|
|
||||||||
1 Akademisch Ziekenhuis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium; 2 Karolinska Institute, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden; 3 Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0931; 4 Biomedical Physics Laboratory, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
Verbanck, Sylvia, Hans Larsson, Dag Linnarsson, G. Kim
Prisk, John B. West, and Manuel Paiva. Pulmonary tissue volume, cardiac output and diffusing capacity in sustained microgravity. J. Appl. Physiol. 83(3): 810-816, 1997.
In microgravity (µG) humans have marked changes in body
fluids, with a combination of an overall fluid loss and a
redistribution of fluids in the cranial direction. We investigated
whether interstitial pulmonary edema develops as a result of a headward
fluid shift or whether pulmonary tissue fluid volume is reduced as a
result of the overall loss of body fluid. We measured pulmonary tissue
volume (Vti), capillary blood flow, and diffusing capacity in four
subjects before, during, and after 10 days of exposure to µG during
spaceflight. Measurements were made by rebreathing a gas mixture
containing small amounts of acetylene, carbon monoxide, and argon.
Measurements made early in flight in two subjects showed no change in
Vti despite large increases in stroke volume (40%) and diffusing
capacity (13%) consistent with increased pulmonary capillary blood
volume. Late in-flight measurements in four subjects showed a 25%
reduction in Vti compared with preflight controls
(P < 0.001). There was a
concomittant reduction in stroke volume, to the extent that it was no
longer significantly different from preflight control. Diffusing
capacity remained elevated (11%; P < 0.05) late in flight. These findings suggest that, despite
increased pulmonary perfusion and pulmonary capillary blood volume,
interstitial pulmonary edema does not result from exposure to µG.
spaceflight; zero gravity; acetylene rebreathing experiments
TWO OF THE BEST DOCUMENTED physiological responses to
weightlessness ever since the early manned spaceflights are the
cephalad shift of bodily fluids and the net loss of body weight. There are variable results concerning the amplitude of these changes and
their dependence on time spent in flight and recovery postflight [see Norsk and Epstein (12) for review]. On the basis of
the cephalad fluid shift, together with a postulated increase in
central venous pressure in microgravity (µG), predictions for manned
spaceflight included a risk for interstitial pulmonary edema (14). The
loss of body weight has been associated with loss in bodily fluids, including interstitial fluid and plasma volume, as well as loss of a
so-called lean body mass and fat components (10). The contribution of
different body compartments to the overall body fluid deficit has been
estimated by an electrical impedance method that showed a loss of fluid
in lower extremities (4). Simultaneous ultrasonic measurements of soft
tissue thickness on the tibia and on the forehead in the same subjects
showed similar results (9).
On the one hand, one might expect to see a marked increase in pulmonary
tissue volume (Vti) early in spaceflight caused by a headward shift in
body fluids (12), by an increase in pulmonary capillary blood volume
(15), and by any interstitial pulmonary edema that may have occurred
(14). On the other hand, the overall loss of body fluids (12), and the
suggestion that lung interstitial tissue has a lower
compliance for fluid accumulation than do some other body tissues
(e.g., muscle; see Ref. 11), may result in a decrease in Vti.
In the present study, we report the first measurement of Vti in
weightlessness, obtained by means of the inert soluble gas-rebreathing method. As well as Vti, which incorporates pulmonary capillary blood
volume, the acetylene
(C2H2)-rebreathing
tests performed by four astronauts during the 10-day Spacelab-D2
mission, also allowed computation of cardiac output
(
c) and stroke volume (SV). The latter parameters
have been obtained in space before, both from using nitrous oxide
rebreathing tests performed during the SLS-1 mission (15) and from
echocardiographic (ECG) measurements during the STS51-D mission (6).
From the carbon monoxide (CO)-rebreathing traces, we also calculated
CO-diffusing capacity
(DLCO).
c, SV, and
DLCO showed
marked increases after only ~24 h in µG and trends that are
consistent with previous results obtained during the SLS-1 mission
covering a comparable period of sustained µG. In contrast, we
observed no significant change in Vti after ~24 h in µG and a 25%
decrease with respect to ground (1-G) control by the end of the 10-day
exposure to µG, with a slow recovery postflight.
Equipment.
A dedicated respiratory-monitoring system (Innovision, Odense, Denmark)
had been developed for the European Space Agency specifically for this
flight. It was part of Anthrorack, a comprehensive laboratory facility
for human physiology studies. Basic features of the respiratory monitoring system were described earlier (19). Briefly, it consisted of
a quadrupole mass spectrometer for gas analysis and a respiratory valve
unit from which the astronaut could either breathe cabin air through
non-rebreathing valves or could rebreathe from a 4-liter bag. A
manually operated rotary valve permitted the subject to switch between
these two breathing modes. Volumes dispensed into the rebreathing bag
were calibrated pre- and postflight with a water-displacement
spirometer.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
c, and
DLCO.
c was determined by the method of Sackner (17),
including the time 0 correction.
Regression was performed on the expiratory
C2H2
data from breath number three onward. The C18O signal was used for
application of the Sackner time 0 correction on
c and Vti. [See Verbanck and
Paiva (20) for equations and details.] Heart rate (HR) was
determined from the ECG signal over the time interval corresponding to
the rebreathing maneuver. From
c and HR, we
determined SV.
DLCO was
directly obtained from the C18O
signal, according to Sackner (17). Although
DLCO was
measured at two levels of O2
(Table 1), we only report the low
O2 data. Because of the limited
number of in-flight data points, it was not possible to get a complete
set of values for membrane diffusing capacity and capillary volume. The
low-O2
DLCO values
were also divided by the mean alveolar volume (end-tidal volume plus
half the rebreathing-bag volume) to give CO diffusing capacity per unit
lung volume
(KCO).
Statistical methods.
To study the time course of each parameter throughout the different
stages in flight and postflight, we normalized data at each time for
each subject by the preflight average value for that subject in the
same way as was done for the SLS-1 data (15). In this way, the
preflight average of the four subjects is 100% by definition, and
preflight SE reflect intrasubject measurement variability. In-flight
and postflight SE corresponding to the average values of the four
subjects are a combination of intrasubject measurement variability
and intersubject variability in response at each stage
of the study.
Statistical analysis was performed by using Systat version 5.0 (Systat,
Evanston, IL). Data were grouped according to session (preflight, early
in flight, late in flight, R+2, R+4, R+9), using either all four
subjects or a subset of only two subjects. Additionally, rebreathing
results from all subjects were pooled into preflight, in-flight, and
postflight data sets. In each case, a two-way analysis of variance was
performed to test for differences between the chosen categories.
Whenever F ratios were significant,
post hoc pair wise comparisons were tested for significance with the
Bonferroni adjustment. The P < 0.05 level was used as the criterion for significance.
Table 2 lists the average preflight values of all measured parameters on the four subjects. All parameters except DLCO and KCO, where a change was expected, were not significantly different when computed from the rebreathing tests with low-O2 or high-O2 rebreathing gas and are obtained from four low-O2 and four high-O2 tests, i.e., eight data points (see Table 1). DLCO and KCO values in Table 2 are subject averages of the four preflight low-O2 rebreathing tests. In general, preflight SE values were of the order of 2-3%, except for Vti which had an average preflight SE of 4.5%.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Figures 1-4 show the changes of normalized averages (± SE) of
all parameters in Table 2 as a function of time during and after a
10-day period of µG. The preflight data point (
at 100%) results
from pooling all data from the two preflight experiment sessions and
has an arbitrary time tag for clarity of representation. For in-flight
and postflight sessions, intervals on the time axis are representative
of the number of days separating the experiment sessions. All
symbols are the average results from the four subjects whenever
rebreathing data were collected on all four subjects within 24 h of
each other. This was the case for the late in-flight session and during
all postflight experiment sessions. All
symbols represent the
averages of rebreathing data from subjects
1 and 2 only. For the
early in-flight sessions, these are the only data available. For late
in flight, these are a subset of the rebreathing data available on all
four subjects (Table 1). We display the data in this manner to avoid
statistically skewing results from differing subject populations.
FRC (Fig. 1) was reduced in flight compared
with preflight, although this was no longer significant in four
subjects measured late in flight. Based on data from
subjects 1 and
2, FRC did not change in flight
between the early and the late data collection sessions. Vti (Fig.
2) was unchanged early in flight compared with preflight (n = 2), but by late in
flight Vti showed a significant reduction of ~25%
(n = 4;
P < 0.001). Postflight,
Vti remained depressed through R+9 but showed a trend toward a return
to normal.
c (Fig.
3A) was
elevated early in flight (n = 2) and
returned to preflight control by late in flight. This was confounded by significant changes in HR (Fig. 3B),
which was depressed early in flight and significantly elevated on R+2.
SV (Fig. 3C) provides a clearer
picture and shows a large (~40%) increase early in flight, but SV is
reduced by late in flight to a level not significantly different from
preflight controls. Both DLCO (Fig.
4A)
and KCO (Fig.
4B) were significantly elevated in
both the early and the late in-flight sessions and returned to baseline
postflight. There was no apparent temporal change in either
DLCO or
KCO postflight.
) or
subjects 1-2 (
) are expressed
as %individual preflight average (see MATERIALS AND
METHODS for details). * Significant difference of
in-flight averages for subjects 1 and
2 (
) with respect to their
preflight averages.
# Significant differences of
averages of all 4 subjects at any given time (
) with respect to
their preflight average. P values refer to comparison of pooled data (4 subjects; all in flight vs. all
preflight, all in flight vs. all postflight, and all preflight vs. all
postflight). In-flight FRC trend (dotted line) was not significant
(P > 0.1).
) or
subjects 1-2 (
) are expressed
as %individual preflight average.
# Significant differences of
averages of all 4 subjects at any given time (
) with respect to
their preflight average. In-flight Vti trend (dotted line) was not
significant (P > 0.1).
) or subjects 1-2 (
)
are expressed as %individual preflight average.
A: cardiac output
(
c) behavior in microgravity and at 2, 4, and 9 days
postflight (R+2, R+4, R+9, respectively) compared with preflight
baseline values. In-flight
c trend (dotted line) was
not significant (NS; P = 0.06).
B: heart rate (HR) behavior in
microgravity and 2, 4 and 9 days postflight with respect to preflight
baseline values. In-flight HR trend (dotted line) was significant
(P < 0.05).
C : stroke volume (SV) derived from
c and HR in A and
B. In-flight SV trend (dotted line)
was significant (P < 0.05).
) or subjects 1-2 (
) are
expressed as %individual preflight average.
A: lung CO-diffusing capacity
(DLCO)
behavior in microgravity and at 2, 4, and 9 days postflight compared
with preflight baseline values.
DLCO values are those derived from rebreathing under
low-O2 conditions (see MATERIALS AND METHODS for details).
In-flight
DLCO trend
(dotted line) was not significant (P > 0.1). B: CO-diffusing capacity per
unit alveolar volume
(KCO), where
alveolar volume is taken to be end-expiratory lung volume plus one-half
tidal volume, i.e., one-half rebreathing bag volume. In-flight
KCO trend (dotted
line) was not significant (P > 0.1).
This paper reports a set of cardiopulmonary parameters obtained during a sustained 10-day period of weightlessness aboard the Spacelab-D2 mission. The major difference between our experiments and previous measurements during spaceflight (15) is that, by using C2H2 and CO in the rebreathing gas mixture, we were able to compute Vti. A Vti value of, say, 600 ml measured from soluble gas rebreathing (17, 20) comprises ~100 ml dry tissue, 100 ml capillary blood volume, and 400 ml extravascular fluid (2). As such, its value in weightlessness could be increased by a cephalad fluid shift and/or interstitial pulmonary edema or could be decreased by a net loss of body fluid.
Although one might expect a Vti increase due to the fluid shift from
the lower body compartments, this was clearly not the case for the two
subjects studied after ~24 h of µG (Fig. 2). A possible explanation
is that the loss of body fluid counteracts, and therefore masks, the
Vti increase that the cephalad fluid shift might have caused. A summary
of data from Apollo and Skylab missions reported in a review by Norsk
and Epstein (12) shows that decreases in total body mass start within
the first day of spaceflight. In flight, the decreasing Vti trend did
not reach significance for the subgroup of subjects
1 and 2 (dotted line between
, Fig. 2). However, the decrease of the average Vti value for all four subjects late in flight with respect to the preflight baseline was found to be highly significant
(P < 0.001) and considerably below
baseline (a 25% decrease). Together with the late in-flight Vti data,
the steady and consistent slow recovery toward preflight baseline Vti
values during the 10-day period after the mission also supports a
correlation between the decrease of Vti and the net loss of body fluids
in µG. The temporal changes of Vti indeed mimic the body
weight profiles summarized in Norsk and Epstein (12). Unfortunately, we
have too few data points to actually correlate Vti with body mass,
because body mass measurements were performed neither onboard
Spacelab-D2 nor during the R+9 session. Nevertheless, in support of the
relation between a Vti decrease and body fluid loss, we note the
average body weight decrease of 2.5 kg between preflight and R+2 and
the average increase of 0.6 kg between R+2 and R+15 (i.e., the session
where body weight was determined closest to and after R+9).
The Vti derived from the C2H2 rebreathing test has been used to assess clinically mild and even inapparent interstitial pulmonary edema in humans, with Vti values ranging from 100 to 200 ml/l of TLC (the corresponding Vti value for a group of normal subjects was 80 ml/l of TLC) (13). Permutt (14) hypothesized that subclinical pulmonary edema could develop on entry into the µG environment, and, if this were the case, it would be expected to increase Vti. The lack of an increase in Vti early in flight suggests that interstitial pulmonary edema does not occur as a result of exposure to µG. Nevertheless, we cannot totally exclude the possibility that a net fluid loss could have masked any potential factors contributing to Vti increase, such as the postulated interstitial pulmonary edema. Even if edema were to have occurred early in flight, the marked Vti decrease late in flight suggests that it must have resorbed later in flight. However, the hypothesis of time dependence in the occurrence and resorption of interstitial pulmonary edema is contradicted by the membrane diffusing-capacity data obtained in µG by Prisk et al. (15). In particular, the increase in membrane diffusing capacity in µG and the absence of any dependence on time spent in flight over a 10-day flight, counters the suggestion that the in-flight time dependence of Vti could have been due to early edema and absence thereof late in flight. Taken together, these data suggest that interstitial pulmonary edema as a result of exposure to µG did not occur.
The changes that we observed suggest that, despite documented cephalad fluid shifts from the lower extremities (4, 9, 12), this fluid does not move to the gas-exchanging region of the lung. Such a conclusion is consistent with recent findings of the absence of a rise in central venous pressure (5) and with the finding that the pulmonary interstitium is up to 30 times less compliant than other body tissues with respect to fluid accumulation (11). The transendothelial filtration coefficient and the Starling pressures (hydrostatic and osmotic pressure differences between capillary and interstitum) determine the rate and direction of fluid transfer. Increased capillary recruitment must be assumed to have increased the transendothelial filtration coefficient (11), but this effect appears to be reversed by the combined influences of a loss of plasma water (12) and the low tissue compliance in the lung, the latter tending to increase the hydrostatic tissue pressure markedly for any given increase of tissue fluid volume. Thus, despite clear evidence of excessive fluid in the tissues of the upper body, as evidenced by puffy faces, increased tissue thickness (9), and increased pulmonary capillary blood volume and SV (15), the lungs do not develop interstitial pulmonary edema in µG.
The other cardiopulmonary parameters computed here were FRC,
c,
DLCO, and
KCO, which can
all be compared with recently reported data obtained during the
Spacelab SLS-1 mission (7, 15). For instance, the FRC decreases in µG
shown in Fig. 1 are in good agreement with the 15% decrease reported
by Elliott et al. (7): an 8% FRC decrease for the four subjects (
)
and an average 16% FRC decrease for the subset of two subjects (
).
Also consistent with the findings of Elliott et al. (7) is the fact
that FRC did not show any adaptation effects between early and late in flight.
c increases early in flight and returns to 12% below
baseline toward the end of the mission. Postflight
c
is not significantly different from 100% from R+2 onward. The general
pattern is compatible with the SLS-1 data (15), except that the
magnitude of the initial (~24 h) increase was <50% the increase in
c observed in SLS-1 (14% in D-2 vs. 35% in SLS-1).
In both studies,
c was no longer significantly different from preflight baseline value by the end of the
mission and postflight. The impact of the different methods used for
computation of
c [namely, the methods of
Sackner et al. (17) in D-2, the method of Ayotte et al. (3) in SLS-1, and the use of
C2H2
instead of N2O] are expected
to be small, and the differences more likely reflect differences
between the subject populations, especially with respect to the HR
response. As in SLS-1, the SV pattern amplifies the
behavior of
c, with a more marked increase early in
flight due to a combination of the 14% rise in
c
and a 19% decrease in HR. The initial change we
observed in SV was 40%, which was also smaller than that seen during
SLS-1 (15). The overall pattern of change was also similar, with a SV
that is not significantly different from baseline by the end of the
mission.
Finally, the diffusing capacity results (DLCO and KCO) coincide with the SLS-1 observations, namely that diffusing capacity increases in µG to a new steady-state level, supporting the concept of uniform capillary filling. Of particular interest is the fact that the techniques used in D-2 and SLS-1 were different, namely rebreathing vs. single-breath breath-hold test. The single-breath test was a vital capacity maneuver, with the measurement of CO uptake being essentially performed at TLC, where significantly negative intrathoracic pressures may have enhanced pulmonary capillary filling in µG. In contrast, the rebreathing maneuver used here (i.e., a breathing pattern with a baseline end-expiratory lung volume corresponding to FRC and a tidal volume of ~2 liters) effectively determines DLCO for a mean lung volume of approximately FRC + 1 liter, providing more normal physiological conditions.
Direct comparison of DLCO values between SLS-1 and D-2 is not possible. Two comparative studies (1, 16) exist where DLCO values have been measured in the same subjects at rest by using both the single-breath and the rebreathing technique. When comparing measurements performed at similar lung volumes, Adaro et al. (1) found that DLCO was 30% larger when measured by rebreathing compared with the single-breath method. However, Rose et al. (16) found no DLCO differences by using either technique at two selected lung volumes. The difference in volume at which DLCO is measured in the D-2 and SLS-1 study is a good reason to compare KCO instead, even though KCO itself is also known to depend on alveolar volume. In fact, Stam et al. (18) found KCO to increase by ~30% when performing the single-breath maneuver at 50% instead of 100% TLC. When deriving KCO from the DLCO values and alveolar volumes reported in Rose et al. (16), KCO is found to be only 10% larger when performing the single-breath test or rebreathing test at approximately FRC + 1.5 liters rather than near TLC. The results of Adaro et al. (1) and Stam et al. (18) both contribute to explain the 50% larger preflight KCO values in D-2 than in SLS-1. Nevertheless, the findings of Rose et al. (16) would have predicted smaller differences between SLS-1 and D-2 on purely technical grounds. Also, the slightly higher alveolar O2 concentration (typically 20-25%) in D-2 with respect to SLS-1 (16-18%) is expected to have a small but counteracting effect on the quantitative discrepancy between KCO results obtained from both missions. Despite these methodological differences and any supposed physiological effects that might be induced, the results obtained in D-2 and SLS-1 are similar. Figure 4B shows that the 32% increase of KCO in response to µG was actually in quantitative agreement with Prisk et al. (15), who found KCO increases ~25% without any significant difference between measurements performed at different stages of the mission.
Because we have not been able to subdivide DLCO into its components, capillary volume and membrane diffusing capacity (because of too few data points for each level of O2 concentration), we cannot confirm the most important finding of the SLS-1 study, namely the increase of both these components in µG and, derived from it, the µG model suggesting more uniform capillary filling in µG. Nevertheless, by obtaining an increase of the low-O2 DLCO with respect to preflight (with a good agreement when normalizing for alveolar volume, i.e., KCO), at least one of the conditions leading up to this model was met. We might have expected to see an increase in Vti in µG due to the likely increase in pulmonary capillary volume, since Vti incorporates capillary blood volume. However, it is most probable that the Vti parameter obtained by rebreathing is not sufficiently sensitive to pick up a capillary blood volume increase on the order of only 20 ml (15).
Reproducibility and variability of the results. Preflight SE in
c and
DLCO are
shown for each subject in Table 2 and were <3%. This is comparable
to the SE obtained in the SLS-1 study (15), where approximately twice
the number of preflight rebreathing tests could be used for analysis.
Our coefficients of variation for
c (8%),
DLCO (6%),
and Vti (12%) are close to typical values given in Jensen et al. (8),
i.e.,
c (7%), DLCO (6%),
and Vti (10%), also obtained from small samples of rebreathing
measurements.
We had relatively few repeated-measurement opportunities in flight,
where only one set of measurements after ~24 h of µG could be made
on two subjects and another set on all four subjects late in flight.
The subsets of data from subjects 1 and 2 (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4,
) were
insufficient to be able to draw firm conclusions about temporal changes
of any of the parameters recorded in flight. They nevertheless show
that the observed trends are consistent with the temporal changes or
the absence of change observed by Prisk et al. (15).
In conclusion, using different hardware and different techniques, we
showed in a separate population that the observations of a transient
increase in SV, followed by a decline to near preflight levels over the
course of ~1 wk of µG, were correct (15). Similarly, a decrease in
FRC was observed (7) that persisted for the duration of µG exposure.
In particular, the rebreathing measurements of DLCO
support the prior observation of greater uniformity in pulmonary capillary filling in µG. This is important, because the rebreathing technique we employed avoids questions regarding highly negative intrathoracic pressures that might occur during the TLC breath hold of
the single-breath
DLCO
method. We measured Vti for the first time in µG. In contrast to our
expectations, Vti was not increased during early exposure to µG. This
suggests that the previously postulated interstitial pulmonary edema
(14) likely does not occur. The further decrease in Vti with continued
exposure to µG and the slow return toward normal during the recovery
period after flight suggest that this measurement is much more closely related to total body fluid volume than to translocation of fluid into
the thoracic cavity.
We acknowledge the dedication of the crew of the Spacelab-D2 mission and of all members of the Microgravity User Support Center of Cologne and the support of the European Space Agency.
Address for reprint requests: S. Verbanck, Dienst Pneumologie (CPNE), AZ-VUB, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium (E-mail: pnevks{at}az.vub.ac.be).
Received 23 December 1996; accepted in final form 7 May 1997.
| 1. | Adaro, F., M. Meyer, and R. S. Sikand. Rebreathing and single breath pulmonary CO diffusing capacity in man at rest and exercise studied by C18O isotope. Bull. Eur. Physiopathol. Respir. 12: 747-756, 1976[Medline]. |
| 2. | Armstrong, J. D., E. H. Gluck, R. O. Crapo, H. A. Jones, and J. M. Hughes. Lung tissue volume estimated by simultaneous radiographic and helium dilution methods. Thorax 37: 676-679, 1982[Abstract]. |
| 3. |
Ayotte, B.,
L. Seymour,
and
M. B. McIlroy.
A new method for measurement of cardiac output with nitrous oxide.
J. Appl. Physiol.
28:
863-866,
1970 |
| 4. | Baisch, F. J. Fluid distribution in man in space and effect of lower body negative pressure treatment. Clin. Investig. 71: 690-699, 1993[Medline]. |
| 5. |
Buckey, J. C.,
F. A. Gaffney,
L. D. Lane,
B. D. Levine,
D. E. Watenpaugh,
S. J. Wright,
C. W. Yancy,
D. M. Meyer,
and
G. C. Blomqvist.
Central venous pressure in space.
J. Appl. Physiol.
81:
19-25,
1996 |
| 6. | Charles, J. B., and C. M. Lathers. Cardiovascular adaptation to spaceflight. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 31: 1010-1023, 1991[Medline]. |
| 7. |
Elliott, A. R.,
G. K. Prisk,
H. J. B. Guy,
and
J. B. West.
Lung volumes during sustained microgravity on Spacelab SLS-1.
J. Appl. Physiol.
77:
2005-2014,
1994 |
| 8. |
Jensen, R. L.,
R. O. Crapo,
J. D. Mason,
and
F. G. Yanowitz.
Small-sample reproducibility estimates: an example using rebreathing measurements.
J. Appl. Physiol.
68:
1717-1721,
1990 |
| 9. | Kirsch, K. A., F. J. Baartz, H. C. Gunga, and L. Rocker. Fluid shifts into and out of superficial tissues under microgravity and terrestrial conditions. Clin. Investig. 71: 687-689, 1993[Medline]. |
| 10. |
Leonard, J. I.,
C. S. Leach,
and
P. C. Rambaut.
Quantitation of tissue loss during prolonged space flight.
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.
38:
667-679,
1983 |
| 11. |
Miserocchi, G.,
D. Negrini,
M. Del Fabbro,
and
D. Venturoli.
Pulmonary interstitial pressure in intact in situ lung: transition to interstitial edema.
J. Appl. Physiol.
74:
1171-1177,
1993 |
| 12. | Norsk, P., and M. Epstein. Manned space flight and the kidney. Am. J. Nephrol. 11: 81-97, 1991[Medline]. |
| 13. |
Overland, E. S.,
R. N. Gupta,
G. J. Huchon,
and
J. F. Murray.
Measurement of pulmonary tissue volume and blood flow in persons with normal and edematous lungs.
J. Appl. Physiol.
51:
1375-1383,
1981 |
| 14. | Permutt, S. Pulmonary circulation and the distribution of blood and gas in the lungs. In: Physiology in the Space Environment. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council, 1967, p. 38-56, report no. 1485B. |
| 15. |
Prisk, G. K.,
H. J. B. Guy,
A. R. Elliott,
R. A. Deutschman III,
and
J. B. West.
Pulmonary diffusing capacity, capillary blood volume, and cardiac output during sustained microgravity.
J. Appl. Physiol.
75:
15-26,
1993 |
| 16. |
Rose, G. L.,
S. S. Cassidy,
and
R. L. Johnson, Jr.
Diffusing capacity at different lung volumes during breath holding and rebreathing.
J. Appl. Physiol.
47:
32-37,
1979 |
| 17. |
Sackner, M. A.,
G. Markwell,
N. Atkins,
S. J. Birch,
and
R. J. Fernandez.
Rebreathing techniques for pulmonary capillary blood flow and tissue volume.
J. Appl. Physiol.
49:
910-915,
1980 |
| 18. |
Stam, H.,
F. J. A. Kreuzer,
and
A. Verspille.
Effect of lung volume and positional changes on pulmonary diffusing capacity and its components.
J. Appl. Physiol.
71:
1477-1488,
1991 |
| 19. |
Verbanck, S.,
D. Linnarsson,
G. K. Prisk,
and
M. Paiva.
Specific ventilation in microgravity.
J. Appl. Physiol.
80:
1458-1465,
1996 |
| 20. |
Verbanck, S.,
and
M. Paiva.
Theoretical basis for the time 0 correction in the rebreathing analysis.
J. Appl. Physiol.
76:
445-454,
1994 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Norsk, M. Damgaard, L. Petersen, M. Gybel, B. Pump, A. Gabrielsen, and N. J. Christensen Vasorelaxation in Space Hypertension, January 1, 2006; 47(1): 69 - 73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. Christensen, M. Heer, K. Ivanova, and P. Norsk Sympathetic nervous activity decreases during head-down bed rest but not during microgravity J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2005; 99(4): 1552 - 1557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. M. Olfert and G. K. Prisk Effect of 60{degrees} head-down tilt on peripheral gas mixing in the human lung J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2004; 97(3): 827 - 834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P-F. Migeotte, G. K. Prisk, and M. Paiva Microgravity alters respiratory sinus arrhythmia and short-term heart rate variability in humans Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2003; 284(6): H1995 - H2006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Bettinelli, C. Kays, O. Bailliart, A. Capderou, P. Techoueyres, J. L. Lachaud, P. Vaida, and G. Miserocchi Effect of gravity and posture on lung mechanics J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2002; 93(6): 2044 - 2052. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rohdin and D. Linnarsson Differential changes of lung diffusing capacity and tissue volume in hypergravity J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2002; 93(3): 931 - 935. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Montmerle, J. Spaak, and D. Linnarsson Lung function during and after prolonged head-down bed rest J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2002; 92(1): 75 - 83. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Perhonen, F. Franco, L. D. Lane, J. C. Buckey, C. G. Blomqvist, J. E. Zerwekh, R. M. Peshock, P. T. Weatherall, and B. D. Levine Cardiac atrophy after bed rest and spaceflight J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2001; 91(2): 645 - 653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. K. Prisk Physiology of a Microgravity Environment: Invited Review: Microgravity and the lung J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2000; 89(1): 385 - 396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |