Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Appl Physiol 103: 1166-1171, 2007. First published July 12, 2007; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01176.2006
8750-7587/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
103/4/1166    most recent
01176.2006v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vinagre, C. G. C.
Right arrow Articles by Maranhão, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vinagre, C. G. C.
Right arrow Articles by Maranhão, R. C.

Enhanced removal from the plasma of LDL-like nanoemulsion cholesteryl ester in trained men compared with sedentary healthy men

Carmen G. C. Vinagre,1 Elisabeth S. Ficker,1 Claudia Finazzo,1 Maria J. N. Alves,1 Katia de Angelis,1 Maria Claudia Irigoyen,1 Carlos E. Negrão,1 and Raul C. Maranhão1,2

1Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo Medical School, and 2Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Submitted 18 October 2006 ; accepted in final form 10 July 2007


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of exercise training on plasma removal of a cholesterol-rich nanoemulsion (LDE) that mimics low-density lipoprotein (LDL) lipid structure and binds to LDL receptors. LDE-derived cholesteryl ester plasma kinetics was studied in 24 exercise-trained and 20 sedentary male subjects. LDE labeled with [14C]cholesteryl ester was injected intravenously, and plasma samples were collected over a 24-h period to determine radioisotope decay curves. LDL cholesterol concentration was similar in both groups. Fractional clearance rate (FCR) of the nanoemulsion label was greater in the exercise-trained group compared with the sedentary group (0.138 ± 0.152 and 0.0261 ± 0.023 h–1, respectively). A positive correlation was found (r = 0.60, P < 0.01) between FCR and peak O2 consumption in trained subjects. Circulating oxidized LDL levels were lower in trained subjects compared with the sedentary group (9.0 ± 2.0 and 16.0 ± 3.0 mU/l). LDE was also injected into control and LDL receptor gene knockout mice submitted and not submitted to training. Muscle LDE uptake percentage was increased in the trained mice compared with the untrained mice (1.1 ± 0.8 and 0.2 ± 0.1, respectively, P < 0.0001) in the control group but not in the knockout animals, indicating that the LDL receptor is involved in the increased uptake elicited by exercise. These results show that exercise training increases LDE plasma removal, which in turn suggests that it also increases LDL receptors or LDL receptor activity.

cholesterol; lipoproteins; nanoemulsions; exercise training

THE EFFECTS OF EXERCISE TRAINING on plasma lipoprotein profile have been well investigated. Exercise training usually tends to minimally decrease the concentration of fasting plasma triacylglycerols that mostly reflect the status of very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and tends to increase the antiatherogenic high-density lipoprotein (HDL) fraction (17–20, 33).

With regard to low-density lipoprotein (LDL), one of the most important lipid risk factors for atherogenesis, exercise training does not substantially change the lipoprotein concentration. It may, however, qualitatively change the lipoprotein particles. Exercise training decreases the small, dense LDL subfraction (40), as well as the susceptibility to oxidation (7, 36) and oxidized LDL concentration (7, 40). These effects are recognized as consistently antiatherogenic. The determination of the kinetics of LDL removal from the plasma is crucial in understanding the metabolic events and the quantitative and qualitative changes the lipoprotein undergoes while in the circulation. LDL plasma concentration is determined by the balance between the lipoprotein production rate and the lipoprotein removal rate from the plasma. LDL production comprises the hepatic synthesis of VLDL, LDL precursor lipoprotein, and VLDL catabolism by lipoprotein lipase action, with the generation of LDL. LDL uptake by body tissues is mediated through cell membrane receptors that recognize apolipoprotein (apo) B-100, the vast majority of protein in LDL (5).

In previous studies, we showed that artificially made nanoparticles that resemble the LDL lipidic structure and were termed LDE may be used to explore the LDL intravascular metabolism. LDE lacks protein, but when it is injected into the bloodstream, it acquires several small-molecular-weight apolipoproteins, including apo E (22). Apo E allows LDE particles to bind to the LDL receptors, since those receptors recognize not only the apo B present in LDL but also apo E that is not found in the LDL fraction (42). This approach was validated in animal and human studies and has been shown useful to disclose alterations of LDL metabolism in several clinical conditions (14, 22, 24–26, 32, 37). Conceivably, and differently from the metabolism of native LDL, genetic defects in the apo B structure affecting LDL binding to the receptors do not affect the removal from the plasma of LDE (11).

In this study, to determine whether exercise training alters the LDL intravascular metabolism, we determined the kinetics of LDE labeled with cholesteryl ester in a group of exercise-trained and in sedentary subjects. Also sought were relationships between lipoprotein kinetics and changes in the LDL status by simultaneously measuring the concentration of oxidized LDL in the plasma. The possibility that trained muscle can take up more LDE-cholesteryl ester than the untrained muscle was examined in control and LDL receptor knockout mice submitted or not submitted to exercise.


   METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Study Population

Study subjects were healthy male volunteers aged ≤50 yr. All were nonobese, were nonsmokers, did not have alcoholism, were nondiabetic, were under no treatment with lipid-lowering drugs, and had no arterial hypertension. All were submitted to a clinical and cardiopulmonary exercise evaluation before beginning the study. The two study groups were as follows.

Exercise-trained group.   The exercise-trained group comprised 24 amateur cyclists (mean age 31 ± 7 yr; minimum 18 yr, maximum 49 yr), with an average training load of ~2-h sessions, three to four times per week. All trained individuals were oriented to abstain from any exercise training or other physical activities for at least 2 days before testing as exercise can acutely alter the plasma volume (39). Only subjects that practiced one sport modality were included in this group because of the well-known sport modality-dependent peak O2 consumption (VO2 peak) variability (34).

Untrained group.   The untrained group comprised 20 healthy sedentary men (mean age 38 ± 6 yr; minimum 19 yr, maximum 50 yr). Their jobs and dietary habits did not substantially differ from those of the exercise-trained group. They were also oriented to abstain from any sort of physical activity that would alter their usual sedentary routine for at least 2 days before testing.

Table 1 shows that age and body mass index were similar for the two groups. The experimental protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of the University of São Paulo Medical School Hospital. An informed written consent was obtained from each participant.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1. Physical characteristics, plasma lipids, oxidized LDL, and fractional clearance rate of the nanoemulsion 14C-labeled cholesteryl ester in exercise-trained and sedentary subjects

 
VO2 peak

Maximal exercise capacity was determined by means of a maximal progressive exercise test on an electromagnetically braked cycle ergometer (SensorMedics, Ergometrics 800, SensorMedics, Yorba Linda, CA), with work rate increments of 20 and 40 W every minute at 60 rpm until exhaustion for exercise-trained individuals and sedentary normal controls, respectively. Oxygen uptake (VO2) was determined by means of gas exchange on a breath-by-breath basis in a computerized system (VMAX, SensorMedics). The cycle ergometer was calibrated every 3–4 mo. VO2 peak was defined as the maximum attained VO2 at the end of the exercise period, which was determined by the moment in which the subject could no longer maintain the cycle ergometer velocity at 60 rpm and achieved two of the following criteria: 1) a plateau or leveling-off in the oxygen uptake with increase of oxygen uptake of less than 1.5 ml·kg–1·min–1 or successive values within 5% of each other (30) despite progressive increases in exercise intensity every 60 s, 2) respiratory exchange rate of 1.1 or above (15), and 3) heart rate above 95% of the age-related maximum (27).

LDE Preparation

LDE was prepared from a lipid mixture composed of 40.0 mg cholesteryl oleate, 20.0 mg egg phosphaditylcholine, 1.0 mg triolein, and 0.5 mg cholesterol. For the plasma kinetic studies in subjects, 14C-labeled cholesteryl ester (cholesteryl [14C]oleate) (70 kBq) was added to the mixture. For the animal experiments, the lipid mixture was labeled with [3H]cholesteryl ether. The lipidic mixture was then submitted to an ultrasonic irradiation in aqueous media, dried through nitrogen flux, and purified by a procedure of two-step ultracentrifugation, according to Ginsburg et al. (10) modified by Maranhão et al. (22). The final lipid composition of LDE was 64% phospholipids, 33% cholesteryl oleate, 2% triacylglycerols, and 1% cholesterol. LDE was dialyzed against a saline solution and sterilized by passage through 0.22-µm filter. The entire nanoemulsion preparation procedure was performed in a laminar flux. All glassware used in this study was made pyrogen free by exposure to dried steam at 180°C for 2 h and sterilized by wet steam at 120°C for 30 min. All plastic materials were sterilized by ultraviolet light exposition. The risk due to the nanoemulsion injection is considered minimal and related to the consequences inherent to venous puncture. The risk of infection is minimum as well, since preparations were tested for sterility and absence of pyrogen. Furthermore, the injected nanoemulsion volume was extremely small, which reduces the chance of pyrogenic reactions.

Radiological Protection

The radioactive dose used in the intravenously injected labeled lipid experiments with the patients was in strict accordance with the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) (38), as described in our previous study (23). The equivalent dose induced by the injected radioactivity dose was 0.03 mSv, well below the permitted 50.0 mSv maximum dose.

Kinetic Studies

The test began at approximately 9 AM with all participants fasting for a 12-h period. One hundred microliters of LDE containing 37 kBq 14C-labeled cholesteryl ester and a total of 1 mg cholesteryl ester was intravenously injected in a bolus. Plasma samples were collected during 24 h, in intervals of 5 min and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h after injection.

The subjects were allowed to eat low-fat meals, which included grilled chicken and fish, vegetables, fruits, and fruit juices on the evening before the test day and after the first blood collection and at about 1:00 PM, since it has been demonstrated that low-fat meals do not interfere with plasma removal of the LDE nanoemulsion (22). During the first 8 h of the sample collection, all the participants were resting in the laboratory test room and remained seated. They were then allowed to return home and come back to the laboratory the next day to collect the last (24 h) blood sample. They were oriented to rest at home.

Radioactivity in aliquots of 1.0 ml of plasma was quantified in a scintillation solution (PPO:dimethyl POPOP:Triton X-100:toluene, 5 g:0.5 g:333 ml:667 ml) using a liquid scintillation analyzer (Packard beta spectrometer, model 1600 TR).

The FCR of the LDE 14C-labeled cholesteryl ester was calculated by compartmental analysis, using a computational program (28) (Fig. 1) .


Figure 1
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 1. Compartmental model used to analyze the kinetics of cholesterol-rich nanoemulsion (LDE) cholesteryl ester (CE). The model consists of two discrete compartments for [14C]CE label. All compartments are in the intravascular space (1CE and 2CE). LDE [14C]CE was injected intravenously in a bolus (arrow with asterisk) into compartment 1CE. A fraction k1,0CE of the labeled lipid is removed to the extravascular space. Competitively, fraction k1,2CE of the injected lipid is converted into compartment 2CE due to the incorporation of apolipoproteins available in the plasma. Subsequently, the materials of this compartment is transferred to the extravascular space following the k2,0CE route. The sampling, represented by triangle, corresponds to the indiscriminate combination of compartments 1CE and 2CE.

 
FCR Estimation of the Radioisotope

For each patient the kinetic activity-time curve was fitted to the mathematical model (19) defined by the sum of two exponential functions, i.e., y = A1eFormula + A2eFormula. The model consists of two discrete pools, one intravascular pool in dynamic equilibrium with an extravascular pool. This model assumes that all input or exit of the radiolabeled lipid occurs from the intravascular pool. The fractional clearance rate of the radiolabeled lipid was estimated as

Formula
which is essentially the inverse of the area under the activity-time curve. The compartment model used is illustrated in Fig. 1.

Plasma Lipid Measurements

Starting at approximately 9 AM, venous blood samples were collected of the participants after 12-h fast to determine plasma lipid levels.

Total cholesterol (Boehringer-Mannheim, Penzberg, Germany) and triacylglycerols (Abbott Laboratories) were determined by commercial enzymatic methods, using an automatic instrument (Cobas Mira Plus, Roche, Basel, Switzerland). HDL cholesterol was determined by the same method used for total cholesterol after lipoprotein chemical precipitation. VLDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were calculated by the Friedewald formula (9).

Oxidized LDL Plasma Concentration

An EDTA-blood sample was collected to measure circulating levels of plasma oxidized LDL by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit, using monoclonal antibody 4E6 (12) (Mercodia AB, Uppsala, Sweden).

Tissue LDE Uptake in Control and LDL Knockout Mice

Twenty-four male C57/6J and 11 LDL knockout mice (25–30 g) were obtained from the breeding facility of the Heart Institute. The mice received standard laboratory feed and tap water ad libitum and were housed in temperature-controlled rooms (22°C) under a 12:12-h dark-light cycle. Control and LDL knockout mice were randomly assigned to nontrained and trained groups.

Exercise training was performed on a motor treadmill at low-moderate intensity (~50–70% maximal running speed) for 1 h each day, 5 days/wk for 4 wk, with gradual increase in speed from 0.3 to 1.2 km/h. All animals were adapted to the procedure (10 min/day; 0.3 km/h) for 1 wk before the beginning of the exercise training period. After the adaptation, the animals assigned to the untrained group were placed on the stationary treadmill three times per week to provide a similar environment to that of the trained animals.

Untrained and trained mice were submitted to a maximal treadmill test as described in detail in a previous study (6). The tests were made at the beginning and at the end of the training protocol. The purpose was to determine in both mice groups aerobic capacity and exercise training intensity.

After the training session, LDE labeled with [3H]cholesteryl ether was injected into the jugular vein through a polyethylene-tipped Tygon cannula. Twenty four hours following the injection of radioactive emulsion, the animals were killed. Fragments of the biceps femoris and the liver were removed, washed in an ice-cold saline solution, dried in filter paper, and weighed. Lipids of 1 g of tissue were extracted with chloroform-methanol (2:1 vol/vol) (8) and separated by thin-layer chromatography (TLC). Radioactivity in the TLC bands corresponding to cholesteryl ether was measured using a liquid scintillation analyzer (Packard beta spectrometer, model 1600 TR).

This protocol was approved by the Experimental Animal Use Committee of the University of São Paulo.

Statistical Analysis

The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was applied to verify the data distribution. The Student t-test was used for normally distributed data, and the Mann-Whitney test for those with non-Gaussian distribution.

The Student t-test was used to evaluate the differences in plasma concentrations of total, LDL, VLDL, and HDL cholesterol, triacylglycerols, and in decay curves of nanoemulsion cholesteryl ester between trained and sedentary subjects, as well as the differences in the percentage of hepatic and skeletal muscle LDE uptake per gram of tissue between trained and untrained mice. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the FCR of the emulsion label. Statistical significance was set at the P < 0.05 level, and values were expressed as means ± SD.

The plasma decay curves of nanoemulsion cholesterol ester of athletes and sedentaries were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with repeated measures. When significance was found, post hoc Scheffé's comparison was used to test the differences between conditions.

Spearman correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the correlation between the cholesterol [14C]oleate-FCR and total and LDL cholesterol.

For all comparisons, probability values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
High VO2 peak values displayed in Table 1 confirm better physical capacity of the trained individuals. Table 1 shows that the concentration of total and LDL cholesterol and plasma triacylglycerol concentrations did not differ between exercise-trained individuals and sedentary individuals. On the other hand, HDL cholesterol was higher in the trained individuals. In Table 1, plasma concentration of oxidized LDL values are also shown. There was roughly two times more oxidized LDL in the plasma of the sedentary group than the trained group.

Figure 2 shows the decay curves of the nanoemulsion cholesteryl ester for both groups. The two-way ANOVA with repeated-measure test followed by Scheffé's post hoc comparisons showed that there was a significant difference between the curves of both groups. The nanoemulsion cholesteryl ester plasma decay was faster in athletes compared with sedentaries (P = 0.0038). Table 1 shows the FCR values of the LDE label obtained from the curves. Indeed, LDE cholesteryl ester FCR is pronouncedly greater in trained individuals than in sedentary individuals. No correlation was found between the FCR of the cholesteryl ester of LDE and plasma concentration of total and LDL cholesterol.


Figure 2
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 2. Plasma emulsion [14C]cholesteryl ester decay curves of the exercise training ({blacksquare}) and the sedentary ({square}) groups. Points represent means, and bars represent SE. *Significant difference between groups, P = 0.0038.

 
Tables 2 and Table 3, show the uptake of LDE cholesteryl both by the muscle and the liver of control and of LDL receptor knockout mice submitted to and not submitted to exercise training. Exercise training in control mice increased the muscle uptake of LDE. This training effect was nullified in LDL receptor knockout mice: in those animals, there is no difference in tissue uptakes between the trained and the untrained group. Whereas the LDE liver uptake was decreased by training in the controls, in the LDL receptor knockout mice, training did not change the hepatic uptake.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 2. Uptake of LDE cholesteryl ether by the skeletal muscle and liver of control mice submitted or not submitted to exercise training

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 3. Uptake of LDE cholesteryl ether by the skeletal muscle and liver of LDL receptor knockout mice submitted or not submitted to exercise training

 

   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
In this study, the removal from the plasma of LDE was markedly accelerated in the exercise-trained group compared with the sedentary group. Since LDE is removed mostly by the LDL receptors (26), the mechanism underlying this effect is presumably through the induction by exercise of increased activity of LDL receptors. As long as we injected a standard preparation into the subjects, the effects on LDE FCR can only be ascribed to the mechanisms of LDL removal from the plasma and not to eventual differences in LDL composition that could affect the removal of the native lipoprotein (42). We have shown that the radioactively labeled cholesteryl ester moiety of LDE behaves very similar to the labeled apo B of native LDL, although it is removed faster from the plasma than apo B (14, 28, 42).

It is worthwhile to point out that the removal of LDE from the plasma was greater in the exercise-trained subjects despite their LDL cholesterol values being similar to those of the sedentary group. This suggests that the increased removal of LDE and for extension of LDL could be compensated by an increased input of the lipoprotein into the plasma compartment. Therefore, exercise training can elicit increased LDL turnover, i.e., the LDL plasma pool is renewed more rapidly.

Jacobs et al. (16) and Altena et al. (1) examined the effects of exercise training on LDL cholesterol before and after a 9-wk and a 4-wk endurance training applied to sedentary subjects, respectively. In the first study (16), LDL cholesterol decreased by only 7%, whereas in the second study training had no effect whatsoever (1). It is worthwhile to point out that the plasma volume may be expanded in trained subjects (39), which could also tend to diminish the LDL-cholesterol concentration.

The oxidation of LDL is involved in coronary artery disease (CAD) (12, 13). Although scavenger receptors are the main mechanism for oxidized LDL uptake, depending on the degree of oxidation, oxidized LDL may still be recognized by the LDL receptors (4). This study showed that the oxidized LDL levels in the exercise-trained were two times smaller than in the sedentary subjects. Regarding this issue, Sanchez-Quesada et al. (35) found that aerobic exercise increased the LDL susceptibility to oxidation, while Bergholm et al. (3) reported that the susceptibility was unchanged. However, subsequent studies showed that either susceptibility to oxidation (7, 36) or oxidized LDL concentration (7, 40) are decreased in exercise-trained subjects, as did the present study. These findings do not appear to be directly mediated by increased antioxidant status (40) or by the ability of HDL to inhibit LDL oxidation (2). Thus, in view of our results, the hypothesis can be raised that the smaller concentration of oxidized LDL can be due, at least in part, to the increased removal from the plasma and the increased turnover of the lipoprotein in the plasma compartment of exercise-trained subjects, as assessed by the LDE approach. It is conceptually valid to assume that in subjects with accelerated removal and increased turnover of LDL, the lipoprotein would be less prone to undergo deleterious changes such as increased plasma lipid oxidizability and peroxidation.

Our results suggest that the greater LDL exposure to oxidation by the increased generation of reactive oxygen species during an exercise session (21) would largely be compensated by the increased renewal of the plasma pool of the lipoprotein. The overall result would be a net reduction of oxidized LDL in exercise-trained subjects.

The presumable increase in LDL receptor expression in exercise-trained subjects could be taking place either in the liver, which is the main uptake tissue for both the native lipoprotein and for LDE (24), or in peripheral tissues, such as muscle, that is directly affected either mechanically or metabolically by exercise training.

The current experiments show that the increase in LDE uptake by the skeletal muscle in trained control mice no longer persists in LDL receptor-knockout trained mice. It follows that this effect on the LDE uptake can be reasonably ascribed to an increase in LDL receptor activity due to exercise. This assumption is confirmed by the finding of decreased hepatic uptake of LDE in trained controls, whereas in the LDL receptor knockout mice the hepatic uptake was unaffected by training. This is an additional indication that in controls, LDE is deviated to the muscle because of the increase in LDL receptor activity by training. The results from our animal experiments strongly suggest that the positive effect of the exercise training on the LDE plasma clearance observed in our study subjects is due to increased uptake of the nanoparticles by the muscle.

It has been well established that a sedentary lifestyle is an important independent risk factor for CAD (31). Furthermore, it has been suggested that exercise training is related to an attenuated progression of atherosclerotic lesions (29). LDL receptor function has been considered a major antiatherogenic factor. Therefore, our results offer a new mechanism to explain the role of exercise training in the prevention of cardiac disease. By increasing the LDL removal from the plasma, exercise training may promote the removal of the lipoprotein by the physiological LDL receptor endocytic pathway, avoiding the scavenger receptor-mediated macrophage uptake.

In conclusion, this study shows that sedentary subjects have greater difficulty in removing a nanoemulsion that binds to LDL receptors than do exercise-trained subjects, although the LDL concentration in the plasma shows no difference. The compared results of control and LDE-receptor knockout mice suggest that the exercise-induced increase in LDE clearance observed in the cyclists was mediated by the LDL receptors. Consequently, it is possible that the LDL turnover in sedentary subjects is diminished in the absence of exercise training, thus exposing the lipoprotein to greater oxidative transformation. These observations may furnish an additional mechanism whereby a sedentary lifestyle is an independent risk factor for CAD and exercise training a protection against the development of the disease.


   GRANTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
This study was supported by Fundação do Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), São Paulo, Brazil (Grant 99/01229-2). R. C. Maranhão has a Research Grant from the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Brasilia, Brazil.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REFERENCES
 
We are grateful to William A. Presada for revising the text and to Dr. Carlos H. Mesquita for guidance in the kinetic study data analysis.

Use of LDE for drug-targeting purposes is protected as in U.S. Patent 5,578,583.


   FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. C. Maranhão, Instituto do Coração (INCOR) do HC-FMUSP, Laboratório de Metabolismo de Lípides, Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar 44, CEP 05423-000 São Paulo, SP, Brazil (e-mail: ramarans{at}usp.br)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Altena TS, Michaelson JL, Ball SD, Guilford BL, Thomas TR. Lipoprotein subfraction changes after continuous or intermittent exercise training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 38: 367–372, 2006.
  2. Benitez S, Sanchez-Quesada JL, Lucero L, Arcelus R, Ribas V, Jorba O, Castellvi A, Alonso E, Blanco-Vaca F, Ordonez-Llanos J. Changes in low-density lipoprotein electronegativity and oxidizability after aerobic exercise are related to the increase in associated non-esterified fatty acids. Atherosclerosis 160: 223–232, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Bergholm R, Makimattila S, Valkonen M, Liu ML, Lahdenpera S, Taskinen MR, Sovijarvi A, Malmberg P, Yki-Jarvinen H. Intense physical training decreases circulating antioxidants and endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in vivo. Atherosclerosis 145: 341–349, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Berliner JA, Territo MC, Sevanian A, Ramin S, Kim JA, Bamshad B, Esterson M, Fogelman AM. Minimally modified low density lipoprotein stimulates monocyte endothelial interactions. J Clin Invest 85: 1260–1266, 1990.[Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Brown MS, Goldstein JL. A receptor-mediated pathway for cholesterol homeostasis. Science 232: 34–47, 1986.[Free Full Text]
  6. Desai KH, Sato R, Schauble E, Barsh GS, Kobilka BK, Bernstein D. Cardiovascular indexes in the mouse at rest and with exercise: new tools to study models of cardiac disease. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 272: H1053–H1061, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Elosua R, Molina L, Fito M, Arquer A, Sanchez-Quesada JL, Covas MI, Ordonez-Llanos J, Marrugat J. Response of oxidative stress biomarkers to a 16-week aerobic physical activity program, and to acute physical activity, in healthy young men and women. Atherosclerosis 167: 327–334, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Folch J, Lees M, Sloane-Stanley GM. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J Biol Chem 226: 497–509, 1957.[Free Full Text]
  9. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DD. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 18: 499–502, 1972.[Abstract]
  10. Ginsburg GS, Small DM, Atkinson D. Microemulsion of phospholipids and cholesterol esters. Protein-free models of low density lipoprotein. J Biol Chem 257: 8216–8227, 1982.[Free Full Text]
  11. Hirata RDC, Hirata MH, Mesquita CH, Cesar TB, Maranhão RC. Effects of apolipoprotein B-100 on the metabolism of a lipid microemulsion model in rats. Biochim Biophys Acta 1437: 53–62, 1999.[Medline]
  12. Holvoet P, Vanhaecke J, Janssens S, Van de Werf F, Collen D. Oxidized LDL and malondialdehyde-modified LDL in patients with acute coronary syndromes and stable coronary artery disease. Circulation 98: 1487–1494, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Hulthe J, Fagerberg B. Circulating oxidized LDL is associated with subclinical atherosclerosis development and inflammatory cytokines (AIR Study). Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 22: 1162–1167, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Hungria VT, Latrilha MC, Rodrigues DG, Bydlowski SP, Chiattone CS, Maranhao RC. Metabolism of a cholesterol-rich microemulsion (LDE) in patients with multiple myeloma and a preliminary clinical study of LDE as a drug vehicle for the treatment of the disease. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 53: 51–60, 2004.[Web of Science][Medline]
  15. Issekutz B, Birkhead NC, Rodahl K. Use of respiratory quotients in assessment of aerobic work capacity. J Appl Physiol 17: 47–50, 1962.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Jacobs KA, Krauss RM, Fattor JA, Horning MA, Friedlander AL, Bauer TA, Hagobian TA, Wolfel EE, Brooks GA. Endurance training has little effect on active muscle free fatty acid, lipoprotein cholesterol, or triglyceride net balances. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 291: E656–E665, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Kraus WE, Houmard JA, Duscha BD, Knetzger KJ, Wharton MB, McCartney JS, Bales CW, Henes S, Samsa GP, Otvos JD, Kulkarni KR, Slentz CA. Effects of the amount and intensity of exercise on plasma lipoproteins. N Engl J Med 347:1483–1492, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. LeMura LM, Von Duvillard SP, Andreacci J, Klebez JM, Chelland SA, Russo J. Lipid and lipoprotein profiles, cardiovascular fitness, body composition, and diet during and after resistance, aerobic and combination training in young women. Eur J Appl Physiol 82:451–458, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  19. Lewis GF, Lamarche B, Uffelman KD, Heatherington AC, Honig MA, Szeto LW, Barrett PH. Clearance of postprandial and lipolytically modified human HDL in rabbits and rats. J Lipid Res 38: 1771–1778, 1997.[Abstract]
  20. Lippi G, Schena F, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Ballestrieri F, Guidi GC. Comparison of the lipid profile and lipoprotein(a) between sedentary and highly trained subjects. Clin Chem Lab Med 44: 322–326, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  21. Liu ML, Bergholm R, Makimattila S, Lahdenpera S, Valkonen M, Hilden H, Yki-Jarvinen H, Taskinen MR. A marathon run increases the susceptibility of LDL to oxidation in vitro and modifies plasma antioxidants. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 276: E1083–E1091, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Maranhão RC, Cesar TB, Pedroso-Mariane SR, Hirata MH, Mesquita CH. Metabolic behavior in rats of a nonprotein microemulsion resembling low-density lipoprotein. Lipids 28: 691–696, 1993.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  23. Maranhão RC, Feres MC, Martins MT, Mesquita CH, Toffoletto O, Vinagre CG, Gianinni SD, Pileggi F. Plasma kinetics of a chylomicron-like emulsion in patients with coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis 126: 15–25, 1996.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  24. Maranhão RC, Garicochea B, Silva EL, Dorlhiac-Llacer P, Cadena SM, Coelho IJ, Meneghetti JC, Pileggi FJ, Chamone DA. Plasma kinetics and biodistribution of a lipid emulsion resembling low-density lipoprotein in patients with acute leukemia. Cancer Res 54: 4660–4666, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Maranhão RC, Graziani SR, Yamaguchi N, Melo RF, Latrilha MC, Rodrigues DG, Couto RD, Schreier S, Buzaid AC. Association of carmustine with a lipid emulsion: in vitro, in vivo and preliminary studies in cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 49: 487–498, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  26. Maranhão RC, Roland IA, Toffoletto O, Ramires JA, Goncalves RP, Mesquita CH, Pileggi F. Plasma kinetic behavior in hyperlipidemic subjects of a lipidic microemulsion that binds to LDL receptors. Lipids 32: 627–633, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  27. Maritz JS, Morrison JF, Peter J, Strydom NB, Wyndham CH. A practical method of estimating and individual's maximal oxygen uptake. Ergonomics 4: 97–122, 1961.
  28. Mesquita CH. Cinética do quilomícron marcado com 3H-TG e 14C-CE. Análise Compartimental Auxiliar. São Paulo: Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares (IPEN), 1994 [Publicações IPEN].
  29. Niebauer J, Hambrecht R, Velich T, Hauer K, Marburger C, Kalberer B, Weiss C, Von Hodenberg E, Schlierf G, Schuler G, Zimmermann R, Kubler W. Attenuated progression of coronary artery disease after 6 years of multifactorial risk intervention-role of physical exercise. Circulation 96: 2534–2541, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Niemelã K, Palatsi I, Takkunen J. The oxygen uptake-work-output relationship of runners during graded cycling exercise: sprinters vs. endurance runners. Br J Sports Med 14: 204–209, 1980.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Paffenbarger RS Jr, Hyde RT, Jung DL, Wing AL. Epidemiology of exercise and coronary heart disease. Clin Sports Med 3: 297–318, 1984.[Web of Science][Medline]
  32. Pinto LB, Wajngarten M, Silva EL, Vinagre CG, Maranhão RC. Plasma kinetics of a cholesterol-rich emulsion in young, middle-aged, and elderly subjects. Lipids 36: 1307–1313, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  33. Ring-Dimitriou S, von Duvillard SP, Paulweber B, Stadlmann M, Lemura LM, Peak K, Mueller E. Nine months aerobic fitness induced changes on blood lipids and lipoproteins in untrained subjects versus controls. Eur J Appl Physiol 99: 291–299, 2007.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  34. Roveda F, Middlekauff HR, Rondon MU, Reis SF, Souza M, Nastari L, Barretto AC, Krieger EM, Negrão CE. The effects of exercise training on sympathetic neural activation in advanced heart failure: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 42: 854–860, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Sanchez-Quesada JL, Homs-Serradesanferm R, Serrat-Serrat J, Serra-Grima JR, Gonzalez-Sastre F, Ordonez-Llanos J. Increase of LDL susceptibility to oxidation occurring after intense, long duration aerobic exercise. Atherosclerosis 118: 297–305, 1995.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  36. Sanchez-Quesada JL, Ortega H, Payes-Romero A, Serrat-Serrat J, Gonzalez-Sastre F, Lasuncion MA, Ordonez-Llanos J. LDL from aerobically-trained subjects shows higher resistance to oxidative modification than LDL from sedentary subjects. Atherosclerosis 132: 207–213, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  37. Santos RD, Hueb W, Oliveira AA, Ramires JAF, Maranhão RC. Plasma kinetics of a cholesterol-rich emulsion in subjects with or without coronary disease. J Lipid Res 44: 464–469, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Sowby FS. Limits for intakes of radionuclides by workers. In: Radiation Protection,edited by Sowby FS.Oxford, UK: Pergamon, 1984, part I (Publication 30 ICRP).
  39. Thompson PD, Cullinane EM, Eshleman R, Sady SP, Herbert PN. The effects of caloric restriction or exercise cessation on the serum lipid and lipoprotein concentrations of endurance athletes. Metabolism 33: 943–950, 1984.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  40. Vasankari T, Lehtonen-Veromaa M, Mottonen T, Ahotupa M, Irjala K, Heinonen O, Leino A, Viikari J. Reduced mildly oxidized LDL in young female athletes. Atherosclerosis 151: 399–405, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  41. Vega GL, Grundy SM. In vivo evidences for reduced binding of low-density lipoproteins to receptors as a cause of primary moderate hypercholesterolemia. J Clin Invest 78: 1410–1440, 1986.[Web of Science][Medline]
  42. Vitols S, Gahrton G, Peterson C. Significance of the low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor pathway for the in vitro accumulation of a AD-32 incorporated into LDL in normal and leukemic white blood cells. Cancer Treat Res 68: 515–520, 1984.




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
103/4/1166    most recent
01176.2006v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vinagre, C. G. C.
Right arrow Articles by Maranhão, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vinagre, C. G. C.
Right arrow Articles by Maranhão, R. C.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the American Physiological Society.