Journal of Applied Physiology Millar Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 104: 1476-1484, 2008. First published March 20, 2008; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00708.2007
8750-7587/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
104/5/1476    most recent
00708.2007v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kosek, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bamman, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kosek, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bamman, M. M.

Modulation of the dystrophin-associated protein complex in response to resistance training in young and older men

David J. Kosek and Marcas M. Bamman

Department of Physiology and Biophysics, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, and Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama

Submitted 1 July 2007 ; accepted in final form 20 March 2008


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The dystrophin-associated protein complex (DAPC) is a scaffold of proteins linking the intracellular cytoskeleton with the extracellular matrix that is integral to structural stability and integrity, signaling and mechanotransduction, and force transmission. We hypothesized that the expression of DAPC component proteins would be altered by resistance loading during progressive resistance training (PRT)-mediated myofiber hypertrophy, and we investigated whether aging influenced these changes. Seventeen young (27 yr) and 13 older (65 yr) men completed 16 wk of PRT with muscle biopsies at baseline (T1), 24 h after bout 1 (T2), and 24 h after the final bout at week 16 (T3). Myofiber hypertrophy in the young (type I 31%, P < 0.005; type II 40%, P < 0.001) far exceeded hypertrophy in the old (type II only, 19.5%, P < 0.05). PRT altered protein expression for caveolin-3 (decreased 24% by T3, P < 0.01), {alpha}1-syntrophin (increased 16% by T3, P < 0.05), {alpha}-dystrobrevin (fell 23% from T2 to T3, P < 0.01), and dystrophin [rose acutely (30% by T2, P < 0.05) and returned to baseline by T3]. The phosphorylation state of membrane neuronal nitric oxide synthase (Ser1417) decreased 70% (P < 0.005) by T3, particularly in the old (81%), whereas p38 MAPK phosphorylation increased twofold by T3 in the old (P < 0.01). We conclude that component proteins of the DAPC are modulated by PRT, which may serve to improve both structural and signaling functions during load-mediated myofiber hypertrophy. The blunted hypertrophic adaptation seen in old vs. young men may have resulted from overstress, as suggested by marked p38 MAPK activation in old men only.

muscle hypertrophy; mechanotransduction; caveolin-3; {alpha}1-syntrophin; p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase


HIGH-INTENSITY RESISTANCE exercise is a potent, noninvasive, mechanical perturbation in human muscle. The high-resistance loads demand the contracting muscle(s) to generate tremendous internal forces, particularly in limb muscles that act on class three levers, such as the knee and elbow. These extreme muscle tensions likely activate mechanotransduction processes that signal adaptations to repeated exposures during several weeks of training, such as muscle growth and structural remodeling. The muscle growth adaptation is well established. Resulting largely from accretion of myofibrillar or sarcomeric proteins, it is now generally understood that this mechanical load-mediated hypertrophy of skeletal myofibers involves upregulation of the translation initiation machinery (33) and is facilitated by satellite cell activation and myonuclear addition (28, 44). Surprisingly, the potential for remodeling of the support structures and mechanosensitive components at the myofiber membrane has received limited attention (60). Some degree of remodeling might be expected during resistance training in light of the extreme tensions generated with each bout of loading.

The dystrophin-associated protein complex (DAPC) (Fig. 1) is a mechanosensitive scaffold of proteins largely responsible for structural integrity, force transmission (2, 23), and initiating intracellular signaling processes (34), with the latter function appreciated only recently. Proteins within this complex that either are not expressed in adequate abundance, or that do not function properly, cause a weakened structural integrity of the muscle (23), membrane disruption during contraction (45), and myofiber loss. In fact, even in normal muscles, a single exposure to high-force eccentric (i.e., lengthening) contractions without prior adaptation (i.e., unaccustomed) has been shown to induce loss of DAPC components and signs of apoptosis (9, 11, 36). Conversely, muscles repeatedly subjected to mechanical overload experience growth (32), while adapting with a greater resistance to membrane wounding (20, 46). Because the DAPC plays multiple roles as a force sensor and transmitter, modulation of the DAPC in the face of increased mechanical load seems likely. By extension, changes in specific components of the DAPC may reveal key players in the load-mediated adaptive processes.


Figure 1
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Schematic representation of the dystrophin-associated protein complex highlighting the component proteins studied. nNOS, neuronal nitric oxide synthase.

 
Five such DAPC components of interest include membrane-bound neuronal nitric oxide (NO) synthase (nNOS), {alpha}1-syntrophin, caveolin-3, {alpha}-dystrobrevin, and dystrophin. For example, membrane-bound nNOS is sensitive to mechanical load induced by stretch (53), and some studies show that absence of nNOS from the muscle cell membrane (13, 14) or pharmacological blockade (3) results in dysregulation of satellite cell activation. nNOS is architecturally positioned within the DAPC (3) via {alpha}1-syntrophin linkage (14, 56), which may provide satellite cells with the necessary NO-mediated signal for activation (3, 48, 52). Caveolin-3 found within the sarcolemma is associated with the DAPC (55) and is thought to inhibit nNOS-mediated NO production (22). Dystrobrevin is a subsarcolemmal protein that has also been studied for its importance in connecting multiple other proteins for signaling and structural strength at the muscle membrane. It is a member of the dystrophin family of proteins, with the {alpha}-isoform predominating in skeletal muscle (26).

Dystrophin has been studied extensively and is known for its subsarcolemmal role in providing a linkage between cytoskeletal actin and the extracellular matrix. Binding of β-dystroglycan, dystrobrevin, and the syntrophins occurs at the COOH-terminus of dystrophin, whereas {alpha}-dystroglycan, in turn, associates with β-dystroglycan intramembranously and laminin at the extracellular matrix (2). Dystrophin knockout mice are unable to localize {alpha}1-syntrophin to the sarcolemma, resulting in a loss of nNOS from the muscle cell membrane (13, 16, 23). Dystrophin-deficient skeletal muscle is more susceptible to mechanically induced damage than normal muscle (45), a deleterious effect revealed most obviously in Duchenne's muscular dystrophy. The COOH-terminal region of dystrophin also associates with {alpha}-actinin, which may provide a signaling link between the DAPC and costameric adhesion complexes (24). MacArthur and North (37) suggest that {alpha}-actinin helps to integrate several functional pathways in skeletal muscle to maintain normal contractility, signaling, and metabolism. Two isoforms predominate in skeletal muscle, encoded by two different genes (10).

While Woolstenhulme et al. (60) assessed levels of dystrophin and the intermediate filament protein desmin, the potential for modulation of complexed sarcolemmal and subsarcolemmal DAPC component proteins has not been studied during a multiweek resistance training program in humans. The primary purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that the expression of DAPC component proteins would be altered by resistance loading during progressive resistance training (PRT)-mediated myofiber hypertrophy. In addition, because we have previously shown that the myofiber growth adaptation in young men far exceeds that in old (32), in part due to superior satellite cell recruitment (44), and others have shown that older adults are more susceptible to contraction-induced muscle damage (46), we investigated whether aging influenced load-mediated modulation of the DAPC. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2 and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) have previously been shown to associate with DAPC components and likely play important signaling roles in mechanotransduction (8, 25). We, therefore, also examined the expression and phosphorylation of ERK1/2 (primarily considered to be involved in cell division, growth, and differentiation processes) and p38 MAPK (associated with cellular stress responses) (29).


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Subjects.   Thirty men (17 young, 20–35 yr; 13 older, 60–75 yr) were recruited from the Birmingham, AL metropolitan area and were free of any musculoskeletal disorders that may have affected their ability to complete the resistance training regimen. No subjects were treated with pharmacological interventions known to influence muscle mass before or during the study. Volunteers were excluded if body mass index was not <30 kg/m2 or for any leg resistance training undertaken within 5 yr before the study. Each subject gave written, informed consent before participation, and the study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of both the University of Alabama at Birmingham and Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Subject characteristics are shown in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Subject characteristics by age group at baseline

 
PRT program.   The PRT program utilized in this study was previously described in detail (32). Briefly, subjects trained 3 days/wk for 16 wk in a program that focused on the knee and hip extensors. The regimen consisted of a warm-up on a cycle ergometer or treadmill for 5 min, followed by three resistance training exercises, including squat, leg press, and knee extension. After two familiarization sessions and practice strength tests, baseline strength was established by one repetition maximum (1 RM) testing using established procedures (6, 32). Initial training loads were set at 80% of 1 RM, and subjects progressed to three sets of each exercise during the first three sessions. The first session of three sets per movement marked the start of the 16-wk training program. Sets of 8–12 repetitions to volitional fatigue were completed for each movement, with 90-s rest periods between sets, using weight stack resistance exercise and/or plate-loaded stations (barbell squats and linear 45° leg press). Load cell and regression procedures described previously (43) were used to calculate actual resistances for comparing training and testing loads between weight stack and free weight stations. Resistance was increased when subjects completed 12 or more repetitions for at least two of the three total sets in a given exercise. This progression resulted in an average of 10–11 repetitions per set throughout the program. Subjects underwent 1 RM testing midway through training (week 8) and posttraining (week 16). We previously showed that training intensity and program adherence (~90%) were not different between age groups (32).

Muscle biopsy and tissue preparation procedures.   All muscle biopsies were performed in the Pittman General Clinical Research Center at University of Alabama at Birmingham. Muscle samples were collected from vastus lateralis muscle by percutaneous needle biopsy using a 5-mm Bergstrom biopsy needle under suction, as previously described (21). A baseline biopsy was taken from the left leg, and an acute postexercise biopsy was taken from the right leg 24 h after the first full bilateral loading bout to avoid any residual effects of the baseline biopsy. The third 16-wk posttraining biopsy was obtained 24 h after the final training session from the left leg. At the bedside, visible connective and adipose tissues were removed with the aid of a dissecting microscope. Portions of each sample (30–40 mg) to be used for RNA and protein isolation were immediately weighed and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. A separate portion for immunohistochemistry was mounted cross sectionally on cork in optimum cutting temperature mounting medium mixed with tragacanth gum and frozen in liquid nitrogen-cooled isopentane. All samples were stored at –80°C until analyses.

Myofiber cross-sectional area.   Using immunofluorescence microscopy techniques described previously (32), myofibers positive for myosin heavy chain (MHC) type I (MHC I) and negative for MHC IIa were classified as type I, fibers positive for MHC IIa and negative for MHC I were classified as type IIa, and fibers negative for both MHC I and MHC IIa were classified as type IIx. Hybrid myofibers (e.g., coexpression of I/IIa or IIa/IIx) that were revealed by both color and intensity using this technique were excluded from analyses. For cross-sectional area (CSA) measurements, each myofiber was manually traced along its laminin-stained border. Myofiber-type distribution and size were determined in blinded fashion by a single analyst, as described previously (31, 32).

Protein immunoblotting.   Immunoblotting was conducted to assess muscle cell membrane protein lysate levels of nNOS, {alpha}1-syntrophin, caveolin-3, {alpha}-dystrobrevin, dystrophin, and {alpha}-actinin. Protein lysate from the cytosolic fraction was also assessed for cytosolic nNOS content. Snap frozen muscle samples (30–40 mg) were homogenized, and supernatant assayed for total protein, as described in detail (6). Some samples taken from biopsies of subjects who entered the study in its initial stages were homogenized into whole tissue lysate, whereas samples from subjects entering the study later were divided into membrane and cytosolic fractions. Homogenization procedures were consistent within each subject across all three biopsy time points.

All samples were powdered using a liquid nitrogen-cooled mortar and pestle and homogenized in 3 µl/mg muscle of ice-cold lysis buffer specific for either whole tissue [150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris·HCl (pH 7.4), 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 1% deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 5 mM EDTA, 100 µM PMSF, 0.1 µM okadaic acid, 1 mM orthovanadate, and 0.5x protease inhibitor cocktail containing bestatin, leupeptin, and aprotinin (P2714, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO)], or cytosolic and membrane fractions [whole tissue lysis buffer plus 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 300 mM sucrose, and 1 mM magnesium chloride]. Using cytosolic/membrane fraction lysis buffer, supernatant (cytosolic fraction) was removed following centrifugation at 110,000 g at 4°C for 90 min. Resuspension buffer [50 mM sodium chloride, 0.1% SDS, 5 mM EDTA, 100 µM PMSF, 0.1 µM okadaic acid, 1 mM orthovanadate, 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 10% sucrose, and 0.5x protease inhibitor cocktail containing bestatin, leupeptin, and aprotinin (P2714, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO)] was then added at 2 µl/mg muscle to the remaining pellet, which was rehomogenized and centrifuged at 100,000 g at 4°C for 10 min to yield the membrane fraction. All muscle lysates (whole tissue, cytosolic, or membrane fraction) were assayed for total protein using the bicinchonic acid technique, with BSA as a standard.

Twenty micrograms of total protein diluted in Laemmli buffer were separated by SDS-PAGE (120-V constant) in 4–15% Tris·HCl mini-gels (Bio-Rad MP3, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) for all proteins of molecular mass <120 kDa. Those proteins of molecular mass over 120 kDa (nNOS and dystrophin) were separated by SDS-PAGE (120-V constant) in 5% Tris·HCl mini-gels (Bio-Rad MP3, Bio-Rad Laboratories). Transfer from 4–15% gels was conducted at constant current (1 mA/cm2 x 30 min) to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes using a semidry transfer cell (Trans-Blot SD, Bio-Rad Laboratories). Five percent gels were transferred to PVDF membranes using a wet transfer cell, 14 h 20 min at 10-V constant current in a 4°C cold room, followed by 1 h at 100 V in an ice-cold circulating water bath. Within subjects, baseline, acute postexercise, and 16-wk posttraining samples were loaded in adjacent lanes. To control for age bias, each 12-lane gel contained samples for at least one subject from each age group, with subject groups loaded in alternating fashion on each gel. Equal loading across lanes and equal transfer were verified by staining all gels (after transfer) with Coomassie blue, staining randomly selected membranes with Ponceau S, and immunoblotting for β-actin.

Primary antibody specificities, optimal blocking conditions, and target antigen migration patterns (i.e., molecular masses) were confirmed in control experiments. Immunoblotting was carried out using rabbit polyclonal antibodies against {alpha}1-syntrophin (1:1,000, Sigma, S4688), caveolin-3 (1:1,000, Abcam, ab2912), {alpha}-actinin (1:2,000, Sigma, A2543), p38 MAPK (1:1,000, Cell Signaling Technology), ERK1/2 (1:1,000, Cell Signaling Technology), and phosphorylated Ser1417 nNOS (1 µg/ml, Upstate Signaling Solutions, 07-544); a goat polyclonal antibody against {alpha}-dystrobrevin (1:500, Santa Cruz, sc-13812); and mouse monoclonal antibodies against dystrophin (1:250, Vector, VP-D508), nNOS (1:1,000, BD Bioscience, 610308), phosphorylated Thr180/Tyr182 p38 (1:2,000, Cell Signaling Technology), and phosphorylated Thr202/Tyr204 ERK2 (p44) (1:2,000, Cell Signaling Technology). Membranes were blocked simultaneously with primary antibody incubation, and blocking solution varied, depending on the primary antibody. Membranes treated with polyclonal primary antibodies were blocked with 2% BSA, 2% milk in PBST (1 x PBS with 0.1% Tween 20), while horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (1:50,000) or donkey anti-goat (1:50,000) secondary antibodies were diluted in 0.5% BSA and 0.5% milk in PBST. Membranes treated with monoclonal primary antibodies were blocked with 5% goat serum in PBST, whereas horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse (1:50,000) secondary antibody was diluted in 1% goat serum in PBST. The combined blocking solution/primary antibody incubation was performed overnight at 4°C under gentle agitation followed by incubation in secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature, with a PBST rinse protocol between treatments (one quick rinse, 1 x 10 min, 2 x 5 min).

All bands were visualized by chemiluminescence (Super West Dura kit, Pierce Biotechnologies, Rockford, IL) in a BioRad ChemiDoc imaging system, and band densitometry was performed using BioRad Quantity One software, as our laboratory previously described in detail (6). For each imaging session, serial imaging ceased at the first point of saturation on the developing image. This standardization, combined with equal and random distribution of the two age groups across the gels (PVDF membranes), enabled us to accurately test for age and resistance training effects.

Statistical analysis.   Data are reported as means ± SE. Between-groups differences in preexercise descriptive variables were tested using independent t-tests. All variables measured across 16 wk of training were analyzed using age x time repeated-measures ANOVA. Lysate levels of specific proteins were assessed across all three biopsy time points and were thus analyzed via 2 (age group) x 3 (time point) repeated-measures ANOVA. For each ANOVA model with a significant main or interaction effect, Tukey honestly significant difference tests were performed post hoc to localize the effect(s). Statistical significance was accepted at P < 0.05 for all tests. Muscle tissue lysate was fractionated into membrane and cytosolic fractions for 17 of the 30 subjects. The nNOS analysis was limited to these 17 subjects (11 young, 6 old), since nNOS is located in both compartments, making the whole tissue lysate nNOS data impossible to interpret. This restriction enabled us to test differential changes in cytosolic and membrane-bound nNOS across training. Protein levels of caveolin-3, {alpha}-dystrobrevin, {alpha}-actinin, and phosphorylated and total p38 MAPK were determined on all 30 subjects (17 young, 13 old). Technical problems resulted in fewer subjects for {alpha}1-syntrophin (13 young, 10 old), dystrophin (14 young, 10 old), and phosphorylated and total ERK1/2 (17 young, 12 old).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Myofiber CSA.   Figure 2 illustrates the results that 16 wk of PRT had on myofiber growth in young and older men. Data are displayed as magnitudes of myofiber growth (measured in µm2) for type I and type II myofibers in young and older men. Due to the well-known shift of MHC IIx to MHC IIa expression induced by resistance training, an insufficient number of IIx myofibers for CSA assessment were found at the 16-wk time point. Training-induced changes in myofiber size were, therefore, restricted to type I and type II myofibers, with type II CSA being a weighted average based on the relative distributions of IIa and IIx myofibers, as we have described (32).


Figure 2
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Magnitude change of myofiber size as measured by cross-sectional area (CSA) of type I and type II myofibers in young (solid bars) and older (open bars) men. Values are means ± SE in µm2 change. *Different from baseline within group, P < 0.05. Young men produced significant growth of both type I (1,300 µm2 or 31%, P < 0.0005) and type II (1,992 µm2 or 40%, P < 0.001) myofibers, whereas older men achieved significant hypertrophy of type II myofibers only (888 µm2 or 19.5%, P < 0.05).

 
A main time effect (P < 0.001) and age group x time interaction (P < 0.005) were found for type I myofiber size. No pretraining differences were noted between young and older men. However, PRT resulted in an overall 17% increase (P < 0.0005) in CSA that was driven by young men, who gained over 1,300 µm2 in type I myofiber area (31% increase, P < 0.0005). Older men showed no significant training-induced type I myofiber growth.

PRT elicited significant growth of type II myofibers. A main age effect was observed (P < 0.05), as young men possessed 19% larger type II fibers overall compared with their older counterparts. A main time effect (P < 0.0001) revealed a 32% increase in type II CSA. Post hoc analysis showed that young men enhanced CSA of type II myofibers by 1,992 µm2 (over 40%, P < 0.001), more than twice the type II hypertrophy seen in old men (888 µm2 or 19.5%, P < 0.05). The age difference in hypertrophy response was revealed by an age group x time interaction (P < 0.05), despite the significant type II myofiber growth found in each age group.

Components of the DAPC.   A schematic of the DAPC in Fig. 1 shows the associations among DAPC proteins bound to one another, the contractile apparatus, and other costameric proteins. DAPC protein results are presented in Figs. 3 and 4. Levels of the transmembrane protein, caveolin-3, are shown in Fig. 3A. A main time effect was found, as caveolin-3 levels dropped by week 16 (P < 0.005). Post hoc Tukey analysis revealed a 20% decline from 0 to 16 wk (P < 0.05) and a 24% reduction from the acute time point to week 16 (P < 0.01). Because caveolin-3 inhibits nNOS (22, 55), we also analyzed the ratio of caveolin-3 to membrane nNOS; however, no significant changes across time were noted for either age group (data not shown). Older men tended to express 34% more caveolin-3 (P = 0.051) than their young counterparts before training.


Figure 3
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Immunoblot results for caveolin-3 (A), {alpha}1-syntrophin (B), membrane nNOS (C), and ratio of phosphorylated Ser1417 to total membrane nNOS (D). Values are means ± SE for all subjects. Closed and open circles indicate mean values for young and older men, respectively. AU, arbitrary units. E: representative immunoblots of each protein from each age group across the 3 time points: baseline (1), bout 1 (2), and week 16 (3). MEM, membrane. {dagger}Main time effect, P < 0.05. Post hoc results on main time effects are shown on bars: *different from baseline, P < 0.05; #different from bout 1, P < 0.05.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Immunoblot results for {alpha}-dystrobrevin (A), dystrophin (B), and {alpha}-actinin (C). Values are means ± SE for all subjects. Closed and open circles indicate mean values for young and older men, respectively. D: representative immunoblots of each protein from each age group across the 3 time points. {dagger}Main time effect, P < 0.05. Post hoc results on main time effects are shown on bars: *different from baseline, P < 0.05; #different from bout 1, P < 0.05.

 
{alpha}1-Syntrophin protein levels are shown in Fig. 3B. No significant difference in expression existed between young and older men, but a main time effect (P < 0.05) was found, as {alpha}1-syntrophin expression increased 16% from baseline to week 16. Because caveolin-3 has been shown to inhibit nNOS function, while {alpha}1-syntrophin is necessary for localizing this enzyme to the sarcolemma, we analyzed the ratio of caveolin-3 to {alpha}1-syntrophin as a method for indirectly determining any modulation of the DAPC that would contribute to nNOS inhibition or potential enhancement as a result of training. Results illustrated a main time effect (P < 0.001), whereby subjects decreased the ratio of caveolin-3 to {alpha}1-syntrophin by 39% by week 16. The effect was driven primarily by older men, who decreased this ratio 48% (P < 0.05).

Protein levels of nNOS were determined in cytosolic and membrane-bound fractions separately. Membrane fraction nNOS protein levels are shown in Fig. 3C. There was a strong trend toward an age x time interaction (P = 0.054), as membrane nNOS tended to increase by week 16 among older men, while remaining relatively stable in the young. Cytosolic nNOS expression did not differ by age group and was unaltered by resistance training (data not shown). We also examined the phosphorylation state of an activating phosphorylation site on nNOS. Phosphorylation of nNOS at Ser1417 upregulates NO synthesis in the kidney (42); thus we examined this activation site in skeletal muscle (Fig. 3D). We found a striking main time effect (P < 0.005), as nNOS Ser1417 phosphorylation was 70% lower at week 16 compared with baseline. Among older men, Ser1417 phosphorylation dropped 81% by week 16 (P < 0.05), while young men showed no significant changes.

{alpha}-Dystrobrevin protein data are shown in Fig. 4A. A main time effect (P < 0.05) was found, as expression tended to rise acutely (not significant), followed by a significant 23% decline by week 16 (P < 0.01). Post hoc analysis revealed that a significant 28% decrease from the acute time point to 16 wk in young men (P < 0.05) drove the main effect. Young men tended to express more {alpha}-dystrobrevin before training (37%, P = 0.088). Dystrophin results are presented in Fig. 4B. Immunoblotting using an antibody specific for the rod domain of dystrophin detected two bands that may result from the presence of two dystrophin isoforms, but this was not confirmed. The densitometry results presented in Fig. 4B represent both bands combined (analyses of each band individually yielded the same statistical results as when the bands were combined). A main time effect (P < 0.01) was brought on by a 30% acute increase (P < 0.05) followed by a significant decrease back to near baseline levels by 16 wk (–20%, P < 0.05). A trend toward an age group x time interaction (P = 0.07) was noted, as only young men significantly decreased dystrophin levels from the acute time point to week 16 (–32%, P < 0.05). Figure 4C illustrates the stability of {alpha}-actinin in response to 16 wk of resistance training, as well as the similarity in expression between age groups. No significant changes were found for {alpha}-actinin in either age group across the training regimen.

Intracellular MAPK signaling.   Total and phosphorylated levels of ERK1/2 (p42/44) and p38 MAPK were assessed, since these kinases have shown activation in response to mechanical stretch (41) and exercise (1) and associate with DAPC components (8, 25). Figure 5, A and B, displays the ratios of phosphorylated to total ERK and p38 MAPK, respectively. Representative Western blots are shown in Fig. 5C for each age group across the three time points. β-Actin served as a loading control. β-Actin levels were quite stable, as no age differences or time effects were found. ERK1/2 results revealed no significant age differences or time effects in phosphorylated or total protein levels. However, results for p38 MAPK illustrated a main time effect for total protein (P < 0.05), as p38 MAPK expression fell roughly 22% from the acute time point through week 16 (P < 0.05). A main time (P < 0.01) effect and age group x time interaction (P < 0.05) were found for the phosphorylation state of p38 MAPK. Post hoc analysis revealed an overall 65% increase in the phosphorylation state from the acute time point through week 16 (P < 0.01). The interaction was caused by a marked increase among older men, who doubled the relative amount of phosphorylated p38 MAPK by week 16 compared with both the baseline (P < 0.01) and acute response (P < 0.05) time points.


Figure 5
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Immunoblot results for ratios of phosphorylated to total ERK1/2 (A) and p38 MAPK (B). Values are means ± SE for all subjects. Closed and open circles indicate mean values for young and older men, respectively; statistical results shown are for all subjects. C: representative immunoblots of each protein from each age group across the 3 time points. {dagger}Main time effect, P < 0.05. {ddagger}Age group x time interaction, P < 0.05. Post hoc results on main time effects are shown on bars: #different from bout 1, P < 0.05.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Overall, these findings generally support the hypothesis that resistance training alters the skeletal muscle protein content of specific DAPC components. Aging had limited influence over DAPC modulation, but markedly affected stress-response signaling (p38 MAPK phosphorylation), which may have impaired the myofiber hypertrophy adaptation in old men. Young men were capable of inducing two times the growth of their older counterparts in type II myofibers, and only young men experienced type I myofiber growth. Several components of the DAPC were altered in response to a single exercise bout and/or after 16 wk of resistance training (caveolin-3, {alpha}1-syntrophin, {alpha}-dytrobrevin, and dystrophin).

Resistance training consists of repeated bouts of high-intensity contractions separated by lengthy rest periods. As is the case with any exercise treatment, the long-term "training" adaptations can be viewed as the cumulative result of acute responses to each loading bout. Acute resistance loading stimulates muscle transcript (30, 31, 47) and protein (59) expression and transient activation of intracellular protein kinase cascades (e.g., ERK, MAPK) (58). However, the acute responses to a single bout of resistance loading can differ markedly in trained vs. untrained muscle (7, 27, 32). It is generally understood that mechanical load-mediated hypertrophy of skeletal myofibers requires upregulation of the protein synthesis machinery (57, 61) and is facilitated by myonuclear addition (28, 44), yet the mechanotransduction events sparking these processes are unclear. The DAPC is a mechanosensitive structure that may, in fact, be responsible for providing the spark, but it has received little attention in resistance training studies. Although the myotendinous junction, neuromuscular junction, DAPC, and other costameric proteins probably all play important roles in mechanotransduction (23, 54), the DAPC was examined due to the suggested necessity of nNOS for stretch-mediated satellite cell activation (4, 5) and the importance of other DAPC components for structural stability, force transmission, and additional intracellular processes. Reductions in caveolin-3 promote nNOS enzyme activity (22, 55), as caveolin-3 expression disrupts NO synthesis (22) without affecting nNOS expression (50). It is attractive to speculate that the decrease in caveolin-3 expression reported here may have enhanced nNOS function, which appears to play a key role in satellite cell activation (3, 52). Initially, we predicted {alpha}1-syntrophin expression levels would increase in response to training, enhancing signaling via direct syntrophin phosphorylation (25, 38), offering more structural stability to growing myofibers, and providing increased linkage for nNOS at the sarcolemma. Although subtle, levels of {alpha}1-syntrophin did increase in response to resistance training, which may have enhanced both structural strength and signaling capacity of the DAPC. On the other hand, the rise may have been in response to membrane overstress and heightened p38 activity, as p38-{gamma} binds the PDZ domain of {alpha}1-syntrophin, resulting in phosphorylation (25).

Dystrophin levels increased acutely after the initial resistance loading bout. In stark contrast, a single exposure to damage-inducing, high-force (9), or extremely high-velocity (36) eccentric (i.e., lengthening) contractions without prior adaptation (i.e., unaccustomed) has been shown to reduce dystrophin levels in injured myofibers. The discrepancy may be explained by marked differences in the contraction paradigms used. Our conventional resistance exercise paradigm involved concentric-eccentric actions with identical external resistances; thus only submaximal eccentric forces were generated as limited by concentric strength. The severity of membrane wounding was, therefore, likely much lower in our model. Regardless, the initial elevation in dystrophin may have been an overcompensation, as lack of a similar response at week 16 suggests acclimation to the repetitive stimulus and indicates additional dystrophin is not necessary during training-mediated myofiber hypertrophy.

It is apparent that absence of nNOS from the sarcolemma (13) and pharmacological inhibition of NO (3) result in dysregulation of satellite cell activation. Anderson and colleagues (4, 5) proposed that the primary source of NO for such a task is membrane-bound nNOS, due to its proximity with satellite cells, as well as for the possibility of NO production in response to stretch on the sarcolemma during contraction. NO has been shown to enhance hepatocyte growth factor-mediated satellite cell activation (51, 52). We predicted that membrane-bound nNOS expression would increase in young men in response to training, based on the idea that this would provide enhanced NO production for the purposes of activating satellite cells (51, 52) and contributing to other processes. We also expected this effect to be less robust in older men, affording some explanation for their reduced ability to activate these quiescent stem cells. Contrary to our hypothesis, membrane-bound nNOS protein content did not change. To test whether nNOS function may have been altered, we assessed the phosphorylation state of Ser1417. Phosphorylation of this residue has been shown to induce NO production in the kidney (42), and Chen et al. (17) assessed this phosphorylation site in human muscle homogenates following a bout of high-intensity cycling. We found no change in nNOS phosphorylation following the initial resistance loading bout, and, in fact, a substantial reduction was noted in response to resistance exercise after week 16 of training. This finding was unexpected, but the functional importance of nNOS phosphorylation at this and alternative sites, at least in skeletal muscle, is not fully understood.

{alpha}-Actinin levels remained unchanged. {alpha}-Actinin binds the COOH terminus of dystrophin, providing a linkage that associates the DAPC with the actin cytoskeleton and other costameric adhesion complex proteins, such as vinculin, talin, and β1-integrin (24). Not only does this provide structural support to myofibers but also it allows for signaling between two complexes thought to be important in mechanotransduction from the contractile machinery outwardly to the cell membrane [DAPC and {alpha}71-integrin complex (15)]. Our findings suggest adequate levels of {alpha}-actinin exist; however, we did not differentiate {alpha}-actinin isoforms.

Intracellular signaling events, such as protein kinase cascades, may "prime" the myofiber's transcriptional and translational machinery, and there is evidence that MAPK signaling is upregulated in response to exercise in skeletal (1, 62) and cardiac (27) muscle and in response to skeletal muscle stretch (41). Such signaling provides the muscle with a contraction-mediated method for regulating a host of intracellular processes, including transcription of muscle-specific genes, the initiation of growth processes, as well as the activation of protein degradation. ERK-MAPK signaling responses are largely rapid and short lived following mechanical load (58). Based on the transient nature of the normal signaling time course, a prolonged or delayed MAPK activation (i.e., detected 24 h after mechanical load) suggests an abnormal response that may be indicative of a failing compensatory effort. This might be expected in the old, as older animals clearly demonstrate an impaired and prolonged regeneration and/or recovery time course following muscle injury (19, 39, 40). We found a twofold elevation in the phosphorylation state of p38 MAPK only among the old, 24 h after resistance exercise at the conclusion of the 16-wk training program. Phosphorylation of p38 MAPK in skeletal muscle is induced by mechanical stress and damage (8, 12) and is associated with muscle atrophy (18). In fact, p38 phosphorylation has been shown to be required for cytokine-mediated expression of the muscle-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase muscle atrophy F-box/atrogin-1 (35), which is associated with increased proteasome activity. We have previously reported robust increases in protein abundance of the myogenic transcription factor, myf-6, during resistance training in both young (64%) and older (93%) adults, even though myofiber hypertrophy was blunted in the old (32). Heightened activation of p38 MAPK has been shown to suppress myogenesis via phosphorylation (inhibition) of myf-6 (49). These data combined suggest the impaired rate of hypertrophy among older men may have been at least partially mediated by the deleterious effects of overstress.

Conclusions.

Overall, we report that acute resistance loading and/or long-term resistance training modulates the levels of some component proteins comprising the mechanosensitive DAPC, with limited age differences in DAPC responsiveness. Additionally, the marked 24-h postexercise elevation in p38 MAPK phosphorylation among the old after 16 wk of 3 day/wk high-intensity resistance training points to the possibility that the muscles of older men experienced an overstress throughout training and hence an impaired growth rate. Identifying the specific signaling process(es) that drives myofiber growth in the young, and slows the rate of hypertrophy among older adults, will be an important step toward designing the most efficacious, age-specific resistance training prescriptions.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Funding for this work was provided by National Institute on Aging Grant R01 AG017896 (M. M. Bamman), Veterans Affairs Merit Grant (M. M. Bamman), and General Clinical Research Center Grant M01 RR 00032.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
We are indebted to the research subjects for invaluable contributions to this work. We thank S. C. Tuggle for administering the resistance training program.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. M. Bamman, UAB Dept. of Physiology and Biophysics, Core Muscle Research Laboratory, 966 McCallum Bldg., 1530 3rd Ave. South, Birmingham, AL 35294-0005 (e-mail: mbamman{at}uab.edu)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Akimoto T, Pohnert SC, Li P, Zhang M, Gumbs C, Rosenberg PB, Williams RS, Yan Z. Exercise stimulates PGC-1alpha transcription in skeletal muscle through activation of the p38 MAPK pathway. J Biol Chem 280: 19587–19593, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Albrecht DE, Froehner SC. Syntrophins and dystrobrevins: defining the dystrophin scaffold at synapses. Neurosignals 11: 123–129, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Anderson JE. A role for nitric oxide in muscle repair: nitric oxide-mediated activation of muscle satellite cells. Mol Biol Cell 11: 1859–1874, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Anderson JE, Vargas C. Correlated NOS-IMU and Myf5 expression by satellite cells in mdx mouse muscle regeneration during NOS manipulation and deflazacort treatment. Neuromuscul Disord 13: 388–396, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Anderson JE, Wozniak AC. Satellite cell activation on fibers: modeling events in vivo–an invited review. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 82: 300–310, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Bamman MM, Ragan RC, Kim JS, Cross JM, Hill VJ, Tuggle SC, Allman RM. Myogenic protein expression before and after resistance loading in 26- and 64-yr-old men and women. J Appl Physiol 97: 1329–1337, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Bamman MM, Petrella JK, Kim JS, Mayhew DL, Cross JM. Cluster analysis tests the importance of myogenic gene expression during myofiber hypertrophy in humans. J Appl Physiol 102: 2232–2239, 2007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Batchelor CL, Winder SJ. Sparks, signals and shock absorbers: how dystrophin loss causes muscular dystrophy. Trends Cell Biol 16: 198–205, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  9. Beaton LJ, Tarnopolsky MA, Phillips SM. Contraction-induced muscle damage in humans following calcium channel blocker administration. J Physiol 544: 849–859, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Beggs AH, Byers TJ, Knoll JH, Boyce FM, Bruns GA, Kunkel LM. Cloning and characterization of two human skeletal muscle alpha-actinin genes located on chromosomes 1 and 11. J Biol Chem 267: 9281–9288, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Biral D, Jakubiec-Puka A, Ciechomska I, Sandri M, Rossini K, Carraro U, Betto R. Loss of dystrophin and some dystrophin-associated proteins with concomitant signs of apoptosis in rat leg muscle overworked in extension. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 100: 618–626, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Boppart MD, Burkin DJ, Kaufman SJ. {alpha}7β1-Integrin regulates mechanotransduction and prevents skeletal muscle injury. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 290: C1660–C1665, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Brenman JE, Chao DS, Xia H, Aldape K, Bredt DS. Nitric oxide synthase complexed with dystrophin and absent from skeletal muscle sarcolemma in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Cell 82: 743–752, 1995.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  14. Brenman JE, Chao DS, Gee SH, McGee AW, Craven SE, Santillano DR, Wu Z, Huang F, Xia H, Peters MF, Froehner SC, Bredt DS. Interaction of nitric oxide synthase with the postsynaptic density protein psd-95 and alpha1-syntrophin mediated by pdz domains. Cell 84: 757–767, 1996.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  15. Burkin DJ, Wallace GQ, Milner DJ, Chaney EJ, Mulligan JA, Kaufman SJ. Transgenic expression of {alpha}7β1 integrin maintains muscle integrity, increases regenerative capacity, promotes hypertrophy, and reduces cardiomyopathy in dystrophic mice. Am J Pathol 166: 253–263, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Chao DS, Gorospe JR, Brenman JE, Rafael JA, Peters MF, Froehner SC, Hoffman EP, Chamberlain JS, Bredt DS. Selective loss of sarcolemmal nitric oxide synthase in Becker muscular dystrophy. J Exp Med 184: 609–618, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Chen ZP, McConell GK, Michell BJ, Snow RJ, Canny BJ, Kemp BE. AMPK signaling in contracting human skeletal muscle: acetyl-coa carboxylase and no synthase phosphorylation. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 279: E1202–E1206, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Childs TE, Spangenburg EE, Vyas DR, Booth FW. Temporal alterations in protein signaling cascades during recovery from muscle atrophy. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 285: C391–C398, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Conboy IM, Conboy MJ, Smythe GM, Rando TA. Notch-mediated restoration of regenerative potential to aged muscle. Science 302: 1575–1577, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Croisier JL, Camus G, Venneman I, Deby-Dupont G, Juchmes-Ferir A, Lamy M, Crielaard JM, Deby C, Duchateau J. Effects of training on exercise-induced muscle damage and interleukin 6 production. Muscle Nerve 22: 208–212, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  21. Evans W, Phinney S, Young V. Suction applied to a muscle biopsy maximizes sample size. Med Sci Sports Exerc 14: 101–102, 1982.[Web of Science][Medline]
  22. Garcia-Cardena G, Martasek P, Masters BS, Skidd PM, Couet J, Li S, Lisanti MP, Sessa WC. Dissecting the interaction between nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and caveolin. Functional significance of the NOS caveolin binding domain in vivo. J Biol Chem 272: 25437–25440, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Grounds MD, Sorokin L, White J. Strength at the extracellular matrix-muscle interface. Scand J Med Sci Sports 15: 381–391, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  24. Hance JE, Fu SY, Watkins SC, Beggs AH, Michalak M. Alpha-actinin-2 is a new component of the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex. Arch Biochem Biophys 365: 216–222, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  25. Hasegawa M, Cuenda A, Spillantini MG, Thomas GM, Buee-Scherrer V, Cohen P, Goedert M. Stress-activated protein kinase-3 interacts with the pdz domain of alpha1-syntrophin. A mechanism for specific substrate recognition. J Biol Chem 274: 12626–12631, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Hornberger TA, Esser KA. Mechanotransduction and the regulation of protein synthesis in skeletal muscle. Proc Nutr Soc 63: 331–335, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  27. Iemitsu M, Maeda S, Jesmin S, Otsuki T, Kasuya Y, Miyauchi T. Activation pattern of MAPK signaling in the hearts of trained and untrained rats following a single bout of exercise. J Appl Physiol 101: 151–163, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Kadi F, Charifi N, Denis C, Lexell J, Andersen JL, Schjerling P, Olsen S, Kjaer M. The behaviour of satellite cells in response to exercise: what have we learned from human studies? Pflügers Arch 451: 319–327, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  29. Kefaloyianni E, Gaitanaki C, Beis I. ERK1/2 and p38-MAPK signalling pathways, through MSK1, are involved in NF-kappaB transactivation during oxidative stress in skeletal myoblasts. Cell Signal 18: 2238–2251, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  30. Kim JS, Cross JM, Bamman MM. Impact of resistance loading on myostatin expression and cell cycle regulation in young and older men and women. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 288: E1110–E1119, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Kim JS, Kosek DJ, Petrella JK, Cross JM, Bamman MM. Resting and load-induced levels of myogenic gene transcripts differ between older adults with demonstrable sarcopenia and young men and women. J Appl Physiol 99: 2149–2158, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Kosek DJ, Kim JS, Petrella JK, Cross JM, Bamman MM. Efficacy of 3 days/wk resistance training on myofiber hypertrophy and myogenic mechanisms in young vs. older adults. J Appl Physiol 101: 531–544, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Kubica N, Bolster DR, Farrell PA, Kimball SR, Jefferson LS. Resistance exercise increases muscle protein synthesis and translation of eukaryotic initiation factor 2b epsilon mRNA in a mammalian target of rapamycin-dependent manner. J Biol Chem 280: 7570–7580, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Kumar A, Khandelwal N, Malya R, Reid MB, Boriek AM. Loss of dystrophin causes aberrant mechanotransduction in skeletal muscle fibers. FASEB J 18: 102–113, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Li YP, Chen Y, John J, Moylan J, Jin B, Mann DL, Reid MB. TNF-alpha acts via p38 MAPK to stimulate expression of the ubiquitin ligase atrogin 1/MAFbx in skeletal muscle. FASEB J 19: 362–370, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Lovering RM, De Deyne PG. Contractile function, sarcolemma integrity, and the loss of dystrophin after skeletal muscle eccentric contraction-induced injury. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 286: C230–C238, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. MacArthur DG, North KN. A gene for speed? The evolution and function of alpha-actinin-3. Bioessays 26: 786–795, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  38. Madhavan R, Jarrett HW. Phosphorylation of dystrophin and alpha-syntrophin by Ca(2+)-calmodulin dependent protein kinase II. Biochim Biophys Acta 1434: 260–274, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Marsh DR, Criswell DS, Carson JA, Booth FW. Myogenic regulatory factors during regeneration of skeletal muscle in young, adult, and old rats. J Appl Physiol 83: 1270–1275, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Marsh DR, Criswell DS, Hamilton MT, Booth FW. Association of insulin-like growth factor mRNA expressions with muscle regeneration in young, adult, and old rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 273: R353–R358, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Martineau LC, Gardiner PF. Insight into skeletal muscle mechanotransduction: MAPK activation is quantitatively related to tension. J Appl Physiol 91: 693–702, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Mount PF, Fraser SA, Watanabe Y, Lane N, Katsis F, Chen ZP, Kemp BE, Power DA. Phosphorylation of neuronal and endothelial nitric oxide synthase in the kidney with high and low salt diets. Nephron Physiol 102: p36–p50, 2005.[CrossRef]
  43. Petrella JK, Kim JS, Tuggle SC, Hall SR, Bamman MM. Age differences in knee extension power, contractile velocity, and fatigability. J Appl Physiol 98: 211–220, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Petrella JK, Kim JS, Cross JM, Kosek DJ, Bamman MM. Efficacy of myonuclear addition may explain differential myofiber growth among resistance-trained young and older men and women. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 291: E937–E946, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Petrof BJ, Shrager JB, Stedman HH, Kelly AM, Sweeney HL. Dystrophin protects the sarcolemma from stresses developed during muscle contraction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 3710–3714, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Ploutz-Snyder LL, Giamis EL, Formikell M, Rosenbaum AE. Resistance training reduces susceptibility to eccentric exercise-induced muscle dysfunction in older women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56: B384–B390, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Psilander N, Damsgaard R, Pilegaard H. Resistance exercise alters MRF and IGF-I mRNA content in human skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 95: 1038–1044, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Smith LW, Smith JD, Criswell DS. Involvement of nitric oxide synthase in skeletal muscle adaptation to chronic overload. J Appl Physiol 92: 2005–2011, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Suelves M, Lluis F, Ruiz V, Nebreda AR, Munoz-Canoves P. Phosphorylation of MRF4 transactivation domain by p38 mediates repression of specific myogenic genes. EMBO J 23: 365–375, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  50. Sunada Y, Ohi H, Hase A, Hosono T, Arata S, Higuchi S, Matsumura K, Shimizu T. Transgenic mice expressing mutant caveolin-3 show severe myopathy associated with increased nNOS activity. Hum Mol Genet 10: 173–178, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Tatsumi R, Hattori A, Ikeuchi Y, Anderson JE, Allen RE. Release of hepatocyte growth factor from mechanically stretched skeletal muscle satellite cells and role of ph and nitric oxide. Mol Biol Cell 13: 2909–2918, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Tatsumi R, Liu X, Pulido A, Morales M, Sakata T, Dial S, Hattori A, Ikeuchi Y, Allen RE. Satellite cell activation in stretched skeletal muscle and the role of nitric oxide and hepatocyte growth factor. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 290: C1487–C1494, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Tidball JG, Lavergne E, Lau KS, Spencer MJ, Stull JT, Wehling M. Mechanical loading regulates NOS expression and activity in developing and adult skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 275: C260–C266, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Towler MC, Kaufman SJ, Brodsky FM. Membrane traffic in skeletal muscle. Traffic 5: 129–139, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  55. Venema VJ, Ju H, Zou R, Venema RC. Interaction of neuronal nitric-oxide synthase with caveolin-3 in skeletal muscle. Identification of a novel caveolin scaffolding/inhibitory domain. J Biol Chem 272: 28187–28190, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Wakayama Y, Inoue M, Murahashi M, Shibuya S, Jimi T, Kojima H, Oniki H. Ultrastructural localization of alpha 1-syntrophin and neuronal nitric oxide synthase in normal skeletal myofiber, and their relation to each other and to dystrophin. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 94: 455–464, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
  57. Welle S, Thornton C, Statt M. Myofibrillar protein synthesis in young and old human subjects after three months of resistance training. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 268: E422–E427, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Williamson D, Gallagher P, Harber M, Hollon C, Trappe S. Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway activation: effects of age and acute exercise on human skeletal muscle. J Physiol 547: 977–987, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Willoughby DS, Nelson MJ. Myosin heavy-chain mRNA expression after a single session of heavy-resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34: 1262–1269, 2002.[Web of Science][Medline]
  60. Woolstenhulme MT, Conlee RK, Drummond MJ, Stites AW, Parcell AC. Temporal response of desmin and dystrophin proteins to progressive resistance exercise in human skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 100: 1876–1882, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Yarasheski KE, Pak-Loduca J, Hasten DL, Obert KA, Brown MB, Sinacore DR. Resistance exercise training increases mixed muscle protein synthesis rate in frail women and men ≥76 yr old. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 277: E118–E125, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Yu M, Blomstrand E, Chibalin AV, Krook A, Zierath JR. Marathon running increases ERK1/2 and p38 MAP kinase signalling to downstream targets in human skeletal muscle. J Physiol 536: 273–282, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
D. L. Mayhew, J.-s. Kim, J. M. Cross, A. A. Ferrando, and M. M. Bamman
Translational signaling responses preceding resistance training-mediated myofiber hypertrophy in young and old humans
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2009; 107(5): 1655 - 1662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
104/5/1476    most recent
00708.2007v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kosek, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bamman, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kosek, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bamman, M. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Physiological Society.