|
|
||||||||
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
A classical example has been shown with "hydreliox" (6), probably due in part to the polar nature of dissolved hydrogen in the final mix.
Thus it seems probable that apart from the physical or electrolytic changes in solute behavior affecting the linearity of Henry's law, other mechanisms, such as gas-solute interfaces found in the presence of macroscopic bubbles or micronuclei or even the surface tension of such interfaces, play an important role (3).
With helium, even local temperature gradients are likely to influence the driving forces of Henry's law.
Recent experiments conducted in divers (2) show that changes in fluid compartments induce concomitant changes in surface tension of body fluids that will widely affect the radius of pre-existing or de novo gas (micro)bubbles (5) and thus the contact surface and finally dissolution speed of gases (4).
In conclusion, it is undeniable that the simple linear concept of Henry's law is probably untrue, even in relatively "simple" circumstances and certainly in situations where "exotic gas" mixes are breathed. We cannot agree more with Arieli (1). We would like to stress, however, that, as the exact nature of these changes is extremely difficult to model, one has to consider that these changes can occur in both ways; therefore, the observation that nitrox dives seem to be safer than air dives is possibly also due to other factors, rather than this hypothesis alone.
FOOTNOTES
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: C. Balestra, 91, Ave. C. Schaller, Brussels, Belgium B-1160 (e-mail: balestra{at}daneurope.org)
REFERENCES
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |