Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 84: 303-310, 1998;
8750-7587/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Presson Jr., R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Dawson, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Presson Jr., R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Dawson, C. A.

Anatomic distribution of pulmonary vascular compliance

Robert G. Presson Jr., Said H. Audi, Christopher C. Hanger, Gerald M. Zenk, Richard A. Sidner, John H. Linehan, Wiltz W. Wagner Jr., and Christopher A. Dawson

Departments of Anesthesia, Physiology/Biophysics, Pediatrics, and Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202; Department of Physiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53226; Research Service, Zablocki Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Milwaukee 53295; and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53233

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Presson, Robert G., Jr., Said H. Audi, Christopher C. Hanger, Gerald M. Zenk, Richard A. Sidner, John H. Linehan, Wiltz W. Wagner, Jr., and Christopher A. Dawson. Anatomic distribution of pulmonary vascular compliance. J. Appl. Physiol. 84(1): 303-310, 1998.---Previously, the pressure changes after arterial and venous occlusion have been used to characterize the longitudinal distribution of pulmonary vascular resistance with respect to vascular compliance using compartmental models. However, the compartments have not been defined anatomically. Using video microscopy of the subpleural microcirculation, we have measured the flow changes in ~40-µm arterioles and venules after venous, arterial, and double occlusion maneuvers. The quasi-steady flows through these vessels after venous occlusion permitted an estimation of the compliance in three anatomic segments: arteries >40 µm, veins >40 µm, and vessels <40 µm in diameter. We found that ~65% of the total pulmonary vascular compliance was in vessels <40 µm, presumably mostly capillaries. The transient portions of the pressure and flow data after venous, arterial, and double occlusion were consistent with most of the arterial compliance being upstream from most of the arterial resistance and most of the venous compliance being downstream from most of the venous resistance.

pulmonary microcirculation; arterial occlusion; venous occlusion; double occlusion; video fluorescence microscopy; digital image analysis; fluorescently labeled red blood cells; vascular resistance; mathematical model; isolated dog lung

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

PULMONARY ARTERIAL and venous occlusions have been used to characterize the longitudinal distribution of pulmonary vascular resistance with respect to compliance between the arterial and venous sites of occlusion (1-3, 6, 9-12, 18). The data obtained have been the time-varying arterial and venous pressures after occlusion. Various models (generally compartmental) have been used to interpret these data in terms of the distribution of compliance and resistance (2, 9, 11, 12). The process of determining the model elements needed to explain the data has provided insights into the mechanics of the pulmonary vascular bed. However, the identification of the arterial or venous sites of changes in vascular resistance and compliance and a determination of the pulmonary capillary pressure have been primary objectives of many of the studies. Such structure-function correlations have been based primarily on the observation that vasoconstrictor stimuli affect the model parameters in ways consistent with their known arterial or venous sites of action (2, 6, 12, 16). These correlations then provide the basis for interpreting the effects of stimuli having unknown sites of action. There are also other kinds of indirect evidence linking model parameters and anatomy, e.g., comparison of the compartmental nodal pressures with pressures estimated by other methods (6, 11, 18). The interpretations of these results have varied (2).

We have added the measurement of flow in subpleural arterioles and venules after vascular occlusion as an additional source of information linking structure and function. The flows were measured in isolated dog lung lobes under zone 3 conditions by using video microscopy to track fluorescently labeled red blood cells in vessels with diameters of ~40 µm. Under the assumption that fractional changes in flow in these vessels are representative of the fractional changes in flow in similarly sized vessels throughout the lungs, these arteriolar and venular flows allow for a direct, i.e., model-independent, estimation of the compliances of the arteries, capillaries, and veins from the flow response to venous occlusion. The rationale is that when the venous outflow is occluded while arterial inflow remains constant, the axial flow observed at any site between the inlet and the site of occlusion will be the inflow rate minus the rate of volume storage in the distensible vessels upstream from the site of observation. Because the rate of change in pressure at all locations within the system will be equal once the quasi-steady state has been established and because compliance is the change in volume for a given change in pressure, the rate of upstream volume storage over total flow is equal to the ratio of upstream compliance to total compliance. If the total compliance is estimated by measuring the change in pressure resulting from the total volume stored in the system up to a given time, the actual compliance of the segments upstream and downstream from the sites of observation, in this case ~40-µm subpleural arterioles and venules, can be calculated.

Using the compliances calculated from the flow data after venous occlusion and the pressure measured after simultaneous occlusion of arterial inflow and venous outflow (double-occlusion pressure), we used a previously described three-capacitor-two-resistor (3C2R) compartmental model representation of the lobar vascular bed (2) (Fig. 1) to calculate the londitudinal distribution of vascular resistance and determine its relationship to the distribution of compliance.


View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   A 3-capacitor-2-resistor (3C2R) compartmental model of pulmonary circulation. FT, total flow into lung; Pa, pulmonary arterial pressure; Pc, pulmonary capillary pressure; Pv, pulmonary venous pressure; C1, C2, and C3, compliances of arteries, capillaries, and veins, respectively; R1 and R2, resistance of arteries and veins, respectively, with any resistance in capillaries contributing equally to R1 and R2 (3).

    METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Experimental preparation. Adult, male, mongrel dogs (n = 6, 19-25 kg) were sedated with acepromazine (10 mg im), and ~100 ml of blood were withdrawn from each animal by venipuncture. By use of techniques described in detail elsewhere (19), the red blood cells were fluorescently labeled with DiI16(3) and then reinfused. A 1-day delay was allowed to permit removal of any cells damaged during the labeling process. On the day after labeling, the animals were anesthetized by intravenous injection of pentobarbital sodium (30 mg/kg) freshly dissolved in 0.9% saline that was supplemented by 5 mg/kg doses as needed to maintain surgical anesthesia, intubated, and ventilated with air via a constant-volume respirator (model 607D, Harvard Apparatus). At that time, flow cytometry showed that 2-3% of the circulating red blood cells were fluorescently labeled. After heparinization (1,000 U/kg) the animals were rapidly exsanguinated through a cannula (3 mm ID) placed in the left common carotid artery. During the exsanguination, 150 ml of 10% dextran (70 kDa) in saline were infused (6). With the lungs inflated to a constant airway pressure of ~4 mmHg, the left chest wall and the left upper lobe were excised to provide access to the left lower lobe. The left lower lobar artery was cannulated with a Teflon FEP cannula (6 mm ID), and the left lower lobe bronchus was clamped to maintain constant inflation. The left lower lobe was then excised along with a cuff of left atrium and placed on a microscope stand. The surface of the lobe was kept moist with saline throughout the procedure. The left atrial cuff was secured around another Teflon FEP cannula (10 mm ID), and the lobe was perfused with autologous, heparinized whole blood (hematocrit 31 ± 3%). Care was taken to exclude all air bubbles from the circuit before initiation of perfusion. The time interval from complete exsanguination to reperfusion of the lobe was ~25 min. Blood was pumped (model 7522-10 pump drive and model 7024-20 pump head, Masterflex) through a pulse dampener to reduce pump vibrations and trap bubbles, a filter (20-µm pore size, model 4C2423, Fenwal) to remove microaggregates, and a heat exchanger (model HE-100, Bentley) to maintain the blood at 37-38°C (Fig. 2). Venous blood drained from the lobe into a reservoir. Pump flow rate was set between 200 and 400 ml/min. The height of the reservoir was adjusted so that the venous pressure (Pv) was ~9 mmHg to maintain the lobes in zone 3 conditions when the airway pressure was 5 mmHg.


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Schematic of experimental setup. ICCD, intensified charge-coupled device; A to D, analog-to-digital.

The lobe was ventilated with 6% CO2-17% O2-77% N2. Blood gases were sampled from the pulmonary venous line periodically and measured by using an Instrumentation Laboratories model 1304 analyzer. Sodium bicarbonate solution (1 meq/ml) was added to the venous reservoir as needed to neutralize metabolic acid. Average values were arterial PO2 of 112 ± 2 Torr, arterial PCO2 of 36 ± 1 Torr, and pH of 7.39 ± 0.01. There were no significant differences between blood gas measurements sampled at the beginning of the experiment and those sampled at the end (paired 2-tailed t-test, P > 0.10). A 100-ml tidal volume kept peak inspiratory pressure <10 mmHg. Expiratory pressure was set at 5 mmHg by a water overflow on the expiratory limb of the ventilator. Arterial pressure (Pa), Pv, and airway pressure were measured from side ports in the respective cannulas (model P23 XL, Statham) zeroed at the level of the subpleural vessels under observation. The output from the pressure transducers was amplified (model 13-G4615-52, Gould), processed by a 50-Hz low-pass analog filter, then sampled at 100 Hz by an analog-to-digital board (model C10-DA508-PGA, Computer Boards) in a microcomputer (Dell 50-MHz 486).

Video microscopy. The lobe was suspended by two small spring-backed paper clips attached to opposite edges of the lobe (21) and raised until the uppermost pleural surface (the diaphragmatic surface in this orientation) came into contact with a transparent window. A 1.3-cm2 area on the surface of the lobe was observed through the window. The windowpane was surrounded by a vacuum ring to prevent lateral movement of the observed area (20). Suspending the lobe against the window in this manner allowed free downward expansion of the lobe during ventilation and prevented compression of the subpleural alveoli by the window. The remainder of the lobar surface was covered with a thin sheet of plastic to prevent drying and to slow the transpleural diffusion of gas.

The subpleural microcirculation under the window was observed with a modified Olympus BH2 reflectance microscope coupled to a Leitz Ultropak illuminator with a ×11 objective. Bright-field illumination was obtained with a 200-W mercury arc lamp that was filtered with a combination of dichroic infrared-reflecting filters and broad band-pass ultraviolet-absorbing filters to prevent tissue damage and a narrow band-pass interference filter to select the mercury green line (546 nm). Illumination for fluorescence microscopy was provided by a 100-W mercury arc mounted on the sidearm of the BH2 microscope, which was also filtered by dichroic infrared-reflecting filters and ultraviolet-absorbing filters. The light from this arc passed through a green band-pass exciter filter (500-560 nm) and a high-pass dichroic mirror (cutoff wavelength = 560 nm), which reflected the exciting light (mercury green line 546 nm) down through the objective onto the subpleural microcirculation beneath the window. Emitted light passed back through the objective, the dichroic mirror, and a red high-pass barrier filter (cutoff wavelength = 590 nm). Video recordings of the subpleural microcirculation were made with a Panasonic AG7300 SVHS video recorder and a Cohu intensified charge-coupled device camera (model 5510), which was mounted on the microscope with a Nikon zoom CCTV adapter (model 79444).

Vascular occlusions. Arterial, venous, and double-occlusion maneuvers were performed in random order in each preparation with the lobe held in end expiration. Flow was occluded by stopcocks in the arterial inflow and venous outflow limbs of the perfusion circuit (Fig. 2). The stopcocks were controlled by actuators (cylinders containing a piston and rod), which closed the stopcocks when they were pressurized. Depending on the type of occlusion (arterial, venous, or double), one or both of the stopcocks were closed. Rotation of the stopcock valves interrupted flow without displacing volume from the site of occlusion. To perform an occlusion, a solenoid was energized, which pressurized the actuator(s) with compressed gas at 60 psi, closing the stopcock(s). The computer simultaneously marked time 0 in the pressure data file and activated a Panasonic WJ-810 time-date generator, which recorded elapsed time in milliseconds on the videotape. Arterial inflow to the lobe was constant during venous occlusion. Occlusions were performed in triplicate while a subpleural arteriole and venule observed with fluorescence microscopy were videotaped. The duration of each occlusion was ~3 s. Preocclusion arteriolar and venular diameters were measured from the videotaped images as described previously (13).

For the off-line velocity measurements, the videotapes were replayed, and red blood cell velocities in subpleural precapillary arterioles and postcapillary venules were calculated by measuring the distance individual fluorescently labeled red blood cells moved from one video frame to the next. For each occlusion and in each vessel, one to three cells were counted in every video frame from 1 s before occlusion to 2 s after occlusion (90 video frames, 90-270 cells/occlusion). To reduce noise, a single velocity curve for each vessel for each type of occlusion was obtained by averaging the velocity curves from each of the triplicate occlusions for that set of conditions. The curves were averaged by computing the mean of the triplicate measurements at each point in time after occlusion. Similarly, a single average pressure decay curve was obtained for each type of occlusion on each lung lobe by averaging the pressure curves from the triplicate occlusions. The measured response of the pressure-measuring system (transducer, amplifier, filter, and analog-to-digital board) to a square-wave pressure change from 20 mmHg to atmospheric pressure was >90% complete within 0.033 s or one video frame.

Model-independent analysis. The venous occlusion data were used to divide the total lobar vascular compliance into three compliances: one comprised of the compliance of arteries >40 µm (Ca), another of vessels <40 µm (Cc), and a third of veins >40 µm in diameter (Cv). If the vascular bed is visualized as a longitudinally distributed distensible system, when the outflow is occluded while the inflow is maintained at a constant rate, the rate of change in pressure at all locations within the system will be equal and the axial flow observed at any site between the inlet and the site of occlusion will be the inflow rate minus the rate of volume storage in the distensible vessels upstream from the site of observation once the quasi-steady state has been established. The rate of upstream volume storage over the total flow will be the ratio of the upstream compliance to the total compliance. If the total compliance is estimated by measuring the change in pressure resulting from the total volume stored in the system up to a given time, the actual compliance of the segments upstream and downstream from the site of observation can be estimated. In the present study, two sites along the longitudinal distribution were available for observation on the subpleural surface: the ~40-µm arterioles and venules just upstream and downstream, respectively, from the capillary bed.

It is actually the volume flows, rather than the measured velocities, that are needed to estimate the compliance distribution. Because the vessels are distensible and the pressures are continuously increasing after venous occlusion, we converted the velocities to flows by using the following relationships
<IT>v</IT>(<IT>t</IT>) = <FR><NU>F(<IT>t</IT>)</NU><DE><IT>A</IT>(<IT>t</IT>)</DE></FR> = <FR><NU>F(<IT>t</IT>)</NU><DE>&pgr;<FENCE><FR><NU><IT>D</IT>(<IT>t</IT>)</NU><DE>2</DE></FR></FENCE><SUP>2</SUP></DE></FR> (1)
where v, A, D, and F are the local velocity, vessel cross-sectional area (arterial or venous), diameter, and flow, respectively. Dividing the postocclusion (t > 0) velocity, v(t), by the preocclusion velocity, v(0), gives
<FR><NU><IT>v</IT>(<IT>t</IT>)</NU><DE><IT>v</IT>(0)</DE></FR> = <FR><NU>F(<IT>t</IT>)</NU><DE>F(0)</DE></FR> <FENCE><FR><NU><IT>D</IT>(0)</NU><DE><IT>D</IT>(<IT>t</IT>)</DE></FR></FENCE><SUP>2</SUP> (2)
Over the pressure range encompassed by the venous occlusion, 8.8-20 mmHg, D(t) can be related to D(0) by
<FR><NU><IT>D</IT>(<IT>t</IT>)</NU><DE><IT>D</IT>(0)</DE></FR> = <FR><NU>1 + &agr;Pav(<IT>t</IT>)</NU><DE>1 + &agr;Pav(0)</DE></FR> (3)
where Pav(t) = [Pa(t) + Pv(t)]/2 and alpha  is the vessel distensibility, which was previously found for the lung preparation used in the present studies to be ~0.018/mmHg for the subpleural venules and 0.031/mmHg for the arterioles (14). Substituting Eq. 3 in Eq. 2 results in the following relationship between flow, velocity, and pressure
<FR><NU>F(<IT>t</IT>)</NU><DE>F(0)</DE></FR> = <FR><NU><IT>v</IT>(<IT>t</IT>)</NU><DE><IT>v</IT>(0)</DE></FR> <FENCE><FR><NU>1 + &agr;Pav(<IT>t</IT>)</NU><DE>1 + &agr;Pav(0)</DE></FR></FENCE><SUP>2</SUP> (4)
This relationship was used to convert the velocity measurements to flows, correcting for the pressure changes that occurred after venous, arterial, or double occlusion.

Because we could only measure the diameter of and the velocity in some individual vessels of the entire parallel set of ~40-µm vessels, it was necessary to calculate fractional flows and, from them, fractional compliances. For each experiment, the flows between 0.5 and 2 s after occlusion were averaged, <OVL>F</OVL>, and divided by the preocclusion flow rates averaged from -0.5 to 0.0 s, F(0), to obtain the normalized steady-state postocclusion (t > 0) flows through the arteriole and venule [<OVL>F</OVL>a/Fa(0) and <OVL>F</OVL>v/Fv(0), respectively]. The total compliance (CT) was estimated as
C<SC>t</SC> = Ca + Cc + Cv = <FR><NU>F<SC>t</SC></NU><DE><IT>S</IT></DE></FR> (5)
where S is the slope of Pv(t) obtained by linear regression over the time interval 0.5-1.0 s after venous occlusion and FT is the lobar inflow rate. Before venous occlusion, the flow through 40-µm arterioles (Fa) and venules (Fv) is equal to the total lobar flow rate
Fa(0) = Fv(0) = F<SC>t</SC> = C<SC>t</SC><IT>S</IT> (6)
After venous occlusion, after the quasi-steady state is reached, the flow rate through the arterioles is equal to the total flow rate minus the volume stored in upstream vessels
Fa(<IT>t</IT>) = F<SC>t</SC> − Ca<IT>S</IT> (7)
Solving Eq. 5 for FT and substituting for FT in Eq. 7 gives
Fa(<IT>t</IT>) = (Ca + Cc + Cv)<IT>S</IT> − Ca<IT>S</IT> = (Cc + Cv)<IT>S</IT> (8)
Similarly, the flow rate through the venules after venous occlusion is equal to the total flow rate minus the volume stored in upstream vessels
Fv(<IT>t</IT>) = F<SC>t</SC> − (Ca + Cc)<IT>S</IT> = Cv<IT>S</IT> (9)
During the quasi-steady state, Fa(t) = <OVL>F</OVL>a and Fv(t) = <OVL>F</OVL>v. Therefore, dividing Eq. 8 by Eq. 6 gives the fractional compliance downstream from the arteriolar measurement site
<FR><NU>Fa(<IT>t</IT>)</NU><DE>Fa(0)</DE></FR> = <FR><NU><OVL>F</OVL>a</NU><DE>Fa(0)</DE></FR> = <FR><NU>Cc + Cv</NU><DE>C<SC>t</SC></DE></FR> (10)
and dividing Eq. 9 by Eq. 6 gives the fractional compliance downstream from the venular measurement site
<FR><NU>Fv(<IT>t</IT>)</NU><DE>Fv(0)</DE></FR> = <FR><NU><OVL>F</OVL>v</NU><DE>Fv(0)</DE></FR> = <FR><NU>Cv</NU><DE>C<SC>t</SC></DE></FR> (11)
The occlusion time intercepts, Pai and Pvi, of the simultaneously measured Pa and Pv after venous occlusion were obtained by linear regression of Pa(t) and Pv(t) over the time interval 0.5-1.0 s. These intercepts were used along with the compliances to put bounds on the resistances upstream from, between, and downstream from the 40-µm arterioles and venules, as previously described (3, 4, 7).

Model-dependent analysis. The above calculations are model independent, in that no specific compartmental arrangement of resistances and compliances is assumed. In addition, they utilize only the quasi-steady-state flow and pressure data from the venous-occlusion maneuver. Compartmental model representations can also be used to interpret the transient portions of the postocclusion data. Audi et al. (1, 2) provided the rationale for using a 3C2R model representation of the lobar vasculature for interpreting the occlusion pressure data (Fig. 1). Conceptually, the upstream resistance (R1) was visualized as representing primarily the resistance of the small arteries, and the downstream resistance (R2) was visualized as primarily the resistance of the small veins, with any capillary resistance contributing approximately equally to both R1 and R2 (Fig. 1). By use of the anatomically defined compliances from the arteriolar and venular flow measurements (Ca, Cc, and Cv) as model inputs for the upstream (C1), middle (C2), and downstream (C3) compliances, respectively, the 3C2R model resistances were calculated (16) by using the double-occlusion pressure (Pd)
R<SUB>2</SUB> = <FR><NU>[Pd − Pv(0)]C<SC>t</SC> − [Pa(0) − Pv(0)]C<SUB>1</SUB></NU><DE>F<SC>t</SC>C<SUB>2</SUB></DE></FR> (12)
and
R<SUB>1</SUB> + R<SUB>2</SUB> = <FR><NU>Pa(0) − Pv(0)</NU><DE>F<SC>t</SC></DE></FR> (13)
where Pa(0) and Pv(0) are the preocclusion steady-state Pa and Pv, respectively. The 3 C's used as model inputs were obtained by first estimating CT from the average pressure data by using Eq. 5. The values of C1, C2, and C3 were then calculated as the products of the fractional compliances and CT (Table 1).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Direct measurements from the study

Once the model resistances were calculated, we investigated to what extent the arteriolar and venular flows measured during venous, arterial, and double occlusions were consistent with the compliances and model resistances derived from the venous occlusion flows and double-occlusion pressure. This was accomplished by numerically solving the following governing differential equations for the 3C2R model (16) describing the time variations in Pa(t), Pc(t), and Pv(t)
C<SUB>1</SUB> <FR><NU>dPa</NU><DE>d<IT>t</IT></DE></FR> = F<SC>t</SC> − <FENCE><FR><NU>Pa − Pc</NU><DE>R<SUB>1</SUB></DE></FR></FENCE> (14)
C<SUB>2</SUB> <FR><NU>dPc</NU><DE>d<IT>t</IT></DE></FR> = <FENCE><FR><NU>Pa − Pc</NU><DE>R<SUB>1</SUB></DE></FR></FENCE> − <FENCE><FR><NU>Pc − Pv</NU><DE>R<SUB>2</SUB></DE></FR></FENCE> (15)
C<SUB>3</SUB> <FR><NU>dPv</NU><DE>d<IT>t</IT></DE></FR> = <FENCE><FR><NU>Pc − Pv</NU><DE>R<SUB>2</SUB></DE></FR></FENCE> − F<SUB>res</SUB> (16)
with the initial (t = 0) conditions Pa(0) = Pv(0) + FT(R1 + R2) and Pc(0) = Pv(0) + FTR2, where Fres is the flow into the reservoir.

Equations 14-16 were solved numerically for Pa(t), Pc(t), and Pv(t) after Fres was set to 0 for venous occlusion and FT = Fres = 0 for double occlusion. For arterial occlusion, FT was set to 0, and only Eqs. 14 and 15 were solved for Pa(t) and Pc(t), with Pv(t) set equal to the measured postocclusion venous pressure. These pressures were then used to calculate the postocclusion arteriolar and venular flows
Fa(<IT>t</IT>) = <FR><NU>Pa(<IT>t</IT>) − Pc(<IT>t</IT>)</NU><DE>R<SUB>1</SUB></DE></FR> (17)
and
Fv(<IT>t</IT>) = <FR><NU>Pc(<IT>t</IT>) − Pv(<IT>t</IT>)</NU><DE>R<SUB>2</SUB></DE></FR> (18)

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Direct measurements. The normalized arteriolar and venular velocities from the individual experiments measured during the occlusion maneuvers are presented in Figs. 3-5. The averages of the pressure curves obtained during the occlusion maneuvers are shown in Fig. 6. The mean values of the various measurements obtained during the preocclusion period or from the quasi-steady states during venous or double occlusion are summarized in Table 1.


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Red blood cell velocities, v(t), before and after venous occlusion as a fraction of their mean velocity during preocclusion measurement period, v(0). Lines, measurements from a single ~40-µm arteriole (A) and venule (B) in each of 6 lobes. Time 0 (vertical dashed line) is time of occlusion. Filled bar on x-axis represents quasi-steady-state data used to calculate compliance.


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Red blood cell velocities, v(t), before and after arterial occlusion as a fraction of their mean velocity during preocclusion measurement period, v(0). Lines, measurements from a single ~40-µm arteriole (A) and venule (B) in each of 6 lobes. Time 0 (vertical dashed line) is time of occlusion.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Red blood cell velocities, v(t), before and after double occlusion as a fraction of their mean velocity during preocclusion measurement period, v(0). Lines, measurements from a single ~40-µm arteriole (A) and venule (B) in each of 6 lobes. Time 0 (vertical dashed line) is time of occlusion.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Arterial pressure, Pa, and venous pressure, Pv, before and after arterial, venous, and double occlusion. Curves are averages of mean pressure curves from each of 6 lobes. Data were digitally filtered using a Butterworth low-pass filter with a cutoff frequency (-3 dB) of 10 Hz and zero-phase shift (2). Filled bar on x-axis represents quasi-steady-state data used to calculate compliance.

Model-independent analysis. To carry out the analysis of these measurements, the velocities were converted to normalized flows (Fig. 7) using Eq. 4. The fractional compliances estimated from these flows (Eqs. 10 and 11) are shown in Table 2. The Cc fraction was significantly larger than either Ca or Cv (P < 0.01, analysis of variance followed by Newman-Keuls test). The upper and lower bounds placed on the resistances partitioned by the 40-µm arterioles and venules are also shown in Table 2.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Calculated flow rates, F(t), before and after venous occlusion as a fraction of mean flow rate during the preocclusion measurement period, F(0). Flows were calculated from red blood cell velocities through ~40-µm subpleural arterioles (thin solid lines, n = 6) and ~40-µm subpleural venules (thin dotted lines, n = 6). A single arteriole and a single venule were measured in each of 6 lobes. Thick lines, 3C2R predictions for flows through resistances upstream and downstream from C2, with R and C values estimated from venous and double occlusions. Time 0 (vertical dashed line) is time of occlusion. Filled bar on x-axis represents quasi-steady-state data used to calculate compliance.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.   Model-independent parameters

Model-dependent analysis. When the 3C2R model and Pd were used to interpret the data, R1/RT was nearly equal to R2/RT (Table 3). The simulated venous and double-occlusion pressure curves, generated by solving Eqs. 14-16 for Pa(t) and Pv(t), and the simulated arterial-occlusion pressure curves, generated by solving Eqs. 14 and 15 for Pa(t), are shown in Fig. 8. The arteriolar and venular flows predicted by Eqs. 17 and 18 after arterial and double occlusion followed the trend in the measured flows to the extent shown in Figs. 9 and 10.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3.   Model-dependent parameters


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Arterial pressure, Pa, and venous pressure, Pv, before and after arterial, venous, and double occlusion. Thick lines, pressures predicted by 3C2R model using model parameters estimated as indicated in text; thin lines, average of actual mean pressure curves from each of 6 lobes as shown in Fig. 5. Filled bar on x-axis represents quasi-steady-state data used to calculate compliance.


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Calculated flow rates, F(t), before and after arterial occlusion as a fraction of mean flow rate during preocclusion measurement period, F(0). Flows were calculated from red blood cell velocities through ~40-µm subpleural arterioles (thin solid lines) and ~40-µm subpleural venules (thin dotted lines). A single arteriole and a single venule were measured in each of 6 lobes. Thick lines, 3C2R predictions for flows through resistances upstream and downstream from C2, with R and C values estimated from venous and double occlusions. Time 0 (vertical dashed line) is time of occlusion.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Calculated flow rates, F(t), before and after double occlusion as a fraction of mean flow rate during preocclusion measurement period, F(0). Flows were calculated from red blood cell velocities through ~40-µm subpleural arterioles (thin solid lines) and ~40-µm subpleural venules (thin dotted lines). A single arteriole and a single venule were measured in each of 6 lobes. Thick lines, 3C2R predictions for flows through resistances upstream and downstream from C2, with R and C values estimated from venous and double occlusions. Time 0 (vertical dashed line) is time of occlusion.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The key observation in this study was a large decrease in venular flow, but only a small fall in arteriolar flow, after venous occlusion. Thus, after occlusion, a relatively small fraction of the flow continued into veins >40 µm and a relatively small fraction was diverted into distending arteries >40 µm. The largest fraction, ~65% of the flow, increased the volume of vessels <40 µm, presumably mostly capillaries. Therefore, the capillaries contained the largest fraction of lobar vascular compliance. The relatively rapid fall in arteriolar flow in comparison to venular flow after arterial occlusion indicates that the time constant for emptying vessels upstream from the 40-µm arterioles was small in comparison to that upstream from the 40-µm venules, again consistent with a relatively small fraction of the compliance in the arteries compared with the capillaries. Unlike previous occlusion studies, our video-microscopic observations were made at specific anatomic locations (40-µm-diameter arterioles and venules), which allowed us to partition compliance into anatomically defined segments.

The relative arterial-capillary-venous distribution of compliance implied by these results of 8:65:27 can be compared with compliance distributions obtained for the intrapulmonary vessels of the lungs by other methods, which include 30:49:21 for the dog lung lobe vascular bed (7) and 7:79:14 for the whole dog lung vascular bed (5). Consistent with previous studies, the results of the present study lead to the conclusion that the arteries and veins account for smaller fractions of the total intrapulmonary vascular compliance than the capillaries. Thus the results further support the concept that the intrapulmonary vascular compliance is concentrated in the capillary bed.

The compliances estimated from the venous occlusion flows are based on the concept that the fractional changes in flows in the subpleural vessels are close to those in similarly sized vessels in the interior of the lungs. This is a difficult assumption to test directly. It is conceivable that at least one reason for any differences between these estimates for arterial, capillary, and venous compliances based on the subpleural vessel flows and those estimated by other means, for what might be assumed to be the same vascular segments (5, 7), might be the result of deviations from this assumption. However, the basic agreement between the results of this study and those obtained by very different methods (5, 7) supports the concept that the surface arterioles and venules reflect the behavior of the internal vessels. Also supporting this concept, Short et al. (17) found that recruitment of subpleural capillaries in the rat lung paralleled recruitment of interior capillaries over a range of pressures that spanned low zone 3 to high zone 1. Finally, Hillier et al. (15), using fluorescent microspheres, found no redistribution of flow between subpleural and interior vessels in the isolated canine lobe during airway hypoxia. Although these studies do not directly compare subpleural with interior flow changes after vessel occlusion, they demonstrate that subpleural perfusion parallels interior perfusion over a wide range of hemodynamic conditions.

We divided total pulmonary vascular compliance into three segments bounded by 40-µm arterioles and venules, because these were the vessels that were observable on the surface of the lung. Because one cannot assume that compliance is evenly distributed over the entire diameter range, these bounds do not tell us anything about the distribution of compliance within these three segments. Instead, the sites where the measurements were made put lower bounds on the diameter of arteries and veins contributing to the compliance of the upstream and downstream segments, respectively. Likewise, the measurement sites put upper bounds on the size of vessels contributing to the compliance of the middle segment. Nevertheless, the available anatomic evidence (8) suggests that there is little volume and, therefore, little compliance in noncapillary vessels <40 µm. Most of the compliance in the middle segment, therefore, is probably in the capillaries.

If the pressure data are included in the analysis, the occlusion maneuvers also provide information about how resistance is distributed with respect to compliance. The bounds placed on resistance associated with each of the three compliances using the quasi-steady-state data, i.e., the model-independent interpretation, are rather wide. The most important conclusion from these bounds is that no more than ~50% of the total resistance is associated with vessels <40 µm. If, instead, the 3C2R model is used to interpret the data, the two resistances, R1 and R2, are nearly equal under the conditions of this study. Like the finding that the major locus of compliance is in the capillaries, this distribution of resistance is consistent with previous interpretations based on this model (2). More importantly, this model also provides a means for simulating the time course of flows immediately after arterial, venous, and double occlusion that appear to be reasonably consistent with the observed flow transients (Figs. 9 and 10). Thus, even with all the resistance in the model lumped downstream from C1 and upstream from C3, the rate of fall in simulated arterial flow after arterial occlusion and the rate of fall in simulated arterial and venous flows after double occlusion (i.e., the flow transients) are at least as rapid as the measured rates. Alternatively, if a significant fraction of the total resistance had been upstream from C1 or downstream from C3, the rates of decrease in flows would have been expected to be even faster. Thus these transient flow data are consistent with most of C1 and C3 being located upstream from any resistance in arteries >40 µm and downstream from any resistance in veins >40 µm.

In summary, we have obtained anatomically referenced measurements of flow after occlusion of the venous outflow which indicate that the bulk of pulmonary vascular compliance is in the capillary bed. These compliance measurements, when combined with the 3C2R model (2) and flow measurements after occlusion of arterial inflow and simultaneous occlusion of arterial inflow and venous outflow, suggest that most of the compliance in arteries of >40 µm is upstream from any resistance in these vessels and the compliance in veins of >40 µm is downstream from any resistance in these vessels.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank Dr. Tawfik S. Hakim for assistance with pilot studies.

    FOOTNOTES

This work was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grants HL-36033 and HL-19298 and the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Address for reprint requests: R. G. Presson, Jr., Riley Children's Hospital, 702 Barnhill Dr., Rm. 2001, Indianapolis, IN 46202-5200.

Received 25 September 1996; accepted in final form 10 September 1997.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

  1. Audi, S. H., C. A. Dawson, and J. H. Linehan. A method for analysis of pulmonary arterial and venous occlusion data. J. Appl. Physiol. 73: 1190-1195, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  2. Audi, S. H., C. A. Dawson, D. A. Rickaby, and J. H. Linehan. Localization of the sites of pulmonary vasomotion by use of arterial and venous occlusion. J. Appl. Physiol. 70: 2126-2136, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  3. Bronikowski, T. A., C. A. Dawson, and J. H. Linehan. Limits on the continuous distribution of pulmonary vascular resistance versus compliance from outflow occlusion. Microvasc. Res. 30: 306-313, 1985[Medline].
  4. Bronikowski, T. A., J. H. Linehan, and C. A. Dawson. A model of the vascular resistance and compliance distribution in a lung lobe. Microvasc. Res. 28: 289-310, 1984[Medline].
  5. Brower, R. G., R. A. Wise, C. Hassapoyannes, M. Hausknecht, and S. Permutt. Longitudinal distribution of vascular compliance in the canine lung. J. Appl. Physiol. 61: 240-247, 1986[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  6. Dawson, C. A., J. H. Linehan, and D. A. Rickaby. Pulmonary microcirculatory hemodynamics. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 384: 90-106, 1982[Medline].
  7. Dawson, C. A., D. A. Rickaby, J. H. Linehan, and T. A. Bronikowski. Distributions of vascular volume and compliance in the lung. J. Appl. Physiol. 64: 266-273, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  8. Gan, R. Z., and R. T. Yen. Vascular impedance analysis in dog lung with detailed morphometric and elasticity data. J. Appl. Physiol. 77: 706-717, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  9. Hakim, T. S. Criteria for analysis of arterial and venous occlusion. J. Appl. Physiol. 70: 665-675, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  10. Hakim, T. S. Instant of vascular occlusion defined with laser-Doppler flowmetry. J. Appl. Physiol. 73: 284-289, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  11. Hakim, T. S., and S. Kelly. Occlusion pressures vs. micropipette pressures in the pulmonary circulation. J. Appl. Physiol. 67: 1277-1285, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  12. Hakim, T. S., R. P. Michel, and H. K. Chang. Partitioning of pulmonary vascular resistance in dogs by arterial and venous occlusion. J. Appl. Physiol. 52: 710-715, 1982[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  13. Hanger, C. C., S. C. Hillier, R. G. Presson, Jr., R. W. Glenny, and W. W. Wagner, Jr. Measuring pulmonary microvessel diameters using video image analysis. J. Appl. Physiol. 79: 526-532, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  14. Hillier, S. C., P. S. Godbey, C. C. Hanger, J. A. Graham, R. G. Presson, Jr., O. Okada, J. H. Linehan, C. A. Dawson, and W. W. Wagner, Jr. Direct measurement of pulmonary microvascular distensibility. J. Appl. Physiol. 75: 2106-2111, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  15. Hillier, S. C., J. A. Graham, C. C. Hanger, P. S. Godbey, R. W. Glenny, and W. W. Wagner, Jr. Hypoxic vasoconstriction in pulmonary arterioles and venules. J. Appl. Physiol. 82: 1084-1090, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  16. Linehan, J. H., C. A. Dawson, and D. A. Rickaby. Distribution of vascular resistance and compliance in a dog lung lobe. J. Appl. Physiol. 53: 158-168, 1982[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  17. Short, A. C., M. L. Montoya, S. A. Gebb, R. G. Presson, Jr., W. W. Wagner, Jr., and R. L. Capen. Pulmonary capillary diameters and recruitment characteristics in subpleural and interior networks. J. Appl. Physiol. 80: 1568-1573, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  18. Townsley, M. I., R. J. Korthuis, B. Rippe, J. C. Parker, and A. E. Taylor. Validation of double vascular occlusion method for Pc in lung and skeletal muscle. J. Appl. Physiol. 61: 127-132, 1986[Abstract/Free Full Text].
  19. Unthank, J. L., J. M. Lash, J. C. Nixon, R. A. Sidner, and H. G. Bohlen. Evaluation of carbocyanine-labeled erythrocytes for microvascular measurements. Microvasc. Res. 45: 193-210, 1993[Medline].
  20. Wagner, W. W., Jr. Pulmonary microcirculatory observations in vivo under physiological conditions. J. Appl. Physiol. 26: 375-377, 1969[Free Full Text].
  21. West, J. B., C. T. Dollery, and A. Naimark. Distribution of blood flow in isolated lung: relation to vascular and alveolar pressures. J. Appl. Physiol. 19: 713-724, 1964[Abstract/Free Full Text].


The Journal of Applied Physiology 84(1):303-310



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. J. Yun, P. Y. Lee, and A. N. Gerber
Integrating systems biology and medical imaging: understanding disease distribution in the lung model.
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2006; 186(4): 925 - 930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
A. Kluge, T. Dill, O. Ekinci, J. Hansel, C. Hamm, H. F. Pitschner, and G. Bachmann
Decreased Pulmonary Perfusion in Pulmonary Vein Stenosis After Radiofrequency Ablation: Assessment With Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging
Chest, August 1, 2004; 126(2): 428 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. L. Conhaim, K. E. Watson, D. M. Heisey, G. E. Leverson, and B. A. Harms
Thromboxane receptor analog, U-46619, redistributes pulmonary microvascular perfusion in isolated rat lungs
J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2004; 96(1): 245 - 252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
D. Negrini, A. Candiani, F. Boschetti, B. Crisafulli, M. Del Fabbro, D. Bettinelli, and G. Miserocchi
Pulmonary microvascular and perivascular interstitial geometry during development of mild hydraulic edema
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, December 1, 2001; 281(6): L1464 - L1471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
E. M. Jaryszak, W. A. Baumgartner Jr, A. J. Peterson, R. G. Presson Jr, R. W. Glenny, and W. W. Wagner Jr
Physiology of a Microgravity Environment: Selected Contribution: Measuring the response time of pulmonary capillary recruitment to sudden flow changes
J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2000; 89(3): 1233 - 1238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
C. A. Dawson, G. S. Krenz, K. L. Karau, S. T. Haworth, C. C. Hanger, and J. H. Linehan
Structure-function relationships in the pulmonary arterial tree
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 1999; 86(2): 569 - 583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Presson Jr., R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Dawson, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Presson Jr., R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Dawson, C. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS