|
|
||||||||
Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0623
West, John B. Prediction of barometric pressures at
high altitudes with the use of model atmospheres. J. Appl. Physiol. 81(4): 1850-1854, 1996.
It would
be valuable to have model atmospheres that allow barometric pressures
(PB) to be
predicted at high altitudes. Attempts to do this in the past using the
International Civil Aviation Organization or United States
Standard Atmosphere model have brought such models into disrepute
because the predicted pressures at high altitudes are usually much too
low. However, other model atmospheres have been developed by
geophysicists. The critical variable is the change of air temperature
with altitude, and, therefore, model atmospheres have been constructed
for different latitudes and seasons of the year. These different models
give a large range of pressures at a given altitude. For example, the maximum difference of pressure at an altitude of 9 km is from 206 to
248 Torr, i.e., ~20%. However, the mean of the model atmospheres for
latitude of 15° (in all seasons) and 30° (in the
summer) predicts PB at many
locations of interest at high altitude very well, with predictions
within 1%. The equation is PB
(Torr) = exp (6.63268
0.1112 h
0.00149 h2), where h is the altitude in
kilometers. The predictions are good because many high mountain sites
are within 30° of the equator and also many studies are made during
the summer. Other models should be used for latitudes of 45° and
above. Model atmospheres have considerable value in predicting
PB at high altitude if proper account is taken of latitude and season of the year.
Standard Atmosphere; high-altitude physiology; maximal oxygen
consumption; acclimatization; air temperature; latitude; season of the
year
THERE ARE MANY SITUATIONS in high-altitude physiology
where it would be useful to be able to predict the barometric pressure from the altitude. Examples include calculating the effect of changing
the altitude on the inspired PO2 and
the efficacy of oxygen enrichment of room air at different altitudes.
Unfortunately, in the past, attempts to predict barometric pressure
from altitude have fallen into disrepute, mainly because of the
inappropriate use of the International Civil Aviation Organization or
United States Standard Atmosphere (9, 13). Many early physiologists
determined the correct relationship between the barometric pressure and
altitudes on mountains from numerous measurements (2, 4, 5, 10, 11,
29). However, with the introduction of the Standard Atmosphere by the
aviation industry, a number of physiologists erroneously employed this
to predict barometric pressures. The most obvious errors occurred at
extreme altitudes such as the summit of Mt. Everest (6, 7, 16, 19),
where the predicted pressure was ~17 Torr lower than the true value. This difference almost certainly explains why Mt. Everest can be
climbed without supplementary oxygen (23). However, the use of the
Standard Atmosphere to predict barometric pressures also resulted in
significant errors at lower altitudes (15, 27).
Although the Standard Atmosphere is generally inapplicable in
high-altitude physiology, there are a number of other model atmospheres
that have been developed by geophysicists. These are generally unknown
in high-altitude physiology but could be valuable when used correctly.
This article discusses some model atmospheres and shows how the use of
the appropriate model for the latitude and season can give accurate
predictions for the barometric pressure-altitude relationship,
particularly at latitudes within 30° of the equator, where
many of the highest mountains are located.
The reduction in barometric pressure with increasing altitude is based
on simple physical principles. There are two basic equations. The
hydrostatic equation is
where
P is pressure,
(1)
is density, z is
height, and g is the acceleration of
gravity at height z.
The second equation is the ideal gas law in the form
|
(2) |
From these relationships, it follows that barometric pressure would decrease exponentially as altitude increased if the air temperature remained constant. However, air temperature falls with increasing altitude, and the sea level temperature and rate of fall of temperature with altitude vary according to latitude, season of the year, and atmospheric disturbances such as storms. These temperature differences are the only reasons why the pressure-altitude relationship differs between different regions of the Earth.
The Standard Atmosphere assumes a sea-level pressure of 760 Torr (1,013 mbar), sea-level temperature of 15°C, and linear decrease in temperature with altitude (lapse rate) of 6.5°C/km up to an altitude of 11 km. These conditions may never actually exist in any part of the world. However, the Standard Atmosphere was introduced as a reference atmosphere for the aviation industry, which needed some sort of average for calibrating altimeters, low-pressure chambers, and assessing the performance of aircraft under well-defined conditions. The Standard Atmosphere was never meant to be used to predict the actual barometric pressure at a particular location and was in fact developed by people who clearly recognized that there would be substantial local variations caused by latitude and seasons of the year.
Because of the dominant effect of air temperature, model atmospheres have been developed for latitudes of 15, 30, 60, and 75°N because the air temperature decreases with increasing latitude. Model atmospheres in the southern hemisphere are essentially the same if the latitude is taken into account. Because the season of the year also affects air temperature, models have been constructed for each latitude for midsummer (July in the northern hemisphere) and midwinter (January) and sometimes for other months as well. Additional model atmospheres have been developed for both unusually cold and warm conditions in the winter at the higher latitudes.
To derive a model atmosphere, air temperatures at the various altitudes
for different latitudes and seasons need to be obtained, e.g., from
radio-sonde balloons. These are released every 12 h on every day of the
year from many meteorological stations around the world. Figure
1 shows an example of a temperature profile obtained in this way.
Examples of model atmospheres. Table 1 gives the barometric pressures of a number of model atmospheres at altitudes of 0-10 km for every 15° of latitude north in midsummer (July) and midwinter (January). The original data are given in millibars (21) and have been converted to Torr by multiplying by 0.750. The values for southern latitudes are essentially the same but of course the seasons are reversed. The range of 0-10 km covers all the altitudes of interest to the high-altitude physiologist.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other model atmospheres are also available, especially for unusually warm and cold winters for 60 and 75°N latitude. However, the differences in the barometric pressures between these model atmospheres and those shown for midwinter (January) in Table 1 are very small.
The model atmospheres used by geophysicists extend up to much greater altitudes, typically 90 km (Fig. 1). This takes them into regions of the atmosphere known as the stratosphere, mesosphere, and thermosphere. However, the troposphere is the only region of importance in high-altitude physiology. The tropopause that separates the troposphere from the stratosphere has an altitude of ~9 km at the poles and 19 km at the equator and is the region of the atmosphere where the temperature falls predictably at ~6.5°C for every 1 km of ascent.
Figure 2 shows the barometric
pressure-altitude relationship for the Standard Atmosphere and for the
two extreme supplemental model atmospheres with the highest and lowest
pressures at a given altitude. The highest barometric pressures at any
altitude are near the equator, and the top line shows the means of the
models for 15°N for all seasons of the year and for the latitude of
30°N in midsummer (July). The pressures for these two models
generally agree within 1 Torr (Table 2).
Note that the pressures considerably exceed those of the Standard
Atmosphere. At an altitude of 3 km, the difference is 10 Torr, whereas
at an altitude of 9 km, the difference increases to 17 Torr. At these
very high altitudes, this is a very significant difference from a
physiological point of view; for example, the higher pressure results
in significantly higher maximal oxygen consumptions (23).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The bottom line in Fig. 2 shows the model with the lowest barometric pressures; it can be seen that the differences in pressures between the two supplemental models are enormous. At an altitude of 3 km, the difference is 31 Torr, and this increases to 42 Torr at an altitude of 9 km. These very large variations reinforce the necessity of using the correct model atmosphere to predict pressure.
Figure 2 also shows barometric pressure-altitude relationships at various sites of interest in high-altitude physiology where both the pressure and altitude are accurately known. These data are also shown in Table 3, which gives the location, latitude, month of the year or season, and source. Of course, a very large number of barometric pressures have been measured at high altitude (3), but in many instances, especially during high-altitude expeditions, the altitude is not accurately known. The measurements shown in Table 3 were selected using this criterion and were also selected to cover the large altitude range in Fig. 2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It is remarkable that most of the measurements listed in Table 3 fall close to the top line in Fig. 2. In other words, it turns out that most of the studies at high altitude give barometric pressures at the extreme top of the large range, which is predicted by model atmospheres at any given altitude. There are basically two reasons for this. One is that many of the high mountains of the world, including those with high mining sites, are within 30° latitude of the equator (26). Exceptions are the European Alps, parts of Tibet, and parts of the Colorado Rocky Mountains and Sierra Nevada in the United States. The other reason for the high pressures is that most expeditions and many scientific studies at high altitude are carried out in the summer when the pressures are highest.
Figure 3 shows the barometric
pressure-altitude relationships for the four model atmospheres of most
interest in high-altitude physiology. The uppermost line labeled 1 is
the same as the top line in Fig. 2 and is the mean for the supplemental
model at 15°N for all seasons and at 30°N in July (midsummer)
(Table 2). The line labeled 3 is for 30°N in January (midwinter),
and it can be seen that although the two lines are almost superimposed
at an altitude of 3 km, there is an appreciable difference at an altitude of 9 km, where the pressure difference is 9 Torr. This is one
reason why climbing Mt. Everest without supplementary oxygen in
midwinter is much more difficult than in midsummer, quite apart from
the lower temperatures. The resulting reduction of 9 Torr in barometric
pressure will appreciably reduce maximal oxygen consumption (23). Only
one successful summit ascent without supplementary oxygen has been made
in the winter, and this was on the first day of winter, December 22, 1987 (25).
Line 2 in Fig. 3 is for 45°N in July (midsummer). Note that the pressures are slightly higher than those for line 3, indicating that season of the year is more important than latitude over this range of latitudes. This point is emphasized even more by line 4, which is for 45°N in January (midwinter). Note the relatively large differences in barometric pressure as a result of the change from midsummer to midwinter at 45°N. At an altitude of 3 km, the pressure is 13 Torr lower, and the difference increases to 19 Torr at an altitude of 9 km.
Figure 4 shows the variation of barometric
pressure with latitude in both summer and winter according to the model
atmospheres. It can be seen that at the surface of the Earth, there is
very little variation, although there is a slight increase in
barometric pressure between latitudes of 30 and 50°N in the winter.
With increasing altitudes, the equatorial bulge of pressures becomes more prominent and is most marked at the highest altitude of 10 km.
Predicting barometric pressure pressure from a model
atmosphere. In both Figs. 2 and 3, it can be seen that
the lines are very nearly straight when the logarithm of pressure is
plotted against altitude. Actually the lines are slightly convex
upward, i.e., the slope becomes increasingly negative at high
altitudes. However, a quadratic equation using the relationship between
logarithm of pressure and altitude gives minimal errors over a large
range of altitudes, as shown in Table 2. The equation is barometric pressure = exp (6.63268
0.1112 h
0.00149 h2), where h is altitude in
kilometers and exp refers to the natural logarithm.
This equation was tested on the 14 locations listed in Table 3. The column labeled "difference" shows the amount by which the predicted pressure differs from the measured pressure. All the differences were <1%. Note that the two values in the European Alps at the highest latitude of 46°N both gave predicted pressures that were too high by 3 Torr when the mean model atmosphere for 15°N for all seasons and 30°N in July was used. However, when the correct model for 45°N in July was employed, the differences for both locations decreased to 1 Torr.
The main conclusion of this study is that the model atmospheres prepared by the geophysicists can be of considerable value in high-altitude physiology for predicting barometric pressure from altitude if they are used correctly. The key is to choose the model for the correct latitude and season. When this is done, the models have considerable predictive value as demonstrated by the results shown in Table 3 and the data points near the top line in Fig. 2.
The main reason why model atmospheres fell into disrepute was the inappropriate use the Standard Atmosphere. As pointed out earlier, the Standard Atmosphere is a compromise that does not fit any latitude or season very well and was never intended to be used to predict the barometric pressure at any particular location. However, the fact that the Standard Atmosphere has poor predictive value should not discredit other model atmospheres when they are used correctly.
As Figure 2 shows, it is remarkable that many of the barometric pressures measured at high altitude conform to one pressure-altitude relationship, making this model particularly useful. This is the mean of the models for a latitude of 15°N for all seasons and 30°N for midsummer. As Fig. 3 shows, the pressure-altitude relationship for the considerably higher latitude of 45°N is also close to the summer (line 2). The relationship for 30°N in midwinter is also close, with the pressures a little lower. When we get to midwinter at a latitude of 45°N, the barometric pressures start to deviate considerably more. However, note that up to altitudes of 5,000 m, which covers most of the commercial activities such as mines and many scientific activities such as telescope sites, the maximum difference in barometric pressure for lines 1-3 is 6 Torr. This is the maximum amount of variation of barometric pressure with season and latitude for all seasons up to a latitude of 30°N, and even up to 45°N in the summer (but not the winter).
As noted in Table 3, weather variations will cause small alterations in barometric pressure that are not accurately predictable. Even if the pressure alteration due to weather at a lower altitude is accurately known, the effect on the pressure at high altitude depends on the rate of fall of temperature in the column of air, and this is usually not available. Nevertheless, the relationships between barometric pressure and altitude presented here have considerable value in solving problems in high-altitude physiology.
This work was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant R01-HL-46910.
Address for reprint requests: J. B. West, Univ. of California, San Diego, Dept. of Medicine 0623-A, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0623.
Received 5 February 1996; accepted in final form 21 May 1996.
| 1. | Barcroft, J., C. A. Binger, A. V. Bock, J. H. Doggart, H. S. Forbes, and G. Harrop. Observations upon the effect of high altitude on the physiological processes of the human body, carried out in the Peruvian Andes, chiefly at Cerro de Pasco. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 211: 351-480, 1923. |
| 2. | Bert, P. La Pression Barométrique. Paris: Masson, 1878. Appendix I. [English translation by M. A. Hitchcock and F. A. Hitchcock. Columbus, OH: College Book, 1943.] |
| 3. | Dill, D. B., and D. S. Evans. Report barometric pressure! J. Appl. Physiol. 29: 914-916, 1970. |
| 4. | FitzGerald, M. P. The changes in the breathing and the blood of various altitudes. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 203: 351-371, 1913. |
| 5. | Haldane, J. S., and J. G. Priestley. Respiration (2nd ed.). London, UK: Oxford Univ. Press (Clarendon), 1935, p. 323. |
| 6. | Houston, C. S., and R. L. Riley. Respiratory and circulatory changes during acclimatization to high altitude. Am. J. Physiol. 149: 565-588, 1947. |
| 7. | Houston, C. S., J. R. Sutton, A. Cymerman, and J. T. Reeves. Operation Everest II: man at extreme altitude. J. Appl. Physiol. 63: 877-882, 1987. |
| 8. | Hurtado, A. Animals in high altitudes: resident man. In: Handbook of Physiology. Adaptation to the Environment. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1964. sect. 4, chapt. 54, p. 843-860. |
| 9. | International Civil Aviation Organization Manual of the ICAO Standard Atmosphere (2nd ed.). Montreal, Quebec: Int. Civil Aviation Org., 1964. |
| 10. | Jordanet, D. Influence de la Pression de l'Air Sur la Vie de l'Homme. Paris: Masson, 1875, p. 331. |
| 11. | Kellas, A. M. A consideration of the possibility of ascending the loftier Himalaya. Geogr. J. 49: 26-47, 1917. |
| 12. | Mairbaurl, H., O. Oelz, and P. Bartsch. Interactions between Hb, Mg, DPG, ATP, and Cl determine the change in Hb-O2 affinity at high altitude. J. Appl. Physiol. 74: 40-48, 1993. |
| 13. | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration US Standard Atmosphere. Washington, DC: Natl. Oceanic and Atmospheric Admin., 1976. |
| 14. | Pace, N., D. W. Kiepert, and E. M. Nissen. Climatological Data Summary for the Crooked Creek Laboratory (1949-1967) and the Barcroft Laboratory (1953-1967). Berkeley, CA: White Mountain Research Station, 1968. |
| 15. | Pugh, L. G. C. E. Resting ventilation and alveolar air on Mount Everest: with remarks on the relation of barometric pressure to altitude in mountains. J. Physiol. Lond. 135: 590-610, 1957. |
| 16. | Rahn, H., and W. O. Fenn. A Graphical Analysis of the Respiratory Gas Exchange: the O2-CO2 Diagram. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1955. |
| 17. | Reeves, J. T., R. E. McCullough, L. G. Moore, A. Cymerman, and J. V. Weil. Interactions between Hb, Mg, DPG, ATP, and Cl determine the change in Hb-O2 affinity at high altitude. J. Appl. Physiol. 75: 1117-1122, 1993. |
| 18. | Richalet, J. P., A. Hornych, C. Rathat, J. Aumont, P. Larmignat, and P. Remy. Plasma prostaglandins, leukotrienes and thromboxane in acute high altitude hypoxia. Respir. Physiol. 85: 205-215, 1991. |
| 19. | Riley, R. L., and C. S. Houston. Composition of alveolar air and volume of pulmonary ventilation during long exposure to high altitude. J. Appl. Physiol. 3: 526-534, 1951. |
| 20. | Sorenson, S. C., and J. C. Cruz. Ventilatory response to a single breath of CO2 in O2 in normal man at sea level and high altitude. J. Appl. Physiol. 27: 186-190, 1969. |
| 21. | Valley, S. L. Handbook of Geophysics and Space Environments. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965, p. 2-11. to 2-19. |
| 22. | Weiskopf, R. B., and J. W. Severinghaus. Diffusing capacity of the lung for CO in man during acute acclimation to 14,246 ft. J. Appl. Physiol. 32: 285-289, 1972. |
| 23. | West, J. B. Climbing Mt. Everest without oxygen: an analysis of maximal exercise during extreme hypoxia. Respir. Physiol. 52: 265-279, 1983. |
| 24. | West, J. B. Highest inhabitants in the world. Nature Lond. 324: 517, 1986. |
| 25. | West, J. B. Acclimatization and tolerance to extreme altitude. J. Wilderness Med. 4: 17-26, 1993. |
| 26. | West, J. B. Oxygen enrichment of room air to relieve the hypoxia of high altitude. Respir. Physiol. 99: 225-232, 1995. |
| 27. | West, J. B., S. Lahiri, K. H. Maret, R. M. Peters, Jr., and C. J. Pizzo. Barometric pressures at extreme altitudes on Mt. Everest: physiological significance. J. Appl. Physiol. 54: 1188-1194, 1983. |
| 28. | Zhuang, J., T. Droma, S. Sun, C. Janes, R. E. McCullough, A. Cymerman, S. Y. Huang, J. T. Reeves, and L. G. Moore. Hypoxic ventilatory responsiveness in Tibetan compared with Han residents of 3,658 m. J. Appl. Physiol. 74: 303-311, 1993. |
| 29. | Zuntz, N., A. Loewy, F. Muller, and W. Caspari. Atmospheric pressure at high altitudes. In: Höhenklima und Bergwanderungen in ihrer Wirkung auf den Menschen. Berlin: Bong, 1906, p. 37-39. [Translation of relevant pages in High Altitude Physiology, edited by J. B. West. Stroudsburg, PA: Hutchinson Ross, 1981.] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. C Tasker Oxygen and living at altitude Arch. Dis. Child., January 1, 2009; 94(1): 1 - 2. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. G Firth, H. Zheng, J. S Windsor, A. I Sutherland, C. H Imray, G W K Moore, J. L Semple, R. C Roach, and R. A Salisbury Mortality on Mount Everest, 1921-2006: descriptive study BMJ, December 11, 2008; 337(dec11_1): a2654 - a2654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. T. Kelly, M. P. Swanney, L. M. Seccombe, C. Frampton, M. J. Peters, and L. Beckert Air Travel Hypoxemia vs the Hypoxia Inhalation Test in Passengers With COPD Chest, April 1, 2008; 133(4): 920 - 926. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Loeppky, M. V. Icenogle, D. Maes, K. Riboni, H. Hinghofer-Szalkay, and R. C. Roach Early fluid retention and severe acute mountain sickness J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2005; 98(2): 591 - 597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Huey and X. Eguskitza Limits to human performance: elevated risks on high mountains J. Exp. Biol., March 11, 2002; 204(18): 3115 - 3119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Roach, D. Maes, D. Sandoval, R. A. Robergs, M. Icenogle, H. Hinghofer-Szalkay, D. Lium, and J. A. Loeppky Exercise exacerbates acute mountain sickness at simulated high altitude J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2000; 88(2): 581 - 585. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. BOUSSUGES, F. MOLENAT, H. BURNET, E. CAUCHY, B. GARDETTE, J.-M. SAINTY, Y. JAMMES, and J.-P. RICHALET Operation Everest III (Comex '97): Modifications of Cardiac Function Secondary to Altitude-induced Hypoxia . An Echocardiographic and Doppler Study Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 1, 2000; 161(1): 264 - 270. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. West Barometric pressures on Mt. Everest: new data and physiological significance J Appl Physiol, March 1, 1999; 86(3): 1062 - 1066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |