Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 98: 2119-2125, 2005. First published January 27, 2005; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01286.2004
8750-7587/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/6/2119    most recent
01286.2004v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anstey, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anstey, C. M.

Comparison of three strong ion models used for quantifying the acid-base status of human plasma with special emphasis on the plasma weak acids

Chris M. Anstey

Department of Intensive Care, Nambour Hospital, Nambour, Queensland, Australia

Submitted 22 November 2004 ; accepted in final form 6 January 2005

Currently, three strong ion models exist for the determination of plasma pH. Mathematically, they vary in their treatment of weak acids, and this study was designed to determine whether any significant differences exist in the simulated performance of these models. The models were subjected to a "metabolic" stress either in the form of variable strong ion difference and fixed weak acid effect, or vice versa, and compared over the range 25 ≤ PCO2 ≤ 135 Torr. The predictive equations for each model were iteratively solved for pH at each PCO2 step, and the results were plotted as a series of log(PCO2)-pH titration curves. The results were analyzed for linearity by using ordinary least squares regression and for collinearity by using correlation. In every case, the results revealed a linear relationship between log(PCO2) and pH over the range 6.8 ≤ pH ≤ 7.8, and no significant difference between the curve predictions under metabolic stress. The curves were statistically collinear. Ultimately, their clinical utility will be determined both by acceptance of the strong ion framework for describing acid-base physiology and by the ease of measurement of the independent model parameters.

acid-base balance; strong ion difference; mathematical model; pH



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: C. M. Anstey, Director, Intensive Care, Dept. of Intensive Care, Nambour Hospital, Nambour, Queensland, Australia 4560 (E-mail: chris_anstey{at}health.qld.gov.au)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
I. Kurtz, J. Kraut, V. Ornekian, and M. K. Nguyen
Acid-base analysis: a critique of the Stewart and bicarbonate-centered approaches
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 2008; 294(5): F1009 - F1031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Physiological Society.