Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 98: 1705-1711, 2005. First published January 7, 2005; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01015.2004
8750-7587/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/5/1705    most recent
01015.2004v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caruso, J.
Right arrow Articles by Siconolfi, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Caruso, J.
Right arrow Articles by Siconolfi, S.

Albuterol aids resistance exercise in reducing unloading-induced ankle extensor strength losses

John Caruso,1,2,3 John Hamill,1 Miki Yamauchi,1 Dean Mercado,2 Tim Cook,2 Brian Higginson,2 Sean O'Meara,2 Jeff Elias,1 and Steve Siconolfi4

1Exercise Physiology Laboratory, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada; 2Movement Science Laboratory, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana; 3Healthcare Research Associates, Orlando, Florida; and 4School of Health Services & Human Performance, Ithaca College, Ithaca, New York

Submitted 15 September 2004 ; accepted in final form 16 December 2004

While resistance exercise (REX) reduces ankle extensor (AE) mass and strength deficits during short-term unloading; additional treatments, concurrently administered with REX, are required to attenuate the greater losses seen with longer unloading periods. Subjects performed left leg REX, which otherwise refrained from ambulatory and weight-bearing activity for 40 days, while randomized to a capsule (placebo, albuterol) dosing regimen with no crossover to note whether albuterol helps REX mitigate unloading-induced AE losses. A third group of subjects served as unloaded controls. On days 0, 20, and 40, the following data were collected from the left leg: calf cross-sectional area and AE strength measures. Cross-sectional area was estimated using anthropometric methodology, whereas AE strength data were obtained from eight unilateral calf-press repetitions on an inertial-based REX device. Repeated-measures mixed-factorial 3 x 3 analyses of covariance, with day 0 values as a covariate, revealed group x time interactions for the strength variables eccentric total work (ETW) and average power (EAP). Tukey's honestly significant difference shows REX-placebo subjects incurred significant ETW and EAP losses by day 40, whereas the REX-albuterol treatment evoked strength gains to those same variables without concurrent muscle accretion. Corresponding concentric variables did not display similar changes. Day 40 control data significantly declined for many variables; relative to the REX-albuterol treatment, some losses were significant after 20 days. ETW and EAP gains to unloaded AE may be due to one or more mechanisms. Continued research identifying mechanisms responsible for such changes, as well as the safety of REX-albuterol administration in other models, is warranted.

salbutamol; triceps surae; unilateral limb suspension; simulated spaceflight



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. Caruso, 312 CH, The Univ. of Tulsa, 600 S. College Ave., Tulsa, OK 74104 (E-mail: john-caruso{at}utulsa.edu)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Physiological Society.