Journal of Applied Physiology Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 81: 1978-1986, 1996;
8750-7587/96 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tantucci, C.
Right arrow Articles by Sorbini, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tantucci, C.
Right arrow Articles by Sorbini, C. A.

Journal of Applied Physiology
Vol. 81, No. 5, pp. 1978-1986, November 1996
EXERCISE AND MUSCLE

Ventilatory response to exercise in diabetic subjects with autonomic neuropathy

C. Tantucci, P. Bottini, M. L. Dottorini, E. Puxeddu, G. Casucci, L. Scionti, and C. A. Sorbini

Clinica di Semeiotica Metodologia Medica, University of Ancona, Ospedale Regionale Torrette, Ancona 60020; and Istituto di Medicina Interna e Scienze Endocrine e Metaboliche, University of Perugia, Perugia 06100, Italy

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Tantucci, C., P. Bottini, M. L. Dottorini, E. Puxeddu, G. Casucci, L. Scionti, and C. A. Sorbini. Ventilatory response to exercise in diabetic subjects with autonomic neuropathy. J. Appl. Physiol. 81(5): 1978-1986, 1996.---We have used diabetic autonomic neuropathy as a model of chronic pulmonary denervation to study the ventilatory response to incremental exercise in 20 diabetic subjects, 10 with (Dan+) and 10 without (Dan-) autonomic dysfunction, and in 10 normal control subjects. Although both Dan+ and Dan- subjects achieved lower O2 consumption and CO2 production (VCO2) than control subjects at peak of exercise, they attained similar values of either minute ventilation (VE) or adjusted ventilation (VE/maximal voluntary ventilation). The increment of respiratory rate with increasing adjusted ventilation was much higher in Dan+ than in Dan- and control subjects (P < 0.05). The slope of the linear VE/VCO2 relationship was 0.032 ± 0.002, 0.027 ± 0.001 (P < 0.05), and 0.025 ± 0.001 (P < 0.001) ml/min in Dan+, Dan-, and control subjects, respectively. Both neuromuscular and ventilatory outputs in relation to increasing VCO2 were progressively higher in Dan+ than in Dan- and control subjects. At peak of exercise, end-tidal PCO2 was much lower in Dan+ (35.9 ± 1.6 Torr) than in Dan- (42.1 ± 1.7 Torr; P < 0.02) and control (42.1 ± 0.9 Torr; P < 0.005) subjects. We conclude that pulmonary autonomic denervation affects ventilatory response to stressful exercise by excessively increasing respiratory rate and alveolar ventilation. Reduced neural inhibitory modulation from sympathetic pulmonary afferents and/or increased chemosensitivity may be responsible for the higher inspiratory output.

diabetes; pulmonary denervation; control of breathing; breathing pattern


INTRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES in humans on the role of the pulmonary autonomic nervous system on the modulation of the breathing pattern during stimulated ventilation were invasive (vagal blockade) (16, 17) or limited to the trachea and large bronchi (airway anesthesia) (36, 40). Because of these technical limitations, data were sparse and sometimes conflicting. In investigating heart-lung transplanted patients, some investigators have recently claimed that pulmonary neurogenic mechanisms essentially influence the level, but not the pattern, of ventilation during exercise (23), although both tidal volume (VT) (2, 13) and respiratory rate (RR) (2, 13, 23) exhibited a steeper increase in these patients compared with normal subjects. Conversely, another study (33) in similar patients, who were compared only with heart transplant recipients without a matched group of normal subjects, seems to indicate that during exercise pulmonary nerves are more important in regulating the breathing pattern (deeper and slower in heart-lung transplanted patients) than is the absolute level of ventilation.

Apart from the disruption of bronchial circulation and pulmonary lymphatics, heart-lung transplanted patients frequently have chronic muscle deconditioning due to long-term pretransplant debilitation (39) and may also have a restrictive ventilatory defect (23). Moreover, despite the indirect evidence provided for the persistence of pulmonary denervation after transplantation (1, 23), reinnervation several months from surgery cannot be completely ruled out (12, 26). All of these findings may be confusing factors when heart-lung transplant recipients are regarded as a unique model of pulmonary autonomic denervation to be compared with normal subjects for analysis of the ventilatory response during exercise.

These patients, however, do not constitute the sole model of pulmonary autonomic denervation in humans, since a defect of the autonomic nervous system is not uncommon in diabetes mellitus (15); indeed, in the study of the ventilatory response to exercise, diabetic patients with autonomic neuropathy may provide a simple model of chronic pulmonary autonomic denervation (8, 35).

In the attempt to further investigate the role of the autonomic system on ventilatory response to exercise, a group of diabetic subjects suffering from moderate to severe autonomic neuropathy was studied during stressful exercise.

Our results suggest that diabetic autonomic dysfunction is associated with a greater ventilatory response to exercise. Although this finding can be partially explained by the increment of dead space (VD) ventilation and by a faster RR, a progressively higher inspiratory activity is likely to be involved, as indicated by a steeper relationship for mouth occlusion pressure and alveolar ventilation against exertional CO2 production (VCO2). Increased CO2 chemosensitivity or decreased autonomic (probably sympathetic) inhibitory influence on the central drive could represent the main mechanism underlying the abnormally elevated inspiratory output observed in these patients.

Possible problems with diabetic neuropathy as a model for pulmonary denervation are fully considered in DISCUSSION.


METHODS

Subjects. Twenty male diabetic patients, 10 without and 10 with diabetic autonomic neuropathy, henceforth referred to as Dan- and Dan+, respectively, were recruited from the Istituto di Medicina Interna e Scienze Endocrine e Metaboliche, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Perugia and were enrolled in the study after giving fully informed consent. The protocol was approved by the local ethics committee and was in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients were on insulin treatment with four daily insulin injections (regular insulin before each meal and intermediate-acting insulin at bedtime). No drugs likely to interfere with the pulmonary or cardiovascular function were taken by the patients. Autonomic neuropathy was assessed by means of the standard battery of cardiovascular tests (14); each test was scored according to the literature (5), and patients were considered positive for autonomic neuropathy if the total score was >= 4. Five out of 10 Dan+ patients had severe postural hypotension with upright fall in systolic blood pressure of >30 mmHg. Postural hypotension is thought to be the consequence of impaired splanchnic vasoconstriction due to overt sympathetic damage of the autonomic nervous system.

In the Dan+ group, two patients had preproliferative retinopathy and one patient had proliferative retinopathy; four of the ten Dan- patients had background retinopathy. Four Dan- patients had microalbuminuria, whereas in the Dan+ group microalbuminuria was detected in five patients and proteinuria in three. In regard to the symptoms related to the autonomic dysfunction, only one Dan+ patient complained of nocturnal watery diarrhea.

No patient reported respiratory symptoms at the time of the study, and all had normal physical examination, electrocardiogram, and chest radiography. None of the patients studied was suffering from anemia or had signs or symptoms of endocrine or metabolic diseases other than diabetes. All were normotensive, and none had evidence of ischemic heart disease or S-T segment depression during previous submaximal or symptom-limited incremental exercise. To exclude dilated or restrictive cardiomyopathy and valvular heart disease, all patients underwent a bidimensional echocardiographic study. Left ventricular systolic or diastolic dysfunction was not observed at rest, and morphological and/or functional valvular abnormalities were absent. Despite the presence of diabetic nephropathy in some patients, none suffered from renal failure at the time of the study.

Ten male normal subjects recruited from the University staff, matched for age and weight, were studied as the control group.

Study design. Patients and control subjects had pulmonary function tests, including determination of maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV) and measurements of maximal inspiratory (MIP) and expiratory (MEP) mouth pressures. Spirometry, flow-volume curves, lung volumes (by the multiple-breath nitrogen washout technique), single-breath diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) adjusted for hemoglobin, and MVV were performed with the subjects in a sitting position while wearing a noseclip and breathing through a mouthpiece on a Medical Graphics 1070 computerized system. MVV was measured according to the standard procedure (breathing as deeply and quickly as possible for 12 s), avoiding RR values of >40 breaths/min.

The predicted values for volumes and flows were those proposed by the European Community for Coal and Steel (28).

Measurements of MIP and MEP, sustained for >= 1 s, were obtained in triplicate at functional residual capacity (FRC), by using a differential pressure transducer (±300 cmH2O, Validyne). The mean of the two best efforts was considered for analysis. Volume-corrected predicted values for MIP and MEP were those proposed by Cook et al. (9).

The resting ventilatory response to CO2 was determined in the morning using the rebreathing method of Read (29).

All three groups performed a submaximal (>= 90% of maximum predicted heart rate) or symptom-limited incremental exercise test, using a computer-driven electronically braked cycle ergometer (model KEM-3, Mijnhardt). After resting for 15 min, patients and control subjects sustained a 2-min period of loadless pedaling and then cycled at 60 revolutions/min with an incremental load of 0.33 W/s (20 W/min ramping). Exercise time ranged between 8 and 15 min to avoid too short as well as excessively long efforts. Patients and subjects breathed through a mouthpiece into a two-way breathing valve of 100 ml of VD while wearing a noseclip. The expiratory air flow was measured by a pneumotachograph and the expired volume was obtained integrating for the time while the air was continuously sampled at the mouth to determine inspiratory and expiratory (mixed and end-tidal) gas concentrations, which allowed a breath-by-breath analysis of minute ventilation (VE; BTPS), O2 consumption (VO2; STPD), VCO2 (STPD), VE/VO2 and VE/VCO2, and ventilatory timing parameters: RR, VT, inspiratory (TI) and expiratory (TE) times, and mean inspiratory flow (VT/TI) (CPX system, Medical Graphics). Predicted values for exercise parameters were those of Hansen et al. (18) for incremental exercise testing.

The physiological VD-to-VT ratio (VD/VT) was calculated using estimated arterial PCO2 (PaCO2) values derived from end-tidal PCO2 (PETCO2) according to PaCO2 = 5.5 + 0.9 × PETCO2 - 0.0021 × VT (18). The physiological VD was computed by the product of VD/VT and VT.

Effective alveolar ventilation (VA) was derived from VA = VE × (1 - VD/VT), and its relationship with VCO2 was used as an index of ventilatory drive that is independent of individual variations of VD/VT.

The gas-exchange anaerobic threshold (AT) (VO2 at AT) was determined by means of the computer-resident algorithm according to the V-slope method (4) or by eye (as a mean of the measurements made by 2 independent observers) when the automatically detected VO2 at AT was clearly erroneous.

Venous blood samples were drawn only from the diabetic subjects to measure lactate plasma levels at rest and at each minute of exercise. The samples were immediately placed on ice until centrifugation and measurements were performed. Analysis was carried out by enzymatic fluorometric continuous flow assay. For our laboratory, the normal value (mean and respective range) was 0.68 mmol/l (0.41-1.13 mmol/l). This procedure allowed the detection of the lactate AT (LAT) (VO2 at LAT) by plotting lactate concentration vs. VO2, according to a log-log model of data transformation. The intersection between the linear regression lines of the two-segment analysis of the transformed data defined the LAT on the VO2 axis (3).

Mouth pressure was monitored at rest and during exercise, and its value, computed at 100 ms after the beginning of an occluded inspiration (P0.1), was randomly obtained 4-5 times/min (38). Mouth pressure was measured by a pressure transducer (143PC03D Microswitch, Honeywell), and the signal, filtered and digitized with a sampling frequency of 200 Hz, was sent to an IBM personal computer for calculation of P0.1. The measurements of P0.1 were averaged to get a single value for each 30-s period.

Arterial O2 saturation was assessed by ear pulse oximeter (model 3700, Omeda Biox) and was continuously displayed on the computer monitor.

Conventional electrocardiogram monitoring was performed during the entire exercise test, and a 12-lead electrocardiograph tracing was printed every minute. The heart rate signal was also sent to the computer, and the O2 pulse (VO2/heart rate) could be obtained for each breath.

Hypoglycemia was carefully prevented in patients in the 24 h before the study by teaching them to self-administer the premeal and bedtime insulin doses so as to avoid premeal blood glucose levels of <5 mmol/l, based on capillary blood glucose measurements by chemistrips. Each exercise test was performed in the afternoon between 5:00 and 5:30 P.M., 5 h after the patients had their prelunch dose of regular insulin.

Analysis. To provide comparisons among groups at similar relative levels of physiological function, VE was normalized as a percentage of MVV (VE/MVV) and VT as a percentage of inspiratory capacity (IC) (VT/IC). These variables are referred to as adjusted VE and adjusted VT.

The means of lung function, exercise, and ventilatory timing variables of the three groups were compared by analysis of variance and by orthogonal comparisons adopting a two-tailed Student's t-test for unpaired data when allowed by analysis of variance. The linear correlations were calculated by the least squares method. Comparisons among groups of the mean slopes were performed according to the above-mentioned procedure. Data are expressed as mean ± SE. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.


RESULTS

Characteristics and lung function. Anthropometric and clinical data of diabetic and control subjects are shown in Table 1. Patients and control subjects were not significantly different for age, weight, and smoking habit. The long-term control of hyperglycemia was similar and satisfactory in both groups of patients.

Table 1. Anthropometric and clinical data of subjects and patients


Control Dan- Dan+

Age, yr 35.8 ± 6.2  43.0 ± 10.5  40.3 ± 7.6 
Weight, kg 78.3 ± 7.7  70.8 ± 9.6  71.4 ± 11.5 
Smoking habit, pack · yr 11.1 ± 10.3  11.6 ± 14.5  19.9 ± 16.3 
Duration of disease, yr 15.5 ± 5.6  20.0 ± 9.7 
HbA1c, %  7.1 ± 0.6  7.8 ± 1.9 
IDDM/NIDDM, no. 6/4 8/2
DAN score 0.6 ± 0.6  5.6 ± 1.4 
VC, % predicted 112.8 ± 11.6  110.8 ± 12.9  102.1 ± 14.4 
IC, % predicted 114.2 ± 7.0  104.1 ± 16.4  101.2 ± 15.1 
FRC, % predicted 102.0 ± 23.9  100.6 ± 21.0  98.8 ± 25.7 
RV, % predicted 107.5 ± 21.6  95.8 ± 16.7  99.2 ± 27.2 
TLC, % predicted 114.2 ± 12.0  102.4 ± 10.8  97.5 ± 15.4 
FEV1, % predicted 113.9 ± 10.6  104.7 ± 13.9  99.1 ± 16.8 
FEV1/FVC, %  81.0 ± 4.3  82.0 ± 5.2  83.3 ± 4.2 
FEF25-75, % predicted 94.3 ± 14.8  92.9 ± 26.9  93.3 ± 27.3 
DLCO/VA, % predicted 101.5 ± 15.7  89.9 ± 18.6  91.5 ± 16.9 
MVV, % predicted 104.1 ± 12.7  101.8 ± 15.1  102.8 ± 18.3 
MIP at FRC, % predicted 101.3 ± 15.5  135.7 ± 33.4  117.2 ± 37.3 
MIP at FRC, cmH2O 109.6 ± 17.0  123.1 ± 33.5  108.4 ± 29.5 
MEP at FRC, % predicted 129.2 ± 39.2  139.5 ± 43.7  137.6 ± 85.1 
MEP at FRC, cmH2O 169.6 ± 34.5  146.2 ± 36.6  136.9 ± 40.3

Values are means ± SE. Dan-, diabetic subjects without autonomic neuropathy; Dan+, diabetic subjects with autonomic neuropathy; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1 glycosylate (values in nondiabetic subjects: 3.8-5.5%); IDDM/NIDDM, insulin-/non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus; DAN, diabetic autonomic neuropathy; VC, vital capacity; IC, inspiratory capacity; FRC, functional residual capacity; RV, residual volume; TLC, total lung capacity; FEV, forced expiratory volume; FEF, forced expiratory flow; FEV1, FEV in 1 s; FEF25-75, 25-75% of FEF; DLCO, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide; VA, alveolar volume; MVV, maximal voluntary ventilation; MIP, maximal inspiratory pressure; MEP, maximal expiratory pressure.

Lung function tests, including MVV and DLCO, expressed as a function of the alveolar volume (VA) were in the normal range for both Dan- and Dan+ subjects and were not significantly different from those of control subjects. The indexes of respiratory muscle strength (MIP and MEP), reported both as absolute values and as percentages of predicted values, were also normal in the Dan- and Dan+ groups and were not dissimilar from those of control subjects.

Neuromuscular and ventilatory responses to progressive hypercapnic stimulation, assessed as a relationship of P0.1 and VE against PETCO2, respectively, were not different in Dan+ and control subjects and were 0.50 ± 0.10 vs. 0.46 ± 0.06 cmH2O/Torr for the P0.1/PETCO2 slope (not significant) and 3.71 ± 0.73 vs. 3.27 ± 0.35 l · min-1 · Torr-1 for the VE/PETCO2 slope (not significant).

Exercise performance. The maximum workload and VO2 at peak of exercise (here referred to as DLCO/VA) (VO2 max) achieved by the three groups are reported in Table 2. At peak of exercise, the workload, as percentage of predicted value, was not significantly different in the three groups. Instead, VO2 max was much lower in diabetic than in control subjects, both as absolute value and as percentage of predicted value. In this respect, although Dan+ subjects had a lower VO2 max as percentage of predicted value, compared with Dan-, the difference was not statistically significant. As absolute value of VO2, control subjects had the highest gas- exchange AT (VO2 at AT), which, in turn, was not different between the Dan- and Dan+ groups. VO2 at AT, expressed as a percentage of VO2 max, was higher in the Dan+ group.

Table 2. Workload, ventilation, and gas-exchange parameters of diabetic and control subjects at peak of exercise


Control Dan- Dan+

Workload maximum, W 187.0 ± 9.4* 153.3 ± 5.1  141.9 ± 8.0 
Workload maximum, % predicted 85.6 ± 3.0  85.9 ± 4.8  76.6 ± 4.3 
 VO2 max, ml/min 2,606 ± 133* 1,927 ± 102  1,737 ± 120 
 VO2 max, % predicted 92.6 ± 3.4dagger 80.7 ± 3.6  70.6 ± 4.3 
 VCO2 max, ml/min 3,013 ± 165dagger 2,476 ± 171  2,353 ± 165 
 VO2 at AT, ml/min 1,203 ± 53Dagger 951 ± 48  978 ± 73 
 VO2 at AT, % VO2 max 48.1 ± 1.9  49.7 ± 2.1  56.8 ± 2.5§
 VO2 at LAT, ml/min 884 ± 70  870 ± 93 
 VEmax, l/min 82.0 ± 4.2  73.5 ± 7.0  80.7 ± 5.3 
 VEmax/MVV, %  47.7 ± 2.4  47.8 ± 3.4  51.8 ± 3.7

Values are means ± SE. VO2, O2 consumption; VO2 max, maximal VO2; VCO2 max, maximal CO2 production; VE, minute ventilation; AT, gas-exchange anaerobic threshold; LAT, lactate anaerobic threshold. Significantly different compared with * Dan- and Dan+ (P < 0.001); dagger Dan- and Dan+ (P < 0.01); Dagger Dan-; § control and Dan- (P < 0.05).

The LAT (VO2 at LAT) was almost identical in the diabetic groups (Table 2). In addition, the exertional increment of lactate plasma levels was superimposable in the Dan- and the Dan+ subjects, as shown in Fig. 1.


Fig. 1. Exertional increase of plasma levels of lactate, measured at corresponding levels of O2 consumption (VO2) normalized for respective maximal (VO2 max), is shown for diabetic subjects with (Dan+) and without (Dan-) autonomic neuropathy. Data are mean ± SE. No differences are observed between the 2 groups.
[View Larger Version of this Image (12K GIF file)]

At peak of exercise, VCO2 was significantly greater in control than in diabetic subjects but was similar in Dan- and Dan+ subjects.

Two of the Dan+ subjects stopped the exercise test because of leg fatigue. None of the diabetic subjects suffered from hypoglycemia during the exercise.

Exercise ventilation. VE at peak of exercise was similar in the three groups both in absolute value and as a percentage of MVV (Table 2). The ventilatory response to increasing VCO2 was linear in all subjects (r values ranging from 0.98 to 0.99) (Fig. 2A). The slope of VE/VCO2 was 0.032 ± 0.002 ml/min in Dan+ and was steeper than that of both control (0.025 ± 0.001 ml/min; P < 0.001) and Dan- (0.027 ± 0.001 ml/min; P < 0.05) subjects.


Fig. 2. Data are mean ± SE. Symbols closest to origin represent resting values, and symbols farthest from origin represent highest values reached at peak of exercise. A: linear relationship between minute ventilation (VE) and CO2 production (VCO2) is steeper in Dan+ than in Dan- and control subjects (C). During exercise, VE at corresponding VCO2 values is significantly greater in Dan+ than in Dan- (* P < 0.05) and C (° P < 0.01) subjects. B: linear relationship between inspiratory neuromuscular drive (P0.1) and VCO2 is markedly increased in both diabetic groups with respect to C. During exercise, P0.1 at corresponding VCO2 values is significantly higher in Dan+ (** P < 0.01) and Dan- (* P < 0.05) than in C.
[View Larger Version of this Image (14K GIF file)]

The P0.1/VCO2 relationship was essentially linear in patients and control subjects during exercise (r values ranging from 0.90 to 0.99) and had a mean slope of 0.0031 ± 0.0002, 0.0049 ± 0.0005, and 0.0061 ± 0.0007 cmH2O · ml-1 · min-1 in control, Dan- (P < 0.05), and Dan+ (P < 0.002) subjects, respectively. Thus at corresponding exertional values of VCO2, P0.1 was progressively greater in the two groups of patients than in the control group (Fig. 2B).

The P0.1/VE relationship, which reflects the impedance of the respiratory system, is illustrated throughout the exercise in Fig. 3 for patients and control subjects.


Fig. 3. Data are means ± SE. Linear relationship between P0.1 and VE is depicted for Dan+, Dan-, and C during exercise. For corresponding VE values, P0.1 appears significantly lower in control (** P < 0.01) than in Dan+ subjects, whereas Dan- subjects show an intermediate behavior. Symbols closest to origin represent resting values and symbols farthest from origin represent highest values reached at peak of exercise.
[View Larger Version of this Image (16K GIF file)]

Even though the computed physiological VD/VT value was not significantly different at rest in the three groups, during exercise the rate of decrease of the physiological VD/VT in relation to adjusted ventilation was substantially lower both in Dan+ (0.0030 ± 0.0017%/%) and Dan- (0.0037 ± 0.0017%/%) compared with control (0.0050 ± 0.0023%/%) subjects (P < 0.05). The physiological VD/VT was significantly greater in both groups of patients than in the control group at progressively higher values of VE/MVV (Fig. 4A). This was mainly due to an abnormal exertional increase in physiological VD in the diabetic patients (Fig. 4B).


Fig. 4. Data are means ± SE. During exercise, dead space (VD)/tidal volume (VT) decreases less in diabetic than C subjects and, for corresponding values of adjusted VE (VE/maximal voluntary ventilation), VD/VT is significantly higher in Dan+ (** P < 0.02) and Dan- (* P < 0.05) than in C (A). In this respect, physiological VD becomes progressively more elevated in diabetic subjects during exercise (* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01) (B), whereas no significant differences are observed in increment of adjusted VT [VT/inspiratory capacity (IC)] during exercise and in VT/IC at corresponding VE/MVV values among the 3 groups (C). Conversely, increase in respiratory rate (RR) during exercise is greater in Dan+ than in Dan- and C, and RR, at corresponding VE/MVV values, is significantly higher in Dan+ (* P < 0.05) compared with both Dan- and C (D). br, Breaths.
[View Larger Version of this Image (68K GIF file)]

The relationship between computed VA and metabolic VCO2 during exercise increased progressively more in Dan+ subjects, whereas it remained almost identical at a lower level for the Dan- and control groups (Fig. 5). The slope of this relationship was 0.027 ± 0.001 l · min-1 · mmHg-1 in the Dan+ group and 0.023 ± 0.001 l · min-1 · mmHg-1 in both the control and Dan- groups (P < 0.01).


Fig. 5. Data are mean ± SE. During exercise, linear relationship between alveolar ventilation (VA) and VCO2 is steeper in Dan+ than in Dan- and C. For corresponding VCO2 values, VA is significantly greater in Dan+ (* P < 0.05), whereas Dan- and C have superimposable levels of VA throughout effort. Symbols closest to origin represent resting values, and symbols farthest from origin represent highest values reached at peak of exercise.
[View Larger Version of this Image (16K GIF file)]

At rest, PETCO2 was similar in all groups, amounting to 37.4 ± 0.7, 38.9 ± 0.7, and 38.0 ± 1.2 Torr in the control, Dan-, and Dan+ groups, respectively. The corresponding values of estimated PaCO2 were 37.5 ± 0.7, 38.8 ± 0.8, 38.1 ± 1.1 Torr in the control, Dan-, and Dan+ groups, respectively. Conversely, at peak of exercise PETCO2 was significantly lower in Dan+ than in control (P < 0.005) and Dan- (P < 0.02) subjects, amounting to 35.9 ± 1.6, 42.1 ± 0.9, and 42.1 ± 1.7 Torr in Dan+, control, and Dan- groups, respectively. The corresponding values of estimated PaCO2 were 33.5 ± 1.4, 37.6 ± 1.0, and 38.6 ± 1.7 Torr in Dan+, control (P < 0.005), and Dan- (P < 0.02) groups, respectively.

The resting hemoglobin O2 saturation was normal in the Dan-, Dan+, and control subjects (97.9 ± 1.5, 97.7 ± 1.6, and 98.5 ± 1.2%, respectively); O2 desaturation did not occur in any subject during the exercise.

Pattern of breathing. The rate of exponential increase of adjusted VT (VT/IC) during exercise was similar in the three groups (Fig. 4C).

On the contrary, the rate of RR linear increase during exercise was significantly higher in the Dan+ compared with the control and Dan- groups (P < 0.05), amounting to 0.52 ± 0.16 vs. 0.39 ± 0.14 and 0.36 ± 0.14 breaths/min, respectively (Fig. 4D). RR was similar at rest among the groups but faster at peak of exercise in the Dan+ patients (Table 3). Although TI and TE were significantly shorter at peak of exercise in Dan+ compared with Dan- and control subjects (Table 3), the rate of TI and TE decrease during exercise was not different among the groups.

Table 3. Breathing pattern at rest and peak of exercise


Control Dan- Dan+

VT, ml
  Rest 796 ± 203  800 ± 319  735 ± 155 
  Exercise 2,745 ± 641* 2,274 ± 505  2,070 ± 472 
RR, breaths/min
  Rest 15.3 ± 4.6  16.3 ± 3.9  16.9 ± 4.6 
  Exercise 30.4 ± 4.5  31.4 ± 8.5  40.3 ± 9.9dagger
VT/TI, ml/s
  Rest 436 ± 59  442 ± 143  446 ± 92 
  Exercise 2,717 ± 431  2,518 ± 763  2,801 ± 514 
TI, s
  Rest 2.07 ± 0.56  2.00 ± 0.94  1.74 ± 0.35 
  Exercise 1.01 ± 0.17  0.94 ± 0.18  0.76 ± 0.17dagger
TE, s
  Rest 2.23 ± 0.74  2.07 ± 0.60  2.24 ± 0.64 
  Exercise 0.95 ± 0.14  1.01 ± 0.27  0.79 ± 0.20dagger

Values are means ± SE. VT, tidal volume; RR, respiratory rate; TI, inspiratory time; TE, expiratory time. Significantly different compared with: * Dan+ (P < 0.05); dagger control and Dan- (P < 0.05).

There were no significant differences among control, Dan-, and Dan+ subjects in the rate of increase of mean inspiratory flow (VT/TI), which displayed similar values at rest and peak of exercise for the three groups (Table 3).


DISCUSSION

Before the results of the study are discussed, some problems with diabetic autonomic neuropathy as a model of pulmonary autonomic denervation should be pointed out.

It is implicit that the extent of the autonomic neuropathy and related pulmonary autonomic denervation cannot be exactly determined in patients in vivo.

Diabetic autonomic neuropathy is by definition a symmetric and distal neuropathy and produces diverse and somewhat selective neural alterations, both in the parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous systems (25). Their expression in diabetic subjects is inherently variable and supports the pathological findings of a frequently partial process. Therefore, our patients are expected to have an incomplete degree of autonomic denervation with differential effects on myelinated and unmyelinated fibers.

Autoptic findings in diabetic subjects with severe dysautonomy, however, have consistenly shown the presence of remarkable pathological alterations in the sympathetic ganglia and either in the vagus or sympathetic nerves, with predominant loss of myelinated fibers (11). In this respect, our patients were suffering from marked autonomic neuropathy, as demonstrated by the quantitative analysis of the reflex cardiovascular responses, the only widely accepted and standardized criteria to clinically assess the extent of the dysautonomy (5, 15).

Concerning the pulmonary involvement, it has been repeatedly observed that diabetic patients exhibit almost invariably some degree of functional impairment reflecting a specific damage to the airways autonomic innervation (8, 10, 19, 30, 35). In these patients, a significant correlation has also been found between cardiac and pulmonary (airways) indexes of autonomic neuropathy (8).

Thus we are aware that this model cannot assume complete pulmonary autonomic denervation but a wide clinical spectrum of autonomic dysfunction, with an inevitable heterogeneity within Dan+ patients regarding the prevalence of cholinergic or sympathoadrenergic damage of the autonomic nervous system in the whole body, including the lungs. On the other hand, this is a quite common clinical condition where a chronic, although incomplete, autonomic neuropathy is well recognized. In this context, we attempted to categorize our diabetic subjects and to score their autonomic neuropathy by state-of-the-art methods to select patients with a high degree of dysautonomy in whom previous reports predict an involvement of the pulmonary autonomic innervation (8, 10, 19, 30, 35).

The results of this study show that during stressful exercise VE increased progressively much more in diabetic subjects with autonomic neuropathy than in normal subjects, whereas diabetic subjects without autonomic neuropathy exhibited an intermediate behavior. The greater increase in VE in the Dan+ subjects was associated with an abnormally high increment of RR, without differences in the rise of the adjusted VT. Hence, Dan+ subjects had more elevated VE at corresponding VCO2 and faster RR values and comparable adjusted VT values at similar relative levels of ventilatory response. In addition, both groups of patients displayed a significantly lesser decrease in VD/VT throughout the effort than control subjects and consequently higher VD/VT values at similar relative levels of ventilatory response.

In line with studies performed in heart-lung transplanted patients (23, 31, 34), there were no differences in VE levels or indexes of breathing pattern at rest in Dan+ compared with Dan- and control subjects, which suggests that pulmonary neurogenic mechanisms are not important in determining the resting ventilatory pattern in humans.

VO2 max in both diabetic groups was significantly lower than in the control group. This is believed to reflect the interaction between the impaired cardiac performance and the skeletal muscle deconditioning observed in diabetes (20). Despite lower VO2 max and maximal VCO2 than in control subjects, at peak of exercise Dan- and Dan+ subjects attained similar VO2 and VCO2 values and had comparable levels of both VE and VE/MVV with respect to the control group.

As mentioned in RESULTS, the two diabetic groups, which had almost identical LAT values, achieved the gas-exchange AT at a lower absolute VO2 value than did the control group but at a similar or even higher percentage of VO2 max. Moreover, the changes in lactate plasma levels overlapped in the Dan- and the Dan+ groups throughout the exercise, as shown in Fig. 1. Therefore, exertional metabolic acidosis did not seem to occur earlier and/or to progress differently in our diabetic groups, and an increasingly larger accumulation of acids cannot account for the steeper relationship between VE (and P0.1) and VCO2 observed in Dan+ compared with Dan- subjects.

Lactate concentrations during exercise were not measured in our control subjects. It is conceivable, however, that exertional metabolic acidosis began later in this group, as suggested by the higher gas-exchange AT, and perhaps increased less rapidly. Thus we cannot exclude that the higher VE (and P0.1) values recorded at corresponding VCO2 levels in diabetic subjects compared with control subjects could in part be induced by metabolic acidosis. Despite a similar degree of metabolic acidosis in both groups of patients, however, VE was significantly greater in the Dan+ group, whereas it was only slightly higher in the Dan- than in the control group. Indeed, considering the higher VD/VT value in the Dan- than the control group, the contribution, if any, of acidosis on VE in diabetic subjects should be modest.

In fact, three mechanisms could better account for the higher ventilatory output for a given VCO2 observed during incremental exercise in diabetic patients affected by autonomic neuropathy: 1) the smaller reduction in VD/VT, 2) the greater increment of the RR, and possibly 3) an increased neural drive.

The relative increase in VD/VT in Dan+, at rest or during exercise, could be ascribed to the alterations in the bronchomotor tone resulting from bronchial cholinergic denervation (8), with an augmentation of the anatomic and, through ventilation-perfusion mismatch, alveolar VD. In our population, however, a similar lesser reduction in VD/VT during exercise occurred in both groups of patients, and therefore appears to be linked more to diabetes per se than to the autonomic dysfunction. An impaired cardiovascular response to exercise, irrespective of the presence of autonomic dysfunction, has been recently shown in diabetic patients and can be sustained by factors other than overt autonomic neuropathy, such as diabetic cardiomyopathy (6). Thus a reduced exertional increase in cardiac output, as suggested by the depressed VO2/work relationship found in both Dan- and Dan+ subjects during incremental effort (5), could impair the total lung perfusion and the distribution of pulmonary blood flow, inducing a lesser uniformity of the regional ventilation-perfusion relationships and a smaller reduction in the physiological VD and VD/VT.

The greater increment of RR observed in Dan+ compared with Dan- and control subjects could reflect the influence of the pulmonary autonomic (essentially cholinergic) nerve dysfunction on the ventilatory pattern, at least during stressful exercise. In this respect, our results contrast with those obtained in experimental animals, where vagotomy leads to an increase in VT and a decrease in RR, while maintaining TI/TT and VT/TI unchanged, both at rest and during exercise (7, 27). The suppression of the Hering-Breuer inflation reflex due to the lack of inputs from lung stretch receptors has been invoked as the main underlying mechanism. It is well known, however, that in humans the Hering-Breuer inflation reflex is rather weak and demonstrable only at high inflation volumes (17); hence, a smaller influence, if any, on the breathing pattern during stimulated ventilation would be expected in humans after a cholinergic nervous system damage in the lungs.

Several investigators have recently studied the effects of pulmonary denervation in heart-lung transplanted patients compared with matched control subjects (2, 23) or heart-transplanted patients (33). In general, these studies have shown that during exercise the RR, and sometimes also the VT, tend to increase more rapidly after the assumed severance of cholinergic lung innervation, in contrast with the slower and deeper breathing pattern observed in classic experiments in animals (2, 13, 23). Despite the completely different model of pulmonary denervation used in the present study, our results are in line with previous observations of abnormal increments of RR associated with relatively normal increases in VT in Dan+ patients during submaximal incremental exercise. Very similar findings have been reported by Kimoff et al. (23) in four heart-lung transplanted patients, although these investigators stressed that in normal humans autonomic pulmonary innervation has a more important role on the level of ventilation rather than on the ventilatory pattern and timing during exercise.

Pulmonary congestion can affect the breathing pattern both by reducing VT and by increasing RR. We cannot rule out pulmonary congestion as a cause of the observed tachypnea in Dan+ during exercise. In this situation, however, the effect on the RR should occur mainly in the last part of the exercise, together with a brisk reduction in VT. This was not the case in our Dan+ patients and, anyway, it would hardly have contributed to explain the different breathing frequency of Dan+ and Dan- patients, who showed similar impairment of the cardiovascular response to exercise (6).

Also, a higher respiratory drive could induce by itself an increased ventilatory output during exercise in Dan+ patients.

The progressively greater P0.1 recorded in these patients during exercise could be entirely explained by the need for a progressively larger VE, due to higher VD/VT and RR, and for a greater neuromuscular support for any given VE, as shown by the P0.1/VE relationship (Fig. 3). In fact, this relationship is slightly steeper and mostly shifted upward in Dan+ and even in Dan- compared with control subjects, probably because of minor mechanical constraints in diabetic subjects that do not alter lung function at rest while becoming crucial in the presence of larger ventilatory requirements (32).

On the other hand, when VA was computed in relation to increasing VCO2 during incremental effort to eliminate the confusing effects of the above-mentioned variables, a progressively larger amount of VA was found in Dan+ compared with both Dan- and control subjects, who, in turn, had identical VA/VCO2 relationships (Fig. 5).

The difference between the peak values of PETCO2 (and estimated PaCO2), which were significantly lower in Dan+ and very similar in Dan- and control subjects, is in line with a disproportionate increase in alveolar ventilation in Dan+ subjects. An excellent correlation has been found between PaCO2 and PETCO2 during exercise in normal subjects (37). Because all subjects had a normal resting ventilatory function, as shown by the pulmonary function tests, PETCO2 probably reflects well the PaCO2 values throughout the effort also in diabetic subjects, suggesting that Dan+ subjects were indeed hyperventilating in relation to their exertional VCO2.

An earlier and perhaps greater metabolic acidosis cannot be responsible of the higher VA and lower PETCO2 observed in Dan+ than in control subjects. If this had been the case, the peak PETCO2 value and the VA/VCO2 relationship would have been similar in Dan+ and Dan- subjects, who showed almost identical AT values and overlapping lactate concentrations during exercise (Table 2, Fig. 1).

In our opinion, this hyperventilation could reflect, although indirectly, an excessive respiratory drive, which could in part be responsible for the higher P0.1 and VE observed in Dan+ subjects during exercise.

This phenomenon can be regarded as the expression of an altered control of breathing, possibly due to chronic lung autonomic denervation and/or to increased chemosensitivity.

The presence of pulmonary sympathetic afferents has been demonstrated in dogs and monkeys (24), and the stimulation of nerves carrying pulmonary sympathetic afferents has been proven to inhibit the phrenic nerve discharge in these anesthetized animals (24). Although there are no data on the influence of these nervous pathways on the control of breathing in humans, it can be hypothesized that in Dan+ subjects a loss or reduction of sympathetic inhibition following autonomic (sympathetic) neuropathy could lead to an excessive increase in the respiratory drive and contribute to the augmentation of the ventilatory output, at least during exercise.

In this respect, five Dan+ subjects had overt signs of sympathetic dysautonomy, i.e., significant postural hypotension. Splitting the exercise response in terms of the VA/VCO2 relationship into two subsets of Dan+ subjects with and without postural hypotension, the highest VA is substantially exhibited by Dan+ subjects with postural hypotension, which supports the hypothesis that in Dan+ subjects, respiratory control is altered mainly in the presence of sympathetic damage of the autonomic nervous system (Fig. 6).


Fig. 6. Data are means ± SE. During exercise, relationship between VA and VCO2 in Dan+ was split into 2 subsets, according to absence (Dan+ PH-) or presence (Dan+ PH+) of postural hypotension. Dan+ PH+ showed steepest VA/VCO2 relationship. In Dan+ PH+, VA at corresponding VCO2 values, although not different from those in Dan+ PH-, were significantly greater than in Dan- and C (* P < 0.05).
[View Larger Version of this Image (18K GIF file)]

Alterations in central or peripheral chemosensitivity could also explain an increasing respiratory drive. We did not measure the carotid body response in our patients, but the neuromuscular and ventilatory responses to CO2 rebreathing were not different between Dan+ subjects as a group and in control subjects. Nevertheless, when the P0.1/PETCO2 and VE/PETCO2 slopes of the five Dan+ subjects with postural hypotension were computed, their values, amounting to 0.77 ± 0.05 cmH2O/Torr and 4.95 ± 1.27 l · min-1 · Torr-1, respectively, were much higher than those recorded in the five Dan+ subjects without postural hypotension and the control subjects (P < 0.01). Hence, a significant increase in central chemosensitivity can be suspected, at least in diabetic subjects with more severe autonomic neuropathy involving the sympathetic nerves.

In conclusion, our results suggest that chronic lung denervation, as occurring in severe diabetic dysautonomy, can induce alterations of the ventilatory response to exercise by influencing the breathing pattern and possibly by determining an abnormally high inspiratory drive through mechanisms still unclear, which appear to involve a damage to the sympathetic autonomic nervous system. In this context, an increased chemosensitivity may actually contribute to sustain the greater central inspiratory activity, leading to an excessively high ventilatory output during heavy exercise. It follows that pulmonary autonomic innervation seems to play a nontrivial role in modulating both the pattern and the level of stimulated ventilation in normal humans.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The technical assistance of Rita Fraboni and Gianpiero Cipiciani has been invaluable.


FOOTNOTES

   This study was supported by a grant from the Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica of Italy.

Address for reprint requests: C. Tantucci, Clinica di Semeiotica e Metodologia Medica, Ospedale Regionale Torrette, Ancona 60020, Italy.

Received 30 March 1995; accepted in final form 10 January 1996.


REFERENCES

1. Banner, N. R., R. Heaton, L. Hollingshead, A. Guz, and M. H. Yakoub. Bronchial reactivity to methacholine after combined heart-lung transplantation. Br. Heart J. 43: 955-959, 1988.
2. Banner, N. R., M. H. Lloyd, R. D. Hamilton, J. A. Innes, A. Guz, and M. H. Yacoub. Cardiopulmonary response to dynamic exercise after heart and combined heart-lung transplantation. Br. Heart J. 61: 215-223, 1989.
3. Beaver, W. L., K. Wasserman, and B. J. Wipp. Improved detection of lactate threshold during exercise using a log-log transformation. J. Appl. Physiol. 59: 1936-1940, 1985.
4. Beaver, W. L., K. Wasserman, and B. J. Wipp. A new method for detecting anaerobic threshold by gas exchange. J. Appl. Physiol. 60: 2020-2027, 1986.
5. Bellavere, F., G. Bosello, D. Fedele, C. Cardone, and M. Ferri. Diagnosis and management of diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Br. Med. J. 287: 61, 1983.
6. Bottini, P., C. Tantucci, L. Scionti, M. L. Dottorini, E. Puxeddu, G. Reboldi, G. B. Bolli, G. Casucci, F. Santeusanio, C. A. Sorbini, and P. Brunetti. Cardiovascular response to exercise in diabetic patients: influence of autonomic neuropathy of different severity. Diabetologia 38: 244-250, 1995.
7. Clifford, P. S., J. T. Litzow, J. H. vin Colditz, and R. L. Coon. Effect of chronic pulmonary denervation on ventilatory response to exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 61: 603-610, 1986.
8. Conceiçao, M. C., S. E. Fonseca, J. C. Manço, L. Gallo, Jr., A. A. Barreira, and M. C. Foss. Cholinergic bronchomotor tone and airway caliber in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Chest 101: 1038-1043, 1992.
9. Cook, C. D., J. Mead, and M. Orzalesi. Static volume-pressure characteristics of the respiratory system during maximal efforts. J. Appl. Physiol. 19: 1016-1022, 1964.
10. Douglas, N. J., I. W. Campbell, D. J. Ewing, B. F. Clarke, and D. C. Flenley. Reduced airway vagal tone in diabetic patients with autonomic neuropathy. Clin. Sci. Lond. 61: 581-584, 1981.
11. Duchen, L. W., N. A. Anjorin, P. J. Watkins, and J. D. MacKay. Pathology of autonomic neuropathy in diabetes mellitus. Ann. Intern. Med. 92: 301-303, 1980.
12. Edmunds, L. H., Jr., P. D. Graf, and J. A. Nadel. Reinnervation of the reimplanted canine lung. J. Appl. Physiol. 31: 722-727, 1971.
13. Estenne, M., G. Primo, and J. C. Yernault. Cardiorespiratory response to dynamic exercise after human heart-lung transplantation. Thorax 42: 629-630, 1987.
14. Ewing, D. J., and B. F. Clark. Diagnosis and management of diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Br. Med. J. 285: 916-918, 1982.
15. Ewing, D. J., and B. F. Clark. Diabetic autonomic neuropathy: a clinical viewpoint. In: Diabetic Neuropathy, edited by P. J. Dyck, P. K. Thomas, A. K. Asbury, A. I. Winegard, and D. Porte. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1987, p. 66-88.
16. Guz, A., M. I. M. Noble, J. H. Eisele, and D. Trenchard. Experimental results of vagal block in cardiopulmonary disease. In: Breathing: Hering-Breuer Centenary Symposium, edited by R. Porter. London: Churchill, 1970, p. 315-329.
17. Guz, A., M. I. M. Noble, D. Trenchard, H. L. Cochrane, and A. R. Makey. Studies on the vagus nerves in man: their role in respiratory and circulatory control. Clin. Sci. Lond. 27: 722-727, 1964.
18. Hansen, J. E., D. J. Sue, and K. Wasserman. Predicted values for clinical exercise testing. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 129, Suppl.: S49-S55, 1984.
19. Heaton, R. W., R. J. C. Guy, B. J. Gray, P. J. Watkins, and J. F. Costello. Diminished bronchial reactivity to cold air in diabetic patients with autonomic neuropathy. Br. Med. J. 289: 149-151, 1984.
20. Hilsted, J., H. Galbo, and N. J. Christensen. Impaired cardiovascular responses to graded exercise in diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Diabetes 28: 313-319, 1979.
21. Hingenbottam, T., M. Jackson, P. Woolman, R. Lowry, and J. Wallwork. The cough response to ultrasonically nebulized distilled water in heart-lung transplantation patients. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 140: 58-61, 1989.
22. Jones, N. L. Calculation of results. In: Clinical Exercise Testing, edited by N. L. Jones. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1988, p. 289-300.
23. Kimoff, R. J., T. H. Cheong, M. G. Cosio, A. Guerraty, and R. Levy. Pulmonary denervation in humans. Effects on dyspnea and ventilatory pattern during exercise. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 142: 1034-1040, 1990.
24. Kostreva, D. R., F. A. Hopp, E. J. Zupercu, F. O. Igler, R. L. Coon, and J. P. Kampine. Respiratory inhibition with sympathetic afferent stimulation in the canine and primate. J. Appl. Physiol. 44: 718-724, 1978.
25. Low, P. A., J. C. Walsh, C. Y. Huang, and J. G. McLeod. The sympathetic nervous system in diabetic neuropathy. Brain 98: 341-356, 1975.
26. Matilla, S., I. Matilla, B. Viljanen, and A. Viljanen. Reapparance of Hering-Breuer reflex after bilateral autotransplantation of the lungs. Scand. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 21: 15-20, 1987.
27. Phillipson, E. A., R. F. Hickey, C. R. Bainton, and J. A. Nadel. Effect of vagal blockade on regulation of breathing in conscious dogs. J. Appl. Physiol. 29: 475-479, 1970.
28. Quanjer, P. H., G. J. Tammeling, J. E. Cotes, O. F. Pedersen, R. Peslin, and J. C. Yernault. Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows: report of the Working Party "standardization of lung function tests," European Community for Coal and Steel. Eur. Respir. J. 6, Suppl. 16: 5-40, 1993.
29. Read, D. J. C. A clinical method for assessing the ventilatory response to carbon dioxide. Aust. Ann. Med. 16: 20-32, 1967.
30. Rhind, G. B., G. A. Gould, D. J. Ewing, B. F. Clarke, and N. J. Douglas. Increased bronchial reactivity to histamine in diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Clin. Sci. Lond. 73: 401-405, 1987.
31. Sanders, M. H., J. P. Costantino, G. R. Owens, F. Sciurba, R. M. Rogers, C. F. Reynolds, I. L. Paradis, B. P. Griffith, and R. L. Hardesty. Breathing during wakefulness and sleep after human heart-lung transplantation. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 140: 45-51, 1989.
32. Sandler, M. B. Is the lung a "target organ" in diabetes mellitus? Arch. Intern. Med. 150: 1385-1388, 1990.
33. Sciurba, F. C., G. R. Owens, M. H. Sanders, B. P. Griffith, R. L. Hardesty, I. L. Paradis, and J. P. Costantino. Evidence of altered pattern of breathing during exercise in recipients of heart-lung transplant. N. Engl. J. Med. 319: 1186-1192, 1988.
34. Shea, S. A., R. L. Horner, and N. R. Banner. The effect of human heart-lung transplantation upon breathing at rest and during sleep. Respir. Physiol. Lond. 72: 131-149, 1988.
35. Tantucci, C., L. Scionti, B. Bruni, M. L. Dottorini, F. Peccini, and M. Batta. Bronchial reactivity and control of breathing in diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Diabetes Nutr. Metab. 1: 315-322, 1988.
36. Van Meerhaeghe, A., and R. Sergysel. Airway anesthesia and breathing pattern during exercise in normal subjects and in patients with chronic airflow limitation. Bull. Eur. Physiopathol. Respir. 19: 54P, 1983.
37. Wassermann, K., J. E. Hensen, D. Y. Sue, and B. J. Whipp. Principles of Exercise Testing and Interpretation. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger, 1987.
38. Whitelaw, W. A., J. P. Derenne, and J. Milic-Emili. Occlusion pressure as a measure of respiratory center output in conscious man. Respir. Physiol. Lond. 23: 181-199, 1975.
39. Williams, A. J., G. A. Patterson, P. A. McClean, N. Zamel, and J. R. Maurer. Maximal exercise testing in single and double lung transplant recipients. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 145: 101-105, 1992.
40. Winning, A. J., R. D. Hamilton, S. A. Shea, C. Knott, and A. Guz. The effect of airway anaesthesia on the control of breathing and the sensation of breathlessnes in man. Clin. Sci. Lond. 68: 215-225, 1985.

0161-7567/96 $5.00 Copyright © 1996 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chronic Respiratory DiseaseHome page
A Kaparianos, E Argyropoulou, F Sampsonas, K Karkoulias, M Tsiamita, and K Spiropoulos
Pulmonary complications in diabetes mellitus
Chronic Respiratory Disease, May 1, 2008; 5(2): 101 - 108.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
M Pagkalos, N Koutlianos, E Kouidi, E Pagkalos, K Mandroukas, and A Deligiannis
Heart rate variability modifications following exercise training in type 2 diabetic patients with definite cardiac autonomic neuropathy
Br. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2008; 42(1): 47 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
S. R. Colberg, D. P. Swain, and A. I. Vinik
Use of Heart Rate Reserve and Rating of Perceived Exertion to Prescribe Exercise Intensity in Diabetic Autonomic Neuropathy
Diabetes Care, April 1, 2003; 26(4): 986 - 990.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. Mancini, M. Filippelli, G. Seghieri, I. Iandelli, F. Innocenti, R. Duranti, and G. Scano
Respiratory Muscle Function and Hypoxic Ventilatory Control in Patients With Type I Diabetes
Chest, June 1, 1999; 115(6): 1553 - 1562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tantucci, C.
Right arrow Articles by Sorbini, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tantucci, C.
Right arrow Articles by Sorbini, C. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online