Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 99: 1958-1964, 2005; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00052.2005
8750-7587/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giesbrecht, G. G.
Right arrow Articles by Steinman, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giesbrecht, G. G.
Right arrow Articles by Steinman, A. M.

Thermal effects of dorsal head immersion in cold water on nonshivering humans

Gordon G. Giesbrecht, Tamara L. Lockhart, Gerald K. Bristow, and Allan M. Steinman

Laboratory for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Health, Leisure and Human Performance Research Institute, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada

Submitted 18 January 2005 ; accepted in final form 11 July 2005

Personal floatation devices maintain either a semirecumbent flotation posture with the head and upper chest out of the water or a horizontal flotation posture with the dorsal head and whole body immersed. The contribution of dorsal head and upper chest immersion to core cooling in cold water was isolated when the confounding effect of shivering heat production was inhibited with meperidine (Demerol, 2.5 mg/kg). Six male volunteers were immersed four times for up to 60 min, or until esophageal temperature = 34°C. An insulated hoodless dry suit or two different personal floatation devices were used to create four conditions: 1) body insulated, head out; 2) body insulated, dorsal head immersed; 3) body exposed, head (and upper chest) out; and 4) body exposed, dorsal head (and upper chest) immersed. When the body was insulated, dorsal head immersion did not affect core cooling rate (1.1°C/h) compared with head-out conditions (0.7°C/h). When the body was exposed, however, the rate of core cooling increased by 40% from 3.6°C/h with the head out to 5.0°C/h with the dorsal head and upper chest immersed (P < 0.01). Heat loss from the dorsal head and upper chest was approximately proportional to the extra surface area that was immersed (~10%). The exaggerated core cooling during dorsal head immersion (40% increase) may result from the extra heat loss affecting a smaller thermal core due to intense thermal stimulation of the body and head and resultant peripheral vasoconstriction. Dorsal head and upper chest immersion in cold water increases the rate of core cooling and decreases potential survival time.

hypothermia; survival; heat loss; personal floatation device; thermal model



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: G. Giesbrecht, 211 Max Bell Centre, Univ. of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada R3T 2N2 (e-mail: giesbrec{at}cc.umanitoba.ca)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
T. Pretorius, G. K. Bristow, A. M. Steinman, and G. G. Giesbrecht
Thermal effects of whole head submersion in cold water on nonshivering humans
J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2006; 101(2): 669 - 675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Physiological Society.