HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (21) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Maluf, K. S. Articles by Enoka, R. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Maluf, K. S. Articles by Enoka, R. M.

INVITED REVIEW

Task failure during fatiguing contractions performed by humans

Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado

By comparing the physiological adjustments that occur when two similar fatiguing contractions are performed to failure, it is possible to identify mechanisms that limit the duration of the more difficult task. This approach has been used to study two fatiguing contractions, referred to as the force and position tasks, which differed in the type of feedback given to the subject and the amount of support provided by the surroundings. Even though the two tasks required a similar net muscle torque during submaximal isometric contractions, the duration that the position task could be sustained was consistently much briefer than that for the force task. The position task involved a greater rate of increase in EMG activity and more marked changes in motor unit recruitment and rate coding compared with the force task. These observations are consistent with the hypothesis that the motor unit pool was recruited more rapidly during the position task. The difference in motor unit behavior appeared to be caused by variation in synaptic input, likely involving heightened sensitivity of the stretch reflex during the position task. Upon repeat performances of the two fatiguing contractions, some subjects were able to increase the time to failure for the force task but not the position task. Furthermore, the time to failure for the position task could be influenced by the postural demands associated with maintaining the position of the limb, and the difference in the two durations was enhanced when the postural activity evoked a pressor response. These observations indicate that the difference in the duration of the two fatiguing contractions was attributable to differences in the control strategy used to sustain the tasks and the magnitude of the associated postural activity.

muscle fatigue; maximal force capacity; motor unit; reflexes; posture

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Farina, A. Holobar, M. Gazzoni, D. Zazula, R. Merletti, and R. M. Enoka Adjustments Differ Among Low-Threshold Motor Units During Intermittent, Isometric Contractions J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2009; 101(1): 350 - 359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. K. Hunter, T. Yoon, J. Farinella, E. E. Griffith, and A. V. Ng Time to task failure and muscle activation vary with load type for a submaximal fatiguing contraction with the lower leg J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2008; 105(2): 463 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. H. Dobkin Fatigue Versus Activity-Dependent Fatigability in Patients With Central or Peripheral Motor Impairments Neurorehabil Neural Repair, April 1, 2008; 22(2): 105 - 110. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Klass, M. Levenez, R. M. Enoka, and J. Duchateau Spinal Mechanisms Contribute to Differences in the Time to Failure of Submaximal Fatiguing Contractions Performed With Different Loads J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2008; 99(3): 1096 - 1104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Taylor and S. C. Gandevia A comparison of central aspects of fatigue in submaximal and maximal voluntary contractions J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2008; 104(2): 542 - 550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Enoka and J. Duchateau Muscle fatigue: what, why and how it influences muscle function J. Physiol., January 1, 2008; 586(1): 11 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. K. Barry and R. M. Enoka The neurobiology of muscle fatigue: 15 years later Integr. Comp. Biol., October 1, 2007; 47(4): 465 - 473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Rudroff, B. K. Barry, A. L. Stone, C. J. Barry, and R. M. Enoka Accessory muscle activity contributes to the variation in time to task failure for different arm postures and loads J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2007; 102(3): 1000 - 1006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J P Weir, T W Beck, J T Cramer, T J Housh, T D Noakes, A St Clair Gibson, and E V Lambert Is fatigue all in your head? A critical review of the central governor model * Commentary. Br. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2006; 40(7): 573 - 586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. C. Gandevia and J. L. Taylor Supraspinal fatigue: the effects of caffeine on human muscle performance J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2006; 100(6): 1749 - 1750. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Kalmar and E. Cafarelli Central excitability does not limit postfatigue voluntary activation of quadriceps femoris J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2006; 100(6): 1757 - 1764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. Mottram, K. S. Maluf, J. L. Stephenson, M. K. Anderson, and R. M. Enoka Prolonged Vibration of the Biceps Brachii Tendon Reduces Time to Failure When Maintaining Arm Position With a Submaximal Load J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2006; 95(2): 1185 - 1193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]