Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 99: 2363-2368, 2005. First published September 1, 2005; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00083.2005
8750-7587/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/6/2363    most recent
00083.2005v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sandifer, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sandifer, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, R. E.

Potent effects of aerosol compared with intravenous treprostinil on the pulmonary circulation

Brett L. Sandifer,1,3 Kenneth L. Brigham,1,2,3 E. Clinton Lawrence,1,3 David Mottola,4 Chris Cuppels,1,2 and Richard E. Parker1,2

1Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, 2Center for Translational Research in the Lung, and 3McKelvey Center for Lung Transplantation, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; and 4United Therapeutics Corporation, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

Submitted 24 January 2005 ; accepted in final form 20 July 2005

Inhaled vasodilator therapy for pulmonary hypertension may decrease the systemic side effects commonly observed with systemic administration. Inhaled medications only reach ventilated areas of the lung, so local vasodilation may improve ventilation-perfusion matching and oxygenation. We compared the effects of intravenous vs. aerosolized treprostinil on pulmonary and systemic hemodynamics in an unanesthetized sheep model of sustained acute pulmonary hypertension. Acute, stable pulmonary hypertension was induced in instrumented unanesthetized sheep by infusing a PGH2 analog, U-44069. The sheep were then administered identical doses of treprostinil either intravenously or by aerosol. Systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics were recorded during each administration. Both intravenous and aerosol delivery of treprostinil reduced pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary arterial pressure, but the effect was significantly greater with aerosol delivery (P < 0.05). Aerosol delivery of treprostinil had minimal effects on systemic hemodynamics, whereas intravenous delivery increased heart rate and cardiac output and decreased left atrial pressure and systemic blood pressure. Aerosol delivery of the prostacyclin analog treprostinil has a greater vasodilatory effect in the lung with minimal alterations in systemic hemodynamics compared with intravenous delivery of the drug. We speculate that this may result from treprostinil stimulated production of vasodilatory mediators from pulmonary epithelium.

pulmonary hypertension; transcription factor activator protein-1; epoprostenol



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. E. Parker, 615 Michael St., Suite 250, Whitehead Research Bldg., Atlanta, GA 30322 (e-mail: reparke{at}emory.edu)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Physiological Society.