|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305-5119; 2 Program in Human Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2160; 3 Brain Research Institute, Universty of California, Los Angeles, California 90095; 4 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California 94035-1000; and 5 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-3030
Ariagno, Ronald L., Steven F. Glotzbach, Roger B. Baldwin,
David M. Rector, Susan M. Bowley, and Robert J. Moffat.
Dew-point hygrometry system for measurement of evaporative water
loss in infants. J. Appl. Physiol.
82(3): 1008-1017, 1997.
Evaporation of water from the skin is an
important mechanism in thermal homeostasis. Resistance hygrometry, in
which the water vapor pressure gradient above the skin surface is
calculated, has been the measurement method of choice in the majority
of pediatric investigations. However, resistance hygrometry is
influenced by changes in ambient conditions such as relative humidity,
surface temperature, and convection currents. We have developed a
ventilated capsule method that minimized these potential sources of
measurement error and that allowed second-by-second, long-term,
continuous measurements of evaporative water loss in sleeping infants.
Air with a controlled reference humidity (dew-point temperature = 0°C) is delivered to a small, lightweight skin capsule and mixed
with the vapor on the surface of the skin. The dew point of the
resulting mixture is measured by using a chilled mirror dew-point
hygrometer. The system indicates leaks, is mobile, and is accurate
within 2%, as determined by gravimetric calibration. Examples from a
recording of a 13-wk-old full-term infant obtained by using the system
give evaporative water loss rates of ~0.02
mgH2O · cm
2
· min
1
for normothermic baseline conditions and values up to 0.4 mgH2O · cm
2 ·
min
1 when the subject was
being warmed. The system is effective for clinical investigations that
require dynamic measurements of water loss.
evaporation; water loss; sweating; sleep; infant
EVAPORATIVE WATER LOSS (EWL) refers to the total water
loss through the skin, including both "sensible" (i.e., sweating)
and "insensible" (i.e., vapor diffusion through the epidermis)
water loss. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) is the portion of EWL that moves through the skin by diffusion, as contrasted with liquid water
ejected from the sweat glands.
EWL is an important component of heat exchange in the newborn infant
because of the permeability of the stratum corneum and the infant's
relatively large surface area-to-volume ratio. EWL is a major cause of
water loss and energy loss in premature infants during the first week
after birth (6, 12, 14, 23, 26, 31). In older patients, accurate
measurement of EWL is important to studies of burn damage and is also
useful in the assessment of skin barrier function in a variety of
dermatological applications (27, 29). Some studies in adult humans (15,
16, 21) have reported decreased sweat rates in rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep, which supports the contention that inhibition of
thermoregulatory mechanisms occurs during REM compared with non-REM
(NREM) sleep or awake states. However, Amoros et al. (1) reported that
cessation of sweating during REM was not supported in their study.
Recent studies have reported that local sweating rate may be similar during REM and NREM states in premature infants during warming (4) and
that evaporative water loss in term infants, aged between 2 days and 3 mo, is not different in REM and NREM states (3). Excessive sweating has
been reported in siblings of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), and
some SIDS victims had an elevated temperature at death (2, 8, 9, 13,
17, 24, 28). The higher proportion of REM in infants, compared with
adults, makes the effect of sleep state on thermoregulatory
capabilities important in these investigations. Studies of
thermoregulation and EWL in the infant may be important to investigate
abnormalities associated with SIDS.
The relationships between body temperature, sleep, and insensible loss
of weight have been the subject of scientific investigations for over
50 years (7). Determinations of EWL in infants have been made by a
number of techniques that have been discussed in several publications
(10, 20, 25).
Our research required a system less subject to environmentally induced
artifacts, one which could provide accurate,
time-resolved, local measurements of EWL, with a time constant
sufficiently low that transient events with a period of <1 min could
be detected. Such an instrument would be advantageous for studies
examining dynamic change in EWL. The ventilated-capsule system
developed in our laboratory addresses these requirements. The purpose
of this communication is to describe the system and to present bench and clinical performance data.
Figure 1 is a schematic depicting the key
system components: 1) air
preconditioner (chiller bath) to establish a consistent, known input
condition; 2) flowmeter upstream of
the vapor pickup site as one of two components necessary for leak
detection; 3) pickup capsule over
the measurement site; 4) dew-point
temperature (Tdp) sensor;
5) flowmeter downstream of the
sensor as the second component of leak detection;
6) controlled suction; and
7) hydrophobic tubing between the
preconditioning and Tdp
measurement components to maintain the integrity of the sample. Other
parameters (skin, rectal, room temperatures, etc.) can be monitored
simultaneously.
Inlet-stabilizing bath. The need for
an inlet-stabilizing bath was clearly demonstrated by a series of
trials in which significant scatter was observed due to variations in
inlet dew point (as much as 1°C) during a measurement period.
Chemical dryers (anhydrous calcium sulfate chambers) were tried, but
these dried the air too much. Dual
Tdp sensors were tested, but the
passive chiller bath was more easily maintained.
An ice-slurry, chiller bath apparatus (Fig.
2) preconditions the air to 0°C,
providing a stable reference Tdp
in the incoming air. Copper tubing (~4.25 m × 1/4-in. ID) was
rolled into a coil (10 cm high × 14 cm in diameter), with the low
end bent to a gentle right angle to pass through one hole of a two-hole
stopper. The stopper covers a petri dish (15 × 55 mm), which has
a layer of water at the bottom. The second hole accepts a piece of
thick-wall Teflon tubing (1/4 in. diameter × 55 mm length), which
mates to corrugated Teflon tubing. This apparatus is placed into an
ice-water slurry [some ice is held in position below the dish by
an aluminum-wire mesh (1.5 × 1.5 mm) lattice]. Air is drawn
through the chilled coil, over the water in the dish and exits to a
flowmeter. This arrangement precipitates moisture when the ambient
Tdp is >0°C and adds
moisture if ambient Tdp is
<0°C.
Interconnecting tubing. Teflon tubing
was used between the stabilizing bath and the dew-point sensor to avoid
absorption or desorption of water in the walls of the tubes.
Repeatability tests and hysteresis tests conducted to investigate the
system's performance under clinical conditions showed that the Tygon
tubing, originally used, was a source of error. Absorption and
desorption greatly increased stabilizing time (due to the time required
to "load" or "unload" the tubing), and results were
sensitive to changes in room temperature or thermal irradiation of the
tubing. As long as the room air temperature is above the measured
Tdp of the sample, neither
insulation nor heating of the tubing is necessary.
Upstream flow measurement. It is
essential to eliminate leaks in advance in the system before the sample
reaches the
Tdp-measuring chamber. The system operates subatmospherically, so
leakage would bring room air into the system. Leakage can be detected
by noting a discrepency between the upstream and the downstream
flowmeters. A digital flowmeter measures flow upstream from the
capsule, and the resultant value is sampled by a data-acquisition
system at 0.1 Hz and stored to hard disk. Core body (rectal), skin, and other temperatures are also sampled at 0.1 Hz and stored. The resultant
data arrays are downloaded to a desktop computer for statistical and
graphic analysis. The flowmeter has a special calibration showing
accuracy of ±0.4% in the flow range usually used (0-100
ml/min).
Pickup capsule. The flowmeter is
connected to a pickup capsule (Fig. 3) with
convoluted and corrugated Teflon fluorinated ethylene propylene
(FEP) tubing with connectors of thick-wall Teflon tubing.
Plastic luer fittings on the tubing mate to the manifolds of the pickup
capsule or to a 30-cm Teflon coil, which is used periodically to check
baseline chiller bath conditioning. The pickup capsule was milled from
clear acrylic, is held together with screws, and is affixed to the skin
by double-sided tape and medical-grade adhesive dressing. No force or
pressure was therefore necessary. To prevent leaks, care needed to be
taken not to distort the skin of the subject when affixing and
maintaining the capsule. Air enters the capsule through four holes
(0.1-cm diameter) on one side of the collecting chamber, passes over
the skin site, then exits through four holes (0.1-cm diameter) in the
facing side. This arrangement, designed for turbulence, produces a
well-mixed sample. The pickup capsule weighs 9.3 g; has external
dimensions of 3.5 × 2.8 × 1.2 cm; covers an exposed skin
area 1.97 × 0.97 cm, yielding a collection area of 1.91 cm2; and has a chamber volume of
1.55 cm3. There is sufficient wall
thickness (0.4 cm) on the collecting chamber to allow it to be
comfortably attached to the subject. With a flow of 100 ml/min, the
average air velocity across the skin inside the chamber is 0.04 m/s.
Fig. 1.
Flow schematic of key system components. From
left to
right (as air flows through system)
are input of room air to chiller bath; upstream flowmeter; pickup
capsule; measurement chamber with dew-point temperature
(Tdp) sensor; downstream
flowmeter; and controlled constant flow suction to pull conditioned air
through the system. Hydrophobic tubing (bold lines between components) is used between preconditioning and
Tdp sensor sites. Dew-point, environmental, and infant temperatures, along with airflow rate values,
are captured and stored by data-acquisition/computer.
[View Larger Version of this Image (56K GIF file)]
Fig. 2.
Diagram of chiller bath. Room air is pulled into a copper coil at
top of its spiral (a) and passes
through a coil chilled by an ice slurry (b) and down to a petri dish
(c), which has a pool of water at its bottom. After passing over the
pool, conditioned air is pulled up through Teflon tubing (d) and to an
upstream flowmeter.
[View Larger Version of this Image (51K GIF file)]
Fig. 3.
Top (A) and side
(B) views of pickup capsule,
machined from clear acrylic. Air from chiller bath flows into capsule
through a manifold, through holes in 1 side of capsule, is turbulent
over skin site, then passes out through holes on facing side into
another manifold and out to Tdp
sensor. Site area for this particular sensor is 2 cm2.
[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]
2 · min
1)
determinations for each second of the recording. Based on the data
provided by the manufacturer, the temperature resolution and
repeatability of the sensor is ±0.05°C and the absolute
accuracy is ±0.25°C. An on-line system-accuracy check is
obtained by measuring the Tdp of
the air from the stabilizing chiller bath at the beginning and end of
each run. With a loop of Teflon in place of the pickup capsule,
Tdp should equal 0.0°C. In
operation, as a routine calibration check of the system, the first
Tdp observed is of that of the conditioned air from the chiller bath.
System characteristics were quantified by a number of tests and analyses that investigated the steady-state calibration accuracy and response to an abrupt change in input.
Calibration accuracy. A gravimetric
calibration procedure was used to determine the accuracy of the system.
A device with a constant air-water interface ("wet block") was
constructed to assess system performance. The wet block design is shown
schematically in Fig. 4. The pickup capsule
is held in place on an aluminum plate stage over a water reservoir
within an acrylic block during a test run. The aluminum stage, with an
intervening rubber gasket, covers the top of a cavity in the block and
is secured by screws. The stage has an opening that is filled with
cotton and that has a tail extending into the water reservoir. The
cotton provides a wet surface, level with the stage surface, which is
maintained by water wicked from the reservoir. The surface of the stage
is smooth and provides a leak-free surface for the pickup capsule. This
arrangement allows continuous evaporation to take place from the top of
the wick without substantially changing the air-water interface, in
contrast to evaporation from a drop of water or wetted piece of paper.
The block was weighed on an electronic analytic balance just before and
just after test periods. Typical weight loss was ~0.065 g. The wet
block was at room temperature (~20°C), yielding
EWLc rates of ~0.15
mgH2O · cm
2 ·
min
1, which is within the
expected range of rates for measurements in patients (0.017-1
mgH2O · cm
2 ·
min
1). Data were recorded
over test periods of ~210 min, downloaded to a desktop computer, and
integration of the second-to-second EWLc rates yielded "system
EWLc," i.e., total calculated
EWLc system water loss. These
values were compared with the "weighed EWL"; i.e., the weight
loss of the wet block during the measurement period.
Representative results. The wet-block test data in the following Table 1 are those achieved with the final design of the EWL measurement system. Note the repeatability over long intertest intervals.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Based on these data sets, the measurement uncertainty of the system is within the theoretical estimation (see Appendix).
Response characteristics. The
transient response of the system depends on the void volume within the
system and the thermal time constant of the sensor. The void volume
depends on the volumes of the pickup capsule and
Tdp measuring chamber and on the
length and diameter of the connecting tubing. With 1 m of tubing, the system's flow time constant (volume divided by flow rate) is ~20 s.
The humidity sensor's characteristic time is ~15 s. Overall, the
system requires ~80 s to complete its response to a step change (Fig.
5A).
Figure 5B is a
y-axis magnification of the baseline test condition. Figure 5,
C-E, shows the results
of bench testing to elucidate the response characteristics of the
system. Multiple sequential inflation and deflation cycles of a water
droplet under the pickup capsule were done at different cycle lengths
(20-, 40-, and 60-s durations). The detection of periodicities appears to be valid for cycles on the order of tens of seconds.
2 · min
1);
C-E,
traces in response to sequential step changes at different period
lengths. Step changes were done by inflating or deflating a water
droplet within the pickup capsule. Time required to inflate or deflate
droplet was <2 s, and the volume of water moved was ~15 µl.
Multiple sequential inflation and deflation cycles were done at
different cycle lengths. C = 20 s (10 s inflated and 10 s deflated); D = 40 s; and E = 60 s cycle lengths. Note
attenuation of signal at the 20-s cycle length and enhancement of
signal at longer cycle lengths. E
shows a starting point of ~0.125
mgH2O · cm
2 · min
1
and ending point of ~0.025
mgH2O · cm
2 · min
1.
In vivo examples. Figures
6 through 8 show examples from a recording
from a 13-wk-old healthy male full-term infant in a study evaluating
the relationship between sleep state and
EWLc. Figure 6 is from a
representative 3.5-h recording showing the 0°C
Tdp condition at the start and the
end of the session. Figures 7 and 8 show
additional time-related clinical examples of
EWLc rates measured with this
system. Figure 7 shows a rapid increase in EWLc after the subject was exposed
to 20 min of warming. Figure 8 shows
cyclical patterns in the same subject. Further analysis and
interpretation of these clinical phenomena will follow in a future
publication. We believe the variations in
EWLc are real and that the system
allows the examination of dynamic changes in
EWLc rate.
The rate of TEWL from skin depends on four primary factors: 1) the subcutaneous skin temperature; 2) the permeability of the skin to diffusion of water vapor; 3) the mass transfer coefficient between the skin and the ambient air; and 4) the concentration of water vapor in the ambient air. Any measurement system that affects these parameters will likely alter TEWL and, hence, alter EWL. Ideally, the measured EWL should represent the undisturbed value of EWL. The subcutaneous temperature and the skin permeability are patient and situation specific and may, in fact, be the objective of a measurement series. The mass transfer coefficient depends on the mean velocity and turbulence intensity in the airflow around the skin. The ambient humidity is part of the patient-care environment. The clinical examples provided in this report are estimates of EWLc from chest and back sites; however, estimates for the total body could be obtained by sampling from multiple sites (11). Estimates of the boundary layer characteristics in infant and adult patients suggest that the TEWL of healthy full-term infants and of adults with healthy skin is only slightly affected by air velocity. The overall resistance to water loss is the sum of two resistances: that of the stratum corneum and that of the boundary layer above the skin (inversely proportional to the mass transfer coefficient). For healthy full-term infants and adults with healthy skin, substantially all of the overall resistance to TEWL lies in the stratum corneum, with the boundary layer resistance contributing only 5-10% of the total. The mass transfer coefficient varies approximately with the square root of the air velocity. A change of 50% in the air velocity would decrease the mass transfer coefficient by only 25%. Thus an increase in the air velocity by 50% would change the TEWL by <2.5%. The other component of EWL, active sweating, represents water loss by direct evaporation from liquid water on the surface of the skin. Whereas the evaporation rate of an existing droplet is directly proportional to the mass transfer coefficient, the rate at which the droplets are produced is set by the thermoregulatory mechanisms of the patient.
In this communication, we have described a system that can measure EWL
with an accuracy of ±2%, based on gravimetric calibration, and has
the capability of detecting periodicities on the order of tens of
seconds associated with sweating. The system is not affected by
environmental changes (e.g., temperature, humidity, and air currents)
and has the advantage of measuring
EWLc during steady-state and
dynamic changes in evaporative water loss rate with minimal disruption
to the subject. The modifications described are the result of
attempting to use existing techniques and finding significant
limitations for the study of steady-state and dynamic changes in EWL
during multihour studies of infants. In pediatrics, many clinical
investigations have utilized resistance hygrometry (Evaporimeter) (20,
22, 25, 29). The Evaporimeter uses the water vapor concentration
gradient within a hollow cylindrical placed perpendicular to the skin
surface to determine evaporative water loss. This measurement condition
changes the local evaporation rate by introducing extra resistance due
to the height of the cylinder. This technique was investigated by
Wheldon and Monteith (30), who concluded that the Evaporimeter would
underestimate "true" water loss by 10% when indicating 20 gH2O · m
2 · h
1
and by 60% or more at rates of ~80
gH2O · m
2 · h
1.
Blichmann and Serup (5) quote the manufacturer's accuracy statement as
"±15% or 2 gH2O · m
2 · h
1,
whichever is larger" and report tests showing the "technical accuracy" (in vitro calibration under carefully controlled
conditions) to be ±3.3%. Their in vivo results showed
reproducibility, same location on the same subject, between ±6.3
and ±14.5%, depending on the time between successive measurements.
This in vivo experience was corroborated by the studies of Smit et al.
(27), who reported 13.5% (same day) and 15.1% (consecutive days)
intraindividual coefficients of variation.
A recent technique developed by Graichen et al. (10) uses a Peltier module device (Bi-Tronics Dewpoint Sensor, model BI-102). This technique held the expectation for rapid and accurate measurements, but after using it for some months we found that it fell short of our needs. In this method, the sample capsule receives ambient air from the environment adjacent to the capsule, resulting in sampling site vapor mixed with vapor of unknown humidity composition. Nilsson (20) described the problems that must be solved if a ventilated chamber system was to work: 1) precise measurement of the humidity of the inlet and exit streams; 2) thoughtful selection of the flow rate, to match the normal mass transfer coefficient; 3) susceptibility to leakage; and 4) possible physiological interferences if too much force was applied to prevent leaks. The problem of obtaining a precise measurement of the humidity of the BI-102 inlet air was addressed by instituting a 2-m piece of tubing that allowed us to pull presample vapor from a more removed site. The instrument was unusable in conditions in which the dew point is <2°C, an ambient condition that can occur in our environment. It also had no capability for detection of leaks in the system, and the cable connecting the Peltier module to the main console had substantial torque, which made maintenance of an adequate leak-free measurement condition difficult.
In our system, two flowmeters are used to detect leaks, allowing corrective action and documentation of nonoptimal measurement conditions. The air inlet to the pickup capsule is a set of small jets, which increases mixing inside the pickup capsule to simulate a "well-stirred reactor." This ensures that mass transfer from the skin can be evaluated between the surface concentration at the skin and the mixed mean concentration in the capsule. With the assumption of a well-stirred reactor, the mass transfer is related to the difference between the mixed mean concentration in the chamber and the surface concentration. The mixed mean concentration in the pickup capsule is the value that is measured by the Tdp sensor. With the above problems addressed, significant improvements in precision and accuracy in the measurement of TEWL were possible.
Advantages of our system include 1)
continuous long-term recording capability;
2) excellent accuracy and
repeatability in dynamic testing; 3)
excellent precision; 4) minimal
susceptibility to environmental perturbation compared with other
devices, e.g., Evaporimeter and Dew-Point Hygrometer;
5) calibration checks at beginning
and end of data acquisition; 6) leak
detection; 7) maintenance of
integrity of sample quasi-bolus; and
8) standardization of measurement
conditions. Some limitations of our system are as follows:
1) additional control systems would
be necessary to run the system in high
EWLc rate conditions occurring in
a cool testing situation (i.e., over ~1.167
mgH2O · cm
2 ·
min
1 at ~75°F);
2) tubing to patient could be
restrictive (or could be dislodged) in an ambulatory or vigorously
active patient; 3) slight delay
(~80 s for a step change) in determinations; and 4) at present, nonambient
measurement conditions.
In summary, the accuracy of this system, based on gravimetric calibration, is ±2% and stable to environment disturbance (e.g., changes in temperature, humidity, and air currents). The system has the advantage of examining steady-state and dynamic changes in evaporative water loss rate with minimal disturbance of the subject. Therefore, it is very suitable for studies on the development of the thermoregulatory effector responses and the effect of sleep development or sleep state on those responses.
We thank Don Doucet (General Eastern Instruments) for suggestions on sample preconditioning; Wolfgang Jung (Dept. of Physics, Stanford Univ.) and John Wallace (National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center) for assistance in design and manufacture of components; and Margaret Boeddiker (Dept. of Pediatrics, Stanford Univ.) for assistance with this project.
Address for reprint requests: R. L. Ariagno, Dept. of Pediatrics, Stanford Univ. School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5119.
Received 15 November 1995; accepted in final form 28 October 1996.
Equations for Calculation of EWL
(
s 2)
|
s 2 is the
mass flux of water from the skin surface (in
mgH2O · cm
2 · min
1);
is volume flow of mixture at the upstream
flowmeter (in l/min); A is skin area
exposed inside the pickup capsule (in
cm2);
SH2 is specific humidity
downstream of the pickup capsule (in mgH2O/mgair);
SH1 is specific humidity upstream
of the pickup capsule (in
mgH2O/mgair);
and 1204.7 is density of dry air at STP (in
mgair/l).
The value of SH1 is set by the equation of state of water and the design of the inlet conditioning tank. Its value is known a priori and will be considered to have negligible uncertainty.
The equations used treat the mixture density at the flowmeter location as a constant, equal to that of air at standard conditions of temperature and pressure. Because flowmeters are essentially in equilibrium with the room air temperature, this seems a reasonable assumption.
Uncertainty
The uncertainty in measured values of
s 2 has been
estimated following the method of Kline and McClintock (18) as expanded by Moffat (19). The following form is used, which neglects the uncertainty and level of SH1
|

/
to be ±0.02
based on manufacturer's specifications. The uncertainty in area arises
not so much from the geometric problem of measuring the area but from
the question of deformation of the skin inside the capsule in response
to the applied force holding the capsule in place and the slight
suction force exerted by the negative pressure in the cavity. We
estimate
A/A
to be ±0.02.
The remaining factor is
SH2/SH2.
We estimate this from the uncertainty in the measured
Tdp temperature (±0.02°C),
by using a polynomial curve fit to the relationship between SH and
Tdp. Based on that curve fit
|
|
|
Then
| Tdp | SH |
SH/SH |
| 0 | 6 × 10 6 |
0.016 |
| 10 | 10 × 10 6 |
0.013 |
| 20 | 16 × 10 6 |
0.011 |
The overall uncertainty in
s 2 is,
therefore, a slight function of the operating
Tdp
| Tdp 2 | ![]() s 2 / s 2 |
| 0 | 3.3% |
| 10 | 3.1% |
| 20 | 3.0% |
These estimates reflect uncertainty in the measurement but do not
assess whether the act of measurement altered the patient's behavior.
The uncertainty reflects the effect on the calculated
s 2 associated
with the measurements of Tdp, flow
rate, and area.
| 1. | Amoros, C., J. C. Sagot, J. P. Libert, and V. Candas. Sweat gland response to local heating during sleep in man. J. Physiol. (Paris) 81: 209-215, 1986. [Medline] |
| 2. | Anderson, C. E., M. P. Wailoo, and S. A. Petersen. Keeping babies warm: have we got it right? Health Visit 62: 372-373, 386, 1989. |
| 3. | Azaz, Y., P. J. Fleming, M. Levine, R. McCabe, A. Stewart, and P. Johnson. The relationship between environmental temperature, metabolic rate, sleep state, and evaporative water loss in infants from birth to three months. Pediatr. Res. 32: 417-423, 1992. [Medline] |
| 4. |
Bach, V.,
B. Bouferrache,
O. Kremp,
Y. Maingourd,
and
J. P. Libert.
Regulation of sleep and body temperature in response to exposure to cool and warm environments in neonates.
Pediatrics
93:
789-796,
1994.
|
| 5. | Blichmann, C. W., and J. Serup. Reproducibility and variability of transepidermal water loss measurement: studies on the Servo Med Evaporimeter. Acta Dermato-Venerol. 67: 206-210, 1987. [Medline] |
| 6. | Darnall, R. A. J., and R. L. Ariagno. The effect of sleep state on active thermoregulation in the premature infant. Pediatr. Res. 16: 512-514, 1982. [Medline] |
| 7. |
Day, R.
Regulation of body temperature during sleep.
Am. J. Dis. Child.
61:
734-746,
1941.
|
| 8. | Fleming, P. J., R. Gilbert, Y. Azaz, P. J. Berry, P. T. Rudd, A. Stewart, and E. Hall. Interaction between bedding and sleeping position in the sudden infant death syndrome: a population based case-control study. Br. Med. J. 301: 85-89, 1990. |
| 9. | Fleming, P. J., M. R. Levine, Y. Azaz, R. Wigfield, and A. J. Stewart. Interactions between thermoregulation and the control of respiration in infants: possible relationship to sudden infant death. Acta Paediatr. Suppl. 389: 57-59, 1993. |
| 10. |
Graichen, H.,
R. Rascati,
and
R. R. Gonzalez.
Automatic dew-point temperature sensor.
J. Appl. Physiol.
52:
1658-1660,
1982.
|
| 11. | Hammarlund, K., G. E. Nilsson, P. A. Oberg, and G. Sedin. Transepidermal water loss in newborn infants. I. Relation to ambient humidity and site of measurement and estimation of total transepidermal water loss. Acta Paediatr. Scand. 66: 553-562, 1977. [Medline] |
| 12. | Hammarlund, K., B. Stromberg, and G. Sedin. Heat loss from the skin of preterm and fullterm newborn infants during the first weeks after birth. Biol. Neonate 50: 1-10, 1986. [Medline] |
| 13. | Harpin, V. A., G. Chellappah, and N. Rutter. Responses of the newborn infant to overheating. Biol. Neonate 44: 65-75, 1983. [Medline] |
| 14. | Harpin, V. A., and N. Rutter. Sweating in preterm babies. J. Pediatr. 100: 614-619, 1982. [Medline] |
| 15. |
Haskell, E. H.,
J. W. Palca,
J. M. Walker,
R. J. Berger,
and
H. C. Heller.
Metabolism and thermoregulation during stages of sleep in humans exposed to heat and cold.
J. Appl. Physiol.
51:
948-954,
1981.
|
| 16. |
Henane, R.,
A. Buguet,
B. Roussel,
and
J. Bittel.
Variations in evaporation and body temperatures during sleep in man.
J. Appl. Physiol.
42:
50-55,
1977.
|
| 17. |
Kahn, A.,
C. Van de Merckt,
M. Dramaix,
P. Magrez,
D. Blum,
E. Rebuffat,
and
L. Montauk.
Transepidermal water loss during sleep in infants at risk for sudden death.
Pediatrics
80:
245-250,
1987.
|
| 18. | Kline, S. J., and F. A. McClintock. Describing uncertainties in single sample experiments. Mech. Eng. Jan.: 3-8, 1953. |
| 19. | Moffat, R. J. Contributions to the theory of single sample uncertainty analysis. Trans. ASME J. Fluids Eng. 104: 173-178, 1982. |
| 20. | Nilsson, G. E. Measurement of water exchange through skin. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 15: 209-218, 1977. [Medline] |
| 21. | Ogawa, T., T. Satoh, and K. Takagi. Sweating during night sleep. Jpn. J. Physiol. 17: 135-148, 1967. [Medline] |
| 22. | Pinnagoda, J., R. A. Tupker, P. J. Coenraads, and J. P. Nater. Comparability and reproducibility of the results of water loss measurements: a study of 4 evaporimeters. Contact Dermatitis 20: 241-246, 1989. [Medline] |
| 23. |
Rutter, N.,
and
D. Hull.
Water loss from the skin of term and preterm babies.
Arch. Dis. Child.
54:
858-868,
1979.
|
| 24. | Scher, M. S., S. G. Dokianakis, M. Sun, D. A. Steppe, R. D. Guthrie, and R. J. Sclabassi. Rectal temperature changes during sleep state transitions in term and preterm neonates at postconceptional term ages. Pediatr. Neurol. 10: 191-194, 1994. [Medline] |
| 25. | Sedin, G., K. Hammarlund, G. E. Nilsson, B. Stromberg, and P. A. Oberg. Measurements of transepidermal water loss in newborn infants. Clin. Perinatol. 12: 79-99, 1985. [Medline] |
| 26. | Sedin, G., K. Hammarlund, and B. Stromberg. Transepidermal water loss in full-term and pre-term infants. Acta Paediatr. Scand. Suppl. 305: 27-31, 1983. [Medline] |
| 27. | Smit, H. A., J. Pinnagoda, R. A. Tupker, J. Burema, P. J. Coenraads, and J. P. Nater. Variability in transepidermal water loss of the skin: evaluation of a method to assess susceptibility to contact dermatitis in epidemiological studies. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 62: 509-512, 1990. [Medline] |
| 28. | Stanton, A. N., D. J. Scott, and M. A. Downham. Is overheating a factor in some unexpected infant deaths? Lancet 1: 1054-1057, 1980. [Medline] |
| 29. |
Vernon, H. J.,
A. T. Lane,
L. J. Wischerath,
J. M. Davis,
and
M. A. Menegus.
Semipermeable dressing and transepidermal water loss in premature infants.
Pediatrics
86:
357-362,
1990.
|
| 30. | Wheldon, A. E., and J. L. Monteith. Performance of a skin evaporimeter. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 18: 201-205, 1980. [Medline] |
| 31. | Wilson, D. R., and H. I. Maibach. Transepidermal water loss in vivo. Premature and term infants. Biol. Neonate 37: 180-185, 1980. [Medline] |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |