Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 83: 1976-1985, 1997;
8750-7587/97 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klaesner, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Roselli, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Klaesner, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Roselli, R. J.

Vol. 83, Issue 6, 1976-1985, December 1997

Optical measurement of isolated canine lung filtration coefficients at normal hematocrits

Joseph W. Klaesner1, N. Adrienne Pou2, Richard E. Parker2, Charlene Finney2, and Robert J. Roselli1

1 Department of Biomedical Engineering and 2 Center for Pulmonary Research, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Klaesner, Joseph W., N. Adrienne Pou, Richard E. Parker, Charlene Finney, and Robert J. Roselli. Optical measurement of isolated canine lung filtration coefficients at normal hematocrits. J. Appl. Physiol. 83(6): 1976-1985, 1997.---In this study, lung filtration coefficient (Kfc) values were measured in eight isolated canine lung preparations at normal hematocrit values using three methods: gravimetric, blood-corrected gravimetric, and optical. The lungs were kept in zone 3 conditions and subjected to an average venous pressure increase of 10.24 ± 0.27 (SE) cmH2O. The resulting Kfc (ml · min-1 · cmH2O-1 · 100 g dry lung wt-1) measured with the gravimetric technique was 0.420 ± 0.017, which was statistically different from the Kfc measured by the blood-corrected gravimetric method (0.273 ± 0.018) or the product of the reflection coefficient (sigma f) and Kfc measured optically (0.272 ± 0.018). The optical method involved the use of a Cellco filter cartridge to separate red blood cells from plasma, which allowed measurement of the concentration of the tracer in plasma at normal hematocrits (34 ± 1.5). The permeability-surface area product was measured using radioactive multiple indicator-dilution methods before, during, and after venous pressure elevations. Results showed that the surface area of the lung did not change significantly during the measurement of Kfc. These studies suggest that sigma fKfc can be measured optically at normal hematocrits, that this measurement is not influenced by blood volume changes that occur during the measurement, and that the optical sigma fKfc agrees with the Kfc obtained via the blood-corrected gravimetric method.

Evans blue; pulmonary vascular volume


INTRODUCTION

EACH year, approximately 150,000 people are affected by acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), with a 50% mortality rate, even with supportive therapy (31). There are many initial causes for ARDS, but eventually endothelial damage occurs, causing increased protein flux and fluid filtration. Transvascular fluid filtration is proportional to total lung mass and to the combined hydrostatic and osmotic pressure difference across the microvascular barrier. The constant of proportionality is defined as the filtration coefficient (Kfc) and is a measure of the porosity of the barrier. Two phenomena are generally responsible for an abnormally high filtration rate: an increase in the effective pressure difference across the barrier and an increase in Kfc. Lung injury is normally associated with an increase in Kfc. The measurement of Kfc would be of clinical significance in the treatment of ARDS. Until recently, the only technique available for measuring Kfc was in isolated lung preparations. Kfc can be estimated in animal preparations in which lung lymph is available, but this measurement is influenced by the unknown fraction of lung lymph collected. Obviously, neither of these methods can be extended to humans, since both are highly invasive.

Until recently, the "gold standard" for measurement of Kfc was the gravimetric method performed on an isolated lung preparation. The method entails an isolated lung that is suspended from a weight transducer and perfused with homologous blood using an extracorporeal circuit. When the preparation reaches an isogravimetric state, the pulmonary venous pressure is increased in a steplike fashion. The rapid initial weight gain during the first 1-3 min is generally attributed to vascular filling, whereas fluid filtration is attributed to the slower weight gain that follows (3, 7). The Kfc can be computed using the constant slope or extrapolation method. Harris et al. (11) showed that the extrapolation method was less accurate than the constant slope method; thus the data in this study were analyzed using the constant slope method. This method assumes the slope of the slower rate of weight gain to be linear with respect to time and to be the rate of fluid filtration. Kfc can be calculated by dividing this slope by the microvascular pressure increase and the dry lung weight (7).

Both gravimetric calculations assume that vascular blood volume (BV) increases for only 1-3 min after the venous pressure is increased, but Harris et al. (11) showed with the use of 51Cr-labeled red blood cells (RBC) that vascular volumes can increase for up to 30 min after a pressure elevation. Maron and Lane (21), with the use of indicator-dilution methods, also showed that BV can continue to increase for >1-3 min after a venous pressure increase. They found, however, that if the isolated lung was perfused for an extended period of time before a pressure elevation, the BV may not increase after the first 1-3 min, even though two of six animals showed some increase. Thus the gravimetric technique can be adversely affected by slow changes in vascular BV and, in any event, cannot be used in vivo.

A method for estimating Kfc in intact animals is the measurement of pulmonary pressures and lung lymph flow. This technique is generally used with sheep, because the caudal mediastinal lymph node drains a large percentage of the pulmonary interstitium. Kfc can be calculated by dividing the "total" lung lymph flow by an estimated transvascular pressure difference. Complications with this method include the fact that the capillary and interstitial pressures cannot be measured directly and the percentage of total lung lymph collected from a single node is unknown and can vary when pressures are changed (4). In addition, lung lymph cannulation cannot be extended to human Kfc measurement.

Oppenheimer et al. (22) introduced an optical technique for measurement of Kfc. The technique depends on measuring a change in optical tracer concentration in lung venous blood that occurs after a step change in pressure. The concentration of the optical tracer increases after a pressure elevation, because water flows across the pulmonary capillary barrier more readily than proteins or other large solutes. Thus, by determining the tracer concentration change for a given pressure step, the Kfc can be calculated. The main disadvantage of this technique is that RBC strongly absorb and scatter light at the wavelengths used to measure concentration changes of the optical tracers. Thus small hematocrit changes, caused by the Fahraeus-Lindqvist (26) effect or respiration (20), greatly complicate optical measurements in whole blood. Because of these problems, it was necessary for Oppenheimer's group to use multiple lasers with different wavelengths to penetrate the blood and correct for simultaneous changes in hematocrit and oxygen saturation (22). Using this optical system, but observing only a single wavelength to follow the hematocrit changes after a pressure step, Hancock et al. (10) found that optically measured values of Kfc were ~25% of those calculated using weight changes. They reasoned that this difference could be due to slow vascular volume changes that are misinterpreted as filtration when weight analysis is used.

Harris et al. (11) used a spectrophotometer to optically measure Kfc values for isolated canine lungs at low flows and small hematocrits. They measured changes in the concentration of albumin labeled with indocyanine green caused by a pulmonary venous pressure increase while they simultaneously corrected for fluctuations in RBC concentrations measured at 650 nm. Lung weight changes were monitored during pressure increases, and vascular volume changes were monitored using radioactively labeled RBC. Kfc values obtained via gravimetric methods were significantly larger than those obtained via the optical techniques. After correction for BV changes, however, the gravimetric Kfc values were comparable to those obtained using the optical method. Unfortunately, artifacts introduced by RBC masked the small changes in plasma protein concentrations, thus restricting the measurements to low hematocrits and low flow rates.

In our preliminary work (19) it was shown that the separation of RBC from plasma allowed for optical measurements of Kfc at physiological hematocrits and flow rates. On-line separation of plasma and RBC was attained by passing blood through a polysulfone filter cartridge before measuring the concentration of plasma albumin labeled with Evans blue (EBA). These concentration changes were then used to calculate Kfc (19). However, the optical Kfc values were not compared with simultaneous gravimetric measurements performed on the same isolated canine lung. In this study, Kfc was measured in an isolated canine lung preparation using gravimetric, blood-corrected gravimetric, and optical methods. A commercial filter cartridge was used to separate the plasma from the RBC, the filtering characteristics of which were documented previously by Klaesner et al. (18). The values from these methods were compared to determine whether optical Kfc values can be obtained at higher flow rates and physiological hematocrit levels.

A possible problem that can be associated with the gravimetric method of measuring Kfc is that elevated venous pressure could alter the perfused surface area via microvascular recruitment in the canine lung. An increase in surface area during elevated hydrostatic pressures would give an inflated Kfc value. We address this possibility by using a multiple indicator-dilution (MID) technique to measure the permeability-surface area product (PS) before, during, and after the Kfc measurement period.


METHODS

Kfc measurement theory. The basic principle employed by the optical method for calculating Kfc is that when lung venous pressure is increased, the hydrostatic pressure causes fluid to cross the microvascular barrier while large solutes in the plasma become more concentrated. This small transient concentration change can then be used in an equation derived by Harris et al. (11) to calculate the product of the reflection coefficient (sigma f) and Kfc
&sfgr;<SUB>f</SUB><IT>K</IT><SUB>fc</SUB> = <FR><NU><A><AC>Q</AC><AC>˙</AC></A><SUB>pa</SUB>&Dgr;C<SUB>pv</SUB></NU><DE>&Dgr;P<SUB>mv</SUB>C<SUB>pv</SUB>m<SUB>dlw</SUB></DE></FR> (1)
where Qpa is arterial plasma flow (ml/min), Delta Cpv is change in plasma concentration of nondiffusing tracer (mg/dl), Cpv is initial plasma concentration of nondiffusing tracer (mg/dl), mdlw is blood-free dry lung weight (g), Delta Pmv is change in microvascular pressure (cmH2O), and sigma f is reflection coefficient for the optical tracer.

In these studies, sigma f was assumed to be 1.0 for the optical tracer EBA. Parker et al. (24) measured sigma f for albumin in sheep lungs and found it to be >0.84. Isago et al. (17) measured microvascular reflection coefficient of sheep by venous occlusion and found values of ~0.82. Drake and Gabel (5) found sigma f to be between 0.72 and 1 in dog lungs. These values are consistent with model predictions of 0.87 and 0.89 for the three-pore models of Harris and Roselli (13), 0.90 for a two-pore model of Roselli et al. (30), 0.80 for a three-pore model of Blake and Staub (1), and 0.84 for the two-pore model of Roselli et al. (27). Thus the actual value of sigma f is probably <1.0, which implies a slight underestimate of optical Kfc estimated with sigma f = 1.0 in Eq. 1.

The capillary pressure was estimated using the formula developed by Garr et al. (7)
P<SUB>mv</SUB> = P<SUB>ven</SUB> + R<SUB>av</SUB> · (P<SUB>art</SUB> − P<SUB>ven</SUB>) (2)
where Pmv is capillary pressure, Pven is venous pressure, Part is arterial pressure, and Rav is the ratio of postcapillary resistance to total resistance (Rav = 0.4) (28).

A typical group of measurement tracings used to determine the rate of weight gain (Delta W/Delta t), Delta Pmv, and Delta Cpv is shown in Fig. 1. Figure 1C, the raw optical data, shows the initial baseline drift caused by filtration before the pressure elevation. The slope of the baseline drift immediately before the change in absorbance due to the increase in venous pressure is determined and subtracted from the raw data, resulting in the absorbance trace in Fig. 1D. The rapid absorbance change trails the pressure step by ~1 min because of the transfer function of the filter system (18). Ideally, Delta Cpv would be the difference between the baseline and the first plateau after the initial rapid absorbance increase, as shown by Harris et al. (11). Unfortunately, the transfer function of the filter tends to mask this plateau; thus Delta Cpv is determined by looking for the "break point," where the initial rapid change in absorbance slows (Fig. 1D). These values are then used in Eq. 1 to determine sigma fKfc and in the gravimetric equation [Kfc = (Delta W/Delta t)/Delta PmvMdlw] to determine Kfc. It is not necessary to convert the absorbance change to concentration, because Delta Cpv and Cpv are in absorbance units, and since concentration is directly proportional to absorbance units, the units cancel. Ideally, the Delta Cpv for the pressure decrease could be used for calculation of sigma fKfc, but the pressure step tends to be less ideal and the optical signal much noisier, making the calculation of Kfc difficult or impossible. The typical pressure step rise time (0 to two-thirds maximum) is ~5 s, whereas the typical pressure fall time (maximum to one-third maximum) is ~15 s. The disparity between the rise and fall times of the pressure changes is due to the ability to totally interrupt the venous blood from lungs, allowing for a rapid step increase. There is no equivalent maneuver available to allow for the pressure to fall more quickly.
Fig. 1. Traces for a typical measurement. A: pressure; B: weight change; C: raw optical absorbance; D: optical absorbance data after baseline drift correction. AU, absorbance units.
[View Larger Version of this Image (21K GIF file)]

MID theory. The MID measurements of urea PS (PSU) involved the injection of several radioactive tracers with different diffusing characteristics at the inlet of the lung and the collection of samples at the outlet of the lung. The vascular, or reference, tracers used in this study were 99Tc-RBC and 125I-albumin, and the barrier-limited diffusing marker was [14C]urea. 3HOH was the flow-limited tracer and was used to determine the extravascular water volume. Forty samples were collected downstream of the lung using a revolving collection wheel that rotated at a rate of 1 sample/s. The gamma isotope activity of each sample and injectate was measured in a Packard Auto-Gamma scintillation spectrometer (model 5921), and the beta activity was measured in a liquid scintillation counter (model LS 3150T, Beckman). The radioactive counts of the isotopes in each sample were then converted to tracer concentrations and plotted with respect to time. These tracer concentration-time profiles were then used in the equations below to calculate the PSU as described by Harris and Haselton and co-workers (12, 14). The integral extraction (Ei) for [14C]urea was computed as follows
E<SUB>i</SUB> = <FR><NU><LIM><OP>∫</OP><LL>0</LL><UL><IT>t</IT><SUB>peak</SUB></UL></LIM> (C<SUB>R</SUB> − C<SUB>D</SUB>) d<IT>t</IT></NU><DE><LIM><OP>∫</OP><LL>0</LL><UL><IT>t</IT><SUB>peak</SUB></UL></LIM> C<SUB>R</SUB> d<IT>t</IT></DE></FR> (3)
where tpeak is time of peak of reference curve, CR is concentration of reference tracer normalized to injectate concentration, and CD is concentration of diffusing tracer normalized to injectate concentration. Ei was then used in the following equation to calculate the urea extraction, PSU, neglecting the backdiffusion from the extravascular space
<IT>PS</IT> = −F<SUB>w</SUB> log<SUB>e</SUB> (1 − E<SUB>i</SUB>) (4)
where Fw is the water flow rate through lungs. Although PSU is known to be flow dependent (29), we kept flow constant in all these studies. The extravascular water volume (VW) was computed in the following way. First, the mean transit times for the labeled water and the CR were calculated as follows
<IT>t</IT> = <FR><NU><LIM><OP>∫</OP><LL>0</LL><UL>∞</UL></LIM> <IT>t</IT>C d<IT>t</IT></NU><DE><LIM><OP>∫</OP><LL>0</LL><UL>∞</UL></LIM> C d<IT>t</IT></DE></FR> (5)
and for the extravascular water volume as
V<SUB>W</SUB> = F<SUB>W</SUB>(<OVL><IT>t</IT></OVL><SUB>H<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB> − <OVL><IT>t</IT></OVL><SUB>R</SUB>) (6)
where <OVL><IT>t</IT></OVL>H2O is mean transit time for labeled water and <OVL><IT>t</IT></OVL>R is mean transit time for reference tracer.

If flow rates were altered during the experiments, the Crone-Renken PS may have changed with flow (29). Therefore, we calculated the product of the square root of the diffusivity (Dequiv) and surface area (D1/2S), which is not flow dependent (28). D1/2S was calculated using the model proposed by Haselton et al. (14, 15), which uses the mass balance of the tracer transport shown in Eq. 7 to account for backdiffusion from extravascular spaces
<FR><NU>∂C<SUB>D</SUB></NU><DE>∂<IT>t</IT></DE></FR> + <FR><NU>F<SUB>W</SUB></NU><DE>V<SUB>C</SUB></DE></FR> <FR><NU>∂C<SUB>D</SUB></NU><DE>∂<IT>x</IT>′</DE></FR> = <FR><NU><IT>D</IT><SUB>equiv</SUB><IT>S</IT></NU><DE>V<SUB>C</SUB></DE></FR> <FENCE><FR><NU>∂C<SUB>DI</SUB></NU><DE>∂<IT>z</IT>′</DE></FR> </FENCE><IT>z</IT>′ = 0 (7)
<FR><NU>∂C<SUB>DI</SUB></NU><DE>∂<IT>t</IT></DE></FR> = <FR><NU><IT>D</IT><SUB>equiv</SUB></NU><DE><IT>L</IT><SUP>2</SUP><SUB>e</SUB></DE></FR> <FR><NU>∂<SUP>2</SUP>C<SUB>DI</SUB></NU><DE>∂′<SUB><IT>z</IT></SUB><SUP>2</SUP></DE></FR> (8)
with boundary conditions
C<SUB>D</SUB>(0, <IT>x</IT>′) = C<SUB>DI</SUB>(0, <IT>x</IT>′, <IT>z</IT>′) = 0 (9)
C<SUB>DI</SUB>(<IT>t</IT>, <IT>x</IT>′, ∞) = 0 (10)
C<SUB>D</SUB>(<IT>t</IT>, 0) = C<SUB>R</SUB> <FENCE><IT>t</IT> − <FR><NU>V<SUB>C</SUB></NU><DE>F<SUB>W</SUB></DE></FR>, <IT>z</IT>′ = 1</FENCE> (11)
where VC is intracapillary blood volume, Le is extravascular diffusion distance, which is assumed to be large, x' is normalized dimension perpendicular to flow, z' is normalized dimension parallel to flow, CDI is tracer concentration in extravascular space, and Dequiv is diffusivity described by the following equation
<FR><NU>1</NU><DE><IT>D</IT><SUB>equiv</SUB></DE></FR> = <FR><NU>1</NU><DE><IT>D</IT><SUB>e</SUB></DE></FR> + <FR><NU>3</NU><DE><IT>L</IT><SUB>e</SUB><IT>P</IT></DE></FR> (12)
where De is diffusivity of tracer in extravascular space and P is capillary permeability. Le was assumed to be large in these studies, so that only a single parameter D1/2S is fitted by the model (15).

Protocol. The system shown in Fig. 2 was used to make the optical and gravimetric measurements of Kfc. The filter fibers (model 4007-10, Cellco, Germantown, MD) were prepared for blood contact by infusion of 5,000 U of heparin in normal saline. These filter cartridges were different from the experimental cartridges used in our previous study (19) but have been characterized by Klaesner et al. (18) and are commercially available from Cellco. The lung perfusion pump (Masterflex peristaltic pump) circulated 1,000-1,200 ml/min through the lungs, with the flow rate measured by an electromagnetic flow probe (Carolina Biological Supply). A second pump (model 7523-20, Cole Parmer) pulled 200-300 ml/min of the lung perfusate from the venous outflow through the filter cartridge. The resistor on the outflow of the filter was adjusted until an adequate filtrate flow rate that did not cause significant hemolysis or bubble formation was achieved, normally ~15 ml/min, with a transmembrane pressure of ~150 cmH2O. Hydraulic capacitors, constructed from partially air-filled disposable syringes, were used to dampen oscillations caused by the pumps. The RBC and filtrate were returned to the main reservoir. The perfusate temperature was maintained between 37 and 39°C by pumping warm water through the jacketed beaker used as the main reservoir.
Fig. 2. Isolated canine lung perfusion system. EB, Evans blue.
[View Larger Version of this Image (25K GIF file)]

The experimental protocol for the canine preparation was outlined by Harris et al. (11). Briefly, a large (>50-pound) mongrel dog, screened for microfilaria, was anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (30 mg/kg) and maintained with halothane. A catheter was inserted into the femoral artery through which heparin was injected (600 U/kg) and allowed to circulate for 15 min to prevent clotting. The dog was then exsanguinated, and the blood was saved for the study. A thoracotomy was performed through the fifth intercostal space, the main pulmonary artery was ligated, and the heart and lungs were removed. The lower portion of the heart was removed to allow the left atrium and the main pulmonary artery to be cannulated. The lungs were then connected to the ventilation-perfusion system shown in Fig. 1, with care to ensure that air is not allowed into the vessels, and placed into the humidified chamber. The lungs were ventilated with 95% O2-5% CO2 that was kept at a constant pressure of 2 cmH2O by adjustment of the resistance of the air outflow. The lungs were held in zone 3 by setting venous pressure >3 cmH2O relative to the top of the lung.

NaI detectors were positioned over the suspended lung and the perfusate to monitor radioactivity. Baseline radioactivity was monitored for 5 min at a rate of 2 samples/min before addition of any isotopes to the perfusate to obtain baseline radioactivity. RBC were radiolabeled with 20-30 µCi of 51Cr and injected into the reservoir. The labeled RBC were distributed throughout the lung by raising and lowering venous pressure several times. The increase in radioactivity due to the 51Cr-RBC was converted to pulmonary blood weight increase and subtracted from the rate of lung weight gain to correct the gravimetrically calculated Kfc (11).

EBA was prepared by centrifuging enough blood (normally 100-120 ml) to obtain 65 ml of plasma and adding 13 mg of Evans blue to the resultant supernatant. This was mixed on a rocker for ~10 min to enable the Evans blue to form a tight covalent bond with the albumin (19). About 20 ml of plasma and 5 ml of EBA were set aside to make calibration standards. Once the lung perfusion and filtrate sampling systems were operating properly, the remaining 60 ml of EBA were added to the reservoir. This provided a step increase that approached a baseline plasma absorbance of ~0.2 absorbance unit.

Once the optical signal was stable, the lungs were subjected to several pressure elevations. An experimental run consisted of elevating lung venous pressure by 8-15 cmH2O for 10-12 min, then lowering venous pressure back to the original value. The pressure was elevated by clamping both tubes at the resistor "Y" (Fig. 1), with the clamp on the resistor arm released when the pressure reached the appropriate level. The resistor was adjusted until the desired venous pressure was attained. Both tubes were initially clamped so that a more ideal pressure step was achieved. Samples from the reservoir and the filtrate were drawn before each pressure elevation. These samples were used to determine the initial concentration of EBA before each run. The optical responses were observed using the spectrophotometer (model 1706 UV/Vis monitor, Bio-Rad), and the pressure changes (model 1290A, Hewlett-Packard) were recorded at 1 Hz using a Kiethley-Metrabyte DAS-20 analog-to digital card. Kfc was then calculated using Eq. 2 (11).

The PSU of the isolated lungs was measured using the technique outlined in MID theory. The PSU was measured before, during, and after the third venous pressure increase (Fig. 3). Thus any changes in PSU due to increases in hydrostatic pressures could be tracked.
Fig. 3. Multiple indicator-dilution curves made at times indicated by arrows. Pmv, microvascular pressure.
[View Larger Version of this Image (13K GIF file)]

When the experiment was completed, the lungs were weighed, homogenized, dried in a microwave oven at low power, and reweighed. Samples from the lung were counted in the Packard Auto-Gamma scintillation spectrometer to use the 51Cr-RBC to determine the blood-free dry lung weight (BFDLW) so that the PSU values of different-sized lungs could be compared by a standardized method (2, 25). Also a set of EBA concentration standards was prepared. Preparation involved serially diluting 5 ml of EBA stock with plasma. These standards were passed directly through the spectrophotometer, creating an absorbance-to-concentration conversion relation. The samples taken during the experiment were also passed directly through the spectrophotometer, and the absorbances of the samples were converted to concentrations of EBA. The concentrations were used in Eq. 2 to calculate the Kfc for each run.


RESULTS

Eight isolated canine lung preparations were used in this study. Each lung was subjected to 5-10 venous pressure increases, with the optical, gravimetric, and RBC-corrected gravimetric Kfc values measured for each run (Table 1). The constant slope technique was used to calculate the Kfc values for the gravimetric techniques (7). Using two-way analysis of variance with the Student-Newman-Keuls test for multiple comparisons, it was shown that the optically measured sigma fKfc (0.268 ± 0.018 ml · min-1 · cmH2O-1 · 100 g dry lung wt-1) was not statistically different from the gravimetric Kfc corrected for blood volume changes (0.256 ± 0.018 ml · min-1 · cmH2O-1 · 100 g dry lung wt-1). Both values, however, were statistically different from the Kfc measured gravimetrically (0.420 ± 0.017 ml · min-1 · cmH2O-1 · 100 g dry lung wt-1). The average pressure step was 10.24 ± 0.27 cmH2O, and the average hematocrit of the blood was 34 ± 1.5. 

Table  1.   Kfc and compliance values
Dog No. No. of Runs Compliance g · cmH2O-1 · 100 g DLW-1 Gravimetric Kfc Blood-Corrected Gravimetric Kfc Optical sigma f Kfc Pressure Step, cmH2O Hematocrit

FB1 10 16.7 ± 2.1 0.24 ± 0.04 0.18 ± 0.04 0.12 ± .04 8.98 35
FB2 6 17.9 ± 5.3 0.36 ± 0.05 0.15 ± 0.07 0.10 ± 0.05 12.5 34
FB3 7 16.6 ± 3.7 0.45 ± 0.05 0.35 ± 0.05 0.45 ± 0.06 10.17 33
FB4 9 12.8 ± 1.9 0.43 ± 0.04 0.23 ± 0.04 0.35 ± 0.05 11.45 33
FB5 10 13.1 ± 1.9 0.35 ± 0.04 0.18 ± 0.04 0.22 ± 0.04 11.13 36
FB6 6 11.9 ± 1.6 0.28 ± 0.05 0.12 ± 0.05 0.25 ± 0.05 8.38 27
FB7 5 12.9 ± 4.0 0.53 ± 0.05 0.26 ± 0.07 0.21 ± 0.07 8.83 33
FB8 10 14.7 ± 1.6 0.73 ± 0.04 0.59 ± 0.04 0.45 ± 0.04 10.14 42
Avg 8 14.6 ± 3.3 0.42 ± 0.02 0.26 ± 0.02 0.27 ± 0.02 10.24 ± 0.27 34 ± 4

Values are means ± SE. Filtration coefficient (Kfc) values are expressed as ml · min-1 · cmH2O-1 · 100 g blood-free dry lung wt-1. sigma f, reflection coefficient; DLW, dry lung wt.

The compliances for all the pressure elevations were calculated by dividing the initial weight change by the pressure step and the blood-free dry weight and are shown in Table 1. The compliance values and the compliance values normalized by the first value were plotted against the measurement run for all the studies in Fig. 4 to determine whether there were any changes in compliance with respect to time. The results in Fig. 4 suggest that vascular compliance decreased slightly during the experiment, probably because of increased fluids in the interstitium. All the Kfc values and the Kfc values normalized by the first measured value were plotted against experimental runs for the blood-corrected gravimetric data in Fig. 5 and the optical data in Fig. 6. The Kfc values tend to increase with time, probably because of breakdown in the endothelial barrier. Figure 7 shows how the compliance and Kfc values changed during the course of a single isolated lung study (dog FB8).


Fig. 4. A: compliance values plotted against experimental runs. B: normalized compliance values plotted against experimental runs. DLW, dry lung weight.
[View Larger Version of this Image (16K GIF file)]


Fig. 5. A: blood-corrected gravimetric filtration coefficient (Kfc) values plotted against experimental runs. B: normalized blood-corrected gravimetric Kfc values plotted against experimental runs.
[View Larger Version of this Image (19K GIF file)]


Fig. 6. A: optical Kfc values plotted against experimental runs. B: normalized optical Kfc values plotted against experimental runs.
[View Larger Version of this Image (17K GIF file)]


Fig. 7. Optical and blood-corrected gravimetric Kfc and compliance values plotted against experimental run for a single isolated lung study (dog FB8).
[View Larger Version of this Image (24K GIF file)]

The average PSU values measured for the eight dogs are summarized in Table 2 and shown in Fig. 8. Figure 8 shows that most of the variance in PSU values is between dogs, rather than between PSU values measured at different pressures. The average PSU measured during elevated pressures (4.97 ± 2.23 ml/s) was slightly higher than the average values measured at baseline and postfiltration lung venous pressures (4.66 ± 2.07 and 4.75 ± 1.97 ml/s), but the difference was not statistically significant. The average PSU values normalized by BFDLW are 0.096 ± 0.035, 0.1024 ± 0.038, and 0.098 ± 0.33 ml · s-1 · g-1 and are listed in Table 3. The D1/2S values are listed in Table 4. These values were plotted against the PSU values in Fig. 9. Because the flow did not change between the runs, there is a linear relationship between the two measurements with an R2 of 0.737. The Kfc values for all three measurement methods are plotted against PSU/BFDLW in Figs. 10, 11, 12.

Table  2.   PSU and pressure difference values
Dog No. PSu, ml/s
Pmv - Palv, cmH2O
Baseline Elevated After Baseline Elevated After

FB1 1.05 1.14 0.94 8.86 14.28 8.01
FB2 3.93 4.05 4.27 9.16 19.85 8.62
FB3 3.76 4.16 3.73 8.75 21.52 8.73
FB4 6.26 6.17 6.33 11.39 20.91 11.85
FB5 6.03 6.76 5.52 11.17 22.49 11.06
FB6 5.66 5.51 5.92 5.66 14.95 5.37
FB7 7.93 8.87 7.77 5.4 15.65 6.42
FB8 2.69 3.13 3.5 5.71 16.6 6.03
Avg 4.66 ± 2.07 4.97 ± 2.23 4.75 ± 1.97 8.26 ± 2.42 18.28 ± 3.26 8.26 ± 2.33

Average values are means ± SE. PSu, urea permeability - surface area product; Pmv, microvascular pressure; Palv, alveolar pressure.


Fig. 8. Permeability-surface area product (PS) for urea for 8 dogs (FB1-FB8) before venous pressure increase (filled bars), during venous pressure increase (open bars), and after venous pressure increase (hatched bars).
[View Larger Version of this Image (27K GIF file)]

Table  3.   PSU values corrected for BFDLW
Dog No. PSu/BFDLW, ml · s-1 · g-1
Before Elevated After

FB1 0.027 0.029 0.024
FB2 0.073 0.075 0.079
FB3 0.117 0.129 0.116
FB4 0.133 0.131 0.135
FB5 0.123 0.137 0.112
FB6 0.087 0.085 0.091
FB7 0.131 0.147 0.129
FB8 0.073 0.085 0.095
Avg 0.096 ± 0.037 0.102 ± 0.041 0.098 ± 0.035

Average values are means ± SE. BFDLW, blood-free dry lung wt.

Table  4.   D1/2S values
Dog No. D1/2S, ml/s1/2
Before During After

FB1 1.96 2.36 2.78
FB2 7.91 10.05 8.17
FB3 7.31 8.23 6.67
FB4 10.01 12.57 13.66
FB5 11.85 15.24 11.16
FB6 15.47 16.68 15.31
FB7 13.06 14.51 12.68
Avg 9.65 ± 4.44  11.38 ± 4.95 10.06 ± 4.41

Average values are means ± SE. D1/2S, product of square root of diffusivity and surface area.


Fig. 9. Product of square root of diffusivity and surface area (D1/2S) vs. PS for urea (PSU) shows linear relationship between 2 models for calculation of permeability. Slope = 2.01; R2 = 0.737.
[View Larger Version of this Image (9K GIF file)]


Fig. 10. Kfc vs. PSU corrected for blood-free dry lung weight (PSU/BFDLW) for gravimetric data. Heavy line, regression without 2 high Kfc values.
[View Larger Version of this Image (20K GIF file)]


Fig. 11. Kfc vs. PSU/BFDLW for blood-corrected gravimetric data. Heavy line, regression without 2 high Kfc values.
[View Larger Version of this Image (19K GIF file)]


Fig. 12. Reflection coefficient-Kfc product (sigma fKfc) vs. PSU/BFDLW for optical data. Heavy line, regression without 2 high Kfc values.
[View Larger Version of this Image (18K GIF file)]

There appears to be a linear relationship between the Kfc values and the PSU/BFDLW. Table 5 summarizes the slopes of the lines in Figs. 10, 11, 12. Two values of Kfc did not seem to group with the others, so the regression was performed on the other six values. The R2 values improved substantially without the two outlying values.

Table  5.   Slope and R 2 as determined by linear regression
Gravimetric Values Blood-Corrected Gravimetric Values Optical Values

8 Kfc values
Slope 2.23 1.32 2.17
R 2 0.25 0.08 0.35
6 Kfc values
Slope 2.18 1.37 2
R 2 0.74 0.78 0.53

Slope is expressed as 1 · 6,000-1 · cmH2O-1. Values were determined using all 8 Kfc values and without 2 high Kfc values.

Table 6 summarizes the extravascular water content determined via MID data, as well as by postmortem methods. As expected, the extravascular water was considerably higher at the end of pressure elevations, indicating that water was forced into the interstitium or alveoli. Postmortem extravascular water content was significantly more than that found using MID techniques, because MID measures perfused extravascular water. Thus much of the water in the extravascular spaces was present in the alveolar sacs or in areas of the lung that were not perfused.

Table  6.   Extravascular water content of lung measured using MID and postmortem data
Dog No. Flow, ml/min Extravascular Water, ml
Baseline Elevated After Postmortem

FB1 836 41.05 73.36 41.49 151.5
FB2 835 155.43 203.71 122.17 337.45
FB3 990 90.7 151 114.24 164.68
FB4 1,040 108.5 152.45 118.06 329.36
FB5 1,314 162.33 163.57 178.1 249.67
FB6 936 178.55 253.63 109.76 280.17
FB7 1,140 147.46 194.03 134.62 297.24
FB8 1,022 173.2 216.26 191.08 285.25
Avg 1014 ± 149 132.15 ± 44.85 176 ± 50.76 126.19 ± 42.79 261.92 ± 65.36

Average values are means ± SE. MID, multiple indicator-dilution.


DISCUSSION

Our Kfc values were compared with those obtained by other investigators using the constant slope method of analysis for the gravimetric technique and the optical technique. They tended to agree with measurements by other investigators, which are summarized in Table 7 (6-9, 16, 22, 23). The Kfc found optically by Harris et al. (11) was based on a sigma f of 0.5, whereas our values are based on a sigma f of 1.0. Thus our values were about twice as large as those found by Harris et al. This can probably be attributed to the fact that Harris et al. perfused isolated lungs with a very-low-hematocrit perfusate (~1-10%).

Table  7.   Comparison of Kfc values on the basis of 100 g DLW
Kfc Ref.

Gravimetric
0.31 6
0.22 7
0.15 16
0.22 8
0.22 9
0.52 11
0.42 Present study
Optical
4.5 23
0.86 (fast phase) 22
0.27 (slow phase) 22
0.28 11
0.27 Present study

Kfc is expressed as ml · min-1 · cmH2O-1 · 100 g DLW-1.

The present studies show that the optical method of measuring Kfc provides values that are very comparable to those obtained by the gravimetric method once corrected for vascular volume increases. BV weight gain accounted for ~36% of the gravimetric Kfc. The MID studies indicate that PSU does not increase during pressure elevations, and since permeability is not expected to change, surface area appears to remain constant during a Kfc measurement. Thus vascular volume increases are probably due to vascular relaxation, rather than capillary recruitment. One might expect some correlation between this vascular relaxation and compliance, but Fig. 13 shows no obvious relationship between lung compliance and the percentage of weight gain of the lung due to blood volume increases during the elevated venous pressure.


Fig. 13. Compliance vs. percent weight gain due to blood volume increases.
[View Larger Version of this Image (15K GIF file)]

Data displayed in Figs. 10, 11, 12 suggest a correlation between Kfc and PSU/BFDLW. The regression slope for the gravimetric values of Kfc was greater than the regression slopes for the blood-corrected gravimetric or optical Kfc. This could be expected because the average gravimetric Kfc value was greater than the values found with the other two methods.

Data from dogs FB3 and FB6 seem to contradict the general finding that the optical Kfc compares favorably with the blood-corrected gravimetric Kfc. However, a closer look at the data from one or two experimental runs for these two studies skewed the average value obtained for the entire dog. In dog FB3, no optical data were collected for the last two experimental runs because of electronic difficulties. The average Kfc measured for dog FB3 when the last two experimental runs are neglected for the gravimetric, blood-corrected gravimetric, and optical methods are 0.526, 0.424, and 0.447 ml · min-1 · cmH2O-1 · 100 g dry lung wt-1, respectively. Values for dog FB6 were somewhat skewed by the first experimental run, which included a very small gravimetric value of 0.05 ml · min-1 · cmH2O-1 · 100 g dry lung wt-1. If the first experimental run is neglected, the gravimetric, blood-corrected gravimetric, and optical Kfc values are 0.322, 0.145, and 0.228 ml · min-1 · cmH2O-1 · 100 g dry lung wt-1, respectively. These values for Kfc for dogs FB3 and FB6 are more in line with the general findings that the optical and blood-corrected gravimetric techniques give values that agree with each other and are less than those obtained using the traditional gravimetric technique.

In conclusion, we believe that the optical method for measuring Kfc provides an accurate measurement of Kfc in isolated canine lung preparations. A practical advantage of this method is that it is independent of lung blood volume changes and thus does not require a separate measurement of vascular volume changes. The results were very comparable to those found by gravimetric techniques after correction for BV increases. By separating RBC from plasma with polysulfone filter fibers, optical concentration measurements can be made in plasma, without the optical artifacts associated with RBC. This allows measurements to be made in blood with physiological hematocrits and normal flow rates. Also, we have shown that the measurement technique of elevating venous pressures does not alter the PSU of the lung significantly, thus showing that lung microvascular surface area does not change during a measurement when the lung is kept in zone 3. A final advantage of the optical technique is that it is not restricted to an isolated lung preparation. The method has been extended to an intact animal preparation, and preliminary experiments are encouraging (19).


FOOTNOTES

Address for reprint requests: J. W. Klaesner, Dept. of Anesthesiology, Saint Louis University Medical School, 1402 S. Grand Ave., St. Louis, MO 63104.

Received 25 September 1996; accepted in final form 14 August 1997.


REFERENCES

1. Blake, L. H., and N. C. Staub. Pulmonary vascular transport in sheep. A mathematical model. Microvasc. Res. 12: 197-220, 1976[Medline].
2. Collins, J. C., J. H. Newman, N. E. Wickersham, W. K. Vaughn, J. R. Snapper, T. R. Harris, and K. L. Brigham. Relation of blood-free to blood-inclusive postmortem lung water measurements in sheep. J. Appl. Physiol. 59: 592-596, 1985[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3. Drake, R., K. A. Gaar, and A. E. Taylor. Estimation of the filtration coefficient of pulmonary exchange vessels. Am. J. Physiol. 234 ((Heart Circ. Physiol. 3): H266-H274, 1978[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4. Drake, R., M. Giesler, G. Laine, J. Gabel, and T. Hansen. Effect of outflow pressure on lung lymph flow in unanesthetized sheep. J. Appl. Physiol. 58: 70-76, 1985[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5. Drake, R. E., and J. C. Gabel. Estimation of the pulmonary microvascular reflection coefficient to protein in dogs. J. Appl. Physiol. 71: 94-98, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].
6. Ehrhart, I. C., W. M. Granger, and W. F. Hofman. Filtration coefficient obtained by stepwise pressure elevation in isolated dog lung. J. Appl. Physiol. 56: 862-867, 1984[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7. Gaar, K. A., Jr., A. E. Taylor, L. J. Owens, and A. C. Guyton. Pulmonary capillary pressure and filtration coefficient in the isolated perfused lung. Am. J. Physiol. 213: 910-914, 1967.
8. Hall, J. E., W. F. Hofman, and I. C. Ehrhart. Venous occlusion pressure and vascular permeability in the dog lung after air embolization. J. Appl. Physiol. 65: 34-40, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].
9. Hancock, B. J., M. Hoppensack, and L. Oppenheimer. Do transvascular forces in isolated lobe preparations equilibrate? J. Appl. Physiol. 67: 628-635, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10. Hancock, B. J., K. P. Landolfo, M. Hoppensack, and L. Oppenheimer. Slow phase of transvascular fluid flux reviewed. J. Appl. Physiol. 69: 456-464, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11. Harris, N. R., R. E. Parker, N. A. Pou, and R. J. Roselli. Canine pulmonary filtration coefficient calculated from optical, radioisotope, and weight measurements. J. Appl. Physiol. 73: 2648-2661, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].
12. Harris, T. R., and K. L. Brigham. The exchange of small molecules as a measure of normal and abnormal lung microvascular function. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 384: 417-434, 1982[Abstract].
13. Harris, T. R., and R. J. Roselli. A theoretical model of protein, fluid, and small molecule transport in the lung. J. Appl. Physiol. 50: 1-14, 1981[Abstract/Free Full Text].
14. Haselton, F. R., R. E. Parker, R. J. Roselli, and T. R. Harris. Analysis of lung multiple indicator data with an effective diffusivity model of capillary exchange. J. Appl. Physiol. 57: 98-109, 1984[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15. Haselton, F. R., R. J. Roselli, and T. R. Harris. An effective-diffusivity model of pulmonary capillary exchange: general theory, limiting cases, and sensitivity. Math. Biosci. 70: 237-263, 1984.
16. Hofman, W. F., and I. C. Ehrhart. Vascular reactivity and permeability to serotonin in cyclooxygenase-inhibited dog lung. Am. J. Physiol. 255 ((Heart Circ. Physiol. 24): H1096-H1105, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].
17. Isago, T., L. D. Traber, D. N. Herndon, S. Abdi, K. Fujioka, and D. L. Traber. Determination of pulmonary microvascular reflection coefficient in sheep by venous occlusion. J. Appl. Physiol. 69: 2311-2316, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18. Klaesner, J. W., N. A. Pou, R. L. Galloway, and R. J. Roselli. Laser system for measuring small changes in plasma tracer concentration. Biomed. Instrum. Technol. 30: 507-516, 1996[Medline].
19. Klaesner, J. W., R. J. Roselli, S. Evans, N. A. Pou, R. E. Parker, G. Tack, and M. Parham. Optical measurements of lung microvascular filtration coefficient using polysulfone fibers. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 22: 660-673, 1994[Medline].
20. Lee, J. S., and L. P. Lee. Effect of hemodilution on ventilatory fluctuations of pulmonary capillary blood volume. J. Appl. Physiol. 65: 2571-2578, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].
21. Maron, M. B., and S. M. Lane. Time course of blood volume changes in an isolated lung lobe after venous pressure elevation. J. Appl. Physiol. 77: 2720-2726, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].
22. Oppenheimer, L., W. N. Richardson, D. Bilan, and M. Hoppensack. Colorimetric device for measurement of transvascular fluid flux in blood-perfused organs. J. Appl. Physiol. 62: 364-372, 1987[Abstract/Free Full Text].
23. Oppenheimer, L., H. W. Unruh, C. Skoog, and H. S. Goldberg. Transvascular fluid flux measured from intravascular water concentration changes. J. Appl. Physiol. 54: 64-72, 1983[Abstract/Free Full Text].
24. Parker, R. E., R. J. Roselli, and K. L. Brigham. Effects of prolonged elevated microvascular pressure on lung fluid balance in sheep. J. Appl. Physiol. 58: 869-875, 1985[Abstract/Free Full Text].
25. Peterson, B. T., J. A. Brooks, and A. G. Zack. Use of microwave oven for determination of postmortem water volume of lungs. J. Appl. Physiol. 52: 1661-1663, 1982[Abstract/Free Full Text].
26. Richardson, W. N., D. Bilan, M. Hoppensack, and L. Oppenheimer. Fast-phase transvascular fluid flux and the Fahraeus effect. J. Appl. Physiol. 62: 1513-1520, 1987[Abstract/Free Full Text].
27. Roselli, R. J., S. R. Coy, and T. R. Harris. Models of lung transvascular fluid and protein transport. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 15: 127-138, 1987[Medline].
28. Roselli, R. J., and T. R. Harris. Lung fluid and macromolecular transport. In: Respiratory Physiology: An Analytical Approach, edited by H. K. Chang, and M. Paiva. New York: Dekker, 1989, p. p.633-735. (Lung Biol. Health Dis. Ser.)
29. Roselli, R. J., T. R. Harris, and N. A. Pou. Effects of perfusion on urea extraction in zone 3 sheep lungs (Abstract). Ann. Biomed. Eng. 23: S13, 1987.
30. Roselli, R. J., R. E. Parker, and T. R. Harris. Comparison between pore model predictions and sheep lung fluid and protein transport. Microvasc. Res. 29: 320-339, 1985[Medline].
31. Thomas, C. L. Taber's Cyclopedic Medical Dictionary. Philadelphia, PA: Davis, 1993.

0161-7567/97 $5.00 Copyright © 1997 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. B. Pearse, P. M. Becker, and S. Permutt
Effect of changing vascular volume on measurement of protein reflection coefficient in ischemic lungs
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2001; 280(2): H918 - H924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. W. Klaesner, N. A. Pou, R. E. Parker, C. Finney, and R. J. Roselli
Optical measurement of isolated canine lung filtration coefficients after alloxan infusion
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 1998; 84(4): 1381 - 1387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a frien