Journal of Applied Physiology Millar Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 83: 2091-2097, 1997;
8750-7587/97 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ryan, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bishop, V. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ryan, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bishop, V. S.

Vol. 83, Issue 6, 2091-2097, December 1997

Arterial baroreflex modulation of heat-induced vasodilation in the rabbit ear

Kathy L. Ryan, W. Fred Taylor, and Vernon S. Bishop

Department of Physiology, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas 78284-7764

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Ryan, Kathy L., W. Fred Taylor, and Vernon S. Bishop. Arterial baroreflex modulation of heat-induced vasodilation in the rabbit ear. J. Appl. Physiol. 83(6): 2091-2097, 1997.---The purpose of this study was to determine whether nonthermal baroreflexes arising from cardiopulmonary and/or arterial baroreceptors modulate rabbit ear blood flow (EBF) during hyperthermia. Intact and sinoaortic-denervated (SAD) rabbits were chronically instrumented with a Doppler ultrasonic flow probe for measurement of EBF velocity (kHz). During whole body heating in conscious rabbits, EBF and ear vascular conductance (EVC) increased as core temperature increased until maximal plateau levels of EBF and EVC were reached. The maximal plateau level of EVC attained during heat stress was lower in SAD than in intact rabbits. Subsequent intrapericardial administration of procaine at maximal EBF blocked cardiac afferents but did not alter EVC in either animal group. In a second experiment, ramp decreases in mean arterial pressure were produced by vena caval occlusion at maximal EBF. In intact rabbits, EBF and EVC decreased linearly as mean arterial pressure fell, but EBF and EVC did not decrease during vena caval occlusion in SAD rabbits. Thus neither pharmacological nor mechanical unloading of cardiac baroreceptors results in reflex vasoconstriction in the heat-stressed rabbit ear. However, baroreflexes arising from arterial baroreceptors may modulate EBF in heat-stressed rabbits.

temperature regulation; blood pressure regulation; baroreflexes; skin blood flow; conscious rabbits


INTRODUCTION

ALTHOUGH SOME DOUBTS linger (20, 31), the preponderance of evidence indicates that baroreflexes participate in the regulation of the cutaneous circulation in humans (13, 28). In normothermic humans, baroreceptor unloading produces cutaneous vasoconstriction (2, 9, 29, 34). The ability of the baroreflex to modulate skin blood flow (SkBF) persists during hyperthermia (7, 14, 16), thereby facilitating the maintenance of blood pressure in the face of simultaneous challenges to thermoregulation and blood pressure regulation. Thus the baroreflex competes with thermoregulatory reflexes to produce an integrated cutaneous vascular response to combined challenges in humans.

In animal models, however, evidence concerning baroreflex control of the cutaneous circulation is not as clear. In cats, cutaneous sympathetic nerve activity is not clearly synchronous with the cardiac cycle (11, 12, 17, 23), leading some to conclude that the cutaneous circulation is not under baroreflex control. However, hemorrhage is clearly associated with cutaneous vasoconstriction in mice (36), rats (25, 27, 30, 32), rabbits (21), and dogs (3, 4). Early reports suggested that this cutaneous vasoconstriction is the result of elevated levels of catecholamines (3) or vasopressin (27) rather than direct baroreceptor-mediated alterations in sympathetic outflow. In a more recent study, however, O'Leary and Johnson (25) clearly demonstrated that vasoconstriction of the tail occurs during hemorrhage in normothermic and hyperthermic rats and that this vasoconstriction is of neural origin and not solely dependent on circulating vasoconstrictor agents. These investigators thus concluded that baroreflexes directly control sympathetic outflow to the tail vasculature.

In a separate but related issue, it is also unclear whether baroreceptor input acts to modulate peripheral vascular responses to heat stress. In anesthetized dogs, abolition of arterial and cardiopulmonary baroreceptor reflexes failed to alter increases in hindpaw blood flow during heating of the spinal cord (5). Furthermore, acute removal of arterial baroreceptor input did not modify decreases in sympathetic nerve activity to the skin produced by thermal challenge in anesthetized cats (22). Thermoregulatory cutaneous vasodilation in the absence of baroreceptor input has not been examined further. Recently, it has been demonstrated that arterial blood pressure, heart rate (HR), and visceral vascular resistance responses to nonexertional heat stress are altered in conscious rats lacking intact arterial baroreflexes and that sinoaortic deafferentation reduces thermal tolerance (18).

Investigation of the interaction between thermoregulatory and baroreceptor control of SkBF has been hindered by the lack of an animal that closely models the human in terms of the nervous control of SkBF. As previously noted, the tail of the rat responds to baroreflexes during normothermia and hyperthermia (25), but the rat tail does not possess an active neurogenic vasodilator system (28). In contrast, an active vasodilator system mediates at least 90% of the total human cutaneous vascular response to hyperthermia (28). Recently, we reported that ~80% of the increase in rabbit ear blood flow (EBF) during hyperthermia is the result of activation of sympathetic vasodilator nerves (33). For this reason, the rabbit ear may be a useful model to study interactions between thermoregulatory and nonthermoregulatory reflexes. Therefore, this study was designed to determine whether the rabbit ear vasculature is on the efferent arm of the baroreflex. Specifically, we sought to determine whether 1) arterial baroreceptor input modulates cardiovascular and thermoregulatory responses to heat stress and 2) cardiopulmonary and arterial baroreceptors modulate EBF in heat-stressed rabbits.


METHODS

Seventeen New Zealand White rabbits (1.8-3.0 kg) of either sex were housed in individual cages and maintained on a 12:12-h light-dark cycle. Animals were given free access to water and standard rabbit chow, supplemented by fresh cabbage and carrots. All animal care and use were in accordance with National Institutes of Health guidelines (20a).

Surgical Procedures

All surgical procedures were performed aseptically. Rabbits were anesthetized with "rabbit cocktail" [43% ketamine, 14% chlorpromazine (Thorazine), and 43% xylazine], intubated, and mechanically ventilated with room air. A right thoracotomy was performed through the fourth intercostal space for placement of a perivascular balloon occluder around the inferior vena cava and a silicone rubber catheter in the pericardial sac. The occluder tubing and the pericardial catheter were routed subcutaneously and exteriorized at the back of the neck.

After a recovery period of at least 2 wk, the rabbits were again anesthetized, and a silicone rubber-tipped catheter was placed into the ascending aorta via a femoral artery for the measurement of arterial blood pressure. At the same time, a closed-tip catheter was placed alongside a common carotid artery for the later insertion of a copper-constantan thermocouple (model IT-18, Physitemp Instruments) to measure core temperature (Tc). A Doppler ultrasonic flow probe was also placed around a central ear artery for the measurement of EBF. All catheters and flow probe wires were exteriorized at the back of the neck. The arterial catheter was heparinized every other day. An antibiotic (amoxicillin, 75 mg/kg) was administered for up to 5 days after each surgical procedure. Rabbits were allowed 3-4 days to recover from surgery and were trained daily to sit quietly in a standard rabbit restrainer.

Six rabbits underwent sinoaortic denervation (SAD) before thoracotomy. In these rabbits the aortic depressor and carotid sinus nerves were exposed through a midcervical incision. Aortic depressor nerves were cut at the level of the nodose ganglia. The bifurcations of the external and internal carotid arteries were isolated and stripped of all nerve fibers. The region of the carotid sinus was then painted with 10% phenol. All animals were allowed to recover for at least 2 wk before undergoing further surgery.

After the animals recovered from catheter implantation, the efficacy of the SAD procedure was assessed by acutely increasing arterial blood pressure via a bolus intravenous infusion (through a marginal ear vein) of phenylephrine. Denervation was considered complete if HR decreased <= 20 beats/min in response to a 40-mmHg increase in mean arterial pressure (MAP). All the SAD rabbits used in this study completed this test successfully.

Recordings

EBF, blood pressure, and HR were continuously recorded during all experiments on a polygraph (model 611, Beckman). Arterial blood pressure was measured with a transducer (model CDX2, Cobe). Instantaneous HR was determined by a cardiotachometer (model 9857b, Beckman) triggered from the arterial pressure pulse. EBF was measured by a Doppler ultrasonic flowmeter (C. Hartley, Baylor College of Medicine). Mean EBF and MAP were recorded by passing the pulsatile signals through low-pass filters. Ear vascular conductance (EVC) was calculated by dividing EBF by MAP. Tc was measured by connecting the thermocouple to a 37.0°C electronic reference junction, which provided a digital readout; Tc was noted every 5 min throughout the experiment. Outputs from the Beckman recorder were connected to an analog-to-digital converter (MacLab, WPI), and digitized values were displayed and recorded using a Macintosh microcomputer.

Experimental Protocols

On the day of the experiment, the conscious rabbit was placed in a restrainer and wrapped in a rubber pad through which warmed water could be circulated. The rabbit was then allowed to stabilize for 20-30 min. After this control period, whole body heating (WBH) was begun by circulating warm (41°C) water through the rubber pad. The time required for EBF to reach a maximum plateau level ranged from 40 to 120 min. This plateau level was taken to be the maximal response to WBH, because further minor increases in Tc failed to produce further increments in EBF. At this point, Tc was maintained at a relatively constant level by adjusting the temperature of the water circulating through the pad. On completion of experimental manipulations, WBH was ended, and the rabbit was exposed to ambient temperature during a recovery period of ~30 min.

Protocol 1. This protocol was designed to determine whether pharmacological blockade of cardiac afferents produces reflex vasoconstriction in the rabbit ear during thermal stress. It was performed on rabbits with intact arterial baroreflexes (n = 6) and on those without arterial baroreflexes (SAD, n = 4).

On the morning of the experiment, the rabbit was placed in the restrainer and allowed to stabilize while MAP and HR were recorded. Veratridine (20 µg/kg) was then administered intrapericardially; this dose of veratridine typically decreased MAP by 15-35 mmHg. The rabbit was then removed from the restrainer and returned to its cage. At least 2 h later, the rabbit was again placed in the restrainer, and after a control period, WBH was begun. Once maximal EBF levels were reached and maintained, the local anesthetic procainamide HCl (2%, 1 ml) was administered intrapericardially. Cardiac autonomic blockade was maintained for at least 30 min by further administration of 0.1-ml increments of procainamide at 15-min intervals. At the end of this period, veratridine (20 µg/kg) was once again infused into the pericardial sac to test the efficacy of the blockade. Blockade was considered complete if MAP was unaltered by this second dose of veratridine. Administration of procainamide in such a fashion anesthetizes afferent and efferent innervation to the heart (8).

Protocol 2. This protocol sought to determine whether mechanical unloading of arterial and cardiopulmonary baroreceptors during WBH results in reflex vasoconstriction in the ear. Again, this protocol was performed in rabbits with intact arterial baroreceptors (n = 6) and in SAD rabbits (n = 6). One of the intact rabbits was subjected to protocols 1 and 2; four of the SAD rabbits performed both protocols.

Rabbits were placed in the restrainer, and after a control period, WBH was performed. When maximal EBF values were attained, ramp decreases in MAP were produced by progressive inflation of the vena caval occluder over a 5-min period. At least three vena caval occlusions were performed during WBH, with a stabilization period of at least 10 min between each occlusion. Data derived from these three periods of occlusion were averaged to yield mean values of each measured parameter for each animal.

Necropsy

After the completion of experiments, rabbits were euthanized by an overdose of pentobarbital sodium. In all rabbits, visual inspection verified that the tip of the catheter was properly positioned within the pericardium.

Statistical Analysis

To determine the effects of WBH per se on intact and SAD rabbits, data derived from both protocols were pooled for each group. Student's t-test was used to compare times required for maximal vasodilation, rates of heating, and thresholds for vasodilation between groups (37). A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures was applied to determine differences in preheat and peak heat values within and between each group (37). This was followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls multiple-comparison test where appropriate (37). To determine differences between groups over time during the initial phases of WBH (Fig. 1), a two-way ANOVA followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls test was also applied.
Fig. 1. Effects of whole body heating in intact (n = 11) and sinoaortic-denervated (SAD, n = 6) rabbits. Pooled data were derived from both protocols during initial phase of heating (i.e., before drug administration or vena caval occlusion). Final point illustrated for each group is that at which intrapericardial infusion of procainamide or vena caval occlusion began in some members of that group. Tc, core temperature; bpm, Beats/min. * Significantly different (P < 0.05) from intact rabbits.
[View Larger Version of this Image (27K GIF file)]

To determine the effects of procaine administration during WBH (protocol 1), a randomized block ANOVA with repeated measures was followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test.

For the experiments of protocol 2, EBF, EVC, and HR values during vena caval occlusion were first plotted vs. MAP. Linear regression analysis was then applied, yielding regression coefficients (slopes) and y-intercept values for each relationship in each rabbit. These raw values describing the individual lines for each rabbit were then averaged, yielding mean regression coefficients and y-intercept values for each group (i.e., intact and SAD rabbits). Student's t-test was then used to determine statistical differences between the line descriptor values from intact and SAD rabbits (37). In all statistical tests, P < 0.05 was considered significant. Values are means ± SE.


RESULTS

Responses to WBH

Normothermic (pre-WBH) levels of Tc, HR, EBF, and EVC were similar in intact and SAD rabbits (Table 1, Fig. 1). However, MAP was higher in SAD than in intact rabbits. Figure 1 illustrates the increases in EBF and EVC in response to increasing Tc during the initial phase of heating. During the early period of WBH shown in Fig. 1, there were no significant differences in Tc, EBF, and EVC at any of the time points between the two groups of animals. Figure 1 includes only time points during which each member of the group was exposed to WBH in the absence of procainamide infusion or vena caval occlusion; because of the range of WBH exposure times required to attain maximal ear vasodilation, the final time point graphed in intact and SAD rabbits thus differs and reflects the animal with the lowest WBH exposure time to reach this point in each group. The Tc threshold for ear vasodilation was 40.30 ± 0.16°C in intact rabbits and 40.28 ± 0.28°C in SAD rabbits; again, these values did not differ statistically. Subsequently, EBF increased to a similar plateau level in both groups (Table 1). Very importantly, however, the maximal level of EVC achieved was significantly lower in SAD rabbits (Table 1). The time of WBH exposure required to reach maximal ear vasodilation in intact and SAD rabbits was 66 ± 7 and 61 ± 8 min, respectively; these values were not statistically different. Furthermore, the absence of arterial baroreceptor input did not alter the Tc at which maximal vasodilation occurred (Table 1) or the rate of Tc increase: 0.024 ± 0.004 and 0.026 ± 0.003°C/min for intact and SAD rabbits, respectively. The pre-WBH difference in MAP between SAD and intact rabbits was maintained during WBH, inasmuch as WBH did not alter the control value of this variable in either group (Table 1, Fig. 1). HR did not significantly increase during WBH within either group, although HR values in SAD rabbits during WBH were slightly but significantly greater than those in intact rabbits (Table 1, Fig. 1).

Table  1.   Hemodynamic levels and Tc before and during WBH in intact and SAD rabbits
n Tc, °C MAP, mmHg HR, beats/min EBF, kHz EVC, kHz/100 mmHg

Pre-WBH
Intact 11 39.43 ± 0.10 89 ± 4 271 ± 14 0.34 ± 0.07 0.37 ± 0.07
SAD 6 39.20 ± 0.15 114 ± 5* 273 ± 11 0.46 ± 0.06 0.42 ± 0.06
WBH
Intact 11 40.93 ± 0.21* 88 ± 3 246 ± 5 11.52 ± 1.00* 13.01 ± 0.96*
SAD 6 40.89 ± 0.25dagger 114 ± 6Dagger 300 ± 9Dagger 10.41 ± 1.33dagger 9.24 ± 1.21dagger , Dagger

Values are means ± SE; data are pooled from both protocols. n, No. of rabbits; SAD, sinoaortic denervated; WBH, whole body heating; Tc, core temperature; MAP, mean arterial pressure; HR, heart rate; EBF, ear blood flow; EVC, ear vascular conductance. * P < 0.05 compared with pre-WBH value in intact rabbits. dagger P < 0.05 compared with pre-WBH value in SAD rabbits. Dagger P < 0.05 compared with WBH value in intact rabbits.

Protocol 1

Intrapericardial administration of local anesthetic at maximal ear vasodilation during WBH failed to alter EBF, MAP, or EVC in intact rabbits (Fig. 2). In SAD rabbits, intrapericardial procainamide produced a significant decrease in EBF but only after a delay of 30 min (Fig. 3). This slight decrease in EBF was the result of a reduction in MAP, because EVC did not change after procainamide treatment. In all animals, veratridine challenge 30 min after procainamide treatment failed to alter MAP (data not shown), indicating complete blockade of cardiac afferents.
Fig. 2. Effects of intrapericardial procainamide HCl (2%) administration during whole body heating (WBH) in intact rabbits (n = 6). Ctl, normothermic (control) values immediately before onset of WBH. Between Ctl and time 0, WBH was performed (dashed line). At time 0, procaine was introduced into pericardial sac, and cardiac afferent blockade was maintained for 30 min.
[View Larger Version of this Image (16K GIF file)]


Fig. 3. Effects of intrapericardial procainamide HCl (2%) administration during WBH in SAD rabbits (n = 6). Ctl, normothermic (control) values immediately before onset of WBH. Between Ctl and time 0, WBH was performed (dashed line). At time 0, procaine was introduced into pericardial sac, and blockade was maintained for 30 min. * Significantly different (P < 0.05) from time 0.
[View Larger Version of this Image (18K GIF file)]

Protocol 2

The linear regression coefficients of the EBF-MAP, EVC-MAP, and HR-MAP relationships produced by vena caval occlusion during WBH were significantly lower in SAD than in intact rabbits (Table 2, Fig. 4). Indeed, the slope of the EVC-MAP relationship in SAD rabbits was not statistically different from 0. EBF and EVC decreased as MAP fell in rabbits with intact arterial baroreflexes. Simultaneously, HR reflexly increased during vena caval occlusion in intact rabbits. In contrast, neither EBF nor EVC fell during MAP decreases in rabbits without arterial baroreflexes. Furthermore, the reflex increase in HR that normally accompanies a depression in MAP was dramatically reduced in SAD rabbits.

Table  2.   y-Intercepts, slopes, and r2 values from linear regression analysis during vena caval occlusion for intact and SAD rabbits
y-Intercept Slope r 2

EBF-MAP
Intact  -17.54 ± 5.53 0.342 ± 0.056 0.90 ± 0.01
SAD  -0.045 ± 1.78* 0.087 ± 0.021* 0.81 ± 0.10
EVC-MAP
Intact  -15.37 ± 5.96 0.342 ± 0.062 0.81 ± 0.02
SAD 8.84 ± 2.93*  -0.003 ± 0.026* 0.64 ± 0.12
HR-MAP
Intact 797.50 ± 182.27  -6.411 ± 1.800 0.80 ± 0.03
SAD 362.27 ± 25.48*  -0.609 ± 0.153* 0.46 ± 0.07*

Values are means ± SE; n = 6 in both groups. * P < 0.01 compared with intact rabbits.


Fig. 4. Average plots by group of ear blood flow, ear vascular conductance, and heart rate vs. mean arterial pressure during ramp decreases in mean arterial pressure in intact (n = 6) and SAD (n = 6) rabbits subjected to WBH. Dashed lines, 95% confidence interval for each regression line.
[View Larger Version of this Image (25K GIF file)]


DISCUSSION

There are two major findings derived from this study. First, sinoaortic deafferentation limits the maximal cutaneous vasodilatory response to WBH in rabbits. Second, decreases in arterial blood pressure result in baroreflex-induced vasoconstriction in the hyperthermic rabbit ear. Therefore, the ear vasculature of the rabbit is on the efferent arm of the baroreflex. However, baroreflex modulation of EBF occurs via unloading of arterial baroreceptors, without major contribution from cardiopulmonary baroreceptors.

Previous reports have indicated that the degree of cutaneous vasodilation (5) and the decrease in sympathetic nerve activity to the skin (22) produced by application of thermal stimuli are similar in acute anesthetized animal preparations with and without intact baroreceptor reflexes. In contrast, results from this study demonstrate that in the chronic absence of input from arterial baroreflexes the cutaneous vasodilatory response in conscious rabbits is significantly altered. Although the threshold for vasodilation and maximal EBF attained during WBH did not differ between intact and SAD rabbits, the maximal level of EVC reached by SAD animals was significantly attenuated. Thus SAD acts to limit the cutaneous vasodilatory response during hyperthermia. To our knowledge, this is the first report of an alteration in a specific physiological response subserving thermoregulation in SAD animals. Although Kregel et al. (18) demonstrated that thermal tolerance in rats is dependent on intact arterial baroreceptor reflexes, they did not measure a specific heat loss mechanism such as cutaneous vasodilation. Despite their attenuated maximal cutaneous vasodilatory response, however, SAD rabbits did not demonstrate an increased heating rate and decreased thermal tolerance.

How does SAD limit the ability of the rabbit ear to vasodilate during heat stress? The mechanism producing this response has yet to be investigated. On the basis of the available data, however, we offer the following suggestions. First, it is unlikely that this attenuated response could be due to unloading of the remaining baroreceptor input (i.e., from cardiopulmonary baroreceptors) during heat stress, because the data contained here effectively eliminate any major contribution from cardiopulmonary baroreceptors. Additionally, there does not appear to be a possible stimulus for such a mechanism, because neither cardiac output nor HR is altered by hyperthermia in the rabbit (19), suggesting that stroke volume and venous return are also unaltered. More probably, the elimination of baroreceptor input from arterial baroreceptors acts at a central location to limit the maximal cutaneous vasodilatory response to WBH. That is, this study demonstrates that decreases in arterial baroreceptor input by SAD or by unloading of intact baroreceptors (vena caval occlusion in intact animals) result in decreases in EVC. This observation suggests that baroreceptor input somehow acts at a central integratory site to allow maximal thermoregulatory responses. When baroreceptor input decreases, cutaneous vasodilation may be limited by increasing sympathetic vasoconstrictor tone or decreasing sympathetic vasodilatory tone to ear cutaneous vascular beds (see below). Determination of the precise mechanism subserving this response remains to be investigated.

Previously, we demonstrated that the rabbit ear possesses an active neurogenic vasodilator system, as does human nonapical skin (33). We now report that the rabbit ear is also on the efferent arm of the baroreceptor reflex during hyperthermia, inasmuch as unloading of baroreceptors produces dramatic decreases in EBF and EVC in intact rabbits. This finding is similar to previous observations that indicate that the cutaneous circulation of humans subserves not only thermoregulatory but also nonthermoregulatory functions (13). Hence, the integrated response to combined thermoregulatory and nonthermoregulatory challenges in rabbits and humans is one that favors the maintenance of cardiovascular homeostasis while compromising temperature regulation. Similarly, blood flow in the rat tail is also modulated by baroreflexes during hyperthermia (25); however, the rat tail does not possess an active vasodilator system (26). Therefore, of the animal models extensively studied, the efferent control of blood flow in the rabbit ear most closely models that of the cutaneous circulation in humans, inasmuch as the rabbit ear possesses an active vasodilator system and is modulated by nonthermoregulatory reflexes originating from baroreceptors.

Alterations of EBF in response to hypotensive episodes during hyperthermia are dependent primarily on input from arterial baroreceptors. Two lines of evidence support this contention. First, pharmacological blockade of cardiopulmonary baroreceptor input via intrapericardial administration of procainamide did not decrease EVC during heat stress in intact or SAD rabbits. Theoretically, if cardiopulmonary baroreceptors were on the afferent arm of a baroreflex affecting EVC, pharmacological unloading of cardiac afferents should result in reflex vasoconstriction in the ear, especially in SAD rabbits without arterial baroreceptor input. Second, decreases in arterial blood pressure produced by vena caval occlusion failed to alter EVC in SAD rabbits. If cardiopulmonary baroreceptors were involved in triggering reflex increases in vasoconstriction, EVC would have declined to some degree as blood pressure decreased, inasmuch as input from cardiopulmonary baroreceptors is still intact in these animals. Because neither of these events occurred, one must conclude that cardiopulmonary baroreceptors do not make a major contribution to the observed modulation of EBF during heat stress.

Alternatively, it is possible that WBH per se may unload the cardiopulmonary baroreceptors to such an extent that subsequent pharmacological or mechanical unloading produces no further limitation on EVC. Although we cannot totally discount this possibility, no data are available in animals or humans to support this contention.

The finding that cardiopulmonary baroreceptor unloading fails to produce sympathetic vasoconstriction in the rabbit ear during hyperthermia contrasts markedly with the traditional view of the level of control exerted by cardiopulmonary baroreceptors on the cutaneous circulation in humans (13). In normothermic humans, small reductions in right atrial pressure (in the absence of decreases in MAP or arterial pulse pressure) result in large reductions in forearm blood flow and comparatively small reductions in splanchnic blood flow (1, 13, 15). Although forearm blood flow consists of muscle and skin components, forearm SkBF has been demonstrated to be decreased by application of mild, nonhypotensive levels of lower body negative pressure in mildly hyperthermic humans (24, 34). Hence, baroreflex control of forearm SkBF in humans has been thought to be mediated largely by cardiopulmonary baroreceptors, whereas visceral blood flow appears to be more sensitive to control by arterial baroreceptors (13). However, this view of the differential organization of vascular control in humans has recently been challenged, inasmuch as others have failed to observe cutaneous vasoconstriction in response to low levels of lower body negative pressure during hyperthermia (6, 10, 35). Which baroreceptor population acts to mediate cutaneous vasodilation in humans therefore remains controversial.

Baroreflex modulation of SkBF during heat stress could conceivably occur via 1) increases in sympathetic vasoconstrictor activity, 2) decreases in sympathetic vasodilator activity, or 3) some combination of these two effects. Recently, Kellogg and colleagues (16) attempted to determine which of these possibilities occurs in heat-stressed humans exposed to hypotensive episodes produced by lower body negative pressure. In this elegant study, these investigators iontophoresed bretylium into human skin, thereby abolishing vasoconstrictor control while leaving the active vasodilator system intact. Bretylium treatment failed to alter cutaneous vasoconstrictor responses to lower body negative pressure in hyperthermic humans, clearly demonstrating that the baroreceptor reflex exerts control over the active neurogenic vasodilator system in human skin. Presumably, such integration of the baroreflex and thermoregulatory reflexes must therefore occur within the nervous system (16). The present study does not address how baroreflex modulation of thermoregulatory SkBF occurs in the rabbit ear. Whether the mechanism involves increases in sympathetic vasoconstrictor activity or withdrawal of active vasodilator activity awaits further investigation. If it is subsequently determined that modulation of rabbit EBF by the baroreflex occurs by withdrawal of active sympathetic vasodilator activity, as it does in humans, it would be of considerable interest to investigate where this integration occurs and how it might be altered by other nonthermoregulatory reflexes. The use of the rabbit model offers the possibility of investigating such questions using more invasive methods than those available to human studies.

In conclusion, the arterial baroreceptors modulate cutaneous vasodilatory responses to heat stress in the conscious rabbit. Therefore, the vasculature of the rabbit ear is clearly on the efferent arm of the baroreflex and acts to maintain cardiovascular homeostasis during combined thermoregulatory and nonthermoregulatory challenges. Furthermore, baroreflex modulation of EVC during heat stress is mediated predominantly by the arterial baroreceptors without significant input from the cardiopulmonary baroreceptors. Further study is necessary to elucidate the efferent mechanism(s) by which the arterial baroreflex modulates heat-induced increases in EVC.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors gratefully acknowledge the superb technical support of Linda K. Stahl, E. Anne Josey, and Brenda Friesenhahn. They also thank Sue Garner for expert secretarial support.


FOOTNOTES

   This work was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grants HL-08426, HL-07350, and HL-12415.

   Present addresses: K. L. Ryan, Dept. of Biology, Trinity University, San Antonio, TX 78212; W. F. Taylor, Dept. of Thermal Stress, Naval Medical Research Institute, Bethesda, MD 20889-5055.

Address for reprint requests: V. S. Bishop, Dept. of Physiology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr., San Antonio, TX 78284-7764.

Received 13 May 1996; accepted in final form 20 August 1997.


REFERENCES

1. Abboud, F. M., D. L. Eckberg, U. J. Johannsen, and A. L. Mark. Carotid and cardiopulmonary baroreceptor control of splanchnic and forearm vascular resistance during venous pooling in man. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 286: 178-184, 1979.
2. Beiser, G. D., R. Zelis, S. E. Epstein, D. T. Mason, and E. Braunwald. The role of skin and muscle resistance vessels in reflexes mediated by the baroreceptor system. J. Clin. Invest. 49: 225-231, 1970.
3. Bond, R. F., G. F. Lackey, J. A. Taxis, and H. D. Green. Factors governing cutaneous vasoconstriction during hemorrhage. Am. J. Physiol. 219: 1210-1215, 1970.
4. Bond, R. F., E. S. Manley, Jr., and H. D. Green. Cutaneous and skeletal muscle vascular responses to hemorrhage and irreversible shock. Am. J. Physiol. 212: 488-497, 1967.
5. Conradt, M., R. Kullmann, T. Matsuzaki, and E. Simon. Arterial baroreceptor function in differential cardiovascular adjustments induced by central thermal stimulation. Basic Res. Cardiol. 70: 10-28, 1975[Medline].
6. Crandall, C. G., J. M. Johnson, W. A. Kosiba, and D. L. Kellogg, Jr. Baroreceptor control of the cutaneous active vasodilator system. J. Appl. Physiol. 81: 2192-2198, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7. Crossley, R. J., A. D. M. Greenfield, G. C. Plassaras, and D. Stephens. The interrelation of thermoregulatory and baroreceptor reflexes in the control of the blood vessels in the human forearm. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 183: 628-636, 1966[Abstract/Free Full Text].
8. DiCarlo, S. E., and V. S. Bishop. Exercise training enhances cardiac afferent inhibition of baroreflex function. Am. J. Physiol. 258 ((Heart Circ. Physiol. 27): H212-H220, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].
9. Edfeldt, H., and J. Lundvall. Sympathetic baroreflex control of vascular resistance in comfortably warm man. Analyses of neurogenic constrictor responses in the resting forearm and in its separate skeletal muscle and skin tissue compartments. Acta Physiol. Scand. 147: 437-447, 1993[Medline].
10. Escourrou, P., B. Raffestin, Y. Papelier, E. Pussard, and L. B. Rowell. Cardiopulmonary and carotid baroreflex control of splanchnic and forearm circulations. Am. J. Physiol. 264 ((Heart Circ. Physiol. 33): H777-H782, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11. Gregor, M., W. Jänig, and L. Wiprich. Cardiac and respiratory rhythmicities in cutaneous and muscle vasoconstrictor neurones to the cat's hindlimb. Pflügers Arch. 370: 299-302, 1977[Medline].
12. Jänig, W., G. Sundlöf, and B. G. Wallin. Discharge patterns of sympathetic neurons supplying skeletal muscle and skin in man and cat. J. Auton. Nerv. Syst. 7: 239-256, 1983[Medline].
13. Johnson, J. M. Nonthermoregulatory control of human skin blood flow. J. Appl. Physiol. 61: 1613-1622, 1986[Abstract/Free Full Text].
14. Johnson, J. M., M. Niederberger, L. B. Rowell, M. M. Eisman, and G. L. Brengelmann. Competition between cutaneous vasodilator and vasoconstrictor reflexes in man. J. Appl. Physiol. 35: 798-803, 1973[Free Full Text].
15. Johnson, J. M., L. B. Rowell, M. Niederberger, and M. M. Eisman. Human splanchnic and forearm vasoconstrictor responses to reductions of right atrial and aortic pressures. Circ. Res. 34: 515-524, 1974[Abstract/Free Full Text].
16. Kellogg, D. L., Jr., J. M. Johnson, and W. A. Kosiba. Baroreflex control of the cutaneous active vasodilator system in humans. Circ. Res. 66: 1420-1426, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].
17. Kendrick, E., B. Öberg, and G. Wennergren. Vasoconstrictor fibre discharge to skeletal muscle, kidney, intestine and skin at varying levels of arterial baroreceptor activity in the cat. Acta Physiol. Scand. 85: 464-476, 1972[Medline].
18. Kregel, K. C., D. G. Johnson, C. M. Tipton, and D. R. Seals. Arterial baroreceptor reflex modulation of sympathetic-cardiovascular adjustments to heat stress. Hypertension 15: 497-504, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].
19. Lublin, A., D. Wolfenson, and A. Berman. Sex differences in blood flow distribution of normothermic and heat-stressed rabbits. Am. J. Physiol. 268 ((Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 37): R66-R71, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].
20. Mancia, G., G. Grassi, A. Ferrari, and A. Zanchetti. Reflex cardiovascular regulation in humans. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 7, Suppl. 3: S152-S159, 1985.
20a. National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, 1985. [DHEW (DHHS) Publ. (NIH) 85-23]
21. Neutze, J. M., F. Wyler, and A. M. Rudolph. Changes in distribution of cardiac output after hemorrhage in rabbits. Am. J. Physiol. 215: 857-864, 1968.
22. Ninomiya, I., and S. Fujita. Reflex effects of thermal stimulation on sympathetic nerve activity to skin and kidney. Am. J. Physiol. 230: 271-278, 1976.
23. Ninomiya, I., A. Irisawa, and N. Nisimaru. Nonuniformity of sympathetic nerve activity to the skin and kidney. Am. J. Physiol. 224: 256-264, 1973.
24. Nishiyasu, T., X. Shi, G. W. Mack, and E. R. Nadel. Forearm vascular responses to baroreceptor unloading at the onset of dynamic exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 75: 979-985, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].
25. O'Leary, D. S., and J. M. Johnson. Baroreflex control of the rat tail circulation in normothermia and hyperthermia. J. Appl. Physiol. 66: 1234-1241, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].
26. O'Leary, D. S., J. M. Johnson, and W. F. Taylor. Mode of neural control mediating rat tail vasodilation during heating. J. Appl. Physiol. 59: 1533-1538, 1985[Abstract/Free Full Text].
27. Pang, C. C. Y. Effect of vasopressin antagonist and saralasin on regional blood flow following hemorrhage. Am. J. Physiol. 245 ((Heart Circ. Physiol. 14): H749-H755, 1983.
28. Rowell, L. B. Human Circulation: Regulation During Physical Stress. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.
29. Rowell, L. B., C. R. Wyss, and G. L. Brengelmann. Sustained human skin and muscle vasoconstriction with reduced baroreceptor activity. J. Appl. Physiol. 34: 639-643, 1973[Free Full Text].
30. Sapirstein, L. A., E. H. Sapirstein, and A. Bredemeyer. Effect of hemorrhage on the cardiac output and its distribution in the rat. Circ. Res. 8: 135-148, 1960[Abstract/Free Full Text].
31. Shepherd, J. T., and G. Mancia. Reflex control of the human cardiovascular system. Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 105: 1-99, 1986[Medline].
32. Takács, L., K. Kállay, and J. H. Skolnik. Effect of tourniquet shock and acute hemorrhage on the circulation of various organs in the rat. Circ. Res. 10: 753-757, 1962[Abstract/Free Full Text].
33. Taylor, W. F., S. E. DiCarlo, and V. S. Bishop. Neurogenic vasodilator control of rabbit ear blood flow. Am. J. Physiol. 262 ((Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 31): R766-R770, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].
34. Tripathi, A., and E. R. Nadel. Forearm skin and muscle vasoconstriction during lower body negative pressure. J. Appl. Physiol. 60: 1535-1541, 1986[Abstract/Free Full Text].
35. Vissing, S. F., U. Scherrer, and R. G. Victor. Increase of sympathetic discharge to skeletal muscle but not to skin during mild lower body negative pressure in humans. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 481: 233-241, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].
36. Wang, P., Z. F. Ba, J. Burkhardt, and I. H. Chaudry. Trauma-hemorrhage and resuscitation in the mouse: effects on cardiac output and organ blood flow. Am. J. Physiol. 264 ((Heart Circ. Physiol. 33): H1166-H1173, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].
37. Zar, J. H. Biostatistical Analysis (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984.

0161-7567/97 $5.00 Copyright © 1997 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
M. S. Smirnov and E. A. Kiyatkin
Fluctuations in central and peripheral temperatures associated with feeding behavior in rats
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2008; 295(5): R1415 - R1424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. K. Peters, T. Nishiyasu, and G. W. Mack
Reflex control of the cutaneous circulation during passive body core heating in humans
J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2000; 88(5): 1756 - 1764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ryan, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bishop, V. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ryan, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bishop, V. S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online