Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 81: 2244-2249, 1996;
8750-7587/96 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tyler, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rose, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tyler, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rose, R. J.

Journal of Applied Physiology
Vol. 81, No. 5, pp. 2244-2249, November 1996
EXERCISE AND MUSCLE

Changes in maximum oxygen uptake during prolonged training, overtraining, and detraining in horses

Catherine M. Tyler, Lorraine C. Golland, David L. Evans, David R. Hodgson, and Reuben J. Rose

Department of Animal Health, Department of Animal Science, University of Sydney, Rural Veterinary Centre, Camden, New South Wales 2570, Australia

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Tyler, Catherine M., Lorraine C. Golland, David L. Evans, David R. Hodgson, and Reuben J. Rose. Changes in maximum oxygen uptake during prolonged training, overtraining, and detraining in horses. J. Appl. Physiol. 81(5): 2244-2249, 1996.---Thirteen standardbred horses were trained as follows: phase 1 (endurance training, 7 wk), phase 2 (high-intensity training, 9 wk), phase 3 (overload training, 18 wk), and phase 4 (detraining, 12 wk). In phase 3, the horses were divided into two groups: overload training (OLT) and control (C). The OLT group exercised at greater intensities, frequencies, and durations than group C. Overtraining occurred after 31 wk of training and was defined as a significant decrease in treadmill run time in response to a standardized exercise test. In the OLT group, there was a significant decrease in body weight (P < 0.05). From pretraining values of 117 ± 2 (SE) ml · kg-1 · min-1, maximal O2 uptake (VO2 max) increased by 15% at the end of phase 1, and when signs of overtraining were first seen in the OLT group, VO2 max was 29% higher (151 ± 2 ml · kg-1 · min-1 in both C and OLT groups) than pretraining values. There was no significant reduction in VO2 max until after 6 wk detraining when VO2 max was 137 ± 2 ml · kg-1 · min-1. By 12 wk detraining, mean VO2 max was 134 ± 2 ml · kg-1 · min-1, still 15% above pretraining values. When overtraining developed, VO2 max was not different between C and OLT groups, but maximal values for CO2 production (147 vs. 159 ml · kg-1 · min-1) and respiratory exchange ratio (1.04 vs. 1.11) were lower in the OLT group. Overtraining was not associated with a decrease in VO2 max and, after prolonged training, decreases in VO2 max occurred slowly during detraining.

time course; overload training


INTRODUCTION

MAXIMAL OXYGEN UPTAKE (VO2 max) in horses can increase by up to 25% in response to training (1, 6-8, 17, 34). Increases in VO2 max have been shown to occur rapidly, with the relative intensity of training not affecting the increase over a 6- or 9-wk training period (6, 17). However, there is limited information on the potential for increase in VO2 max, because the maximum training period studied has been only 12 wk, and there have been no studies on the time course of changes in VO2 max.

The VO2 max of horses is at least twice that of humans on a mass-specific basis (9, 28), with a mean value of 154 ml · kg-1 · min-1 reported in racing Thoroughbreds (26). However, the response to training in untrained humans, in terms of increases in VO2 max, is of a similar magnitude to that in horses, with reported increases in VO2 max commonly between 10 and 20% (12, 14, 15, 22, 29, 30, 32).

Detraining is reported to result in a rapid decrease in VO2 max in horses, with VO2 max returning to pretraining values after 2-3 wk of inactivity (17). Another study reported that a 3-wk period of detraining produced a decline in peak oxygen uptake (VO2) to values close to their pretraining levels (1). The rapid decline in VO2 max found in horses appears to be similar to that occurring in human athletes, where VO2 max begins to fall within days of the commencement of detraining, despite the length and intensity of training (19, 23). However, another study found no reduction in VO2 max in horses detrained for a period of 15 wk (3).

Overtraining syndrome has been recognized as a significant problem for elite athletes for many years (11, 18, 33), and it has also been recognized in racehorses as a major cause of poor performance (2, 24, 25). Although there have been fewer investigations in horses than in humans, the syndrome appears to have similar manifestations, with poor performance accompanied by physiological and/or behavioral signs. These signs include chronic fatigue, increased heart rates and blood lactate concentrations during standardized submaximal exercise protocols, unwillingness to train, poor appetite, weight loss, and gastrointestinal and/or respiratory problems (2, 24, 25). "Overload training" has been used to describe the process of overtraining, whereas "overtraining" is reserved for use in describing the syndrome of poor performance and accompanying signs (11). In the current study, we have used the term "overload training" as the term for the training process involving periods of intense exercise and compensation.

Overtraining syndrome has been shown to affect VO2 in human athletes. This may be seen as a higher VO2 at submaximal workloads, due to a higher oxygen cost of exercise (18), and may be associated with unaltered (4) or decreased (16) VO2 max.

The aim of the study was to develop a suitable model of overtraining syndrome for the purposes of this study. We hypothesized that prolonged intense training in horses would result in an upper limit to the increase in VO2 max, and that signs of overtraining would be associated with a decrease in VO2 max. Furthermore, that following prolonged training there would be a slow decrease in VO2 max with detraining.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirteen standardbred geldings, 3-5 yr old and weighing 421 ± 10 (SE) kg, were used in a controlled, longitudinally designed training study. The horses presented in the current study were all young racehorses that had been trialed and/or raced with varying athletic ability. While none of the horses were of an elite class of athletes, at the conclusion of training, they all had indexes of exercise capacity comparable to an average standardbred racehorse (27).

Before the commencement of the study, horses were acclimated to exercising on the treadmill and to wearing a respiratory gas-collection mask, after which they were detrained (rested on pasture) for at least 4 mo. All training and exercise tests took place on a high-speed treadmill (Mustang, Kagra, Switzerland) at a 10% slope. Principles of laboratory animal care (the NIH "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals," [DHEW Publication No. (NIH) 86-23, revised 1985, Office of Science and Health Reports, DRR/NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892] were followed, and approval of the University of Sydney Animal Ethics Committee was obtained for the experiment.

Training was divided into four phases. Phase 1, or the endurance phase, consisted of 7 wk of endurance training, 5 days/wk. This consisted of a warm-up of 1,000 m at 4 m/s (4.2 min) followed by exercise at 6 m/s (intensity ~60% VO2 max) over distances up to 4,000 m (11.1 min) daily. Phase 2, or the high-intensity phase, consisted of 9 wk of moderate-intensity training 3 days/wk and of high-intensity training 2 days/wk. Moderate-intensity training consisted of a warm-up of 1,000 m at 4 m/s followed by training at 8 m/s (intensity ~80% VO2 max) for a distance of 3,000 m/day (6.25 min). High-intensity training consisted of a warm-up of 1,000 m at 4 m/s followed by 2-min intervals at speeds of ~10 m/s (intensity of 100% VO2 max) up to a total of 6 min/day (total daily distance of ~3,600 m).

In phase 3, or the overload training phase, the horses were divided into two groups: overload training (OLT) and control (C). The OLT group exercised at higher intensities, more frequently, and for longer durations than group C, with increasing intensities and distances until signs of overtraining were observed, in week 31, or after 15 wk of this phase of training. Overtraining was defined as a significant (P < 0.05) decrease in treadmill run time during a standardized exercise test. Horses continued training for 1 wk after the onset of signs of overtraining to allow completion of the testing procedures and measurements. A further exercise test was then performed 2 wk later, after a relative reduction in workload, and overtraining was confirmed by continued significantly decreased run time, compared with results before signs of overtraining were observed.

The OLT group performed high-intensity training 3 days/wk and moderate-intensity training 3 days/wk, whereas the C group performed high-intensity training 2 days/wk and moderate-intensity training 3 days/wk. Both the OLT and C groups performed a run to fatigue at 110% VO2 max on one of the high-intensity training days every week throughout the OLT phase. The run time was recorded but was found to be too variable for use in detecting a decrease in run time with overtraining. Instead, the incremental exercise test, which had a lower coefficient of variation, was found to be a better indicator of overtraining.

For the first 11 wk of phase 3, the OLT group performed a rapidly increasing protocol of moderate- and high-intensity training similar to phase 2. Moderate-intensity training consisted of a warm-up of 1,000 m at 4 m/s followed by training at 8 m/s (intensity ~80% VO2 max) for a distance of up to 6,000 m/day (12.5 min). High-intensity training consisted of a warm-up of 1,000 m at 4 m/s followed by 2-min intervals at speeds of ~10 m/s (intensity of 100% VO2 max) up to a total of 16 min/day (total daily distance of ~9,600 m). After this period, it was evident that the horses were not showing signs of overtraining, and so the protocol was altered to allow for greater intensity of exercise to be introduced to the OLT group. High-intensity training for the OLT group consisted of a warm-up of 1,000 m at 4 m/s followed by intervals of high-intensity exercise equivalent to 110% VO2 max until signs of fatigue. Horses exercised for up to ~9,000 m (in intervals of ~800 m). This was equivalent to an average interval time of ~60 s, and ~10-15 intervals were able to be completed by each horse in each training period. Moderate-intensity training for the OLT group also increased in intensity, and the warm-up was followed by training at 9 m/s [~85% VO2 max) over 6,000 m daily (11.1 min)].

The C group continued training as for the high-intensity phase for the same 16-wk period. The amount of exercise was increased slowly in the C group to maintain the training stimulus. High-intensity training included 2-min intervals at 100% VO2 max that increased from a total of 6 min (average distance ~3,600 m) to 8 min/day (average distance ~5,000 m), and the distances covered during moderate-intensity training (~80% VO2 max) increased from 3,000 to 4,500 m/day (6.25-9.4 min). During the 2-wk period of reduced workload, the C group performed the same amount of exercise as the OLT group. Phase 4, or the detraining phase, consisted of a period of 12-wk rest, with horses confined to yards.

The VO2 max was measured every 2-3 wk during the 34 wk of training and at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 wk of detraining by using a standardized incremental exercise test (8). The test consisted of 2-min warm-up at 4 m/s followed by 1-min increments at increasing speeds (6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13 m/s) until fatigue. Fatigue was determined as the point at which the horse was unable to keep pace with the treadmill despite encouragement. Total run time for the test was recorded and was used as an objective indicator of overtraining. An open-flow gas-collection system was used for collection of expired gas samples over the last 15 s of each speed increment. Measurements of VO2, carbon dioxide production (VCO2), and the respiratory exchange ratio (R) during the exercise test were performed as described previously (5). Flow rates of ~7,000 l/min were used during the experiment, and were measured by using the nitrogen dilution technique (10). The gas-collection system had a volume of 218 liters, and at the flow rate used the time delay between the horses' expiration and the collection of the sample was 1.9 s. VO2 max was confirmed in all horses by demonstrating no increase in VO2 between the last two steps of the exercise test. Maximal VCO2 and R were defined as the highest values reached during the test. The coefficient of variation for repeated determinations of VO2 max was 3.5% (5). The coefficient of variation for run time during the incremental exercise test was calculated.

To determine the speeds corresponding to different relative intensities of training exercise, horses were subjected to an additional submaximal incremental exercise test at least 3 h after the VO2 max test was performed to determine the linear relationship between VO2 and speed at various submaximal exercise speeds (7). With linear regression analysis, using the method of least squares, individual regression values were calculated, and from these values the speeds at which each horse would be exercising at 100 and 110% VO2 max were determined (21).

Results during training and detraining were compared by using a one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance with time as a repeated-measures factor. Results when overtraining occurred during phase 3 were compared by using a two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance with training group an independent variable and time a repeated-measures factor. Post hoc tests of least significant difference were performed where F-values were significant (P < 0.05). Results are presented as means ± SE.


RESULTS

In both groups, VO2 max increased throughout training (Fig. 1). From pretraining values of 117 ± 2 ml · kg-1 · min-1, VO2 max increased by 15% (P < 0.01) in phase 1 to 135 ± 1 ml · kg-1 · min-1. By the end of phase 2, VO2 max values were 140 ± 2 ml · kg-1 · min-1, 20% (P < 0.01) higher than pretraining values. At the onset of signs of overtraining at the end of the overload training period, VO2 max values were 151 ± 2 ml · kg-1 · min-1, 29% (P < 0.01) higher than pretraining values, and there was no significant difference between the C and OLT groups (P > 0.05). In the last 4 wk of training, there was no significant difference between VO2 max values over time. Power calculations were made and showed that there was an 80% chance of detecting a difference of 4.8 ml · kg-1 · min-1.


Fig. 1. Maximal O2 uptake (VO2 max) values (means ± SE) for control (6 horses) and overload training (7 horses) groups during 3 phases of training (31 wk), overtraining (OT) (3 wk), and detraining phase 4 (12 wk).
[View Larger Version of this Image (36K GIF file)]

There was no significant reduction in VO2 max until after 6 wk detraining, by which time VO2 max had decreased by 6% (137 ± 2 ml · kg-1 · min-1), and after 12 wk detraining the VO2 max had decreased by 8% (134 ± 2 ml · kg-1 · min-1) from values at the end of training (P < 0.01). However, VO2 max was still 15% higher than values before training (P < 0.01). Power calculations showed that there was an 80% chance of detecting a difference of 4.3 ml · kg-1 · min-1. The difference in VO2 max between the end of training and 4 wk detraining was 3.8 ml · kg-1 · min-1, and the power of detecting this difference was only 68%.

The OLT group had a significant reduction in run time at the onset of overtraining in weeks 31 and 32 (P < 0.05), and this reduction was maintained after 2 wk of reduced workload, in week 34 (Fig. 2). The coefficient of variation of run time was 3.96%. Although there was no significant change in VO2 max at the onset of overtraining (Fig. 1), there was a significant reduction in the maximum values for VCO2 and R. The maximum values for VCO2 (147 vs. 159 ml · kg-1 · min-1) and R (1.04 vs. 1.11) were significantly (P < 0.02) lower in the OLT group than group C. Results for run time, VO2 max, peak VCO2, and peak R are presented in Table 1.


Fig. 2. Run times (means± SE) during a standardized exercise test during phase 3 of training (overreaching phase) for control (6 horses) and overload training (7 horses) groups. * Significant (P < 0.05) differences between control and overload training groups.
[View Larger Version of this Image (59K GIF file)]

Table 1. Values for run time, VO2 max, VCO2 peak, and Rpeak for control and overload training groups during training, (34 wk), and detraining (12 wk)


Week of Training Run Time, s
 VO2 max, ml · kg-1 · min-1
 VCO2 peak, ml · kg-1 · min-1
Rpeak
C OLT C OLT C OLT C OLT

1 115 ± 2  119 ± 3  128 ± 4  132 ± 3  1.13 ± 0.01  1.16 ± 0.01 
3 333 ± 11  324 ± 5  126 ± 3  128 ± 3  143 ± 5  145 ± 4  1.22 ± 0.03  1.17 ± 0.02 
5 337 ± 8.4  348 ± 7  132 ± 3  134 ± 1  152 ± 5  155 ± 2  1.19 ± 0.03  1.22 ± 0.01 
8 135 ± 2  134 ± 2  148 ± 3  152 ± 2  1.11 ± 0.02  1.16 ± 0.02 
10 350 ± 10  343 ± 6  141 ± 3  140 ± 3  152 ± 3  149 ± 7  1.10 ± 0.02  1.14 ± 0.01 
12 347 ± 11  362 ± 6  139 ± 2  139 ± 2  149 ± 3  152 ± 2  1.09 ± 0.01  1.11 ± 0.01 
15 139 ± 2  141 ± 3  153 ± 4  155 ± 2  1.11 ± 0.02  1.13 ± 0.01 
17 339 ± 8  336 ± 5  138 ± 2  139 ± 2  150 ± 4  155 ± 2  1.12 ± 0.02  1.14 ± 0.01 
19 348 ± 11  345 ± 6  139 ± 3  138 ± 3  152 ± 5  148 ± 3  1.15 ± 0.02  1.10 ± 0.01 
22 350 ± 13  347 ± 7  142 ± 2  145 ± 2  159 ± 4  154 ± 3  1.12 ± 0.02  1.11 ± 0.02 
26 351 ± 13  352 ± 6  139 ± 5  143 ± 1  154 ± 5  156 ± 2  1.16 ± 0.01  1.13 ± 0.01 
29 344 ± 9  326 ± 7  145 ± 3  147 ± 2  160 ± 4  152 ± 3  1.13 ± 0.02  1.07 ± 0.02 
31 339 ± 14  316 ± 4  150 ± 2  151 ± 3  166 ± 3  153 ± 4  1.14 ± 0.01  1.04 ± 0.03 
32 346 ± 7  308 ± 9  147 ± 2  143 ± 4  159 ± 2  147 ± 3  1.11 ± 0.02  1.05 ± 0.01 
34 339 ± 11  291 ± 8  144 ± 3  139 ± 4  159 ± 3  137 ± 7  1.12 ± 0.01  0.995 ± 0.03 
36 337 ± 9  310 ± 12  142 ± 3  142 ± 3  160 ± 3  149 ± 5  1.14 ± 0.02  1.07 ± 0.02 
38 324 ± 9  290 ± 7  143 ± 3  137 ± 2  160 ± 5  146 ± 5  1.14 ± 0.02  1.08 ± 0.02 
40 321 ± 9  294 ± 11  138 ± 3  136 ± 1  149 ± 3  147 ± 2  1.10 ± 0.01  1.10 ± 0.01 
42 323 ± 6  291 ± 8  140 ± 1  136 ± 3  159 ± 2  150 ± 6  1.16 ± 0.01  1.12 ± 0.03 
46 328 ± 7.5  296 ± 10  137 ± 3  131 ± 2  152 ± 3  136 ± 5  1.14 ± 0.02  1.08 ± 0.04

Values are means ± SE. C, control (6 horses); OLT, overload training (7 horses) groups. Run times are not included for weeks 1, 8, and 15, since an additional submaximal 1-min increment was included in the rest. VO2 max, maximal O2 uptake; VCO2 peak, peak CO2 consumption; Rpeak, peak respiratory exchange ratio.

There was a significant (P < 0.05) decrease in body weight from 425 ± 10 kg in week 24 to 411 ± 9 kg at the onset of overtraining in week 31 (Fig. 3). In comparison, the C group maintained a body weight of 423 ± 14 kg from week 24 to 423 ± 14 kg in week 31. Although there was no objective measurement of behavior, subjectively, it was noted that horses in the OLT group became more difficult to handle during the period of overtraining than the control group, with signs of irritability and unwillingness to commence and complete training sessions.


Fig. 3. Body weight values (means ± SE) during phase 3 of training (overreaching phase) for control (6 horses) and overload training (7 horses) groups. * Significant (P < 0.01) differences between control and overload training groups.
[View Larger Version of this Image (62K GIF file)]


DISCUSSION

This is the first study to have developed a suitable model of overtraining in horses. A previous study had failed to sufficiently achieve a model, as there was no control group and no statistically significant reduction in performance in a standardized exercise test (2). In the current study, the proof of overtraining is in the combination of a significant reduction in body weight and reduction in performance, which was measured as a reduction in run time during a standardized incremental exercise test. Overtraining was confirmed by continued reduction in performance after a period of reduced workload. The coefficient of variation for run time using this technique was only 4%. Although the overtraining was diagnosed in week 32, based on a significant reduction in run time for the group, retrospectively, it was evident that individual horses had a reduction in run time in week 29 and more in weeks 31 and 32. Thus, while a group effect was evident only in weeks 31 and 32, the onset of signs of overtraining may have occurred earlier in individual horses.

This is the first long-term study of changes in VO2 max with training in horses, and it was surprising to find that VO2 max continued to increase throughout training. The total increase was 29% above pretraining values, with about one-half of the increase and the most rapid increase occurring in the first 7 wk of endurance training. The increase in VO2 max was greater than has been previously described in training studies involving horses. Reported increases in VO2 max have ranged from 10% (17) to 23% (8), and peak VO2 has been reported to increase by 25% (1). However, the present study involved 34 wk of training, compared with 6-12 wk in the previous reports. The training program used in this study was of a longer duration and used higher intensities of training than in other treadmill studies (1, 8, 17). Horses trained at a constant exercise load for 6 wk, at intensities of either 40 or 80% VO2 max and had a 10% increase in VO2 max at either intensity after 2 wk of training but thereafter there were no further increases (17). While horses trained with an increasing exercise load for 7 wk, they had a 23% increase in VO2 max at the end of training (8). Despite the durations being relatively short compared with studies in human athletes, the training regimen was much more demanding for the horses than would be expected at commercial training establishments where traditional training methods were used (20).

When results of studies in humans and horses are compared, the percent increases due to training in VO2 max of untrained subjects are similar and depend on the level of physical activity before the start of the training program. Saltin and colleagues (29) found a 33% increase in VO2 max in previously sedentary subjects after a 50-day training period but only a 4% increase in subjects who were previously physically active after the same training period. Despite the range of increases in VO2 max with training in humans, most studies have shown a ~10-20% increase in VO2 max with training in previously untrained or detrained people (12, 14, 15, 22, 29, 30, 32).

There have been relatively few studies on the time course of increases in VO2 max in humans. Hickson and colleagues (13) found a linear increase in VO2 max during 10 wk of strenuous endurance training when the training stimulus increased throughout training. Mikesell and Dudley (22), during a similar training program, found that the linear increase in VO2 max was maintained for only 5 wk, with a decline in the 6th wk. However, the latter study had begun with well-conditioned distance runners who may have been closer to their limit of increase in VO2 max than the untrained subjects in the first study. In a longer study of 36 wk, VO2 max increased for the first 24 wk of endurance training but showed no further increase over the final 12 wk of training (32). From the results of these studies, it appears that the time course of changes in VO2 max of humans and horses is similar, as there was almost a linear increase in VO2 max in the first 10 wk of the current study and no significant increase after 28 wk of training (Fig. 1).

Whether the increase in VO2 max occurring in horses in the current study is close to the maximum extent of increase could not be determined from this study. VO2 max continued to increase over the final phase of training, but in the last 4 wk this was not significant. However, the power to detect the increase of ~5 ml · kg-1 · min-1 was only 80%. It is possible that training for >34 wk would have led to continued increases in VO2 max.

Overtraining did not affect VO2 max, but maximal VCO2 and R were both lower in the OLT group at the onset of overtraining, presumably because of the lowered run time in the overtraining group. The cause of the reduction in run time may be due to physiological (metabolic) or psychological causes. The reduced maximal values for VCO2 and R in the OLT group at overtraining indicate that it is unlikely that increased lactate accumulation and metabolic acidosis were the cause of the reduced run time. Lactate accumulation has been postulated as a possible physiological factor in overtraining (18, 24). Glycogen depletion has been shown to cause decreases in maximal VCO2 and R during exercise in humans (31) and may have been a factor in the overtrained group of horses.

The pathophysiology of overtraining remains unclear, with psychological factors complicating physiological factors. It may well be that overtraining is a largely psychological syndrome, where there is fatigue and poor performance despite little change in VO2 max, one of the major indexes of exercise capacity.

In a previous study, there was a rapid decrease in VO2 max in horses, with values not significantly different from pretraining levels by 2 wk of detraining (17). In the current study, there was no significant reduction in VO2 max during the first 4 wk of detraining. While VO2 max values after 12 wk of detraining were 8% lower than peak training values, they were still 15% above those before training. This indicates a much slower decrease in VO2 max than has been described in human athletes (19, 23) and horses (17) but agrees with the results of Henriksson and Reitman (12), who found that VO2 max was not significantly different from the level at the end of training after 6-wk detraining in humans. Butler and colleagues (3) found no significant change in VO2 max with 15-wk detraining in horses, despite an apparent decrease in mean VO2 max values between fully fit horses and 15-wk detraining of 11%. The reason that the apparent decrease was not significant may have been that there were only four horses in the study. Also, the detraining period was simply described as 15 wk of relative inactivity where horses were walked for 20 min each day, which may have been enough exercise to maintain VO2 max. Studies on human athletes have found that, once peak fitness has been achieved, even a small amount of exercise during the detraining period would maintain VO2 max (14, 23). In our study, horses were confined to yards and only tested every 2 wk for the first 8 wk of detraining and at 12 wk of detraining.

The slow decrease in VO2 max after prolonged training has implications for the loss of aerobic fitness and performance in horses in training, which may need a period of rest due to injury or disease. If horses have been in training for a long period, a 4- to 6-wk rest may not have adverse effects on aerobic capacity. Such horses may be able to resume training at a higher training level more rapidly and return more quickly to racing. However, there have been no studies on the effects of detraining on bone density and soft tissues such as tendons.

Conclusion. In this study, VO2 max continued to increase during prolonged training. However, the increase in VO2 max may be close to the possible limit of increase in VO2 max in standardbred horses, as VO2 max did not increase over the last 4 wk of this study despite increases in exercise intensity and duration. A suitable model for the development of overtraining syndrome in horses has been developed in this study. Signs of overtraining were not associated with changes in maximal aerobic power, but lower values were noted for maximal values for VCO2 and R, probably due to a lower run time in the OLT group. After prolonged training, decreases in maximal aerobic power occurred slowly during detraining, and after 12 wk of detraining VO2 max values remained 15% above pretraining values.


FOOTNOTES

Address for reprint requests: R. J. Rose, Rural Veterinary Centre, PMB 4, Werombi Rd., Camden NSW 2570, Australia.

Received 11 December 1995; accepted in final form 10 July 1996.


REFERENCES

1. Art, T., and P. Lekeux. Training-induced modifications in cardiorespiratory and ventilatory measurements in Thoroughbred horses. Equine Vet. J. 25: 532-536, 1993.
2. Bruin, G., H. Kuipers, H. A. Keizer, and G. J. Vander Vusse. Adaptation and overtraining in horses subjected to increasing training load. J. Appl. Physiol. 76: 1908-1913, 1994.
3. Butler, P. J., A. J. Woakes, L. S. Anderson, K. Smale, C. A. Roberts, and D. H. Snow. The effect of cessation of training on cardiorespiratory variables during exercise. In: Equine Exercise Physiology, edited by S. G. B. Persson, A. Lindholm, and L. B. Jeffcott. Davis, CA: ICEEP Publications, 1991, vol. 3, p. 71-76.
4. Costill, D. L. Peaking for performance. In: Inside Running. Indianapolis, IN: Benchmark, 1986, p. 123-132.
5. Eaton, M. D., D. L. Evans, D. R. Hodgson, and R. J. Rose. Maximal accumulated oxygen deficit in Thoroughbred horses. J. Appl. Physiol. 78: 1564-1568, 1995.
6. Evans, D. L., J. E. Rainger, D. R. Hodgson, M. D. Eaton, and R. J. Rose. The effects of intensity and duration of training on blood lactate concentrations during and after exercise. Equine Vet. J. Suppl. 18: 422-425, 1995.
7. Evans, D. L., and R. J. Rose. Maximum oxygen uptake in racehorses: changes with training state and prediction from submaximal cardiorespiratory measurements. In: Equine Exercise Physiology, edited by J. R. Gillespie, and N. E. Robinson. Davis, CA: ICEEP Publications, 1987, vol. 2, p. 52-67.
8. Evans, D. L., and R. J. Rose. Cardiovascular and respiratory responses to submaximal exercise training in the Thoroughbred horse. Pfluegers Arch. 411: 316-321, 1988.
9. Evans, D. L., and R. J. Rose. Determination and repeatability of maximum oxygen uptake and other cardiorespiratory measurements in the exercising horse. Equine Vet. J. 20: 94-98, 1988.
10. Fedak, M. A., L. Rome, and H. J. Seeherman. One-step N2-dilution technique for calibrating open-circuit VO2 measuring systems. J. Appl. Physiol 51: 772-776, 1981.
11. Fry, R. W., R. Morton, and D. Keast. Overtraining in athletes; an update. Sports Med. 12: 32-65, 1991.
12. Henriksson, J., and J. S. Reitman. Time course of changes in human skeletal muscle succinate dehydrogenase and cytochrome oxidase activities and maximal oxygen uptake with physical activity and inactivity. Acta Physiol. Scand. 99: 91-97, 1977.
13. Hickson, R. C., A. Bomze, and J. O. Holloszy. Linear increase in aerobic power induced by a strenuous program of endurance exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 42: 372-376, 1977.
14. Hickson, R. C., C. Kanakis, Jr., J. R. Davis, A. M. Moore, and S. Rich. Reduced training duration effects on aerobic power, endurance, and cardiac growth. J. Appl. Physiol. 53: 225-229, 1982.
15. Hoppeler, H., H. Howald, K. Conley, S. L. Linstedt, H. Claassen, P. Vock, and E. R. Weibel. Endurance training in humans: aerobic capacity and structure of skeletal muscle. J. Appl. Physiol. 59: 320-327, 1985.
16. Kindermann, W. Das uebertraining-ausdruck einer vegetativen fehlsteuerung. Dtsch. Z. Sportmed. 8: 238-245, 1986.
17. Knight, P. K., A. K. Sinha, and R. J. Rose. Effects of training intensity on maximum oxygen uptake. In: Equine Exercise Physiology, edited by S. G. B. Persson, A. Lindholm, and L. B. Jeffcott. Davis, CA: ICEEP Publications, 1991, vol. 3, p. 77-82.
18. Kuipers, H., and H. A. Keizer. Overtraining in elite athletes: review and directions for the future. Sports Med. 6: 79-92, 1988.
19. Lacour, J. R., and C. Denis. Detraining effects on aerobic capacity. Med. Sport Sci. 17: 230-237, 1984.
20. Lovell, D. Training Standardbred trotters and pacers. In: The Athletic Horse, edited by D. R. Hodgson, and R. J. Rose. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1994, p. 399-408.
21. Medbø, J. I., A. C. Mohn, I. Tabata, R. Bahr, O. Vaage, and O. M. Sejersted. Anaerobic capacity determined by the maximal accumulated O2 deficit. J. Appl. Physiol. 64: 50-60, 1988.
22. Mikesell, K. A., and G. A. Dudley. Influence of intense endurance training on aerobic power of competitive distance runners. Med. Sci. Sports Exercise 16: 371-375, 1984.
23. Neufer, P. D. The effect of detraining and reduced training on the physiological adaptations to aerobic exercise training. Sports Med. 8: 302-320, 1989.
24. Persson, S. G. B. Analysis of fitness and state of training: evaluation of exercise tolerance and fitness in the performance horse. In: Equine Exercise Physiology, edited by D. H. Snow, S. G. B. Persson, and R. J. Rose. Cambridge, UK: Granata, 1983, p. 470-486.
25. Persson, S. G. B., M. Larsson, and A. Lindholm. Effects of training on adrenal-cortical function and red-cell volume in trotters. Zentralbl. Veterinaermed. Reihe A 27: 261-268, 1980.
26. Rose, R. J., D. K. Hendrickson, and P. K. Knight. Clinical exercise testing in the normal Thoroughbred horse. Aust. Vet. J. 67: 345-351, 1990.
27. Rose, R. J., C. M. King, D. L. Evans, C. M. Tyler, and D. R. Hodgson. Indices of exercise capacity in horses presented for poor racing performance. Equine Vet. J. Suppl. 18: 418-421, 1995.
28. Saltin, B., and P.-O. Åstrand. Maximal oxygen uptake in athletes. J. Appl. Physiol. 23: 353-358, 1967.
29. Saltin, B., G. Blomqvist, J. H. Mitchell, R. L. Johnson, K. Wildenthal, and C. B. Chapman. Response to exercise after bed rest and after training. Circulation 7: 1-78, 1968.
30. Saltin, B., and L. B. Rowell. Functional adaptations to physical activity and inactivity. Federation Proc. 39: 1506-1513, 1980.
31. Segal, S. S., and G. A. Brooks. Effetcs of glycogen depletion and workload on postexercise O2 consumption and blood lactate. J. Appl. Physiol. 47: 514-521, 1979.
32. Smith, D. A., and T. V. O'Donnell. The time course during 36 weeks' endurance training of changes in VO2 max and anaerobic threshold as determined with a new computerized method. Clin. Sci. Lond. 67: 229-236, 1984.
33. Stone, M. H., R. E. Keith, J. T. Kearney, S. J. Fleck, G. D. Wilson, and N. T. Triplett. Overtraining: a review of the signs, symptoms and possible causes. J. Appl. Sport Sci. Res. 5: 35-50, 1991.
34. Thornton, J. R., K. F. Dowsett, R. Mann, and D. A. V. Bodero. Influence of anabolic steroids on the response to training of 2-year-old horses. In: Equine Exercise Physiology, edited by S. G. B. Persson, A. Lindholm, and L. B. Jeffcott. Davis, CA: ICEEP Publications, 1991, p. 503-508.

0161-7567/96 $5.00 Copyright © 1996 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
E. de Graaf-Roelfsema, P. P. Veldhuis, H. A. Keizer, M. M. E. van Ginneken, K. G. van Dam, M. L. Johnson, A. Barneveld, P. P. C. A. Menheere, E. van Breda, I. D. Wijnberg, et al.
Overtrained horses alter their resting pulsatile growth hormone secretion
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2009; 297(2): R403 - R411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
I. D. Wijnberg, K. G. van Dam, E. d. Graaf-Roelfsema, H. A. Keizer, M. M. E. van Ginneken, A. Barneveld, E. v. Breda, and J. H. van der Kolk
(Over)training effects on quantitative electromyography and muscle enzyme activities in standardbred horses
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2008; 105(6): 1746 - 1753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
J. G. Swallow, J. S. Rhodes, and T. Garland Jr.
Phenotypic and Evolutionary Plasticity of Organ Masses in Response to Voluntary Exercise in House Mice
Integr. Comp. Biol., June 1, 2005; 45(3): 426 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tyler, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rose, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tyler, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rose, R. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online