Journal of Applied Physiology AJP: Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 83: 608-614, 1997;
8750-7587/97 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ramires, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Negrão, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ramires, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Negrão, C. E.

Journal of Applied Physiology
Vol. 83, No. 2, pp. 608-614, August 1997
METABOLISM

Oral glucose ingestion increases endurance capacity in normal and diabetic (type I) humans

P. R. Ramires, C. L. M. Forjaz, C. M. C. Strunz, M. E. R. Silva, J. Diament, W. Nicolau, B. Liberman, and C. E. Negrão

Physical Education School, Endocrinology Unit, and Heart Institute, University of São Paulo 05508-900; and Brigadeiro Hospital, São Paulo 01401-901, Brazil

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Ramires, P. R., C. L. M. Forjaz, C. M. C. Strunz, M. E. R. Silva, J. Diament, W. Nicolau, B. Liberman, and C. E. Negrão. Oral glucose ingestion increases endurance capacity in normal and diabetic (type I) humans. J. Appl. Physiol. 83(2): 608-614, 1997.---The effects of an oral glucose administration (1 g/kg) 30 min before exercise on endurance capacity and metabolic responses were studied in 21 type I diabetic patients [insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM)] and 23 normal controls (Con). Cycle ergometer exercise (55-60% of maximal O2 uptake) was performed until exhaustion. Glucose administration significantly increased endurance capacity in Con (112 ± 7 vs. 125 ± 6 min, P < 0.05) but only in IDDM patients whose blood glucose decreased during exercise (70.8 ± 8.2 vs. 82.8 ± 9.4 min, P < 0.05). Hyperglycemia was normalized at 15 min of exercise in Con (7.4 ± 0.2 vs. 4.8 ± 0.2 mM) but not in IDDM patients (12.4 ± 0.7 vs. 15.6 ± 0.9 mM). In Con, insulin and C-peptide levels were normalized during exercise. Glucose administration decreased growth hormone levels in both groups. In conclusion, oral glucose ingestion 30 min before exercise increases endurance capacity in Con and in some IDDM patients. In IDDM patients, in contrast with Con, exercise to exhaustion attenuates hyperglycemia but does not bring blood glucose levels to preglucose levels.

exercise; substrates; hormones; insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus


INTRODUCTION

THE METABOLIC EFFECT of preexercise glucose administration has been studied in healthy subjects. Despite the described negative effects of glucose-induced hyperinsulinemia and depressed free fatty acids (FFA) levels during high-intensity exercise on endurance capacity (11, 13, 16), some investigators have reported that glucose load before exercise does not affect exercise time to exhaustion in healthy subjects (10, 14). Indeed, glucose represents an exogenous energy source in subsequent prolonged exercise (1) and improves exercise tolerance (12). However, the effect of glucose load before prolonged exercise to exhaustion on substrate-hormonal response and on endurance capacity in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) has not been described.

Despite abnormal substrate utilization during exercise in diabetic patients (5, 18, 26, 31, 33, 34), both the hyperglycemia, provoked by glucose administration, and the enhancement in muscle blood flow, caused by the increase and distribution of cardiac output during exercise, may favor muscle glucose uptake and oxidation and, consequently, improve endurance capacity in these patients. In a recent study (25), we observed that dynamic leg exercise tolerance was significantly lower in IDDM patients with no insulin administration 12 h before exercise compared with healthy subjects. Nonetheless, we found that prolonged moderate-intensity exercise significantly decreased blood glucose in IDDM patients.

Physiological changes that take place in healthy subjects before and at the onset of exercise after glucose administration may not be promptly operative in IDDM patients and may explain some metabolic differences between healthy and IDDM subjects. Therefore, increased understanding of the effect of glucose administration on substrate-hormonal response and endurance capacity in young IDDM patients has clinical implications and should be studied.

We hypothesized that preexercise glucose administration would improve muscle glucose uptake and oxidation, reduce muscle glycogen utilization during exercise, and, consequently, increase endurance capacity in normal controls and in well-controlled IDDM patients.

In the present study, we investigated the effect of oral glucose ingestion 30 min before moderate cycle exercise to exhaustion on the metabolic and hormonal responses, as well as on endurance capacity, in normal controls and IDDM patients from whom insulin was withheld 12 h before exercise.


METHODS

Subjects. After giving their written consent, 21 patients with IDDM and 23 normal controls with normal oral glucose tolerance (23) were investigated. In the IDDM patients, the diabetic condition had been present from 3 to 5 yr, but no clinical diabetic complication had been noted. Their glycosylated hemoglobin level was <12% on two daily doses of neutral protamine Hagedorn porcine insulin. None were athletes, and their physical and functional characteristics are presented in Table 1.

Table  1.   Physical and functional characteristics of IDDM patients and normal controls
Diabetic (n = 21) Control (n = 23)

Age, yr 23 ± 1.0  23 ± 0.5 
Weight, kg 66 ± 1.9  68 ± 1.6 
Height, cm 172 ± 1.6  176 ± 1.3 
Body mass index, kg/m2 22 ± 0.5  22 ± 0.4 
Maximal heart rate, beats/min 187 ± 3  187 ± 2 
Maximal systolic blood pressure, mmHg 201 ± 5  194 ± 4 
Maximal workload, W 196 ± 8  208 ± 5 
 VO2 max, ml · kg-1 · min-1 39 ± 1.2  40 ± 0.8

Values are means ± SE; n, no. of subjects. IDDM, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus; VO2 max, maximal O2 uptake.

All subjects were asked to have similar food intake and to avoid any physical activity 24 h before each test day. The normal control subjects were on a free-choice diet, whereas the IDDM patients were monitored on an outpatient basis on a weight-maintaining diet containing ~50% of total calories as carbohydrate, 15-20% as protein, and 30% as fat.

Maximal exercise testing. Values of maximal heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and oxygen uptake (VO2 max) were determined at the maximal workload achieved during a maximal exercise test on an electrically braked cycle ergometer (Standart Lannoy Ergometer, Godart-Statham, Bilthoven, Holland) with 50-W increments every 3 min until the subjects reached exhaustion (Table 1).

Exercise tolerance protocol. All subjects were studied in the morning after an overnight fast (12 h), and insulin was withheld 12 h before the test in the IDDM patients. The studies were carried out on 2 different days, with 7 days intervening. All subjects performed two bouts of moderate leg exercise to exhaustion (55-60% of VO2 max) on an electrically braked cycle ergometer. Oral glucose (Dextrosol, 1 g/kg) or placebo (saccharine) solutions were randomly administered in a double-blind fashion 30 min before exercise. In the normal control group, 13 subjects performed exercise with placebo first and 10 with glucose first. In the IDDM group, 10 patients took placebo first and 11 took glucose first.

Ninety minutes before exercise (-90 min), a catheter for blood sampling was placed in the forearm vein of subjects resting in supine position. As shown in Fig. 1, blood samples were obtained at preingestion fasting (-30 min); at postingestion resting (0 min); at 15, 30, and 60 min of exercise; and at exhaustion. Exhaustion was defined as the time when the subject could no longer maintain 60 revolutions/min pedaling for 10 s. Heart rate, blood pressure, and expired air samples were obtained simultaneously with blood samples.
Fig. 1. Exercise tolerance protocol. down-triangle, Glucose or placebo ingestion; *, blood samples; EX, exercise to exhaustion.
[View Larger Version of this Image (6K GIF file)]

The mean exercise workload performed during exercise tolerance test was 95 ± 3 and 99 ± 2 W for the IDDM patients and normal controls, respectively, and corresponded to 58 ± 2 and 57 ± 2% of the VO2 max.

Cardiovascular and respiratory analyses. Samples of expired air collected in meteorological balloons during the exercise tolerance protocol were analyzed for O2 and CO2 fractions by Scholander microtechnique (29) (Godart-Statham). Minute ventilation was measured by Tissot spirometer (Godart-Statham) and rates of oxygen consumption (VO2) and carbon dioxide output (VCO2) were calculated from these data. The respiratory exchange ratio (RER) was calculated as VO2/VCO2. Heart rate was continuously monitored by electrocardiogram (model 7830A; Hewlett-Packard, Waltham, MA), and blood pressure was measured by a sphygmomanometer (model 980; Oftec, São Paulo, Brazil).

Biochemical analyses. Colorimetric microdetermination was used to analyze serum FFA levels (24). Commercial enzymatic kits were used for serum glucose (Glicose; Abbott, São Paulo, Brazil) and plasma lactate (Monotest Lactato; Merck, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) analyses. Commercial radioimmunoassay kits were used for plasma glucagon (Radioassay System, Anaheim, CA), serum cortisol (Clinical Assay), C peptide (Serono, Milano, Italy), human growth hormone (GH; Pharmacia Diagnostic, Uppsala, Sweden), and insulin (Pharmacia Diagnostic). Intra-assay and interassay variation coefficients for hormone analyses were, respectively, 10 and 8% for glucagon, 3.5 and 6.0% for cortisol, 6.2 and 14.8% for C peptide, 4.3 and 7.5% for GH, and 3.6 and 7.5% for insulin.

Statistical analysis. Data were subject to three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures (Bio-Medical Data Processing, 1985, University of California, Los Angeles, CA). A Pearson correlation coefficient analysis was used to verify the relationship between the endurance capacity and the change (Delta ) of glucose levels during exercise within the IDDM patients. Scheffé's post hoc test was used to locate significant differences. P < 0.05 was accepted as being statistically significant. Data are presented as means ± SE.


RESULTS

Endurance capacity. The overall mean endurance capacity (glucose plus placebo trials) was significantly greater in the normal controls compared with the IDDM patients (118.4 ± 5.5 vs. 73.5 ± 4.6 min, respectively; P < 0.05). Glucose ingestion 30 min before exercise significantly increased the overall mean endurance capacity (101.4 ± 6.2 vs. 92.6 ± 5.7 min, all subjects given glucose vs. all subjects given placebo, respectively; P < 0.05). Post hoc analysis showed that in normal controls glucose administration compared with placebo significantly increased endurance capacity (124.7 ± 6.6 vs. 112.1 ± 7.2 min; P < 0.05) and showed a tendency toward significance in IDDM patients (75.8 ± 7.6 vs. 71.1 ± 6.5 min; P < 0.10). Further analyses of our data, comparing the metabolic profiles between placebo and glucose trials, showed that two IDDM patients had much higher resting glucose, FFA, GH, and glucagon concentrations before the glucose trial than before the placebo trial. These levels before the placebo and glucose trials were, respectively, glucose: patient A, 6.2 vs. 8.6 mM; patient B, 5.9 vs. 8.2 mM; FFA: patient A, 0.24 vs. 0.47 meq/l; patient B, 0.30 vs. 0.57 meq/l; GH: patient A, 2.3 vs. 4.7 ng/ml; patient B, 2.8 vs. 5.6 ng/ml; and glucagon: patient A, 203 vs. 512 pg/ml; patient B, 141 vs. 433 pg/ml. These data suggested that these two patients, at least, were poorly controlled during the glucose trial. Then another ANOVA was performed without those two outlier patients. We found that endurance capacity was significantly higher in normal controls compared with IDDM patients and that glucose administration significantly increased endurance capacity by 11.2% in the normal controls (P < 0.05) and by 12.4% in the IDDM patients (P < 0.05, Table 2).

Table  2.   Endurance capacity with glucose or placebo ingestion 30 min before exercise (55-60% of  VO2 max) in normal controls and in IDDM patients with insulin withheld 12 h before exercise
Group n Placebo Glucose

IDDM patients 19 68.3 ± 5.8  76.8 ± 6.3dagger
Normal controls 23 112.1 ± 7.2* 124.7 ± 6.6*, dagger

Values are means ± SE in min. * P < 0.05 vs. IDDM; dagger P < 0.05 vs. placebo.

To better understand the preexercise glucose effect on endurance capacity in the IDDM patients, a correlation analysis was performed. A significant correlation (r = -0.58, P < 0.05) between endurance capacity (in min) and Delta glucose levels (exhaustion levels minus resting levels, in mM) during exercise was observed. These data showed that, in fact, there were two subgroups of IDDM patients: 1) patients whose glucose levels decreased during exercise to exhaustion (n = 12) and 2) patients whose glucose levels did not decrease during exercise to exhaustion (n = 7). Further ANOVA between these two subgroups of IDDM patients (Table 3) showed that preexercise glucose ingestion significantly increased endurance capacity by 16.9% (P < 0.05) in the diabetic patients whose glucose levels decresed during exercise to exhaustion and did not significantly change endurance capacity [3.89%, not significant (NS)] in the diabetic patients whose glucose levels did not decrease during exercise.

Table  3.   Endurance capacity with glucose or placebo ingestion 30 min before exercise (55-60% of  VO2 max) in IDDM patients whose blood glucose decreases during exercise and in IDDM patients whose blood glucose does not decrease during exercise
Group n Placebo Glucose

IDDM with decreased blood glucose 12 70.8 ± 8.2  82.8 ± 9.4*
IDDM with no decreased blood glucose 7 64.1 ± 10.1  66.7 ± 10.4

Values are means ± SE. Insulin was withheld 12 h before exercise. * P < 0.05 vs. placebo.

RER. RER values were significantly lower at rest (0.81 ± 0.08 vs. 0.86 ± 0.05) in the IDDM patients compared with normal controls (Fig. 2). In both groups studied, the exercise-induced enhancement of RER values was significantly higher after glucose administration. In the normal controls, the RER values significantly decreased at exhaustion compared with RER values at 60 min of exercise in both glucose and placebo trials.
Fig. 2. Effect of glucose (open symbols) or placebo (solid symbols) ingestion 30 min before exercise [55-60% maximal O2 uptake (VO2 max)] on respiratory exchange ratio (RER) at rest and during exercise to exhaustion in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) patients with insulin withheld 12 h before exercise and in normal controls. Data are means ± SE. P < 0.05: * vs. control group, dagger  vs. placebo, Dagger  vs. -30 min, § vs. 0 min, # vs. 15 min of exercise, and & vs. 60 min of exercise.
[View Larger Version of this Image (16K GIF file)]

Substrates. Glucose levels were significantly higher in the IDDM patients compared with the normal controls at preglucose fasting (8.3 ± 0.7 vs. 5.1 ± 0.1 mM, respectively) and throughout the exercise (Fig. 3). Exercise to exhaustion after placebo caused no significant change in glycemia in the normal controls, but it provoked a significant decrease in glycemia (from 8.3 ± 0.7 to 6.4 ± 0.8 mM) in the IDDM patients compared with fasting values. Glucose administration significantly increased resting glycemia in both IDDM patients (from 8.3 ± 0.7 to 12.4 ± 0.7 mM) and in normal controls (from 5.1 ± 0.1 to 7.4 ± 0.2 mM). In the normal controls, glycemia had returned to fasting levels at 15 min of exercise and was maintained at a steady state until exhaustion. However, in the IDDM patients, glycemia was higher during all exercise periods compared with placebo trial. Although glycemia significantly decreased after 60 min of exercise, it was still significantly higher at exhaustion compared with fasting levels (12.1 ± 1.1 vs. 8.3 ± 0.7 mM, respectively).
Fig. 3. Effect of glucose (open symbols) or placebo (solid symbols) ingestion 30 min before exercise (55-60% VO2 max) on glucose, lactate, and free fatty acid (FFA) concentrations at rest and during exercise to exhaustion in IDDM patients with insulin withheld 12 h before exercise and in normal controls. Data are means ± SE. P < 0.05: * vs. control group, dagger  vs. placebo, Dagger  vs. -30 min, § vs. 0 min, # vs. 15 min of exercise, and & vs. 60 min of exercise.
[View Larger Version of this Image (23K GIF file)]

Fasting lactate levels and exercise-induced enhancement of lactate levels at 15 and 30 min of exercise were not significantly different between the two groups studied (Fig. 3). In the normal controls, lactate levels significantly decreased from 2.5 ± 0.2 mM at 30 min of exercise to 1.9 ± 0.1 mM at exhaustion. In the IDDM patients, lactate levels did not decrease at exhaustion and were significantly higher than in normal controls (2.8 ± 0.2 vs. 1.9 ± 0.1 mM, respectively). During all experimental procedures, glucose administration did not significantly change lactate levels in either the IDDM patients or the normal controls.

Fasting serum FFA levels were similar between the two groups studied (Fig. 3). In the normal controls, glucose administration compared with placebo trial significantly decreased FFA levels at rest (0.30 ± 0.02 vs. 0.19 ± 0.02 meq/l), at 15 min of exercise (0.35 ± 0.04 vs. 0.11 ± 0.01 meq/l), at 30 min of exercise (0.43 ± 0.04 vs. 0.13 ± 0.01 meq/l), and at 60 min of exercise (0.59 ± 0.05 vs. 0.21 ± 0.02 meq/l). Although FFA levels in the normal controls significantly increased at exhaustion when compared with 60 min of exercise (from 0.21 ± 0.02 to 0.90 ± 0.11 meq/l), these levels were still significantly lower than those in the placebo trial (1.18 ± 0.11 meq/l). In the IDDM patients, glucose administration did not significantly change FFA levels either at rest or during all exercise periods. After glucose administration, FFA levels were significantly higher at exhaustion compared with fasting (0.50 ± 0.06 vs. 0.29 ± 0.04 meq/l, respectively), but these levels were not significantly different from placebo. Indeed, in the glucose trial, FFA levels at exhaustion were significantly lower in the IDDM patients compared with normal controls (0.50 ± 0.06 vs. 0.90 ± 0.11 meq/l, respectively).

Hormones. Serum insulin levels were analyzed only in the normal controls (Fig. 4). Glucose administration significantly increased insulin levels at rest (from 10 ± 0.0 to 68 ± 8.2 µU/ml). A 15-min period of exercise significantly decreased insulin levels (to 21 ± 1.7 µU/ml) compared with postglucose resting levels (68 ± 8.2 µU/ml), but these levels were still higher than placebo levels (11 ± 1.1 µU/ml). At exhaustion, insulin levels had returned to fasting and placebo levels.
Fig. 4. Effect of glucose (open symbols) or placebo (solid symbols) ingestion 30 min before exercise (55-60% VO2 max) on insulin, C peptide, and glucagon concentrations at rest and during exercise to exhaustion in IDDM patients with insulin withheld 12 h before exercise and in normal controls. Data are means ± SE. P < 0.05: * vs. control group, dagger  vs. placebo, Dagger  vs. -30 min, § vs. 0 min, # vs. 15 min of exercise, and & vs. 60 min of exercise.
[View Larger Version of this Image (24K GIF file)]

Serum C peptide was significantly lower in the IDDM patients compared with normal controls at fasting (0.2 ± 0.04 vs. 1.3 ± 0.05 ng/ml, respectively) and during all exercise periods (Fig. 4). Neither glucose administration nor exercise had any effect on C-peptide levels in the IDDM patients. As expected, glucose administration significantly increased C-peptide levels (to 4.0 ± 0.30 ng/ml) in the resting state in the normal controls. During exercise, C-peptide levels gradually decreased, and at exhaustion they returned to placebo levels.

Plasma glucagon levels were significantly higher in the IDDM patients compared with normal controls at fasting (264 ± 38 vs. 115 ± 15 pg/ml) and during all exercise periods (Fig. 4). In the normal controls, glucagon levels significantly increased (to 171 ± 14 pg/ml) at exhaustion compared with fasting, and glucose administration did not change glucagon levels during exercise. In the IDDM patients, glucagon levels were significantly higher during all experiments in the glucose trial, and the exercise-induced enhancement of glucagon levels was similar in both glucose and placebo trials.

Fasting serum cortisol levels were similar between the two groups studied (Fig. 5). Cortisol levels significantly increased at exhaustion compared with fasting in both the IDDM patients (19 ± 1.7 vs. 13 ± 1.1 µg/dl, respectively) and normal controls (20 ± 1.7 vs. 12 ± 1.0 µg/dl, respectively). Glucose administration had no significant effect in the exercise-induced enhancement of cortisol in both groups.
Fig. 5. Effect of glucose (open symbols) or placebo (solid symbols) ingestion 30 min before exercise (55-60% VO2 max) on cortisol and growth hormone (GH) concentrations at rest and during exercise to exhaustion in IDDM patients with insulin withheld 12 h before exercise and in normal controls. Data are means ± SE. P < 0.05: * vs. control group, dagger  vs. placebo, Dagger  vs. -30 min, § vs. 0 min, and # vs. 15 min of exercise.
[View Larger Version of this Image (26K GIF file)]

Fasting serum GH levels were not significantly different between the two groups studied (Fig. 5). A 30-min period of exercise significantly increased GH levels in both the IDDM patients (from 3 ± 0.6 to 8 ± 1.7 ng/ml) and normal controls (from 2 ± 0.5 to 12 ± 3.0 ng/ml). Glucose administration significantly inhibited the exercise-induced enhancement of GH levels when compared with placebo, and these levels were significantly lower in the IDDM patients compared with the normal controls at 60 min of exercise (13 ± 2.3 vs. 20 ± 4.6 ng/ml, respectively) and at exhaustion (12 ± 2.2 vs. 22 ± 4.5 ng/ml, respectively).


DISCUSSION

There are three main findings of the present investigation. 1) Preexercise glucose administration significantly increases endurance capacity in normal controls. 2) Preexercise glucose administration significantly increases endurance capacity in a subgroup of IDDM patients whose blood glucose levels decrease during exercise. 3) Cycle ergometer exercise for 15 min normalizes glycemia levels after glucose load in normal controls but not in IDDM patients, whose blood glucose levels are still increased at exhaustion.

Glucose administration increased C-peptide levels only in the normal controls, showing that our IDDM patients were, in fact, in the diabetic state. Furthermore, withholding of insulin 12 h before exercise excluded a hyperinsulinemic state before and during exercise in diabetic patients. Indeed, the glycosylated hemoglobin levels <12%, the absence of ketosis, the similarity of FFA and GH levels at resting state, and the similarity of cortisol and GH responses during exercise between IDDM patients and normal controls demonstrated that our IDDM patients were well controlled and had a normal counterregulatory response to moderate exercise (3).

We hypothesized that preexercise glucose administration, by improving muscle glucose uptake and oxidation and also by reducing muscle glycogen utilization during exercise, would increase endurance capacity in normal controls and in well-controlled IDDM patients. Actually, preexercise glucose administration did increase endurance capacity in normal controls and in IDDM patients. However, the increase in endurance capacity was only observed in IDDM patients whose glucose levels decreased during exercise.

Some investigators (11, 13, 16) have reported a negative effect of hyperinsulinemia after glucose loading 30-45 min before high-intensity prolonged exercise in healthy subjects because hyperinsulinemia provokes early hypoglycemia, increases muscle glycogen utilization, and reduces endurance performance. On the contrary, and in agreement with other investigators (10, 12, 14), our results did not show any hypoglycemic state during all the exercise periods in normal controls. Moreover, endurance capacity was increased by 11.2% in normal controls. Chryssanthopoulos et al. (10) showed that glucose load 30 min before intense running exercise (70% of VO2 max) did not reduce endurance performance in recreational runners. Devlin et al. (12) found that ingestion of a mixed macronutrient snack (43 g glucose, 9 g fat, and 3 g protein) significantly increased plasma glucose and insulin concentrations before exercise but did not reduce endurance performance or increase muscle glycogen depletion during high-intensity cycle exercise (70% of VO2 max) in untrained healthy humans.

Increased FFA levels, decreased lactate levels, and decreased RER values as exercise was prolonged to exhaustion are indicative of decreased muscle glycolysis (27) and increased hepatic lactate uptake (2, 34). These metabolic adaptations that take place at the latter stage of prolonged exercise in the present study show a shift from carbohydrate to lipid metabolism as muscle energy supply and may explain, in part, the benefit of preexercise glucose administration on endurance capacity in healthy humans performing a moderate-intensity dynamic exercise.

It has been suggested that exogenous carbohydrate load during prolonged cycle exercise (70% of VO2 max) increases work capacity by attenuating the muscle glycogen-depletion rate and reversing the decrease in hexose monophosphate and tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates in skeletal muscle supplied with blood glucose in the latter stage of exercise (30). Indeed, by increasing muscle glucose uptake and oxidation (1, 17), the described synergistic effect of higher glucose and insulin levels at the onset of exercise seems to compensate for the decreased FFA oxidation during exercise in normal controls.

The increased endurance capacity after glucose ingestion in the IDDM patients whose blood glucose levels decreased during exercise has physiological implications. First, this longer period of exercise requires an increase of 7,500 ml in oxygen consumption or an increase of 37.3 kcal in caloric expenditure in IDDM patients. Second, this additional increase in metabolic rate is provided, at least in part, by blood glucose metabolism, because blood glucose levels were reduced in those IDDM patients who showed a significant increase in endurance capacity.

The present study does not clarify the mechanisms underlying the increase in endurance capacity in IDDM patients after preexercise glucose administration. Nonetheless, the physiological adaptations that take place during exercise give us some insights into this issue. The enhancement of cardiac output and, consequently, the increased muscle blood flow may favor muscle glucose uptake during exercise. Indeed, the increase in glucose mass action on the muscle membrane, in concert with a more sensitive receptor, may improve muscle glucose uptake during prolonged exercise even in IDDM patients.

Interestingly, however, endurance capacity did not increase in all diabetic patients studied. In fact, our data showed that there are two subgroups of IDDM patients: 1) those in whom preexercise glucose ingestion significantly increased endurance capacity and 2) those in whom preexercise glucose ingestion did not increase endurance capacity. The different responses to exercise between these two groups is not clear, but it is a very interesting topic for future studies.

In the normal controls, hyperglycemia was normalized after a short 15-min exercise period. On the other hand, in the IDDM patients, blood glucose levels significantly decreased only at latter stages of exercise, and this reduction was not sufficient to bring blood glucose levels to preglucose-ingestion levels. In IDDM patients, the related exercise effects of increasing leg glucose uptake (34) and decreasing glycemia (25) seem to be quite limited compared with the effects in healthy subjects, and, according to our data, differ even among between well-controlled IDDM patients. The limited muscle blood flow (21), the decreased pyruvate dehydrogenase activity (4, 6, 15, 20, 22) and the increased lactate dehydrogenase activity in diabetic subjects (28) may have predisposed our IDDM patients to a greater anaerobic metabolism (increased lactate production) and, consequently, early fatigue. Despite the augmented hepatic gluconeogenesis rate in diabetic subjects (32), the lower endurance capacity observed in the IDDM patients may have limited the hepatic lactate uptake during exercise. Indeed, the absence of decreasing lactate levels in the IDDM patients as exercise continued to exhaustion suggests that in these patients muscle glycogen represents an important energy supply for exercising muscle during all exercise periods.

In agreement with previous studies (1, 7, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16, 19), preexercise glucose load in normal controls significantly reduced FFA levels at rest and during all exercise periods. Taken together, the hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia in the early stages of exercise and the lowered GH but not cortisol levels during all exercise periods could suggest that glucose, insulin, and GH levels would play a role in the FFA mobilization during exercise. In the IDDM patients, however, glucose load provoked hyperglycemia and decrease in GH levels but no change in FFA levels during exercise. Therefore, we conclude that, in fact, insulin is the major inhibitory factor of FFA mobilization during exercise in humans.

The exercise-induced enhancement of glucagon levels found in the present study in both groups studied might be catecholamine mediated, because neither IDDM patients nor normal controls showed any hypoglycemic state during all exercise periods. In IDDM patients, the rise in glucose levels in the glucose trial did not suppress glucagon release during exercise but, in contrast, elicited a paradoxical increase in this hormone, as previously reported by other investigators (9). The greater glucagon response in the IDDM patients was probably due to a loss of the restraining influence of insulin on glucagon secretion. In normal controls, despite the fact that glucose load caused significant increases in glucose and insulin levels, no restraining of glucagon levels during exercise was observed. It seems that in normal controls the neurotransmitted signals during exercise may overcome the glucose and insulin effect on glucagon release during exercise.

Although we have not measured free insulin concentration in the IDDM patients, both the absence of an abrupt blood glucose reduction in the early stage of exercise with placebo and the increased blood glucose during up to 60 min of exercise in the glucose trial confirm that our IDDM patients were not in a hyperinsulinemic state during the experimental procedures.

The motivation for exercise up to exhaustion could be different between the 2 experimental days. The experimental conditions under glucose or placebo administration were well controlled (see METHODS). During prolonged exercise, pedaling was continuously monitored by the same investigator (P. R. Ramires). Indeed, the subjects were asked to perform the exercise as long as they could, and the exhaustion state was only accepted when they pointed to number 10 on Borg's scale (8) and could no longer maintain pedaling at 60 revolutions/min for 10 s.

In conclusion, oral glucose ingestion 30 min before exercise improves endurance capacity in young normal controls and in a subgroup of well-controlled IDDM patients whose glucose levels decrease during exercise. Despite the fact that cycle ergometer exercise performed to exhaustion (55-60% of VO2 max) attenuates hyperglycemia provoked by glucose administration in young IDDM patients with no insulin administration for 12 h, it fails to normalize serum glucose levels in these patients.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors are grateful to Dr. Holly R. Middlekauff for critical review of this manuscript.


FOOTNOTES

   This project was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa and by Fundação E. J. Zerbini, São Paulo, Brazil.

Address for reprint requests: P. R. Ramires, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, School of Education, Dept. of Kinesiology, Rm. 1149, Gym. Unit II, 2000 Observatory Dr., Madison, WI 53706-1189 (E-mail: ramires{at}gandalf.physed.wisc.edu).

Received 21 June 1996; accepted in final form 4 April 1997.


REFERENCES

1. Ahlborg, G., and P. Felig. Substrate utilization during prolonged exercise preceded by ingestion of glucose. Am. J. Physiol. 233 (Endocrinol. Metab. Gastrointest. Physiol. 2): E188-E194, 1977[Free Full Text].
2. Ahlborg, G., P. Felig, L. Hagenfeldt, R. Hendler, and J. Wahren. Substrate turnover during prolonged exercise in man: splanchnic and leg metabolism of glucose, free fatty acids, and amino acids. J. Clin. Invest. 53: 1080-1090, 1974.
3. Berger, M., P. Berchtold, H. J. Cuppers, H. Drost, H. K. Kley, W. A. Muller, W. Wiegelmann, H. Zimmerman-Telschow, F. A. Gries, H. L. Kruskemper, and H. Zimmermann. Metabolic and hormonal effects of muscular exercise in juvenile type diabetics. Diabetologia 13: 355-365, 1977[Medline].
4. Berger, M., S. A. Hagg, M. N. Goodman, and N. B. Ruderman. Glucose metabolism in perfused skeletal muscle: effects of starvation, diabetes, fatty acids, acetoacetate, insulin and exercise on glucose uptake and disposition. Biochem. J. 158: 191-202, 1976[Medline].
5. Berger, M., and F. W. Kemmer. Discussion: exercise, fitness, and diabetes. In: Exercise, Fitness, and Health: A Consensus of Current Knowledge, edited by C. Bouchard, R. J. Shephard, T. Stephens, J. R. Sutton, and B. D. McPherson. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1990, p. 491-495.
6. Bjorkman, O. Fuel metabolism during exercise in normal and diabetic man. Diabetes Metab. Rev. 1: 319-357, 1986[Medline].
7. Bonen, A., S. A. Malcolm, R. D. Kilgour, K. P. MacIntyre, and A. N. Belcastro. Glucose ingestion before and during intense exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 50: 766-771, 1981[Abstract/Free Full Text].
8. Borg, G. A. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 14: 377-381, 1982[Medline].
9. Buchanan, K. D., and A. M. McCarroll. Abnormalities of glucagon metabolism in untreated diabetes mellitus. Lancet 2: 1394-1395, 1972[Medline].
10. Chryssanthopoulos, C., L. C. Hennessy, and C. Williams. The influence of pre-exercise glucose ingestion on endurance running capacity. Br. J. Sports Med. 28: 105-109, 1994[Abstract].
11. Costill, D. L., E. Coyle, G. Dalsky, W. Evans, W. Fink, and D. Hoopes. Effects of elevated plasma FFA and insulin on muscle glycogen usage during exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 43: 695-699, 1977[Abstract/Free Full Text].
12. Devlin, J. T., J. Calles-Escadon, and E. S. Horton. Effects of preexercise snack feeding on endurance cycle exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 60: 980-985, 1986[Abstract/Free Full Text].
13. Foster, C., D. L. Costill, and W. J. Fink. Effects of preexercise feedings on endurance performance. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 11: 1-5, 1979.
14. Gleeson, M., R. J. Maughan, and P. L. Greenhaff. Comparison of the effects of pre-exercise feeding of glucose, glycerol and placebo on endurance and fuel homeostasis in man. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 55: 645-653, 1986.
15. Hagg, S. A., S. I. Taylor, and N. B. Ruberman. Glucose metabolism in perfused skeletal muscle: pyruvate dehydrogenase activity in starvation, diabetes and exercise. Biochem. J. 158: 203-210, 1976[Medline].
16. Hargreaves, M., D. L. Costill, W. J. Fink, D. S. King, and R. A. Fielding. Effect of pre-exercise carbohydrate feedings on endurance cycling performance. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 19: 33-36, 1987[Medline].
17. Kelley, D., A. Mitrakou, H. Marsh, F. Schwenk, J. Benn, G. Sonnenberg, M. Arcangeli, T. Aoki, J. Sorensen, M. Berger, P. Sonksen, and J. Gerich. Skeletal muscle glycolysis, oxidation, and storage of an oral glucose load. J. Clin. Invest. 81: 1563-1571, 1988.
18. Kemmer, F. W., and M. Berger. Exercise and diabetes mellitus: physical activity as a part of daily life and its role in the treatment of diabetic patients. Int. J. Sports Med. 4: 77-88, 1983[Medline].
19. Koivisto, V. A., M. Harkonen, S. L. Karonen, P. H. Groop, R. Elovainio, E. Ferrannini, L. Sacca, and R. A. DeFronzo. Glycogen depletion during prolonged exercise: influence of glucose, fructose, or placebo. J. Appl. Physiol. 58: 731-737, 1985[Abstract/Free Full Text].
20. Koivisto, V. A., and H. Yki-Jarvinen. Changes in muscle glucose metabolism in type 1 diabetes. Ann. Med. 22: 201-205, 1990[Medline].
21. Menon, R. K., A. A. Grace, W. Burgoyne, V. A. Fonseca, I. M. James, and P. Dandona. Muscle blood flow in diabetes mellitus: evidence of abnormality after exercise. Diabetes Care 15: 693-695, 1992[Abstract].
22. Mondon, C. E., I. R. Jones, S. Azhar, C. B. Hollenbeck, and G. M. Reaven. Lactate production and pyruvate dehydrogenase activity in fat and skeletal muscle from diabetic rats. Diabetes 41: 1547-1554, 1992[Abstract].
23. National Diabetic Data Group. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance. Diabetes 28: 1037-1057, 1979.
24. Noma, A., H. Okabe, and M. Kita. A new colorimetric micro-determination of free fatty acids in serum. Clin. Chim. Acta 43: 317-320, 1973[Medline].
25. Ramires, P. R., C. L. M. Forjaz, M. E. R. Silva, J. Diament, W. Nicolau, B. Liberman, and C. E. Negrão. Exercise tolerance is lower in type I diabetics compared with normal young men. Metabolism 42: 191-195, 1993[Medline].
26. Richter, E. A., and H. Galbo. Diabetes, insulin and exercise. Sports Med. 3: 275-288, 1986[Medline].
27. Sahlin, K., A. Katz, and S. Broberg. Tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates in human muscle during prolonged exercise. Am. J. Physiol. 259 (Cell Physiol. 28): C834-C841, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].
28. Saltin, B., M. Houston, E. Nygaard, T. Graham, and J. Wahren. Muscle fiber characteristics in healthy men and patients with juvenile diabetes. Diabetes 28: 93-99, 1979.
29. Scholander, P. F. Analyzer for accurate estimation of respiratory gases in one-half cubic centimeter samples. J. Biol. Chem. 167: 235-250, 1947[Free Full Text].
30. Spencer, M. K., Z. Yan, and A. Katz. Carbohydrate supplementation attenuates IMP accumulation in human muscle during prolonged exercise. Am. J. Physiol. 261 (Cell Physiol. 30): C71-C76, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].
31. Vranic, M. A key to understanding the pathogenesis of diabetes (indirect effects of insulin). Diabetes 41: 1188-1205, 1992[Abstract].
32. Wahren, J., L. Hagenfeldt, and P. Felig. Splanchnic and leg exchange of glucose, amino acids, and free fatty acids during exercise in diabetes mellitus. J. Clin. Invest. 55: 1303-1314, 1975.
33. Wallberg-Henriksson, H. Acute exercise: fuel homeostasis and glucose transport in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 21: 356-361, 1989[Medline].
34. Wasserman, D. H., and N. N. Abumrad. Physiological bases for the treatment of the physically active individual with diabetes. Sports Med. 7: 376-392, 1989[Medline].

0161-7567/97 $5.00 Copyright © 1997 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
O. Rouyer, J. Zoll, F. Daussin, C. Damge, P. Helms, S. Talha, L. Rasseneur, F. Piquard, and B. Geny
Muscle: Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on skeletal muscle oxidative function and exercise capacity in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats
Exp Physiol, November 1, 2007; 92(6): 1047 - 1056.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. Robitaille, M.-C. Dube, S. J. Weisnagel, D. Prud'homme, D. Massicotte, F. Peronnet, and C. Lavoie
Substrate source utilization during moderate intensity exercise with glucose ingestion in Type 1 diabetic patients
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2007; 103(1): 119 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. C. Riddell, O. Bar-Or, M. Hollidge-Horvat, H. P. Schwarcz, and G. J. F. Heigenhauser
Glucose ingestion and substrate utilization during exercise in boys with IDDM
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2000; 88(4): 1239 - 1246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ramires, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Negrão, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ramires, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Negrão, C. E.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online