Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 83: 776-783, 1997;
8750-7587/97 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Road, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Cairns, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Road, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Cairns, A. M.

Journal of Applied Physiology
Vol. 83, No. 3, pp. 776-783, September 1997
CONTROL OF BREATHING, CIRCULATION, AND TEMPERATURE

Phrenic motoneuron firing rates before, during, and after prolonged inspiratory resistive loading

J. D. Road and A. M. Cairns

Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V5Z 3J5

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Road, J. D., and A. M. Cairns. Phrenic motoneuron firing rates before, during, and after prolonged inspiratory resistive loading. J. Appl. Physiol. 83(3): 776-783, 1997.---Phrenic motoneuron firing rates during brief inspiratory resistive loading (IRL) are high, and nearly all the motoneurons are recruited. Diaphragmatic fatigue has been difficult to demonstrate during IRL. Furthermore, evidence from studies in limb muscles has shown variable motoneuron responses to prolonged high-intensity loads. We studied phrenic motoneuron firing rates before, during, and after prolonged IRL in anesthetized rabbits. Of 117 phrenic axons, only 2 axons were not recruited; 41 axons were silent during unloaded breathing but were recruited at higher loads. Silent axons showed a more rapid increase in firing rate as the load increased. Phrenic motoneuron firing rates increased throughout the period of loading, whereas airway pressure swings did not. After prolonged IRL, higher motoneuron firing rates were needed during brief loads to produce the same airway pressure. No evidence of a decline in motoneuron firing rates was seen at any point. We conclude that the respiratory muscles can be shown to demonstrate physiological responses consistent with fatigue during prolonged IRL, and activation rates are high and remain so throughout this prolonged loading.

respiratory muscles; diaphragm; motor unit recruitment; fatigue


INTRODUCTION

WHEN A MUSCLE CONTRACTS maximally, it can only do so for a limited time before an acute loss of force production or fatigue occurs. Muscles can contract submaximally for more prolonged periods, and in this situation fatigue of single motor units may not result in an acute loss of force in the whole muscle. Force loss during submaximal contractions can be offset by increased firing rate or recruitment of additional motor units (4, 13). The firing rates of motor units, however, have been noted to decline (13, 14, 22) during both sustained maximal or submaximal contractions. Possibly this decline is related to the fact that, as a muscle fatigues, the firing rate required to maintain force output declines, so-called "muscle wisdom" (22). The decline in motor unit firing rates is not a consistent finding, as others have reported an increase (5, 13) or no change (13) in firing rates. In a fatiguing diaphragm, the firing rates of phrenic motoneurons could be modified by sensory feedback. Both excitatory and inhibitory effects of phrenic afferents have been demonstrated (27).

We have previously recorded phrenic motoneuron firing rates during brief periods of inspiratory resistive loading (IRL). Two separate populations of motoneurons were identified, one active during unloaded breathing and a second silent group that became active as loading increased. We found a high level of activation during inspiratory loading that suggested to us that, at least during brief loads, there was no evidence of a reduction in activation. Indeed, activation rates were high, and at higher loads virtually all phrenic motoneurons were recruited (29). Sustained or prolonged IRL at high loads should, therefore, lead to fatigue. However, severe prolonged IRL in the rabbit has not been associated with the typical biochemical parameters of fatigue (11). This finding raises questions about the intensity of diaphragmatic activation during prolonged loading. The only previous study of phrenic motoneuron firing rates during potentially fatiguing contractions (17) found no drop in rates during IRL, but only one recording session lasted beyond 22 min. In the present study, we recorded from single motor units during severe IRL for 30 min while also measuring inspiratory pressures. We hypothesized that comparing phrenic motoneuron firing rates to inspiratory pressures would be a direct and natural way to look for evidence of fatigue. We were also interested in comparing patterns of spike activity between populations of spontaneously active and recruited phrenic motoneurons during prolonged, severe, and potentially fatiguing loads.


METHODS

A detailed description of methods has been given previously (29). New Zealand White rabbits of either sex, weighing 3-4 kg, were anesthetized with ketamine (35 mg/kg im) and xylazine (7 mg/kg im) and maintained with one-third to one-half of the initial dose every 30 min. The trachea was cannulated and connected to a pneumotachograph (Fleisch no. 00) and differential pressure transducer (Validyne MP45) for measuring inspiratory flow. A miniature two-way nonrebreathing valve (model 2814, Hans Rudolph) divided inspiratory and expiratory flows. A side port in the endotracheal tube was connected to a second Validyne pressure transducer for measurement of airway opening pressure (Pao). Dividing Pao by inspiratory flow gave inspiratory resistance that could be adjusted from near zero up to 4 cmH2O · ml-1 · s by means of a needle valve at the inspiratory port of the nonrebreathing valve. Expiration was unimpeded.

A laparotomy was performed, and two stainless steel hooks were placed in the anterior margin of the left costal diaphragm for recording electromyograms (EMGs), which were amplified ×1,000, filtered 10-10,000 Hz, rectified, integrated (tau  = 100 ms), and recorded on a chart recorder (Gould, Cleveland, OH). The laparotomy incision was closed in two layers. Arterial blood-gas samples were taken from a carotid catheter.

In 17 experiments, balloon catheters were placed in the esophagus and under the diaphragm to obtain transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi). However, during severe prolonged loads, measurement of Pdi was often distorted by esophageal contractions. Pao measured in the tracheal tube did not suffer from this problem. Plots of Pao vs. Pdi showed a linear relation that was unchanged after inspiratory loading. When Pdi was not distorted by swallowing, it gave the same qualitative results as Pao, although Pao was ~5 cmH2O less than Pdi for unloaded breathing and exceeded Pdi by 5-10 cmH2O during severe loads (see Fig. 5B). In 15 experiments, Pao alone was measured. Results in this paper refer to Pao, but Pdi showed very similar behavior when it was recorded.


Fig. 5. A: peak firing rate and Paopeak for inspirations during brief loads (5 of different severity) before (open circle ) and after (bullet ) 30 min of severe IRL and 20 min of unloaded recovery. B: Paopeak and peak transdiaphragmatic pressures (Pdi) for same experiment as in 5A, before (open circle ) and after (bullet ) 30 min of severe IRL.
[View Larger Version of this Image (16K GIF file)]

Activity in axons of phrenic motoneurons was recorded from small filaments pulled from the C4 branch of the phrenic nerve and placed on a platinum wire under mineral oil. Unitary recordings were obtained as judged from the uniform size of action potentials, the absence of interspike intervals <5 ms, and the all-or-none response to electrical stimulation of the distal nerve. Electrical stimulation also detected "silent" axons, those with no spike activity during unloaded breathing. When a filament contained two intact axons, one active and the other silent, the unloaded firing rate of the active axon and the inspiratory pressure at recruitment of the silent axon were recorded. Otherwise, observations were made only on filaments containing a single intact axon.

Unit action potentials were discriminated with the trigger circuit of an oscilloscope (model 1421, Gould), and a synchronized pulse of fixed size was integrated (tau  = 50 ms) to give a signal proportional to motoneuron firing rate. This rate signal was calibrated with trains of pulses at known rates, while the interpulse interval on the oscilloscope was observed, and was linear between 10 and 100 Hz.

IRL. IRL were either brief or prolonged. Brief loads at resistances from 0.5 to 4.0 cmH2O · ml-1 · s were applied for <1 min (20-40 breaths) to determine the peak firing rates of phrenic motoneurons at inspiratory peak pressures up to 50 cmH2O. Six loads of different intensity were placed in random order, with 5 min recovery between each, to span the range of airway pressures. Prolonged loads were resistances of 1-2 cmH2O · ml-1 · s. These loads produced peak Pao (Paopeak) of 40-50 cmH2O and were applied for 20-30 min. During loaded breathing, the inspired gas was pure O2, to keep arterial PO2 (PaO2) above hypoxic levels (80 Torr).

The goal of each experiment was to record from a single phrenic motoneuron during a sustained severe IRL from which diaphragmatic recovery might be delayed or incomplete. Therefore, only one prolonged load was applied in each experiment. A precondition to the application of a prolonged load was that an axonal recording must exhibit good isolation throughout the initial series of brief loads. From two to five axons were tested in each rabbit to find a such a unit. A 20-min recovery period followed the prolonged IRL, after which arterial blood gases had returned to baseline, and the six brief loads were then reapplied.

Signals were recorded on chart paper (model 8188-812; Gould). The peak firing rate of motoneurons, Pdi, Pao, and peak integrated EMG of diaphragm (EMGdi) were measured from the chart recordings by using a Jandel Scientific digitizer (Sigma Scan, Corte Madera, CA). The EMGdi, Pao, and axon signals were also acquired to a computerized data collection system (Direc, Raytec Instruments, Vancouver, BC). Data were captured in groups of 10 records; each was 1.8 s long and sampled at 5,000 Hz. Filters were 0-50 Hz for Pao, 300-1,000 Hz for axon, and 10-1,000 Hz for muscle. Computer records were analyzed off-line (Anadat; RHT-Infodat, Montreal, Quebec). Instantaneous firing rates were determined from the axon signal record by taking the inverse of the interspike interval.

Statistics. Variables recorded before, during, and after IRL were tested by a repeated-measures analysis of variance. For variables identified as differing, a Friedman's nonparametric analysis of variance (ANOVA) for matched samples was performed. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.

Previously reported results. Some results on brief IRL have been reported previously (40). In these 17 experiments, both Pao and Pdi were measured. Data from those experiments are pooled below with new results from 15 rabbits in which Pao alone was measured, with two exceptions: 1) Table 1 is from the 15 present experiments only and 2) results on instantaneous firing rates and interspike intervals are reported only for the present experiments in which a computer was used to acquire the data.

Table  1.   Phrenic motoneuron firing rates vs. Pao during brief IRL
Pao, cmH2O Activity During Unloaded Breathing
Yes n No n

No load 28 ± 5.2  34
10 34 ± 6.4  26 30 ± 6.7  3
20 39 ± 7.7  27 45 ± 6.0  6
30 44 ± 9.2  25 56 ± 4.4  7
40 47 ± 11  23 60 ± 8.4  8

Values are means ± SD given in spikes/s; n, no. of motoneurons. Pao, peak pressure at airway opening; IRL, inspiratory resistive loading. Data are from 15 experiments (see Previously reported results).


RESULTS

Brief loads. A total of 117 phrenic axons were classified into three major categories: those that showed spike activity during unloaded breathing, those that became active only during IRL, and those that showed no activity even at the highest inspiratory pressures. Only two axons fell into the third category. Of the remainder, 74 (63%) were active during unloaded breathing, and 41 (35%) were initially silent but began to fire as peak inspiratory pressure increased under the stimulus of an inspiratory load.

As inspiratory effort increased under loading, the inspiratory pressure at which an initially silent motoneuron first showed activity was termed the threshold for recruitment of that motoneuron. This recruitment pressure varied from axon to axon but was a fixed and reproducible value for any given axon. Motoneurons recruited at low or moderate pressures were more common than those recruited at high pressures (Fig. 1). Of 41 silent phrenic motoneurons, 27 (66%) were recruited at a Paopeak of < 30 cmH2O, which is about half the maximal Pao in these rabbits. One phrenic motoneuron was not recruited until Paopeak rose to >70 cmH2O, a level of effort that was usually avoided to reduce the risk of hypoxic or mechanical injury. The two axons categorized above as unresponsive were tested only to a Paopeak of 50 cmH2O and therefore may have been high-threshold phrenic motoneurons.
Fig. 1. Peak airway opening pressures (Paopeak) at which phrenic motoneurons that were silent during unloaded breathing became active during inspiratory resistive loading (IRL).
[View Larger Version of this Image (15K GIF file)]

The time of the first spike activity was measured with reference to the raw diaphragm EMGdi. Early onset of activity was by far the most common finding. Onset times were measured for 64 motoneurons active during unloaded breathing. Of these, 56 (88%) began to fire within the first 20% of the inspiratory time (TI). Two motoneurons that were silent for some unloaded breaths but active for others showed late onset times, from 30 to 55% of TI. For motoneurons only recruited during loads, onset time at recruitment was often not captured because the computer data acquisition was intermittent, but onset was clearly delayed relative to that of units active during unloaded breathing, sometimes to 70% of TI. Onset for initially silent units became earlier as inspiratory effort increased during a load.

In Table 1, firing rates are averaged for 10-cmH2O steps in Paopeak. Units that were active when no load was applied are compared with those that became active only during loading. For each unit, rates at peak pressures from 1 cmH2O below to 1 cmH2O above each step were averaged to obtain the firing rate at that level of pressure. The number of units contributing to each average differs, as indicated in Table 1, because some units were lost before they were fully tested and some initially silent units showed no activity until 40 or 50 cmH2O. When inspiratory loads were applied, firing rates rose. There is a difference between the active and silent motoneurons. Motoneurons that are active during unloaded breathing show a linear increase in rate of ~3-6 spikes/s for each 10-cmH2O increase in airway pressure. Motoneurons that are silent during unloaded breathing show larger rate increases on being recruited, 11-15 spikes · s-1 · 10 cmH2O-1 of airway pressure, and they reach higher rates on average than motoneurons that are active with no load applied. When Paopeak is 40 cmH2O, the average firing rate among active motoneurons is 47 spikes/s compared with 60 spikes/s for initially silent motoneurons (P < 0.01, unpaired t-test).

Prolonged loads. When a well-isolated axon was found, it was tested with the range of brief loads and then a severe load of 1-2 cmH2O · ml-1 · s was applied and left in place. Under this loading, Paopeak rose to 40-50 cmH2O within the first few minutes and remained at that level (Fig. 2B). The integrated EMGdi was 4.2 × control at 5 min of load and rose to 5.1 × control at 30 min of load (P = 0.05, Fig. 2C). Arterial PCO2 (PaCO2) progressively increased (Fig. 2A) from 60 ± 9 Torr (mean ± SD) just before IRL to 112 ± 43 Torr at 30 min. Arterial pH fell from 7.31 ± 0.05 to 7.09 ± 0.11. PaO2 depended on the effectiveness of the supplementation with pure O2 but remained above 80 Torr (155 ± 62 Torr just before and 164 ± 105 Torr at 30 min of IRL).
Fig. 2. Arterial PCO2 (A), Paopeak (B), and peak integrated diaphragm EMG (EMGdi; C) during 30 min of severe IRL. Arterial PCO2 is in Torr, Paopeak is in cmH2O, and EMGdi is normalized so that unloaded control amplitude = 1. Values are means ± SD. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and paired t-tests with correction for multiple testing indicate that all differences from baseline are significant (P < 0.05). Change in Paopeak between 5 and 30 min is not significant. Change in EMGdi between 5 and 30 min is just significant (P = 0.05).
[View Larger Version of this Image (12K GIF file)]

Peak firing rate and Paopeak for 15-20 breaths were recorded at 5, 10, 20, and 30 min of loaded breathing. These samples showed that firing rate increased compared with the control rate found previously for the same Paopeak (Fig. 3). This effect was normalized for each motoneuron by dividing its firing rate at 5, 10, 20, and 30 min of load by its control rate for the same Paopeak (obtained from brief loads). There was a progressive increase in this ratio up to the end of the 30-min loaded interval, when rates averaged 15% greater than control (Fig. 4, P < 0.001, one-way repeated-measures ANOVA). Thirteen motoneurons were followed for 30 min of severe IRL. Of these, 10 had been active and three had been silent during unloaded breathing. For the three silent units, the increase in firing rate at 30 min of severe IRL was 7, 14, and 35%, within the same range, 6-39%, found for the 10 active units. Of the 13 phrenic motoneurons followed for 30 min of loaded breathing, none showed a decrease in firing rate relative to Paopeak.
Fig. 3. Peak firing rates and Paopeak for inspirations during a prolonged IRL. Each symbol represents 1 breath. bullet , Brief load control and same motoneuron during prolonged loading (square , 10-min IRL; triangle , 30-min IRL).
[View Larger Version of this Image (16K GIF file)]


Fig. 4. Increase in firing rate during prolonged loads. Average of ratio of firing rate during prolonged load compared with that during brief load at equal Paopeak for 13 phrenic motoneurons at 5, 10, 20, and 30 min of severe IRL; values are means ± SE. One-way repeated-measures ANOVA indicates that there is a change over time at P < 0.001.
[View Larger Version of this Image (15K GIF file)]

Motoneurons were retested with brief loads after an unloaded recovery interval of 20 min. Although PaCO2 returned to control levels (see Fig. 2), an elevation in firing rate with respect to inspiratory pressure often persisted (Fig. 5A). This residual change in rate vs. pressure was largest at the highest pressures. In contrast, the relation between Paopeak and peak transdiaphragmatic pressure was unchanged after the 30-min load (Fig. 5B), which indicates that Pao and Pdi are not differently affected by IRL and that, therefore, no important information was lost in those experiments that recorded only Pao.

In 14 rabbits, it was possible to test a phrenic motoneuron with brief loads both before and after severe IRL lasting 20-35 min. In 10 (7 active, 3 silent) of the 14 cases, firing rates remained significantly elevated after recovery from the load, as shown in Fig. 5A (one-way ANOVA of mean rate, P < 0.01). In the other four cases (2 active, 2 silent) the rate vs. pressure relation obtained after the prolonged load was close to the control, even though all four motoneurons had shown higher rates than control, by 6-10%, at the end of the prolonged load. No phrenic motoneuron fired at less than the control rate for a given Paopeak when retested with brief loads after a prolonged severe load. There was no detectable change in the recruitment threshold of silent motoneurons after prolonged IRL.

In eight experiments, reliable Pdi swings were recorded before and after 30 min of severe IRL. Of these, four motoneurons were the active type, and after the prolonged load they all showed elevated firing rates for brief loads very similar to the data for Paopeak shown in Fig. 5A. The other four silent units had Pdi recruitment thresholds from 15 to 30 cmH2O. Firing rates in two of these were elevated after prolonged IRL, whereas in the other two there was no change in peak firing rate vs. peak Pdi when retested with brief loads.

Firing patterns. Typical firing patterns are shown in Fig. 6A for active and silent motoneurons. For motoneurons active during unloaded breathing, there was usually a small initial increase in rate and then a plateau or even a decrease in rate toward the end of inspiration. A few motoneurons showed a decreasing rate throughout inspiration. During a brief severe load, several changes in the firing pattern were seen: firing began sooner and lasted longer, firing rate was higher, the rate became more variable toward the end of inspiration, and the first spike interval was shortened (arrow in Fig. 6A). Slightly shortened initial intervals were occasionally seen during unloaded breathing, but they were more common when inspiratory effort increased under load. Very short initial intervals of <10 ms (doublets) were seen in 4 of 34 motoneurons that were active during unloaded breathing and the activity of which was recorded by the computer. Doublets persisted during loaded breathing, but their incidence did not increase.
Fig. 6. A: firing rate profiles of 2 phrenic motoneurons during inspiration. First motoneuron was active during unloaded breathing (x) and showed increased activity during brief IRL (Pao 40 cmH2O, black-triangle). Each plot superimposes 6 breaths. Arrow, short initial spike interval when drive is high. Second motoneuron (square ) was initially silent, was recruited at a Pao of 17 cmH2O, and activity shown here is from 3 breaths during brief IRL (Pao 45 cmH2O). Instantaneous rate is reciprocal of interspike interval. B: same motoneurons as in 6A. Peak firing rate vs. Paopeak as inspiratory effort increases during brief loads. Motoneuron that was active during unloaded breathing (black-triangle) shows more gradual increase in rate than does motoneuron recruited at 17 cmH2O (square ).
[View Larger Version of this Image (27K GIF file)]

Phrenic motoneurons that were not active until recruited by inspiratory loads showed steep rate increases at the onset of activity and then a plateau or a rate decline toward the end of inspiration (Fig. 6A). No shortened initial intervals or doublets were seen in this group of motoneurons.

The firing-rate profiles of active and silent motoneurons during individual inspirations resembled their responses to increasing central drive during brief IRL (Fig. 6, A vs. B, and Table 1). Motoneurons that were silent initially, although recruited later with respect to either time or pressure, achieved higher rates of firing than did initially active motoneurons.


DISCUSSION

Previous results (29) have been confirmed and extended. Nearly all phrenic motoneurons are recruited by IRL. There are phrenic motoneurons that are not active during unloaded quiet breathing but do fire at high rates during loaded breathing. These initially silent motoneurons fire relatively late in the inspiratory phase, at up to 70% of TI when they are first recruited, but they then fire at progressively earlier times as inspiratory effort increases. Firing rates in initially silent motoneurons increase more rapidly than in motoneurons that are active during unloaded breathing. Motoneurons that are active during unloaded breathing fire early, usually within the first 20% of TI. Among these active motoneurons, we did not find a bimodal distribution of onset times as has been described in the cat (9, 16). Approximately two-thirds of diaphragm motor units were active during quiet unloaded breathing. Both onset times and the proportion of motor units active during unloaded breathing could have been affected by two potentially depressant influences on respiratory drive that were present in our experiments: anesthesia and laparotomy (28). However, although these effects could be significant during unloaded breathing, they did not prevent a high level of recruitment or high firing rates during IRL.

Phrenic motoneuron firing rates, along with our previous results, now strongly suggest that during IRL peripheral fatigue occurs, but drive to the diaphragm remains high. A similar finding has been reported for decerebrate cats, in which integrated phrenic activity and phrenic motoneuron firing rates remained high even when Pdi declined during severe IRL (17). In these cats, there was greater phrenic motor activity during IRL than during CO2 rebreathing, when compared at equal values of end-tidal CO2, suggesting to Iscoe (17) that there was a source of respiratory drive in addition to high PaCO2, for example from afferents in the lungs or respiratory muscles. A twitch-interpolation study also suggests that diaphragm contractions are submaximal during CO2 rebreathing (8).

In the present study, phrenic motoneuron firing rates increased relative to Paopeak and to Pdi during prolonged severe IRL (Fig. 3). An increase in firing rate during prolonged IRL, without the increase in pressure found during a prior brief IRL, implies that force-generating capacity has been lost. Further evidence of fatigue was seen when phrenic motoneurons were retested with brief loads after 20 min of recovery from a prolonged load (Fig. 4). Increases in firing rate relative to Paopeak often remained at 20 min postload, at a time when blood-gas values had returned to baseline. Increases were greatest at the highest inspiratory pressures, as would be expected, since fatigue should be greatest at high force levels where large fatiguable motor units make their greatest contribution to overall force generation (12).

Increased motoneuron firing rates were not the only indication of diaphragmatic fatigue during prolonged severe IRL. Although statistical significance was borderline (P = 0.05), the peak of the integrated EMGdi tended to increase (by 20% between 5 and 30 min of IRL), whereas the average Paopeak showed no change (see Fig 2). Osborne and Road (26) and Watchko et al. (30) also reported an increase in the EMGdi during IRL, although again the null hypothesis could not be rejected. Motoneuron firing rates may be less subject to variable recording conditions than EMGs, and this may explain their more definitive demonstration of fatigue. Evidence for a similar degree of peripheral diaphragmatic fatigue has also been found in force-frequency curves from rabbits and piglets undergoing IRL (23, 31), but electrical stimulation may differ in some ways from natural drive, as discussed below.

In studying phrenic motoneuron firing rates and Paopeak, we are looking at both a whole muscle and at individual motor units within it. When firing rates rise without a corresponding rise in Paopeak or Pdi, we can assume that fatigue has occurred in some muscle fibers, but not necessarily those innervated by the motoneuron we are recording from, because increases in central drive probably affect all motoneurons in the motor pool. Intracellular recordings from phrenic motoneurons indicate that they all receive a similar profile of excitation from descending inputs during inspiration (1). If so, an increase in central drive would be felt by all phrenic motoneurons and would promote increased firing rates in all, both those innervating fatigue-resistant as well as fatigable motor units.

Previous studies of motor-unit firing rates during sustained contractions have usually not differentiated between motor-unit types. There is some evidence that during sustained maximal voluntary contractions rate declines are more pronounced in high-threshold than in low-threshold motor units (15). This is consistent with our observation of larger rate increases in high-threshold (silent) phrenic motoneurons during brief IRL (Table 1) because rate decreases should therefore be greater when drive is decreased. However, during prolonged IRL, we saw only rate increases. Our sample is too small to determine whether high- and low-threshold phrenic motor units differed in the size of the increase. Variability in respiratory muscle endurance or in anesthetic level from rabbit to rabbit could obscure any such difference between motor unit types.

Although the diaphragm can be fatigued by IRL, the extent of the fatigue seems minor compared with the loss of force seen when motor units are driven with electrical stimulation. When Fournier and Sieck (12) used electrical stimulation to test diaphragmatic motor units in the cat by using the Burke protocol (6), the fast-twitch motor units lost more than one-half of their force-generating capacity in 2 min. These fast-twitch units are the large fibers that should contribute much of the force in the diaphragm during severe IRL. We have shown in rabbits undergoing IRL that most phrenic motoneurons, and in particular the high-threshold motoneurons presumed to be fatiguable, fire at rates that exceed the Burke protocol (40 Hz). How can IRL be tolerated for hours (26) when electrical stimulation leads to substantial loss of force in minutes?

A variety of mechanisms probably promotes better endurance under natural drive than occurs during electrical stimulation. These mechanisms may include adjustments in local blood flow and energy metabolism, recruitment of accessory muscles, and changes in the precontraction length of the diaphragm. The parasternal intercostals assist inspiration, and EMG recordings from these muscles indicate a degree and time-course of activation that closely resembles that of the diaphragm (25). Abdominal muscles recruited during IRL facilitate expiration, which can stretch the diaphragm to a portion of its length-tension curve more favorable for force production. A recent study found that this last factor can be large enough to mask substantial fatigue (23). In piglets, diaphragm force-frequency curves taken after 1 h of IRL were not different from baseline until they were corrected for decreased end-expiratory lung volume. After correction, diaphragmatic force generation was found to have dropped by 20% at all stimulation frequencies. In the present study, we saw evidence of fatigue without taking end-expiratory lung volume into account, but, if such a factor were present during prolonged but not brief IRL, it would cause phrenic motoneuron firing rates to underestimate the true extent of diaphragmatic fatigue. This may account in part for the discrepancy between the well-maintained inspiratory pressures seen during IRL and the rapid fatigue produced by electrical stimulation.

Another difference between IRL and the Burke protocol (6) is the artificial regularity of electrical stimulation. When trains of constant-rate electric shocks are altered to include two short initial intervals, fatiguability is reduced significantly (2). Normal variability in motoneuron interspike intervals may enhance the fatigue resistance of muscles operating under natural drive. During sustained voluntary contractions, motor-unit spike intervals become less regular, even when the average rate is steady (24), and it is possible that this is an adaptive response that helps to mitigate fatigue. Interval statistics were not a part of our study, but variability was examined in one phrenic motoneuron. The mean ± SD values of the spike interval were derived during the middle one-third of inspiration, when rate had reached a plateau. During severe IRL, the coefficient of variation of the spike interval increased from 0.11 to 0.13, even though the mean interval declined from 15 to 13 ms. For comparison, the coefficient of variation of spike intervals increased from 0.34 to 0.38 at a mean interval of 100 ms in human masseter motor units during 15 min of steady activation, a change that was found to be statistically significant (24). The functional significance and cause of changes in discharge regularity are unsettled issues.

The functional significance of very short initial intervals, or doublets, is also problematic. Doublets can increase force in motor units (2, 7), but they were not seen in our high-threshold phrenic motoneurons, the force production and fatigability of which are likely to be especially important during IRL, and they were rare in lower threshold phrenic motoneurons and did not become more common when respiratory drive increased. When muscle has been previously activated at high rates, as is likely to be the case in IRL, the force-enhancing effect of doublets is greatly diminished (7).

As illustrated by doublets, even though all motoneurons in the phrenic pool may receive a common descending input, they can respond to it differently. Only some motoneurons are active during unloaded breathing, and there is a substantial range of recruitment thresholds among those that fire only at higher levels of inspiratory effort. In the phrenic motor nucleus, recruitment thresholds have been correlated with input resistance and cell size, showing that small cells are depolarized further by a given synaptic current (19), as the Size Principle predicts. Our results show that, once they are above the recruitment threshold, phrenic motoneurons continue to differ in their response to increasing drive, but in a fashion not explained by the Size Principle. Phrenic motoneurons that were silent during unloaded breathing showed steeper rate increases, once recruited, both during an individual inspiration and during progressive IRL, than did motoneurons that were active during quiet breathing (see Fig. 6). This finding may be analogous to previous reports that late-onset phrenic motoneurons show greater increases in rate than early-onset motoneurons (16, 18).

Above the depolarization threshold for spike generation, the firing rate of a motoneuron may be strongly dependent on the duration of its afterhyperpolarization (20). Empirically, afterhyperpolarizations are found to vary with motoneuron type in the way needed to explain higher rates in fast vs. slow motoneurons at equal levels of drive (15, 19). Theoretically, there is a need for some mechanism that can allow fast-twitch motor units to be driven at the high rates required for fusion of their brief twitches without at the same time overstimulating smaller slower motor units.

The activation of a motor pool clearly shows adaptation to the requirements of a muscle, although in some cases the mechanisms are not fully understood. During sustained maximal contractions, motor unit firing rates decline as the muscle fatigues and the twitch durations of muscle fibers increase (4). It has been hypothesized that this decline in firing rate, which can still elicit the maximum force available because of the slower relaxation rate and greater fusion of twitches in fatigued muscle, may be a beneficial economy, a concept known as muscle wisdom (22). Alternatively, there would be nothing to be gained from increased firing rates because, during a maximal contraction, there would be no reserve capacity for generating force. The case is different for submaximal contractions, in which there would be reserve force capacity, at least at the outset, so that fatigue could potentially be countered by increasing the activation of the muscle.

In our rabbits, diaphragmatic contractions were probably submaximal during the 30-min IRL protocol. Peak Pao values of 40-50 cmH2O were generated, whereas in the same preparation higher pressures can be maintained longer before respiratory failure occurs (26), and phrenic stimulation at 80 Hz produces a Pdi of 66 ± 7 cmH2O (31), which suggests that our prolonged IRL elicited 60-70% of maximal Pdi.

Previous single-unit work on fatiguing muscle has been done in awake human subjects. In these studies, there are declines in motor unit firing rates during sustained maximal contractions (14, 22), but for submaximal contractions a variety of results have been reported: increases, decreases, and no change in rate (3, 13, 24). Several factors might contribute to differences between our work and these studies. 1) The muscles studied in humans [for example, quadriceps (3), biceps brachii (13), and masseter (24)] have a variety of functions quite different from those of the diaphragm. 2) In anesthetized rabbits, a central pattern generator rather than conscious effort provides the drive to motoneurons. 3) In the case of the diaphragm, any monitoring of the force being produced is internal, whereas human subjects are usually given an external source of feedback to follow. 4) Diaphragm contractions are intermittent and last only seconds, whereas in human studies a constant force is maintained for many minutes. 5) The diaphragm must work continuously and may be better adapted for sustained activity than most skeletal muscles. 6) The diaphragm has comparatively few muscle spindles, and its sensory response to loading probably differs from that of other skeletal muscles.

We saw only increases in diaphragm motor unit firing rates during prolonged severe IRL. During loaded breathing, the need to maintain force and limit increases in PCO2 may override whatever mechanism leads to lower firing rates in some other situations.


FOOTNOTES

Address for reprint requests: J. D. Road, Div. of Respiratory Medicine, Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre, 2775 Heather St., Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 3J5.

Received 25 October 1996; accepted in final form 7 May 1997.


REFERENCES

1. Berger, A. J. Phrenic motoneurons in the cat: subpopulations and the nature of respiratory drive potentials. J. Neurophysiol. 42: 76-90, 1979[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2. Bevan, L., Y. Laouris, R. M. Reinking, and D. G. Stuart. The effect of the stimulation pattern on the fatigue of single motor units in adult cats. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 449: 85-108, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3. Bigland-Ritchie, B. R., E. Cafarelli, and N. K. Vøllestad. Fatigue of submaximal static contractions. Acta Physiol. Scand. 128, Suppl. 556: 137-148, 1986.
4. Bigland-Ritchie, B., R. Johansson, O. C. J. Lippold, and J. J. Woods. Contractile speed and EMG changes during fatigue of sustained maximal voluntary contractions. J. Neurophysiol. 50: 313-324, 1983[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5. Borg, J., L. Grimby, and J. Hannerz. The fatigue of voluntary contraction and the peripheral electrical propagation of single motor units in man. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 340: 435-444, 1983[Abstract/Free Full Text].
6. Burke, R. E. Firing patterns of gastrocnemius motor units in the decerebrate cat. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 196: 631-654, 1968[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7. Burke, R. E., P. Rudomin, and F. E. Zajac III. The effect of activation history on tension production by individual muscle units. Brain Res. 109: 515-529, 1976[Medline].
8. Dick, T. E., and S. G. Kelsen. Relationship between diaphragmatic activation and twitch tension to superimposed electrical stimulation in the cat. Respir. Physiol. 76: 337-346, 1989[Medline].
9. Dick, T. E., F.-J. Kong, and A. J. Berger. Correlation of recruitment order with axonal conduction velocity for supraspinally driven diaphragmatic motor units. J. Neurophysiol. 57: 245-259, 1987[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10. Eastwood, P. E., D. R. Hillman, and K. E. Finucane. Ventilatory responses to inspiratory threshold loading and role of muscle fatigue in task failure. J. Appl. Physiol. 76: 185-195, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11. Ferguson, G. T., C. G. Irvin, and P. M. Cherniack. Relationship of diaphragm glycogen, lactate, and function to respiratory failure. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 141: 926-932, 1990[Medline].
12. Fournier, M., and G. C. Sieck. Mechanical properties of muscle units in the cat diaphragm. J. Neurophysiol. 59: 1055-1066, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].
13. Garland, S. J., R. M. Enoka, L. P. Serrano, and G. A. Robinson. Behavior of motor units in human biceps brachii during a submaximal fatiguing contraction. J. Appl. Physiol. 76: 2411-2419, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].
14. Grimby, L., J. Hannerz, and B. Hedman. The fatigue and voluntary discharge properties of single motor units in man. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 316: 545-554, 1981[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15. Hammarberg, C., and J.-O. Kellerth. Studies of some twitch and fatigue properties of different motor unit types in the ankle muscles of the adult cat. Acta Physiol. Scand. 95: 231-242, 1975[Medline].
16. Hilaire, G., R. Monteau, and M. Dussardier. Modalités du recrutement des motoneurones phréniques. J. Physiol. Paris 64: 457-478, 1972[Medline].
17. Iscoe, S. Phrenic motoneuron discharge during sustained inspiratory resistive loading. J. Appl. Physiol. 81: 2260-2266, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18. Iscoe, S., J. Dankoff, R. Migicovsky, and C. Polosa. Recruitment and discharge frequency of phrenic motoneurones during inspiration. Respir. Physiol. 26: 113-128, 1976[Medline].
19. Jodkowski, J. S., F. Viana, T. E. Dick, and A. J. Berger. Repetitive firing properties of phrenic motoneurons in the cat. J. Neurophysiol. 60: 687-702, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].
20. Kernell, D. The repetitive impulse discharge of a simple neurone model compared with that of spinal motoneurones. Brain Res. 11: 685-687, 1968[Medline].
21. Kirkwood, P. A., and J. B. Munson. The incidence of initial doublets in the discharges of motoneurones of two different inspiratory muscles in the cat. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 493: 577-587, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].
22. Marsden, C. D., J. C. Meadows, and P. A. Merton. "Muscular wisdom" that minimizes fatigue during prolonged effort in man: peak rates of motoneuron discharge and slowing of discharge during fatigue. In: Motor Control Mechanisms in Health and Disease, edited by J. E. Desmedt. New York: Raven, 1983, p. 169-211.
23. Mayock, D. E., T. A. Standaert, T. D. Murphy, and D. E. Woodrum. Diaphragmatic force and substrate response to resistive loaded breathing in the piglet. J. Appl. Physiol. 70: 70-76, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].
24. Nordstrom, M. A., and T. S. Miles. Instability of motor unit firing rates during prolonged isometric contractions in human masseter. Brain Res. 549: 268-274, 1991[Medline].
25. Osborne, S. Respiratory muscle activity and task failure during severe inspiratory resistive loading. In: The Role of the Diaphragm in Task Failure During Inspiratory Resistive Loading in the Rabbit (PhD thesis). Vancouver, BC: Univ. of British Columbia, 1994, chapt. 4, p. 117-145 and Fig. 19.
26. Osborne, S., and J. D. Road. Diaphragm and phrenic nerve activities during inspiratory loading in anesthetized rabbits. Respir. Physiol. 99: 321-330, 1995[Medline].
27. Road, J. D. Phrenic afferents and ventilatory control. Lung 168: 137-149, 1990[Medline].
28. Road, J. D., K. R. Burgess, W. A. Whitelaw, and G. T. Ford. Diaphragm function and respiratory response after upper abdominal surgery in dogs. J. Appl. Physiol. 57: 576-582, 1984[Abstract/Free Full Text].
29. Road, J. D., S. Osborne, and A. Cairns. Phrenic motoneuron firing rates during brief inspiratory resistive loads. J. Appl. Physiol. 79: 1540-1545, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].
30. Watchko, J. F., T. A. Standaert, D. E. Mayock, G. Twiggs, and D. E. Woodrum. Ventilatory failure during loaded breathing: the role of central neural drive. J. Appl. Physiol. 65: 249-255, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].
31. Xiang, T.-X., J. D. Road, and P. G. Wilcox. Effect of the beta-agonist clenbuterol on dexamethasone-induced diaphragm dysfunction in rabbits. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 154: 1778-1783, 1996[Abstract].

0161-7567/97 $5.00 Copyright © 1997 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
J. A. Simpson, J. Van Eyk, and S. Iscoe
Respiratory muscle injury, fatigue and serum skeletal troponin I in rat
J. Physiol., February 1, 2004; 554(3): 891 - 903.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. McGuire, M. MacDermott, and A. Bradford
Effects of Chronic Intermittent Asphyxia on Rat Diaphragm and Limb Muscle Contractility
Chest, March 1, 2003; 123(3): 875 - 881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
J E Butler, D K McKenzie, and S C Gandevia
Discharge properties and recruitment of human diaphragmatic motor units during voluntary inspiratory tasks
J. Physiol., August 1, 1999; 518(3): 907 - 920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Road, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Cairns, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Road, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Cairns, A. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online