|
|
||||||||
Vol. 83, Issue 5, 1607-1611, 1997
Systems Neurobiology Laboratory, Departments of Physiological Science and Neurobiology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-1527
Mellen, Nicholas M., and Jack L. Feldman.
Vagal stimulation induces expiratory lengthening in the in vitro
neonate rat. J. Appl. Physiol. 83(5):
1607-1611, 1997.
Respiration is modulated by lung mechanoreceptor
feedback in vivo on a cycle-to-cycle basis. We replicated this
modulation in vitro and tested four stimulus protocols to identify
which of these most closely replicated in vivo responses to lung
mechanoreceptor activation in mammals. We activated pulmonary vagal
afferent pathways by electrical stimulation or by lung inflation,
applied during expiration, which produces expiratory lengthening in
vivo. In each modality, transient and tonic stimuli were applied.
Stimuli were applied over a range of delays following inspiratory
termination. Tonic stimuli were maintained until subsequent inspiratory
onset. All stimulus modalities prolonged expiration
(P < 0.05). These results indicate
that the neural circuitry mediating pulmonary afferent modulation of
expiratory duration is retained in vitro.
pulmonary afferents; lung; vagus; medulla
IN INTACT MAMMALS, ventilation results from a centrally
generated rhythm processed through premotor circuits and modulated by
afferent feedback. Although the effects of pulmonary afferent feedback
are well characterized in vivo, their cellular basis is difficult to
study because of interaction between various afferent inputs and the
difficulty in accessing and manipulating relevant neuronal populations.
By extending experimental protocols from in vivo to in vitro, novel
investigation of the cellular and synaptic basis for respiratory rhythm
generation is made possible (7, 12). We sought to extend
the in vitro approach to understanding pulmonary afferent modulation of
respiratory pattern by reproducing in vivo pulmonary reflexes in vitro.
To do this, we used a lung-attached neonate rat brain stem/spinal cord
preparation developed by Murakoshi and Otsuka (10).
The effect of lung inflation on respiratory pattern varies with
respiratory phase in vivo (Hering-Breuer reflex; see Refs. 5, 6): lung inflation during inspiration terminates inspiratory activity, early in expiration lengthens expiration, and late in expiration has no effect on expiratory duration. Similar effects are
produced by moderate electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve (1, 4,
6).
The Hering-Breuer reflex is mediated by slowly adapting pulmonary
mechanoreceptors (SARs). SARs are inflation sensitive, respond briskly
to changes in lung pressure, and fire tonically in relation to lung
volume (1). SARs are part of the vagus (X) nerve projecting to the
medial nucleus tractus solitarii (3).
In an in vitro neonate rat brain stem/spinal cord with lungs attached,
inspiratory activity is delayed when lungs are inflated during
expiration (10). In these experiments, pressure changes outside of the
physiological range (20 cmH2O)
were used to inflate the lungs. We used a similar preparation, but with
pressure changes in the physiological range (3-8
cmH2O) (9). We compared changes in
expiratory duration resulting from lung inflation with changes in
expiratory duration resulting from electrical stimulation of the vagus
nerve. We also compared stimuli with a tonic component to transient
stimuli. In this study, we did not investigate responses to lung
inflation during inspiration.
We found that sustained lung inflation within the physiological range
and electrical stimulation reliably gave rise to expiratory lengthening. Transient lung inflation was least effective in changing expiratory duration. Our results suggest that the neural substrate mediating the Hering-Breuer reflex in vivo is retained in the in vitro
preparation. Some of the results have been published in abstract form
(8).
Dissection. Six Sprague-Dawley rats
(newborn to 4 days old) were used. The basic dissection methods are
described elsewhere (11). The preparation was modified so as to retain
lungs, heart, and trachea, connected to the brain stem by the right
vagus nerve (Fig.
1A).
The left vagus nerve was transected close to the point of entry into
the lung and used for electrical stimulation.
The C1 ventral root was drawn into
a glass suction electrode for recording, and the left vagus nerve was
drawn into another suction electrode for stimulation. A cannula
(22-gauge) was inserted into the trachea, held in place with a suture,
and connected to a computer-controlled precision syringe pump (Carnegie
Medecin M100) for controlled lung inflation. Lungs and cannula were
filled with saline (27°C). Pressure changes were monitored by
measuring changes in the height of a column of saline connected to a
branch off the syringe pump.
Experimental protocol. To investigate
the phase dependence of the response to SAR stimulation, stimuli were
applied at various delays relative to inspiratory onset (Fig.
1B). Response to a stimulus was
measured as a change in period, defined as the interval between
consecutive inspiratory bursts (Fig.
2A).
We used two stimulus modalities: lung inflation or electrical
stimulation of the cut vagus. Stimulus protocol parameters were 1) delay following inspiratory
onset, 2) number of control cycles between stimuli, and 3) stimulus
magnitude (pressure or current).
Constant-current electrical stimuli (1-15 µA) ranged in
amplitude between 4 and 8 mV. We measured the volume of fluid injected into the lungs as well as the resultant pressure change. Volumes injected ranged between 0.4 and 0.8 ml, which corresponded to a
pressure change of 3.0-8.0
cmH2O and produced uniform
inflation of lungs. In both modalities, stimulus amplitude was the
minimum at which lengthening was obtained in comparison to control
periods, when applied at midexpiration.
Transient stimuli were compared with stimuli with a tonic component. In
the lung inflation protocol, transient stimuli were obtained by lung
inflation immediately followed by deflation to resting volume
(Inflate/Deflate); stimuli with a tonic component were
obtained by inflating the lung and holding it inflated until the
subsequent inspiratory burst (Inflate/Hold). In the electrical stimulation protocol, transient stimuli were obtained by applying a
brief, high-frequency electrical stimulus (Burst; 8-12 pulses, 5-ms duration, 100 Hz); stimuli with a tonic component were obtained by
a brief, high-frequency train followed by a sustained low-frequency train, terminating at the subsequent inspiratory burst (Burst/Tonic; high-frequency train: 8-12 pulses, 5-ms duration, 100 Hz;
low-frequency train: 5-ms pulses at 33 Hz). Stimulus protocols are
summarized in Fig. 1B.
We use the term "bout" to denote the repeated application of a
given stimulus type over a range of delays. Each experiment consisted
of multiple bouts. In each bout, stimuli were applied at fixed delays
after inspiratory onset. At least five control cycles separated cycles
with stimulus application. Between bouts the preparation was left
undisturbed for at least 20 cycles. Up to seven bouts occurred per
experiment. The order of stimulus types in consecutive bouts was
random.
Stimulus delays spanned as much of the expiratory phase as possible,
based on an estimate of respiratory period from control cycles
collected before onset of stimulus application. No stimuli were applied
later than at 88% of mean control expiratory duration. The briefest
stimulus onset delays were <1 s after inspiratory offset. For each
bout, stimuli were applied for up to four different delays, evenly
spaced between shortest and longest, and 2-15 repetitions of each
stimulus delay were applied.
Data acquisition, real-time signal processing, and
stimulus control. Respiratory-related motoneuronal
activity recorded from C1 was
amplified and filtered by using a low-noise amplifier (band pass = 100-10 kHz, gain = 50,000 times) and stored on tape.
After being full-wave rectified and integrated (time constant Data analysis. Periods and stimulus
delays were normalized by using the mean of control cycle periods from
within each bout. Normalized data were pooled across bouts and
experiments. Stimulus effect as a function of stimulus delay was
tabulated by sorting normalized stimulus delays into four bins:
0-0.2, 0.2-0.4, 0.4-0.6, and 0.6-1.0 (Fig.
1B). Test cycles associated with
stimuli were sorted into bins as a function of the stimulus delay.
For each bout, we tested for stimulus effects on cycles subsequent to
the perturbed cycle by using paired
t-tests between normalized unperturbed
periods, indexed sequentially from the perturbed period. Because we
calculated multiple t-tests, we
applied Bonferroni correction on the computed
P values. For slow time-course changes
in respiratory rhythm within a bout, we compared the initial control
cycles of each bout with control cycles of subsequent bouts by using
single-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) implemented with Excel
(Microsoft).
We assessed whether stimulus effect varied as a function of stimulus
modality or delay by using two-way ANOVA. Because the datasets were of
unequal size, we used the general linear model module in SAS. The
normalized perturbed periods for a given bout were divided into five
bins as a function of delay, and the average for each bin in a given
bout was the unit of analysis, with normalized control periods for each
bout (average = 1.0) included as well. In the ANOVA analysis, two
factors were considered: stimulus type and delay bin. Factor delay bin
had five categories, the elements of which were the means of perturbed
periods for that bin from all bouts (categories
1-4) as well as the means of control cycles (category 0). Factor stimulus type
categorized bin means for each bout according to stimulus type
(categories 1-4) and included control cycles (category 0). We
compared means post hoc using the Tukey least significant difference
criterion for significance for all combinations of stimulus type and
delay bin.
All stimulus modalities prolonged expiration. Control cycles were
normally distributed, whereas perturbed periods appeared bimodal, with
the lower mode overlapping with the control period distribution. There
is little overlap between the histograms of stimulus delays and control
period (Fig. 2B), confirming that stimuli were applied within expiration.
We tested whether stimulus effects persisted into the cycles after
their application by comparing each period immediately following a
stimulus application to all other unperturbed periods following that
stimulus application (Fig.
3A). In
3 of 26 bouts (Burst/Tonic: 2 occurrences, and Inflate/Deflate: 1 occurrence), the period following the perturbed period was
significantly different from the other unperturbed periods
(P < 0.05).
We tested for slow time-course changes in respiratory frequency over
the course of an experiment by carrying out
t-tests, in which the first 20 control
periods of a bout were compared with 20 control periods from the
preceding bout, and we found no significant differences
(P To assess the effect of stimulus delay and stimulus modality on
perturbed period, we plotted normalized perturbed periods as a function
of stimulus delay (Fig. 4). Across stimulus
modalities, the effects of stimuli were variable, with a subset of test
cycles in most delay bins for all stimulus modalities clustered at 1.
We tested whether control cycles were significantly different from
perturbed cycles and whether perturbed cycles were significantly different as a function of stimulus delay or stimulus modality by using
repeated-measures ANOVA with two factors: stimulus type and stimulus
delay (Fig. 5). For both factors, the
difference between control and perturbed periods was statistically
significant (P < 0.01). Within
factor stimulus type, all stimulus modalities were significantly
different from control. Of all stimulus types, Inflate/Deflate elicited
the weakest response, and means from bin
3 were not significantly different from control. For
factor stimulus delay, bins 1-4
were not found to be significantly different from each other but all
were significantly different from control (bin
0). No interaction effects between stimulus delay and
stimulus modality were statistically significant.
Pulmonary stretch receptor modulation of respiratory pattern plays an
important role in the regulation of ventilation in both adult and
neonatal mammals. We used electrical and mechanical stimuli to activate
pulmonary afferent pathways and were able to obtain consistent
expiratory lengthening in response to stimuli applied during
expiration.
Our results support the hypothesis that the neural substrate associated
with the Hering-Breuer reflex in vivo is preserved in a highly reduced
in vitro brain stem-lung preparation from neonatal rat. We replicated
the finding of Murakoshi and Otsuka (10) that lung inflation during
expiration produces expiratory lengthening in the in vitro brain
stem / lung preparation from neonatal rat but we did so by using
applied pressures in the physiological range (3-8
cmH2O vs. 20 cmH2O). In addition, we obtained
expiratory lengthening by using electrical stimulation. Thus we can
consistently modulate respiratory rhythm by activation of a
well-characterized afferent pathway in vitro. The presence of test
cycles periods close to 1 (Fig. 4) is consistent either with stimulus
amplitudes close to the minimum required to elicit expiratory
lengthening or with relatively weak modulation of respiratory rhythm by
this afferent pathway in the in vitro preparation.
We did not apply stimuli sufficiently late in expiration to test
whether the loss of effect to stimuli applied after 90% of expiration
observed in vivo (6, 13) could be reproduced in vitro. We avoided
stimuli applied close to the expected onset time of the next
inspiratory burst for two reasons:
1) to avoid false positive responses
for electrical stimuli, which could arise because inspiratory burst
detection was disabled during stimulus application to mask stimulus
transients; and 2) to avoid false negative responses for mechanical stimuli, which would occur if over
the course of stimulus application (0.3-0.8 s) inspiratory onset
preceded mechanoreceptor activation.
Although both mechanical and electrical stimuli gave rise to expiratory
lengthening, it does not follow that the observed lengthening was
achieved by the same means. As Breuer originally noted (5), electrical
stimulation of the vagus nerve activates afferent pathways in a
synchronous and nonspecific manner, so that cardiovascular afferents,
as well as rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors and C fibers, may all
contribute to the response obtained under electrical stimulation. In
neonates, this problem may be particularly pronounced, since
myelination of vagal fibers may be incomplete, and thus
the threshold differences, which allow for the selective activation of
myelinated fibers in adults, would not exist.
Inflate/Deflate produced the weakest expiratory lengthening of all
modalities used. By contrast, Inflate/Hold produced robust lengthening
of expiration. The difference in response to transient and tonic
mechanoreceptor activation suggests that expiratory lengthening
obtained by Inflate/Hold is sustained by the tonic firing properties of
SAR afferents.
Although our preparation differs from in vivo in that afferent feedback
is only present in test cycles, we have nonetheless confirmed that the
pathway mediating mechanoreceptor afferent modulation of respiratory
rhythm is preserved in vitro and responds to pressure changes within
the physiological range. This finding strengthens the link between
fictive respiration in vitro and eupnea in vivo.
Fig. 1.
A: schematic of preparation, ventral
surface up. Preparation consists of brain stem/spinal cord, lungs,
trachea, and heart. Bone fragments are left attached to preserve vagi
bilaterally. Two types of perturbations are applied: electrical
stimulation of cut vagus nerve (right,
$) or lung inflation via induced volume changes of saline-filled lungs.
Drawing adapted from Bergren and Peterson (2).
B: schema of stimulus protocol. Time
of stimulus application was categorized into bins
1-4 as indicated here. Stimuli were either
electrical (I) or mechanical (P; lung inflation) and were either
maintained until the subsequent inspiratory burst (Burst/Tonic,
Inflate/Hold) or transient (Burst, Inflate/Deflate). Solid horizontal
line indicates threshold for burst detection. Dashed vertical lines
indicate inspiratory onset; respiratory period is defined as time
interval between consecutive inspiratory bursts.
[View Larger Version of this Image (18K GIF file)]
Fig. 2.
A: rectified integrated respiratory
activity recorded from C1 ventral
root. Square wave indicates stimulus application.
B: histogram of normalized stimulus
delays (range 0.1-0.8; thick line), normalized control cycle
periods (mean = 1.0; thin line), and normalized perturbed cycle periods
from all experiments, across stimulus types and modalities (dashed
line). Scale on left for stimulus
(stim) and perturbed period counts (#), scale on
right for control (ctrl)
cycles.
[View Larger Version of this Image (15K GIF file)]
20 ms), activity was digitized by using a workstation (VAXlab
3200). The computer detected and stored inspiratory burst onset times
and displayed cycle period in real time. In addition, the computer controlled the syringe pump or stimulator, applying stimuli at appropriate delays. All software was developed by using the RTI graphical programming interface (Kinetic Systems).
Fig. 3.
A: normalized periods of perturbed and
unperturbed cycles from 1 bout (burst stimulus, delay range
0.2-0.7). Perturbed cycles are indicated by arrow; 4 following
unperturbed cycles are indexed relative to perturbed cycle. Mean
control period for this bout: 7.2 s.
B: time-course of control cycle
periods from a single experiment, pooled across bouts.
C: histogram of control cycle period
means for all bouts.
[View Larger Version of this Image (11K GIF file)]
0.12). Control periods collected over 90 min are shown in Fig. 3B. A
histogram of mean control periods is shown in Fig.
3C.
Fig. 4.
Binned normalized perturbed periods from all bouts as a function of
stimulus delay for each stimulus type. Gray squares indicate mean of
perturbed periods for bins 1-4.
[View Larger Version of this Image (24K GIF file)]
Fig. 5.
Result of 2-way analysis of variance of perturbed period means as a
function of binned stimulus delay and stimulus type. Error bars were
calculated as mean squared error of all means included in analysis,
divided by square root of average number of elements in each category
(5.02), all multiplied by critical
t-value (1.99). Solid line indicates
mean of control periods; if error bars do not cross this line,
associated category of analysis of variance is significantly different
from control periods. Only Inflate/Deflate, bin 3, failed to reach statistical
significance (*).
[View Larger Version of this Image (50K GIF file)]
We thank Jeff Gornbein for assistance with SAS.
Address for reprint requests: N. M. Mellen, Dept. of Physiological Science, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, 2927 Life Science Bldg., Box 951527, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1527 (E-mail: nmellen{at}ucla.edu).
Received 30 January 1997; accepted in final form 4 July 1997.
| 1. | Adrian, E. D. Afferent impulses in the vagus and their effect on respiration. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 79: 332-358, 1933. |
| 2. |
Bergren, D. R.,
and
D. F. Peterson.
Identification of vagal sensory receptors in the rat lung: are there subtypes of slowly adapting receptors?
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
464:
681-698,
1993 |
| 3. |
Bonham, A. C.,
and
D. R. McCrimmon.
Neurones in a discrete region of the nucleus tractus solitarius are required for the Breuer-Hering reflex in rat.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
427:
261-280,
1990 |
| 4. |
Boyd, T. E.,
and
C. A. Maaske.
Vagal inhibition of inspiration, and acompanying changes of respiratory rhythm.
J. Neurophysiol.
2:
533-542,
1939.
|
| 5. | Breuer, J. Self-steering of respiration through the nervus vagus. In: Breathing: Breuer-Hering Centenary Symposium, edited by R. Porter. London: Churchill, 1970, p. 365-394, vol. LXVII, pt. II, p. 909-937, 1868.] |
| 6. |
Feldman, J. L.,
and
H. Gautier.
Interaction of pulmonary afferents and pneumotaxic center in control of respiratory pattern in cats.
J. Neurophysiol.
39:
31-44,
1976 |
| 7. | Funk, G. D., and J. L. Feldman. Generation of respiratory rhythm and pattern in mammals: insights from developmental studies. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 5: 778-785, 1995[Medline]. |
| 8. | Mellen, N. M., P. A. Gray, and J. L. Feldman. Phase-dependent effects of vagal stimulation on respiratory pattern in the isolated neonate rat brain stem/spinal cord. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 20: 542, 1994. |
| 9. | Milsom, W. K. Comparative aspects of vertebrate pulmonary mechanics. In: Comparative Pulmonary Physiology: Current Concepts, edited by S. C. Wood. New York: Dekker, 1989, vol. 39, p. 587-620. (Lung Biol. Health Dis. Ser.) |
| 10. |
Murakoshi, T.,
and
M. Otsuka.
Respiratory reflexes in an isolated brain stem-lung preparation of the newborn rat: possible involvement of -aminobutyric acid and glycine.
Neurosci. Lett.
62:
63-68,
1985[Medline].
|
| 11. | Smith, J. C., and J. L. Feldman. In vitro brain stem-spinal cord preparations for study of motor systems for mammalian respiration and locomotion. J. Neurosci. Methods 21: 321-333, 1987[Medline]. |
| 12. |
Smith, J. C.,
J. J. Greer,
G. Liu,
and
J. L. Feldman.
Neural mechanisms generating respiratory pattern in mammalian brain stem-spinal cord in vitro I. Spatiotemporal patterns of motor and medullary neuron activity.
J. Neurophysiol.
64:
1149-1169,
1990 |
| 13. | Widdicombe, J. G. Respiratory reflexes in man and other mammalian species. Clin. Sci. (Lond.) 21: 163-170, 1961. [Medline] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. M. St John Noeud vital for breathing in the brainstem: gasping--yes, eupnoea--doubtful Phil Trans R Soc B, September 12, 2009; 364(1529): 2625 - 2633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Harris and W. M. St.-John Phasic pulmonary stretch receptor feedback modulates both eupnea and gasping in an in situ rat preparation Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2005; 289(2): R450 - R455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Mellen, M. Roham, and J. L. Feldman Afferent modulation of neonatal rat respiratory rhythm in vitro: cellular and synaptic mechanisms J. Physiol., May 1, 2004; 556(3): 859 - 874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Harris and W. M. St.-John Tonic pulmonary stretch receptor feedback modulates both eupnea and gasping in an in situ rat preparation Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2003; 285(1): R215 - R221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Marchenko, A. R. Granata, and M. I. Cohen Respiratory cycle timing and fast inspiratory discharge rhythms in the adult decerebrate rat Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, October 1, 2002; 283(4): R931 - R940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Mellen and J. L. Feldman Phasic Vagal Sensory Feedback Transforms Respiratory Neuron Activity In Vitro J. Neurosci., September 15, 2001; 21(18): 7363 - 7371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Mellen and J. L. Feldman Phasic Lung Inflation Shortens Inspiration and Respiratory Period in the Lung-Attached Neonate Rat Brain Stem Spinal Cord J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2000; 83(5): 3165 - 3168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Rekling, G. D. Funk, D. A. Bayliss, X.-W. Dong, and J. L. Feldman Synaptic Control of Motoneuronal Excitability Physiol Rev, April 1, 2000; 80(2): 767 - 852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Hilaire and B. Duron Maturation of the Mammalian Respiratory System Physiol Rev, April 1, 1999; 79(2): 325 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |