|
|
||||||||
1-induced endothelial barrier dysfunction involves Smad2-dependent p38 activation and subsequent RhoA activation
Vascular Research Laboratory, Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Brown Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island
Submitted 1 December 2005 ; accepted in final form 24 April 2006
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1-increased endothelial permeability; however, the mechanism by which these pathways cooperate is not clear. In this study, we hypothesized that TGF-
1-induced changes in endothelial monolayer permeability and in p38 and RhoA activation are dependent on Smad2 signaling. We assessed the role of Smad2 in p38 activation and the role of p38 in RhoA activation by TGF-
1. We found that TGF-
1 caused Smad2 phosphorylation between 0.5 and 1 h of exposure in endothelial cells. Knockdown of Smad2 protein prevented TGF-
1-induced p38 activation and endothelial barrier dysfunction. Furthermore, TGF-
1-enhanced RhoA activation was dependent on p38 activation. Inhibition of the RhoA-Rho kinase signaling pathway blunted TGF-
1-induced adherens junction disruption and focal adhesion complex formation. In addition, depletion of heat shock protein 27, a downstream signaling molecule of p38, did not prevent TGF-
1-induced endothelial barrier dysfunction. Finally, inhibition of de novo protein expression blunted TGF-
1-induced RhoA activation and endothelial barrier dysfunction. Our data indicate that TGF-
1 induces endothelial barrier dysfunction involving Smad2-dependent p38 activation, resulting in RhoA activation by possible transcriptional regulation. heat shock protein 27; endothelium; cell signaling; endothelial monolayer permeability; small GTPases
30% despite modern intensive care (54). A number of studies have demonstrated that transforming growth factor (TGF)-
1 plays a critical role in the development of lung edema during lung injury. TGF-
1 is elevated in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (19) and of rats with acute lung injury caused by overexpression of IL-1
(31). In addition, expression of several TGF-
1-inducible genes is enhanced in bleomycin-induced lung edema (29). Inhibition of TGF-
1 signaling by soluble chimeric TGF-
1 receptor or by
v
6 integrin deficiency protects mice from bleomycin-induced lung edema (42), whereas overexpression of active TGF-
1 in rat lungs induces perivascular and peribronchial edema (47). Furthermore, TGF-
1 directly increases monolayer permeability of cultured pulmonary artery endothelial cells (PAEC) (8, 10, 21, 28) and alveolar epithelial cells (42). Thus understanding the signaling mechanism(s) by which TGF-
1 induces endothelial barrier dysfunction may facilitate development of an effective therapy for diseases with increased lung vascular permeability. We hypothesized that TGF-
1-induced changes in endothelial monolayer permeability and in p38 and RhoA activation are dependent on Smad2 signaling.
TGF-
1, a member of the TGF-
family, is secreted as a latent, inactive complex composed of TGF-
1 homodimers, latency-associated peptide, and latent TGF-
binding protein (3, 4). The latent TGF-
1 complex is activated on cleavage of the latency-associated peptide subunit by a number of molecules, including plasmin, reactive oxygen species, thrombospondin-1, and
v
6 (3, 11, 41). The activated TGF-
1 binds to and recruits cell surface TGF-
type I and type II receptors, triggering phosphorylation, nuclear translocation, and transcriptional activation of Smad2/3 (14, 37, 46). In addition, TGF-
1 modulates a number of other signaling pathways, including mitogen-activated protein kinases (such as ERK1/2, JNK, and p38), RhoA GTPase, protein kinase C
, phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase, and protein phosphatase 1 and 2A (15, 33).
Endothelial barrier function is modulated by a balance between endothelial contractile forces and cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesive forces (16). Actin stress fibers contribute to cell contraction, whereas intercellular junctions and focal adhesion complexes contribute to cell attachments and adhesions (16). Rho GTPases are a family of small GTP-binding proteins that regulate the organization of actin cytoskeleton and intercellular junctions (43, 55). RhoA is an important mediator of both basal endothelial barrier function (24) and agonist-induced endothelial barrier dysfunction (36, 50, 56). Recent studies have shown that RhoA activation is required for TGF-
1-increased endothelial permeability (8, 10). p38 also plays an important role in TGF-
1-induced endothelial barrier dysfunction (21). TGF-
1 initiates numerous cellular responses by both Smad-dependent and -independent pathways (15). Recent studies demonstrated that ALK5, a TGF-
type I receptor, and Smad4 are required for TGF-
1-increased endothelial permeability (7). In this study, we investigated the signaling mechanism by which TGF-
1 induced endothelial barrier dysfunction via p38 and RhoA. We demonstrated that TGF-
1 induced p38 activation via Smad2, resulting in subsequent RhoA activation and endothelial barrier dysfunction. In addition, TGF-
1-induced RhoA activation and endothelial barrier dysfunction were dependent on de novo protein expression. Thus our findings are the first to demonstrate that TGF-
1-induced RhoA activation is mediated by Smad2-dependent p38 activation.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 was obtained from R & D Systems, (Minneapolis, MN). Y-27632 was purchased from CalBiochem (San Diego, CA). SB-203580 was obtained from SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals (Philadelphia, PA). Cycloheximide and actinomycin D were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Antibodies directed against RhoA,
-catenin, vinculin, Smad3, p115Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEF), and Rho guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors (GDI)-
were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Antibodies directed against p38, phospho-p38 (Thr180/Tyr182), heat shock protein (HSP) 27, phospho-HSP27 (Ser82), Smad2, phospho-Smad2 (Ser465/467), Smad4, TGF-activated protein kinase 1 (TAK1), phospho-TAK1 (Thr184), phospho-TAK1 (Thr187), MAP kinase kinase (MKK) 3, MKK6, phospho-MKK3/6 (Ser189/207), MKK4, and phospho-MKK4 (Ser80), and phospho-MKK3/6 control cell extracts were from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA). Antibody directed against p190Rho GTPase-activating proteins (GAP) was purchased from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA). Smad2 small-interfering (si)RNA (Smad2 SMARTpool siRNA) (catalog no. M-003561, accession no. NM_005901) was purchased from Upstate (Charlottesville, VA). It contains four pooled siRNA duplexes (21 nucleotides) with "UU" overhangs and 5' phosphate on the antisense strand. The sequences of this siRNA pool are not released from Upstate; HSP27 siRNA (catalog no. sc-29350) was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. It is a pool of three target-specific 20- to 25-nucleotide siRNA duplexes designed to knockdown HSP27 gene expression. The mRNA sequences for three pool siRNAs are residues 228246, GAGUGGUCGCAGUGGUUAG; residues 426444, GACGAGCUGACGGUCAAGA; residues 625643, CCACGCAGUCCAACGAGAU. Control (nonsilencing) siRNA was purchased from Qiagen (Valencia, CA). pGST-C21 (GST-Rho-binding domain of Rhotekin, GST-Rhotekin-RBD) construct was a generous gift from Dr. J. Collard (Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Knockdown of endogenous Smad2 and HSP27. Smad2 and HSP27 siRNA directly against respective human mRNA was ineffective in suppressing protein expression of either Smad2 or HSP27 in bovine PAEC (data not shown). Thus HUVEC were used for all experiments involving siRNA. Nonspecific, nonsilencing siRNA duplex, designed by Qiagen to not alter the expression level of any proteins, was used as a control treatment. HUVEC were grown to 60% confluence and transfected with 40 nM control siRNA, Smad2 siRNA, or HSP27 siRNA using Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer's protocol. At 48 h posttransfection, cells were used for further analysis.
Endothelial monolayer permeability assay. Changes in endothelial monolayer permeability were assessed by measuring electrical resistance across monolayers using the electrical cell impedance sensor technique (Applied Biophysics), as our laboratory previously described (36). Briefly, equivalent numbers of endothelial cells were plated on collagen-coated gold electrode arrays (8W10E) and grown to confluence in growth medium. Cells were then treated as described, and electrical resistance across monolayers was recorded over time.
RhoA GTPase activity assay. RhoA GTPase activity was measured using pull-down assay, as our laboratory previously described (36). GTP-bound RhoA (GTP-RhoA) was purified from lysates containing equal amounts of proteins with GST-Rhotekin-RBD agarose beads. The levels of precipitated RhoA (GTP-RhoA) and total RhoA in corresponding crude lysates were assessed by immunoblot analysis. RhoA activity was presented as the GTP-RhoA relative to the total RhoA.
Gel electrophoresis and immunoblot analysis. Lysates were solubilized in Laemmli buffer, and proteins were resolved using SDS-PAGE and then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes and immunoblotted with indicated antibodies, as previously described (5).
Immunofluorescence confocal microscopy.
Confluent PAEC on coverslips were treated as described and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and rendered permeable with 0.1% Triton X-100. Adherens junctions and focal adhesion complexes were stained with antibodies directly against the junctional protein
-catenin and focal adhesion complex component vinculin, respectively. The primary antibody was detected by subsequent staining of the slides with species-specific Texas red-conjugated secondary antibody. Images were visualized by fluorescence laser scanning confocal microscopy at x630 magnification and recorded, as our laboratory previously described (36).
Data analysis. All experiments were performed at least in triplicate. Data are presented as means ± SE. ANOVA tests were used to analyze differences among groups. Differences among means were considered significant when P < 0.05.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1-induced endothelial barrier dysfunction.
TGF-
1 initiates numerous cellular responses through both Smad-dependent and -independent pathways (15). Recently, it has been shown that ALK5 and Smad4 are involved in TGF-
1-increased endothelial monolayer permeability (7). Because ALK5 activation can cause Smad2/3 activation (35), we first tested whether Smad2 was activated by TGF-
1 in endothelial cells. We noted that TGF-
1 dose-dependently increased endothelial monolayer permeability in PAEC with a maximal effect at 1 ng/ml (data not shown); thus this dose was used throughout the study. PAEC treated with TGF-
1 demonstrated an elevated level of phosphorylated, activated Smad2 at 0.5 and 1 h of exposure (Fig. 1A). The level of phosphorylated Smad2 was significantly diminished by 4 h and returned to basal level by 24 h following exposure to TGF-
1 (Fig. 1A). Next, we examined whether Smad2 was required for TGF-
1-induced endothelial barrier dysfunction by knocking down Smad2 protein expression using siRNA. Equivalent numbers of HUVEC were transfected with control siRNA or Smad2 siRNA for 48 h, and depletion of Smad2 protein was confirmed by immunoblot analysis (Fig. 1B). Neither Smad3 nor Smad4 protein levels were altered by Smad2 siRNA (Fig. 1B). As shown in Fig. 1C, TGF-
1 significantly decreased electrical resistance across endothelial monolayers transiently transfected with control siRNA. This effect was prevented by depletion of Smad2 protein, suggesting a requirement of Smad2 in TGF-
1-induced increases in endothelial monolayer permeability.
|
1 induces p38 activation via Smad2.
TGF-
1 has been shown to activate p38, and this activation is required for TGF-
1-induced endothelial barrier dysfunction (21). Because Smad2 was required for TGF-
1-induced endothelial barrier dysfunction, we next assessed whether p38 activation was dependent on Smad2 in response to TGF-
1. HUVEC transfected with control siRNA or Smad2 siRNA for 48 h were treated with vehicle or TGF-
1 for 1 h. As shown in Fig. 2A, the levels of active p38 were not significantly different between control siRNA and Smad2 siRNA transfected cells exposed to vehicle. p38 activation upon TGF-
1 exposure, however, was significantly attenuated in endothelial cells transfected with Smad2 siRNA, demonstrating a requirement for Smad2 in TGF-
1-induced p38 activation.
|
1 and bone morphogenetic protein 4 in yeast (57). To test whether TAK1/MKK3/6 pathway and MKK4 were involved in TGF-
1-induced p38 activation, we assessed activation of TAK1, MKK3/6, and MKK4 in response to TGF-
1 in endothelial cells by measuring phosphorylation of these proteins. As shown in Fig. 2B, MKK3/6 was not phosphorylated by TGF-
1. Similarly, neither TAK1 nor MKK4 was phosphorylated by TGF-
1 in either PAEC or HUVEC (data not shown), suggesting that these signaling pathways are not involved.
p38 mediates TGF-
1 activation of RhoA.
RhoA is a key factor involved in TGF-
1-increased endothelial monolayer permeability (8, 10). Because both p38 and RhoA were activated by TGF-
1, we next analyzed whether there was any cross talk between these pathways. To test whether inhibition of p38 altered RhoA activity in response to TGF-
1, PAEC were preincubated with vehicle or the p38 inhibitor SB-203580 for 1 h and then exposed to TGF-
1 in the presence or absence of SB-203580 for 2 h. We found that p38 inhibition prevented TGF-
1 activation of RhoA (Fig. 3A), suggesting that TGF-
1-induced-RhoA activation is dependent on p38 activity. To determine whether p38 activation by TGF-
1 was dependent on RhoA signaling through Rho kinase, PAEC were preincubated with vehicle or the Rho kinase inhibitor Y-27632 for 1 h and then exposed to TGF-
1 in the presence or absence of Y-27632 for 0.5, 1, and 2 h. Inhibition of Rho kinase did not significantly affect TGF-
1 activation of p38 at 0.5 h (data not shown), 1 h (Fig. 3B), and 2 h (data not shown). Taken together, these results suggest that RhoA activation by TGF-
1 is dependent on p38 activity.
|
1-induced reorganization of adherens junctions and focal adhesion complexes.
RhoA/Rho kinase signaling pathway has been shown to be important in TGF-
1-induced endothelial barrier dysfunction (8, 10). Endothelial barrier integrity is maintained by the opposing forces generated by stress fibers, intercellular junctions, and focal adhesion complexes (16). RhoA/Rho kinase signaling is important for TGF-
1-induced stress fiber formation (10). In this study, we assessed the role of RhoA/Rho kinase signaling in TGF-
1-mediated reorganization of adherens junctions and focal adhesion complexes. Confluent PAEC were preincubated with vehicle or Y-27632 for 1 h and then exposed to TGF-
1 in the presence or absence of Y-27632 for 3 h. We found that Rho kinase inhibition blunted TGF-
1-induced disruption of adherens junctions (Fig. 4A) and formation of focal adhesion complexes (Fig. 4B). These results suggest that RhoA/Rho kinase signaling pathway activation is important for TGF-
1-induced reorganization of adherens junctions and focal adhesion complexes.
|
1-induced endothelial barrier dysfunction is independent of HSP27.
HSP27, a downstream target of p38, has been implicated in stress fiber formation and focal adhesion assembly in airway smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells (1, 2, 27, 34, 38, 44). We next tested the effects of TGF-
1 on HSP27 activation by measuring changes in phosphorylation of HSP27 at serine 82. PAEC treated with TGF-
1 demonstrated a significant increase in HSP27 phosphorylation following 1, 4, and 24 h of exposure (Fig. 5A). We further found that TGF-
1-increased HSP27 phosphorylation was completely abolished upon p38 inhibition (Fig. 5B), suggesting that TGF-
1-induced HSP27 activation is dependent on p38. To determine whether HSP27 was required for TGF-
1-induced endothelial barrier dysfunction, equivalent numbers of HUVEC were transfected with control siRNA or HSP27 siRNA for 48 h, and depletion of HSP27 protein was confirmed by immunoblot analysis (Fig. 6A). As shown in Fig. 6B, TGF-
1 increased endothelial monolayer permeability to a similar extent in control siRNA and HSP27 siRNA transfected cells, suggesting that HSP27 is not involved in TGF-
1-increased endothelial permeability.
|
|
1-induced RhoA activation and endothelial barrier dysfunction requires de novo protein synthesis.
Protein synthesis has been shown to be required for TGF-
1-enhanced myosin light chain phosphorylation in endothelial cells (21). To directly address whether gene transcription and protein translation were important for TGF-
1-induced endothelial barrier dysfunction, equivalent numbers of PAEC were preincubated with vehicle or an inhibitor of transcription, actinomycin D, or an inhibitor of translation, cycloheximide, for 1 h and then exposed to TGF-
1 in the presence or absence of either inhibitor for 20 h. The effect of actinomycin D or cycloheximide on basal endothelial monolayer permeability was dependent on the dosage used and treatment time. High concentrations of actinomycin D (0.5 µg/ml) and cycloheximide (10 µg/ml) significantly increased monolayer permeability of endothelial cells exposed for 6 h and longer (data not shown). Low concentrations of actinomycin D (25 ng/ml) (data not shown) and cycloheximide (0.5 µg/ml) (Fig. 7A), however, did not significantly alter basal endothelial monolayer permeability up to 20 h of exposure. TGF-
1-increased endothelial monolayer permeability was blunted by both 0.5 µg/ml cycloheximide (Fig. 7A) and 25 ng/ml actinomycin D (data not shown). These results suggest that de novo protein expression is required for this process.
|
1-induced p38 activation and RhoA activation. PAEC were preincubated with vehicle, actinomycin D, or cycloheximide for 1 h and then exposed to TGF-
1 in the presence or absence of either inhibitor for 2 h, and the activities of p38 and RhoA were assessed. As shown in Fig. 7B, neither inhibitor altered basal RhoA activity; yet both significantly blunted TGF-
1-elevated RhoA activity, suggesting that TGF-
1-induced RhoA activation requires newly synthesized protein(s). However, to our surprise, inhibition of protein synthesis with cycloheximide dramatically enhanced both basal and TGF-
1-stimulated p38 activities (Fig. 7C). Similar results were observed when cells were treated with actinomycin D (data not shown). These results suggest that TGF-
1 activation of RhoA requires de novo protein synthesis downstream from p38.
RhoA activity is modulated by RhoGDI
, p190RhoGAP, and p115RhoGEF (9, 23, 24, 26, 39). To determine whether p38 activates RhoA upon TGF-
1 stimulation by altering the expression of these modulators, PAEC and HUVEC were treated with vehicle or TGF-
1 for 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 24 h, and the protein levels of RhoGDI
, p190RhoGAP, and p115RhoGEF were assessed. None of these protein levels were altered by TGF-
1 (data not shown). In addition, the protein levels of RhoGDI
and p190RhoGAP were also not changed in endothelial cells exposed to 0.5 µg/ml cycloheximide or 25 ng/ml actinomycin D for 2 h (data not shown). These results suggest that p38 activates RhoA upon TGF-
1 stimulation, probably by acting on the expression of some unidentified protein(s), which regulates activities of RhoA modulators.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 induces endothelial barrier dysfunction (28) in a manner dependent on p38 (21) and RhoA (8, 10). However, the mechanism(s) by which these signaling pathways cooperate have not been investigated. In this study, we hypothesized that TGF-
1-induced changes in endothelial monolayer permeability and in p38 and RhoA activation are dependent on Smad2 signaling. We demonstrated that Smad2 activation is required for TGF-
1-induced p38 activation and endothelial barrier dysfunction. Furthermore, we found that TGF-
1-induced p38 activation leads to RhoA activation and subsequent endothelial barrier dysfunction. In addition, we demonstrated that TGF-
1-induced RhoA activation and endothelial barrier dysfunction require de novo protein synthesis. These results suggest that Smad2-dependent p38 activation and subsequent RhoA activation plays a central role in TGF-
1-induced endothelial barrier dysfunction.
TGF-
1 initiates numerous cellular responses by both Smad-dependent and -independent pathways (15). It has been suggested that Smad2/3 activation is required for TGF-
1-induced actin stress fiber formation in epithelial cells (45) and Swiss 3T3 cells (53). Smad2/3 are activated on ALK5 activation by TGF-
1 in endothelial cells (35). Recently, Birukova et al. (7) have shown that both ALK5 and Smad4 are involved in TGF-
1-induced endothelial barrier dysfunction. Our study demonstrated that depletion of Smad2 protein prevented TGF-
1-induced endothelial barrier dysfunction. Taken together, these results suggest that TGF-
1 regulates endothelial monolayer permeability through a Smad-dependent mechanism.
Mammalian MAP kinases are activated by MKKs via dual phosphorylation on threonine and tyrosine. Among seven identified MKKs, MKK3, 4, and 6 are highly selective for p38 activation (13). TAK1 activates p38 through MKK3 and MKK6 (40). TAK1 is activated in response to TGF-
1 in yeast (57). We demonstrated that neither TAK1 nor MKK4 nor MKK3/6 was phosphorylated (activated) by TGF-
1 in either PAEC or HUVEC, suggesting that these signaling pathways are not important for TGF-
1-induced p38 activation.
Activation of p38 by Rho GTPases has been reported (17, 25). However, others have demonstrated that p38 activation is independent of Rho GTPases (60). In this study, inhibition of Rho kinase did not alter the level of p38 activity upon TGF-
1 stimulation, suggesting that RhoA/Rho kinase signaling does not regulate TGF-
1-induced p38 activation in endothelial cells.
The role of Smad proteins in TGF-
1-induced p38 activation is controversial. Yu et al. (59) have shown that TGF-
1-induced p38 activation is independent of Smad in mouse mammary epithelial cells. However, others have demonstrated that Smad signaling is critical for TGF-
1-induced p38 activation in pancreatic cells (49) and murine hepatocytes (58). These results suggest that the role of Smad in TGF-
1-induced p38 activation may depend on cell type. In this study, we found that depletion of Smad2 protein prevented TGF-
1-induced p38 activation, demonstrating that Smad2 is required for TGF-
1-induced p38 activation in endothelial cells.
RhoA regulates endothelial basal barrier function and agonist-induced endothelial barrier dysfunction by increasing stress fiber formation and by disrupting intercellular junctions (24, 36, 50, 51, 56). RhoA has also been implicated in TGF-
1-induced stress fiber formation and adherens junction disruption in epithelial cells (6, 17, 45). Recent studies have shown that RhoA activation plays an important role in TGF-
1-induced stress fiber formation and endothelial barrier dysfunction (8, 10). In this study, we demonstrated that RhoA/Rho kinase signaling activation is required for TGF-
1-induced disruption of adherens junctions and formation of focal adhesion complexes, suggesting that reorganization of these structures contributes to TGF-
1-induced endothelial barrier dysfunction.
The mechanism underlying TGF-
1-induced RhoA activation has not been well defined. Smad2/3 activation is required for TGF-
1-induced RhoA activation in epithelial cells (45) and Swiss 3T3 cells (53). In this study, we found that TGF-
1 activated RhoA via Smad2-dependent p38 activation. In addition, both actinomycin D and cycloheximide attenuated TGF-
1-induced RhoA activation, suggesting a requirement of de novo protein synthesis in this process. The effect of inhibition of protein expression on TGF-
1 activation of RhoA indicates two possibilities. First, it is possible that newly synthesized protein(s) is required for TGF-
1-induced p38 activation. However, to our surprise, our data actually refuted this possibility, due to the exacerbation of TGF-
1 activation of p38 by actinomycin D and cycloheximide. Second, it is possible that TGF-
1 activation of RhoA requires de novo protein synthesis downstream from p38. Therefore, although p38 is activated by actinomycin D or cycloheximide, RhoA remains inactive due to inhibition of synthesis of some protein(s) necessary for RhoA activation.
RhoA is activated by GEFs and inhibited by GAPs and GDIs (48). In this study, we found that TGF-
1 did not alter protein expression of RhoGDI
, p190RhoGAP, and p115RhoGEF, known modulators of RhoA (9, 23, 24, 26, 39). Thus we speculate that p38 activates RhoA upon TGF-
1 exposure by controlling the expression of some unidentified protein(s), which regulates activities of RhoA modulators. RhoA activation is also regulated by prenylation and methylation. We have shown that blocking RhoA methylation blunted the level of RhoA activity by increasing RhoGDI
binding (23). Others have reported that cycloheximide treatment inhibits RhoA prenylation by preventing cyclin E expression, which in turn prevents RhoA activation (20). RhoA is also inactivated by glucosylation. Whether prenylation, methylation, or glucosylation are involved in p38-mediated RhoA activation by TGF-
1 requires further investigation.
TGF-
1-induced endothelial barrier dysfunction was completely prevented by p38 inhibition (21) but partially blunted by inhibition of RhoA/Rho kinase (8, 10); thus we speculated that other signaling pathway(s) downstream from p38 contribute to TGF-
1-increased endothelial permeability. In this study, we have investigated the effect of HSP27, a downstream signaling molecule of p38, in this process and demonstrated that it is not involved in TGF-
1-induced increase in endothelial permeability. Rac1 and Cdc42 have been reported to regulate endothelial permeability (18, 32, 36, 52, 56). Rac1 is involved in TGF-
1-induced actin reorganization in hepatoma cells (30). Cdc42 is involved in TGF-
1-induced mobilization of actin cytoskeleton in human prostate carcinoma cells (17). Further studies are needed to determine the involvement of Rac1 and Cdc42 in TGF-
1-induced endothelial permeability.
In summary, cooperation among multiple signaling molecules is important in TGF-
1-induced endothelial barrier dysfunction as described in Fig. 8. Our findings demonstrate a novel signaling pathway by which TGF-
1 promotes p38 activation and subsequent RhoA/Rho kinase signaling activation via Smad2, resulting in endothelial barrier dysfunction.
|
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Some of these results were presented at the American Thoracic Society International Conference, May 2126, 2004, Orlando, Florida, and were published in abstract form in Am J Respir Crit Care Med 169: A415, 2004.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
activation. J Cell Sci 116: 217224, 2003.
. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 1: 353363, 1996.[CrossRef][Medline]
1 mediated epithelial to mesenchymal transdifferentiation through a RhoA-dependent mechanism. Mol Biol Cell 12: 2736, 2001.
1-induced pulmonary endothelial permeability. FEBS Lett 579: 40314037, 2005.[CrossRef][Medline]
-induced lung vascular barrier dysfunction. J Cell Physiol 204: 934947, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-induced pulmonary endothelial cytoskeletal reorganization and permeability. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 288: L294L306, 2005.
1 in vivo. Cell 93: 11591170, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
responses. Cell 95: 737740, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
family signalling. Nature 425: 577584, 2003.[CrossRef][Medline]
-induced mobilization of actin cytoskeleton requires signaling by small GTPases Cdc42 and RhoA. Mol Biol Cell 13: 902914, 2002.
. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 28: 499503, 2003.
1 increases MLC phosphorylation and endothelial monolayer permeability. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 282: L146L154, 2002.
regulates endothelial basal barrier function through modulation of RhoA GTPase activity. Exp Cell Res 308: 407421, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-induced p115RhoGEF phosphorylation signals endothelial cytoskeleton rearrangement. J Biol Chem 278: 2879328798, 2003.
1: role of contraction. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 276: L582L595, 1999.
1-mediated activations of c-Src and Rac1 modulate levels of cyclins and p27(Kip1) CDK inhibitor in hepatoma cells replated on fibronectin. Biochim Biophys Acta 1743: 151161, 2005.[Medline]
induces acute lung injury and chronic repair leading to pulmonary fibrosis. J Clin Invest 107: 15291536, 2001.[Web of Science][Medline]
stabilizes elastin mRNA by a pathway requiring active smads, protein kinase C-
, and p38. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 26: 183188, 2002.
receptor function in the endothelium. Cardiovasc Res 65: 599608, 2005.
signal transduction. Annu Rev Biochem 67: 753791, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
signals Rho-guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor phosphorylation and rho activation and regulates the endothelial cell barrier function. J Biol Chem 276: 2261422620, 2001.
6 binds and activates latent TGF-
1: a mechanism for regulating pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis. Cell 96: 319328, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
1 is a critical mediator of acute lung injury. J Clin Invest 107: 15371544, 2001.[Web of Science][Medline]
1-mediated stress fiber formation. J Biol Chem 276: 1536215368, 2001.
signaling from cell membrane to the nucleus. Cell 113: 685700, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
1 induces prolonged severe fibrosis in rat lung. J Clin Invest 100: 768776, 1997.[Web of Science][Medline]
requires MKK6-p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling downstream of Smad signaling. J Biol Chem 278: 1104111049, 2003.
. J Biol Chem 280: 1144811457, 2005.
-induced reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton and cell-cell junctions by Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 in human endothelial cells. J Cell Physiol 176: 150165, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
signal transduction. Science 270: 20082011, 1995.
-induced apoptosis is mediated by Smad-dependent expression of GADD45b through p38 activation. J Biol Chem 278: 4300143007, 2003.
receptor-activated p38 MAP kinase mediates Smad-independent TGF-
responses. EMBO J 21: 37493759, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
B pathways. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 284: C1397C1404, 2003.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Antonov, C. Snead, B. Gorshkov, G. N. Antonova, A. D. Verin, and J. D. Catravas Heat Shock Protein 90 Inhibitors Protect and Restore Pulmonary Endothelial Barrier Function Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., November 1, 2008; 39(5): 551 - 559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Lu Transforming growth factor-{beta}1 protects against pulmonary artery endothelial cell apoptosis via ALK5 Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, July 1, 2008; 295(1): L123 - L133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Peng, B. Zhang, D. Wu, A. J. Ingram, B. Gao, and J. C. Krepinsky TGF{beta}-induced RhoA activation and fibronectin production in mesangial cells require caveolae Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, July 1, 2008; 295(1): F153 - F164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. H. Lee, U. S. Kayyali, A. M. Sousa, T. Rajan, R. J. Lechleider, and R. M. Day Transforming Growth Factor-beta1 Effects on Endothelial Monolayer Permeability Involve Focal Adhesion Kinase/Src Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., October 1, 2007; 37(4): 485 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Singleton, L. Moreno-Vinasco, S. Sammani, S. L. Wanderling, J. Moss, and J. G. N. Garcia Attenuation of Vascular Permeability by Methylnaltrexone: Role of mOP-R and S1P3 Transactivation Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., August 1, 2007; 37(2): 222 - 231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-L. Yeh, D.-Y. Lu, C.-J. Lin, H.-C. Liou, and W.-M. Fu Inhibition of Hypoxia-Induced Increase of Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability by YC-1 through the Antagonism of HIF-1{alpha} Accumulation and VEGF Expression Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2007; 72(2): 440 - 449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Lu, E. O. Harrington, J. Newton, M. Jankowich, and S. Rounds Inhibition of ICMT Induces Endothelial Cell Apoptosis through GRP94 Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., July 1, 2007; 37(1): 20 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. L. Volger, J. O. Fledderus, N. Kisters, R. D. Fontijn, P. D. Moerland, J. Kuiper, T. J. van Berkel, A.-P. J.J. Bijnens, M. J.A.P. Daemen, H. Pannekoek, et al. Distinctive Expression of Chemokines and Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} Signaling in Human Arterial Endothelium during Atherosclerosis Am. J. Pathol., July 1, 2007; 171(1): 326 - 337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Su, M. Hodnett, N. Wu, A. Atakilit, C. Kosinski, M. Godzich, X. Z. Huang, J. K. Kim, J. A. Frank, M. A. Matthay, et al. Integrin {alpha}vbeta5 Regulates Lung Vascular Permeability and Pulmonary Endothelial Barrier Function Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., March 1, 2007; 36(3): 377 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |