Journal of Applied Physiology Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 82: 1210-1218, 1997;
8750-7587/97 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Belke, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lopaschuk, G. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Belke, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lopaschuk, G. D.

Journal of Applied Physiology
Vol. 82, No. 4, pp. 1210-1218, April 1997
METABOLISM

Effects of hypothermia on energy metabolism in rat and Richardson's ground squirrel hearts

Darrell D. Belke1, Lawrence C. H. Wang2, and Gary D. Lopaschuk1

1 Departments of Pharmacology and Pediatrics and 2 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2S2

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Belke, Darrell D., Lawrence C. H. Wang, and Gary D. Lopaschuk. Effects of hypothermia on energy metabolism in rat and Richardson's ground squirrel hearts. J. Appl. Physiol. 82(4): 1210-1218, 1997.---Glycolysis, glucose oxidation, palmitate oxidation, and cardiac function were measured in isolated working hearts from ground squirrels and rats subjected to a hypothermia-rewarming protocol. Hearts were perfused initially for 30 min at 37°C, followed by 2 h of hypothermic perfusion at 15°C, after which hearts were rewarmed to 37°C and further perfused for 30 min. Functional recovery in ground squirrel hearts was greater than in rat hearts after rewarming. Hypothermia-rewarming had a similar general effect on the various metabolic pathways in both species. Despite these similarities, total energy substrate metabolic rates were greater in rat than ground squirrel hearts during hypothermia despite a lower level of work being performed by the rat hearts, indicating that rat hearts are less efficient than ground squirrel hearts during hypothermia. After rewarming, energy substrate metabolism recovered completely in both species, although cardiac work remained depressed in rat hearts. The difference in functional recovery between rat and ground squirrel hearts after rewarming cannot be explained by general differences in energy substrate metabolism during hypothermia or after rewarming.

glucose oxidation; glycolysis; fatty acid oxidation; cardiac efficiency


INTRODUCTION

HYPOTHERMIA IS ROUTINELY USED during heart surgery and transplantation as a means of reducing metabolic demand to protect the heart from the damaging effects of prolonged exposure to ischemia. Although considerable attention has been focused on delaying or avoiding the damaging effects of ischemia, the detrimental effects of hypothermia alone have received little attention. Prolonged exposure of whole animals to hypothermia results in a poor recovery of heart function on rewarming, eventually leading to circulatory collapse (29). Under these conditions, the recovery of function during rewarming is depressed to a greater extent than the recovery of oxidative metabolism, suggesting a decreased efficiency in translating energy metabolism into work. In isolated working hearts, exposure to high levels of fatty acids during hypothermia and rewarming leads to a greater depression in functional recovery after rewarming (20, 26). This effect is analogous to that observed after ischemia-reperfusion where high fatty acid concentrations can depress the recovery of function after reperfusion (15, 16). Under these conditions, fatty acids depress glucose oxidation, leading to a greater dissociation between glycolysis and glucose oxidation and a greater production of H+ (16). While most aspects of energy metabolism during hypothermia deal with the preservation of ATP and creatine phosphate (see Ref. 27 for example), or the addition of substrates such as glucose and oxygen to cardioplegic solutions to enhance ATP production (5, 28), little is known about the potential effects of hypothermia and rewarming on energy substrate metabolism and energy utilization in relation to work.

Although exposure to hypothermia is deleterious to many mammalian species, a few species have evolved the means of safely utilizing low body temperatures to survive in cold environments. Heart function in these animals is maintained at temperatures approaching 0°C (3, 4, 17), and they are capable of recovering normal heart function on rewarming despite spending days to weeks at temperatures just above freezing (31). Although the nature of this cold tolerance is not completely understood, it appears to be an innate property of hearts from hibernating species regardless of season and physiological state within the annual hibernation cycle (3, 4). Furthermore, these animals are capable of adapting to a heavy reliance on fat metabolism as a source of energy during hibernation (7). Little is known about energy substrate metabolism and energy utilization in hibernating species under conditions of hypothermia and rewarming. Whether cardiac function in these animals is affected by the presence of high concentrations of fatty acids after rewarming from hypothermia, and whether myocardial energy substrate metabolism differs from that of species more sensitive to low temperatures, remains to be examined.

This study examined cardiac function and energy substrate metabolism in both rat hearts (cold-sensitive species) and Richardson's ground squirrel hearts (cold-tolerant species) during hypothermia and rewarming in the presence of high levels of fatty acids. We tested the hypothesis that, unlike rat hearts (20, 26), the recovery of cardiac function after rewarming in Richardson's ground squirrel hearts is not depressed by the presence of high concentrations of fatty acids in the perfusion medium. In addition, we compared energy substrate metabolism in the two species to determine whether differences in substrate metabolism could aid in understanding how hypothermia-rewarming affects myocardial performance.


METHODS

Animals and materials. Sprague-Dawley rats were obtained from Charles River (Montreal, PQ). Richardson's ground squirrels (Spermophilus richardsonii) were live trapped within a 50-km radius of Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Both species were fed rat chow (containing 4-6% fat) and given water ad libitum. Because ground squirrels exhibit a circannual transition between their hibernating and nonhibernating states, captured animals were maintained in the laboratory for at least 2 mo to determine their state in the hibernation cycle. Animals used in this study were trapped in the spring after emergence from hibernation in the wild. As a consequence, the ground squirrels used in this study were in the nonhibernating state. [5-3H]glucose, [U-14C]glucose, and [9,10-3H]palmitate were obtained from Du Pont-New England Nuclear. Bovine serum albumin (fraction V) was obtained from Boehringer Mannheim. Hyamine hydroxide was obtained from New England Nuclear. ACS scintillation fluid was obtained from Amersham. All other chemicals were reagent grade.

Heart perfusions. Male Sprague-Dawley rats or Richardson's ground squirrels (both genders) were anesthetized with 60 mg/kg pentobarbitol sodium. Heparin (150 U/kg) was injected into the superior vena cava of ground squirrels for 30 s before removal of the heart to prevent clot formation. Hearts were quickly excised, the aorta was cannulated, and a retrograde perfusion with Krebs-Henseleit solution (pH 7.4, gassed with 95% O2-5% CO2) was initiated, as described previously (15). During the initial retrograde perfusion, excess tissue was trimmed from the heart, the pulmonary arteries were cut, and the left atrium was cannulated. After a 10-min period of retrograde perfusion, hearts were switched to an antegrade working mode by clamping off of the aortic inflow line from the Langendorff reservoir while the left atrial line was simultaneously opened. Perfusion solution was delivered to spontaneously beating hearts at a preload (left atrial) pressure of 11.5 mmHg and was ejected from the heart into a compliance chamber containing ~1 ml of air, after which it fed into an aortic outflow line preset to an afterload column height of 80 mmHg. Perfusate flowing from the aortic outflow line was returned to the buffer reservoir (by gravity) and was subsequently delivered, via a peristaltic pump, to an oxygenator that fed the left atrium. Spontaneously beating hearts were used throughout the experiment, with heart rate (HR) and peak systolic pressure (PSP) being measured by a Gould P21 pressure transducer (Gould Instruments, Cleveland, OH) attached to the aortic outflow line. Cardiac output and aortic flow were measured by using in-line flow probes (Transonic Systems, Ithaca, NY) attached to the preload and afterload lines, respectively. Under these conditions, cardiac output refers to the flow out the aorta and through the coronary arteries while aortic flow refers to that fraction of solution pumped by the heart through the aorta and up the afterload line. Coronary flow is obtained by subtracting the two values. Cardiac work was calculated as the product of cardiac output and PSP.

Perfusion conditions. Working heart perfusion buffer consisted of Krebs-Henseleit solution containing 1.25 mM free calcium, 11 mM glucose, and 1.2 mM palmitate bound to 3% bovine serum albumin. The working heart perfusion buffer reservoir and the buffer oxygenator were connected to two circulating water baths set to regulate heart temperature at either 37 or 15°C. During both the initial control period and the rewarming period, the reservoir and oxygenator were connected to a 37°C water bath, while during the intervening hypothermic perfusion period they were connected to a 15°C water bath. The perfusion protocol is shown in Fig. 1. Hearts were initially perfused at 37°C for 30 min (0-30 min period on Fig. 1), cooled to 15°C over the next 10 min (30-40 min), and maintained at this temperature for 2 h (40-160 min). After the hypothermic period, hearts were rewarmed to 37°C over a 10-min period (160-170 min) and maintained at this temperature for a further 30 min (170-200 min). At the end of the perfusion, hearts were frozen with Wollenberger clamps cooled to the temperature of liquid nitrogen. An additional series of hearts was frozen at the end of the initial control and hypothermia periods for analysis of glycogen and triacylglycerol contents.
Fig. 1. Hypothermia-perfusion protocol for isolated working ground squirrel and rat hearts. Arrows indicate time points at which functional parameters were assessed and buffer samples for substrate metabolism were taken.
[View Larger Version of this Image (11K GIF file)]

Measurement of glycolysis, glucose oxidation, and palmitate oxidation. Glycolysis and glucose oxidation were measured simultaneously in the working heart by perfusing with a solution containing [5-3H-U-14C]glucose [specific activity equaled 200,000 disintegrations/min (dpm)/ml of 3H and 200,000 dpm/ml of 14C]. Glycolysis was measured by quantitatively collecting the 3H2O liberated from [5-3H]glucose at the triose phosphate isomerase step of the glycolytic flux pathway (9), as outlined by Saddik and Lopaschuk (25). Glucose oxidation was measured by quantitative collection of 14CO2 produced by dehydrogenases within heart mitochondria (16). This included 14CO2 released as a gas from the sealed system and [14C]bicarbonate retained in the solution.

Palmitate oxidation was measured in a separate series of hearts, in which the solution contained [9,10-3H]palmitate (specific activity equaled 80,000 dpm/ml of 3H). Palmitate oxidation was measured as the amount of 3H2O liberated from [3H]palmitate (measured separately from glycolysis), as outlined by Saddik and Lopaschuk. Perfusate samples for substrate utilization were collected every 10 min during the normothermic control and rewarmed periods, and every 30 min during hypothermia.

Acetyl-CoA production from the various metabolic pathways was calculated by using molar ratios of 2 mol acetylCoA produced/mol of glucose oxidized and 8 mol acetyl-CoA produced/mol of palmitate oxidized. The efficiency of converting substrate oxidation into cardiac work was calculated by using total acetyl-CoA production from glucose and palmitate metabolism and the values of cardiac work obtained during the control, hypothermia, and rewarmed periods. H+ production from the imbalance between glycolysis and glucose oxidation was calculated as described previously (16). H+ production was calculated for both species for the control, hypothermia, and rewarmed periods and during the period of rewarming from 15 to 37°C (the period between 160 and 170 min).

O2 consumption and cardiac work were measured at 37 and 15°C in a separate series of hearts to determine whether cardiac efficiency calculated from acetyl-CoA production at these temperatures reflect true changes in cardiac efficiency. This was done to ensure that cardiac efficiency values calculated from acetyl-CoA production are not influenced by the preferential utilization of unlabeled endogenous substrates by any of the groups. In these hearts, the pulmonary artery was cannulated, and O2 consumption was measured in the effluent from the pulmonary artery by using an O2-sensing electrode. After the measurement of O2 consumption at 37°C, hearts were cooled to 15°C and O2 consumption was measured. The O2 electrode was calibrated at each temperature to avoid artifacts induced by the changes in electrode performance and solution O2 solubility.

Determination of glycogen and triacylglycerol levels. Glycogen was extracted from hearts frozen at the end of the control, hypothermia, and rewarmed periods, according to the method of Bergmeyer and Grassl (2). Glucose released from the acid hydrolysis of glycogen was measured by using a glucose determination kit from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO). Tissue lipids were extracted and separated as described previously (14). After separation of neutral lipids from phospholipids on the silicic acid column, the neutral lipid fraction was dried for the determination of triacylglycerol content by using a triacylglycerol kit from Wako (Osaka, Japan). Values for triacylglycerol are expressed as micromoles per gram of dry weight after conversion by using the molecular weight of triolein (885 g/mol).

Statistical analysis. A two-way analysis of variance followed by a Student-Newman-Keuls multiple-comparisons test was used to test for differences between the species and the effects of hypothermia and rewarming. A paired t-test was used to test for significance in O2 consumption within species for hearts perfused at 37 and at 15°C. A value of P < 0.05 was considered to be significant. All values presented represent means ± SE. The values presented in Tables 1, 2, 3, and 7 as the average for the control, hypothermia, and rewarmed periods represent values obtained by first averaging the data collected over that time period for the individual animals before compilation of the data for individual animals.

Table 1. Effects of hypothermia and rewarming on mechanical function of isolated working hearts from ground squirrels and rats


Heart Rate, beats/min Coronary Flow, ml/min PSP, mmHg Cardiac Output, ml/min Cardiac Work, mmHg · ml · min-1 · 10 -2 CF/CW, mmHg-1 · 102

Control
  Ground squirrel 260 ± 15  32.8 ± 2.8  111.0 ± 5.4  48.1 ± 5.6  55.9 ± 7.7  0.76 ± 0.08 
  Rat 225 ± 7  17.8 ± 1.0* 120.4 ± 3.2  43.4 ± 2.9  52.4 ± 3.8  0.54 ± 0.14 
Hypothermia
  Ground squirrel 40 ± 4dagger 17.9 ± 2.9dagger 83.2 ± 7.1dagger 21.1 ± 3.9dagger 19.6 ± 4.4dagger 1.38 ± 0.16dagger
  Rat 32 ± 1dagger 8.8 ± 0.7*dagger 93.6 ± 1.9dagger 8.8 ± 0.7*dagger 8.3 ± 0.6*dagger 1.06 ± 0.03dagger
Rewarmed
  Ground squirrel 295 ± 15  33.6 ± 3.5  101.2 ± 4.7  48.3 ± 5.4  51.2 ± 6.7  0.83 ± 0.11 
  Rat 244 ± 8  14.1 ± 1.2* 98.4 ± 3.2dagger 21.1 ± 2.6*dagger 19.1 ± 3.6*dagger 0.81 ± 0.08

Values are means ± SE for 16 ground squirrel hearts and 17 rat hearts. PSP, peak systolic pressure; CF/CW, coronary flow normalized for cardiac work. * Values that are significantly different between rats and ground squirrels. dagger Values that are significantly different from respective control values.

Table 2. Effects of hypothermia and rewarming on steady-state rates of glycolysis, glucose oxidation, and palmitate oxidation in hearts from ground squirrels and rats


Glycolysis Glucose Oxidation Palmitate Oxidation

Control
  Ground squirrel 887 ± 270  81 ± 20  529 ± 78 
  Rat 1,459 ± 185  89 ± 15  796 ± 50*
Hypothermia
  Ground squirrel 58 ± 16dagger 46 ± 11  102 ± 14dagger
  Rat 189 ± 53dagger 88 ± 8* 150 ± 15*dagger
Rewarmed
  Ground squirrel 1,127 ± 258  232 ± 57dagger 612 ± 64 
  Rat 1,773 ± 695  168 ± 24dagger 674 ± 50

Values are means ± SE given in nmol · g dry wt-1 · min-1 for 7 ground squirrel and 9 rats hearts used to measure glycolysis and glucose oxidation and for 9 ground squirrel and 8 rat hearts used to measure palmitate oxidation. * Values that are significantly different between rats and squirrels. dagger Values that are significantly different from respective control values.

Table 3. Substrate metabolism normalized for cardiac work in ground squirrel and rat hearts


Glycolysis Glucose Oxidation Palmitate Oxidation

Control
  Ground squirrel 19.5 ± 12.8  1.0 ± 0.3  4.2 ± 0.3 
  Rat 7.2 ± 1.3  0.4 ± 0.1  4.9 ± 0.6 
Hypothermia
  Ground squirrel 6.7 ± 2.5  3.4 ± 1.1dagger 2.4 ± 0.5dagger
  Rat 5.3 ± 1.6  2.8 ± 0.4dagger 5.9 ± 0.8*
Rewarmed
  Ground squirrel 29.7 ± 15.1  3.8 ± 0.9dagger 4.7 ± 0.5 
  Rat 19.5 ± 6.1  2.2 ± 0.7dagger 17.7 ± 2.7*dagger

Values are means ± SE given in nmol · mmHg-1 · ml-1 · 102 for 7 ground squirrel and 9 rats hearts used to measure glycolysis and glucose oxidation and for 9 ground squirrel and 8 rat hearts used to measure palmitate oxidation. * Values that are significantly different between rats and squirrels. dagger Values that are significantly different from respective control values.

Table 7. H+ production from uncoupling of glycolysis and glucose oxidation in ground squirrel and rat hearts


Control Hypothermia Rewarmed
160-170 min 170-200 min

Ground   squirrel 1,613 ± 524  49 ± 28  646 ± 191  1,791 ± 479 
Rat 2,742 ± 344  248 ± 103  2,625 ± 561* 3,155 ± 1,361

Values are means ± SE given in nmol H+ · min-1 · g dry wt-1 for 7 ground squirrels and 9 rats. * Values that are significantly different between rats and squirrels.


RESULTS

Mechanical function. Cardiac work in rat and ground squirrel hearts over the course of the experimental protocol is shown in Fig. 2. Average values for various functional parameters during the initial euthermic period (control), the hypothermic period, and during the rewarming period are shown in Table 1. During the initial control period, cardiac work did not differ between ground squirrel and rat hearts. Whereas coronary flow was significantly higher in ground squirrel hearts over the course of the perfusion protocol, no species differences were observed in coronary flow normalized for cardiac work (Table 1).
Fig. 2. Cardiac work in hypothermic and rewarmed isolated working hearts from ground squirrels (bullet ) and rats (black-triangle). Values represent means ± SE for 16 ground squirrel hearts and 17 rat hearts. * Significantly different between species at same time point.
[View Larger Version of this Image (20K GIF file)]

Hypothermia caused a significant depression in all functional parameters measured in both ground squirrel and rat hearts. Coronary flow and cardiac output were significantly higher in ground squirrel hearts compared with rat hearts, and cardiac work was over twofold higher in ground squirrel hearts during hypothermia (Table 1). Despite being depressed as a result of hypothermia, the level of cardiac work being performed by the hearts of both species was stable over the course of the 2-h hypothermia period. Similarly, although coronary flow was significantly lower in both species, coronary flow normalized for cardiac work actually increased as a result of hypothermia, suggesting that the supply of substrates and O2 was adequate.

Whereas cardiac work (and all other functional parameters) recovered to prehypothermic levels in ground squirrel hearts (Table 1), it was significantly depressed in rat hearts, recovering only to a maximum of 62% of prehypothermia values immediately after rewarming and slowly decreasing over the remainder of the rewarmed period (Fig. 2). All functional parameters, with the exception of HR and PSP, were significantly lower in the rat hearts compared with ground squirrel hearts during the rewarmed period. PSP, cardiac output, and cardiac work were all significantly lower than the prehypothermia control period values in rat hearts. Although coronary flow rates were slightly depressed in rat hearts during rewarming, the level of coronary flow was not depressed relative to the level of cardiac work obtained from these hearts, suggesting that perfusion was adequate for the level of work being obtained from these hearts. This observation is supported by the failure to see a significant increase in glycolysis in these hearts during the rewarmed period (see Energy substrate metabolism).

Energy substrate metabolism. The average rates for glycolysis, glucose oxidation, and palmitate oxidation over the different phases of the experiment are shown in Table 2. During the initial control perfusion, glucose metabolism was similar between the two species. Although glycolytic rates tended to be higher in rat hearts, this difference was not statistically significant. The only major species difference was observed in palmitate oxidation, where rates were significantly higher in rat hearts. Cooling hearts to 15°C did not affect the two pathways of glucose metabolism equally. Hypothermia resulted in a severe reduction in the rate of glucose passing through glycolysis in both species, whereas glucose oxidation was largely unaffected. The rate of glucose oxidation remained unchanged from control period values in rat hearts but decreased slightly in ground squirrel hearts so that glucose oxidation rates were significantly lower in ground squirrel hearts than in rat hearts during the hypothermic period. Palmitate oxidation was significantly depressed in ground squirrel and rats, being decreased to 19% of control period values in both species. Despite the decrease as a result of hypothermia, the rate of palmitate oxidation remained significantly higher in rat than ground squirrel hearts.

After rewarming, rates of substrate metabolism recovered to, or exceeded, values obtained during the prehypothermic control period, with the rate of glucose oxidation being significantly increased in both species after rewarming. Glycolysis was slightly (although not significantly) increased in both species despite the fact that function and coronary flow were only depressed in rat hearts, suggesting that this increase does not occur as a result of ischemia.

Because changes in temperature may affect energy substrate metabolism either by acting directly to slow the enzymes involved in the metabolic pathway or by reducing metabolic demand by decreasing the level of work being performed by the heart, substrate metabolism through the individual pathways during the various phases of the protocol was also normalized for cardiac work (Table 3). When glycolysis is normalized for cardiac work, no significant species differences are observed, and whereas glycolysis tends to increase during rewarming, the values are not significantly different from the control period. Glucose oxidation normalized for cardiac work was significantly higher than control period values during hypothermia and rewarming in both species. In contrast, palmitate oxidation normalized for cardiac work increased slightly (although not significantly) in rats during hypothermia but decreased significantly in ground squirrels. This suggests that the increased reliance on glucose oxidation in rat hearts during hypothermia is not accompanied by a reduction in palmitate oxidation. After rewarming, palmitate oxidation returns to control period values in ground squirrel hearts but is significantly elevated in rat hearts. These results suggest that substrate metabolism, especially oxidative metabolism, is not solely affected by the changes in cardiac work that occur as a result of hypothermia and rewarming.

Acetyl-CoA production from substrate metabolism. The contribution of glucose and palmitate to acetyl-CoA production for oxidative metabolism is shown in Table 4. In both species, palmitate provides the bulk of acetyl-CoA for oxidative metabolism, and while the contribution from glucose is increased three- to fourfold during hypothermia, palmitate still supplies over 87%. The two species show similar changes in the contribution of substrates to overall metabolism, despite the significantly higher level of total acetyl-CoA production in rat hearts during the control and hypothermic periods. During the rewarmed period, the total acetyl-CoA derived from substrates was similar between the species despite differences in the recovery of cardiac work, suggesting a species difference in converting acetyl-CoA into ATP or an increased expenditure in converting ATP into mechanical work developed as a result of hypothermia-rewarming.

Table 4. Contribution of glucose and palmitate to acetyl-CoA production for oxidative metabolism in ground squirrel and rat hearts


Glucose Palmitate Total Acetyl-CoA

Control
  Ground squirrel 0.16 ± 0.04 (4) 4.23 ± 0.62 (96) 4.39 ± 0.62 
  Rat 0.18 ± 0.03 (3) 6.37 ± 0.40* (97) 6.55 ± 0.40*
Hypothermia
  Ground squirrel 0.09 ± 0.02 (11) 0.82 ± 0.10dagger  (89) 0.91 ± 0.11dagger
  Rat 0.17 ± 0.02* (13) 1.20 ± 0.12*dagger  (87) 1.37 ± 0.12*dagger
Rewarmed
  Ground squirrel 0.46 ± 0.11dagger  (9) 4.89 ± 0.51 (91) 5.36 ± 0.53 
  Rat 0.34 ± 0.05dagger  (6) 5.39 ± 0.40 (94) 5.72 ± 0.41

Values are means ± SE given in µmol acetyl-CoA · g dry wt-1 · min-1;nos. in parentheses are percent contribution of glucose and palmitate to total acetyl-CoA production. Acetyl-CoA production from glucose and palmitate was calculated from values shown in Table 2. * Values that are significantly different between rats and squirrels. dagger Values that are significantly different from respective control values.

Cardiac efficiency during and after hypothermia. The efficiency of translating tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle activity into cardiac work is shown in Fig. 3. Whereas no species differences were observed during the control period perfusion, the two species responded differently when hearts were cooled to 15°C. During hypothermia, cardiac work was significantly higher in ground squirrel hearts (Table 1), despite the fact that overall oxidative metabolism was decreased (Table 4). As a result, ground squirrel hearts became more efficient during hypothermia, whereas efficiency decreased slightly in rat hearts, suggesting that hypothermia leads to differences in energy requirement between the two species. After rewarming, cardiac efficiency returned to prehypothermia levels in ground squirrel hearts but decreased in rat hearts so that the level of efficiency was lower than control period values.
Fig. 3. Efficiency of converting TCA cycle activity into cardiac work in ground squirrel (open bars) and rat (solid bars) hearts. Values represent means ± SE. dagger  Significantly different from initial control values. * Significantly different between species under same state.
[View Larger Version of this Image (18K GIF file)]

To determine whether the changes in cardiac efficiency observed during hypothermia, and calculated by using acetyl-CoA production, accurately reflect the response of metabolism and cardiac work in the two species, a series of hearts was perfused at 37 and 15°C for measurment of cardiac work and O2 consumption as an index of oxidative metabolism (Table 5). Under hypothermic conditions, cardiac work was decreased to 26% of euthermic values in ground squirrel hearts while O2 consumption decreased to 18% of euthermic values. In contrast, cardiac work decreased to 16% in rat hearts while O2 consumption only decreased to 24%. This indicates that a disparity between cardiac work and metabolism occurs in these species during hypothermia. Under these conditions, cardiac efficiency was observed to increase in ground squirrel hearts and to decrease in rat hearts as a result of cooling to 15°C. This suggests that the changes in cardiac efficiency calculated from substrate metabolism accurately reflect changes in the relationship between cardiac work and metabolism between the species at 15°C.

Table 5. O2 consumption and cardiac efficiency measured at 37 and 15°C in ground squirrel and rat hearts


Cardiac Work, mmHg · ml · min-1 · 10 -2 O2 Consumption, µmol O2/min Cardiac Efficiency, mmHg · ml · µmol O-12 · 10-2

Ground squirrel
  37°C 68.2 ± 17.6  16.6 ± 1.4  4.0 ± 0.7 
  15°C 18.1 ± 7.5* 3.0 ± 1.3* 5.6 ± 1.0*
Rat
  37°C 67.7 ± 7.3  14.5 ± 0.6  4.7 ± 0.5 
  15°C 11.1 ± 2.1* 3.5 ± 0.5* 3.2 ± 0.3*

Values are means ± SE for 10 rat hearts and 4 ground squirrels hearts. * Values that are significantly different between 37 and 15°C.

Effects of hypothermia and rewarming on glycogen and triacylglycerol levels. To determine whether the preferential mobilization of endogenous substrates may have affected the observed changes in substrate metabolism, glycogen and triacylglycerol levels were measured in hearts frozen at the end of the control, hypothermia, and rewarmed periods (Table 6). Although ground squirrels had lower glycogen and higher triacylglycerol levels than did the rats, the levels of these substrates did not vary significantly in either species over the course of the experiment. The lack of glycogen mobilization in rat hearts frozen at the end of the rewarmed period suggests that these hearts were not severely ischemic despite the decreased level of coronary flow observed in these hearts. These results suggest that endogenous substrates did not contribute significantly to overall energy substrate metabolism in either species during hypothermia or after rewarming.

Table 6. Glycogen and triacylglycerol levels of ground squirrel and rat hearts frozen at end of control, hypothermia, and rewarmed periods


Glycogen, µmol glucose/g dry wt Triacylglycerol, µmol/g dry wt

Control
  Ground squirrel 98.8 ± 7.7  39.0 ± 4.5 
  Rat 122.8 ± 12.6  20.5 ± 2.0*
Hypothermia
  Ground squirrel 91.8 ± 3.4  35.5 ± 5.6 
  Rat 116.9 ± 10.2  20.9 ± 2.9*
Rewarmed
  Ground squirrel 88.4 ± 7.9  43.2 ± 7.5 
  Rat 128.0 ± 8.6* 24.6 ± 2.5*

Values are means ± SE for 6 ground squirrel and rat hearts frozen at end of control period and at end of hypothermia period and for 8 ground squirrel and rat hearts frozen at end of rewarmed periods. * Values that are significantly different between rats and squirrels.

H+ production. The production of H+ resulting from the uncoupling of glycolysis and glucose oxidation has been implicated in decreasing the recovery of function after ischemia-reperfusion. We, therefore, calculated the rate of H+ production for the various periods of the perfusion protocol (Table 7). In both species, H+ production decreases significantly during hypothermia as the result of a decrease in overall glucose metabolism and a greater coupling between glycolysis and glucose oxidation. Included in Table 7 is the rate of H+ production for each species during the rewarming phase (160-170 min), calculated from the rates of glycolysis (1,567 ± 293 vs. 467 ± 94 nmol · min-1 · g dry wt-1, rat vs. ground squirrel) and glucose oxidation (254 ± 59 vs. 204 ± 58 nmol · min-1 · g dry wt-1, rat vs. ground squirrel) observed during this transition period. The values for this time period are presented as a rate for comparison with the other periods of the experiment despite the fact that both temperature and cardiac work increase during rewarming so that the values do not represent a true steady-state rate. Although H+ production tended to be higher in rat hearts, the differences were only significant during the rewarming period (160-170 min). This effect was primarily due to a faster recovery of glycolysis in rat than ground squirrel hearts during this period.


DISCUSSION

Although hypothermia is widely used during surgery as a means of reducing metabolic demand during ischemia, the effects of hypothermia itself on heart function and energy metabolism have received little attention. Previous studies have suggested that cold cardioplegia is less favorable than warm cardioplegia in preserving heart function (18). Similarly, whole animal hypothermia leads to a depression in heart function during rewarming (29), and substrates such as fatty acids are capable of exacerbating the depression of function after hypothermia and rewarming (20, 26). The potential interactions of hypothermia and rewarming with energy substrate metabolism and mechanical function have not been examined despite interest in stimulating oxidative metabolism to improve ATP production through the addition of substrates and O2 to the cardioplegic medium (5, 28) or the use of blood cardioplegia to provide additional O2-carrying capacity (30). Because plasma fatty acid levels can rise dramatically during surgery, the practice of using blood cardioplegia may expose the hypothermic heart to high concentrations of fatty acids. Thus an understanding of the interaction of hypothermia with metabolism and function would be beneficial in developing strategies for maximizing energy production and help to improve the recovery of function after rewarming.

Energy substrate preference during hypothermia and rewarming. In the present study, the recovery of function in ground squirrel hearts after rewarming was significantly better than that observed in rat hearts despite the presence of high concentrations of fatty acids in the perfusion medium. A general overview of metabolism revealed that hypothermia had a similar effect on metabolism in both species, with glycolysis being depressed to a greater extent than oxidative metabolism and palmitate oxidation being depressed to a greater extent than glucose oxidation. Because we only measured the fate of exogenously added energy substrates, the changes in substrate utilization that occur during hypothermia and rewarming could be due to the preferential utilization of endogenous substrates (glycogen and triacylglycerol). However, analysis of glycogen and triacylglycerol levels did not indicate preferential utilization of these substrates during hypothermia or after rewarming in both species. Similarly, the estimated changes in cardiac efficiency in both species as a result of hypothermia were similar whether substrate oxidation or O2 consumption was used as an index of metabolism, supporting the observation that endogenous substrate mobilization did not contribute significantly to energy metabolism during the experiment.

Previous estimates of hypothermia effects on glycolysis, determined by examining lactate production and glycogen depletion, have also suggested that glycolysis is greatly suppressed by hypothermia (24). By perfusing hearts with [3H]glucose and relevant concentrations of fatty acids, we were able to confirm these results by directly measuring the flux of glucose through the glycolytic pathway. Our observation that glycogen content was not significantly reduced as a result of hypothermia (Table 6) confirms previous findings that hypothermia itself does not increase glycogen utilization in the heart (23, 26). Although glycolytically derived ATP is thought to be preferentially used in the maintenance of transmembrane ionic gradients (8, 22), it is unlikely that the dramatic reduction in glycolysis plays a role in mediating the decreased cardiac efficiency or the poor recovery of function in rat hearts after rewarming, because glycolytic flux is similarly depressed in ground squirrels with none of the adverse effects. However, this observation assumes that glycolytically derived ATP plays an equally important role in both species, and a previous report has suggested that under hypothermic conditions (15°C) rat and ground squirrel hearts behave differently when glycolysis is inhibited by iodoacetate (6). This suggests that glycolytically derived ATP may be more important for myocyte physiology in rat than ground squirrel hearts. However, this study did not attempt to compensate for the depression in glucose oxidation that would result from the inhibition of glycolysis, making these results difficult to interpret. Clearly, any role that a depression in glycolysis may play in affecting heart function in hypothermic rat hearts requires further study.

The increase in glucose oxidation relative to the other pathways during hypothermia may be due to a rise in intracellular and intramitochondrial Ca2+ (12), leading to activation of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex through Ca2+-mediated activation of pyruvate dehydrogenase phosphatase (19). Regardless of how glucose oxidation is stimulated by hypothermia, the fact that it is significantly increased relative to cardiac work in both species suggests that this is a feature common to cold-sensitive and cold-tolerant species. Similarly, the fact that glucose oxidation is not depressed to the same degree as glycolysis may explain the beneficial effects of adding lactate to cardioplegic solutions under clinical conditions to improve the recovery of function (28). The conversion of lactate to pyruvate provides carbohydrate for the TCA cycle, bypassing the reduced supply from glycolysis.

When fatty acid oxidation rates are normalized for differences in cardiac work, the response of the two species to hypothermia differs. Under normal conditions, an increased reliance on glucose leads to a corresponding decrease in fatty acid utilization (24). In ground squirrel hearts, palmitate oxidation normalized for cardiac work decreased during hypothermia, but it is increased slightly relative to control period levels in rat hearts. Because fatty acid oxidation provides the bulk of acetyl-CoA for oxidative metabolism, this has the effect of increasing cardiac efficiency in the ground squirrel hearts and decreasing efficiency in rat hearts. Why fatty acid oxidation responds differently in the two species in relation to cardiac work during the hypothermic period is unknown, but it suggests that non-work-related energy expenditure may increase in rat hearts during hypothermia, with this effect becoming more exaggerated during rewarming when substrate metabolism becomes further uncoupled from cardiac work.

After rewarming, the recovery of substrate metabolism in both species returns to prehypothermia control period values in both species, suggesting that hypothermia-rewarming does not adversely affect substrate flux through the metabolic pathways. Rather, the poor recovery of function in rat hearts appears to be related to the inability to convert energy substrate metabolism into mechanical work. Whether this is due to an inability to convert energy substrates into ATP (i.e., an uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation) or ATP into mechanical work (i.e., more ATP is used for non-work-related reactions) cannot be distinguished in the present study.

H+ production during hypothermia and rewarming. A dissociation of glycolysis from glucose oxidation leading to a greater production of H+ is thought to contribute to Ca2+ overload during reperfusion after ischemia (16). Although hypothermia has been shown to lead to an increase in intracellular Ca2+ in rat myocardial tissue (12, 26), the reduction in H+ production as a result of the closer coupling of glycolysis and glucose oxidation makes it unlikely that fatty acids contribute to the rise in intracellular Ca2+ through this mechanism during hypothermia itself (this does not exclude the possibility that other sources of H+ can affect Ca2+ overload during hypothermia). Similarly, unlike the situation of reperfusion after ischemia (16), H+ production was not markedly enhanced in rat hearts during the rewarmed period. The only species difference that may account for the effect of fatty acids occurred during rewarming itself, when increased glycolysis in rat hearts lead to a significantly higher rate of H+ production. An overproduction of H+ during this period may have prevented or slowed the reestablishment of a normal intracellular Ca2+ concentration in rat hearts during rewarming when they may be trying to unload excess Ca2+ accumulated during hypothermia. This may account for the observation by Mjos et al. (20) that fatty acids are most detrimental when present during rewarming itself and for the higher level of tissue Ca2+ observed immediately after rewarming by Steigen et al. (26) in rat hearts perfused with 1.2 mM palmitate. A lower H+ production in ground squirrels during rewarming, along with better control of intracellular Ca2+ during hypothermia (11, 12), may have contributed to the better recovery of function after rewarming in this species.

Cardiac efficiency during hypothermia. The increased cardiac efficiency measured in ground squirrels by using O2 consumption as a metabolic index is similar to values reported by Burlington and Darvish (3) under similar conditions with use of a different species of ground squirrel. The effect of temperature on cardiac efficiency is variable according to the species and the extent of cooling. Some studies have shown that a mild hypothermia of only a few degrees can increase cardiac efficiency in dogs (21) and rats (3), whereas deeper hypothermia may reduce cardiac efficiency in dogs (1) and the mechanical efficiency in rat papillary muscle (13). The underlying reasons for the differences in cardiac efficiency at different temperatures and in different species remain an enigma. Differences in cardiac efficiency may result from species differences in the efficiency of oxidative phosphorylation, the expenditure of energy for noncontractile work such as ion homeostasis, changes in the sensitivity of myofibrils to activator Ca2+, or a combination of these effects. In this study, we are unable to distinguish which of these possibilities contribute to the effect of hypothermia on efficiency. The efficiency of producing energy through the various metabolic pathways may be considered as metabolic efficiency. Hypothermia can affect metabolic efficiency by altering the ratio of carbohydrates to fatty acids being oxidized (more O2 is required to obtain the same amount of ATP from fatty acids than from carbohydrates). Hypothermia can also potentially uncouple oxidative phosphorylation so that a general decrease in energy production occurs regardless of the type of energy substrate metabolized. Changes in efficiency involving the conversion of ATP into cardiac work may be considered as mechanical efficiency. Mechanical efficiency is dependent on the efficiency of ATP use by the various biochemical reactions required to maintain normal myocyte physiology, whether this is directly related to contractile force development or basal metabolism. A better distinction between the different factors affecting cardiac efficiency during hypothermia is required to gain a better understanding of the nature of the damage induced by exposure to hypothermia.

The decrease in cardiac efficiency in rat hearts during hypothermia may be related to a lower endogenous level of sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) activity and a greater thermal sensitivity of SR activity to inhibition at low temperatures in comparison with ground squirrels (10). In addition, the higher sensitivity of the SR Ca2+ release channel to stimulation by Ca2+ in rat hearts suggests that a futile cycle of SR Ca2+ uptake and release may develop in this species at low temperatures, which could account for the decreased efficiency in these hearts at low temperatures. Whether Ca2+ handling in ground squirrel hearts plays a role in increasing efficiency remains to be examined.

Summary. Hypothermia is capable of reducing energy substrate metabolism in cold-sensitive and cold-tolerant species but does not affect all metabolic pathways equally. Ground squirrels are able to recover cardiac work after rewarming despite the presence of high concentrations of fatty acids, whereas work was depressed in rat hearts under similar conditions. Hypothermia induced a general change in the pattern of metabolism, which was similar for the two species. The recovery of substrate metabolism does not appear to be the cause of the poor recovery of cardiac work in rat hearts after reperfusion. The major differences between cold-sensitive and cold-insensitive species involved cardiac efficiency during hypothermia and the coupling of glycolysis and glucose oxidation during rewarming. The extent to which factors, either individually or synergystically, act to reduce the recovery of function in the hearts of cold-sensitive species requires further study and may provide insights that are beneficial in improving function recovery in the heart after the use of hypothermia in a clinical setting.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was funded by grants from the Medical Research Council and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. G. D. Lopaschuk is a Medical Research Council of Canada Scientist and a Senior Scholar of the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. D. D. Belke is a trainee of the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada.


FOOTNOTES

Address for reprint requests: G. Lopaschuk, Cardiovascular Disease Research Group, 423 Heritage Medical Research Centre, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2S2.

Received 7 August 1996; accepted in final form 22 November 1996.


REFERENCES

1. Archie, J. P., and J. W. Kirklin. Effect of hypothermic perfusion on myocardial oxygen consumption and coronary resistance. Surg. Forum 24: 186-188, 1973. [Medline] .
2. Bergmeyer, J., and M. Grassl. Poly-, oligo-, and disaccharides: glycogen. In: Methods of Enzymatic Analysis (3rd ed.). New York: Academic, 1983. , chapt. 1.2, p. 11-18.
3. Burlington, R. F., and A. Darvish. Low-temperature performance of isolated working hearts from a hibernator and a nonhibernator. Physiol. Zool. 61: 387-395, 1988. .
4. Caprette, D. R., and J. B. Senturia. Isovolumetric performance of isolated ground squirrel and rat hearts at low temperature. Am. J. Physiol. 247 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 16): R722-R727, 1984. .
5. Doherty, N. E., J. F. Turocy, G. A. Geffin, D. D. O'Keefe, J. S. Titus, and W. M. Daggett. Benefits of glucose and oxygen in multidose cold cardioplegia. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 103: 219-229, 1992. [Abstract] .
6. Erasmus, R., and D. W. Rennie. Substrate uptake and utilization in normothermic and hypothermic perfused rat and ground squirrel hearts (Abstract). Physiologist 10: 163, 1967. .
7. Galster, W. A., and P. Morrison. Seasonal changes in serum lipids and proteins in the 13-lined ground squirrel. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 18: 489-501, 1966. [Medline] .
8. Glitsch, H. G., and A. Tappe. The Na+/K+ pump of cardiac Purkinje cells is preferentially fueled by glycolytic ATP production. Pfluegers Arch. 422: 380-385, 1993. [Medline] .
9. Hue, L., and H. Hers. On the use of [3H, 14C] labeled glucose in the study of the so-called futile cycles in liver and muscle. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 58: 532-539, 1974. [Medline] .
10. Liu, B., D. D. Belke, and L. C. H. Wang. Ca2+ uptake by cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum at low temperature in rats and ground squirrels. Am. J. Physiol. 272: R1121-R1127, 1997. [Abstract/Free Full Text] .
11. Liu, B., and L. C. H. Wang. Regulation of cardiac cytosolic free Ca2+ at low temperature in the Richardson's ground squirrel. In: Life in the Cold, edited by C. Carey, G. L. Florant, B. A. Wunder, and B. Howitz. Boulder, CO: Westview, 1993, p. 207-215. .
12. Liu, B., L. C. H. Wang, and D. D. Belke. Effect of low temperature on the cytosolic free Ca2+ in rat ventricular myocytes. Cell Calcium 12: 11-18, 1991. [Medline] .
13. Loiselle, D. S. The effects of temperature on the energetics of rat papillary muscle. Pfluegers Arch. 379: 173-180, 1979. [Medline] .
14. Lopaschuk, G. D., C. A. Hansen, and J. R. Neely. Fatty acid metabolism in hearts containing elevated levels of CoA. Am. J. Physiol. 250 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 19): H351-H359, 1986. [Abstract/Free Full Text] .
15. Lopaschuk, G. D., M. A. Spafford, N. J. Davies, and S. R. Wall. Glucose and palmitate oxidation in isolated working rat hearts reperfused after a period of transient global ischemia. Circ. Res. 66: 546-553, 1990. [Abstract/Free Full Text] .
16. Lopaschuk, G. D., R. B. Wambolt, and R. L. Barr. An imbalance between glycolysis and glucose oxidation is a possible explanation for the detrimental effects of high levels of fatty acids during aerobic reperfusion of ischemic hearts. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 264: 135-144, 1993. [Abstract/Free Full Text] .
17. Lyman, C. P., and D. C. Blinks. The effect of temperature on the isolated hearts of closely related hibernators and nonhibernators. J. Cell Comp. Biol. 54: 53-63, 1959. .
18. Mauney, M. C., and I. L. Kron. The physiological basis of warm cardioplegia. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 60: 819-823, 1995. [Abstract/Free Full Text] .
19. McCormack, J. G., R. L. Daniel, N. J. Osbaldeston, G. A. Rutter, and R. M. Denton. Mitochondrial Ca2+ transport and the role of matrix Ca2+ in mammalian tissues. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 20: 153-159, 1992. [Medline] .
20. Mjos, O. D., K. Ichihara, E. Fellenius, T. Myrmel, and J. R. Neely. Fatty acids suppress recovery of heart function after hypothermic perfusion. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 52: 965-970, 1991. [Abstract] .
21. Monroe, R. G., R. H. Stang, C. G. LaFarge, and J. Levy. Ventricular performance, pressure-volume relationships, and O2 consumption during hypothermia. Am. J. Physiol. 206: 67-73, 1964. .
22. Opie, L. H. Cardiac metabolism---emergence, decline and resurgence. Part I. Cardiovasc. Res. 26: 721-733, 1992. [Free Full Text] .
23. Orme, S. K., G. A. Kelly, K. Brendel, and R. Bressler. Glucose metabolism in the hypothermic perfused rat heart. Life Sci. 20: 597-608, 1977. [Medline] .
24. Randle, P. J., D. A. Priestman, S. Mistry, and A. Halsall. Mechanisms modifying glucose oxidation in diabetes mellitus. Diabetologica 37, Suppl. 2: S155-S161, 1994. 
25. Saddik, M., and G. D. Lopaschuk. Myocardial triglyceride turnover and contribution to energy substrate utilization in isolated working rat hearts. J. Biol. Chem. 266: 8162-8170, 1991. [Abstract/Free Full Text] .
26. Steigen, T. K., E. Aasum, T. Myrmel, and T. S. Larsen. Effects of fatty acids on myocardial calcium control during hypothermic perfusion. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 107: 233-241, 1994. [Abstract/Free Full Text] .
27. Stringham, J. C., J. H. Southard, J. Hegge, L. Triemstra, B. L. Fields, and F. O. Belzer. Limitations of heart preservation by cold storage. Transplantation 53: 287-294, 1992. [Medline] .
28. Teoh, K. H., D. A. G. Mickle, R. D. Weisel, M. M. Madonik, J. Ivanov, R. D. Harding, A. D. Romaschin, and J. C. Mullen. Improving myocardial metabolic and functional recovery after cardioplegic arrest. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 95: 788-798, 1988. [Abstract] .
29. Tveita, T., E. Mortensen, O. Hevroy, H. Refsum, and K. Ytrehus. Experimental hypothermia: effects of core cooling and rewarming on hemodynamics, coronary blood flow and myocardial metabolism in dogs. Anesth. Analg. 79: 212-218, 1994. [Abstract/Free Full Text] .
30. Vinten-Johansen, J., S. J. Julian, H. Yokoyama, W. E. Johnston, T. D. Smith, D. S. McGee, and A. R. Cordell. Efficacy of myocardial protection with hypothermic blood cardioplegia depends on oxygen. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 52: 9399-948, 1991. .
31. Wang, L. C. H. Ecological, physiological, and biochemical aspects of torpor in mammals and birds. In: Advances in Comparative and Environmental Physiology, edited by L. C. H. Wang. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1989, p. 361-401. .

0161-7567/97 $5.00 Copyright © 1997 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
F. van Breukelen and S. L. Martin
Molecular Biology of Thermoregulation: Invited Review: Molecular adaptations in mammalian hibernators: unique adaptations or generalized responses?
J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2002; 92(6): 2640 - 2647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Belke, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lopaschuk, G. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Belke, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lopaschuk, G. D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online