Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 105: 1367, 2008; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.90597.2008b
8750-7587/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content

POINT-COUNTERPOINT

Rebuttal from Van Lieshout and Secher

Neither the "neurovascular unit" (4) nor sympathetic activity to the brain vessels are recorded in humans and we have to rely on indirect evidence to evaluate the importance of sympathetic modulation of cerebral blood flow (CBF), e.g., during treatment of patients with a low blood pressure. Cerebral autoregulation describes that CBF stays relatively stable within a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of ~60–150 mmHg, while a lower pressure reduces CBF and a high MAP increases CBF (6). Thus hypotension may challenge CBF as soon as MAP decreases below the lower limit of cerebral autoregulation. As illustrated (9), the central blood volume and, therefore, cardiac output (CO) adversely influence the lower limit of cerebral autoregulation and maybe in contrast to Strandgaard and Sigurdsson (7), we consider that in situations where central blood volume is critically reduced, CBF is not being prioritized. Under those conditions cerebral perfusion declines to about one-half the normal value and cerebral oxygenation is lowered by more than 10% with development of (pre)syncopal symptoms, while a Bezold-Jarish-like reflex concurrently increases muscle blood flow and oxygenation (5, 8) as first described by Barcroft et al. (1).

Accordingly, when there is a need to pharmacologically elevate a low blood pressure, is it then sufficient to increase MAP or should CO also be elevated? As CO is, in general, not taken into account when regulation of CBF is described (6), it may be considered to be sufficient to increase MAP with the administration of an {alpha}-adrenergic agonist like phenylephrine. On the other hand, if the cerebral vessels were significantly innervated by {alpha}-adrenergic receptors, the effects of {alpha}-receptor activation restoring MAP would be considered not being limited to the peripheral vasculature but also to encompass the brain.

What we find is that administration of phenylephrine, when used to treat arterial hypotension, not only reduces CO, but also cerebral perfusion and oxygenation even when administered to a normal subject, elevating MAP to beyond what is considered the upper limit of cerebral autoregulation. Thus phenylephrine elicits cerebral vasoconstriction, illustrating a potential influence for the sympathetic nervous system in the regulation of CBF (3). Therefore phenylephrine is not the drug of choice for treatment of a hypotensive patient if the aim is to secure CBF.

Sympathetic activity to the cerebral circulation affecting CBF under certain circumstances cannot be ignored and the strategy for treatment of hypotension should include the normalization of CO in so-called individualized goal-directed volume therapy (2) to efficiently enhance CBF and cerebral oxygenation.

REFERENCES

  1. Barcroft H, Edholm OG, McMichael J, Sharpey-Schafer EP. Posthaemorrhagic fainting study by cardiac output and forearm flow. Lancet 243: 489–491, 1944.[CrossRef]
  2. Bundgaard-Nielsen M, Holte K, Secher NH, Kehlet H. Monitoring of perioperative fluid administration by individualized goal-directed therapy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 51: 331–340, 2007.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Cassaglia PA, Griffiths RI, Walker AM. Sympathetic nerve activity in the superior cervical ganglia increases in response to imposed increases in arterial pressure. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 294: R1255–R1261, 2008.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Hamel E. Perivascular nerves and the regulation of cerebrovascular tone. J Appl Physiol 100: 1059–1064, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Madsen PL, Secher NH. Near-infrared oximetry of the brain. Prog Neurobiol 58: 541–560, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Poulson OB, Strandgaard S, Edvinsson L. Cerebral autoregulation. Cerebrovasc Brain Metab Rev 2: 161–192, 1990.[Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Strandgaard S, Sigurdsson ST. Counterpoint: Sympathetic activity does not influence cerebral blood flow. J Appl Physiol; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.90597.2008a[Free Full Text]
  8. Van Lieshout JJ, Wieling W, Karemaker JM, Secher NH. Syncope, cerebral perfusion, oxygenation. J Appl Physiol 94: 833–848, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Physiological Society.