HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free All Versions of this Article: 98/2/512    most recent 00430.2004v1 Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (13) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Watson, R. A. Articles by Pride, N. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Watson, R. A. Articles by Pride, N. B.

Postural changes in lung volumes and respiratory resistance in subjects with obesity

Respiratory Medicine National Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom

Submitted 29 April 2004 ; accepted in final form 30 September 2004

Reduced functional residual capacity (FRC) is consistently found in obese subjects. In 10 obese subjects (mean ± SE age 49.0 ± 6 yr, weight 128.4 ± 8 kg, body mass index 44 ± 3 kg/m²) without respiratory disease, we examined 1) supine changes in total lung capacity (TLC) and subdivisions, 2) whether values of total respiratory resistance (Rrs) are appropriate for mid-tidal lung volume (MTLV), and 3) estimated resistance of the nasopharyngeal airway (Rnp) in both sitting and supine postures. The results were compared with those of 13 control subjects with body mass indexes of <27kg/m². Rrs at 6 Hz was measured by applying forced oscillation at the mouth (Rrs,mo) or the nose (Rrs,na); Rnp was estimated from the difference between sequential measurements of Rrs,mo and Rrs,na. All measurements were made when subjects were seated and when supine. Obese subjects when seated had a restrictive defect with low TLC and FRC-to-TLC ratio; when supine, TLC fell 80 ml and FRC fell only 70 ml compared with a mean supine fall of FRC of 730 ml in control subjects. Values of Rrs,mo and Rrs,na at resting MTLV in obese subjects were about twice those in control subjects in both postures. Relating total respiratory conductance (1/Rrs) to MTLV, the increase in Rrs,mo in obese subjects was only partly explained by their reduced MTLV. Rnp was increased in some obese subjects in both postures. Despite the increased extrapulmonary mass load in obese subjects, further falls in TLC and FRC when supine were negligible. Rrs,mo at isovolume was increased. Further studies are needed to examine the causes of reduced TLC and increases in Rrs,mo and sometimes in Rnp in obese subjects.

nasal resistance; total respiratory resistance; restrictive defect; supine posture

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. E. Peppard, N. R. Ward, and M. J. Morrell The Impact of Obesity on Oxygen Desaturation during Sleep-disordered Breathing Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 15, 2009; 180(8): 788 - 793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. L. Jones and M.-M. U. Nzekwu The effects of body mass index on lung volumes. Chest, September 1, 2006; 130(3): 827 - 833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]