induced chemosensory excitation of the CB. However, these studies were performed with CBs superfused with Tyrode solution free of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB>, a condition that is known to delay the carotid chemosensory response to hypoxia in cats (17, 32), and we did not study the effect of hypercapnia on Delta CA. Such study of the effects of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> on time course and amplitude of the Delta CA induced by hypoxia seems to be necessary because carotid chemosensory response to hypoxia interacts with CO2-H+ stimuli (7, 11, 21). The study of the effects of uncompensated hypercapnia (high PCO2 and low pH) on Delta CA is also needed because hypercapnia is a strong chemoreceptor stimulus by itself, and it has been suggested that the hypercapnic excitatory mechanism is different from that of hypoxia (17, 22). However, not only did hypercapnia enhance the responses to hypoxia in situ (11, 21) and in vitro (7, 17, 29), but CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> at a constant pH of 7.40 also produced that effect. In fact, Iturriaga and Lahiri (17) and Shirahata and Fitzgerald (32) reported that, in the cat CB, the addition of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> to their in vitro perfusate media, at a constant pH of 7.40, increased basal chemosensory discharges and accelerated the chemosensory responses to hypoxia.

If DA is the excitatory transmitter between the glomus cell and the chemosensory nerve endings, not only hypercapnia but also the presence of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> at pH 7.40 in the in vitro medium should enhance DA efflux in close correlation with the changes in chemosensory activity observed in both conditions. To test this hypothesis, we studied the simultaneous responses of Delta CA and chemosensory discharges to hypercapnia (10% CO2, pH 7.10) in the superfused cat CB in vitro, as well as the simultaneous responses to the addition of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> buffer to the superfusate medium at pH 7.40, on basal conditions and hypoxia-induced (PO2 approx 40 Torr) chemosensory excitation. Because we (16, 37) previously have found that the application of exogenous DA to cat CB, superfused with CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> free medium, enhanced and accelerated the hypoxia-induced CA release without changing the speed and intensity of the chemosensory responses, we also tested the effects of intrastream injections of DA on Delta CA and chemosensory excitation induced by hypoxia during superfusion of the CB with CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB>, at pH 7.40.

    METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Experiments were performed in 12 male cats (3.1 ± 0.2 kg) anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (40 mg/kg ip). The cats were tracheotomized, and one femoral vein was cannulated for injections of additional anesthetic when necessary. The CB and the carotid sinus nerve were dissected from surrounding tissue, trimmed, placed in the channel (2.0-ml volume) of a Plexiglas chamber, and superfused with Tyrode solution (in mM: 154 Na+, 4.7 K+, 2.2 Ca2+, 1.1 Mg2+, 120.0 Cl-, 42 glutamate, 5.5 D-glucose, and 0.02 tyrosine). The Tyrode solution was buffered with N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N'-2-ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES; 5 mM) or with HEPES (5 mM) plus NaHCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> (21 mM, replacing the same amount of sodium glutamate and equilibrated with 5% CO2) to pH 7.40. The CBs were superfused at flows between 1.5 and 3.8 ml/min. The effluent was pumped with a vacuum system to maintain a fluid level in the channel adequate to cover the CB. Temperature of the superfusate solution was maintained at 37.5 ± 0.5°C by a proportional temperature controller. In some experiments, the PO2 of the superfusate medium was measured by an oxygen needle-electrode (23 gauge) connected to a polarographic device (Chemical Microsystem, Diamond General).

The frequency of chemosensory discharges (fx) was recorded from the whole desheathed carotid sinus nerve, which was placed on a pair of platinum-iridium electrodes and lifted into paraffin oil. The nerve signals were preamplified, amplified, filtered (10 Hz-1 kHz), selected with an electronic amplitude discriminator, electronically counted, and printed. The signals were also stored on a videocassette recorder analog-to-digital system for later analyses.

Delta CA was measured through a high-speed computerized chronoamperometric system (IVEC-10, Medical System). Carbon multifiber microelectrodes (3 fibers, 30-µm tip diameter, Quanteon) were gently advanced into the CB. A 550-mV pulse was applied to the carbon microelectrode, with respect to a Ag/AgCl reference electrode, for 100 ms at a rate of 5 Hz. The resulting oxidation current was digitally integrated during the last 80 ms of each pulse, averaged for five cycles, and displayed at a rate of 1 Hz. The reduction current, generated when the potential returned to resting level (0 V), was assessed in the same manner. Carbon-fiber microelectrodes were coated 4-6 times with Nafion (Aldrich Chemical) to reduce their sensitivity to ascorbic and dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (12). Carbon microelectrodes were calibrated with DA hydrochloride (DA in 0.1 mM HClO4 to prevent oxidation), at a final concentration of 2-12 µM in Tyrode solution buffered with HEPES at pH 7.40; only electrodes showing high sensitivity and linear currents (r2 > 0.995) were used. We did not attempt to differentiate between DA and other CAs released from the CB. However, most of the electroactive species measured from the CBs should correspond with DA because the reduction-to-oxidation current ratios (red/ox) measured were similar to those obtained during the calibration with DA (red/ox range: 0.5-0.7). The red/ox have been used as indexes to identify the electroactive species under oxidation (see Refs. 12, 16). Delta CA was expressed as efflux over baseline levels and was computed from the oxidation currents.

Experimental design. In a series of experiments, seven CBs were superfused with Tyrode solution containing HEPES-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> and equilibrated with 5% CO2-20% O2 at pH 7.40. The CBs were stimulated with hypercapnic (10% CO2; pH 7.10) and hypoxic superfusions (PO2 approx 40 Torr) for 5-8 min. In other series of experiments, five CBs were superfused first with Tyrode solution equilibrated with air in the absence of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> at pH 7.40 for 60-90 min and then with the same Tyrode solution supplemented with HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> and equilibrated with 5% CO2-20% O2 at pH 7.40. The CBs were exposed to hypoxic superfusion with and without CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> for 5-8 min. In both series, DA hydrochloride (10-100 µg, dissolved in saline containing 1 mM ascorbic acid to prevent oxidation) was injected into the superfusate channel 4 cm upstream from the CBs in boluses of 20-40 µl.

Results were expressed as means ± SE. Statistical differences between paired samples were assessed by Wilcoxon's signed rank test, and the differences between multiple paired samples were assessed by Friedman's test, followed by paired comparisons through Conover's test (34).

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Effects of hypercapnic and hypoxic superfusions on Delta CA and chemosensory responses in the presence of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB>. Figure 1 shows the effect of hypercapnic and hypoxic superfusions on Delta CA and fx. Switching from Tyrode solution equilibrated with 5% CO2-20% O2 at pH 7.40 to Tyrode solution equilibrated with 10% CO2-20% O2 at pH 7.10 increased fx without any noticeable change in Delta CA. By contrast, hypoxic superfusion (PO2 approx 40 Torr) increased fx and induced a delayed increase in Delta CA, equivalent to ~2.0 µM of DA. In this experiment, the maximal fx achieved during hypoxia preceded the maximal value of Delta CA by ~150 s. In the CBs studied in this series, the first hypoxic superfusion always increased Delta CA, whereas hypercapnia failed to increase Delta CA in five of seven CBs; in the remaining two, hypercapnia produced small increases in Delta CA (Delta CA < 0.5 µM). In this experimental group, the first hypoxic superfusion increased Delta CA by 3.1 ± 0.9 µM, with a time to reach the Delta CA peak of 458 ± 15.2 s, whereas fx increased from a baseline of 76.6 ± 13.8 to a maximum of 173.9 ± 26.8 Hz (P < 0.01) in 142.1 ± 16.9 s. Thus the peak of the chemosensory response to hypoxia preceded the peak of the CA signal by 324.7 ± 18.7 s (P < 0.01).


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Effect of acid-hypercapnia and hypoxia on catecholamine efflux (Delta CA) and chemosensory discharges (fx). Open horizontal bar, hypercapnic superfusion; solid horizontal bar, hypoxic superfusion.

Figure 2 shows the effects of repeated hypercapnic and hypoxic superfusions on Delta CA and on maximal fx. The CB was superfused with Tyrode solution equilibrated with 5% CO2-20% O2 at a flow of 3.8 ml/min. Both hypoxic and hypercapnic superfusions evoked chemosensory excitation and increases in Delta CA, but hypoxia induced larger and more prolonged CAs than hypercapnia. The amplitude of Delta CAs induced by hypoxia was progressively reduced by repeated stimulation, whereas maximal chemosensory response remained almost unchanged during repetitive hypercapnic and hypoxic stimulations. The CA baseline was progressively reduced along the first 55 min of normoxic superfusion, then attained a stable level. The pattern of steady chemosensory responses and progressively reduced Delta CAs in response to repeated hypoxic stimuli of the same intensity was observed in all preparations studied. In five CBs, we studied the maintenance of the amplitude of chemosensory excitation and Delta CA induced by the first and second hypoxic stimuli, separated by an interval of 20 min. The amplitude of the Delta CA induced by the first hypoxic superfusion (2.9 ± 0.9 µM) was significantly larger (P < 0.01) than the amplitude of Delta CA induced by the second hypoxic superfusion (1.7 ± 0.7 µM). Nevertheless, the amplitude of the maximal Delta fx (maximal - baseline) achieved during the first and second hypoxic stimuli was 103 ± 20.4 and 118.8 ± 16.3 Hz (P > 0.05), respectively. These results suggest that repeated exposure to hypoxic stimuli of the same intensity progressively reduced the amplitude of the releasable pool of CAs, whereas associated chemosensory responses remain largely unaffected.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Effect of repeated hypercapnic and hypoxic stimuli on Delta CA and maximal increase in fx. Delta fx, Change in fx expressed as percentage of first hypoxic response. Open and solid bars are defined as in Fig. 1.

Effect of exogenous DA on chemosensory responses and Delta CA induced by hypoxia and hypercapnia in the presence of CO2 and HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB>. Figure 3 compares the effects of the administration of exogenous DA on Delta CA induced by hypoxia and hypercapnia in two CBs. Figure 3A shows an example of the most frequently observed electrochemical response. Intrastream injections of exogenous DA (3 boluses of 10 µg each) enhanced the speed and amplitude of the subsequent Delta CA induced by hypoxia but not the amplitude and speed of the small Delta CA induced by hypercapnia (Fig. 3A). The enhancing effect of DA on the hypoxic-induced Delta CA was observed in six of seven CBs studied. Conversely, the amplitude and speed of the small Delta CA induced by hypercapnia, after DA administration, remained unchanged in five of seven CBs (Fig. 3A). In the remaining two CBs, hypercapnia increased Delta CA after the adminis-tration of DA, as shown in Fig. 3B. In this example, immediately after the administration of the third bolus of DA (100 µg), superfusion with Tyrode solution equilibrated with 10% CO2-20% O2 at pH 7.10 induced an increase in Delta CA. However, the subsequent hypercapnic stimulus performed 20 min afterward failed to evoke Delta CA. Nonetheless, a subsequent hypoxic superfusion did increase Delta CA.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Effect of dopamine (DA) injections on Delta CA induced by hypoxia and hypercapnia in 2 carotid bodies (CBs). A: DA (3 boluses of 10 µg at arrowheads) enhances speed and amplitude of next hypoxic-induced Delta CA but not that induced by hypercapnia. B: DA (3 boluses of 100 µg at arrowheads) enhances Delta CA induced by 1st hypercapnic superfusion, but a subsequent hypercapnic stimulus performed after 20 min failed to induce an appreciable Delta CA. An hypoxic superfusion performed after hypercapnia still increased Delta CA. Open and solid bars are defined as in Fig. 1.

The injections of DA (10-100 µg) always increased the CA signal recorded from the CBs (up to 30 µM), and, occasionally, the first bolus of DA reduced fx. The second and third DA boluses had no effect on fx. Figure 4 shows the effects of several DA bolus injections (10 and 100 µg) on Delta CA and chemosensory responses induced by hypoxia. The amplitude of Delta CA induced by hypoxia was largely dependent on the amount of DA previously injected into the superfusate channel (Fig. 4A), but the amplitude of the associated chemosensory responses elicited by these hypoxic superfusions was independent of the amount of DA injected (Fig. 4B). Thus, despite large differences in the amplitude of Delta CA released by hypoxia (~10 µM), the amplitude and rise time of the chemosensory responses were better maintained.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Effect of several injections of DA (10 and 100 µg at arrowheads) on Delta CA (A) induced by hypoxic superfusions (1-3) and on chemosensory responses (B). PO2, superfusate PO2. Bars, hypoxic superfusions.

Effects of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> at pH 7.40 and DA on the hypoxic-induced Delta CA and chemosensory discharges. In another series of experiments, five CBs were initially superfused with CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB>-free Tyrode solution, equilibrated with 20% O2 at pH 7.40, and then superfused with the same Tyrode solution supplemented with HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> and equilibrated with 5% CO2-20% O2 at the same pH. Figure 5 shows the usual electrochemical responses induced by hypoxia during superfusion with Tyrode solution either without (Fig. 5A) or with CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> (Fig. 5B), before and after the administration of intrastream injections of DA (3 boluses of 10 µg). Without CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB>, and before the administration of DA, hypoxia induced a delayed increase in Delta CA, attaining a maximum response at the end of the 7-min period of hypoxic superfusion (H1 in Fig. 5A). Immediately after the injection of the third bolus of DA, the same hypoxic superfusion produced a fast increase in Delta CA (H2 in Fig. 5A), whereas a later hypoxic superfusion period, performed after 20 min, evoked a reduced and delayed Delta CA response (H3 in Fig. 5A). The presence of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> in the superfusate medium did not modify this pattern of the hypoxic-induced Delta CAs, as shown in Fig. 5B. However, after the administration of DA, hypoxia (H4 in Fig. 5B) produced a larger increase in Delta CA than in the absence of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB>, whereas a hypoxic superfusion (H5 in Fig. 5B) performed after 20 min evoked only a small and delayed Delta CA. Figure 5C shows the Delta CAs and chemosensory responses elicited by hypoxic stimulations H1, H2, and H4. Despite large differences in amplitude and dissimilar time course of the Delta CA induced by these hypoxic superfusions, the chemosensory responses were similar (Fig. 5C).


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Effects of DA (3 boluses of 10 µg at arrowheads) on Delta CA induced by hypoxic superfusions (H1-H5; bars). A: effects during superfusion with Tyrode solution without CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB>. B: effects during superfusion of Tyrode solution with CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB>. C: effects of hypoxic superfusions H1, H2, and H4 on Delta CA and fx.

In the absence of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> in the superfusate medium, the hypoxic superfusion performed immediately before DA injection (this exposure corresponds to the second or third hypoxic superfusions performed in these 5 CBs) increased Delta CA by 1.6 ± 0.9 µM, with a time to reach the Delta CA peak of 449.6 ± 33.7 s. The rise in fx from a baseline of 48.2 ± 10.9 to 184.2 ± 26.2 Hz occurred in 191.6 ± 14.6 s, and the interval between the peak of the chemosensory responses and the peak of Delta CAs was 248.6 ± 27.9 s (P < 0.05). After the administration of DA, the same hypoxic stimuli increased Delta CA by 2.6 ± 0.4 µM (P < 0.05), with a time to reach the peak of 142.2 ± 25.4 s. Because the increase in fx from a baseline of 33.5 ± 12.0 Hz to a maximum of 182.8 ± 26.8 Hz occurred in 206.4 ± 16.6 s, the peak of the Delta CA induced by hypoxia after DA preceded the fx peak by 70.2 ± 10.4 s. Switching from normoxic superfusion with HEPES-buffered Tyrode solution to HEPES-CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB>-containing Tyrode solution at constant pH 7.40 increased fx without any apparent change in Delta CA (Fig. 6). In these five CBs, the presence of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> buffer raised the baseline chemosensory discharges from 36.0 ± 8.4 to 84.4 ± 12.6 Hz (P < 0.01) but was unable to evoke an appreciable increase in Delta CA. It is noteworthy that the last hypoxic exposure performed during superfusion with Tyrode solution free of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> produced an increase in Delta CA of only 0.5 ± 0.2 µM (P > 0.05). A new hypoxic stimulation performed a few minutes after the switch to CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB>-buffered medium evoked a small, not significant (P > 0.05), increase in Delta CA of 0.4 ± 0.2 µM over baseline but produced a similar maximal chemosensory response of 188.8 ± 29.7 Hz.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Effects of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB>-buffered Tyrode solution on Delta CA and fx. In normoxic condition, isohydric (pH 7.40) superfusion was switched from HEPES-buffered to CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB>-buffered Tyrode solution (arrowhead). After 10 min, CB was superfused with hypoxic medium for 7 min. Bar, hypoxic superfusion.

The presence of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> buffer in the superfused medium accelerated the chemosensory response induced by hypoxia. The time to reach the maximal fx response induced by hypoxia was reduced from 191.6 ± 14.6 to 175.2 ± 15.9 s (P < 0.05, n = 5) in the presence of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB>, with respect to the same condition but without CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB>. Figure 7 summarizes the effects of DA administration on the time to reach the maximal values of Delta CA and fx induced by hypoxia in the five CBs during superfusion either without or with CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB>. After the injection of DA, either without (Fig. 7A) or with CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> (Fig. 7B) in the superfused medium, the time to reach the maximal value of Delta CA decreased, whereas the time necessary to reach the maximal fx response was unchanged (P > 0.05). The effects of DA administration on the amplitude of Delta CA and on the chemosensory responses induced by hypoxia in the presence or absence of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> in the five CBs are summarized in Fig. 8. After DA administration, the amplitude of Delta CA induced by hypoxia was smaller in the absence of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> (2.6 ± 0.4 µM) than that induced by hypoxia (6.4 ± 3.0 µM) in the presence of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> (P < 0.01; Conover test after Friedman test; Fig. 8). Regardless of substantial and significant differences in the amplitude of the hypoxic-induced Delta CA between the experimental conditions, the amplitude of the chemosensory responses remained mostly unchanged (P > 0.05).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Effects of DA (3 boluses of 10-100 µg) on time to reach maximal values of Delta CA (tCA) and fx (tfx) induced by hypoxia in 5 CBs in absence (A) and presence (B) of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB>. Open bars, control response; hatched bars, after DA. * P < 0.05 with respect to control response.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Effects of DA (3 boluses of 10-100 µg) on amplitude of Delta CA and fx induced by hypoxia during superfusion in 5 CBs without (A) and with (B) CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB>. Open bars, control hypoxic stimulations; hatched bars, hypoxic stimulation after DA; solid bars, hypoxic stimulation after 20 min without DA. * P < 0.05 with respect to control response.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The prevailing hypothesis of CB chemoreception proposes that the glomus (type I) cells are the primary site of transduction of O2, CO2 and H+ stimuli (8, 14), although this is not a unanimous view (26, 33). In response to hypoxia and hypercapnia, glomus cells are expected to release an excitatory transmitter, which, in turn, generates the chemosensory impulses in the afferent nerve endings. If DA is the excitatory transmitter released from the glomus cells of the CB in response to hypercapnia and hypoxia, a close relationship should exist between the amplitude of DA efflux and chemosensory excitation, even on repeated exposure to the same stimuli. Contrary to this expectation, present results show that hypoxia produced chemosensory excitation and increased Delta CA, but hypercapnia, although evoking chemosensory excitation, did not consistently increase Delta CA. Similarly, switching superfusion from HEPES-buffered medium to Tyrode solution containing CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> at pH 7.40 increased basal fx but failed to release CAs. Moreover, either in the presence of CO2 and HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> or in their absence at the same pH 7.40, repeated hypoxic and hypercapnic stimulations progressively reduced the amplitude of Delta CA from the CB, although producing similar increases in fx. These results extend our previous observations that repeated injections of NaCN and hypoxic stimuli progressively reduced Delta CA but still increased fx in the cat CB superfused with Tyrode solution free of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> (16, 37). A similar pattern of response was recently reported by Donnelly (6) in the rat CB, in which repetitive anoxic stimulations resulted in progressive reductions in Delta CA, measured by amperometry, whereas the amplitude of the chemosensory responses was maintained. Furthermore, Donnelly (6) reported that the exposure of rat CB to moderate hypoxia (PO2 approx 80 Torr) and repetitive anoxia produced Delta CAs of comparable amplitude, although the maximum chemosensory response was significantly reduced in mild hypoxia. Taken together, these observations show a clear dissociation between the amplitude of chemosensory excitation and Delta CA and do not support the hypothesis of DA being the excitatory hypercapnic or hypoxic transmitter in the CB.

Our results showed that the peak chemosensory response to hypoxia preceded the corresponding Delta CA peak by 3 min or more. The time course of the delayed Delta CA induced by mild hypoxia in the cat in vitro CB preparation in this study is similar to that elicited by anoxia and severe hypoxia in the rat CB superfused in vitro (5). On the contrary, Buerk et al. (4), using gold microelectrodes polarized at 150 mV, obtained faster Delta CAs evoked by interruption of the perfused flow in the perfused-superfused preparation of the cat CB. They attributed the fast and slow rates of Delta CA to the distance between the electrode tip and the glomus cell clusters. Microelectrodes that poorly penetrate the CB exhibited slower Delta CA. Thus a delayed Delta CA may be explained by a lengthy diffusion distance between the source of CA (i.e., glomus cell clusters) and the tip of the carbon-fiber electrode (see Refs. 6 and 16 for discussion). However, we cannot attribute the fast and slow rates of Delta CA found in this study to the distance of the electrode tip to the glomus cells. After administration of DA to the CB, both the speed and the amplitude of the subsequent hypoxia-induced Delta CA were markedly enhanced, but the amplitude and rate of rise of the chemosensory response were not modified. Therefore, the normal pattern of a delayed Delta CA induced by hypoxia that followed the rise in fx was reversed, and after DA application the Delta CA peak precedes the peak of the chemosensory response. Thus slow, without preloading of the CB with exogenous DA, and faster Delta CA responses, after preloading of the CB with exogenous DA, appeared to depend on the amount of DA stored in the CB cells and are independent of the distance between the tip of the microelectrode and the glomus cells, which remained constant during the experiment.

The faster and larger Delta CAs induced by hypoxia, and, in a few cases, by hypercapnia, after applications of exogenous DA, suggest that part of the DA, which increased Delta CA up to 30 µM, was incorporated by the glomus cells or other CB cellular structures. This recently incorporated DA pool is released by the next hypoxic stimulation and is rapidly exhausted by repeated hypoxic stimuli, whereas the chemosensory response remains without noticeable changes. Cytotoxic-hypoxic stimulation evoked by cyanide also produced a similar reduction in the exogenously incorporated DA pool (16). A newly incorporated DA pool that is rapidly taken up and released from the glomus cells is compatible with the very fast washout of newly incorporated [3H]DA, with a half-time of 4 min, found in rabbit CBs (13). Thus it is possible that exogenous DA may increase the store of DA in the glomus cells, and after the release even from the same source, the steeper diffusion gradient may account for the earlier increase in Delta CA. It is also plausible that exogenous DA may load the endings of sympathetic neurons or petrosal chemosensory afferent neurons. In fact, Finley et al. (10) found that 41% of the rat CB afferents expresses tyrosine hydroxylase, the rate-limiting enzyme of catecholamine synthesis, whereas 86% of these fibers also contains 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine decarboxylase, the DA-synthesizing enzyme. Moreover, Almaraz and Fidone (2) found evidence that selective stimulation of C-fibers in the carotid sinus nerve of cats produced the release of [3H]CA from the CB. However, neither chronic carotid sinus nerve section nor chronic sympathectomy modified the uptake of [3H]DA in the rabbit CB, suggesting that the uptake of DA by sympathetic or chemosensory afferent neurons should be small compared with that by glomus cells (13). Moreover, the synthesis and release of [3H]DA from the cat CB induced by hypoxia (30) and severe hypercapnia (31) were unaffected by chronic carotid sinus nerve section.

Contrary to what was found during hypoxia, our results show that hypercapnia did not consistently increase Delta CA but produced chemosensory excitation. These results agree with the preliminary statement of Buerk et al. (4) that hypercapnia produced chemosensory excitation but did not cause significant DA release from the cat CB perfused in vitro. Rigual el al. (31) reported that extremely hypercapnic and acid stimuli (pH 6.6) produced more consistent releases of [3H]DA in the cat CB. They found that the most effective stimulus was 20% CO2 at pH 6.8 (31). However, this stimulus produced an increase in [3H]DA of only ~2-3 times the baseline, smaller than the 10-20 times over the baseline increase in [3H]DA induced by hypoxia reported by the same researchers (see Ref. 14 for review). The major difference between their cat CB preparation and ours is the duration of the effects of stimuli. They reported that 10 min of acid superfusion produced prolonged fx and [3H]DA increases, lasting 30 and 45 min, respectively (31). On the contrary, in our preparation fx and Delta CA remained elevated for <5 and 10 min, respectively, after cessation of the 5- to 8-min period of acid hypercapnic or hypoxic superfusion.

Present results confirm that hypoxia stimulates fx in the absence of exogenous CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> (7, 17, 18). Hypoxia reduced the PO2-dependent K+ current in isolated glomus cells bathed in a CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB>-free medium (23), increased intracellular [Ca2+] (35), and evoked the release of CA from isolated glomus cells (35), even though the pH of glomus cells is expected to be alkaline (up to pH 7.8) in the absence of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> (3). These results agree with our observation that O2 chemoreception does not require the participation of exogenous CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB>. However, the presence of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> in the superfusate medium, at pH 7.40, raised baseline fx and accelerated the chemosensory responses to hypoxia. However, the effects of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> on baseline and hypoxic-induced rise of fx found in the superfused preparation were less marked than in the perfused preparations of the cat CB (17, 32). The different effects of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> on the speed of chemosensory responses to hypoxia could be attributed to the characteristics of both in vitro preparations. In the superfused CB, all the substrates, including CO2 and H+ produced within the CB, must diffuse along the CB tissue, resulting in a gradient from the core to the periphery of the organ. Thus endogenous production of CO2 and H+ in the chemoreceptor cells of the superfused CB could be enough to maintain an acid intracellular pH to keep fast and suitable O2 chemoreception for several hours (7, 16). On the other hand, perfusion of the CB with saline solutions that allow the exchange of substrates between the vessels and the glomus cells seems to be ideal, but the flow through the CB should be higher than the normal flow due to the reduced viscosity of the saline solutions compared with blood. Consequently, endogenous CO2 production in the perfused CB is expected to be rapidly washed out by the high saline flow and may be not enough to maintain an acid intracellular milieu. Thus the presence of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> at pH 7.40 in the perfusate medium is expected to produce a large effect on the intracellular pH of glomus cells due to CO2 hydration mediated by carbonic anhydrase (18), increasing not only basal fx but also hypoxic chemoreception (17, 32). Indeed, the presence of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> at pH 7.40 in the superfusate medium reduced the intracellular pH of isolated glomus cells from 7.8 to 7.2 (3). The lack of effect of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> on the amplitude of hypoxic chemosensory responses found here agrees with previous observations in the cat CB perfused in vitro (16) and resembles the recent finding that the presence of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> in the in vitro medium did not increase the amplitude of anoxic chemosensory responses in a superfused rat CB preparation (28).

Present results showed that the presence of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> did not enhance the amplitude of hypoxic-induced Delta CA. In fact, the initial hypoxic test performed in the presence of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> at pH 7.40 increased Delta CA by 3.10 ± 0.9 µM (n = 7). This value is not significantly different from the increase of 3.16 ± 0.8 µM (P > 0.05, n = 8) produced by the first hypoxic stimulation in previous experimental series done with CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> - free medium (16). However, present results show that the presence of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> in the superfusate medium increased the amplitude of the hypoxia-induced Delta CA after DA administration compared with the Delta CA evoked in the same conditions but in the absence of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB>. This result suggests that the incorporation of exogenous DA by the CB cells is enhanced by the presence of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB>. Panisello and Donnelly (28) found that the presence of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> enhanced the hypoxic-induced Delta CA in the rat CB but that acid superfusion (pH 6.5) did not mimic the enhancing effect of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> on Delta CA, which was reduced by the anion channel blocker 9-anthracene carboxylic acid. These results suggest that the effect of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> on the CA release induced by hypoxia seems to be related to HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> transport rather than to intracellular acidification. However, it is still possible that the enhancing effect of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> on CA secretion induced by hypoxia may be explained by a large amount of DA reuptake and storage in dense cored vesicles due to the intracellular acidification induced by CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB>. It is well known that accumulation of CA in chromaffin granules is related to the magnitude of the H+ concentration gradient across the membrane granule (20). In addition, it is conceivable that the acidosis induced by high CO2 may directly excite the nerve endings of the chemosensory afferent neurons. However, Alcayaga and Arroyo (1) recently reported that local acidification of cat petrosal neurons in primary culture had no effect on the electrically evoked action potentials in ~20% of the recorded neurons. In the remaining 80% of the recorded neurons, they found that acidification blocked the evoked action potentials. When petrosal neurons were cocultured with glomus cells, 10% of the recorded neurons responded to acidification with a train of action potentials, suggesting that CB tissue is necessary to develop that response in the sensory neurons that innervated the glomus cells.

Our results show that the initial injection of DA (10-100 µg) produced in some preparations transient inhibition of fx, after which the CB became nonreactive to DA. This confirms previous observations of Zapata (36) that intrastream injections of DA applied to cat CBs superfused in vitro produced transient inhibition of fx but that repeated intrastream injections of DA resulted in desensitization of the inhibitory actions, and even produced late excitatory effects in response to large doses. In experiments in situ, intracarotid and intravenous injections of exogenous DA produced chemosensory inhibition, excitation, or dual effects in CBs from different species (see Refs. 8 and 14 for review). In the cat, intracarotid and intravenous injections of DA always produced transient inhibition of fx (18, 24), whereas continuous intravenous infusion of DA decreased the chemosensory responsiveness to hypoxia and hypercapnia (22), suggesting that DA release is not responsible for O2 and CO2 chemosensory responses in the cat CB (19, 22, 24). This inhibitory effect is reversed into excitation by large DA doses after blockade of D2 DA receptors (19, 24). Domperidone, an antagonist of D2 receptors, produces a maintained increase in fx and enhances chemosensory responses to hyperoxia (100% O2), hypoxia (100% N2), and NaCN (19). Similarly, the dopaminergic D2 antagonist haloperidol potentiates chemosensory responses to hypoxia and hypercapnia in cats (22). Thus the effects of DA and D2 antagonist on cat CB chemoreception suggest a modulatory role for DA within the cat CB but do not support the hypothesis of DA acting as an excitatory transmitter.

In summary, our results show that, under present experimental conditions, the presence of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> in the superfused medium has no effect on hypoxia-induced Delta CA from the CB, although it may enhance the uptake of exogenously applied DA. The time course and amplitude of chemosensory responses induced by hypercapnia and mild hypoxia in the presence of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> are not related to the changes in Delta CA, suggesting that CA release is not essential for hypercapnia- or hypoxia- induced chemosensory excitation in the cat CB.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Mrs. Carolina Larraín for assistance in the preparation of the experiments and the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

This work was supported by Grant 195-0997 from the Fondo Nacional de DeSarrollo Científico y Tecnológico (FONDECYT) of Chile.

Address for reprint requests: R. Iturriaga, Laboratory of Neurobiology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, P. Catholic Univ. of Chile, Casilla 114-D, Santiago 1, Chile (E-mail: riturria{at}genes.bio.puc.cl).

Received 13 March 1997; accepted in final form 19 August 1997.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

  1. Alcayaga, J., and J. Arroyo. Responses of cat petrosal ganglion neurons are modified by the presence of carotid body cells in culture. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 410: 195-201, 1996[Medline].
  2. Almaraz, L., and S. Fidone. Carotid sinus nerve-C fibers release catecholamine from the cat carotid body. Neurosci. Lett. 67: 153-158, 1986[Medline].
  3. Buckler, K. J., R. D. Vaughan-Jones, C. Peers, and P. C. G. Nye. Intracellular pH and its regulation in the isolated type I carotid body cells of the neonatal rat. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 436: 107-129, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  4. Buerk, D. G., S. Lahiri, D. Chugh, and A. Mokashi. Electrochemical detection of rapid DA release kinetics during hypoxia in perfused-superfused cat CB. J. Appl. Physiol. 78: 830-837, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  5. Donnelly, D. F. Electrochemical detection of catecholamine release from rat carotid body in vitro. J. Appl. Physiol. 74: 2330-2337, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  6. Donnelly, D. F. Chemoreceptor nerve excitation may be not proportional to catecholamine secretion. J. Appl. Physiol. 81: 657-664, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  7. Eyzaguirre, C., and H. Koyano. Effects of hypoxia, hypercapnia, and pH on the chemoreceptor activity in vitro. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 178: 385-409, 1965[Free Full Text].
  8. Eyzaguirre, C., and P. Zapata. Perspectives in carotid body research. J. Appl. Physiol. 57: 931-957, 1984[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  9. Fidone, S. J., C. González, and K. Yoshizaki. Effects of low oxygen on the release of dopamine from the rabbit carotid body in vitro. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 333: 93-110, 1982[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  10. Finley, J. C. W., J. Polak, and D. M. Katz. Trasnsmitter diversity in carotid body afferent neurons: Dopaminergic and peptidergic phenotypes. Neuroscience 51: 973-987, 1992[Medline].
  11. Fitzgerald, R. S., and P. Parks. Effects of hypoxia on carotid chemoreceptor response to carbon dioxide in cats. Respir. Physiol. 12: 218-229, 1971[Medline].
  12. Gerhardt, G. A., A. F. Oke, G. Nagy, B. Moghaddam, and R. N. Adams. Nafion-coated electrodes with high selectivity for CNS electrochemistry. Brain Res. 290: 390-395, 1984[Medline].
  13. González, E., R. Rigual, S. J. Fidone, and C. González. Mechanisms for termination of the action of dopamine in carotid body chemoreceptors. J. Auton. Nerv. Syst. 18: 249-259, 1987[Medline].
  14. González, C., L. Almaraz, A. Obeso, and R. Rigual. Carotid body chemoreceptors: from natural stimuli to sensory discharges. Physiol. Rev. 74: 829-898, 1994[Free Full Text].
  15. González-Guerrero, P. R., R. Rigual, and C. González. Effects of chronic hypoxia on opiode peptide and catecholamine levels and on the release of dopamine in the rabbit carotid body. J. Neurochem. 60: 1765-1769, 1993.
  16. Iturriaga, R., J. Alcayaga, and P. Zapata. Dissociation of hypoxia-induced chemosensory responses and catecholamine efflux in the cat carotid body superfused in vitro. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 497: 551-564, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  17. Iturriaga, R., and S. Lahiri. Carotid body chemoreception in the absence and presence of CO2-HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB>. Brain Res. 568: 253-260, 1991[Medline].
  18. Iturriaga, R., S. Lahiri, and A. Mokashi. Carbonic anhydrase and chemoreception in the cat carotid body. Am. J. Physiol. 261 (Cell Physiol. 30): C565-C573, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  19. Iturriaga, R., C. Larraín, and P. Zapata. Effect of domperidone blockade upon carotid chemosensory activity and its hypoxia-induced excitation. Brain Res. 663: 145-154, 1994[Medline].
  20. Johnson, R. G., and A. Scarpa. Protonmotive force and catecholamine transport in isolated chromaffin granules. J. Biol. Chem. 254: 3750-3760, 1978[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  21. Lahiri, S., and R. G. DeLaney. Stimulus interaction in the responses of carotid body chemoreceptor single afferent fibers. Respir. Physiol. 24: 249-266, 1975[Medline].
  22. Lahiri, S., T. Nishino, A. Mokashi, and E. Mulligan. Interaction of dopamine and haloperidol with O2 and CO2 chemoreception in carotid body. J. Appl. Physiol. 49: 45-51, 1980[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  23. López-López, J., C. González, J. Ureña, and J. López-Barneo. Low PO2 selectively inhibits K channel activity in chemoreceptor cells of the mammalian carotid body. J. Gen. Physiol. 93: 1001-1015, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  24. Llados, F., and P. Zapata. Effects of dopamine analogues and antagonists on carotid body chemosensory in situ. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 274: 487-499, 1978[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  25. Marsden, C. A., M. H. Joseph, Z. L. Kruk, N. T. Maidment, R. D. O'Neill, J. O. Schenk, and J. A. Stamford. In vivo voltammetry. Present electrodes and methods. Neuroscience 25: 389-400, 1988[Medline].
  26. Mitchell, R. A., A. K. Sihna, and D. M. McDonald. Chemoreceptive properties of regenerated endings of the carotid sinus nerve. Brain Res. 43: 680-685, 1972.
  27. Mulligan, E., and S. Lahiri. Separation of carotid body chemoreceptor responses to O2 and CO2 by oligomycin and by actinomycin A. Am. J. Physiol. 242 (Cell Physiol. 11): C200-C206, 1982[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  28. Panisello, J. M., and D. F. Donnelly. Catecholamine secretion from glomus cells is dependent on extracellular bicarbonate. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 410: 267-273, 1996[Medline].
  29. Pepper, D. R., R. C. Landauer, and P. Kumar. Postnatal development of CO2-O2 interaction in the rat carotid body in vitro. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 485: 531-541, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  30. Rigual, R., E. González, C. González, and S. Fidone. Synthesis and release of catecholamine by the cat carotid body in vitro: effects of hypoxic stimulation. Brain Res. 374: 101-109, 1986[Medline].
  31. Rigual, R., J. R. López-López, and C. González. Release of dopamine and chemoreceptor discharge induced by low pH and high PCO2 stimulation of the cat carotid body J. Physiol. (Lond.) 433: 519-531, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  32. Shirahata, M., and R. S. Fitzgerald. The presence of CO2/HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB> is essential for hypoxic chemotransduction in the in vivo perfused carotid body. Brain Res. 545: 297-300, 1991[Medline].
  33. Sun, M.-K., and D. J. Reis. Dopamine or transmitter release from rat carotid body may not be essential to hypoxic chemoreception. Am. J. Physiol. 267 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 36): R1632-R1639, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  34. Theodorson-Norheim, E. Friedman and Quade test: Basic computer program to perform nonparametric two-way analysis of variance and multiple comparisons of several related samples. Comput. Biol. Med. 17: 85-99, 1987[Medline].
  35. Ureña, J., R. Fernández-Chacón, A. R. Benot, G. Alvarez de Toledo, and J. López-Barneo. Hypoxia induces voltage-dependent Ca2+ entry and quantal dopamine secretion in carotid body glomus cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 10208-10211, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  36. Zapata, P. Effects of dopamine on carotid chemo- and baroreceptors in vitro. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 244: 235-251, 1975[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  37. Zapata, P., R. Iturriaga, and J. Alcayaga. Dopamine efflux from the carotid body during hypoxic stimulation. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 410: 261-266, 1996[Medline].


The Journal of Applied Physiology 84(1):60-68
0161-7567/98 $5.00 Copyright © 1998 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. M. Munoz-Cabello, J. J. Toledo-Aral, J. Lopez-Barneo, and M. Echevarria
Rat Adrenal Chromaffin Cells Are Neonatal CO2 Sensors
J. Neurosci., July 13, 2005; 25(28): 6631 - 6640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. Iturriaga, S. Villanueva, and M. Mosqueira
Dual effects of nitric oxide on cat carotid body chemoreception
J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2000; 89(3): 1005 - 1012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
O. S. Bamford, L. M. Sterni, M. J. Wasicko, M. H. Montrose, and J. L. Carroll
Postnatal maturation of carotid body and type I cell chemoreception in the rat
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, May 1, 1999; 276(5): L875 - L884.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
D. G. Buerk, S. Osanai, A. Mokashi, and S. Lahiri
Dopamine, sensory discharge, and stimulus interaction with CO2 and O2 in cat carotid body
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 1998; 85(5): 1719 - 1726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iturriaga, R.
Right arrow Articles by Alcayaga, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Iturriaga, R.
Right arrow Articles by Alcayaga, J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online